6601301011 The Truth of Plato’s Idealism, Aristotle’s Pragmatism, and Mr.Huh’s Centrist Ideology #Plot

Discussion on political policies (SanSam New Deal, birth incentives, foreign policy, parliamentary reform), philosophical concepts (Plato’s Idealism, Aristotle’s Pragmatism, Mr.Huh’s Centrist Ideology), and social issues (aging society, youth unemployment, family dynamics).

Character Profiles

Mr.Huh | Lecturer | Proposes policies like the “Wild Ginseng New Deal” and “Marriage Allowance,” and advocates for “Middle-Class-ism” (중산주의).
Go Gwan-hwan | Audience Member | Expresses support for Mr.Huh’s policies, particularly the “Wild Ginseng New Deal.”
Park Geun-hye | Former President | Her policies, such as the “National Assembly Advancement Act” and “THAAD missile deployment,” are criticized. Her Saju (사주) is analyzed.
Park Chung-hee | Former President | Praised for his forestation efforts and economic contributions. His Saju (사주) is analyzed.
Kim Moo-sung | Politician | His proposal to bring in Joseonjok (ethnic Koreans from China) to address low birth rates is criticized.
Kim Jong-in | Politician | Responsible for amending the constitution to include “economic democratization.”
Socrates | Philosopher | Advocated for “Philosopher-King Rule” (철인정치) and was sentenced to death.
Plato | Philosopher | Socrates’s student, who advocated for “Idealism” (이상주의).
Aristotle | Philosopher | Plato’s student, who advocated for “Pragmatism” (실용주의).
Alexander the Great | Conqueror | Aristotle’s student, influenced by pragmatism to unify the world.
Deng Xiaoping | Former Chinese Leader | Adopted pragmatism and market economy principles based on Hayek’s ideas.
Hayek | Economist | Advocated for market economy principles, influencing Deng Xiaoping.
Ruzvelt | Former US President | Implemented the New Deal policy to overcome the Great Depression.

Scene-by-Scene Summary

#1 (00:00:00) Introduction to the Wild Ginseng New Deal

Mr.Huh introduces the “Wild Ginseng New Deal” policy, which aims to provide employment for millions of retirees up to 100 years old .
He emphasizes that this policy would eliminate unemployment in Korea .
An audience member, Go Gwan-hwan, confirms his interest in the policy after seeing it on YouTube .
Go Gwan-hwan praises Park Chung-hee’s forestation efforts, which created a suitable environment for planting various crops like wild ginseng, pine nuts, and medicinal herbs .
He highlights the significant economic benefits of these efforts, estimating an annual natural economic effect of 100 trillion won .
Go Gwan-hwan argues that the current elderly population, facing a super-aged society, needs to return to nature for employment rather than seeking jobs in the city .
He suggests that cultivating wild ginseng, pine nuts, and medicinal herbs in the reforested mountains would be more beneficial than low-paying urban jobs .
He also mentions the potential for exporting Korean beans and wild ginseng, which differ from those produced in other countries .
Mr.Huh asserts that this policy would allow individuals to earn 1 million won monthly through self-sufficiency, eliminating the need for government subsidies .
He emphasizes that the reforested mountains are now suitable for various agricultural activities .
Go Gwan-hwan reiterates that older adults prefer returning to nature for health and well-being, and that traditional “senior employment” is often ineffective .
He stresses that the policy does not require advanced skills and is well-suited for those over 60, who are often skilled in farming .
Mr.Huh reveals that he proposed this “agricultural New Deal” 25 years ago, foreseeing the current unemployment crisis .
He criticizes current politicians for their lack of foresight and effective policies, calling them “sleeping politicians” .
He warns that current political trends will turn future generations into “slaves” of China and Japan .
He reiterates that his “Wild Ginseng New Deal” would provide 1 million won per month, food, and lodging for anyone aged 18 to 100, without a document review .
He explains that couples would receive 2 million won and could save 50 million won in three years .
He envisions large-scale agricultural production to achieve 100% self-sufficiency in food, including rice and wild ginseng for export .
He criticizes Korea’s current reliance on 70% imported food, much of which is contaminated or preserved, leading to health problems .
He argues that abandoning agriculture will lead to the nation’s downfall .
Mr.Huh also mentions his “marriage allowance” policy, which would provide 100 million won (equivalent to 1 billion won today) for marriage, and retroactively 30 million won per child for those who had children in the past 10 years .
He suggests that this policy would secure votes and ensure his presidency .
He emphasizes that his policies, including the “Wild Ginseng New Deal,” are unique and beyond the imagination of conventional politicians .
He proposes establishing 1,000 “agricultural New Deal” centers nationwide, operating like military bases, where people of all ages can live, work, and enjoy cultural activities .
He states that residents would receive a monthly income of about 3 million won, including a salary, national dividend, and senior allowance .

#2 (00:15:00) Analysis of Current Political and Diplomatic Issues

Mr.Huh apologizes for being late to the lecture .
He analyzes President Park Geun-hye’s Saju (사주), predicting that the “Byeongsin Year” (병신년) will bring conflict and potential war to the Korean Peninsula .
He describes Park Geun-hye as having a strong, unyielding personality, similar to a “Ganggang” (개강) Saju, which could lead to uncompromising stances in negotiations with North Korea .
He contrasts this with Syngman Rhee’s diplomatic approach during the Korean War, which led to an armistice .
He criticizes Park Geun-hye’s foreign policy, particularly the discussion of deploying the THAAD missile system, which he believes alienates China and pushes them to support North Korea .
He argues that the US already has sufficient tactical nuclear weapons in Korea to neutralize North Korea, making THAAD unnecessary and provocative .
He also criticizes the proposal for a “five-party talks” excluding North Korea, which further angers China .
He then discusses the “National Assembly Advancement Act” (국회선진화법), which Park Geun-hye championed to prevent “animalistic” and “violent” parliamentary sessions .
This law requires a three-fifths majority for bills to pass, making legislative action difficult .
He argues that while the law itself was well-intentioned, it has led to a “vegetative National Assembly” (식물국회) where no laws are passed, effectively hindering the president’s agenda .
He suggests that Park Geun-hye should transcend party politics, resign from her party, and treat all political factions equally to effectively govern .
He emphasizes that true leadership requires political skill and impartiality, not just legal frameworks .
He reiterates that Korea’s security should be managed through diplomacy, not by provoking major powers with missile defense systems .
He explains that China is already surrounded by US and Russian nuclear weapons, making North Korea its only strategic “escape route” .
Deploying THAAD in South Korea would further corner China, leading to increased tensions .
He also mentions the deployment of B-52 bombers, which carry nuclear weapons, as another unnecessary provocation .
He criticizes the current political leadership for making decisions that could lead to war .
He expresses concern that without his intervention, Korea’s future generations will become “slaves” and the nation will disappear .

#3 (00:36:40) Critique of Kim Moo-sung’s Immigration Policy

Mr.Huh addresses a question about Kim Moo-sung’s proposal to bring in Joseonjok (ethnic Koreans from China) to address low birth rates .
He states that while he respects individuals, he can criticize their policies .
He argues that bringing in Joseonjok would not solve the birth rate issue and would instead lead to job displacement for Koreans, as Joseonjok are known for their strong work ethic .
He compares this to the past, when North Korean refugees successfully established businesses in South Korea, often outcompeting locals .
He suggests that such policies would effectively “eliminate the lineage” of Korean families .
He reiterates that his “agricultural Wild Ginseng New Deal” policy, proposed 25 years ago, is the true solution for unemployment and national prosperity .
He emphasizes that Korea’s reforested mountains are ideal for cultivating high-value crops like wild ginseng, which will be crucial for future medicine and exports .
He explains that this policy would provide income for the unemployed and stimulate the national economy .

#4 (00:43:00) Philosophical and Economic Perspectives

Mr.Huh discusses the Saju (사주) of Park Geun-hye and Park Chung-hee, highlighting their contrasting personalities .
He describes Park Geun-hye as outwardly feminine but inwardly masculine, possessing strong resolve, while Park Chung-hee was outwardly masculine but inwardly feminine, shy, and humble .
He suggests that Park Chung-hee’s feminine nature made him a good manager of the country, while his male aides provided the necessary masculine drive .
He connects physical traits to personality, noting that tall women tend to be more masculine and independent, leading to higher divorce rates and more single individuals .
He contrasts this with shorter women, who tend to be more feminine and dependent, leading to lower divorce rates .
He applies this to North Korean women, who are often tall and strong-willed, contributing to their resilience .
He criticizes South Korean society for raising children as “emperors,” leading to a lack of social skills and an inability to cope with challenges .
He warns that China’s one-child policy has created similar issues, making its future uncertain .
He then transitions to philosophical concepts, explaining that Plato’s “Idealism” (이상주의) originated from Socrates’s “Philosopher-King Rule” (철인정치) .
Socrates believed that enlightened individuals, not elected officials, should govern .
Aristotle, Plato’s student, developed “Pragmatism” (실용주의), which influenced Alexander the Great’s conquests .
He argues that democracy is “consumptive” (소모적) and inefficient, citing China’s economic success under Deng Xiaoping’s pragmatism, which was influenced by Hayek’s market economy ideas .
He proposes his “Middle-Class-ism” (중산주의) as a modern form of “Emperor Rule” (황제), similar to the monarchies in Japan and the UK, which he believes are essential for a small nation to achieve global dominance .
He criticizes the current state of Korea’s “Wongudan” (원구단), an altar where emperors performed rituals, which has been neglected and surrounded by modern buildings .
He calls for the restoration of Wongudan and the surrounding area to its original grandeur, symbolizing the revival of Korea’s imperial spirit .
He asserts that he is destined to become the “World Emperor” (세계황제) and transform the world into a “paradise on earth” .
He demonstrates his extraordinary abilities by mentioning his ability to do 1,000 push-ups .
He explains that his long lifespan of 362 years is a testament to his unique energy .
He then delves into the symbolism of the “Eight Trigrams” (팔괘) in the Korean flag, relating them to the current year’s challenges .
He predicts that the “Byeongsin Year” (병신년) will bring significant difficulties for Korea, including diplomatic struggles and internal complexities .
He uses the phrase “Hwakcheol Bu-eo” (확철부어), meaning “fish in a cart rut,” to describe Korea’s precarious situation, implying that the nation is isolated and facing imminent collapse .
He argues that traditional “Idealism,” “Philosopher-King Rule,” and “Pragmatism” are no longer sufficient, and that his “Middle-Class-ism” is necessary for survival .
He compares his “New Deal” policy to Roosevelt’s New Deal, which saved the US from the Great Depression, suggesting that Korea also needs a similar intervention .
He criticizes Kim Jong-in’s “economic democratization” policy, which aimed to curb large corporations, as insufficient to address the current economic crisis .
He introduces the three core principles of “Middle-Class-ism”: “Neutrality” (중도), “No Factions” (무파벌), and “No Discrimination” (무차별), emphasizing equality for all, including women .
He laments the loss of “spirit” (기) among Koreans, including “vigor” (폐기), “passion” (혈기), “courage” (용기), “vitality” (생기), and “energy” (서기) .
He notes that people now exhibit “malice” (악), “hostility” (살기), and “resentment” (도끼) due to economic hardship and lack of hope .
He mentions receiving calls from suicidal individuals and offering them hope by promising solutions if he becomes president .
He humorously points out his old belt, which he has worn for 45 years, symbolizing frugality .
He contrasts the government’s “austerity policy” (긴축정책), which leads to deflation and economic decline, with a “consumption policy” (소비정책) that encourages spending and inflation .
He argues that while global policy should eventually shift to austerity due to limited resources, Korea currently needs a consumption-driven approach .
He explains that the character for “economy” (경제) signifies “intertwined threads,” reflecting the complex balance between consumption and austerity .
He warns that the loss of positive “spirit” leads to negative “energies” like “greed” (투기), “lust” (음기), and “hunger” (허기), resulting in societal decay and moral decline .
He categorizes different types of “spirit” (기) observed in physiognomy (관상), including “bone spirit” (골상), “complexion spirit” (찰상), “heart spirit” (심상), “blood spirit” (혈상), and “body spirit” (채상) .
He shares a teaching from Donghak (동학) about the consequences of good and bad deeds: good deeds may not bring immediate rewards but avert misfortune, while bad deeds may not bring immediate punishment but erode blessings .
He uses the analogy of spring grass growing imperceptibly to illustrate how good deeds accumulate over time, leading to unexpected blessings .
He gives an example of a security guard’s son becoming a judge and marrying into a wealthy family, demonstrating how good deeds eventually lead to prosperity .
He explains that “Idealism” (이상주의) is about striving for a perfect “Idea” (이데아), which he aims to create as a “paradise” for everyone .
He emphasizes that true happiness comes from inner contentment and meaningful work, not from excessive wealth .
He envisions a society where people work until 100, fostering intergenerational harmony and vitality .
He discusses the three essential qualities of a virtuous daughter-in-law, symbolized by “fire”: “inflammability” (인화성), meaning she brings prosperity; “extinguishability” (소멸성), meaning she quickly forgets grievances; and “dependence” (의존성), meaning she relies on her husband .
He contrasts this with women who lack these qualities, leading to family discord and ruin .
He then discusses the three qualities of “water”: “absorbency” (흡수성), meaning she unites the family; “fluidity” (유동성), meaning she is humble and deflects praise; and “transparency” (투명성), meaning she is honest and clear in her actions .
He shares an anecdote about his recent public appearances, where large crowds, including foreign tourists, eagerly took photos with him, demonstrating his “absorbent” quality .
He notes that people were drawn to him, praising his appearance and expressing hope for their own fortunes .
He concludes by reiterating that negative actions, like sharpening a knife on a stone, lead to unseen losses and eventual ruin .