6612031055 Prophecies regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and candlelight vigils, Trump’s election, Mr.Huh’s presidential candidacy and world unification #Plot

Mr.Huh’s Saturday Lecture (December 3, 2016)
current political and economic issues, and a demonstration of Mr.Huh’s “energy” healing.

Character Profiles

허경영 (Mr.Huh) | Lecturer, Presidential Candidate | Claims to have prophetic abilities and unique spiritual insights. He advocates for radical economic and political reforms.
박근혜 (Park Geun-hye) | Former President of South Korea | Subject of a lecture discussing her impeachment and the surrounding political events.
트럼프 (Trump) | Former US President | His election was allegedly predicted by Mr.Huh.
최순실 (Choi Soon-sil) | Associate of Park Geun-hye | Implicated in a political scandal that led to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment.
정유라 (Chung Yoo-ra) | Daughter of Choi Soon-sil | Her involvement in the scandal contributed to public outrage.
이재명 (Lee Jae-myung) | Seongnam Mayor | Mentioned as a politician who respects Mr.Huh’s views on national finances.
반기문 (Ban Ki-moon) | Former UN Secretary-General | Described as a potential presidential candidate not suitable for Korea.
안철수 (Ahn Cheol-soo) | Politician | Described with a “goat-like” personality, prone to sulking.
문재인 (Moon Jae-in) | Politician | Described as a “cow-like” figure, hardworking but easily exploited.
정형순 (Jung Hyung-soon) / 데이빗 정 (David Jung) | Philosophy Professor from the US | Attends the lecture and expresses support for Mr.Huh, believing he is the leader Korea needs.
박지영 (Park Ji-young) | Sewol Ferry Crew Member | Died while saving students during the Sewol ferry disaster. Honored by Obama.
최혜정 (Choi Hye-jung) | Ansan Teacher | Died while saving students during the Sewol ferry disaster. Honored by Obama.
민병두 (Min Byung-doo) | Democratic Party Strategist | Acknowledges the need for a bold candidate like Mr.Huh in Korean politics.

Scene-by-Scene Summary

#1 (00:00:00)

Mr.Huh greets the audience, noting that those who came to his lecture instead of a protest are fortunate .
He compares life paths, stating that while people start similarly, their choices, like attending his lecture versus a protest, lead to vastly different outcomes .
He emphasizes that immediate benefits might not be apparent, but long-term gains are significant .
He uses an analogy of the human circulatory system to illustrate how a wrong path can lead to negative consequences, just as blood flowing incorrectly can harm the body .
He concludes that attending his lecture offers more benefit than participating in protests .

#2 (00:04:29)

Mr.Huh discusses his predictions regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils, which he claims to have made four years prior .
He also states he predicted Trump’s election one year and two months earlier, clarifying these are not mere predictions but insights from spiritual vision .
He explains that such prophecies should not be openly discussed until they materialize .
He reiterates his prediction that if Hillary Clinton were elected, war would break out in Korea .
He envisions himself becoming president with 90% of the vote and unifying the world .
He describes a scenario where initial low poll numbers for him would rise dramatically after he proposes a monthly stipend of 1.5 million won for every citizen over 20, eliminating financial worries and making all Koreans middle class .
He asserts that people would trust him to fulfill this promise, even if it means selling state assets or acquiring funds from other countries .
He believes this would lead to a 90% voter turnout and his election .
He argues that current politicians only take money, while he would provide 2 billion won per person, or 8 billion won for a family of four, over their lifetime .
He criticizes the current political system, where GNP is high but citizens struggle financially .
He predicts that the Choi Soon-sil and Chung Yoo-ra scandal will motivate young people to vote, unlike in the past .
He states that if he becomes president, he will lower the voting age to 14, making voting mandatory for middle schoolers by linking it to academic performance and social advancement .
He believes this will increase overall voter turnout, as parents would bring their children to vote .
He argues that giving voting rights to 14-year-olds would empower them to demand educational reforms, such as the abolition of private tutoring and the Suneung exam .
He emphasizes that a 90% voter turnout and his 90% vote share would make him president .
He envisions a strong presidential system where he would declare martial law, dismiss current National Assembly members, and elect 100 new ones to implement his policies, unlike Park Geun-hye, who was swayed by politicians .

#3 (00:11:40)

Mr.Huh recounts a news story about a young man who found 13 million won and reported it to the police .
The owner, a businessman, was so moved that he added 37 million won to the recovered money and donated 50 million won to charity .
He then shares his own experience from 7-8 years ago, finding 76 million won that fell from a moving truck .
He chased the truck for 20 minutes to return the money, which was a family’s house deposit .
He emphasizes the importance of respecting women, citing that households that disrespect women do not prosper .
He connects this to the Korean flag (Taegeukgi) and the I Ching (Juyeok), explaining that the current flag’s arrangement of trigrams (heaven above, earth below) signifies national decline and conflict .
He argues that the trigrams should be reversed (earth above, heaven below) to represent peace and harmony, known as “Jicheontae-gwae” .
He criticizes the current flag and the name of the Blue House (Cheong Wa Dae) for bringing misfortune .
He asserts that women should hold power in the household, as seen in traditional Korean families where grandmothers managed finances .
He illustrates this with historical examples of queens influencing kings, even to the point of poisoning them to secure their sons’ succession .
He concludes that disrespecting women, as in the Joseon Dynasty with multiple concubines, led to the nation’s downfall .
He claims to have mastered the I Ching before elementary school, which guides him away from harmful paths, and he has never consumed alcohol, tobacco, coffee, or soda .
He further explains the I Ching’s trigrams, noting that the current Taegeukgi was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, leading to its flawed representation .
He suggests that the flag should be changed to reflect a more auspicious arrangement .
He contrasts the Korean flag with Japan’s “Mugeuk” (circle) flag, which he considers more powerful as it represents the entire universe .
He believes the Taegeukgi was designed by the Japanese to bring misfortune to Korea, causing division and weakness .
He advises viewing things with a “Mugeuk” perspective, seeing all humans as equal, rather than judging by good or evil .
He argues that placing women in a position of respect, as in “Jicheontae-gwae,” would bring peace to Korea .
He connects this to the Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra scandal, suggesting that while their actions were wrong, the public’s reaction was excessively harsh because they were women .
He believes that women’s mistakes should be treated with more leniency .

#4 (00:29:10)

Mr.Huh refers to a video from four years ago where he discussed Park Geun-hye’s fate shortly after her election .
He analyzes Park Geun-hye’s Saju (four pillars of destiny), noting that her birth year (Shinmyo) conflicts with 2016 (Byeongsin), indicating a difficult year .
He predicted that Park Geun-hye would not survive 2016, suggesting it was a year of “Wonjinsal” (a type of conflict in Saju) that could even lead to war .
He warns against excessive protests, stating that they only aid North Korea and could lead to misjudgment .
He recounts his experience in Vietnam, where he witnessed how internal strife and spies contributed to the country’s downfall .
He advises caution regarding protests, as they might expose people to undesirable elements .
He emphasizes that while mistakes happen, national division over them is unnecessary, as legal processes can handle wrongdoings .
He reiterates that Park Geun-hye’s Saju indicates a difficult 2016, but she would recover in 2017 .
He then examines Park Jung-hee’s Saju, noting his “Insin-sa-hae” (four pillars of destiny indicating revolution) and “Sin-ja-jin Samhap” (three harmonies), which signify a powerful and formidable character .
He points out that while many share similar Saju, their destinies differ due to factors like physiognomy and relationships .
He concludes that Saju has a minor influence (0.1%) on destiny, with “Daeun” (major luck cycles) being more significant .
He reiterates that Park Geun-hye’s “Daeun” was unfavorable in 2016 due to “Wonjinsal” and “Chung” (clash), leading to her downfall .
He asserts that Park Geun-hye’s power has already diminished in the public’s mind, even if she remains in office .
He advocates for a less confrontational approach to women’s mistakes, especially for the first female president, given her unique background .
He believes Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution, and her actions, such as promoting cultural projects or directing economic policies, fall within her presidential authority .
He argues that presidents have emergency economic powers and can consult trusted individuals without public disclosure .
He criticizes the public’s outrage over Park Geun-hye’s exercise of her powers, contrasting it with the astronomical sums allegedly embezzled by previous male presidents and their families .
He expresses sympathy for former President Lee Myung-bak and his brother, acknowledging their difficult pasts .
He contrasts the public’s focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-wind” scandal with the much larger financial wrongdoings of past administrations .
He questions whether any current politicians possess the leadership qualities needed to save Korea, especially compared to himself .
He criticizes other potential presidential candidates: Ban Ki-moon (frog-like, unsuitable for Korea), Ahn Cheol-soo (goat-like, prone to sulking), and Moon Jae-in (cow-like, hardworking but exploited) .
He mentions Lee Jae-myung, who reportedly respects Mr.Huh and agrees that Korea’s problem is not a lack of money but too many thieves .
He plays a clip of Lee Jae-myung praising him .
He reiterates his promise to use 50% of the national budget to pay off household debt, starting with those who have loans under 500 million won .
He proposes selling state-owned enterprises and real estate to fund this debt relief .
He argues that resolving household debt is crucial for economic recovery, as it would free up money for consumption .
He also promises to abolish the Suneung exam and reduce school subjects, redirecting private education expenses into the economy .
He connects Park Geun-hye’s downfall to her father, Park Jung-hee, noting that her problems in the “Year of the Monkey” (2016) coincided with his birth year, leading to symbolic events like fires at his birthplace and a market .
He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s actions brought shame upon her parents .
He warns that the “fire” of 2016 could engulf the entire Korean Peninsula, referencing historical events like the Byeongja Horan (Qing invasion) .
He criticizes the public’s tendency to focus on others’ faults while ignoring their own, likening it to “Seolsanggasang” (adding insult to injury) .
He argues that the media unfairly demonized Park Geun-hye, similar to how they misled the public about US beef safety .
He criticizes the media for sensationalizing issues and causing harm to businesses .

#5 (00:54:04)

Mr.Huh shows a clip of Obama asking for questions from Korean journalists, but none come forward, leading to an awkward silence .
A Chinese journalist eventually steps in to ask a question on behalf of Asia .
He criticizes Korean journalists for focusing only on scandals like Choi Soon-sil’s while lacking a global perspective .
He argues that the Choi Soon-sil scandal should be viewed macroscopically, noting that past administrations had far greater corruption involving family members, which was treated more leniently .
He suggests that the public’s outrage over a 40-year friendship is disproportionate compared to the actions of blood relatives .
He believes Park Geun-hye might have been unaware of her friend’s actions, as she was diligent in managing her family .
He asserts that Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution and that the media’s portrayal is a fabrication .
He plays another clip of Obama expressing disappointment that no Korean journalists came forward .
He concludes that Korean media focuses on trivial matters like “catching Mr.Huh or Choi Soon-sil” instead of broader international issues .
He praises Obama as a great president for honoring Sewol ferry crew member Park Ji-young and teacher Choi Hye-jung, who died saving students, with medals and commemorative stamps .
He criticizes Korea for not similarly honoring its heroes .
He laments that Korean men often fail to act heroically, contrasting it with the bravery of Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung .
He states that if he becomes president, such incidents will not happen again .
He criticizes the public for allowing a single woman’s actions to “ruin the country” and for using the Taegeukgi and the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House), which he believes are inauspicious .
He proposes renaming Cheong Wa Dae to “Haneulgung” (Sky Palace) .
He explains that “Blue House” (블루하우스) is associated with prisoners or laborers, while “White House” (화이트하우스) is for the wealthy .
He emphasizes that Koreans need to be more mindful of such symbolism .
He advocates for honoring Sewol heroes like Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung in textbooks and providing pensions to their families .
He discusses macroeconomics (state-led) and microeconomics (individual-led), citing examples like Keynesian economics, Thatcher, Reagan, and Deng Xiaoping’s reforms in China .
He criticizes Korea’s current economic situation, where household debt is rising, and interest rates are increasing, leading to a cycle of debt for citizens .
He argues that many people participate in candlelight vigils not just for Choi Soon-sil but out of economic desperation .
He criticizes the government’s handling of the shipping industry, which led to the collapse of Hanjin Shipping, and the slow pace of judicial processes for ordinary citizens compared to politically motivated cases .
He points out the rapid dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the swift creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, contrasting it with the slow processing of ordinary citizens’ requests .
He argues that the process of creating these foundations was flawed, even if no money was stolen .
He criticizes the fabrication of meeting minutes for these foundations .
He emphasizes that the process, not just the outcome, is crucial for public trust .
He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s actions against the Unified Progressive Party, whose leader Lee Jung-hee had challenged her, were seen as retaliation .
He warns against emotional responses in politics, advocating for “spiritual” leadership that can foresee the future .
He claims to have recognized Trump as a future president despite his low standing at the time, due to his “spiritual eye” .
He warns that if Park Geun-hye leaves office prematurely, a less capable leader might take over, leading to national ruin .
He expresses understanding for Park Geun-hye’s decision to initiate cultural projects, given the dire economic situation and lack of domestic investment .
He discusses “Banpojihyo” (filial piety of crows), where crows feed their parents, and “Daehyo” (great filial piety), which involves bringing honor to one’s family .
He criticizes Park Geun-hye for bringing shame to her parents’ names, contrasting it with the ideal of “Daehyo” .
He outlines three types of filial piety: material, emotional, and “Daehyo” (achieving success) .
He also mentions “Saengjonjihyo” (filial piety during parents’ lifetime) and “Sahujihyo” (filial piety after death) .
He emphasizes that true filial piety involves considering parents’ sacrifices and maintaining family harmony, which he suggests Park Geun-hye failed to do by isolating her siblings .
He reiterates the importance of spiritual insight over emotional reactions for the future of the Korean nation .
He warns against abusing power and emphasizes the importance of taking responsibility for one’s own negative actions .
He discusses the story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya (Guan Bao Zhi Jiao), highlighting their strong friendship and Bao Shuya’s recommendation of Guan Zhong to the king despite his past flaws .
He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil was similar, but in Korea, such trust can lead to betrayal .

#6 (01:23:50)

Mr.Huh introduces singer Choi Sarang, who performs a song .
He then introduces Jung Hyung-soon, a philosophy professor from the US, who expresses his concern about the chaotic situation in Korea .
Jung Hyung-soon initially came to support Ban Ki-moon but realized he was not suitable for Korea .
He also met Lee Jae-myung, whose popularity had risen significantly .
Jung Hyung-soon discovered Mr.Huh through online research and believes he is the leader Korea needs .
He praises Mr.Huh’s extensive lectures and unique approach, comparing him to historical figures like Napoleon who emerged during times of crisis .
He highlights Mr.Huh’s predictions from 25 years ago, which are now relevant .
He discusses the “Yulgok Bill” (defense industry corruption), stating that no politician dares to fix it due to fear of assassination or imprisonment .
He concludes that only a leader willing to sacrifice their life, like Mr.Huh, can solve such deep-rooted problems .
Choi Sarang performs another song, “You Are Rich” .

#7 (01:32:00)

Mr.Huh reads a YouTube comment from “가나다 몬트리올” praising his wisdom and comprehensive understanding of national and international issues .
The commenter states that other presidential candidates, including Lee Jae-myung, are far below Mr.Huh’s level .
The commenter pledges to promote Mr.Huh among Koreans in Canada .
He mentions recent media coverage, including an article in “International Newspaper” titled “Will a Korean Trump Emerge Next Year?” .
He quotes Democratic Party strategist Min Byung-doo, who suggested that if a bold candidate like Mr.Huh doesn’t emerge, Korea’s economy will worsen .
He plays a clip from an MBN broadcast on September 24, 2015, where he predicted Trump’s presidency, stating that Trump was the hope for America despite being the last-place candidate .
He acknowledges that some view his promises as unrealistic or showmanship .
He argues that an expert president like him would prevent war on the Korean Peninsula by understanding the needs of both North and South Korea .
He suggests that a “businessman” president like Trump would be more amenable to requests .
He warns that Hillary Clinton’s presidency could lead to war on the Korean Peninsula .
He reiterates that he foresaw Trump’s victory a year and a half in advance, using his “spiritual eye” .
He warns that if Park Geun-hye steps down, a less capable leader could take over, leading to national ruin and Koreans becoming subservient to China .
He mentions an online article titled “The 19th President Predicted by a Fortune Teller Who Predicted Trump’s election” .
The article states that no current presidential candidate is suitable and that a “quirky” figure, like Trump, will become president .
The article concludes that Mr.Huh is predicted to be the 19th president .
He acknowledges the public’s disbelief but emphasizes that seemingly impossible events are becoming reality in Korea .
He states that he does not wish to take power by undermining others but will run in the presidential election in December .
He refers to a “Maeil Business Newspaper” article from October 22, 2016, stating that 93% of Koreans supported Hillary Clinton .
He asserts that only he can decide who becomes the US president and prevent nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula .
He claims to have influenced Trump’s election and expresses his reluctance to engage in petty political battles in Korea .
He concludes the lecture, inviting newcomers to come forward for personal healing .

#8 (01:42:00)

Mr.Huh demonstrates his “energy” by having a man from Geoje call out names while he tries to push his arm down .
The man’s arm remains strong when he thinks of “Jesus” or “Buddha” but weakens when he thinks of his own name .
He claims that only his name has this effect and that merely calling his name can improve health, while his direct touch can heal .
He states that he is not an ordinary human but an “envoy” from above, and he dislikes organized religion but respects all faiths .
He repeats the demonstration, showing that calling his name strengthens the man, while calling other names weakens him .
He asserts that his photo alone has healing power, and calling his name before sleep can reverse aging and extend lifespan .
He then performs a “diagnosis” by touching the man’s body, claiming to detect areas of weakness or illness, such as the thyroid, bronchi, and potential for stroke .
He then “heals” the man by touching his forehead, demonstrating that the man’s arm strength is restored and consistent across all areas .
He claims that this healing can occur even by looking at his image on a phone .
He asserts that he is the “creator” who has come to Earth in human form, and people are blessed to meet him .
He reiterates that he doesn’t need to be involved in religion and doesn’t require money .
He declares the man “completely healed” and advises him to exercise .
He then proceeds to “heal” other audience members, including women for breast cancer and joint issues .