2022.01.29 1320 The Three Stages of Perception: From Prejudice to Right View

2022.01.29 1320 A presidential election That Doesn’t Uphold the constitution Will Ruin the Nation

Keyword Frequency Presidential Election Not Upholding the Constitution Will Ruin the Nation.

election: 30
advertisement: 19
image: 18
constitution: 10
party: 10
broadcast: 9
media: 8
money: 8
general: 7
debate: 7

Today’s Central Metaphor
The central metaphor compares political campaigns and public perception to advertising techniques, specifically contrasting “hard approach” (direct, factual messaging) with “soft approach” (emotional, narrative-driven messaging) to explain how public opinion is shaped and how his own campaign is being unfairly suppressed.

Lecture in Numbers
2 months ago: Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating was 5.7%.
20%: What Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating would be if included in polls.
5.6%: Huh Kyung-young’s current approval rating.
3rd place: Huh Kyung-young’s initial ranking in polls.
4th, 5th place: Rankings of other candidates allowed in debates instead of Huh Kyung-young.
70 times: Number of battles the historical figure Hwang Jang-sa won consecutively.
71st time: The battle Hwang Jang-sa lost, leading to his suicide.
100 years old: Reference to a general’s age.
2 AM, 3 AM: Times when Huh Kyung-young’s supporters distribute flyers.
10,000 soldiers: Number of soldiers in a historical anecdote.
100,000 soldiers: Number of enemy soldiers in a historical battle.
5,000 soldiers: Number of soldiers led by the Baekje general.
3,000 people: Number of names on a “kill list” of media executives.
0.3%: Approval rating of candidate Kim Dong-yeon.
5 members: Number of National Assembly members required for debate participation.
10 members: Number of National Assembly members Sim Sang-jung has.
253 people: Number of candidates nominated by Huh Kyung-young’s party.
300 members: Total number of National Assembly members.
180 members: Number of National Assembly members secured through satellite parties.
1,200 members: Number of National Assembly members secured through satellite parties.
50 paintings: Number of paintings Hitler tried to sell.
10 million people: Number of Jews Hitler is claimed to have killed.
6 million people: Actual number of Jews Hitler is claimed to have killed.
11.5 billion won: Amount embezzled by a public official.
40%: Yoon Suk-yeol’s approval rating.
38%: Lee Jae-myung’s approval rating.
3%: Sim Sang-jung’s approval rating.
10%: Required approval rating for Huh Kyung-young to participate in legal TV debates.
550,000 people: Number of small business owners who received 5 million won in government aid.
30 years ago: When Huh Kyung-young first proposed giving money to citizens.
300 trillion won: National budget 10 years ago.
600 trillion won: Current national budget.
400 trillion won: Amount that could be saved from the national budget.
100 trillion won: Amount from property-proportional fines.
100 trillion won: Amount from special business taxes.
100 trillion won: Amount from tax consolidation.
100 trillion won: Amount from preventing tax evasion.
800 trillion won: Total estimated funds.
1.5 million won: Monthly payment proposed for citizens.
18 years old: Age eligibility for proposed payments.
35 million people: Estimated number of eligible recipients.
52.5 trillion won: Monthly cost of payments.
12 months: Duration of annual payments.
630 trillion won: Annual cost of payments.
170 trillion won: Remaining funds after payments.
5 million won: Marriage subsidy.
100 million won: Child-rearing subsidy for 10 years.
4.4 million won: Monthly payment for a couple.
2.2 million won: Monthly payment for an individual.
700,000 won: Elderly allowance.
15,000 to 20,000 people: Daily COVID-19 cases.
3rd, 4th dose: Recommended COVID-19 vaccinations.
6-7 seats: Number of National Assembly seats held by Sim Sang-jung’s party.
3 seats: Minimum number of National Assembly seats to participate in debates.
1 month: Period for average approval rating calculation for debate participation.
5%: Minimum average approval rating for debate participation.
100 million won: Initial payment upon election.

Signature Sentence
“A presidential election that does not uphold the Constitution will ruin the nation.”

Concise Summary & Highlights
The lecture argues that the current presidential election is unconstitutional and unfair, threatening the nation’s future.
Huh Kyung-young’s campaign is being unfairly excluded from polls and debates despite high approval ratings.
The use of “satellite parties” by major parties is a violation of the Constitution and undermines smaller parties.
He draws parallels to historical figures like Hwang Jang-sa and the Baekje general to inspire a “no retreat” mindset among supporters.
Effective political promotion requires both “hard approach” (direct messaging) and “soft approach” (emotional, narrative-driven imagery).
Huh Kyung-young proposes a comprehensive financial plan to provide citizens with significant monthly and one-time payments, funded by budget cuts and new taxes.
He criticizes the media and the National Election Commission for their biased actions and failure to uphold fairness.

Scriptural / Religious Citations
Eightfold Path (Buddhism): He references the “Eightfold Path” (팔정도) and specifically “Right View” (정견) as the most important element, implying that having a correct understanding leads to the completion of the other seven.

Historical & Epochal Context
The lecture is situated within the context of a contemporary South Korean presidential election, characterized by intense political competition, media bias, and public dissatisfaction with traditional parties. It touches upon issues of constitutional integrity, fairness in democratic processes, and economic concerns such as the cost of living and government spending. He also references historical figures and events from Chinese and Korean history, as well as the 20th-century rise of Hitler, to draw parallels and illustrate points about leadership, strategy, and the consequences of injustice.

Key Figures & Events Referenced
Huh Kyung-young: He himself, a presidential candidate whose campaign is the central subject of the lecture.
Ahn Cheol-soo: A presidential candidate mentioned as being initially behind Huh Kyung-young in polls but gaining ground.
Sim Sang-jung: A presidential candidate mentioned as being in 5th place and participating in debates despite lower approval ratings.
Hwang Jang-sa (項羽, Xiang Yu): A historical Chinese general known for his “no retreat” strategy (破釜沈舟, breaking pots and sinking boats).
Baekje General: A historical Korean general who fought to the death for his king, even after killing his own family to demonstrate commitment.
King Uija (의자왕): The last king of Baekje, mentioned in relation to the Baekje general’s loyalty.
Yi Seong-gye (이성계): A Korean general who overthrew the Goryeo dynasty, contrasted with the loyal Baekje general.
Kim Dong-yeon: A presidential candidate with a very low approval rating (0.3%) who is included in polls, unlike Huh Kyung-young.
Hitler: Referenced as an example of how personal trauma and injustice can lead to extreme actions, specifically his persecution of Jews.
Lee Jae-myung: A presidential candidate, mentioned in comparison to Yoon Suk-yeol regarding campaign style and policy.
Yoon Suk-yeol: A presidential candidate, discussed regarding his unexpected rise, campaign style, and wife’s alleged political involvement.
Kim Keon-hee: Yoon Suk-yeol’s wife, whose alleged comments about political influence are cited.
Donghak Peasant Revolution (동학농민운동): Referenced in the context of a historical emperor’s dying words about good and evil deeds.
Lee Myung-bak: Former South Korean president, whose rise to power through a popular drama is discussed as an example of “soft approach” advertising.
Park Geun-hye: Former South Korean president, whose campaign is contrasted with Lee Myung-bak’s, highlighting the impact of “soft approach” on public perception.
Steve Jobs: Implicitly referenced through the discussion of Apple’s advertising strategy.
IBM: Referenced as a competitor to Apple, whose “hard approach” advertising is contrasted with Apple’s “soft approach.”
Kang Yong-seok: A political commentator who is shown to be supportive of Huh Kyung-young’s policies.
Baekcheon (백천) Teacher: A Korean shaman/fortune teller whose predictions about Huh Kyung-young are mentioned.

Core Concept Definitions
Unconstitutional Election (헌법을 지키지 않는 대선): A presidential election process that violates the fundamental principles and laws outlined in the nation’s constitution, particularly regarding fairness, equality, and democratic participation.
Human Rights Suppression (인권 탄압): Actions that infringe upon the basic rights and freedoms of individuals, such as excluding a candidate from public debates despite their qualifications.
No Retreat (임전무퇴): A military or strategic mindset characterized by an unwavering commitment to victory, refusing to retreat or surrender, even in the face of overwhelming odds.
Breaking Pots and Sinking Boats (파부침주): A historical military strategy, also known as “burning one’s boats,” where a commander destroys their own means of retreat (e.g., cooking pots, boats) to force soldiers to fight to the death. This is equivalent to a “do or die” situation.
Battle Formation with Back to Water (배수진): A military tactic where an army positions itself with a river or other body of water behind it, cutting off retreat and forcing soldiers to fight more fiercely.
Satellite Party (비례 위성 정당): A political party created by a larger party, typically during an election, to circumvent electoral laws and maximize the number of proportional representation seats it can win.
Hard Approach (하드 어프로치): An advertising or communication strategy that relies on direct, factual, and explicit messaging, often focusing on product features or direct calls to action.
Soft Approach (소프트 어프로치): An advertising or communication strategy that appeals to emotions, narratives, and subtle imagery to create a connection with the audience, often focusing on lifestyle or aspirational values.
Right View (정견): A Buddhist concept, the first element of the Eightfold Path, referring to a correct understanding of reality, free from delusion and prejudice. He contrasts this with “prejudice” (편견) and “partial view” (양견).
Right Observation (정관): A term used to describe a more superficial observation, focusing on external appearances rather than deeper understanding.
Right Seeing (정시): A term used to describe seeing beyond the immediate image to understand the underlying message.
Middle View (중견): A concept referring to a balanced perspective that avoids extremes, seeing both sides of an issue.
Prejudice (편견): A biased or preconceived opinion not based on reason or actual experience.

Central Questions & Answers
Central Question: Why is the current presidential election unfair and unconstitutional, and what are the consequences for the nation?
Speaker’s Answer: The election is unfair because major parties and media collude to exclude candidates like Huh Kyung-young from polls and debates, violating principles of fairness and equality. This is exacerbated by the creation of “satellite parties” that undermine the spirit of the Constitution. Such actions lead to national chaos, instability, and a failure to address the real needs of the people, ultimately ruining the nation.

Conclusion & Strategic / Philosophical Implications
The lecture concludes with a call to action for supporters to actively promote Huh Kyung-young, aiming to achieve the 5% and 10% approval ratings necessary for legal debate participation. The broader implication is that the current political system is corrupt and self-serving, leading to national decline. Huh Kyung-young positions himself as the God-man (divine human) who can transcend partisan divides, restore fairness, and implement policies that genuinely benefit all citizens, especially the disadvantaged, thereby preventing national ruin. The philosophical implication is that true leadership requires a “Right View” (정견) that sees beyond superficial appearances and partisan biases to understand the deeper reality and needs of the nation.

Cross-Referencing
Apple vs. IBM Advertising: He references the historical advertising rivalry between Apple and IBM to illustrate the difference between “hard approach” (IBM’s direct, factual messaging) and “soft approach” (Apple’s emotional, narrative-driven messaging). This is a widely known case study in marketing.
Lee Myung-bak’s Drama: He refers to a drama about Lee Myung-bak’s life, which is a known historical event in South Korean politics, as an example of “soft approach” influencing public perception and election outcomes.
Eightfold Path: A core teaching in Buddhism, widely known, referenced by Mr. Huh to explain different levels of understanding and perception.

Content Gaps & Unaddressed Areas
Specifics of “Collusion”: While the lecture repeatedly claims “collusion” between major parties, media, and broadcasters to exclude Huh Kyung-young, it does not provide specific evidence, names, or detailed instances of this alleged collusion beyond general statements.
Legal Basis for Exclusion: Huh Kyung-young was excluded from debates despite being 3rd in polls, but it doesn’t fully clarify the specific legal or regulatory criteria for debate participation at the time, making it difficult to assess the exact nature of the “constitutional violation.”
Feasibility of Financial Plan: The lecture outlines a detailed financial plan for massive citizen payouts, including sources like budget cuts and new taxes. However, it lacks detailed economic analysis or independent verification of the feasibility and potential impact of these measures on the national economy.
Definition of “God-man”: While the term God-man is used, a clear and comprehensive definition of what it entails in His context, beyond being a “divine human” who can solve national problems, is not provided.
Details of “Special Judgment”: He mentions a “special judgment” he will conduct as president, but the specific legal framework, scope, and process of this judgment are not elaborated upon.

Future Predictions & Prophetic Statements
Huh Kyung-young’s Approval Rating Increase: He predicts that his approval rating will continue to rise, eventually exceeding 10%, which will legally compel his inclusion in TV debates.
Legal Action Against Exclusion: If Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating reaches 10% and he is still excluded from debates, his campaign will be able to file a legal injunction.
Downfall of Opponents: He predicts that those who have acted unfairly against him, particularly those involved in creating satellite parties and excluding him from media, will face negative consequences, implying a form of divine retribution or political downfall.
National Chaos and Foreign Invasion: He warns that if the current political trajectory continues with partisan conflict, it could lead to national chaos, potentially creating an opportunity for North Korea to invade.
Huh Kyung-young as UN Secretary-General: He suggests that a powerful nation like the US, UK, France, China, or Russia cannot be UN Secretary-General, implying that a smaller nation’s leader, like himself, would be more suitable for global stability.
Emergency Decree: If the National Assembly obstructs his proposed policies, Huh Kyung-young suggests he might declare a state of emergency to pass necessary laws.
“Dragon Ascending”: He uses the metaphor of a “dragon ascending” from among “minnows” (other candidates) to describe his eventual victory.
“Left, Right, No Answer, Huh-Pa” (좌파, 우파 답없다, 허파다): This phrase is predicted to become a central advertising slogan and song, symbolizing the failure of traditional political ideologies and the emergence of Huh Kyung-young’s alternative.

Executive Insight
The lecture provides a compelling case study in populist political communication, blending sharp criticism of the establishment with a visionary, almost messianic, self-portrayal. Huh Kyung-young strategically frames the current presidential election as fundamentally unconstitutional and unfair, leveraging public distrust in traditional politics and media. His proposed solutions, particularly the extensive financial benefits for citizens, are designed to appeal directly to economic anxieties. He’s use of historical analogies and advertising theory to explain campaign dynamics reveals a sophisticated understanding of public persuasion. For professionals, this highlights the power of narrative and emotional appeal (“soft approach”) in shaping political outcomes, even when direct factual arguments (“hard approach”) are suppressed. It also underscores the potential for charismatic figures to challenge established norms by positioning themselves as the sole solution to systemic failures, particularly when public sentiment is ripe for radical change.

The Peril of Unconstitutional Elections and the Path to a Just Society

1. Basic Information
   Lecture Session and Date: Huh Kyung-young Saturday Lecture, 2022.01.29
   One-sentence main theme or title summary: Unfair presidential elections that disregard the constitution will lead the nation to ruin, necessitating a resolute stand against injustice and the promotion of a new political paradigm through strategic public outreach.
   Location: Not specified in the source.
   Key Segments:
   Critique of Election Injustice: Huh Kyung-young’s exclusion from polls and debates, despite his significant support, is presented as a violation of constitutional fairness and equality.
   The Spirit of “Pa Bu Chim Ju” (Burning Boats and Breaking Pots): Drawing an analogy from ancient Chinese general Xiang Yu, this segment conveys the necessity of an unwavering, no-retreat mindset for his supporters in the face of political adversity.
   Critique of Satellite Parties and Political Corruption: The lecture addresses the unconstitutional creation of “satellite parties” by major political factions, which undermines smaller parties and distorts democratic representation.
   The Power of Advertising and Image-Making: Huh Kyung-young explains the concepts of “hard approach” and “soft approach” in advertising, applying them to political campaigns and the importance of conveying both policy and personal narrative.
   Vision for a Prosperous and Equitable Society: The lecture outlines Huh Kyung-young’s economic policies, such as the National Dividend and various financial support programs, designed to alleviate financial burdens and foster a society where all citizens can thrive.

2. Core Messages
   Upholding Constitutional Principles in Elections: “A presidential election that does not uphold the constitution will ruin the nation.”
   This statement underscores the critical importance of fairness and equality in the electoral process, asserting that deviations from constitutional principles lead to national decline.
   The Indomitable Spirit of “Pa Bu Chim Ju”: “This is what we call ‘Pa Bu Chim Ju’ (burning boats and breaking pots) in the spirit of war.”
   This illustrates the absolute commitment and no-retreat attitude required from his supporters, akin to a military strategy where all escape routes are eliminated to ensure victory.
   Condemnation of Political Manipulation through Satellite Parties: “They created these proportional satellite parties, violating the constitution.”
   This highlights the perceived corruption and manipulation within the political system, where major parties exploit loopholes to consolidate power at the expense of smaller factions and democratic integrity.
   Strategic Communication for Public Engagement: “There are two ways to convey a message: hard approach and soft approach.”
   This explains the dual strategy for public outreach, combining direct policy communication with emotional and narrative-driven appeals to effectively connect with and persuade the electorate.
   Creating a Financially Secure Society: “I will create a society where students who struggle academically can still honor their parents.”
   This conveys a core policy objective: to establish a welfare system that ensures financial stability for all citizens, regardless of their academic or professional achievements, thereby fostering filial piety and social well-being.

3. Detailed Summary
   Topic: Unfairness in the Presidential Election
   Main assertions and explanations: Huh Kyung-young’s candidacy, despite having a significant approval rating (5.7% two months prior, now over 5.6%), has been deliberately excluded from public opinion polls and TV debates by mainstream media and political parties. This exclusion is a clear violation of the constitution, infringing upon principles of fairness and equality. He notes that if included, his support would likely exceed 20%.
   Analogies, examples, biblical/scientific/historical references: The situation is likened to a “dog-eat-dog” world where established powers conspire to suppress emerging figures.
   Practical message or application: Supporters are urged to actively inform the public about these injustices to overturn the current unfair election landscape.

Topic: The Spirit of “Pa Bu Chim Ju” (Burning Boats and Breaking Pots)
Main assertions and explanations: The lecture introduces the historical example of Xiang Yu (황우 장사), an ancient Chinese general who, before battle, would destroy his army’s cooking pots and sink their boats. This act, known as “Pa Bu Chim Ju,” symbolized an unwavering commitment to victory, leaving no option for retreat. It instilled in his soldiers the mindset that they must conquer or die.
Analogies, examples, biblical/scientific/historical references: Xiang Yu’s 70 consecutive victories and eventual suicide after his 71st defeat illustrate his extreme pride and refusal to accept failure. This spirit is contrasted with the current political climate, where politicians prioritize personal gain over national duty.
Practical message or application: Huh Kyung-young’s supporters are encouraged to adopt this “no retreat” mindset, fighting with absolute determination for his victory, as they are “soldiers unlike any before or after.”

Topic: Critique of Political Corruption and Satellite Parties
Main assertions and explanations: The current political system is criticized for its “논공행상” (distribution of rewards based on merit) culture, where established parties collude to maintain power. The creation of “proportional satellite parties” by major parties is a direct violation of the constitution, designed to siphon off votes from smaller parties and distort democratic representation. This practice is seen as a betrayal of the public and a subversion of the electoral system.
Analogies, examples, biblical/scientific/historical references: The actions of these parties are compared to “robbers” who steal the opportunities of smaller parties. The historical example of Baekje General, who fought to the death for his king despite the king’s flaws, is used to contrast with the self-serving nature of modern politicians. The lecture also references the teachings of Donghak Seongje (동학 성제), emphasizing that good deeds may not bring immediate rewards but avert disaster, while bad deeds may not bring immediate punishment but drive away blessings.
Practical message or application: The public is urged to recognize these manipulative tactics and hold the Central Election Commission accountable for its failure to ensure fair elections.

Topic: The Power of Advertising and Image-Making
Main assertions and explanations: Huh Kyung-young, as an expert in advertising, explains two key approaches: “hard approach” (direct, factual messaging) and “soft approach” (emotional, narrative-driven messaging). successful campaigns integrate both. For instance, a brand name like “Daeil Band” becomes synonymous with bandages through constant exposure (hard approach), while a compelling personal story (soft approach) can deeply resonate with the public, as seen in the success of figures like Lee Myung-bak.
Analogies, examples, biblical/scientific/historical references: The success of Apple’s advertising, which combined the “hard” digital image of IBM with the “soft,” natural image of an apple, is presented as a prime example of effective integration. The story of Hitler’s deep-seated hatred for Jews, stemming from personal injustices, illustrates how powerful emotional narratives can be.
Practical message or application: Supporters are instructed to convey both Huh Kyung-young’s policies (hard approach) and his personal story of overcoming adversity (soft approach) to the public. His unique “leg-lifting” pose and concepts like “공중부양” (levitation) and “축지법” (teleportation) are presented as integrated hard/soft images that capture attention and convey deeper meaning.

Topic: Vision for a Prosperous and Equitable Society
Main assertions and explanations: Huh Kyung-young’s core economic policies include a National Dividend of 1.5 million won per month for adults over 18, a 100 million won payment upon election, and 50 million won for marriage. He explains how these programs are financially feasible by reallocating the national budget (reducing 600 trillion won to 400 trillion won), implementing a wealth-proportional fine system, special business taxes, tax integration, and preventing tax evasion, totaling 800 trillion won in available funds.
Analogies, examples, biblical/scientific/historical references: The current government’s limited support for small business owners (5 million won to 550,000 people) is contrasted with his comprehensive plan, highlighting the inadequacy of existing measures. The concept of “Pa Bu Chim Ju” is again invoked, urging supporters to achieve the 10% approval rating needed for legal TV debates, which would allow his policies to gain wider traction.
Practical message or application: The public is encouraged to support Huh Kyung-young to realize a society where financial worries are eliminated, allowing individuals to live fulfilling lives, honor their parents, and contribute to national prosperity without the burden of economic hardship.

4. Key Quotes Collection
   “A presidential election that does not uphold the constitution will ruin the nation.” (Stated at the beginning, setting the lecture’s main theme.)
   “We will fight to the end against this infringement on fairness and equality, which must be upheld by election law.” (Regarding his exclusion from debates and polls.)
   “This is what we call ‘Pa Bu Chim Ju’ (burning boats and breaking pots) in the spirit of war.” (Explaining the unwavering commitment required from his supporters.)
   “Our soldiers are unlike any before or after.” (Referring to the dedication and unique qualities of his supporters.)
   “The list of media executives who excluded my name from public opinion polls is already in my 3,000-person ‘death list’.” (A warning to those who perpetuate electoral unfairness.)
   “The creation of proportional satellite parties itself will eventually bring consequences to them.” (Critiquing the unconstitutional actions of major political parties.)
   “Good deeds may not bring immediate blessings, but they automatically drive away misfortune. Bad deeds may not bring immediate misfortune, but they automatically drive away blessings.” (A philosophical teaching on karma and consequences.)
   “There are two ways to convey a message: hard approach and soft approach.” (Introducing his advertising and communication strategy.)
   “Apple succeeded because it combined the hard approach with the soft approach.” (Using Apple as an example of effective integrated marketing.)
   “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa (허파 – ‘Huh’s faction’ / ‘lungs’).” (A new slogan to define his political stance beyond traditional ideologies.)
   “If Huh Kyung-young becomes president, the National Power Party and the Democratic Party will not fight.” (Presenting his role as a unifying figure in a divided political landscape.)
   “I will create a society where students who struggle academically can still honor their parents.” (A core policy vision for social equity and filial piety.)

5. Historical / Doctrinal Connections
   This lecture builds upon Huh Kyung-young’s established teachings by consistently advocating for constitutional adherence and fairness in governance, a recurring theme in his critique of existing political structures. His emphasis on the “Pa Bu Chim Ju” spirit connects to his broader doctrine of unwavering resolve and divine mission, often expressed through his God-man identity, where he presents himself as a figure destined to overcome all obstacles. The condemnation of satellite parties directly relates to his long-standing critique of political corruption and the need for radical reform, aligning with his 33 policies that aim to dismantle systemic injustices and redistribute wealth.

The discussion on advertising and image-making (hard vs. soft approach) is a practical application of his teachings on effective communication and public engagement, reflecting his belief in the power of conveying both his divine mandate and his compassionate vision for humanity. This also ties into his divine-human theory, where he, as the God-man, understands human psychology and societal needs at a profound level, enabling him to craft messages that resonate deeply.

Newly emphasized points include:
The explicit use of the “Pa Bu Chim Ju” analogy to galvanize his supporters, highlighting a heightened sense of urgency and determination in the face of electoral challenges.
The introduction of the slogan “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa (허파).” This marks a new development in his political branding, aiming to transcend traditional ideological divides and position his movement as a unique, unifying force.
A more detailed breakdown of the financial feasibility of his National Dividend policy, directly addressing criticisms about funding and reinforcing his commitment to economic transformation.

7. Action Items & Blessing Guidance
   Actively Inform the Public: Supporters are urged to spread awareness about the unfairness of the current election system and Huh Kyung-young’s exclusion from polls and debates.
   Adopt the “Pa Bu Chim Ju” Spirit: Cultivate an unwavering, no-retreat mindset in supporting Huh Kyung-young, demonstrating absolute commitment to his vision.
   Promote Huh Kyung-young’s Image and Message: Utilize both “hard approach” (policies, facts) and “soft approach” (personal story, emotional appeal) to effectively communicate his platform and background to the public.
   Strive for 10% Approval Rating: Work diligently to increase Huh Kyung-young’s public approval to over 10%, which would legally mandate his inclusion in TV debates, thereby amplifying his message.
   Embrace the “Huh-pa” Slogan: Actively use and promote the new slogan “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa (허파)” to define his movement and attract those disillusioned with traditional politics.

8. One-Sentence Overall Summary
   Huh Kyung-young’s lecture passionately decries the unconstitutional and unfair practices in the current presidential election, urging his supporters to adopt an indomitable “Pa Bu Chim Ju” spirit to overcome political corruption, strategically communicate his transformative vision for a financially secure society through integrated advertising approaches, and ultimately usher in a new era of national prosperity and justice.

Central Questions & Answers

1. What is the current state of the South Korean presidential election and Huh Kyung-young’s involvement?
   Question: What is the current situation regarding the South Korean presidential election, and how is Huh Kyung-young being treated by the media and political establishment?
   Answer: Huh Kyung-young, despite having a significant approval rating (5.7% two months prior, now over 5.6%), has been deliberately excluded from public opinion polls and TV debates by the mainstream media and political parties. This exclusion, which allowed lower-ranked candidates to participate in debates while he was sidelined, is seen as a violation of the constitution and a clear act of human rights suppression. His supporters are urged to fight against this injustice and inform the public to overturn the election’s unfairness.
   Key Quote: “A presidential election that does not uphold the constitution will ruin the country.”

2. What is the “Pa Bu Chim Ju” spirit and how does it relate to Huh Kyung-young’s campaign?
   Question: What is the historical concept of “Pa Bu Chim Ju” (破釜沈舟) or “burning the boats,” and how does Huh Kyung-young apply this philosophy to his presidential campaign and supporters?
   Answer: “Pa Bu Chim Ju” (literally “smashing the cauldrons and sinking the boats”) refers to a military strategy where one destroys all means of retreat, forcing soldiers to fight with the resolve to win or die. This is akin to the Korean concept of Baesujin (배수진), meaning “making a stand with one’s back to the water.” his supporters embody this spirit, showing unwavering dedication by distributing flyers at 2-3 AM, unlike paidアルバイト (part-timers). This signifies a commitment to absolute victory, with no possibility of retreat.
   Key Quote: “Our supporters have that spirit. Our supporters are rapidly increasing. They are soldiers who have never existed before and will never exist again.”

3. How does Huh Kyung-young explain the concept of “Hard Approach” vs. “Soft Approach” in advertising and political campaigns?
   Question: In the context of advertising and political campaigns, what is the difference between a “Hard Approach” and a “Soft Approach,” and how does Huh Kyung-young utilize these concepts?
   Answer: The Hard Approach focuses on direct, factual messaging and brand recognition (e.g., “Daeil Band-Aid” becoming synonymous with all band-aids). The Soft Approach appeals to emotions and personal stories, building a deeper connection (e.g., a candidate’s humble upbringing). Huh Kyung-young notes that while his name on TV would be a Hard Approach, his life story (orphan, factory worker, self-educated) serves as a powerful Soft Approach. He criticizes the media for preventing his Hard Approach visibility, forcing his campaign to rely on books for the Soft Approach. He also uses his iconic “leg-lifting” pose as a combined Hard and Soft image, embodying both his identity and a deeper, human element.
   Key Quote: “My life itself is a Soft Approach. When my name appears on TV, that becomes a Hard Approach.”

4. What is Huh Kyung-young’s perspective on the current political parties and the future of Korea?
   Question: What is Huh Kyung-young’s view on the current ruling and opposition parties in South Korea, and what does he foresee for the nation’s future under their leadership?
   Answer: Huh Kyung-young believes that both the ruling and opposition parties are corrupt and ineffective, leading the country towards chaos. He criticizes their creation of “satellite parties” for proportional representation, which he sees as a violation of the constitution and a move to monopolize power, crushing smaller parties. if either of the major parties wins, the country will enter a state of confusion, with the opposing party constantly attempting impeachment. He asserts that only a neutral figure like himself, without parliamentary seats, can unite the factions and stabilize the nation.
   Key Quote: “If the ruling and opposition parties clash, the country will fall into chaos.”

5. How does Huh Kyung-young propose to fund his “National Dividend” and other welfare policies?
   Question: How does Huh Kyung-young plan to secure the massive funds needed for his proposed policies, such as the “National Dividend” (monthly payments) and other welfare benefits?
   Answer: Huh Kyung-young outlines a detailed financial plan to raise 800 trillion won. This includes:
   Reducing the national budget (currently 600 trillion won, can be reduced to 300 trillion, freeing up 300 trillion).
   Implementing a wealth-proportional fine system (100 trillion won).
   Taxing special businesses (100 trillion won).
   Consolidating taxes (100 trillion won).
   Preventing tax evasion (100 trillion won).
   He calculates that even after providing 1.5 million won monthly to 35 million adults (totaling 630 trillion won annually), 170 trillion won would still remain for other welfare programs like marriage and childcare support. the current government’s spending is inefficient and corrupt, making his proposals entirely feasible.
   Key Quote: “These ignorant fools who criticize Huh Kyung-young, 170 trillion won will remain!”

6. What is the significance of “Jeonggyeon” (正見, Right View) in understanding the world, according to Huh Kyung-young?
   Question: What is “Jeonggyeon” (正見, Right View) in Huh Kyung-young’s philosophy, and why is it crucial for truly understanding people and situations, especially in politics?
   Answer: Jeonggyeon (正見) is the highest form of perception, going beyond mere observation (Gwan, 觀) or even seeing both sides of an issue (Yanggyeon, 兩見). While Gwan is superficial (e.g., “he looks handsome”), and Yanggyeon considers opposing viewpoints, Jeonggyeon involves a complete, holistic understanding that integrates all aspects, including the inner world and underlying truths. It’s about seeing the “middle way” (Jungdo) and reaching a complete conclusion. He criticizes the media for having “Pyeonggyeon” (偏見, prejudice) rather than Jeonggyeon, judging him based on superficial factors like his educational background or lack of parliamentary seats.
   Key Quote: “Jeonggyeon means seeing the entire picture, not just the image.”

7. What is Huh Kyung-young’s ultimate vision for society, particularly for those who are struggling?
   Question: What is Huh Kyung-young’s ultimate vision for society, especially concerning individuals who struggle academically or professionally, and how does he aim to support them?
   Answer: Huh Kyung-young envisions a society where everyone, regardless of academic achievement or professional success, can live a dignified and happy life. He aims to create a system where young people who struggle to find jobs or get married due to societal pressures can still achieve filial piety towards their parents and raise families. His policies, such as the 100 million won marriage subsidy and 1.5 million won monthly payments, are designed to alleviate financial burdens, allowing individuals to focus on family and personal well-being. He believes the current system unfairly punishes those who are not “successful” by conventional standards, leading to despair and even suicide.
   Key Quote: “I want to create a society where students who are not good at studying can still show filial piety to their parents.”

Top 3 Recommended Questions

What is the current state of the South Korean presidential election and Huh Kyung-young’s involvement?
How does Huh Kyung-young explain the concept of “Hard Approach” vs. “Soft Approach” in advertising and political campaigns?
What is Huh Kyung-young’s ultimate vision for society, particularly for those who are struggling?

Meeting Minutes: “A Presidential Election That Doesn’t Uphold the Constitution Will Ruin the Country” – Huh Kyung-young’s 1320th Saturday Lecture (January 29, 2022)

Ⅰ. Meeting Overview

Category	Details
Date	January 29, 2022
Location	Not specified (Lecture setting)
Attendees	Huh Kyung-young (Speaker), Audience (supporters and general public)
Agenda	Discussion on the unconstitutionality and unfairness of the current presidential election, the importance of fair media coverage and debate participation for Huh Kyung-young, and his proposed policies for national prosperity.

Ⅱ. Meeting Discussion

• Unfairness in the Presidential Election

  • Huh Kyung-young’s candidacy has been deliberately excluded from opinion polls and TV debates by major media outlets and political parties, despite his consistent 3rd place ranking (over 5.6% approval rating).
  • This exclusion is a violation of the constitution, human rights, and the principles of fairness and equality in election law.
  • The media and broadcasting companies are urged to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls and TV debates.
  • The current election system, including the creation of satellite parties, is unprecedented in world history and undermines the representation of minor parties.
  • The National Election Commission is criticized for its inaction and perceived bias towards the ruling party, failing to enforce fairness despite constitutional violations.
  • The judiciary is also implicated for its perceived failure to uphold justice in election-related matters.

• Huh Kyung-young’s Vision and Policies

  • the need for a fair and prosperous society where financial worries are eliminated.
  • He proposes a “National Dividend” policy, including 100 million KRW for all adults over 18 and 1.5 million KRW monthly payments.
  • Funding for these policies would come from reducing the national budget, implementing a wealth-proportional fine system, special business taxes, tax integration, and preventing tax evasion, totaling approximately 800 trillion KRW.
  • He criticizes the current government’s limited support for small business owners during the pandemic.
  • He advocates for a society where even those who struggle academically or professionally can marry, raise families, and care for their parents without financial burden.
  • He suggests that a president without parliamentary power, like himself, could effectively mediate between opposing political parties to stabilize the country.

• Historical and Philosophical Context

  • The lecture draws parallels with historical figures like Xiang Yu (項羽), emphasizing a “no retreat” (背水陣) mentality in the face of adversity.
  • The story of the Baekje general who sacrificed his family before battle to ensure his soldiers’ commitment is cited as an example of ultimate dedication.
  • The concept of “good deeds” (行善) and “bad deeds” (行惡) from the Donghak peasant revolution is introduced, stating that good deeds may not bring immediate rewards but avert disaster, while bad deeds may not bring immediate punishment but prevent future blessings.
  • He uses the example of Hitler’s hatred for Jews, stemming from personal experiences of his mother’s abuse and his own mistreatment by Jewish individuals, to illustrate how past injustices can lead to catastrophic consequences.

• Advertising and Communication Strategies

  • He, identifying as a top advertising expert, explains two types of advertising approaches: “hard approach” (direct, factual) and “soft approach” (emotional, narrative-based).
  • He uses examples like “Daeil Band” (a common brand name for bandages) and “Miwon” (a seasoning brand) to show how repeated exposure creates brand recognition and unconscious preference.
  • The success of Apple’s advertising, which combined the “hard approach” (digital, logical) of IBM with a “soft approach” (emotional, natural) represented by the apple logo, is highlighted.
  • Huh Kyung-young’s own image, including his “leg-lifting” pose and early life story (orphanage, poverty, self-study), are presented as examples of combining hard and soft approaches to convey his message and image.
  • He introduces new advertising slogans like “Left-wing, Right-wing, No Answer, Huh-pa (허파 – Huh’s faction/lungs)” to create a distinct political identity.

• Spiritual and Prophetic Elements

  • The lecture references prophecies about a “sacred emperor” (聖帝) appearing in a “degenerate age” (末世) to save the people.
  • A video clip featuring Baekcheon, a Korean-American fortune teller and president of a geomancy association, is played, where he praises Huh Kyung-young as a “Heaven spirit” (天神) and warns of impending disasters if he is not recognized.
  • The concepts of “right view” (正見), “right observation” (正觀), and “right insight” (正視) from Buddhist philosophy are explained, emphasizing the importance of seeing beyond superficial appearances and biases.
  • He criticizes the media and public for holding “prejudices” (偏見) against him, failing to see his true nature and intentions.

Ⅲ. Action Items

• Media and Broadcasting Companies: Immediately include Huh Kyung-young in all presidential opinion polls and TV debates.
• National Election Commission: Take action to ensure fairness in the election process and address the exclusion of Huh Kyung-young from media coverage and debates.
• Huh Kyung-young’s Supporters: Continue to spread awareness about the unfairness of the election and promote Huh Kyung-young’s policies and vision with a “no retreat” mindset.
• Huh Kyung-young’s Campaign: Utilize both “hard” and “soft” advertising approaches to effectively communicate Huh Kyung-young’s image and message to the public.
• Public: Exercise “right view” (正見) to understand the true nature of the candidates and the election process, avoiding prejudice.

The Presidential Election Not Upholding the Constitution Will Ruin the Nation

1. The Unfairness of the Presidential Election and the Call for Justice
   The current presidential election is marred by significant unfairness and inequality. For two months, Huh Kyung-young, who had a 5.7% approval rating, has been deliberately excluded from public opinion polls by the collusion of the ruling and opposition parties, as well as the media. If he had been included, his approval rating would now exceed 20%, currently standing at over 5.6%. Despite this, excluding Huh Kyung-young, who was third in the polls at the time, and only allowing the fourth and fifth-place candidates to participate in the four-way debate, constitutes a violation of the Constitution and a clear suppression of human rights. This infringement upon the fairness and equality that must be upheld under election law will be fought against until the very end. The media and broadcasting companies are strongly urged to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in public opinion polls and allow his participation in TV debates. If they fail to comply, the enraged public sentiment and Heaven will never forgive them.

A presidential election that does not uphold the Constitution will lead the nation to ruin. Although we speak of unfairness and inequality, this situation has gone too far. Initially, Huh Kyung-young was third, Ahn Cheol-soo was fourth, and Sim Sang-jung was fifth. However, because Huh Kyung-young was not featured on TV, he fell to fourth place. Now, they claim that only the third and fourth-place candidates will debate. The public is slowly realizing how unfair this presidential election is. Therefore, we must do our utmost to expose this to the world and overturn the presidential election.

2. The Spirit of Unwavering Resolve: Lessons from History
   The spirit of unwavering resolve is crucial in the face of current challenges. Consider the story of Xiang Yu (項羽), a powerful general from China. He fought 70 battles over five years, winning every single one. In his 71st battle, he suffered a defeat and committed suicide on the battlefield in front of his troops, stabbing himself with his sword. Xiang Yu was an incredibly strong general who led his nation for five years, always fighting when war broke out. He could not tolerate defeat. This kind of mental fortitude, like that of Xiang Yu, is what is needed as we approach the presidential election. There is no retreat; we must never give up. We will be victorious in any circumstance.

Xiang Yu’s approach to war was characterized by a specific objective: “smashing the cooking pots and sinking the boats” (破釜沈舟, pa bu chen zhou). This meant destroying all the cooking pots used by the soldiers and sinking their boats after crossing a river. This strategy, known as baesujin (背水陣) in Korea, literally means “lining up with one’s back to the water”. It signifies a commitment to fight to the death, leaving no possibility of retreat. By destroying their means of cooking and escape, Xiang Yu instilled in his soldiers the mindset that they would either conquer the enemy’s House or starve to death. This extreme measure ensured that the soldiers fought with absolute determination, knowing there was no turning back. This spirit of “no retreat” (臨戰無退, imjeonmutoe) is akin to the Hwarang (花郎) spirit of ancient Korea.

3. The Unprecedented Nature of Current Political Maneuvers
   The current political landscape is marked by unprecedented maneuvers, particularly concerning the formation of satellite parties. The Democratic Party (더불어민주당) created a proportional representation satellite party (비례 위성 정당, birye wiseong jeongdang), which was criticized by the opposing party for violating the Constitution. However, the People Power Party (국민의힘) also created its own satellite party, effectively taking away proportional representation seats that should have gone to smaller parties. This left candidates like Sim Sang-jung in a difficult position, as their potential parliamentary seats were diminished.

The creation of these satellite parties and the overall election system are unprecedented in world history. The very parties that created this system are now in power. The National Election Commission (중앙선거관리위원회, Jungang Seongeo Gwanwiwonhoe) has also allowed the creation of these satellite parties, despite the opposition party’s claims of constitutional violation. This raises questions about the fairness of the system, especially for smaller parties that invested significant resources to field candidates. The initial promise was to support smaller parties, but this was broken by the creation of satellite parties, which absorbed the proportional representation seats. These newly elected members then rejoined their original large parties, a move never before seen in global history.

4. The Consequences of Unethical Actions and the Principle of Retribution
   Unethical actions, particularly in politics, inevitably lead to negative consequences, a principle echoed in ancient wisdom. The former emperor of the Eastern Jin Dynasty (東晉), Emperor Xuan (宣帝), emphasized this in his final instructions: “Even a single good deed (一日行善, ilil haengseon) may not bring immediate blessings (福雖未至, bok su miji), but misfortune will automatically depart (禍自遠矣, hwa ja won yi)”. Conversely, “even a single evil deed (一日行惡, ilil haengak) may not bring immediate disaster (禍雖未至, hwa su miji), but blessings will automatically depart (福自遠矣, bok ja won yi)”. This means that while good deeds may not yield immediate rewards, they prevent future calamities, and bad deeds, though not immediately punished, will eventually lead to the loss of blessings.

The creation of proportional representation satellite parties (비례 위성 정당, birye wiseong jeongdang) is an example of such an unethical act. Those responsible for creating these parties, including the secretary-general and the members of parliament who supported it, will eventually face the consequences. he possesses a list of these individuals and their actions. He suggests that these politicians will eventually collapse (졸도, joldo) from the repercussions of their deeds.

The story of Hitler serves as a stark historical example of how past injustices can lead to catastrophic retribution. Hitler’s mother, a Jewish butcher’s maid, was repeatedly abused and exploited by her employer. Young Hitler witnessed his mother’s suffering, which instilled in him a deep-seated resentment towards Jewish people. Later, as an aspiring artist, Hitler tried to sell his paintings in a Jewish neighborhood, where he was attacked by a Jewish man’s dog and then beaten by the owner for startling his pregnant dog. This incident, combined with his mother’s experiences, fueled Hitler’s desire for revenge against Jewish people, ultimately leading to the Holocaust, where six million Jews were killed. This tragedy, according to the principle of “though the loss may not be immediate” (不見其損, bulgyeon gison), illustrates how past wrongs can lead to immense suffering for future generations.

5. The Essence of Effective Communication: Hard and Soft Approaches
   Effective communication, particularly in public outreach, involves two distinct yet complementary approaches: the hard approach (하드 어프로치, hard approach) and the soft approach (소프트 어프로치, soft approach). The hard approach focuses on direct, factual, and repetitive messaging to create strong brand recognition. For instance, constantly showing a five-star symbol (별 다섯 개, byeol daseot gae) on a stone bed (돌침대, dolchimdae) advertisement makes people associate the two, even without explicit claims of superiority. Similarly, the repeated exposure to “Daeil Band” (대일밴드) for bandages leads people to ask for it by name, even if other brands are available. This method relies on sheer repetition to embed an image or name into the public consciousness.

In contrast, the soft approach appeals to emotions and personal narratives, building a deeper connection with the audience. It involves sharing stories that evoke empathy and resonate with people’s experiences. For example, Huh Kyung-young’s life story—being born an orphan during the Korean War, working as a servant, studying under a kerosene lamp, enduring poverty, and eventually becoming a successful figure—is a soft approach. This narrative, when presented through books or dramas, can deeply move people and influence their perceptions.

The combination of both approaches is powerful. Apple’s advertising strategy exemplifies this by blending a hard, recognizable logo (the bitten apple) with a soft, emotional appeal. Their famous “1984” commercial, which depicted a woman throwing a hammer at a screen showing a rigid, blue-clad IBM, symbolized breaking free from conformity and embracing innovation. The IBM logo, with its segmented, blue letters, represented a “digital” and “prison uniform” image, which Apple contrasted with its more organic, colorful, and human-centric branding. This fusion of hard and soft elements allowed Apple to convey both its technological prowess and its emotional connection with users, leading to its success.

6. The Vision for a Just Society and the Role of God-man
   Huh Kyung-young envisions a just society where everyone, regardless of their academic or economic background, can live a dignified life. He asserts that his policies are designed to create a society where even those who struggle academically or face unemployment can marry, raise families, and honor their parents. He recognizes the plight of young people who, despite their desire to be filial, cannot find jobs or get married due to societal pressures and economic hardships. This often leads them to despair, engaging in risky behaviors like cryptocurrency trading or gambling, accumulating debt, and even contemplating suicide. Huh Kyung-young believes that many who commit suicide are, in fact, filial children who are crushed by a merciless reality.

His proposed policies aim to alleviate these burdens. He suggests providing 100 million won (약 1억 원, yak ireok won) upon marriage, 300 million won (3억 원, sam eok won) for couples, and 1 million won (100만 원, baekman won) per child for ten years. Additionally, he proposes monthly payments of 1.5 million won (150만 원, baekosipman won) to individuals, with elderly parents receiving 2.2 million won (220만 원, iibaeisipman won) each, or 4.4 million won (440만 원, sabaekssipman won) for a couple. These measures would ensure that parents have enough money to live comfortably and even support their children, fostering harmonious family relationships.

the current society, dominated by “smart” people, is breaking the spirits of ordinary citizens. He believes that his policies would transform a nation where people are forced to be unfilial (불효, bulhyo) and disloyal (불충, bulchung) into one where everyone can fulfill their duties to family and country. the current presidential election, which disregards the Constitution, is leading the nation to ruin. He urges his supporters to commit fully, like Xiang Yu (項羽) with his “smashing the cooking pots and sinking the boats” (破釜沈舟, pa bu chen zhou) strategy, to ensure his approval rating reaches 5% or 10%. He asserts that on March 9th, they will achieve victory.

The Presidential Election That Disregards the Constitution Will Ruin the Nation

1. The Unjust Electoral Process and the Call for Fairness
   For two months, candidate Huh Kyung-young, who already commanded 5.7% support, has been deliberately excluded from public opinion polls by a conspiracy involving both ruling and opposition parties, as well as the media. Had he been included, his support would now exceed 20%, currently standing at over 5.6%. Despite this, the decision to exclude Huh Kyung-young, who was then in third place, and include only the fourth and fifth-place candidates in the four-way debate, constitutes a violation of the Constitution and a clear act of human rights suppression. We shall steadfastly resist this infringement upon the fairness and equality that electoral laws are bound to uphold. We strongly urge the media and broadcasting companies to immediately include candidate Huh Kyung-young in public opinion polls and allow his participation in televised debates. Justice will prevail; should they fail to comply, the enraged public sentiment and Heaven itself will never forgive them.

2. The Spirit of Unyielding Resolve: Lessons from History
   A presidential election that fails to uphold the Constitution will inevitably lead to the nation’s ruin. While we speak of unfairness and inequality, the current situation has become excessive. Initially, I was in third place, followed by Ahn Cheol-soo in fourth, and Sim Sang-jung in fifth. However, due to my exclusion from television appearances, I fell to fourth place. Yet, they then announced that only the third and fourth-place candidates would participate in debates. The public is gradually discerning the profound unfairness of this presidential election. Therefore, we must exert our utmost effort to expose this truth to the world and overturn the presidential election results.

Consider the historical figure of Xiang Yu (項羽), the Hegemon-King of Western Chu (西楚霸王) from China. During his five-year reign, he fought seventy battles and emerged victorious in all of them. In his seventy-first battle, he suffered defeat and committed suicide on the battlefield in front of his subordinates, drawing his sword and disemboweling himself. Xiang Yu was a general of immense strength and power. Even as he governed the nation as its emperor for five years, he personally led his troops into battle whenever war erupted. Yet, he was ultimately defeated in that final, seventy-first engagement, after seventy consecutive victories. His voice was so thunderous that horses would flee in terror. Despite being a formidable martial general, he made one mistake in his seventy-first battle. His pride wounded, he took his own life before his soldiers. This demonstrates an extraordinary resolve, an unwillingness to tolerate defeat in battle. Such an indomitable spirit, akin to that of Xiang Yu, is precisely what we need as we approach the presidential election. There is no retreat; we shall never withdraw from the battlefield. We are destined for victory. How could the Creator ever face defeat? There may be moments of crisis, but the path always leads to triumph.

3. The Strategy of No Retreat: “Breaking the Cauldrons and Sinking the Boats” (破釜沈舟)
   When Xiang Yu engaged in battle, he always had a specific objective. He employed a strategy known as “Breaking the Cauldrons and Sinking the Boats” (破釜沈舟). This meant that upon entering enemy territory, he would order his soldiers to destroy their cooking cauldrons and sink their boats after crossing a river. The soldiers were astonished. This was not merely destruction; it was a declaration that there was no turning back. They had crossed the river, and their boats were submerged, leaving no means of retreat. Their cooking cauldrons were shattered, signifying that if they failed to conquer the enemy’s House, they would starve to death. This was a commitment to fight to the death. This strategy, known in Korea as baesujin (背水陣), or “lining up with one’s back to a river,” was Xiang Yu’s “Breaking the Cauldrons and Sinking the Boats.” It meant that soldiers were to enter battle with the mindset of dying, not of returning alive. The boats were destroyed, the cauldrons broken, leaving no food or escape. The message was clear: “If we fail to capture that fortress, we will perish from hunger.” This forced the soldiers to fight with absolute desperation.

4. The Unprecedented Dedication of Supporters and the Spirit of Imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退)
   Our supporters embody such a spirit. They are rapidly increasing in number, a force unprecedented in history. Have you ever seen soldiers distributing flyers at 2 or 3 AM? No. Those who work part-time are only concerned with their hourly wages. Our supporters, however, are like an army of Heaven (天軍), an angelic host (天使), unparalleled in past or future. They possess an infinite number of archangels, along with ordinary angels. This is the spirit of Imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退), the Hwarang (花郎) spirit, meaning “no retreat from battle.”

5. The Unwavering Loyalty of Baekje Generals and the Betrayal of Political Expediency
   While there is no retreat in this spirit, consider the Baekje (百濟) general who fought without retreating, leading to the death of all five thousand of his men. Such a general, a warrior of Baekje, is unparalleled in world history. Even though the King of Baekje (義慈王) may have been indulging in pleasure and misgoverning, the Baekje general fulfilled his duty to the nation. A general like Yi Seong-gye (李成桂) would have returned and dethroned King Uija. But the Baekje general did not. Despite the king’s perceived incompetence, the general, knowing he would die, took a thousand men, first beheaded his own wife and children, signifying no return. The soldiers were stunned by this act. He gathered his subordinates, executed his family before them, and never informed the king of the danger. This is the spirit that members of our National Revolutionary Party (국가혁명당) must possess.

His army of five thousand faced a hundred thousand enemy troops, yet they fought until not a single man survived. Such a spirit, embodied by the Baekje general, is unique in world history. Generals are indeed different. We must remember such individuals—those who fulfill their duties to their king, regardless of the king’s governance, without criticism or ambition for the throne. The general could have easily overthrown the king, but he did not. This is truly remarkable. The act of sacrificing his wife and children before battle—imagine the mindset of the accompanying soldiers. They were already dead men. Victory was impossible, yet they went to die for King Uija. It is a magnificent tale.

This stands in stark contrast to the current political climate, where politicians engage in nongonghaengsang (論功行賞), or “discussing merits and distributing rewards,” seeking personal gain. The ruling and opposition parties are resorting to every means to exclude Huh Kyung-young. If a candidate is among the top three, their name should be included in public opinion polls. The executives of Korean media companies who omitted my name from polls are already on my list of three thousand names. They still do not realize that Huh Kyung-young is a spiritual being (神人). They will understand after the presidential election. I have already secured that list. What can I not do while sitting here? However, until the election concludes, I will do my best. Just watch. Do you think I will remain silent afterward? While they scramble for nongonghaengsang, I am no ordinary person.

6. The Media’s Bias and the Public’s Unconscious Influence
   If they were truly principled, they would include Huh Kyung-young, regardless of external pressure. Why is the third-place candidate’s name omitted? Why is Kim Dong-yeon, who polls at 0.x%, included? They argue that Kim Dong-yeon was a deputy prime minister and might merge with the Democratic Party. This is utter nonsense. Regardless of the Democratic Party’s directives, if Huh Kyung-young is in third place, he must be included. If newspapers continue to exclude him, someone will eventually face severe consequences. There should be at least one person in the Korean media who says, “Huh Kyung-young is doing this while sitting here; how can we do such a thing?” Was there anyone in MBC, KBS, SBS, or the cable channels who insisted that Huh Kyung-young’s name be included in public opinion polls when I was polling at 5.7% in third place? No. Yet, I still achieved third place. Because they continue to exclude me, the public operates on the “law of observation.” If something is not seen, it is not perceived.

When you go to buy a bandage, do you ask for “a bandage” or “Daeil Bandage” (대일밴드)? You ask for “Daeil Bandage.” This is the power of repeated exposure. Because certain names are constantly shown, people unconsciously ask for “Lee Jae-myung Bandage” or “Yoon Seok-yeol Bandage.” This is what they are aiming for. They understand advertising techniques. The human subconscious dominates the conscious mind. If something repeatedly enters the subconscious, one unconsciously asks for “Daeil Bandage.” This is simple repetition. Grandparents might ask, “Who is that person?” Is this a fair election? Even as a preliminary candidate, I am forbidden to use my name. It cannot be used in flyers or leaflets. My face cannot appear on TV. My name cannot be mentioned in phone calls. My name cannot be used in online promotions. Who is conducting such an election? This is an illegal election. What is the National Election Commission (중앙선거관리위원회) doing? They are merely observing. When I filed an injunction, even the judiciary was already compromised. If the judiciary had a sense of justice, they would have said, “Huh Kyung-young has emerged; we have been waiting for this. Why are you circulating him like this?” They would have recognized that Huh Kyung-young was polling in third place from the beginning. Why is he not appearing? The public is now growing suspicious.

7. The Fear of Truth and the Violation of Constitutional Rights
   They fear Huh Kyung-young. Any ruling or opposition candidate who encounters Huh Kyung-young realizes that their policies are plagiarized versions of his. When the original appears, all the imitations fail. They are afraid. A judge should say, “You must include him.” But they only allocate a few seconds or tens of seconds. These are people who have lost their minds. They have not heard the public’s opinion. I am the Creator (神人), so I am fine. But my supporters are seething with anger. Their bodies are breaking down, their stomachs are churning, and they cannot eat. Is this the Republic of Korea? The electoral system of the Republic of Korea is destroying democracy. They have arbitrarily violated the five fundamental rights of the people, enshrined in the Constitution. Does the fact that I do not have five National Assembly members mean I cannot participate in debates? Why do you insist on five members? The Democratic Party is responsible for this.

8. The Illegality of Satellite Parties and the Betrayal of Public Trust
   They created satellite parties (비례 위성 정당). They created satellite parties, violating the Constitution. The opposing party protested vehemently, claiming it violated the Constitution and would dismantle it entirely. Yet, they too created satellite parties, taking all the proportional representation seats that should have gone to minor parties. This drove Sim Sang-jung to despair. She now has more than ten National Assembly members, but her party was ruined. Our votes were not counted because they created satellite parties to prevent minor parties from gaining seats. What are proportional representation and these electoral parties? This is unprecedented in world history. Those who created this are the current ruling party. The public tolerates this, and the National Election Commission encourages the creation of satellite parties. Despite the opposition clearly stating that it violates the Constitution, the Election Commission sided with the ruling party and allowed satellite parties. Why did I invest so much to field 253 candidates, believing that seats would be allocated to minor parties? Is my money and my effort not valuable? The Democratic Party initially broke its promise. What was their promise? They promised to support minor parties, and we never even dreamed of satellite parties. We spent an enormous amount of money. But then they created satellite parties, taking away the National Assembly seats that should have gone to minor parties. They sent their own members to create a party and then merged them back into their original party. This is unprecedented in world history.

9. The Law of Karma and the Consequences of Unjust Actions
   Thus, our 300 National Assembly members were prepared to follow the correct plan. But they created 180 members through such means. They have secured 1,200 National Assembly members through illegal means. Do you think such illicitly gathered power will benefit them? It will become their tomb. It will. When Emperor Donghak (東學聖帝) died, what was his final instruction? I taught you this. “Even if you do one good deed, the reward may not come immediately, but misfortune will automatically depart.” those who think, “I did a good deed today, why am I still struggling?” are mistaken. The reward may not come immediately, but disaster will stay away. Conversely, “Even if you do one evil deed, misfortune may not come immediately, but blessings will automatically depart.” I will show them this later. Do you think Huh Kyung-young will always remain as he is? He will not. Then they will experience misfortune not coming immediately, but blessings automatically departing. And then misfortune will come. They created satellite parties, thinking, “Am I the only one responsible? All our Democratic Party members agreed to this.” They will try to shift blame to others, claiming they were not involved. But remaining silent and turning a blind eye is a dereliction of duty. As National Assembly members, who create laws, why do we create such laws? This is unacceptable. Were there no such people? The opposition initially argued against it, but then they too said, “We can’t help but create them ourselves.” So they created them. The opposition initially argued that it violated three constitutional principles, but then they too said, “We can’t help but violate the Constitution; how can we gain seats otherwise?” So they secured 100 seats, and then 200, exceeding 180. They secured 200 seats through satellite parties. Creating such a system will not bring happiness.

10. The Analogy of Growth and Decay: Haengseonji (行善之) and Haengakji (行惡之)
    Haengseonji (行善之), or “the path of good deeds,” is like grass growing in a spring garden. Even if you cannot see it growing, it is steadily increasing. Just as a child grows from a toddler to a university student without their parents noticing the daily growth, good deeds accumulate imperceptibly. Conversely, Haengakji (行惡之), or “the path of evil deeds,” is like sharpening a knife on a stone. The knife gradually dulls and eventually disappears. This signifies the ruin of a household, the extinction of descendants. If a lawyer, successful in their career, chooses not to have children, they are being unfilial to their parents and disloyal to the nation. Not having children leads to the nation’s demise. It is unfilial to parents. They might say, “I am a female lawyer; why should I marry a man?” This leads to unfilial conduct in the family and disloyalty to the nation, resulting in population extinction and the disappearance of the country.

The immediate harm may not be visible. If one does not marry, parents worry, and eventually, the family line ends. The consequences will eventually manifest. Even if the harm is not immediately apparent, it accumulates daily, leading to the family’s ruin. Our ancestors’ words are never wrong. The words of Shakyamuni, Jesus, or Confucius are always true. the Divine Being (神人) does not criticize such figures. I merely organize and convey their valuable teachings to you.

11. The Seeds of Hatred: The Story of Hitler and the Holocaust
    Ultimately, why did Hitler start the war? To persecute Jews. He initiated the war to eliminate Jews, stating he had no animosity towards Asians. He only targeted the Jews. He annihilated them. When he committed suicide, what did he say? “I have fulfilled my mission. I have avenged my mother against the Jews. I have succeeded. What more is there for me to do?” This is how it unfolded. The seeds of that evil sprouted from their actions, and the descendants suffered. The current Korean election is similar. They have inflicted immense unfairness upon Huh Kyung-young, violating the Constitution. The presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the Republic of Korea. I have come to Earth to witness such things. These forces of evil are unaware of what they are doing. The most crucial aspect should be fairness in elections.

12. The Monopoly of Power and the Dereliction of Duty by the Election Commission
    They always seek to monopolize everything. If there is a capable lawyer, they want to monopolize all the good cases. They tell weaker lawyers, “You can starve; I will take everything.” It’s like large corporations monopolizing the market, leading to calls to support traditional markets, such as restricting department store operations on Sundays. Even large corporations practice coexistence. But our politicians are engaging in a complete sweep, destroying minor parties and preventing new figures from emerging. It is strange. I clearly came in third. Yet, they do not even acknowledge the public opinion polls themselves. However, the Election Commission acknowledges that Huh Kyung-young was third in public opinion polls. What has the National Election Commission done? Negligence, dereliction of duty. Why do all broadcasting and media outlets exclude the third-place candidate, Huh Kyung-young? They should send an official letter requesting fairness. But they do not. Should I send an official letter? Should I tell them to do something? Should the National Election Commission send an official letter when all media outlets exclude a third-place candidate? Should they abuse their authority? Should they rectify it? They do not. I hope the National Election Commission reflects on this for a month. I hope they remember Huh Kyung-young’s capabilities. Even if I do not become president, is there such an unfair, unjust, and negligent organization in the 21st century? I like to be humble and treat you like children. I am such a person, full of love, never seeking to deceive anyone. But do our public officials have their wits about them? The National Election Commission is a constitutional body. Even if the National Assembly, the legislative branch, sets the election rules, should the National Election Commission not intervene when fairness is compromised? Why do the current media outlets exclude Huh Kyung-young, the candidate of the National Revolutionary Party, who is polling third according to the National Election Commission? They claim it is the media’s free discretion according to election law. But should the media have such free discretion? A candidate polling above 1% should be consistently included. Kim Dong-yeon, polling at 0.3%, is consistently included. But a candidate polling at 5.7% is excluded. The National Election Commission must issue a corrective order: “Candidates polling above 1% must be consistently included.” This is what they should do. If the National Election Commission issues such an order, it becomes constitutional law, without needing National Assembly approval. The National Election Commission is a constitutional body, like the Supreme Court. Are they unaware of this? Are they just waiting for payday? I see everything. I know all their names. I will reveal them clearly later. While they engage in nongonghaengsang, I will do something else. There will be a special judgment someday, and Huh Kyung-young will be the judge. It will not be left to prosecutors. The president is the judge. Such a special judgment will be held before the nation. It will be interesting, won’t it?

13. The Prophecy of the End Times and the Arrival of the Holy Emperor
    The fact that we are being pushed into a corner signifies that this nation has reached its end. This is why it is called the “End Times” (末世). In these End Times, a Holy Emperor (聖帝) will appear. A Holy Emperor who will save you all. But you, as it is written, “see but do not perceive.” This is prophesied. I am not speaking now; I am merely informing you. I remain silent, but I am not unaware. The people of this world are complicit in this illegal election. The people of this world do not know, which is truly lamentable in these End Times. How lamentable it is.

14. Advertising Strategies: Hard Approach vs. Soft Approach
    There are two ways to convey a message. One is the “hard approach.” This is like seeing five stars on a product and immediately associating it with a “stone bed.” It is a direct, factual association. The other is the “soft approach.” This involves touching people’s emotions. What emotion does “five stars” evoke? None. When you ask for a bandage, you ask for “Daeil Bandage,” even though there are many brands. Why? Because Daeil Bandage was heavily advertised. They used a hard approach. They did not need to explain why Daeil Bandage was good. They just showed it on injuries. They did not need to say it was made with American materials or eco-friendly. That is unnecessary. Only the brand is remembered.

the image is the same, but it is about the five stars. They constantly promote stone beds, their benefits, and so on. That is unnecessary. Saying that their stone bed is the best among many in Korea is foolish. That company will fail. there is no need for a soft approach. A hard approach is needed. People need to know who Huh Kyung-young is, but they are preventing a hard approach. If all broadcasts are blocked, Huh Kyung-young has no hard approach image. This is frustrating. I am the world’s foremost expert in advertising. No advertising expert can surpass Huh Kyung-young. Those at the highest level of skill should learn from me. They learned advertising from English books. I learned everything from English. Why learn it? All advertising books are in English, so I learned it all in English.

My “soft approach” tells my life story: I was born during the Korean War, an orphan, grew up as a servant in a rural village, studied Chinese classics, completed middle and high school curricula in elementary school, and learned high school English in elementary school, all while working as a servant. I did this under a kerosene lamp when there was no electricity. At fifteen, I came to Seoul, worked in about thirty factories, sold my blood for tuition, and studied in a tent in temperatures below -30 degrees Celsius. I developed peritonitis, my stomach swollen like a pregnant woman’s. I survived thanks to a kind Buddhist monk. After experiencing all that, I became the adopted son of Korea’s first chaebol (재벌), met high-ranking officials, and eventually became a presidential candidate. I helped tens of thousands of poor people. That is my life’s soft approach.

15. The Power of Narrative: Lee Myung-bak vs. Park Geun-hye
    Someone else also uses a soft approach. But if Huh Kyung-young’s name appears on TV, that becomes a hard approach. Since there is no opportunity for both, I used a soft approach through books. Books were published. Using books for a soft approach is much slower than TV. Some people make movies from books for a soft approach. President Lee Myung-bak had a drama about him. “The Legend of a Hero.” He became president because of that drama. Park Geun-hye suffered greatly because of it. Dramas like “Rustic Period” and others appeared. Park Geun-hye lost the primary election, and Lee Myung-bak emerged. Such a growth story profoundly influences the public. Park Geun-hye had little soft approach profile. She was known because her father was president. She gained respect from the public due to her father’s legacy. That is a soft approach profile. This is not Lee Myung-bak’s case. He came from a poor rural family, went hungry in middle and high school, and worked in markets. He went hungry, sold bread, and so on. He was a self-made man. That was his soft approach. As it became known, he entered Hyundai, and his rags-to-riches story touched people’s emotions. even Park Geun-hye, with her strong hard approach profile, was defeated. Lee Myung-bak became president before Park Geun-hye. Why did a chaebol pick Lee Myung-bak? A drama writer used Lee Myung-bak as a subject for a drama. So the order changed. Lee Myung-bak came first, and then Park Geun-hye was impeached. The cause came from a writer who touched Lee Myung-bak’s soft approach. Because of that drama, Park Geun-hye became the next president, and Lee Myung-bak’s faction impeached Park Geun-hye. This led to a vendetta, and the Democratic Party benefited from it. History shows that a soft approach can have a powerful impact. Lee Myung-bak could not have become president just by his name, a hard approach. His growth story, his struggles in the market, his mother selling goods, his poor family, his malnutrition, collapsing on the street, selling honey while a high school student—this resonated with the public.

16. The Apple vs. IBM Analogy: Integrating Hard and Soft Approaches
    Look closely at the IBM logo. It is made of fragmented letters. This signifies “digital,” a repetition of ones and zeros forming IBM. But there is a flaw here; it is a mistake by the logo designers. What is contained here? The IBM logo is easy to input into a computer because it has varying lengths, connected by codes. But this is only a hard approach; it lacks a soft approach. Apple cleverly exploited this. They included IBM in their logo, but instead of fragmented letters, they connected them. The color of the “A” is the reddest, and it gradually darkens, or brightens towards the center. But IBM has no color; it is blue. IBM is like a blue prison uniform. When Apple created its advertisement, people in blue prison uniforms, representing IBM, walked out in a line. Then a woman appeared holding an apple. She threw the apple, and that was Apple. This means that the Apple logo connects the fragmented parts. They created an apple, integrating it. It was about recognizing computers, but it also incorporated the image of a fruit, an apple. This is emotional; it is a soft approach image. They combined a hard approach with a soft approach. The lines are the hard approach, and the apple is the soft approach. IBM was too rigid, while Apple harmonized with nature. hardware and software were integrated. The person who achieves this succeeds. The other fails.

This is how Apple emerged from IBM. I discovered this problem and perfectly aligned with it. The woman ran and threw the apple, and the prisoners collapsed. This means IBM collapses before Apple. The apple flew, exploded like an atomic bomb, and the prisoners vanished. This means IBM was defeated. Apple ran such an advertisement in the past, considered the best advertisement in the world.

17. The Importance of a Comprehensive Campaign: Image and Message
    When you promote a presidential election, you must understand what I am saying. You need to publicize Huh Kyung-young’s name, but you also need to convey his growth story, his soft approach. My hard approach is the flyers. The soft approach is why people like me. I suffered greatly, but I am untainted and pure. He is a true president who will make us prosperous. He studied by selling his blood and endured immense hardship. This is the soft approach image. Apple combined both hardware and software. This blue-colored Apple will be broken. IBM was broken, and Apple rose. Apple’s apple has color, with the red center shining brightly. But IBM has no color, just a single blue. IBM failed.

For us to win this presidential election, you must be intelligent. I must even teach you these lectures. I have two types of advertising: hard approach and soft approach. Two types of images. Since you do not know about images, you must understand that there are approach images. We must know this much. We must also know about Daeil Bandage. No one says, “Please give me Joongil.” They say, “Please give me Miwon.” Miwon represents Joongil. When it comes to president, it should just be “Huh Kyung-young.” like “five stars” immediately brings “stone bed” to mind, we use a symbol for promotion. my image of lifting my leg combines both hard and soft approaches. When I lift my leg, it contains two immense images: a hard approach and a soft approach. even without writing Huh Kyung-young’s name on a flyer, if it shows a person lifting their leg, people know it is Huh Kyung-young. “Kick, kick, Huh Kyung-young.” But for children, the first approach is through “levitation” (공중부양) and “teleportation” (축지법). This is the soft approach. I have captured children’s attention through advertising from a long time ago. just putting one thing is not enough. But if it were a machine-like depiction of kicking, would it work? No. Because a person is in it, people recognize that person as Huh Kyung-young. This is what is included. Why is this person wearing a hat? It means a person’s mind is complex. This is what you call Apple, but it is actually a person. A person wearing a hat, with many thoughts in their head. There is a reason why I use the image of lifting my leg. But other people just put a simple logo and say “National Revolutionary Party.” That has no image. Life must be in it. Does Apple have life? Does the National Revolutionary Party’s leg-lifting image have life? Yes, a human is in it. But do the logos of the ruling and opposition parties have people? No, they are just drawings. They only have a hard approach image, not a soft approach. You must understand this.

18. The Hardships of Huh Kyung-young’s Youth and His Vision for Society
    Now, when you give a lecture about Huh Kyung-young, you must explain how he grew up. How Huh Kyung-young suffered. And that is why he wants to give us these things. He studied through a truly tearful school life. Many people stole his books. He studied as if he were fighting for independence, because people would steal his books. He studied when others slept, but during the day, he worked in factories. He served guests at temples. He taught Sunday school at churches. He had no time to read books. he read books in the restroom. This person would go to the restroom, and when someone else came, he would be studying inside. He was studying in the restroom. when the next person would say, “Why is this guy not coming out of the restroom?” he would be studying. He studied in secret. That was a sweet pleasure. But these days, children call me and say, “President Huh Kyung-young, I have no desire to study. What should I do?” The moment I hear that, I think, “The nation is going to ruin.” our lazy youth are truly lost. I had no time to study, so I studied in secret, had my books stolen, was beaten by reporters, and was fired from thirty factories. I was fired from thirty places. It was so sad.

19. The Prophecy of the White Dragon and the Current Political Landscape
    Now, the presidential election is about 40 days away. Huh Kyung-young, the White Dragon (白龍), is waiting in the sky. But the minnows (미꾸라지) are mocking him. This is the current situation. What is next? The God-man (神人) will meet a downpour and become president. Then he will unify the world. This is what he is revealing. The title is “National Dividend” (국민배당금). Look. There was a prophecy. “The White Dragon is waiting in the sky.” But what are the minnows doing? They are laughing. No, they are crazy. Huh Kyung-young is the crazy one. They say I am crazy. This is what it is. This is my current situation before I appear. The minnows are avoiding me. The minnows are saying, “We are the leaders, we are the dragons,” before the White Dragon appears. Let’s see what kind of behavior these minnows are exhibiting these days.

Did anyone imagine Yoon Seok-yeol would become a candidate after being a prosecutor general? This means Yoon Seok-yeol never dreamed of being president. He just wanted to come out quickly and live comfortably. He was not thinking of becoming president, but he is now in that position by chance, swept up by the atmosphere and popularity, with people around him saying, ” you are the one.” Lee Jae-myung, on the other hand, always campaigned with his wife. But Yoon Seok-yeol was never alone. He never campaigned with anyone else in this election. Curious reporters asked, “Lee Jae-myung campaigns with his wife, but why do you campaign alone?” Yoon Seok-yeol lied, saying, “My wife has no interest in politics whatsoever. She is only focused on her work, so there is no reason for me to ask her to campaign with me, and even if she wanted to, there is no need.” But listening to the recording, what is Kim Keon-hee saying? “If I seize power, I will not leave alone the YouTubers who criticized us. My husband needs help with his schedule…” She said the campaign is a mess, so they should seek advice. She is doing this. She is a woman with no interest in politics.

Family matters can happen in any household. Siblings might get angry with their mother. these family issues are not that important. You broadcast this, but I do not consider such things important. People might curse their siblings, parents, or children, but in the past, family members would curse each other. We must understand that. You are broadcasting this with good intentions, but we must interpret it correctly. Many families curse each other, fight over filial piety towards parents, or ancestral rites. We do not need to discuss such matters.

Does KBS report on Huh Kyung-young? No. Ahn Cheol-soo appears quite often. Sim Sang-jung also appears, even though she is at 3%. But Huh Kyung-young is polling at 5.6%, despite being ridiculed by the media and public. Ahn Cheol-soo was originally below Huh Kyung-young two months ago. He was at 3%, below Huh Kyung-young. But while I was in the hospital with COVID-19, Ahn Cheol-soo gained some ground. What happened with the Lunar New Year debate on TV? They excluded Huh Kyung-young again. But for those of you with normal minds, who should be in that debate instead of these two? Huh Kyung-young should be there. His support is 5.6%, not 3%. this debate is a “minnows’ debate,” as Huh Kyung-young said.

Huh Kyung-young’s support will continue to rise, so he will eventually have to participate in legally mandated TV debates. What does that mean? For me to participate in TV debates, my support must exceed 10%. If it exceeds 10% and they still do not include me, we can file an injunction for a legal debate. Your voices are a bit low. There is no hope above 6%. There is no hope for the ruling or opposition parties.

20. The National Dividend and Financial Solutions
    The 299 members of the National Assembly are preparing for a large-scale rally and a tearful head-shaving ceremony. In February, as the election reaches its peak, large rallies are planned. Self-employed people do not need to do that. If Huh Kyung-young becomes president, self-employed people will receive cash during the COVID-19 pandemic. How much did the current government give to small business owners? They gave 5 million won each to 550,000 people. But are there only 550,000 self-employed people in Korea? And you fools, 30 years ago, when Huh Kyung-young said he would give money to the people, you scoffed. But now, what? You do not ask where the money comes from when they give it. Huh Kyung-young gives money through quantitative easing. He will give 1.5 million won per month. You do not understand this. Ten years ago, Korea’s national budget was about 300 trillion won. Now, it is 600 trillion won, double that. The country could run on 300 trillion won, so if we cut expenses, we can secure about 400 trillion won. 400 trillion won. And we will secure 100 trillion won through a wealth-proportional fine system, and another 100 trillion won from special businesses. And 100 trillion won by integrating taxes, and another 100 trillion won by preventing tax evasion. This totals approximately 800 trillion won. This is a conservative estimate; we can collect even more.

If we give 1.5 million won each to those over 18, let’s say 35 million people, it comes to 52.5 trillion won. Multiply that by 12 months, and it is 630 trillion won. where does this enormous amount of money come from? Look, 800 trillion won minus 630 trillion won leaves 170 trillion won. 170 trillion won remains. You ignorant fools who criticize Huh Kyung-young, 170 trillion won remains! This money can be used for things like the “Ansim Free Card” (안심 무료 카드) and marriage support. It is entirely possible. And we can use more from the national budget. But now, people ask, “Where is the money?” A public official recently embezzled 11.5 billion won. This person was caught, but how many others embezzle tens or hundreds of millions without getting caught?

21. The Inevitable Rise of Huh Kyung-young and the Fall of the Minnows
    The current TV debate is hosted by three broadcasting companies. They say it will be a four-way debate. As Huh Kyung-young is exposed to the media, more of his unknown qualities will emerge. Lee Jae-myung will participate in the debate with Yoon Seok-yeol. Currently, Yoon Seok-yeol is at 40% and Lee Jae-myung at 38%. Reporters who initially supported Lee Jae-myung will watch the debate and realize Yoon Seok-yeol is not the answer. They will start looking for other alternatives, and defectors will emerge. But Sim Sang-jung will not be an alternative. She ran in the last presidential election and participated in debates. Nothing will change. Ahn Cheol-soo is the same. people will become frustrated. They will not want to see Lee Jae-myung, and Yoon Seok-yeol seems wrong. In this situation, self-employed people will enter large-scale rallies in February. February is the peak season for the election. At this time, there will be a rally. Will these people be concerned about the presidential election? No. They will be concerned about money. In the past, when Huh Kyung-young talked about giving money, people ignored it. But now, the government is giving 5 million won, and people who did not receive it are angry. In such a situation, people will inevitably turn to money.

Currently, Huh Kyung-young cannot participate in the debates invited by broadcasting companies, but his support is 5.6%. As it continues to rise, he will eventually appear in legally mandated TV debates. If people who are already thinking in this direction hear about Huh Kyung-young’s policies, public opinion will rise dramatically. what will happen? The day will come when the dragon ascends from among the minnows.

22. The Interplay of Message and Image in Advertising
    You need to understand this. I sometimes confuse “message” and “image.” Look, “message” and “image.” I wrote “image” here. Both “image” and “message” are included. I wrote it that way because they both carry the same image. The message becomes the image. Both “message” and “image” have “age” at the end and “me” at the beginning, so they occur simultaneously. this can be called a “hard approach message” or a “hard approach image.” I sometimes make mistakes when writing this. “soft approach message.” Advertising is a message. It conveys a message. That works well, and the message contains an image. People receive Huh Kyung-young’s message and see his image. Now, what will the image become? An image change will occur. In the future, the image will be: “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa (허파).” This is the image. This is the “soft approach image.” This is the “hard approach image.” “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This will be in all our advertisements. Children will say, “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This will become a song. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This will be promoted. It will be familiar. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This will be a strong wave. this will be in every advertisement, even a single photo. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” “Huh-pa” refers to our lungs (허파), our heart. The left-wing and right-wing have no heart. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.”

23. The “Huh-pa” Slogan and Its Symbolic Meaning
    “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This is interesting. We can also say “Dae-pa” (대파, green onion) instead of “Huh-pa.” What is smaller than dae-pa? Jjok-pa (쪽파, scallion). Besides buju (부추, chives), what is the other kind of pa? Yang-pa (양파, onion). “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer.” “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer; only Dae-pa.” Dae-pa is pa. “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer; only Huh-pa.” That’s good, isn’t it? We can do that. “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer; only Huh-pa.” This will be our future hard approach message and soft approach message, which are also hard approach images and soft approach images. I often used “E” for “image,” but that was wrong. I mixed this and that. you need to understand this. when writing “image,” the “i” should be lowercase. I sometimes write it in uppercase. It should be lowercase.

why am I giving you advertising education? Advertising is like this: “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer; only Huh-pa.” Jjok-pa is the left-wing, Yang-pa is the right-wing. Westerners say that the right-wing comes from that side. “Jjok-pa, Yang-pa, no answer; only Huh-pa.” “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; only Huh-pa.” We will continuously incorporate such images into our advertisements. We have already created them. Next week, I will show you the video.

24. The Perils of a Divided Government and the Need for a Unifying Leader
    A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. If the ruling and opposition parties clash, what happens? The ruling party, the Democratic Party, has 200 members. Will the government change? Only the president changes, and the nation enters a state of chaos. The elected president from the People Power Party will demand accountability from the former Democratic Party president. The 100 Democratic Party members will immediately impeach the president. They will find various pretexts. there will be a chaotic political situation, and North Korea might see an opportunity to invade. In such a situation, should a powerful nation like the US, UK, France, China, or Russia become the UN Secretary-General? No. These five powerful nations dominate the world. The US, UK, France, China, and Russia control the world. a powerful nation should not be the UN Secretary-General. No. They let smaller countries like Korea become UN Secretary-General. That was a good decision by the UN. Why? If China became UN Secretary-General, it could become an imperialist power. If the US continuously held the position, it could lead to imperialism. to stabilize our country, who should emerge? A powerful person, or a weaker person? Someone like Huh Kyung-young, who has no National Assembly members, can mediate between the ruling and opposition parties and prevent them from fighting. This is how we can save the nation. You can see the reason. a powerful person should not emerge. No. Telling Japan to become UN Secretary-General is unacceptable. Because it is an ambitious nation. if Huh Kyung-young becomes president, the People Power Party and the Democratic Party will not fight. I will mediate between the 200 National Assembly members and the 100 National Assembly members, and you can receive what you are given. One hundred million won does not require the consent of the ruling or opposition parties; the president can give it unilaterally within two months. However, 1.5 million won per month requires National Assembly approval. Then, we can bring in the presidential candidates of the ruling and opposition parties as vice presidents. There is no such law, but we can change the law. We can form a coalition government with vice presidents and seek the consent of the National Assembly members. But what if the National Assembly members do not cooperate? What do the people want? They want to receive money quickly. They will say, “Send those politicians away.” Then, I can boldly declare a state of emergency to save the economy, asking them to step aside temporarily, and pass the law. You do not need to worry.

25. The Inevitable Rise of Huh Kyung-young in Debates and His Unmatched Policies
    I do not need to say it, but the presidential election is like a drama. Kang Yong-seok and Kim Tae-ma are not allowed. when broadcasting companies said they would do it, I said, “This will definitely happen. Just go.” If the candidates’ YouTube channels broadcast it, that is fine. Candidates debating among themselves is fine. But if broadcasting companies get involved, fairness is required, so it is not allowed. the problem is that Sim Sang-jung, with six or seven seats in the National Assembly, automatically participates in debates if she has three or more seats. Sim Sang-jung is confirmed for the debate even though her support is less than 3%. Huh Kyung-young, however, needs to have an average approval rating of over 5% for one month, from January 16th to February 14th or 15th, to participate in the three legally mandated debates. But Huh Kyung-young is consistently polling at 5.6%. I think it would be good if Huh Kyung-young appears, because Lee Jae-myung’s main policy is to distribute money through taxes. Huh Kyung-young offers the ultimate version of distributing money through taxes. Five million won or two million won is no match. As soon as Huh Kyung-young is elected, he will give 100 million won to everyone over 18, and 1.5 million won per month. How can anyone compete with that? There is no way to compete with 50 million won for marriage. There is no way to compete with money. No matter how much they promise to give money, they cannot compete with such overwhelming populism. He does not call it populism; he says it is feasible. He promises to make people free from money worries. That is the end of it. Women’s number one wish from their husbands is, “I will make sure you never have to worry about money.” It is not, “I will kill you with my bare hands.” It is, “I will make sure you never have to worry about money.” They would marry even a black man for that. You know from experience that life is about worrying about money. If someone promises to make you free from money worries, what can you say? Huh Kyung-young promises 100 million won. four people over 18 in a family would receive 400 million won. The government does not care about such things. I will give it. If Lee Jae-myung does it, it is a default. If Huh Kyung-young does it, it is a default. It is the same. Whether it is a 1,000 trillion won default or a 10,000 trillion won default, it is the same. a default is a default. Kim’s side says, “No more two-way debates, except for those broadcast by the media.” That is interesting. He speaks quite favorably of Huh Kyung-young. He already knows about the 400 million won. And he already knows that 6 million people will return. if 400 million won is revealed, 6 million people will return. Kang Yong-seok seems to have fallen.

COVID-19 cases are now exceeding 15,000 or 20,000. Almost everyone who gets tested has COVID-19. But after COVID-19, it does not come back. However, since there are many variants now, you need to get a third and fourth vaccination. we must all get vaccinated for the third and fourth time. Everyone should get vaccinated. However, those who are weak, children, and pregnant women must be careful. They can choose not to get vaccinated. if you do not get vaccinated and then get sick, it is dangerous. But if you are vaccinated and blessed, you recover faster, and it is more effective. you should get vaccinated if possible. Except for pregnant women and children, everyone should get vaccinated.

26. The Prophecy of Baekcheon Seonsaeng and the Importance of Right View
    Let’s listen to Baekcheon Seonsaeng’s song. “Huh Kyung-young, Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young. If you revere Huh Kyung-young, Heaven will send down great blessings as a sign.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young, Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young, please save the Republic of Korea.” “Otherwise, great calamities will descend.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young, the great leader of the God-man (神人). The people are still unaware, like blind men.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young. If you do not realize this, great calamities will descend, as Heaven is showing signs.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young. Only Heaven God-man (天神) Huh Kyung-young can save the Republic of Korea from this crisis, as Heaven is showing great signs.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young. I will upload his videos again.” “Heaven God-man (天神), Huh Kyung-young. Thank you. Please spread this to the whole world. Heaven is showing signs that great calamities will descend.” “Thank you. Heaven God-man (天神) Huh Kyung-young.” This person is Baekcheon Seonsaeng, the president of the American shamans. He is working diligently, and Heaven is telling him to do this. Baekcheon Seonsaeng does many such things, so when you see him, be careful.

There is something called “Right View” (正見). Then there is “Right Contemplation” (正觀). And then there is “Right Insight” (正視). If you have Right View, you can see the whole world correctly. “Right Contemplation” and “Right View” are different. The Chinese characters for “view,” “contemplation,” and “sight” all mean “to see,” but their meanings are different. “Contemplation” is used for sightseeing. When people go sightseeing, they say, ” the scenery is beautiful.” This is “contemplation.” “View” is different from “contemplation.” “Contemplation” is just seeing the external image. “View” is seeing the inner world, penetrating it. “View” is not just seeing the image; it must also see the message. it is not just a hard approach; it includes a soft approach. This is what “view” means. When we look at advertisements, we must look at them this way. When you look at Huh Kyung-young’s face, you can see him with Right View or Right Contemplation. ” he looks handsome.” “He looks a bit different from me.” That is “contemplation.” But who is Huh Kyung-young? He was born during the Korean War, starting as a servant. That is Right View. This is stronger than “contemplation.” “Contemplation” initially attracts people with image-making. Initially, people look at something because it seems different. But if I looked like Hitler, Right View would be difficult. Right Contemplation would be bad. Right Contemplation leads people in first. Right Contemplation leads people in, and then there is Right View. Then there is Right Insight. This is the second. This is the third. if you achieve Right View, the two extremes (兩邊) are already seen as one. You see both extremes. This is seeing one extreme. Right View sees both extremes. Right Insight sees not only both extremes but the whole. Right View. this only sees the image. This sees both extremes. It sees both sides of the coin. It has already seen both sides. But what is Right View? After seeing both sides, the middle path (中道) is completed. ” this is a person.” The middle path, where left and right become one, leads to a complete conclusion. That is what we call Right View. in Buddhism, there are eightfold paths, and if you have Right View, the other seven are already completed. Right View, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration. These eight paths, Right View is the first. It is the locomotive of a train. Right View pulls Right Thought, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration. If there is no Right View, you do not know Right Speech. If there is Right Effort, but no Right View, it is useless. if you have only Right View, the eightfold path is considered complete. what humans must complete before they die is Right View. Who possesses Right View? What do the current media companies possess? What they possess is “prejudice” (偏見), not Right View. Prejudice. ” that person is not from Seoul National University.” ” that person is not from a broadcasting university.” Such prejudice. ” that person has no National Assembly members.” This is not seeing both extremes; it is seeing one extreme. Even seeing both extremes cannot compare to Right View. The middle path is Right View. The middle path enters Right View. Even if you see both extremes, “What is this coin made of?” That is another question. You only saw the patterns on the front and back of the coin; that is Right Contemplation. But what material is this coin made of? How many degrees was it melted at? What is the complexity of its creation? That is Right View. Right View, Right Contemplation, Right Insight, Middle View, Two Extremes, Prejudice—among these, Right View is the ultimate. when you look at the various things that appear, when you look at Baekcheon Seonsaeng’s work, should you say, ” that’s shamanism, isn’t he crazy?” No. Yoon Seok-yeol’s wife likes shamanism. It is freedom of religion. When people look at it with prejudice, they say, ” that’s good, that’s bad.” But you should not do that. What about our grandmothers? They probably practiced shamanism. Our great-grandmothers probably went to shamans. Is that possible? Is it not in our ancestors’ subconscious? It is. Even if outwardly they are Christian, deep in their subconscious, they are descendants of people who practiced shamanism. Should you look at such things with prejudice? No. Should you look at it with two extremes? Should you look at only one extreme? No, even seeing both extremes is not enough. You must go to Middle View. And eventually, you must go to Right View. Right View. understanding and seeing things correctly is this difficult.

27. Huh Kyung-young’s Vision for a Compassionate Society
    how you package and present Huh Kyung-young’s image to the public involves these two things: soft approach and hard approach. It must be able to convey both image and message. Huh Kyung-young’s image is conveyed, and Huh Kyung-young’s message is different. “I will pay off the people’s debts of 100 million won.” “I will create a society where students who are not good at studying can still be filial to their parents.” “Young people who are not good at studying and have no jobs can marry freely and have grandchildren.” That is Huh Kyung-young’s policy. They fail exams. Or they are naturally not good at studying. But they want to be filial, but they fail job interviews. “What university did you graduate from?” So they keep failing. They want to marry quickly and become independent to show something to their parents, but they cannot even give them grandchildren, and women avoid them. I will create a society where such failing students, those who are behind, can still live well, marry, and be filial to their parents. What do you think? This is a world where only the successful live. The world I want is one where even if you are not good at studying, even if your grades are bad, a woman will say, “If we marry, we will get 300 million won.” “You have no ability, so I will starve even if I become a National Assembly member.” Such people will disappear. They want to be filial to their parents but cannot, cannot marry, and are stuck in their rooms, feeling sorry for their parents. They are living in hell. Many young people are like that. This is a disharmony between ideals and reality. They want to earn money to help their parents, who are constantly fighting over money, but then they get into cryptocurrency or gambling. Then they incur more debt. they become unfilial children, useless, but deep down, they want to save their parents. They try a hundred times, but it does not work, and it only brings more trouble to the family. More debt, more seizures on their home. their mother’s heart breaks. that young person goes to commit suicide. All those who commit suicide are filial children. But this cold reality mercilessly crushes those who are not good at studying or are behind others. I will give 100 million won and 1.5 million won per month. Then, a couple will receive 300 million won for marriage, and 1 million won per month for 10 years to raise a child. This creates a situation where any child can be filial. And the father receives 4.4 million won, the father 2.2 million won, and the 1.5 million won for the elderly, plus 700,000 won for elderly allowance. And the father receives money. They will have money left over until they die, and the father will say to his son, “You use some.” If we do not create such a society, we will be unfilial to our ancestors and elders, and we will be disloyal to the nation by not having children and not marrying. we are unfilial. And disloyal to the nation. No one wants to do this. Everyone wants to be filial to their parents, but they give 4.4 million won per month to parents who do not have much longer to live. If a father lives alone, he gets 2.2 million won. If a son does not marry, but meets his wife, they get 3 million won. His mother gets 2.2 million won. That family can live. His mother raises the grandchildren. But if a 52-year-old does not marry, has no job, and no income, and his mother also has no income. We have created such a nation, and now intelligent people are fighting, and we, the common people, are suffering. Everyone wants to be filial, but they are all being unfilial now. They are turning the elderly into vegetative states. They are confined to nursing homes, constantly worried about their sons and daughters-in-law. But if the elderly receive 2.2 million or 4.4 million won, what is there to worry about with their daughters-in-law? “You use some.” If they give it like this, the daughter-in-law and son will get along better, and since the couple gets 3 million won, they will say, “Mother, Father, you keep it and use it.” This is how our filial nation is producing unfilial children. Young-soo, you must understand. A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. You must risk your life. You understand the meaning of “Breaking the Cauldrons and Sinking the Boats,” don’t you? Risk your life, and make sure we get 5% or 10% this time. Yes, Han Min-gyu. We will surely win on March 9th. Please give a round of applause for victory. Thank you.

. The Erosion of Electoral Fairness and Equality

An egregious violation of constitutional principles has occurred in the presidential election. Despite Huh Kyung-young’s candidacy having garnered a 5.7% approval rating two months prior, a concerted effort by political parties, media, and broadcasters has systematically excluded him from opinion polls. Had he been included, his current support would likely exceed 20%, already surpassing 5.6%. The decision to exclude Huh Kyung-young, who was then the third-ranked candidate, from the four-way debate, while including the fourth and fifth-ranked candidates, constitutes a clear breach of the constitution and a blatant act of human rights suppression. We are committed to an unwavering struggle against this infringement upon electoral fairness and the right to equality. We vehemently urge the media and broadcasters to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls and television debates. Should they fail to comply, the wrath of the public and the heavens will not forgive such an injustice.

2. The Principle of Rectification of Names and Divine Justice
   The current state of affairs, where the presidential election disregards constitutional tenets, portends national decline. While we frequently discuss injustice and inequality, the current situation transcends acceptable bounds. Initially, I was ranked third, followed by Ahn Cheol-soo in fourth, and Sim Sang-jung in fifth. However, due to media exclusion, my ranking dropped to fourth. Subsequently, they announced debates featuring only the third and fourth-ranked candidates, further highlighting the profound unfairness of this presidential election, which the public is gradually discerning. Therefore, our utmost endeavor must be to expose these irregularities to the world and overturn the presidential election results.

3. The Unyielding Spirit of Xiang Yu: A Lesson in Unwavering Resolve
   Consider the historical figure Xiang Yu, a formidable general from China. Over five years, he engaged in seventy battles and emerged victorious in every single one. In his seventy-first battle, facing defeat, he chose to commit suicide on the battlefield before his troops, plunging his sword into his abdomen. This act underscored his immense strength and unwavering commitment to his nation. He led his country as an emperor, yet personally fought in wars. His ultimate defeat in the seventy-first battle, after an unbroken streak of seventy victories, was a blow to his pride. This led him to take his own life before his soldiers, demonstrating an absolute refusal to accept defeat. Such an extraordinary spirit, akin to Xiang Yu’s, is precisely what we require as we approach this presidential election. There is no retreat; we are committed to an unyielding advance. We shall prevail in every circumstance. How could the Creator ever face defeat? There may be moments of opportune timing, but the trajectory is always towards victory.

4. The Strategy of “Breaking the Cauldrons and Sinking the Boats” (Pabu Chimju)
   Xiang Yu’s military campaigns were characterized by a specific, resolute objective. Upon entering battle, he would order his soldiers to destroy their cooking cauldrons and sink their boats. This strategy, known as “Pabu Chimju” (破釜沈舟), translates in Korean to Baesujin (背水陣), meaning “making a stand with one’s back to a river.” It signifies a commitment to fight to the death, leaving no possibility of retreat. The soldiers, having crossed a river, would find their boats submerged, eliminating any means of return. Their cooking pots would be shattered, forcing them to understand that failure to conquer the enemy’s stronghold meant starvation. This instilled an absolute resolve to win or perish. This is the spirit of Baesujin, where one faces the water, not merely by turning one’s back, but by enacting Pabu Chimju. The destruction of boats and cauldrons eliminates any thought of escape, compelling soldiers to fight with ultimate determination.

5. The Unprecedented Dedication of Our Supporters
   Our supporters embody this unwavering spirit. Their numbers are rapidly increasing. They are soldiers unlike any seen before or any who will come after. Have you ever witnessed individuals distributing flyers at two or three in the morning? Those who work part-time are merely concerned with their hourly wages. Our supporters, however, are driven by an unparalleled dedication. They are like a celestial army, accompanied by countless archangels and angels. While there are ordinary angels, those who are less attractive, the beautiful ones are considered archangels. This is the human inclination, to favor the beautiful. However, the divine perspective differs. Humans tend to bestow good things upon those they favor. This spirit of unwavering commitment, known as Imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退), or “no retreat in battle,” is akin to the Hwarang spirit of ancient Korea.

6. The Unparalleled Loyalty of the Baekje General
   Consider the Baekje general who, despite his king’s indulgence in hedonism, fulfilled his duty to the nation, fighting to the death with 5,000 men against a force of 100,000. Such loyalty is unparalleled in world history. Unlike General Yi Seong-gye, who might have returned to depose the king, the Baekje general remained steadfast. He did not depose the king, even though the monarch was deemed unworthy by history. Before leading his 1,000 men into battle, knowing they faced certain death, he beheaded his own wife and children, signifying an absolute commitment to never return. His soldiers, witnessing this, were stunned. This spirit of ultimate sacrifice is what our National Revolutionary Party members must possess. The Baekje general, with his 5,000 men, faced 100,000 and perished, not a single one surviving. Such a general is unique in world history. We must remember such individuals who, regardless of their king’s governance, fulfilled their duties without criticism or ambition for the throne. His ultimate act of sacrificing his family before battle profoundly impacted his soldiers, who then fought as if already dead, knowing victory was impossible yet fighting for their king.

7. The Corrupt Practice of “Merit-Based Rewards” (Non-gong-haeng-sang)
   The current political landscape is marred by the practice of Non-gong-haeng-sang (論功行賞), or “merit-based rewards,” where positions and honors are distributed based on contributions, often through illicit means. The ruling and opposition parties are employing every conceivable method to exclude Huh Kyung-young. A candidate ranked third in opinion polls should naturally be included. The names of media executives who deliberately omitted my name from polls are already on my list of 3,000 individuals. They remain unaware of my spiritual nature. After the election, they will realize their error. I possess this information and will act when the time is right. While they scramble for rewards, I am not an ordinary person. If they were truly principled, they would include Huh Kyung-young, regardless of external pressure. Why exclude the third-ranked candidate? Why prioritize a candidate like Kim Dong-yeon, who polls at 0.X%, simply because he was a deputy prime minister or might merge with the Democratic Party? This is preposterous. Regardless of political affiliations, the third-ranked candidate, Huh Kyung-young, must be included. Not a single media outlet has advocated for my inclusion. Despite being excluded, I still achieved third place with 5.7%. Their continued exclusion of me means the public, through the “law of observation,” cannot see me.

8. The Power of Repetition in Advertising and Public Perception
   When you go to buy a bandage, you instinctively ask for a “Daeil Bandage” or “Band-Aid,” even though many brands exist. This is the power of constant exposure. The media’s continuous promotion of certain candidates, like Lee Jae-myung or Yoon Seok-yeol, makes them household names. This is a deliberate advertising strategy. Similarly, people ask for “Miwon” (a brand of MSG) instead of “monosodium glutamate.” This demonstrates how the unconscious mind, through repeated exposure, comes to dominate the conscious mind. The constant repetition of a brand name embeds it in people’s minds. This is why the exclusion of Huh Kyung-young from polls and media coverage is so detrimental. My name is prohibited from being used in flyers, online promotions, and even during phone calls. This constitutes an illegal election. The National Election Commission is failing in its duty. My legal challenge was dismissed, indicating a compromised judiciary. If the judiciary possessed integrity, they would recognize my legitimate standing. The public is growing suspicious.

9. The Fear of Huh Kyung-young’s Policies and the Violation of Constitutional Rights
   The establishment fears Huh Kyung-young because his policies are often plagiarized by other candidates. When the original appears, the copies lose their appeal. This fear drives their actions. The judiciary should intervene, but they remain passive. My supporters are seething with anger, their health deteriorating from frustration. Is this truly the Republic of Korea? This nation’s electoral system is undermining democracy itself. The five fundamental rights of the people, enshrined in the constitution, are being violated. The argument that I cannot participate in debates because I lack five National Assembly members is absurd. Why is this rule in place? The Democratic Party is responsible for this. They created “satellite parties” for proportional representation, violating the constitution. Other parties initially protested this constitutional breach but then created their own satellite parties, effectively monopolizing proportional representation seats that should have gone to smaller parties. This has marginalized figures like Sim Sang-jung, whose party has seen its representation diminish.

10. The Unprecedented Phenomenon of Satellite Parties and Their Consequences
    The creation of satellite parties for proportional representation is unprecedented in world history. The very parties that created this system are now in power. The National Election Commission has condoned this, despite initial protests from the opposition regarding its unconstitutionality. This system has deprived smaller parties of their rightful representation, despite their significant investment in fielding candidates. The Democratic Party initially promised to support smaller parties but then created its own satellite party, effectively siphoning off seats. These parties then merge back with their parent parties, a phenomenon never before seen globally. While we prepared to secure 300 National Assembly seats through legitimate means, they secured 180 seats through these manipulative tactics. Such expedient and illicit accumulations of power will ultimately lead to their downfall.

11. The Law of Karma: Good Deeds and Misfortune
    As the Emperor Donghak Seongje once said in his final admonition, “Even a single good deed may not immediately bring blessings, but it will automatically ward off misfortune. Conversely, even a single evil deed may not immediately bring misfortune, but it will automatically drive away blessings.” Those who question why good deeds haven’t brought immediate prosperity misunderstand this principle. Blessings may not arrive instantly, but calamities will recede. Conversely, misfortune may not strike immediately, but blessings will automatically depart. I will demonstrate this truth to them. Huh Kyung-young will not remain passive. They will experience the departure of blessings and the eventual arrival of misfortune. The creation of satellite parties, for which they claim collective responsibility, is a dereliction of duty. National Assembly members, who are supposed to uphold the constitution, should have opposed this. Instead, the opposition, after initially protesting, also created their own satellite parties, securing 100 to 200 seats. Such actions will not bring happiness.

12. The Analogy of Growth and Decay: The Consequences of Actions
    The principle of good deeds is like grass growing in a spring garden. Though its growth may not be visibly apparent, it steadily flourishes. Just as a child’s growth is not always perceptible day by day, yet they mature into adults, good deeds accumulate imperceptibly. Conversely, neglecting one’s duties, like a lawyer who chooses not to have children, leads to familial impiety and national disloyalty. A nation without children is doomed. Such self-centeredness, prioritizing personal careers over family and national duty, leads to demographic decline and national extinction. The immediate consequences may not be visible, but parents worry about their unmarried children, and eventually, the family line ceases. This is akin to a dulling sword, gradually losing its edge until it disappears, leading to the ruin of a household. A family line ends when children are not born. A successful lawyer who accumulates wealth but falls ill and dies without heirs leaves no legacy. This is the consequence of severing the family line.

13. The Inevitable Repercussions of Political Misconduct
    The arrogance of politicians who created satellite parties will inevitably lead to consequences. I am meticulously observing and documenting the individuals responsible: the secretary-general, the proponents, and the National Assembly members who complied. They will eventually face a reckoning. My intellect is far superior to theirs. They will collapse. Even now, they should admit their wrongdoing and include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls. It is infuriating that all media outlets conspire to exclude me. Consider the story of Hitler. His mother, a Jewish butcher’s maid, was repeatedly abused and exploited. Hitler, as a young art student, witnessed his mother’s suffering, which instilled in him a deep resentment towards Jews. Later, while trying to sell his paintings in a Jewish neighborhood, he was attacked by a dog and then beaten by its owner, who valued his pregnant dog more than a human. This experience, coupled with his mother’s plight, fueled his desire for revenge against Jews, leading to the deaths of six million. The immediate harm to the Jewish community was not apparent at the time, but the actions of that dog owner ultimately led to immense suffering for their descendants.

14. The Unseen Consequences of Injustice and the Divine Plan
    The current media executives and their descendants will face similar repercussions. I cannot fathom why some broadcasters include me while others exclude me, as if by prior agreement. Our ancestors’ wisdom holds true: the words of Buddha, Jesus, and Confucius are infallible. I am not here to criticize them but to organize and convey their timeless truths. Hitler’s war was ultimately driven by his desire to eliminate Jews, whom he held responsible for his mother’s suffering and his own humiliation. He believed he had completed his mission by eradicating them. This illustrates how the seeds of evil, sown in the past, can lead to catastrophic consequences for future generations. The current election in South Korea mirrors this injustice, with immense unfairness and constitutional violations against Huh Kyung-young. The most crucial aspect of a nation is its electoral fairness.

15. The Monopoly of Power and the Negligence of the Election Commission
    Just as successful lawyers monopolize lucrative cases, leaving weaker ones to starve, and large corporations dominate markets, our politicians are annihilating smaller parties and preventing new talent from emerging. This is an anomaly. I clearly ranked third in opinion polls, yet the polls themselves are not acknowledged. The National Election Commission has been negligent in its duty. Why is the third-ranked candidate, Huh Kyung-young, excluded by all media outlets? The Commission should issue an official letter demanding fairness. They have not. Should I send one myself? The National Election Commission, as a constitutional body, must ensure fairness, even if the National Assembly sets the election rules. They should issue a corrective order, stating that candidates polling above 1% must be consistently included. This order would have constitutional authority, akin to the Supreme Court’s rulings.

16. The Divine Judgment and the Prophecy of the End Times
    Are these officials merely waiting for their paychecks? I am observing all their actions and possess a complete list of their names. I will reveal them transparently. While they pursue their “merit-based rewards,” I am not an ordinary person. I will preside over a special judgment before the nation. This era, marked by such injustices, is precisely what is foretold as the “end times.” In these end times, a sacred emperor, the Deity, will emerge to save you. Yet, many fail to recognize this, even when it is before their eyes. This is a lamentable state of affairs.

17. The Dual Nature of Advertising: Hard and Soft Approaches
    There are two primary methods for conveying a message: the “hard approach” and the “soft approach.” The hard approach involves direct, explicit messaging, like a five-star rating on a product. It’s about direct association. The soft approach, however, appeals to emotions and sensibilities. For instance, when you ask for a “Daeil Bandage,” you are responding to a soft approach that has ingrained the brand name in your mind through repeated exposure, not through explicit claims of its superiority. The hard approach is about direct recognition, while the soft approach builds emotional connection. The media’s suppression prevents Huh Kyung-young from employing a hard approach, making it difficult for people to recognize who he is. I am a master of advertising. No one surpasses me in this field. My expertise is such that even top advertising professors should learn from me.

18. Huh Kyung-young’s Life Story: A Soft Approach Narrative
    My life story itself is a powerful soft approach narrative. Born during the Korean War, I was an orphan who worked as a servant in the countryside, studying classical Chinese, middle school, and high school curricula during my elementary years, and even high school English, all by the light of a kerosene lamp. At fifteen, I came to Seoul, worked in numerous factories, sold my blood for tuition, and studied in a tent in sub-zero temperatures, which led to peritonitis. I survived this ordeal and later became the adopted son of a prominent Korean chaebol, meeting influential figures and eventually becoming a presidential candidate. I have supported tens of thousands of less fortunate individuals. This is my life story, a soft approach. When my name appears on TV, it becomes a hard approach.

19. The Impact of Narrative: Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye
    The power of a compelling narrative is evident in political campaigns. Lee Myung-bak’s life story, depicted in a drama, profoundly influenced public sentiment. His humble beginnings, working odd jobs and struggling through poverty, resonated deeply with the public’s emotions. This “soft approach” narrative propelled him to the presidency, even over Park Geun-hye, whose “hard approach” image was primarily based on her father’s legacy. The drama about Lee Myung-bak’s life shifted the political landscape, leading to his victory and ultimately contributing to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment. This demonstrates how a powerful narrative can alter the course of history. The Democratic Party benefited from the conflict between Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye.

20. The Advertising Genius of Apple: Integrating Hard and Soft Approaches
    Consider the advertising strategy of Apple. IBM’s logo, with its segmented letters, represented a “hard approach” – digital, logical, and somewhat rigid. Apple, however, ingeniously integrated a “soft approach” into its branding. Their iconic “1984” commercial depicted a woman throwing a hammer at a screen displaying a monolithic, blue-clad figure (symbolizing IBM), shattering the rigid, corporate image. The apple logo itself, a natural fruit, embodies a soft, emotional connection. This fusion of hard (digital technology) and soft (humanity, nature) approaches led to Apple’s immense success, while IBM, with its purely hard approach, faltered. The Apple logo, with its vibrant colors, contrasts sharply with IBM’s monochromatic blue, symbolizing the difference between innovation and stagnation.

21. Applying Advertising Principles to Political Campaigns
    To achieve victory in the presidential election, we must apply these advertising principles. We need both a hard approach and a soft approach. The hard approach is the direct message, like a flyer. The soft approach explains why people should like a candidate, highlighting their struggles and purity. Apple successfully combined both. My campaign also utilizes this dual approach. My image, with me raising my leg, embodies both hard and soft elements. It’s a powerful symbol that people recognize as Huh Kyung-young, even without my name. This “kick” image, combined with the “levitation” and “teleportation” concepts, appeals to children, representing a soft approach that captures their imagination. I have always focused on capturing the attention of children through advertising.

22. The Symbolism of Huh Kyung-young’s Image and the Absence of Life in Other Parties’ Logos
    My image, with me raising my leg, is not merely a pose; it carries profound meaning. It represents a human being with a complex mind, full of thoughts and ideas. Unlike the logos of other political parties, which are mere abstract designs, my image embodies life and humanity. Apple’s logo, too, has life within it. My image, with a human figure, conveys vitality. Other parties’ logos are just symbols, lacking the soft approach of human connection. Therefore, when discussing Huh Kyung-young, we must convey both his hard-approach message and his soft-approach life story: his arduous childhood, his struggles, and his unwavering commitment to helping others. I studied relentlessly, often having to snatch books and study in secret, even in restrooms, because I had no other time. This dedication is a stark contrast to today’s youth who complain about studying.

23. The Prophecy of the White Dragon and the Minnows
    The current political climate is akin to a prophecy: a white dragon (Baengnyong) awaits its moment in the heavens, while minnows (Mikkuraji) mock it. The minnows represent the current political figures who are oblivious to the impending arrival of the true leader. Yoon Seok-yeol, for instance, never dreamed of becoming president; he was thrust into the position by circumstance and popular sentiment. He lacks a long-term vision, unlike a true leader who plans for decades. He has always been surrounded by others, never moving alone. When asked why his wife, Kim Keon-hee, did not accompany him, he falsely claimed she had no interest in politics. However, her recorded statements reveal her ambition to wield power and punish critics. While family issues are common, her political involvement is significant.

24. The Media’s Bias and the Rise of Huh Kyung-young’s Support
    The media, including KBS, largely ignores Huh Kyung-young, while giving significant coverage to candidates like Ahn Cheol-soo and Sim Sang-jung, despite their lower approval ratings. Ahn Cheol-soo’s support increased while I was recovering from COVID-19. The recent Lunar New Year debate again excluded me, despite my 5.6% approval rating, which is higher than Sim Sang-jung’s 3%. This debate was merely a “minnows’ debate.” My approval rating is projected to continue rising, eventually compelling my inclusion in legally mandated TV debates. To participate, my support must exceed 10%, at which point we can legally challenge any exclusion. The current ruling and opposition parties offer no hope.

25. Huh Kyung-young’s Economic Policies: A Solution to National Woes
    Large-scale protests by self-employed individuals are anticipated in February, the peak of the election season. These individuals are not concerned with the election itself but with their immediate financial struggles. While the government offered 5 million won to 550,000 small business owners, this is insufficient, as the actual number of self-employed individuals is far greater. Decades ago, when I proposed giving money to the public, I was ridiculed. Now, the government is doing it, but without explaining where the money comes from. My plan involves quantitative easing and monthly payments of 1.5 million won. While some question the source of such funds, our national budget has doubled from 300 trillion won a decade ago to 600 trillion won today. By reducing unnecessary spending, we can free up 400 trillion won. Additionally, 100 trillion won can be raised through a wealth-proportional fine system, another 100 trillion from special business taxes, and 100 trillion from tax consolidation and preventing tax evasion, totaling 800 trillion won. Distributing 1.5 million won monthly to 35 million adults would cost 630 trillion won annually, leaving a surplus of 170 trillion won. This surplus can fund other initiatives like free medical care and marriage support.

26. The Inevitable Exposure of Incompetence and the Ascent of the Dragon
    The current TV debates, hosted by three broadcasters, will expose the incompetence of the leading candidates. As Yoon Seok-yeol gains more media exposure, his lack of knowledge will become apparent. Lee Jae-myung, while participating, will also face scrutiny. Voters, disillusioned with both, will seek alternatives. Sim Sang-jung and Ahn Cheol-soo offer nothing new. This frustration will lead people to seek a true solution. As self-employed individuals protest in February, their focus will shift to financial relief. My policies, offering 100 million won upon election and 1.5 million won monthly, along with 50 million won for marriage, are overwhelmingly superior to any other candidate’s proposals. These are not mere populism but feasible solutions to end financial worries. As my approval rating, currently 5.6%, continues to rise, I will eventually be included in legally mandated TV debates. When I present my policies, public opinion will surge, and the “dragon will ascend from among the minnows.”

27. The Interplay of Message and Image in Advertising
    In advertising, both “message” and “image” are crucial. They are intertwined, with the message conveying an image and vice versa. My advertising strategy will incorporate both. The message “No hope for the left or right, only Huh-pa (허파)” will become our core image. “Huh-pa” (허파), meaning “lungs” in Korean, also plays on my surname, Huh. This slogan, “No hope for the left or right, only Huh-pa,” will be integrated into all our advertisements, even becoming a song. It’s a catchy, relatable message. “Jjok-pa (쪽파), Yang-pa (양파) have no hope, only Dae-pa (대파)!” “Jjok-pa” (scallions) symbolizes the left, “Yang-pa” (onions) the right, and “Dae-pa” (leeks) represents me. This playful yet profound message will resonate.

28. The Peril of Political Gridlock and the Need for a Unifying Leader
    An election that disregards the constitution will lead to national ruin. If the ruling and opposition parties, with their 200 and 100 National Assembly members respectively, remain entrenched, a change in president will only lead to chaos. The incoming president from the ruling party will face constant impeachment threats from the opposition. This political instability could even invite external aggression, such as from North Korea. In such a scenario, a powerful nation cannot lead the United Nations. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council (US, UK, France, China, Russia) cannot hold the position of UN Secretary-General, as it would lead to imperialism. Smaller nations, like Korea, are better suited. To stabilize our nation, we need a leader who is not beholden to either party. A leader like Huh Kyung-young, without National Assembly members, can mediate between the parties and unite the nation. A powerful leader would only exacerbate divisions.

29. The Path to National Prosperity: Unifying the Legislature and Empowering the People
    If Huh Kyung-young becomes president, he can harmonize the National Assembly, comprising members from both the ruling and opposition parties, to implement policies that benefit the people. While some policies, like the 100 million won initial payment, do not require parliamentary approval, the monthly 1.5 million won payments do. To achieve this, I would appoint candidates from both parties as vice presidents, forming a coalition government. If the National Assembly resists, public pressure, driven by the desire for financial relief, will compel them to cooperate. If necessary, I would declare a temporary state of emergency to pass essential economic legislation.

30. The Inevitable Rise of Huh Kyung-young in Debates and Policy Superiority
    While I was initially excluded from TV debates, my approval rating of 5.6% will soon qualify me for legally mandated debates. My policies, offering 100 million won upon election and 1.5 million won monthly, along with 50 million won for marriage, are far superior to any other candidate’s proposals. No one can compete with these benefits. My policies address the fundamental desire for financial security, a desire that resonates deeply with everyone. My promise to ensure a life free from financial worries is unparalleled.

31. The Importance of Vaccination and Spiritual Protection
    The current surge in COVID-19 cases necessitates vaccination. I urge everyone to get vaccinated, including booster shots, while exercising caution for the vulnerable, such as children and pregnant women. While my blessings offer protection, vaccination combined with blessings provides even greater efficacy.

32. The Three Stages of Perception: Gyeon, Gwan, and Si
    There are three stages of perception: Jeong-gyeon (正見), Jeong-gwan (正觀), and Jeong-si (正視). Jeong-gyeon signifies seeing the world correctly, encompassing all perspectives. Jeong-gwan involves observing the inner world, not just the superficial image, but also the underlying message. This is akin to the hard and soft approaches in advertising. When you perceive Huh Kyung-young, you can do so through Jeong-gwan or Jeong-gyeon. Jeong-gwan is about initial impressions, like finding someone handsome. Jeong-gyeon, however, delves deeper, understanding my life story from orphanhood to the present. Jeong-gwan initially draws people in, but Jeong-gyeon provides a deeper understanding. Jeong-si is the third stage.

33. The Path to Righteous View (Jeong-gyeon) and the Flaws of Prejudice
    Jeong-gyeon encompasses both sides of an issue, leading to a unified understanding. Jeong-gwan sees only one side. Jeong-gyeon, however, transcends both sides to perceive the whole. It is the ultimate stage of understanding, where all dualities merge into a complete conclusion. In Buddhism, Jeong-gyeon is the first of the Eightfold Path, and its attainment leads to the completion of the other seven. Without Jeong-gyeon, one cannot comprehend the other aspects of the path. The media, however, operates with Pyeon-gyeon (偏見), or “prejudice,” seeing only one side. They judge me based on superficial factors like my educational background or lack of National Assembly seats. This is not Jeong-gyeon but Pyeon-gyeon. Even seeing both sides (Yang-gyeon) is insufficient; one must reach Jung-gyeon (中見), or “middle view,” to understand the essence of things, not just their surface appearance. Ultimately, one must achieve Jeong-gyeon.

34. Overcoming Prejudice and Embracing a Holistic View
    It is challenging to perceive and understand things correctly. When you encounter someone like Baekcheon, who practices shamanism, you should not dismiss them with prejudice. Religious freedom is a fundamental right. Our ancestors, including our great-grandmothers, likely engaged in shamanistic practices. This is embedded in our collective unconscious. To view such practices with prejudice is to deny our heritage. We must move beyond one-sided or two-sided views and strive for Jung-gyeon and ultimately Jeong-gyeon. This holistic understanding is crucial for effectively conveying Huh Kyung-young’s image and message to the public.

35. Huh Kyung-young’s Vision: A Society of Opportunity and Filial Piety
    My message is about creating a society where even those who struggle academically can honor their parents. It’s about enabling young people, regardless of their academic achievements or employment status, to marry and have children. Many young people, despite their desire to support their parents, face rejection in job interviews due to their educational background. They feel ashamed, unable to marry or provide for their families, leading to despair and even suicide. This harsh reality crushes those who are less academically inclined. My policies, offering 100 million won upon election and 1.5 million won monthly, along with 300 million won for married couples and 1 million won per child for ten years, will create a society where everyone can be a filial child. Parents will receive 2.2 million won (or 4.4 million for couples) in elderly benefits, allowing them to live comfortably and even support their children.

36. Ending Filial Impiety and National Disloyalty
    Currently, many young people, despite their desire to be filial, are forced into filial impiety and national disloyalty due to financial hardship. They cannot marry, have children, or support their parents. This creates a society where only the “successful” thrive, while others suffer. My policies will empower young people to marry and have children, knowing they will receive substantial financial support. This will transform our nation from one where filial impiety is rampant to one where everyone can honor their parents. Elderly individuals, currently confined to nursing homes and dependent on their children, will receive sufficient funds to live independently and even assist their families. This will foster harmony between generations. An election that disregards the constitution will lead to national ruin. We must fight with unwavering resolve to achieve 5% or 10% support in this election. We will be victorious on March 9th.

The Peril of Unconstitutional Presidential Elections

1. The Subversion of Constitutional Principles in Electoral Processes
   For two months, despite my consistent 5.7% approval rating, the established political parties, media, and broadcasters have colluded to exclude my candidacy from public opinion polls. Had I been included, my support would now exceed 20%, currently standing at 5.6%. The decision to exclude me, then the third-place candidate, from the four-way debate, while including the fourth and fifth-place candidates, constitutes a clear violation of the Constitution and a blatant suppression of human rights. We shall relentlessly oppose this infringement upon the fairness and equality mandated by electoral law. I urgently call upon the media and broadcasters to immediately include my name in public opinion polls and allow my participation in televised debates. Justice will prevail; should they refuse, the wrath of the populace and Heaven itself will not forgive them. We are here to listen to the esteemed words of Huh Kyung-young, who endeavors to transform this unjust world into a fair and prosperous one, free from financial worries, filled with hope and vision.

A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will inevitably lead the nation to ruin. While we often speak of unfairness and inequality, the current situation has become excessive. Initially, I was in third place, followed by Ahn Cheol-soo in fourth, and Sim Sang-jung in fifth. However, due to my exclusion from television coverage, I fell to fourth place. Yet, they still insist on holding debates only among the third and fourth-place candidates. The public is gradually discerning the profound unfairness of this presidential election. Therefore, we must exert our utmost effort to expose this truth to the world and overturn the outcome of this election.

2. The Spirit of Unyielding Resolve: Lessons from Historical Military Strategies
   Consider the historical figure of Xiang Yu, the Hegemon-King of Chu. During his five-year reign, he fought seventy battles and emerged victorious in every single one. In his seventy-first battle, facing defeat, he committed suicide on the battlefield before his troops, drawing his sword and disemboweling himself. Xiang Yu was a general of immense strength and spirit. Even as a ruler, he personally led his forces in battle. His defeat in the seventy-first engagement, after seventy consecutive victories, was an unbearable blow to his pride. He chose death over dishonor, demonstrating an absolute refusal to accept defeat. This indomitable spirit, akin to that of Xiang Yu, is precisely what we require as we approach the current presidential election. There is no retreat; there is no surrender. We shall be victorious in all circumstances. How could the Creator ever face defeat? There may be moments of challenge, but the trajectory is always towards triumph.

Xiang Yu’s military campaigns were characterized by a specific, resolute strategy. Upon entering battle, he would order his troops to destroy their cooking pots and sink their boats. This tactic, known as “breaking the pots and sinking the boats” (破釜沉舟, pa bu chim ju), is equivalent to the Korean concept of baesujin (背水陣), or “taking a stand with one’s back to the water.” It meant that soldiers were to fight with the understanding that there was no retreat, no possibility of returning. They were to conquer or perish from starvation. This absolute commitment to victory, embracing death as the only alternative to success, is the spirit with which Xiang Yu fought.

Our supporters embody this same spirit. They are growing rapidly in number, a force unprecedented in history and unlikely to be seen again. Have you ever witnessed supporters distributing flyers at 2 or 3 AM? Paid workers merely watch the clock, concerned only with their hourly wage. Our supporters, however, are like a celestial army, a host of angels. They are boundless, encompassing both ordinary and archangels. This is the spirit of imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退), the Hwarang spirit of never retreating from battle.

Consider the Baekje general who, despite his king’s indulgence in pleasure, fulfilled his duty to the nation, fighting to the death with five thousand men against a vastly superior force. He did not retreat like General Yi Seong-gye, who would have returned to depose the king. Instead, this Baekje general, before leading his troops, beheaded his own wife and children, signifying his absolute commitment to never return alive. His soldiers, witnessing this, were stunned. This level of dedication, to die for a king, however flawed, is unparalleled in world history. We must remember such individuals. They are truly extraordinary, fulfilling their roles without criticism or ambition for the throne. Their willingness to sacrifice their families before battle demonstrates an unparalleled resolve. The soldiers who followed such a general were already dead in spirit; victory was their only path.

3. The Unjust Exclusion and Manipulation of Public Opinion
   The current political establishment, both the ruling and opposition parties, are employing every means to exclude Huh Kyung-young. A candidate consistently ranking in the top three should naturally be included in public opinion polls. The executives of Korean media outlets who have omitted my name are already on my list of three thousand individuals. They remain unaware of my spiritual nature. They believe they can simply laugh it off after the election. However, their names are recorded. While I will do my utmost until the election concludes, I am not an ordinary person. They may pursue their rewards, but I am different.

If they were truly principled, they would include Huh Kyung-young, regardless of external pressure. Why is the third-place candidate’s name omitted? Why is Kim Dong-yeon, who polls at a mere 0.x%, included? They argue that Kim Dong-yeon was a deputy prime minister and might merge with the Democratic Party. This is utter nonsense. Regardless of mergers or directives, the third-place candidate, Huh Kyung-young, must be included. Media outlets that omit my name will face consequences. Not a single person in the MBC, KBS, SBS, or cable news channels has advocated for my inclusion in public opinion polls, even when I was polling at 5.7% and in third place. Because I am continuously excluded, the public, through the “law of observation,” does not see me.

When you go to buy a bandage, you ask for a “Band-Aid,” not just “a bandage.” This is the power of constant exposure. Similarly, the continuous appearance of certain candidates in the media leads people to ask for “Lee Jae-myung bandages” or “Yoon Seok-yeol bandages.” This is a deliberate advertising strategy. The human subconscious is dominated by the conscious mind. Constant exposure to “Band-Aid” makes it stick in the mind. This is simple repetition. Yet, my name is forbidden even in preliminary candidate flyers. My face is not allowed to appear. My name cannot be used in phone calls or online advertisements. This is an illegal election. What is the National Election Commission doing? They are neglecting their duties. When I filed an injunction, even the judiciary failed to act justly. If the judiciary had integrity, they would have recognized my emergence and demanded my inclusion.

They fear Huh Kyung-young because my policies are original, and their own are mere plagiarisms. When the original appears, all imitations fail. They are afraid. Judges should demand my inclusion, not allocate mere seconds for my statements. They have not heard the public’s opinion. While I, as the Creator, can tolerate this, my supporters are seething with anger, their bodies aching, unable to eat. Is this the Republic of Korea? This nation’s electoral system is destroying democracy. They have arbitrarily violated the five fundamental rights of the people, enshrined in the Constitution. Am I excluded from debates because I lack five National Assembly members? This is absurd. The responsibility for this lies with the Democratic Party, which created satellite parties, violating the Constitution.

The opposition party initially protested this constitutional violation, but then created its own satellite party, seizing seats that should have gone to smaller parties. This is why Sim Sang-jung’s party, despite having more than ten National Assembly members, has suffered. Our votes are not being counted. The creation of proportional representation satellite parties is unprecedented in world history. Those who created this system are the current ruling party. The public tolerates this, and the National Election Commission encourages it. Despite the opposition’s clear assertion that this violates the Constitution, the Election Commission sides with the ruling party. Why did I invest so much to field 253 candidates if the initial promise to smaller parties was broken by the Democratic Party? They seized the seats meant for smaller parties, then merged them back into their main party. This is a first in world history.

The 300 National Assembly members should have been chosen through a fair process. Instead, 180 members were secured through these means. They have secured 1,200 National Assembly members. Such illicit accumulation of power will ultimately become their downfall. As Emperor Donghak Seongje said in his final admonition, “Even a single good deed may not bring immediate reward, but misfortune will automatically depart. Conversely, even a single evil deed may not bring immediate misfortune, but blessings will automatically depart.” I will demonstrate this to them. They will experience the departure of blessings and the arrival of misfortune. They created these satellite parties, claiming collective responsibility. But those who remained silent are guilty of dereliction of duty.

The National Assembly, which creates laws, should have opposed this. Yet, the opposition, after initially protesting, decided to create their own satellite parties, securing 100 seats, and then 200, exceeding 180. Such actions will not bring happiness. “Even a single good deed is like grass growing in a spring garden; though its growth is imperceptible, it steadily increases. Even a single evil deed is like a whetstone grinding away at a knife; though its wear is imperceptible, it steadily diminishes.” You cannot see your child growing day by day, but suddenly they are adults. Similarly, good deeds accumulate imperceptibly. But if you refuse to have children, claiming to be a successful lawyer, that is filial impiety to your parents and disloyalty to the nation. The population will vanish, and the nation will cease to exist.

The immediate consequences of not marrying and having children may not be apparent, but parents worry, and eventually, the family line ends. A successful lawyer who earns money but falls ill and dies without heirs leaves no legacy. The family line is severed. This is arrogance, the precursor to ruin. The creation of proportional representation satellite parties by politicians will inevitably lead to consequences. I am meticulously observing this, possessing the list of those involved: the secretary-general, the proponents, and the National Assembly members who complied. My intellect is so sharp that they will eventually collapse. They should now admit their wrongdoing and include me in public opinion polls.

4. The Historical Precedent of Retribution: The Case of Hitler
   The media’s uniform exclusion of my name is disturbing. Why did Hitler become Hitler? His mother was a maid who worked for a Jewish butcher. The butcher repeatedly raped and abused her, withholding her wages. Hitler, then a young art student, often saw his mother weeping upon her return. He understood the cause of her sorrow. Despite his artistic and gentle nature, he endured. His rallies and speeches demonstrated a keen artistic sensibility. He painted fifty pictures and tried to sell them. At that time, the German economy was controlled by Jews; they were the wealthy class. He went to a Jewish home to sell his paintings, but the owner’s dog bit him. When he kicked the dog in self-defense, the owner, enraged that he had startled his pregnant dog, beat Hitler with a stick while the dog continued to bite his leg.

This incident fueled Hitler’s desire for revenge against the Jews. He killed six million Jews, committing atrocities. Though the immediate harm to the Jews was not apparent at the time of the incident, their descendants suffered immensely because a dog was valued more than a human. The Jewish owner tore up Hitler’s paintings, which were further damaged by the dog. This trauma from his youth led Hitler to vow to eradicate the Jewish people, leaving no one alive. His mother had suffered at the hands of a Jew, and he himself was injured by a Jewish man’s dog, leaving him with a slight limp. Yet, he received no legal recourse or proper medical treatment. His descendants would suffer. Do the current media executives, their children, and their descendants not fear me? I cannot comprehend their actions. Some broadcasters include me, others do not, yet they all act as if by agreement.

Our ancestors’ words are never wrong, whether they be those of Shakyamuni, Jesus, or Confucius. I merely organize and convey their timeless wisdom. Hitler ultimately waged war to eliminate the Jews. He declared no animosity towards Asians, only towards the Jews. He decimated them. Before his suicide, Hitler stated that he had fulfilled his mission, avenging his mother and successfully eliminating the Jews. He felt he had nothing more to do. The seeds of their evil actions bore fruit in their descendants. The current Korean election mirrors this. I have been subjected to immense inequality and a violation of the Constitution. An election that disregards the Constitution will destroy the Republic of Korea. I have come to Earth to witness these things, as these forces of evil are unaware of their own actions.

Elections must be the most fair. They should discover talent, but instead, the powerful monopolize everything. Just as a successful lawyer takes all the good cases, leaving weaker lawyers to starve, or large corporations dominate markets, our politicians are destroying smaller parties and preventing new figures from emerging. It is strange. I clearly ranked third in public opinion polls, yet they refuse to acknowledge it. The National Election Commission itself stated that I was third. What has the Election Commission done? They have been negligent and derelict in their duty. Why do all media outlets exclude the third-place candidate, Huh Kyung-young? They should send an official letter demanding fairness. But they do not. Should I send them one?

The National Election Commission must remember my capabilities. Even if I do not become president, is there any organization in the 21st century that is so unequal, unfair, and derelict in its duties? The National Election Commission is a constitutional body. Even if the National Assembly sets the electoral rules, the Election Commission must intervene when fairness is compromised. Why do the media outlets exclude Huh Kyung-young, who is polling third according to the National Election Commission? They claim it is their discretion under electoral law. But should media outlets have such discretion? Candidates polling above 1% should be consistently included. Kim Dong-yeon, at 0.3%, is consistently included, but I, at 5.7%, am excluded. The National Election Commission must issue a corrective order, mandating the inclusion of all candidates polling above 1%. This order would have constitutional authority, even without National Assembly approval.

Are they merely waiting for payday? I see everything. I know all their names. I will reveal them clearly. They may seek their rewards, but I will act differently. I will hold a special judgment before the public, and I, the President, will be the judge. This is why the nation is facing such a predicament, leading to the prophecy of a holy emperor appearing in these degenerate times. You, however, see but do not recognize. This is all predetermined. I remain silent, but I am not unaware. The world’s people are complicit in this illegal election. How lamentable that the world does not recognize this in these degenerate times.

5. The Science of Persuasion: Hard and Soft Approaches in Advertising
   There are two methods for conveying a message. One is the “hard approach,” where an image, like five stars, is directly associated with a product, such as a stone bed. The image is directly linked to the product. The other is the “soft approach,” which appeals to human emotions. Five stars do not evoke emotion. When you ask for a “Band-Aid,” you are not asking for a specific brand, but the generic term has become synonymous with the product due to constant advertising. The media has consistently promoted certain brands. This is a hard approach; there is no need to explain why a Band-Aid is good. It is simply presented as the solution for wounds. There is no need to mention its materials or environmental friendliness. Only the brand matters.

Similarly, people need to know who Huh Kyung-young is, but the hard approach is being suppressed. Broadcasters are blocking my image, preventing a direct association. This is frustrating, as I am a master of advertising. No advertising expert can rival me. Even top professors of advertising should learn from me. They learn advertising from English textbooks, but I have mastered it. The soft approach involves telling my life story: born during the Korean War, an orphan, studying classical Chinese while working as a servant, completing middle and high school curricula in elementary school, and high school English in elementary school, all by the light of a kerosene lamp. At fifteen, I came to Seoul, worked in thirty factories, sold blood for tuition, and studied in a tent in sub-zero temperatures, developing peritonitis. I survived thanks to a Buddhist monk. After experiencing such hardships, I became the adopted son of a prominent Korean conglomerate founder, met influential people, and eventually became a presidential candidate. I helped tens of thousands of impoverished people. This is my life story, my soft approach.

When my name appears on TV, that becomes the hard approach. Since I lack opportunities for both, I have used books for the soft approach. Books are less impactful than TV. Some even make movies or dramas about my life. President Lee Myung-bak had a drama about his life, which significantly impacted the election, causing Park Geun-hye to lose the primary. His story of growing up poor, selling bread, and working his way up resonated with the public’s emotions. Park Geun-hye, on the other hand, had little soft appeal; she was known through her father. Lee Myung-bak’s soft approach, his rags-to-riches story, captivated the public. This is why he won the presidency before Park Geun-hye. The power of a drama writer’s portrayal of Lee Myung-bak’s life changed the course of history. This led to the conflict between Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye, from which the Democratic Party ultimately benefited. History shows that the soft approach can have a profound impact. Without the soft approach, Lee Myung-bak’s name alone would not have made him president. His humble beginnings, his mother selling goods in the market, his malnutrition, all resonated deeply with the public.

Consider the IBM logo. Its fragmented letters represent digital technology, a hard approach. But Apple cleverly utilized this. They incorporated the IBM logo into their advertisement, but instead of fragmented letters, they used connected ones, symbolizing integration. The colors also changed, becoming brighter towards the center. IBM’s logo was blue, like a prisoner’s uniform. Apple’s advertisement showed people in blue prisoner uniforms, representing IBM, walking in a line. Then, a woman appeared, holding an apple, and threw it. This symbolized Apple’s soft approach, integrating nature and emotion with technology. The apple, a fruit, represented a softer image. This fusion of hardware and software led to Apple’s success, while IBM declined. This advertisement, considered one of the best ever made, showed the prisoners collapsing as the apple exploded, symbolizing IBM’s defeat.

When you promote my candidacy, you must understand these two approaches. You must convey my name (hard approach) and my life story (soft approach). My flyers are the hard approach. The reason people like me, despite my hardships, is my purity. I am the one who will make this nation prosperous. My difficult past, studying while having books stolen and being expelled from factories, all by the light of a kerosene lamp, is part of my soft approach. I studied in restrooms because I had no other time. When young people tell me they have no desire to study, I realize the nation is in decline. I had no time to study, so I studied in secret, enduring beatings and expulsions.

My image, with my leg raised, combines both hard and soft approaches. It contains two powerful images. Even without my name, people recognize it as Huh Kyung-young’s. For children, the initial approach was through “levitation” and “teleportation,” which is a soft approach. I have captured the hearts of children through advertising. My image, with the hat, represents a mind full of thoughts. The apple logo, though a fruit, represents a human mind. My raised leg image has a purpose. Other parties’ logos are mere drawings, lacking life. My logo, like Apple’s, has life; it contains a human element. Other parties’ logos are merely hard images, lacking the soft element.

You must understand this. When you give my lectures, you must explain my growth, my hardships, and my intention to help the people. I studied amidst tears and struggles, often having my books stolen. I studied when others slept, working in factories during the day, helping monks, and teaching Sunday school. I had no time to read, so I read in restrooms. This was a luxury for me. When young people tell me they have no desire to study, I realize the nation is in decline. I had no time to study, so I studied in secret, enduring beatings and expulsions.

6. Prophecies and the Current Political Landscape
   A prophecy speaks of a white dragon (백룡, baengnyong) waiting in the heavens, while minnows (미꾸라지, mikkuraji) mock it. The minnows represent the current political figures. Yoon Seok-yeol, for instance, never dreamed of becoming president. He was thrust into the position by circumstance and popularity. He lacks a long-term vision. Lee Jae-myung, on the other hand, has always had a clear political path. Yoon Seok-yeol has never campaigned with his wife, claiming she has no interest in politics. However, leaked recordings reveal his wife’s political ambitions, threatening those who criticized them. Family issues are not paramount.

The media does not cover Huh Kyung-young. Ahn Cheol-soo and Sim Sang-jung, despite lower approval ratings, are included in debates. I was polling higher than Ahn Cheol-soo two months ago, but during my absence due to COVID-19, his numbers rose. I was again excluded from the Lunar New Year debate. This is a debate of minnows. My approval rating is 5.6%, and it will continue to rise. Once it exceeds 10%, I will legally be able to participate in televised debates. If they still exclude me, we can file an injunction. The current ruling and opposition parties offer no hope.

The current government gave 5 million won to 550,000 small business owners. But there are far more small business owners in Korea. Thirty years ago, when I proposed giving money to the people, I was ridiculed. Now, they are doing it, but without questioning where the money comes from. I propose a monthly payment of 1.5 million won. Our national budget was 300 trillion won ten years ago; now it is 600 trillion won. By reducing unnecessary spending, we can save 400 trillion won. Additionally, 100 trillion won can be raised through a wealth-proportional fine system, another 100 trillion from special businesses, 100 trillion from tax consolidation, and 100 trillion from preventing tax evasion. This totals 800 trillion won. If we pay 1.5 million won monthly to 35 million people over 18, it amounts to 630 trillion won annually. This leaves 170 trillion won for other programs like free childcare and marriage support. This is entirely feasible.

Public officials are embezzling billions of won. This is just what is caught. Many more go undetected. The upcoming TV debates, hosted by three broadcasters, will feature four candidates. As Yoon Seok-yeol is exposed to more media, his shortcomings will become apparent. Lee Jae-myung will also participate. Currently, Yoon Seok-yeol is at 40% and Lee Jae-myung at 38%. After the debates, some of Yoon Seok-yeol’s supporters will become disillusioned and seek alternatives. Sim Sang-jung and Ahn Cheol-soo offer nothing new. People will become frustrated. Meanwhile, small business owners will hold large protests in February, the peak election season. They will be focused on money, not the election. The government’s 5 million won payment has angered those who did not receive it. This will turn people towards me.

Though I was excluded from the invited debates, my approval rating is 5.6%. As it rises, I will legally be included in televised debates. When I present my policies, public opinion will surge. The white dragon will ascend amidst the minnows. My message and image are intertwined. Advertising is a message, and that message contains an image. My image will change to “Left-wing, Right-wing, No Answer; Huh-wing.” This will be incorporated into all my advertisements and songs. “Left-wing, Right-wing, No Answer; Huh-wing.” This will resonate with the public. “Green onions, onions, no answer; green onions.” This is a play on words. “Small green onions (쪽파, jjokpa) and onions (양파, yangpa) have no answer; big green onions (대파, daepa) do.” Small green onions represent the left, onions the right, and big green onions represent me. This will be shown in my advertisements next week.

An election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. If the ruling and opposition parties, with 200 and 100 seats respectively, remain in power, the nation will fall into chaos, even with a new president. The ruling party’s president will be impeached by the opposition. This instability could invite an invasion from North Korea. Powerful nations like the US, UK, France, China, and Russia dominate the world. They should not hold the position of UN Secretary-General, as it could lead to imperialism. Smaller nations like Korea are better suited. Similarly, to stabilize our nation, a powerful figure should not emerge. Someone like Huh Kyung-young, without National Assembly members, can mediate between the parties and save the nation. A powerful figure would only exacerbate conflict.

If I become president, I can reconcile the ruling and opposition parties, and the people will receive their benefits. While the 100 million won payment does not require National Assembly approval, the monthly 1.5 million won does. I can appoint the presidential candidates of other parties as vice presidents, forming a coalition government to secure National Assembly approval. If they refuse, the public, desiring immediate financial relief, will demand their removal. Then, I can declare a state of emergency to pass the necessary laws.

Sim Sang-jung, with 6 or 7 seats, is included in debates because candidates with 3 or more seats are automatically included, despite her approval rating being below 3%. I, however, need to maintain an average approval rating of over 5% for a month to participate in the three legal debates. My current rating is 5.6%. If I participate, I can easily counter Lee Jae-myung’s tax-funded cash handouts. I propose 100 million won upon election for everyone over 18, and 1.5 million won monthly. Additionally, 50 million won for marriage. No one can compete with these overwhelming populist policies. I call them feasible, not populist. Women’s number one desire is to be free from financial worries. I will make that a reality.

I will give 100 million won to each person over 18. A couple would receive 200 million won. Four family members would receive 400 million won. I will provide 1 million won per child for ten years. This is my policy. My policies are not about bankruptcy. Whether it’s 1,000 trillion or 10,000 trillion, bankruptcy is bankruptcy. My policies are not about bankruptcy.

We must all get vaccinated for COVID-19, except for the weak, children, and pregnant women. Vaccination, combined with my blessings, will be even more effective.

7. The Three Levels of Perception: Jeonggyeon, Jeonggwan, and Jeongsi
   Baekcheon, the head of American shamans, is diligently promoting me. When you observe such things, you must be careful. There are three levels of perception: jeonggyeon (正見, right view), jeonggwan (正觀, right observation), and jeongsi (正視, right gaze). Jeonggyeon allows one to see the world correctly. These Hanja characters all mean “to see,” but their meanings differ. Jeonggwan is like sightseeing, merely observing the scenery. Jeonggyeon is different; it involves penetrating the inner world, seeing not just the image but also the message. It encompasses both the hard and soft approaches in advertising.

When you look at my face, you can do so with jeonggyeon or jeonggwan. Jeonggwan is merely observing my handsome appearance. Jeonggyeon is understanding my life story, from orphan to presidential candidate. Jeonggyeon is more powerful. Jeonggwan initially attracts people with an appealing image. If I looked like Hitler, jeonggwan would be negative. jeonggwan draws people in first, then jeonggyeon follows. The third level is jeongsi.

Jeonggyeon means seeing both sides of an issue, achieving a balanced perspective. Jeonggwan sees only one side. Jeonggyeon sees both sides and then reaches a complete conclusion, a “middle way.” In Buddhism, the Eightfold Path begins with jeonggyeon. If you have jeonggyeon, the other seven elements are naturally fulfilled. Jeonggyeon leads the way. Without jeonggyeon, you cannot understand right speech or right effort. Jeonggyeon alone is sufficient to complete the Eightfold Path.

The media today suffers from pyeongyeon (偏見, prejudice), not jeonggyeon. They judge me based on superficial factors like my educational background or lack of National Assembly seats. This is pyeongyeon. Even yanggyeon (兩見, seeing both sides) is insufficient; it cannot reach junggyeon (中見, middle view). Junggyeon is the middle way. Even if you see both sides of a coin, you still don’t know its composition or weight. That is junggyeon. Jeonggyeon is the ultimate level of understanding.

When you observe things, like Baekcheon’s shamanic practices, you should not judge with pyeongyeon, thinking it is mere superstition. Everyone has freedom of religion. Our ancestors, our great-grandmothers, likely practiced shamanism. It is embedded in our collective unconscious. Judging it with pyeongyeon or yanggyeon is wrong. We must reach junggyeon and ultimately jeonggyeon. Understanding things correctly is difficult.

Therefore, how you package and present my image to the public is crucial. It requires both the soft and hard approaches, conveying both my image and my message. My message is to forgive the people’s debts of 100 million won. I want to create a society where even students who struggle academically can honor their parents. Young people who struggle to find jobs can marry and have children. Those who fail exams or lack natural talent, but wish to honor their parents, often face rejection in interviews. They cannot give their parents grandchildren or find partners. Such struggling individuals, those who are academically behind, should still be able to live, marry, and honor their parents.

This is the society I envision. Currently, only the privileged thrive. I want a world where even those who struggle in school can marry, knowing they will receive 300 million won. No one will say, “You have no ability, so I will starve even if I become a National Assembly member.” Young people who want to honor their parents but cannot, who cannot marry and hide in their rooms, feeling guilty, are living in hell. This is a disconnect between ideals and reality. They want to earn money to help their parents, but end up gambling or investing in cryptocurrency, accumulating more debt, bringing more trouble to their families. This leads to suicide. Many who commit suicide are filial children, but this harsh reality crushes those who are academically or socially disadvantaged.

I will give 100 million won and 1.5 million won monthly. A couple would receive 300 million won for marriage, and 1 million won per child for ten years. This will enable everyone to be filial. Parents will receive 4.4 million won monthly, or 2.2 million won if living alone. A son and his wife would receive 3 million won. The family would thrive. Mothers would raise their grandchildren. Parents would have money to spare and tell their children to use it. This would improve relations between in-laws. This is how we can transform a nation of unfilial children into a nation of filial piety.

Currently, many elderly people are treated like vegetables in nursing homes, constantly worried about their children and daughters-in-law. If they received 2.2 or 4.4 million won, they would not need to worry. They could tell their children to use the money. This would improve family relations. We are creating a nation of unfilial children instead of filial ones. An election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. We must risk our lives to ensure my approval rating reaches 5% and then 10%. We will be victorious on March 9th.

1. Unfairness in the Presidential Election

For two months, Huh Kyung-young, a candidate with a 5.7% approval rating, has been deliberately excluded from opinion polls by a collusive effort involving political parties, media, and broadcasters. If he had been included, his current approval rating would likely exceed 20%, and it is already over 5.6%. The decision to exclude Huh Kyung-young, who was third in the polls at the time, and include only the fourth and fifth-place candidates in the four-way debate, constitutes a violation of the Constitution and a clear act of human rights suppression. This infringement upon the fairness and equality mandated by election laws will be resisted until the very end. The media and broadcasters are strongly urged to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls and TV debates. Justice will prevail; if they refuse, the enraged public and Heaven will not forgive them. A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will lead the nation to ruin. The current level of unfairness and inequality is excessive. Initially, I was third, Ahn Cheol-soo was fourth, and Shim Sang-jung was fifth. However, because I was not featured on TV, I dropped to fourth place. Now, they are arranging debates only for the third and fourth-place candidates. The public is beginning to realize how unfair this presidential election is. Therefore, we must do our utmost to expose this to the world and overturn the presidential election.

2. The Spirit of Unwavering Determination
   The story of General Xiang Yu from China illustrates the spirit required. Xiang Yu fought 70 battles over five years and won every single one. In his 71st battle, he suffered a defeat and committed suicide on the battlefield in front of his troops, stabbing himself with his sword. This demonstrates Xiang Yu’s immense strength and unwavering resolve. Even as a powerful general who governed the nation for five years, he personally led his troops in battle. His defeat in the 71st battle, after 70 consecutive victories, was a blow to his pride. He chose to die rather than accept defeat. This spirit of never retreating, known as Imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退), is essential for us in this upcoming presidential election. We must never retreat; we will always emerge victorious.

Xiang Yu’s strategy involved a unique approach before battle, known as Pabu Chimju (破釜沈舟), which translates to “breaking the cauldrons and sinking the boats.” He would order his soldiers to destroy their cooking cauldrons and sink their boats after crossing a river. This meant there was no turning back, no food, and no retreat. The soldiers were forced to fight with the understanding that victory was their only option; otherwise, they would starve or be unable to return home. This is equivalent to the Korean military strategy of Baesujin (背水陣), or “making a stand with one’s back to a river.” It signifies a commitment to fight to the death. Our supporters possess this same spirit. Our supporters are rapidly increasing in number, unlike any seen before or since. They distribute flyers at 2 or 3 AM, not for money, but out of conviction. They are like an army of Heaven soldiers and angels. This unwavering spirit, Imjeonmutoe, is the essence of the Hwarang spirit, meaning there is no retreat in battle.

The Baekje general, who fought to the death with 5,000 men against 100,000, exemplifies this. Despite King Uija’s indulgence in pleasure, the general fulfilled his duty to the nation. Unlike General Yi Seong-gye, who might have returned to overthrow the king, the Baekje general chose to fight to the death. He even beheaded his wife and children before leading his troops, signifying that there would be no return. This act shocked his soldiers and instilled in them a similar resolve. This spirit is what is needed among the members of our National Revolutionary Party. Such a general, who sacrifices everything for his king, regardless of the king’s governance, is unparalleled in world history. We must remember such individuals.

3. Unfair Election Practices and Media Bias
   The current political parties are resorting to all means to exclude Huh Kyung-young. A candidate who is consistently ranked among the top three should naturally be included in opinion polls. The names of media executives who deliberately excluded my name from polls are already on my list of 3,000 individuals. They still do not realize that Huh Kyung-young is a spiritual being. They will understand after the election. I will not remain silent. While they pursue their self-serving interests, I am not an ordinary person. If they were truly principled, they would include Huh Kyung-young, regardless of external pressure. Why is the third-place candidate’s name omitted? Why is a candidate polling at 0.X% like Kim Dong-yeon included instead? They justify it by saying Kim Dong-yeon was a deputy prime minister and might merge with the Democratic Party. This is absurd. Regardless of political affiliations, if Huh Kyung-young is third, he must be included.

Not a single media outlet in Korea, including MBC, KBS, SBS, and cable channels, advocated for my inclusion when I was polling at 5.7% and ranked third. Because I am continuously excluded, the public operates on the “law of observation.” If something is not seen, it is not perceived. Just as people ask for “Daeil Band” instead of “band-aid” due to constant exposure, the public is constantly exposed to certain candidates, leading them to ask for “Lee Jae-myung band” or “Yoon Seok-yeol band.” This is a deliberate advertising strategy. The human subconscious is influenced by the conscious mind. Constant exposure to “Daeil” makes it stick in the mind. This is not a fair election. My name is prohibited from being used in flyers and online promotions. This is an illegal election. What is the National Election Commission doing? They are neglecting their duties. When I filed an injunction, the judiciary also failed to act justly. They should have recognized my standing.

The other candidates fear Huh Kyung-young because his policies are often plagiarized. When the original appears, the copies lose their appeal. This is why they are afraid. The judges should have intervened. My supporters are seething with anger, their bodies aching, unable to eat. Is this the Republic of Korea? This nation’s electoral system is destroying democracy. The five fundamental rights of the people, enshrined in the Constitution, are being violated. Am I excluded from debates because I don’t have five National Assembly members? This is irrational. The Democratic Party is responsible for this situation, having created satellite parties. They violated the Constitution, and other parties protested. Yet, the People Power Party also created its own satellite party, taking away seats that should have gone to smaller parties. This is why Shim Sang-jung’s party suffered. This creation of satellite parties is unprecedented in world history. The National Election Commission has allowed and even encouraged this, despite protests from the opposition that it violates the Constitution.

4. The Principle of Retribution and Its Consequences
   The principle of Haengseonjiin (行善之因) states that even a single act of goodness may not bring immediate reward, but it will ward off misfortune. Conversely, Haengakjiin (行惡之因) states that even a single act of evil may not bring immediate misfortune, but it will drive away good fortune. Those who created these satellite parties will eventually face the consequences. I am meticulously observing and documenting the individuals involved, including the secretary-generals and those who advocated for these actions. They will eventually collapse. They should admit their wrongdoing and include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls.

Consider the case of Hitler. His mother was abused by a Jewish butcher, and Hitler, as a young art student, witnessed her suffering. Later, when he tried to sell his paintings in a Jewish neighborhood, a Jewish dog bit him, and the owner beat him, destroying his artwork. This fueled his deep-seated resentment towards Jewish people, leading to the Holocaust, where six million Jews were killed. The suffering of those six million was a consequence of the earlier injustices. Similarly, the descendants of those who are now acting unfairly will face retribution. I cannot comprehend why some broadcasters include me while others, as if by agreement, exclude me. Our ancestors’ wisdom holds true: the words of Buddha, Jesus, and Confucius are never wrong. I am here to clarify and organize their teachings for you.

Hitler’s war was primarily motivated by his desire for revenge against the Jewish people. He believed he had completed his mission by avenging his mother and eliminating the Jews. The current election in South Korea is creating a similar cycle of injustice. Huh Kyung-young is being subjected to immense inequality, and the Constitution is being violated. A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. The most crucial aspect of a nation is a fair election, which allows for the discovery of talent. However, the powerful are monopolizing everything, just as successful lawyers take all the good cases, leaving weaker ones to starve. Large corporations are encouraged to coexist with traditional markets, but politicians are destroying smaller parties and preventing new figures from emerging.

The National Election Commission is neglecting its duty by not intervening when all media outlets exclude the third-place candidate. They should issue an official request for fairness. The National Election Commission is a constitutional body, like the Supreme Court. Even if the National Assembly sets election rules, the Commission must ensure fairness. They should issue a corrective order to include all candidates polling above 1%. The Commission’s directives are constitutional, even without parliamentary approval. They are merely waiting for their paychecks. I know all their names, and their actions will be revealed. They may seek rewards, but I am not an ordinary person. I will preside over a special judgment before the nation. This era is a “degenerate age” where a “sacred emperor” is destined to appear to save the people. Yet, many fail to recognize this.

5. Advertising Strategies: Hard Approach vs. Soft Approach
   There are two main approaches to advertising: the hard approach and the soft approach. The hard approach involves direct, repetitive messaging. For example, constantly showing a “five-star” symbol for a stone bed makes people associate the symbol with the product, even without explicit claims of its quality. Similarly, people ask for “Daeil Band” because of its constant exposure, not because they’ve been told it’s superior. The hard approach focuses on brand recognition through repetition.

The soft approach, on the other hand, appeals to emotions and human connection. It tells a story that resonates with people. For example, the story of Lee Myung-bak’s humble beginnings, his struggles, and his rise from poverty touched the public’s emotions, making him a popular candidate despite Park Geun-hye’s strong political lineage. His life story, presented through a drama, created a powerful soft approach image that overshadowed Park Geun-hye’s hard approach image as the daughter of a former president. This emotional connection played a significant role in his electoral success.

Apple’s advertising strategy also exemplifies the combination of hard and soft approaches. IBM’s logo, with its fragmented, blue letters, represented a rigid, digital, almost “prison uniform” image. Apple, however, used a simple, natural image of an apple, symbolizing integration and harmony. Their famous “1984” commercial depicted a woman throwing an apple at a screen showing a rigid, blue-toned figure, symbolizing the breaking free from the oppressive, hard-approach world of IBM. This combined the hard approach of a recognizable logo with the soft approach of emotional appeal and a narrative of liberation.

For Huh Kyung-young, both hard and soft approaches are crucial. The hard approach involves disseminating his name and policies. The soft approach involves sharing his life story: his birth during the Korean War, his orphanhood, his struggles as a servant, his self-education under difficult conditions, his numerous factory jobs, and his eventual rise to meet influential figures and become a presidential candidate. These narratives evoke empathy and connect with people on an emotional level. My image of raising my leg in a kick is designed to incorporate both hard and soft approaches simultaneously. It’s a recognizable symbol (hard) that also conveys a sense of dynamism and human presence (soft). Children, in particular, are drawn to the soft approach of “levitation” and “teleportation,” which I use to capture their imagination.

The logos of other political parties often lack this human element; they are merely abstract designs. Our logo, with the image of a person, embodies life and humanity. This is the difference between a mere hard-approach image and one that integrates a soft approach. My message is not just about policies like giving 100 million won to citizens or 1.5 million won monthly. It’s about creating a society where even those who struggle academically or professionally can still lead fulfilling lives, marry, have children, and honor their parents. It’s about ensuring that young people who feel like failures due to societal pressures can find hope and purpose.

Currently, society is structured for the “successful.” My vision is a world where even those who are not academically brilliant can marry and receive support, like 300 million won for marriage and 1 million won per month for ten years for raising children. This would allow everyone to be a dutiful child to their parents. Without such a society, we fail our ancestors and our nation by not having children. Many young people today want to be filial but cannot due to financial struggles, leading to despair and even suicide. My policies aim to alleviate this suffering, ensuring that parents receive adequate support (e.g., 2.2 million won for a single parent, 4.4 million won for a couple, plus 700,000 won in elderly benefits), allowing them to live comfortably and even support their children. This would transform a nation of “unfilial children” into one where everyone can be filial.

6. The Importance of Right View
   In Buddhism, the concept of Jeonggyeon (正見), or “Right View,” is paramount. It means seeing the world correctly, not just superficially. There are different levels of seeing: Jeonggwan (正觀), which is like observing scenery; Jeonggyeon (正見), which involves deeper insight into the inner world; and Jeongsi (正視), which encompasses a holistic understanding. Jeonggwan is the initial attraction, like finding someone handsome. Jeonggyeon goes beyond that, understanding a person’s background and struggles, like my story of growing up as an orphan during the Korean War. Jeonggyeon is stronger than Jeonggwan.

The media often operates with Pyeonggyeon (偏見), or “prejudice,” judging individuals based on superficial factors like education or political affiliation. They fail to see the deeper truth. Jeonggyeon involves seeing both sides of an issue and then arriving at a balanced, central perspective. It’s not just about seeing the front and back of a coin (Yanggyeon), but understanding its composition, weight, and intricate design. Jeonggyeon is the ultimate stage of understanding, leading to the completion of the Eightfold Path in Buddhism. Without Jeonggyeon, other virtues like Right Speech or Right Effort are meaningless.

When evaluating figures like the Baekcheon Seonsa (백천선생), who is a spiritual leader, one should not approach it with prejudice or superficial judgment. Our ancestors, including our great-grandmothers, often engaged in shamanistic practices, and these influences are deeply embedded in our collective unconscious. To dismiss such practices with prejudice is to ignore a part of our heritage. We must move beyond Pyeonggyeon and Yanggyeon to achieve Jeonggyeon, which allows for a complete and unbiased understanding.

Therefore, in promoting Huh Kyung-young, it is crucial to combine both hard and soft approaches, conveying both his image and his message. His message is not just about financial policies but about creating a society where everyone, regardless of their background or academic achievements, can live with dignity, marry, raise families, and honor their parents. This is a society where even those who are not considered “successful” by conventional standards can thrive. This is the vision I offer

What is the core message of this lecture? Disregarding the constitution in a presidential election will ruin the country, as the current election process is unfair and violates human rights.

1. Unfair Presidential Election and Constitutional Violations
   The current presidential election is unfair and violates the constitution, as candidate Huh Kyung-young is being excluded from polls and debates despite his high approval ratings.

1.1. Exclusion of Huh Kyung-young from Polls and Debates
Huh Kyung-young, despite being the third-highest-ranked candidate, has been unfairly excluded from public opinion polls and TV debates by political parties, media, and broadcasters.
Two months prior, his approval rating was 5.7%, and it has since risen to over 5.6%, even exceeding 20% if properly included.
The decision to include only the fourth and fifth-ranked candidates in debates, while excluding Huh Kyung-young, is a clear violation of the constitution and human rights.
This infringement on fairness and equal rights in the election process will be challenged.
The media and broadcasters are urged to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in public opinion polls and TV debates.
Failure to comply will result in public outrage and divine judgment.
An election that disregards the constitution will lead to the nation’s downfall.
The current level of unfairness and inequality is excessive.
Huh Kyung-young was initially ranked third, followed by Ahn Cheol-soo as fourth and Sim Sang-jeong as fifth.
However, due to his exclusion from TV coverage, Huh Kyung-young’s ranking dropped to fourth, yet he was still excluded from debates involving the third and fourth-ranked candidates.
The public is beginning to recognize the unfairness of this presidential election.
Therefore, efforts must be made to expose this injustice and overturn the election results.

1.2. The Spirit of “No Retreat” in the Face of Injustice
The spirit of “no retreat” is essential in the current political climate, drawing parallels to historical figures who demonstrated unwavering resolve in battle.

The story of General Hwang Woo illustrates a spirit of unwavering determination and no retreat.
General Hwang Woo fought 70 battles over five years and won every single one.
In his 71st battle, he lost and committed suicide on the battlefield in front of his troops, demonstrating his refusal to accept defeat.
This powerful general, who led the nation for five years, would personally fight in wars.
His voice was so loud that horses would flee in terror.
This spirit of “no retreat” is necessary for the upcoming presidential election.
Huh Kyung-young believes that with this spirit, victory is always possible.
General Hwang Woo’s “destroy the cooking pots and sink the boats” strategy exemplifies a commitment to victory at all costs.
Before entering battle, Hwang Woo would order his troops to destroy their cooking pots and sink their boats.
This strategy, known as Baesujin in Korea, meant there was no turning back; soldiers had to fight to win or die of starvation or be unable to return home.
This extreme measure instilled a do-or-die mentality, ensuring soldiers fought with maximum effort.
The destruction of boats meant no escape, and the destruction of cooking pots meant no food unless they conquered the enemy’s stronghold.

2. Unwavering Resolve and Unfair Election Practices
   The unwavering resolve of supporters and historical generals is contrasted with the current unfair election practices, where Huh Kyung-young is systematically excluded from media coverage and polls.

2.1. The Unwavering Resolve of Supporters and Historical Generals
Huh Kyung-young’s supporters demonstrate a unique and unwavering dedication, akin to General Hwang Woo’s soldiers.
His supporters are rapidly increasing and are unlike any seen before or since, working tirelessly even in the early hours of the morning to distribute flyers without pay.
This dedication is compared to an army of “Heaven soldiers” and “angels.”
Huh Kyung-young humorously notes that while women receive “archangel” status, men only receive “general angel” status, reflecting human nature, though divine beings are different.
The spirit of “no retreat” (Imjeonmutoe) is a core principle, exemplified by historical figures like the Baekje General.
This principle means never backing down in battle.
The Baekje General, despite his king’s misrule, fulfilled his duty as a general, leading 5,000 men against 100,000 enemy troops.
Before going to battle, he killed his own wife and children to show his troops that there was no return, inspiring them to fight to the death for their country.
This act of ultimate sacrifice, unprecedented in world history, demonstrates a profound sense of duty and honor.
The general and his soldiers were already “dead men” in spirit, making victory impossible but their sacrifice honorable.
This contrasts with those who seek personal gain or rewards (Nongonghaengsang) from war.
The current political parties are accused of using unfair tactics to exclude Huh Kyung-young from the election.
Both ruling and opposition parties are allegedly colluding to sideline Huh Kyung-young.

3. Media Bias and Constitutional Violations in the Election
   The media’s deliberate exclusion of Huh Kyung-young from polls and debates, despite his high ranking, is a severe constitutional violation, exacerbated by the creation of satellite parties that undermine fair representation.

3.1. Media’s Deliberate Exclusion of Huh Kyung-young
Media outlets are intentionally omitting Huh Kyung-young from public opinion polls, despite his consistent third-place ranking.
Huh Kyung-young claims to have a “death list” of 3,000 media executives who are complicit in this exclusion.
He warns that after the election, he will not remain silent about these injustices.
any truly ethical media outlet would include him, regardless of external pressure, given his consistent third-place standing.
The media’s justification for excluding Huh Kyung-young is criticized as hypocritical and biased.
They mock his concepts like “levitation” and “縮地法 (chukjibeop, teleportation),” which he presents as exercises for children, not literal claims.
He questions why candidates with less than 1% support, like Kim Dong-yeon, are included in polls while he, with 5.7%, is not.
The excuse that Kim Dong-yeon was a deputy prime minister or might merge with the Democratic Party is dismissed as irrelevant to fair polling.
The systematic exclusion creates a “law of observation” effect, where the public only recognizes candidates frequently shown in the media.
Just as people ask for “Daeil Band” instead of “band-aid” due to constant exposure, voters are influenced by what they repeatedly see.
This constant exposure to other candidates, while Huh Kyung-young is hidden, manipulates public perception.
The media’s actions are seen as illegal election practices, with the National Election Commission failing to intervene.

3.2. Constitutional Violations and the Role of Satellite Parties
The fear of Huh Kyung-young’s policies and the unconstitutional creation of satellite parties by major political factions are undermining democratic principles and fair elections.

Other candidates fear Huh Kyung-young because his policies are seen as the “original” versions of their own, threatening their appeal.
His supporters are deeply frustrated by the unfairness, feeling physically ill and unable to eat.
This situation is seen as a betrayal of democracy and a violation of citizens’ five fundamental rights.
The rule requiring five National Assembly members for debate participation is criticized as unfair and a result of the Democratic Party’s actions.
The creation of satellite parties (비례 위성 정당) by the Democratic Party, and subsequently by the People Power Party, is a violation of the constitution.
These satellite parties unfairly absorb proportional representation seats that should go to smaller parties, effectively eliminating their representation.
This practice, unprecedented in world history, has severely impacted smaller parties like Sim Sang-jeong’s, reducing their parliamentary seats.
The National Election Commission is criticized for allowing and even encouraging the creation of these unconstitutional satellite parties, siding with the ruling party.

4. Consequences of Unethical Political Practices and the Importance of “Right View”
   Unethical political practices, such as the creation of satellite parties, will inevitably lead to negative consequences, emphasizing the importance of “right view” in understanding complex issues and avoiding biased judgments.

4.1. The Inevitable Consequences of Unethical Political Practices
The creation of satellite parties, despite being unconstitutional, was adopted by both major parties, leading to a distorted political landscape.
The initial promise to allocate proportional representation seats to smaller parties was broken by the Democratic Party, which then created its own satellite party.
This led to the People Power Party also creating a satellite party, resulting in major parties monopolizing seats meant for smaller parties.
This unprecedented maneuver allowed them to secure a disproportionate number of parliamentary seats, effectively undermining fair representation.
Such unethical actions will ultimately lead to negative repercussions for those involved.
Just as good deeds may not bring immediate rewards but ward off disaster, bad deeds may not bring immediate punishment but drive away good fortune.
Huh Kyung-young warns that those who created these satellite parties will face consequences, as he has a list of all individuals involved.
He criticizes National Assembly members for their dereliction of duty in allowing these unconstitutional laws to pass.
Both ruling and opposition parties, despite initially opposing the unconstitutional nature of satellite parties, eventually created their own to secure more seats.
The analogy of “grass growing in a spring garden” illustrates how negative consequences, like positive ones, may not be immediately visible but accumulate over time.
Just as a child’s growth is not noticed daily but becomes apparent over years, the effects of actions, good or bad, accumulate.
He criticizes individuals who prioritize personal success (e.g., a female lawyer choosing not to marry or have children) over contributing to family and nation, leading to societal decline.
This is likened to a knife gradually dulling and disappearing, symbolizing the eventual downfall of a family or nation that neglects its fundamental duties.
Such arrogance and self-centeredness are seen as precursors to ruin.

5. The Power of Advertising and the Importance of “Right View”
   The power of advertising, encompassing both “hard approach” (direct messaging) and “soft approach” (emotional connection), is crucial for political campaigns, while the concept of “right view” is essential for discerning truth amidst biased media.

5.1. The Power of Advertising and Huh Kyung-young’s Campaign Strategy
the importance of effective advertising, combining both “hard approach” and “soft approach” strategies.
The hard approach involves direct, repetitive messaging, like a brand name becoming synonymous with a product (e.g., “Daeil Band” for band-aids).
The soft approach appeals to emotions and creates a deeper connection, such as a candidate’s life story.
Huh Kyung-young’s personal story of overcoming extreme poverty and hardship, including working multiple jobs, studying under difficult conditions, and suffering from peritonitis, is a powerful soft approach.
He also highlights his journey from an orphan to a successful individual who helped many, eventually leading him to politics.
His “levitation” and “縮地法 (chukjibeop, teleportation)” concepts, initially presented to children, serve as a soft approach to capture their imagination.
The media’s suppression of Huh Kyung-young’s “hard approach” prevents him from effectively communicating his message.
without media exposure, his name and image cannot be widely disseminated.
He has resorted to using books as a “soft approach” to share his story, though it is less impactful than TV exposure.
Historical examples, like the rise of Lee Myung-bak and the fall of Park Geun-hye, demonstrate the power of the “soft approach” in politics.
Lee Myung-bak’s humble background and rags-to-riches story, popularized through a drama, resonated deeply with the public, overshadowing Park Geun-hye’s more privileged image.
This emotional connection, a “soft approach,” ultimately led to Lee Myung-bak’s presidency and later contributed to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment.
The Apple logo is presented as a successful example of combining “hard” and “soft” approaches in advertising.
IBM’s logo, with its fragmented, digital appearance, represents a “hard approach” focused on technology.
Apple’s logo, a bitten apple, combines the “hard approach” of technology with the “soft approach” of nature and emotion.
An old Apple advertisement depicted people in blue “prison uniforms” (representing IBM) being liberated by a woman throwing an apple, symbolizing Apple’s triumph over IBM.
This blend of logic and emotion is key to success.
Huh Kyung-young’s campaign uses a unique image of him lifting his leg to combine both “hard” and “soft” approaches.
This image, even without his name, is instantly recognizable as Huh Kyung-young, conveying both his physical prowess and a deeper message.
In contrast, other political parties’ logos are merely abstract images without human connection or deeper meaning.
Huh Kyung-young’s life story, marked by extreme hardship and a relentless pursuit of knowledge, is a powerful “soft approach” message.
He studied under unimaginable conditions, often stealing books and studying in secret, even in restrooms, because he had no other time or resources.
He criticizes modern youth for complaining about studying, seeing it as a sign of national decline.

5.2. The Concept of “Right View” (正見) in Understanding the World
The Buddhist concept of “right view” is crucial for understanding the world without bias, moving beyond superficial observations to grasp the true nature of things.

“Right View” (正見) is the highest form of understanding, surpassing “Right Observation” (正觀) and “Right Seeing” (正視).
Right Seeing (見) is a superficial glance, like seeing a beautiful landscape.
Right Observation (觀) involves a deeper look, like noticing details in a landscape.
Right View (見) penetrates to the inner world and message, combining both “hard” and “soft” approaches to advertising.
For example, seeing Huh Kyung-young’s face and thinking he is handsome is “Right Observation,” but understanding his life story from an orphan to a leader is “Right View.”
“Right View” leads to a complete understanding, unifying opposing perspectives and achieving a balanced “middle way.”
It moves beyond simply seeing both sides of an issue (like both sides of a coin) to understanding its true essence and underlying nature.
In Buddhism, “Right View” is the first and most important of the Eightfold Path, as it guides all other aspects of spiritual development.
The media often operates with “prejudice” (偏見) rather than “Right View,” leading to biased reporting.
They judge Huh Kyung-young based on superficial factors like his educational background or lack of parliamentary seats, without understanding his deeper message or history.
This “prejudice” prevents them from achieving a balanced “middle way” (中道) in their reporting.
It is important to avoid prejudice when evaluating individuals or beliefs, such as the practice of shamanism.
Criticizing someone’s religious beliefs, like Yoon Seok-yeol’s wife’s interest in shamanism, is a form of prejudice.
Shamanism is deeply rooted in Korean ancestral history and unconscious beliefs, so judging it with prejudice is inappropriate.
True understanding requires moving beyond superficial judgments to a “Right View.”

6. Huh Kyung-young’s Vision for a Fair and Prosperous Society
   Huh Kyung-young’s vision is to create a fair and prosperous society where everyone, regardless of academic or professional success, can live with dignity, marry, raise families, and care for their parents, thereby ending the cycle of despair and promoting filial piety.

6.1. Policies to Support All Citizens and Promote Filial Piety
Huh Kyung-young’s policies aim to create a society where even those who struggle academically or professionally can live fulfilling lives.
He proposes policies that would allow individuals who are not academically successful or cannot find jobs to marry, have children, and care for their parents.
He seeks to eliminate the shame and despair felt by young people who cannot achieve traditional markers of success, leading them to risky behaviors like cryptocurrency speculation or gambling, and even suicide.
His policies include providing 100 million won per person, 1.5 million won monthly, 50 million won for marriage, and 1 million won per child for 10 years.
These policies would empower individuals and families, fostering filial piety and national well-being.
With such financial support, children could provide for their parents, and parents would have enough money to live comfortably and even help their children.
This would transform a society where many feel like “unfilial children” into one where filial piety is naturally practiced.
It would also address the declining birthrate and promote marriage, preventing the nation from becoming “unfaithful” to its future.
The current system, driven by the conflicts of “smart” politicians, harms ordinary citizens and creates a society of “unfilial children.”
Elderly people are often neglected, confined to nursing homes, and dependent on their children, leading to a loss of dignity.
Huh Kyung-young’s policies would give the elderly financial independence, improving family relationships and their quality of life.
an election that disregards the constitution will ruin the country.
He urges supporters to fight with the “destroy the cooking pots and sink the boats” spirit to ensure he reaches 5% or 10% in the polls.

1. The Unconstitutional Election and National Crisis

An unconstitutional presidential election will lead our nation to ruin. For two months, despite Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating of 5.7%, the ruling and opposition parties, along with the media, have colluded to exclude him from opinion polls. If he had been included, his support would likely exceed 20% by now, and it is currently over 5.6%. Excluding Huh Kyung-young, who was third in the polls at the time, and including only the fourth and fifth-place candidates in the four-way debate, is a clear violation of the Constitution and a blatant suppression of human rights. We will fight to the end against this infringement on fairness and equality, which are fundamental principles of election law. We strongly urge the media to immediately include Huh Kyung-young in opinion polls and TV debates. Justice will prevail; if they refuse, the enraged public and Heaven will never forgive them. We are honored to welcome Huh Kyung-young, who promises to transform this unjust world into a fair and prosperous one, free from financial worries, and we will listen attentively to his valuable words of hope and vision.

2. The Spirit of Unyielding Determination: Lessons from History
   We often speak of unfairness and inequality, but this situation has gone too far. I was initially in third place, followed by Ahn Cheol Soo in fourth, and Shim Sang Jung in fifth. However, because I was not featured on TV, I fell to fourth place. Now, they claim that only the third and fourth-place candidates will debate. The public is slowly realizing how unfair this presidential election is. Therefore, we must do our utmost to expose this to the world and overturn the presidential election.

Consider the story of Empress Jang Sa of China. She fought 70 battles over five years and won every single one. In her 71st battle, she was defeated and committed suicide on the battlefield. She drew her sword and stabbed herself in front of all her subordinates. Empress Jang Sa was a general of immense strength. Even as she governed the nation for five years as empress, she would personally lead her troops into battle. Yet, she lost that final battle. She had won 70 consecutive battles, never once being defeated. Her voice was so powerful that horses would flee in terror. She would draw her sword, and her soldiers would collapse in fear. She hardly needed to wield her sword herself. Such was the might of this renowned general. Yet, she made one mistake in her 71st battle. Her pride was wounded, and she chose to die by her own hand in front of her soldiers. This demonstrates an extraordinary resolve; she would not tolerate defeat in battle.

This kind of mental fortitude, like that of Empress Jang Sa, is what we need as we approach this presidential election. There is no retreat. We will not withdraw from the battlefield. We will be victorious in any circumstance. How could the God-man ever be defeated? There may be moments of crisis, but victory is always the direction. I should not worry about such things.

Empress Jang Sa had a specific purpose when she went to war. This character, “Bu,” means “pot” or “cauldron,” like in the city of Busan. When Empress Jang Sa went to war, she would destroy her own cooking pots. Her soldiers’ pots were all smashed with axes. The soldiers were naturally astonished. After destroying the pots, she would then sink their boats, which they had used to cross the river, into the water. This spirit of “destroying the pots and sinking the boats” is what we call “Baesujin” in Korea, meaning “taking a stand with one’s back to the water.”

This is the spirit of Baesujin. Empress Jang Sa called it “Pa Bu Chim Ju” (破釜沈舟, literally “break the cauldrons and sink the boats”). This is the resolve with which she fought. When Empress Jang Sa went into battle, her soldiers were not to think of survival but of death. They had no boats to return across the river, and their cooking pots were destroyed. She would tell her soldiers, “If we fail to capture this House, we will starve to death. Be prepared.” This meant they could not retreat. They had to win or die. This is Baesujin. It means fighting with your back to the water, but not just any back-to-the-water stance; it’s Pa Bu Chim Ju. If there were boats, soldiers might think of escaping. That was unacceptable. The boats were burned, sunk, and completely eliminated. “If we fail to conquer that fortress, we will be exposed and die of hunger.” This was the message. to survive, they had to win. This is how she motivated her soldiers.

Our supporters possess such a spirit. Our supporters are growing rapidly. They are soldiers unlike any seen before or since. Have you ever seen soldiers distributing flyers at 2 or 3 AM? No. Part-timers only care about their hourly wage. They might distribute flyers for three hours and then leave. But our soldiers bring flyers home and then take them out again, or leave them on the streets. Our soldiers are like an army of Heaven, angels unlike any before or since. We have an infinite number of archangels. There are ordinary angels, and then there are archangels for those who are more attractive. Do men need archangels? No, they get ordinary angels. Archangels are only for women, with certain conditions. We are fighting a war, but we do so with a sense of humor. This is human nature. But God-man is different. Humans tend to give good things to women, and women give good things to men.

This spirit is called “Imjeonmutoe” (臨戰無退, “no retreat from battle”). It is the spirit of the Hwarang warriors: never retreating from the battlefield. However, the Baekje general, fighting without retreat, saw all 5,000 of his men die. That was also acceptable. It’s better to die gloriously. There is no general in the world like the Baekje general. Even though the King of Baekje was indulging in pleasure and misgoverning, the Baekje general fulfilled his duty to the nation. A general like Yi Seong Gye would have returned and dethroned King Uija. But the Baekje general did not. Even for a king who was not highly regarded by history, he went to his death, knowing it, and before leading 1,000 men, he first beheaded his own wife and children, signifying that there would be no return. The soldiers were stunned by this. He gathered his subordinates, beheaded his family in front of them, and did not inform the king of the danger. This is the spirit that members of our National Revolutionary Party must possess.

His 5,000 soldiers fought against 100,000 enemy troops, and not a single one survived. Such a spirit, like that of the Baekje general, is unprecedented in world history. He was an extraordinary person. Generals are different. We must remember such people. They truly fulfill their duty as generals for their king, regardless of whether the king governed well or poorly. He did not criticize the king or attempt to usurp the throne. As the last general of Baekje, he could have easily overthrown the king, but he did not. This is truly remarkable. The fact that he killed his own wife and children before battle—imagine the state of mind of the soldiers who followed him. At that point, both the general and his soldiers were already dead. Victory was impossible. Yet, they went to die for King Uija. It’s magnificent.

This is not about seeking rewards or positions. Those who engage in such schemes are corrupt. They are trying to divide up positions and rewards. The ruling and opposition parties are using every means possible to exclude Huh Kyung-young. If someone is in the top three, their name should be included in opinion polls. Yet, not a single Korean media outlet has included my name. The executives of those media outlets are already on my list of 3,000 targets. They still don’t realize that Huh Kyung-young is a spiritual being. They think they can laugh after the presidential election, but I already have all their names. What can I not do sitting here? I will do my best until the election is over. Just watch. Do you think I will do nothing afterward? Heaven is not like them. They may be scrambling for positions and rewards, but I am not an ordinary person. If they were truly human, they would include Huh Kyung-young, regardless of pressure from above. Why is the third-place candidate’s name not included? Why is my name excluded? Political editors, come here. Why did you exclude Huh Kyung-young? Is he a ghost? Try to levitate, you fools. I tell children to exercise. Our ancestors used to levitate, jump over trees, and use “Chukjibeop” (縮地法, a mythical ability to shorten distance) when there were no cars. That’s what our ancestors did. I tell children to emulate levitation and Chukjibeop, to work hard. What’s wrong with that? Why do some people mock Huh Kyung-young’s levitation and Chukjibeop? You fools, why is Huh Kyung-young, who is third, excluded from opinion polls? Why do you favor Kim Dong Yeon, who gets 0.something percent? You should be asking that. ” Kim Dong Yeon was a deputy prime minister, and he might merge with the Democratic Party, so we should include him.” You damn fools! Whether the Democratic Party orders it or not, if Huh Kyung-young is third, you must include him. If newspapers keep excluding him, whose heads will roll later? There should be at least one person in the Korean media who says, “Huh Kyung-young is doing this while sitting here. What will happen to me if I don’t include him?” Was there anyone in MBC, KBS, SBS, or the cable channels who said, “We must include Huh Kyung-young in the opinion polls”? Even when I was third with 5.7%, they should have included me. But they didn’t, and I still came in third. But because they keep excluding me, the public follows the “law of observation.” They don’t see me.

If you go to buy a bandage, what do you ask for? “Give me a bandage,” or “Give me a Band-Aid,” or “Give me a Daeil Band-Aid.” Why? Because Daeil Band-Aid is constantly advertised. people ask for “Lee Jae Myung Band-Aid” or “Yoon Suk Yeol Band-Aid.” They are aiming for this. They don’t understand advertising techniques. Or, if you want “Mi Won” (a brand of MSG), you ask for “Mi Won,” not “Jomil” (a generic term for seasoning). Because “Mi Won” is constantly advertised. This is how the human subconscious mind dominates the conscious mind. If something repeatedly enters the subconscious, you unconsciously ask for “Daeil Band-Aid.” It’s simple repetition. Grandparents might ask, “Who is that person?” Is this a fair election? No. Even as a preliminary candidate, I’m not allowed to use my name. I can’t use it on flyers. My name doesn’t appear on TV. My face isn’t shown. I can’t use my name in phone calls or online promotions. Who is doing this to me? This is an illegal election. What is the National Election Commission doing? They are neglecting their duty. When I filed an injunction, the judiciary was already corrupted. If the judiciary had a sense of justice, they would have said, ” Huh Kyung-young has emerged. We’ve been waiting for someone like you. You’re the only one who can break this cycle.” They should have recognized Huh Kyung-young from the moment he reached third place. Why isn’t Huh Kyung-young, this “monster,” appearing? The public is now becoming suspicious.

3. The Fear of Truth and the Violation of the Constitution
   They are afraid of Huh Kyung-young. Any candidate from the ruling or opposition party who encounters Huh Kyung-young will find their policies plagiarized. When the original appears, all the copycat “restaurants” fail. They are afraid. Judges should say, “You, candidate, should debate.” But instead, they give a few seconds or tens of seconds. These people are out of their minds. They haven’t heard the public’s opinion. I am fine with this because I am God-man. But my supporters are boiling with anger. Their bodies are breaking down, their stomachs are churning. They can’t eat. Is this Korea? Korea’s electoral system is destroying democracy. They have arbitrarily violated the five fundamental rights of the people, which are enshrined in the Constitution. because I don’t have five National Assembly members, I can’t participate in debates? You fools! Why do you need five members? Why is it that I don’t have five members? The Democratic Party is responsible for that. They created satellite parties for proportional representation. They created these satellite parties and violated the Constitution. The opposing party protested, saying it violated the Constitution and they would take it to the Constitutional Court. they created these satellite parties, violating the Constitution, and it caused an uproar. But then, the People Power Party also created their own satellite parties, taking all the proportional representation seats that should have gone to minor parties. That’s why Shim Sang Jung went crazy. That’s how Shim Sang Jung ended up. She now has more than 10 National Assembly members. But Shim Sang Jung was completely ruined. Her number of National Assembly members decreased. Our National Assembly members always run away. Minor parties could have had many National Assembly members if they had nominated 253 candidates, with 50 women and 77 others. But because they created satellite parties, our votes don’t count.

What are proportional representation and these election parties? This is unprecedented in world history. The ones who created this are the current ruling party. The public tolerates this, and the National Election Commission even encourages the creation of satellite parties, saying, ” wonderful!” Even though the opposition party clearly stated that it violated the Constitution, the Election Commission sided with the ruling party and allowed the creation of satellite parties. why did I invest so much to nominate 253 candidates, believing they would be given to creative minor parties? Is my money and my effort not valuable? The Democratic Party broke their promise from the beginning. What was their promise? They said they wouldn’t create satellite parties. We couldn’t even dream of creating satellite parties. We nominated candidates for minor parties, and a huge amount of money was spent. But then, they created satellite parties, taking away the National Assembly seats that should have gone to our minor parties. They sent their own National Assembly members and created a party to represent the people. Then, those National Assembly members rejoined their original party. This is unprecedented in world history. we prepared to have 300 National Assembly members according to the original plan. But they created 180 National Assembly members this way. They secured 1,200 National Assembly members. Do you think what they gathered through illegal means will benefit them later? It will become their grave. It will.

When Emperor Donghak Seongje died, what was his last instruction? I taught you this. “Even if you do one good deed a day, blessings may not come immediately, but misfortune will automatically go far away.” if someone thinks, “I did a good deed today, so why am I living so poorly?” they are mistaken. Blessings may not come immediately, but disaster will stay far away. However, if you do one bad deed a day, misfortune may not come immediately, but blessings will automatically go far away. I will show them this later. Do you think Huh Kyung-young will always be like this? Huh Kyung-young will not always be like this. Then, misfortune will not come immediately, but blessings will automatically go far away. And then, misfortune will come. They created these illegal satellite parties, thinking, “Am I the only one responsible? All our Democratic Party National Assembly members knew about it.” They try to shift the blame to other National Assembly members and claim they are innocent. Did they close their eyes? That’s dereliction of duty. As National Assembly members, who create laws, why did we create such laws? This is wrong. Were there no such people? The opposition party initially argued against it, but then they said, ” we should create one too.” they created it. The opposition party argued that it violated three constitutional principles, but then they also created one, thinking, “We can’t have nothing.” they secured 100 seats. And then 200 seats. Over 180 seats. They created satellite parties and now have 200 seats. This way, happiness will not come.

“Even if you do one good deed a day, blessings may not come immediately, but misfortune will automatically go far away. Even if you do one bad deed a day, misfortune may not come immediately, but blessings will automatically go far away.” Doing good deeds is like grass growing in a spring garden. Even if you can’t see it growing, your child grows. When do you see your child growing? They were toddling, and now they are college students, but you never saw them grow. They go to school and come back the same size. In the evening, when you’re depressed, you see them. Later, when they become adults, they shrink. You can’t see them growing. But that blessed child is growing steadily. However, if you say, “I’m a lawyer who won’t have children. I can make a living,” that’s unfilial to your family and disloyal to your country. Not having children leads to the nation’s demise. It’s unfilial to your parents. You think you’re so great. “I’m a female lawyer. Why should I meet a man?” This leads to unfilial behavior in the family and disloyalty to the nation. The population will disappear, and the country will cease to exist. This is like the analogy. You don’t see the immediate consequences. If you don’t get married, what happens later? Your parents worry, “My child isn’t getting married.” And then, the family line dies out. But then, the harm comes. Even if you don’t see the immediate harm, it’s like sharpening a knife on a whetstone. The knife gradually becomes dull and eventually disappears. The family is ruined. The family line dies out. What’s the point of being a lawyer, earning money, and then getting sick, unable to use the money, and dying alone? Will that family line continue? The daughter cuts off the father’s line. The son cuts off the father’s line. They think they are so great. Last week, I said that arrogance is the father of ruin. That’s what it is.

these politicians created satellite parties. The very act of creating satellite parties will eventually bring consequences upon them. Who will bring those consequences? Someone like Huh Kyung-young is meticulously observing this and has the list of those individuals. The secretary-general at the time, the one who advocated for it, and the National Assembly members who followed along—I have all their names. how brilliant is Huh Kyung-young’s mind? They will eventually collapse. They will collapse. even now, they should say, “We were wrong about Huh Kyung-young. Please include Huh Kyung-young in the opinion polls.” What bothers me is that all media outlets are doing the same thing. Do you know why Hitler became Hitler? Hitler’s mother worked as a maid. Hitler’s mother worked at a Jewish butcher shop. The Jewish butcher shop owner would constantly rape Hitler’s mother. He also abused her and didn’t pay her on time. Hitler’s mother would always come home crying. Hitler was a child, an art student who wanted to be a painter. But his mother would come home crying after being abused by the butcher. Hitler saw his mother crying alone many times, as she lived only for him. Hitler understood the cause of her tears. Yet, Hitler endured it. As an artist, he must have been kind. If you look at Hitler’s parades and such, they have an artistic quality. He was very artistic.

He drew about 50 paintings and tried to sell them. But at that time, the German economy was controlled by Jews. All the wealthy people in Germany were Jews. he went to a Jewish neighborhood and entered a Jewish home to sell his paintings, as wealthy people were Jews. The Jewish owner’s dog bit Hitler. Hitler kicked the dog. The owner came out, saying Hitler had startled his pregnant dog, and beat Hitler with a stick while the dog was still biting and tearing at his thigh. Hitler was bitten by the dog and beaten by the owner. Hitler harbored a desire for revenge against Jews. He killed 10 million Jews. No, 6 million. He committed atrocities. Even if the harm didn’t immediately affect them, 6 million descendants of those Jews died because the dog owner valued his dog more than a human. “Why did you come here and excite my pregnant dog?” He tore up all of Hitler’s paintings. The dog bit and tore them all. The trauma Hitler experienced as a teenager, in high school, was profound. He vowed to eradicate the Jews, not leaving a single one. his Jewish mother was abused by a Jew. He went to a Jewish home, was bitten by a dog, and became slightly crippled. But they didn’t even treat him or provide legal assistance. They didn’t treat him as a human being. Then, their descendants suffered.

Will the children and descendants of the current media executives not suffer? Are they not afraid of Huh Kyung-young? I can’t understand why some broadcasters include him and others don’t. And some don’t include him at all, as if by agreement. It’s strange. Even if the harm doesn’t immediately affect them, their descendants will suffer every day. what our ancestors said is absolutely true. Are the words of Sakyamuni, Jesus, or Confucius wrong? No, they are not. God-man did not come to criticize such people. I am here to tell you the useful parts of their words and to organize them for you. why did Hitler start the war? To catch the Jews. He started the war to kill the Jews, saying, “I have no ill feelings towards Asians. I will only deal with these Jews.” He only targeted Europe. He killed all the Jews. And when Hitler committed suicide, what did he say? “I have done everything I needed to do. I have avenged my mother against the Jews. I have succeeded. It is done. What more is there for me to do?” we see that the seeds of evil sown by them led to the suffering of their descendants. The current Korean election is like that. They have inflicted immense unfairness upon Huh Kyung-young. They have violated the Constitution. The Korean Constitution has been violated. An election that does not uphold the Constitution will ruin Korea. I came to Earth to witness such things. These forces of evil don’t even know what they are doing. The most important thing that must be fair is an election.

We need to discover talented individuals, but they always want to monopolize everything. If there’s a good lawyer, they want to take all the good cases. They tell weaker lawyers, “You can starve. I’ll take everything.” It’s like that. When large corporations monopolize, people say, “Let’s help the traditional markets.” “Department stores shouldn’t operate on Sundays for the sake of traditional markets.” There were such rules. Even large corporations practice coexistence. But our politicians are monopolizing everything. They are completely destroying minor parties. They prevent new figures from emerging. It’s strange, isn’t it? I clearly came in third. But they don’t even acknowledge the opinion polls themselves. However, the Election Commission states that Huh Kyung-young is third in opinion polls. What has the National Election Commission been doing? Negligence, indifference, dereliction of duty. Why are all broadcasters and media outlets excluding Huh Kyung-young, who is third? They should send an official letter asking them to uphold fairness. But they don’t. Should I send an official letter now? “What should I do?” Should the National Election Commission send an official letter when all media outlets exclude a third-place candidate? Should they abuse their power? Should they rectify it? No. The National Election Commission should reflect on its actions. They should remember Huh Kyung-young’s influence. I don’t even need to be president. But is there such an unfair, unjust, and negligent organization in the 21st century? I like to be humble and treat you like children. I am such a person. I have a lot of love and don’t criticize anyone. But do our public officials have any sense? The National Election Commission is a constitutional body. Even if the National Assembly, the legislative branch, sets the election rules, shouldn’t the National Election Commission intervene when fairness is compromised? Why are the current media outlets excluding Huh Kyung-young, the candidate of the National Revolutionary Party, who is third in the National Election Commission’s opinion polls? The Election Commission says that the election law allows media outlets discretion. But should media outlets have such discretion? At least candidates with over 1% support should be included consistently. Kim Dong Yeon, with 0.3%, is consistently included. But a candidate with 5.7% is excluded. The National Election Commission should issue a corrective order. “Candidates with over 1% support must be included consistently.” They should do this. If the National Election Commission issues such an order, that itself becomes constitutional law. It doesn’t need National Assembly approval. The National Election Commission is a constitutional body, like the Supreme Court. are we unaware of this? Are they just waiting for payday? I see everything. I know all their names. I will reveal them clearly later. They will seek rewards, but I will do something else. It’s a special judgment. When the special judgment comes, Huh Kyung-young will be the judge. It won’t be left to prosecutors. The president is the judge. Such a special judgment will be held before the public. It will be interesting, won’t it? the fact that we are being pushed into a defensive position means that this nation has reached its end. That’s why it’s the end of the world, and the God-man appears. the God-man who will save you. But you don’t recognize it even when you see it. It’s the end of the world, and the God-man appears. This is predetermined. I’m not saying anything now; I’m just letting you know. I am silent. But do you think I don’t know?

4. The Three Stages of Perception: From Prejudice to Right View
   The world’s people are complicit in this illegal election. The world’s people don’t know how pathetic this situation is at the end of the world. How pathetic is this? I’m getting angry, and I’m thirsty. There are two ways to promote a message. One is “hard approach.” If someone appears with five stars on their forehead, people think it’s a stone bed. If it doesn’t match, it’s a hard approach. The image has five stars, but people think of a stone bed. That’s how they live and write. This is a hard approach.

Then there’s “soft approach.” In advertising, this touches people’s emotions. Emotions. What emotions do five stars touch? None. “Give me a Daeil Band-Aid.” There are many bandage brands, but why do people ask for Daeil Band-Aid? No one asks, “Are you from the Daeil Band-Aid company?” They just ask for Daeil. The pharmacist gives them Daeil. This means Daeil Band-Aid was heavily advertised. Did they use a hard approach or a soft approach? A hard approach. They didn’t need to say why Daeil Band-Aid is good. Just “Daeil Band-Aid for wounds.” If they advertised that Daeil Band-Aid has good rubber and stretches well, they would be crazy. They just need to say that Daeil Band-Aid exists. They don’t need to say it’s made with eco-friendly materials from America. That’s unnecessary. It’s all about the brand. It’s about the image. the image is the same, but it’s about the five stars. they don’t need to advertise that stone beds are good for the body or that there are many stone beds in Korea, but Seongdang is the best. That would be crazy. The stone bed company would fail. there’s no need for a soft approach. A hard approach is needed. People need to know who Huh Kyung-young is, but they are preventing a hard approach. If all broadcasts are blocked, Huh Kyung-young has no hard approach image. How can a hard approach image be created? I am the world’s best advertising expert. No advertising expert can compare to Huh Kyung-young. Those with great skill should learn from me, the top professor of advertising. They learned advertising in English. Why learn it? All advertising books are in English, so they learned it all in English.

Huh Kyung-young was born during the Korean War, an orphan, and worked as a servant in a rural home. He studied classical Chinese, completed middle and high school curricula in elementary school, and learned high school English in elementary school, all while working as a servant. He did this under the light of an oil lamp when there was no electricity. At 15, he came to Seoul, worked in about 30 factories, sold his blood for tuition, and studied in a tent in temperatures below -30 degrees Celsius. He developed peritonitis, his stomach swollen like a pregnant woman’s. He survived thanks to a kind Buddhist monk. He went through all that, became the adopted son of Korea’s first chaebol, met high-ranking officials, and eventually became a presidential candidate. He helped tens of thousands of poor people and then became known as a presidential candidate. That’s my life story, a soft approach. I also use a soft approach. But if Huh Kyung-young’s name appears on TV, that becomes a hard approach. since there’s no opportunity for both, I used a soft approach through books. Books have been published. I’m using a soft approach through books, but that’s much slower than TV. Some people make movies out of books for a soft approach. President Lee Myung-bak had a drama about him. “The Legend of a Hero,” right? Lee Myung-bak became president because of that. Park Geun-hye suffered greatly because of it. After “Rustic Period” and other dramas, Park Geun-hye lost the primary election. Lee Myung-bak appeared first. This kind of portrayal of a person’s growth process has a huge impact on the public. Park Geun-hye didn’t have much of a soft approach profile. She was known because her father was president. She gained respect from the public because of her father’s legacy. That’s a soft approach profile. But Lee Myung-bak was different. He grew up in a rural home with nothing, starving through middle and high school, selling bread in the market. He was a self-made man. That’s his soft approach. As it became known, he joined Hyundai and his rags-to-riches story touched people’s emotions. even Park Geun-hye, with her strong hard approach profile, was defeated. Lee Myung-bak became president before Park Geun-hye. Why did a chaebol pick Lee Myung-bak? A drama writer used Lee Myung-bak as a drama subject. the order changed. Lee Myung-bak came first, and then Park Geun-hye was impeached. The cause of that was a writer who touched Lee Myung-bak’s soft approach. Because of that drama, Park Geun-hye became the next president, and Lee Myung-bak’s faction impeached Park Geun-hye. This led to a bloody feud, and the Democratic Party benefited from it. The Democratic Party gained power from the fight between Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye. history shows that a soft approach can have a powerful effect. Lee Myung-bak could not have become president just with his name, a hard approach. His growth process, Lee Myung-bak starving in the market, his mother selling fish in the market, Lee Myung-bak from a poor family, suffering from malnutrition, collapsing on the street, selling honey while in high school. This resonated with the public.

Look at this. What is this? This is the IBM logo. It’s made of broken pieces. This means “digital.” It’s made up of repeating 1s and 0s, forming IBM. It’s digital. But there’s a mistake here. What’s in it? The IBM logo is easy to input into a computer because it’s made of long and short lines, connected by symbols. But what does it represent? Only a hard approach. It doesn’t have a soft approach. Apple cleverly used this. Did they include IBM here? They included IBM here too. But it’s not broken; it’s connected. And the color of the Apple logo is brightest in the middle, and the colors get darker towards the edges. But here, there’s no color. It’s blue. IBM is blue. IBM is like a blue prison uniform. when Apple created its advertisement, a person in a prison uniform walked out. They came out in a line. That’s the IBM logo. They wore blue prison uniforms because the IBM logo is blue. But then, a woman appeared holding an apple. She threw the apple. That’s Apple. What does this mean? This logo is not made of broken pieces; it’s connected, forming an apple. It represents integration. It’s not broken. This computer is recognizable. But the image of an apple, a fruit, is emotional. This is a soft approach image. They used a soft approach. The lines are a hard approach, and the apple is a soft approach. IBM is too rigid, while Apple is integrated with nature. hardware and software are integrated. That’s why Apple succeeded. IBM failed. That’s why a person from IBM left and created this. I discovered this problem and fixed it perfectly. The woman ran and threw the apple. When she threw it, the prisoners collapsed. This means IBM will collapse before Apple. When the apple flew, it exploded like an atomic bomb, and the prisoners disappeared. This means IBM was defeated. Apple ran this advertisement in the past, and it’s considered the best advertisement in the world.

When you promote the presidential election, you need to understand what I’m saying. You need to promote Huh Kyung-young’s name, but you also need to tell his story, his growth process, using a soft approach. A hard approach is a flyer. A soft approach is why we like that person. He suffered so much, but he doesn’t seem tainted by it. He is pure. He will truly make us live well as president. He studied by selling his blood and suffered so much. You need to convey that image, the soft approach image, along with the hard approach. Apple combined both hardware and software. This is too much of a hard approach. Apple, which only used blue, would have failed. IBM failed, and Apple rose. The Apple logo is an apple, but the color is red in the middle, shining brightly. It’s even bitten. But here, there’s no color. Just a single blue color. IBM failed. If we want to win this presidential election, you need to be smart. I need to teach you even this much in my lectures. I have two types of advertising: hard approach and soft approach. Two types of images. You don’t know about images. You need to know that there are approach images. And you need to know about Daeil Band-Aid. You need to know that no one says, “Give me Jomil.” They say, “Give me Mi Won.” Mi Won represents Jomil. when it comes to president, it should just be “Huh Kyung-young.” like five stars, which makes people think of a stone bed, we use a symbol for promotion. when I raise my leg, that image combines both hard and soft approaches. When I raise my leg, it contains two immense images: a hard approach and a soft approach. even without writing Huh Kyung-young’s name on a flyer, if you see the image of a raised leg, people know it’s Huh Kyung-young. ” a kick, a kick. Huh Kyung-young.” But for children, the first approach is through levitation. Levitation, Chukjibeop. That’s a soft approach. I’ve captured all the children with my advertising from a long time ago. you can’t just use one approach. But if you make a machine that kicks, will it work? No. When a person does it, people know that person is Huh Kyung-young. This is where it comes in. This person wearing a hat, his head. It means his mind is full of complex thoughts. This is what you call Apple, but it’s actually a person. He’s wearing a hat, and his head is full of thoughts. There’s a reason why I use the image of a raised leg. But other people just use a simple logo, like the National Revolutionary Party logo. That has no image. Life must be in it. Does Apple have life? Does the National Revolutionary Party’s raised leg have life? Yes, it contains a human. But do the logos of the ruling and opposition parties have people in them? No. They are just drawings. They only have a hard approach image, not a soft approach image. You need to know this. Now, when you give a lecture about Huh Kyung-young, you need to talk about how Huh Kyung-young grew up. How Huh Kyung-young suffered. And that’s why he wants to give us these things. Huh Kyung-young studied through a tearful school life. Many people stole his books. He studied as if he were fighting for independence because people would steal his books. He studied when others slept, but during the day, he worked in factories. He helped guests at temples. He taught Sunday school at churches. He had no time to read books. he would read books in the bathroom. He would study in the bathroom. When the next person would say, “Why isn’t this guy coming out of the bathroom?” he would be studying. He would study in the library. That was sweet to him. But these days, children call me and say, “President Huh Kyung-young, I don’t want to study. What should I do?” The moment I hear that, I think, “No. The country is going to ruin.” ” our lazy teenagers are ruined.” I had no time to study, so I studied secretly, had my books stolen, was beaten by reporters, and was fired from 30 factories. I was so sad. You should listen to Baek Cheon Seonsaeng’s song. Before Baek Cheon Seonsaeng, let’s listen to this person’s song first. Hello, this is Bulleonaem. The presidential election is about 40 days away. Huh Kyung-young is like a white dragon waiting in Heaven. But the mudfish are laughing at him. They are crazy. Huh Kyung-young is crazy. They are saying things like that. This is my current situation before I appear. The mudfish are all avoiding me. The mudfish are saying, “We are the leaders, we are the dragons,” before the white dragon appears. Let’s see what kind of behavior these mudfish are showing these days.

Did anyone imagine Yoon Suk Yeol would become a candidate after becoming prosecutor general? This means Yoon Suk Yeol never dreamed of being president. “We just wanted to come out quickly and live comfortably.” Yoon Suk Yeol is someone who never intended to be president but is now in that position by chance. He should have come out himself. He should have been someone who, 10 or 20 years ago, had a vision, saying, “I will be president and implement such and such policies.” But he just got caught up in the atmosphere and popularity, and when people around him cheered him on, he started acting like he was truly something. Lee Jae Myung, on the other hand, always campaigned with his wife. But Yoon Suk Yeol was never alone. He never campaigned with his wife in this election. Reporters, curious about this, asked, “Lee Jae Myung campaigns with his wife, but why do you campaign alone, Mr. Yoon Suk Yeol?” Yoon Suk Yeol lied, saying, “My wife has no interest in politics whatsoever. She’s only focused on her own work, so there’s no reason for me to ask her to campaign with me, and even if she wanted to, there’s no need.” But if you listen to the recording, what is Kim Kun Hee saying? “If I seize power, I won’t leave alone the YouTubers who criticized us. Don’t help my husband with his schedule or anything. The campaign is a mess, so let’s get some advice.” She’s already doing this. She’s a woman with no interest in politics. This family matter can happen in any family. Siblings might get angry at their mother. these family issues are not that important. You broadcasted this, but I don’t consider such things important. People might say, “Siblings curse each other, mothers and fathers curse their children,” but in the past, family members would curse each other, and we need to understand that. You are broadcasting this, and you might have good intentions, but we need to hear this correctly. Many families curse each other. Some fight with their siblings, or over filial piety towards their parents, or ancestral rites. We don’t need to discuss such things.

Does KBS report on Huh Kyung-young? No, they don’t. Ahn Cheol Soo appears quite often. And Shim Sang Jung also appears, even though she’s at 3%. But in the perception of various media and people, she’s mocked, yet she gets 5.6%. Originally, Ahn Cheol Soo was below Huh Kyung-young two months ago. He was at 3%, below Huh Kyung-young. But while I was in the hospital with COVID-19, Ahn Cheol Soo gained a lot of support. What happened to the Lunar New Year TV debate this time? They excluded Huh Kyung-young again. But for those of you with normal minds, who should be here instead of these two? Huh Kyung-young should be there. Shim Sang Jung’s approval rating is 3%, but Huh Kyung-young’s is 5.6%. as Huh Kyung-young said, it’s a debate of mudfish. This debate is a debate of mudfish. But Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating will continue to rise, so he will eventually have to participate in legally mandated TV debates. What does that mean? If my approval rating exceeds 10%, I will be able to participate in TV debates. If it exceeds 10% and they still don’t include me, we can file an injunction for a legal debate. Your voices are a bit small. There’s no hope above 6%. There’s no hope for the ruling or opposition parties. 299 people are crying and shaving their heads, announcing large-scale rallies. In February, the election will reach its peak, and large-scale rallies are planned. Self-employed people don’t need to do that. If Huh Kyung-young becomes president, self-employed people will receive cash during COVID-19. But how much did the current government give to small business owners? They gave 5 million won each to 550,000 people. But are there only 550,000 self-employed people in Korea? And you fools, 30 years ago, when Huh Kyung-young said he would give money to the people, you all scoffed. But now, what? You don’t ask where the money comes from when they give it. Huh Kyung-young gives money through quantitative easing, and he says he will give 1.5 million won per month, but people don’t understand this. Our national budget was about 300 trillion won 10 years ago. But now, it’s double that, 600 trillion won. The country could run on 300 trillion won, but they are spending 600 trillion won. If we cut that, we can secure about 400 trillion won. 400 trillion won. And we can secure 100 trillion won through a wealth-proportional fine system, and another 100 trillion won from special businesses. And 100 trillion won by integrating taxes, and another 100 trillion won by preventing tax evasion. That makes about 800 trillion won. This is a conservative estimate; we could collect even more. if we give 1.5 million won each to those over 18, I’m not sure of the exact number, but let’s say 35 million people. That would be 52.5 trillion won. Multiply that by 12 months, and it’s 630 trillion won. where does this enormous amount of money come from? Look, 800 trillion won minus 630 trillion won leaves 170 trillion won. 170 trillion won remains. You ignorant fools who criticize Huh Kyung-young, 170 trillion won remains. That money can be used for things like the “Ansim Free Card” (a welfare card) and marriage support. It’s perfectly feasible. And we can use more from the national budget. But now, people ask, “Where’s the money?” A public official embezzled 11.5 billion won this time. He was caught, but how many others are embezzling tens of millions or hundreds of millions without getting caught?

The conclusion is that this TV debate is hosted by three broadcasting companies. They say it’s a four-way debate. As Huh Kyung-young is exposed to the media, more of his unknown aspects will emerge. More unknown aspects will become apparent. Lee Jae Myung will participate in the debate with Yoon Suk Yeol. Yoon Suk Yeol is at about 40%, and Lee Jae Myung is at 38%. Reporters who went to Lee Jae Myung will watch the debate and think, ” Yoon Suk Yeol isn’t it either.” Then, defectors will emerge, looking for other alternatives. But they won’t go to Shim Sang Jung. Shim Sang Jung ran in the last presidential election and participated in debates. Nothing will change. The same goes for Ahn Cheol Soo. people will become frustrated. ” this is crazy.” They can’t stand Lee Jae Myung, and Yoon Suk Yeol seems wrong too. In this situation, self-employed people will enter large-scale rallies in February. February is the peak season for the election. They will mobilize all their efforts, but there will be a break. Will these people care about the presidential election? No. What they will care about is money. In the past, when Huh Kyung-young talked about giving money, people didn’t pay attention. But now, the government is giving 5 million won, and there are people who are angry or haven’t received it. In such a situation, people will naturally turn to money. now, because this debate is hosted by broadcasters, Huh Kyung-young couldn’t participate. But Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating is 5.6%. If it continues to rise, he will appear in legally mandated TV debates. If people who are already thinking this way hear Huh Kyung-young introduce his policies, public opinion will rise dramatically. what will happen? A dragon will ascend among the mudfish.

what you need to know is that I sometimes confuse “message” and “image.” Look, “message” and “image.” I wrote “E” instead of “Image.” It’s “Image,” you know? It’s “Image.” both “Image” and “Message” are included. I wrote it that way because both have “age” at the end and “m” at the beginning, so both “message” and “image” occur simultaneously. you can call it a hard approach message or a hard approach image. I sometimes make mistakes when writing this. a soft approach message. Advertising is a message. It’s about conveying a message. That works well, and that message contains an image. People see Huh Kyung-young’s message and think of his appearance. Now, what will the image be? There will be an image change. In the future, the image will be: “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa (Huh Kyung-young’s faction).” This is the image. This is the soft approach image. This is the hard approach image. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” This will be in all our advertisements. Children will say, “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” This will become a song. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” That’s friendly. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” This will be in every advertisement, even in a single photo. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” “Huh-pa” is like our lungs. Our lungs are here, our heart is here. Left-wing and right-wing have no heart. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” It’s funny. But we can also say “Dae-pa” (large green onion) instead of “Huh-pa.” What’s smaller than Dae-pa? “Jjok-pa” (small green onion). Besides “buchu” (chives), what other types of green onions are there? “Jjok-pa,” “yang-pa” (onion), no answer. “Jjok-pa” is Korean, and “yang-pa” is Western. “Jjok-pa, yang-pa, no answer. Dae-pa.” Dae-pa is the green onion. “Jjok-pa, yang-pa, no answer. Huh-pa.” That’s good. We can do that. “Jjok-pa, yang-pa, no answer. Huh-pa.” This will be our future hard approach message, soft approach message, hard approach image, and soft approach image. I often used “E” for “image,” but that was wrong. I mixed them up. You need to understand this. when writing “image,” the “i” should be lowercase. I sometimes use uppercase by mistake. The “i” should be lowercase. why am I giving you advertising education? Because advertising is like this: “Jjok-pa, yang-pa, no answer. Huh-pa.” “Jjok-pa” is left-wing, “yang-pa” is right-wing. Westerners say that right-wing comes from that side. “Jjok-pa, yang-pa, no answer. Huh-pa.” “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer. Huh-pa.” We will continuously incorporate such images into our advertisements. We have already created them. They are very interesting. I will show you the video next time.

5. The Peril of a Divided Nation and the Vision of the God-man
   An election that does not uphold the Constitution will ruin the nation. If the ruling and opposition parties clash, what happens? The ruling party, the Democratic Party, has 200 seats. Will the government change? Only the president changes, and the country falls into chaos. The elected president from the People Power Party will demand the resignation of the former Democratic Party president. The 100 Democratic Party members will immediately impeach the president. They will find various pretexts. there will be a chaotic political situation, and North Korea might see an opportunity. They might invade. In such a situation, should a powerful nation become the UN Secretary-General? No. The five permanent members of the UN Security Council—the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China, and Russia—dominate the world. These five powerful nations control the world. a powerful nation should not be the UN Secretary-General. They let smaller countries like Korea become UN Secretary-General. That was a good decision by the UN. Why? If China became UN Secretary-General, it could become an imperialist power. If the United States continuously held the position, it could lead to imperialism. to stabilize our country, who should emerge? A powerful person or a weaker person? Someone like Huh Kyung-young, who has no National Assembly members, can mediate between the ruling and opposition parties and prevent them from fighting. This is how we can save the people. You can see the reason. a powerful person should not emerge. Should Japan be allowed to be UN Secretary-General? No. Because it’s an ambitious country. if Huh Kyung-young becomes president, the People Power Party and the Democratic Party will not fight. I will mediate between the 200 National Assembly members and the 100 National Assembly members, and you can just receive what you are given. 100 million won does not require the consent of the ruling and opposition parties; the president can give it out unilaterally within two months. However, 1.5 million won per month requires the consent of the National Assembly. we can bring in the presidential candidates from the ruling and opposition parties as vice presidents. There’s no such law, but we can change the law. We can form a coalition government with vice presidents and seek the consent of the National Assembly members. But what if the National Assembly members don’t cooperate? What if they don’t cooperate? Then the people will say, “We want to receive money quickly. Send those politicians away.” Then, I will boldly declare a state of emergency to save the economy, saying, “Please stay put for a while.” And then, I will pass the law. You don’t need to worry. Even if I don’t say anything, the presidential election will unfold like a drama. Kang Yong Seok and Kim Tae Ma are not allowed. when the broadcasting company said they would do it, I said, “This will definitely work. Just go.” If the candidates’ YouTube channels broadcast it, that’s fine. Candidates debating among themselves is fine. But the moment a broadcasting company gets involved, fairness is required, so it’s not allowed. the problem is that Shim Sang Jung, with 6 or 7 seats in the National Assembly, automatically participates in debates if she has more than 3 seats. Shim Sang Jung is confirmed as a debate participant even though her approval rating is less than 3%. Huh Kyung-young, on the other hand, needs an average approval rating of over 5% for one month, from January 16th to February 14th or 15th, to participate in the three legally mandated debates. But Huh Kyung-young’s approval rating is consistently over 5.6%. I think it would be good if Huh Kyung-young appears because Lee Jae Myung’s main policy is to distribute money through taxes, but Huh Kyung-young offers the ultimate version of distributing money through taxes. Giving 5 million won or 2 million won is nothing. As soon as Huh Kyung-young is elected, he will give 100 million won to everyone over 18, and 1.5 million won per month. How can anyone compete with that? There’s no way to compete with 50 million won for marriage. There’s no way to compete with money. No matter how much they promise to give money, they can’t compete with such overwhelming populism. He doesn’t call it populism; he says it’s feasible. He says he will make people free from financial worries. That’s it. Don’t women want to hear their husbands say, “I’ll make sure you never have to worry about money”? Not “I’ll kill you with my bare hands,” but “I’ll make sure you never have to worry about money.” They would marry even a black man. If someone told me they would marry me and make sure I never had to worry about money, I would follow them immediately. If you get married, you realize that life is all about worrying about money. But if someone says they will make sure you never have to worry about money, what can you say? Huh Kyung-young says he will give 100 million won. four people over 18 in a family would get 400 million won. Even if it causes national bankruptcy, he doesn’t care. He says he will give it. If Lee Jae Myung causes bankruptcy, it’s bankruptcy. If Huh Kyung-young causes bankruptcy, it’s bankruptcy. It’s the same. Bankruptcy is bankruptcy. Kim’s side says, “No more two-way debates, except for those broadcast by the media.” It’s interesting. He speaks quite favorably of Huh Kyung-young. He already knows about the 400 million won. And he already knows that 6 million people will return. if 400 million won is revealed, 6 million people will return. Kang Yong Seok seems to have fallen. He will try.

COVID-19 cases are now over 15,000, even 20,000. Almost everyone who gets tested has COVID-19. But after COVID-19, COVID-19 didn’t come back. But now there are many variants, so you need to get a third and fourth vaccination. we must all get vaccinated for the third and fourth time. However, those who are weak, children, and pregnant women need to be careful. They can choose not to get vaccinated. But if you don’t get vaccinated and then get sick, it’s dangerous. But if you’re blessed, you’ll be fine, but those who get vaccinated and blessed recover faster and have better effects. you should get vaccinated if possible. Except for pregnant women and children, everyone should get vaccinated.

Let’s listen to Baek Cheon Seonsaeng’s song. Huh Kyung-young, God-man Huh Kyung-young. If you revere Huh Kyung-young, Heaven will show signs that a great blessing will descend. God-man Huh Kyung-young, God-man Huh Kyung-young, please save Korea. Otherwise, a great disaster will descend. God-man Huh Kyung-young, the great leader of God-man, the people are still not realizing it. God-man Huh Kyung-young, if you revere him, a great disaster will descend, as shown by Heaven. God-man Huh Kyung-young, only God-man Huh Kyung-young can shake Korea in this critical situation. God-man Huh Kyung-young, I will upload his videos. God-man Huh Kyung-young, thank you. Please spread this to the whole world. This shows signs that a great disaster will descend. Thank you. God-man Huh Kyung-young. This person is Baek Cheon Seonsaeng, the president of the American shamans. He is working hard, and Heaven is telling him to do this. Baek Cheon Seonsaeng does many good things, so when you see him, be careful. There is something called “Jeonggyeon” (正見, right view). There is also “Jeonggwan” (正觀, right observation). And there is “Jeongsi” (正視, right seeing). If you have Jeonggyeon, you can see everything correctly. Jeonggwan. These are all characters for “seeing.” But in Chinese characters, their meanings are all different. Jeonggyeon and Jeonggwan are different. When you go sightseeing, you use the character “gwan.” You use “gwan” for sightseeing. “Gyeon” is different from “gwan.” People who go sightseeing just say, ” the scenery is nice.” That’s what we call “seeing.” That’s “gwan.” “Gyeon” is seeing through the inner world. “Gyeon” is not just seeing the image of the inner world; you have to see the message too. it’s not just a hard approach; it’s a soft approach too. That’s what “gyeon” means. When we look at advertisements, we need to see them this way. When you look at Huh Kyung-young’s face, you can see it with Jeonggyeon and Jeonggwan. ” he’s handsome.” “He’s a bit older than me.” That’s “gwan.” But who is Huh Kyung-young? He was born during the Korean War and worked as a servant. That’s Jeonggyeon. This is stronger than that. This initially attracts people with image-making. At first, you look at something because it’s interesting. But if I looked like Hitler, Jeonggyeon wouldn’t work well. Jeonggwan would be bad. Jeonggwan brings people in first. Jeonggwan brings them in, and then there’s Jeonggyeon. Then there’s Jeongsi. This is the second. This is the third. if you have Jeonggyeon, the two extremes are already seen as one. The two extremes are seen. This is seeing one extreme. Jeonggyeon sees both extremes. Jeonggyeon sees both extremes. This is not just seeing both extremes; it’s seeing the whole. In Jeonggyeon. this is just seeing the image. This is seeing both extremes. Seeing both sides of the coin. You’ve already seen both sides. But what is Jeonggyeon? After seeing both extremes, the middle way is completed. ” this is a person.” the middle way, left and right, all become one, leading to a complete conclusion. That’s what we call Jeonggyeon. in Buddhism, there are the Eightfold Path, and if you have Jeonggyeon, the other seven are already completed. Jeonggyeon, Jeongmyeong (right livelihood), Jeong-eo (right speech), Jeongnyeom (right mindfulness). These eight paths, six of which are right thoughts. Jeonggyeon, right thoughts, six of them. There are eight, and Jeonggyeon is at the forefront. It’s the locomotive of the train. This Jeonggyeon pulls along Jeongsa (right action), Jeongjeong (right concentration), Jeongnyeom, Jeong-eo. It pulls everything along. if there is justice, if there is Jeonggyeon, you know Jeong-eo. If there is Jeonggyeon, it’s useless. if you have only Jeonggyeon, the Eightfold Path is considered completed. what humans need to complete before they die is Jeonggyeon. Who has Jeonggyeon? What do the current media outlets have? What the media outlets have, which only see both extremes, is prejudice. Prejudice. It’s not Jeonggyeon; it’s prejudice. ” what does that person know?” They don’t know anything about Huh Kyung-young. It means they haven’t watched my YouTube videos. These people have prejudice. ” he’s not from Seoul National University.” “He’s not from a broadcasting school.” Such prejudice. ” he doesn’t have National Assembly members.” This is not seeing both extremes; it’s seeing one extreme. This “yanggyeon” (two views) cannot compare to “junggyeon” (middle view). What is the middle way? It’s “junggyeon.” The middle way falls under “junggyeon.” even if you see both extremes, “What is this coin made of?” That’s another problem. You’ve only seen the patterns on the front and back of the coin, which is Jeonggwan. But “What material is this coin made of? How many degrees was it melted at? What is its weight? What is the complexity of its creation?” That’s “junggyeon.” there are Jeonggyeon, Jeonggwan, Jeongsi, Junggyeon, Yanggyeon, and Pyeongyeon (prejudice), but Jeonggyeon is the final stage. when you look at the various things that appear, when you look at Baek Cheon Seonsaeng’s work, you shouldn’t think, ” that’s shamanism, isn’t he crazy?” Yoon Suk Yeol’s wife likes shamanism. It’s freedom of religion. When you look at it, you shouldn’t have prejudice, thinking, ” those who believe in it are good, those who don’t are bad.” You shouldn’t do that. What about our grandmothers? They probably practiced shamanism. Our great-grandmothers probably went to shamans. Is that possible? Is it in our ancestors’ subconscious ? It is. Even if Christianity is outside, deep in the subconscious, we are descendants of people who practiced shamanism. You shouldn’t look at such things with prejudice. You shouldn’t look at it with “yanggyeon” (two views). You shouldn’t look at only one side. Even if you see both sides, it’s not enough. You have to go to “junggyeon.” And then, eventually, you have to go to “jeonggyeon.” it’s difficult to see and understand things correctly. how you package and present Huh Kyung-young’s image to the public involves two things. Soft approach and hard approach. It must be able to convey both image and message. You convey Huh Kyung-young’s image, and Huh Kyung-young’s message is different. “I will pay off the people’s debts of 100 million won.” I want to create a society where even students who are not good at studying can be filial to their parents. Young people who are not good at studying and don’t have jobs should be able to marry freely and have grandchildren. That’s Huh Kyung-young’s policy. If they fail exams, they fail. Or they are not naturally good at studying. But they want to be filial, but when they go for job interviews, they fail. “What university did you graduate from?” they keep failing. They want to get married quickly and become independent to show something to their parents, but they can’t even give them grandchildren, and women run away when they see them. these failing students, those who are behind, those who are mentally struggling, should be able to live, marry, and be filial to their parents. That’s what I want to create. This is a world where only successful people live. The world I want is one where even if you’re not good at studying, even if your grades are bad, a woman will say, “If we get married, we’ll get 300 million won.” Then, people won’t say, “You’re incompetent, I’ll starve even if I’m a National Assembly member.” people who want to be filial to their parents but can’t, who can’t get married and are stuck in their rooms, feeling sorry when they see their parents’ faces—they are living in hell. There are many such young people. This is a disharmony between ideals and reality. They want to help their parents, who are constantly fighting over money, by earning money, but then they get into cryptocurrency or gambling. Then they incur more debt. they are seen as unfilial children, but deep down, they want to save their parents. But no matter how many times they try, it doesn’t work, and it only brings more trouble to the family. More debt, more seizures on their home. their mothers are heartbroken. those young people commit suicide. Those who commit suicide are all filial children. But this cold reality mercilessly crushes those who are not good at studying or are behind others. I will give 100 million won and 1.5 million won per month. Then, a couple will get 300 million won for marriage, and 1 million won per month for 10 years for raising children. This situation will allow any child to be filial. And fathers will get 4.1 million won, 2.2 million won, and 1.5 million won, plus 700,000 won for elderly benefits. And fathers will have money left over. Parents will have money left over and tell their children, “You can use some.” If we don’t create such a society, we will be unfilial to our ancestors and elders, and we will be disloyal to the nation by not having children and not getting married. we are unfilial and disloyal. Who wants to do this? No one wants to. Everyone wants to be filial to their parents, but they give 4.4 million won per month to parents who won’t live long. A father living alone gets 2.2 million won. If a son gets married, he and his wife get 3 million won. His mother gets 2.2 million won. That family can live. The mother raises the grandchildren. But if a 52-year-old son is unmarried, unemployed, and has no income. His mother also has no income. We have created such a country, and now we are being crushed by the struggles of smart people. Ordinary people are being crushed. Everyone wants to be filial, but they are all being unfilial. To the elderly. They are turning the elderly into vegetative states. They are trapped in nursing homes, constantly worried about their sons and daughters-in-law. But if the elderly receive 2.2 million or 4.4 million won, they won’t have to worry about their daughters-in-law. “You can use some of this.” If they give it to their daughters-in-law, the relationship will improve, and since the daughter-in-law and son get 3 million won, they will say, “Mother, father, it’s okay. Just keep it and use it.” This is how our filial country is producing unfilial children. This election, which does not uphold the Constitution, will ruin the nation. Risk your lives. You know how scary Pa Bu Chim Ju is. Risk your lives and make sure we get 5% or 10% this time. Yes, on March 9th, we will definitely win. Please give a round of applause for victory. Thank you.

20220129_Sat_Lecture1320_ElectionIntegrity_The Presidential Election That Disregards the Constitution Will Ruin the Nation

Date: 2022.01.29

Keywords: Election Integrity, Constitutional Violation, Media Bias, Campaign Strategy, National Crisis

Content

The Unjust Presidential Election and Constitutional Violations
For two months, the media and political parties have colluded to exclude Huh Kyung young, a candidate with 5.7% approval, from opinion polls. Had he been included, his current support would exceed 20%, and it already surpasses 5.6%. The decision to exclude Huh Kyung young, who was initially third in the polls, and include only the fourth and fifth-place candidates in the four-way debate, constitutes a clear violation of the Constitution and a blatant act of human rights suppression. We are committed to fighting against this infringement of fairness and equality, which are fundamental principles of election law. We strongly urge the media and broadcasters to immediately include Huh Kyung young in opinion polls and TV debates. As justice inevitably prevails, failure to comply will incur the wrath of the public and the heavens. We are honored to welcome Huh Kyung young, who strives to create a fair and prosperous world free from financial worries, and we will listen attentively to his invaluable words of hope and vision.

A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will inevitably lead to the nation’s ruin. While we often speak of unfairness and inequality, the current situation has become excessive. Initially, I was in third place, followed by Ahn Cheol-soo in fourth, and Sim Sang-jung in fifth. However, due to my exclusion from television coverage, I fell to fourth place. Despite this, they continue to insist on debates only between the third and fourth-place candidates. The public is gradually realizing the profound unfairness of this presidential election. Therefore, we must exert our utmost effort to expose this injustice to the world and overturn the presidential election results.

The Spirit of Xiang Yu and the Battle of Jingxing
Consider the historical figure Xiang Yu, the Hegemon-King of Western Chu. During his five years of warfare, he fought 70 battles and emerged victorious in every single one. It was only in the 71st battle that he suffered defeat, leading him to commit suicide on the battlefield. He drew his sword and disemboweled himself in front of his entire army. Xiang Yu was renowned for his immense strength and martial prowess. Even as a king who governed the nation for five years, he personally led his troops into battle. His defeat in the 71st battle, after 70 consecutive victories, was a profound blow. His voice was so powerful that merely drawing his sword and shouting would cause enemy horses to flee in terror, and soldiers to collapse. He was a truly formidable general.

However, a single mistake in the 71st battle led to his defeat. His pride was so wounded that he chose to commit suicide before his troops. This exemplifies a man who would not tolerate defeat in battle. Such an individual possesses an extraordinary spirit. This indomitable spirit, akin to Xiang Yu’s, is precisely what we need as we approach the presidential election. There is no retreat; there is no turning back from the battlefield. We are destined to achieve victory in any circumstance. How could the Creator ever face defeat? While there may be temporary setbacks, the path always leads to victory.

Xiang Yu’s strategy in warfare always involved a specific objective. This is related to the concept of “breaking the cauldrons and sinking the boats” (破釜沉舟, pàofǔ chénzhōu). When Xiang Yu’s army went to war, they would destroy their cooking cauldrons and sink their boats after crossing a river. This was the spirit of pàofǔ chénzhōu. In Korean, this strategy is known as baesujin (背水陣), meaning “to set up a formation with one’s back to a river”. Xiang Yu’s approach to baesujin was to destroy the means of retreat and sustenance. This meant that soldiers were to fight with the understanding that there was no returning alive; they were to fight to the death. By destroying the boats after crossing the river, there was no way back. By smashing the cooking cauldrons, the soldiers were told, “If we fail to capture this fortress, we will starve to death. Be prepared.”. Soldiers carried their own cauldrons for cooking, and these were all broken. The boats were sunk in the river, signifying that retreat was impossible. This is the essence of baesujin: fighting with one’s back to the water, but not merely facing the water; it is doing so with the pàofǔ chénzhōu spirit. The idea that one could escape if boats were available was unacceptable; thus, all boats were burned or sunk. The destruction of all cauldrons and boats conveyed the message: “If we fail to conquer that fortress, we will perish from hunger.”. This strategy compelled the soldiers to fight for survival. Our supporters possess this same spirit.

Our supporters are rapidly increasing in number. They are soldiers unlike any seen before or any that will be seen again. Have you ever seen soldiers distributing flyers at 2 or 3 AM? No. Those who work part-time are only concerned with their hourly wage. They might distribute flyers for three hours and then leave them on the street. Our soldiers, however, are like a Heaven army, bringing with them countless angels. There are archangels in infinite numbers, as well as ordinary angels. While some may be less attractive, they are still angels. Men do not need archangels; they receive ordinary angels. Archangels are typically reserved for women, perhaps with certain conditions. This reflects human nature, though divine beings operate differently. Humans tend to give good things to women, and women to men. This spiritual resolve is what we call imjeonmutoe (臨戰無退), the Hwarang spirit: there is no retreat in battle.

The Baekje General’s Loyalty and Self-Sacrifice
While there is no retreat, consider the Baekje general who fought without retreating, leading to the death of all 5,000 of his men. It is better to die fighting. There is no general in the world like that Baekje general. Even though the Baekje king was indulging in pleasure and misgoverning, the Baekje general fulfilled his duty to the nation. A general like Yi Seong-gye would have returned and dethroned King Uija. But why did the Baekje general not depose King Uija, despite his incompetence? History records him as an unworthy king, yet the general, knowing he would die, took 1,000 men and, before leaving, beheaded his own wife and children, signifying that he would not return. The soldiers were stunned by this act. He gathered his subordinates, executed his family in front of them, and did not inform the king of the danger. This spirit must reside within the members of our National Revolutionary Party. His army of 5,000 fought against 100,000 enemy soldiers, and not a single one survived. Such a spirit, embodied by the Baekje general, is unparalleled in world history. He was an extraordinary individual. Generals are different. We must remember such people. They fulfill their duties as generals, regardless of whether the king governed well or poorly, without criticizing or attempting to usurp the throne. He could have easily overthrown the king, but he did not. This is truly remarkable. The crucial point is that he sacrificed his wife and children. Imagine the mindset of the soldiers who followed him into battle. They were already dead men; survival was impossible. Yet, they went to die for King Uija. It is admirable.

This contrasts sharply with the current political climate, where politicians are engaged in nongonghaengsang (論功行賞), the practice of distributing rewards and positions based on merit. They are dividing up positions among themselves. The ruling and opposition parties are using every means to exclude Huh Kyung young. If a candidate is among the top three, their name should be included in opinion polls. The names of media executives who failed to include my name in their polls are already on my list of 3,000 targets. They still do not realize that Huh Kyung young is a spiritual being. They believe they can laugh after the presidential election. But I have already secured that list. Do they think I will do nothing while sitting here? I will do my best until the election ends. Just wait and see. I am not an ordinary person, so while they scramble for nongonghaengsang, I will not remain idle. If they were truly principled, they would include Huh Kyung young, regardless of external pressure. Why is the third-place candidate’s name omitted?.

They mock my statements about “levitation” and “縮地法 (chukjibeop, teleportation)”. These are exercises for children, practices our ancestors engaged in. Why is it wrong to encourage children to emulate these practices?. Why is the third-place candidate, Huh Kyung young, excluded from opinion polls, while someone like Kim Dong-yeon, who polls at 0.X%, is included?. They argue that Kim Dong-yeon was a Deputy Prime Minister and might merge with the Democratic Party, so he must be included. Regardless of political alliances, if Huh Kyung young is third, he must be included. Otherwise, someone will lose their job. There should be at least one person in the media who stands up and says, “Huh Kyung young is doing this, so how can I do that?”. Was there anyone in MBC, KBS, SBS, or the cable channels who insisted on including Huh Kyung young in opinion polls when I was polling at 5.7% and in third place?. I achieved third place even without being included. Because they continue to exclude me, the public operates on the “law of observation”. If something is not seen, it is not perceived.

The Power of Unconscious Influence in Advertising and Politics
When you go to buy a bandage, do you ask for “a bandage” or “Daeil Bandage”?. The power of repeated exposure is immense. Because certain brands are constantly advertised, people unconsciously ask for them. This is what they are aiming for. The human unconscious mind dominates the conscious and subconscious minds. If something repeatedly enters the unconscious, people will unconsciously ask for it. This is simple repetition. Yet, despite this, my name is not allowed on flyers or in online campaigns. Who is conducting such an illegal election?. What is the National Election Commission doing?. When I filed an injunction, the judiciary was already compromised. If the judiciary had a sense of justice, they would have recognized Huh Kyung young’s emergence. They would have questioned why broadcasters and newspapers were ignoring him. The public is now growing suspicious.

They fear Huh Kyung young. Any candidate from the ruling or opposition party who appears with Huh Kyung young will be exposed for plagiarizing his policies. When the original appears, all the copycats fail. They are afraid. A judge should intervene and say, “You must include him.”. These people are out of their minds, wasting precious seconds and minutes. They haven’t heard the public’s opinion. I am the Creator, so I am fine. But my supporters are seething with anger. Their bodies are suffering, their stomachs are churning, and they cannot eat. Is this the Republic of Korea?. The electoral system is destroying democracy. They have violated the five fundamental rights of the people. Do they think I cannot participate in debates because I don’t have five National Assembly members?. Why is it necessary to have five members?. The Democratic Party is responsible for this. They created satellite parties for proportional representation. This violated the Constitution, causing an uproar from the opposing party. Yet, the People Power Party also created its own satellite party, taking all the proportional representation seats that should have gone to minor parties. This drove Sim Sang-jung to despair. She now has more than 10 National Assembly members. But her party was ruined; her parliamentary seats decreased. Our votes are not counted because they created satellite parties to prevent minor parties from gaining seats.

This system of proportional representation and satellite parties is unprecedented in world history. The current ruling party created it. The public tolerates this, and the National Election Commission even encourages the creation of satellite parties. Despite the opposition party clearly stating that this violates the Constitution, the Election Commission sided with the ruling party and allowed the creation of satellite parties. Why did I invest so much to field 253 candidates, believing that minor parties would be given seats?. Was my money not money?. The Democratic Party initially broke its promise. Their promise was to not create satellite parties, which we minor parties could not even dream of. We fielded candidates for the sake of minor parties, incurring enormous costs. But then, they created satellite parties, taking away the National Assembly seats that should have gone to us. They then merged these National Assembly members back into their original parties. This is unprecedented in world history. We prepared to fill 300 National Assembly seats with principled individuals. They secured 180 seats through such means. They have secured 1,200 National Assembly members through illegal means. Such opportunistic gains will eventually become their downfall.

When Emperor Donghak Seongje was dying, what was his final instruction?. He said, “Even a single good deed may not bring immediate blessings, but misfortunes will automatically recede.”. Conversely, “Even a single evil deed may not bring immediate misfortune, but blessings will automatically recede.”. I will show them this later. Huh Kyung young will not always remain as he is now. Then, they will experience the receding of blessings and the arrival of misfortune. They created satellite parties, thinking, “Am I the only one responsible? All our Democratic Party members agreed to this.”. They shift blame to others. They claim they opposed it, but they merely closed their eyes. This is dereliction of duty. As National Assembly members, they are supposed to create laws. Why did we create such laws?. There was no one who opposed it. The opposition party initially argued against it, but then decided to create their own satellite parties. They argued that it violated three constitutional principles, but then they too created satellite parties, securing 100 seats. They now have over 180 to 200 seats through satellite parties. This method will not bring happiness.

The Consequences of Actions: Good Deeds, Evil Deeds, and the Future
The principle is: “Even a single good deed may not bring immediate blessings, but misfortunes will automatically recede. Even a single evil deed may not bring immediate misfortune, but blessings will automatically recede.”. Good deeds are like grass growing in a spring garden. You may not see it growing, just as you don’t see your child growing day by day. One day, your child, who once toddled, is a university student, but you never saw them grow. Their clothes seem to fit, but then they become too short. You don’t see the growth, but they are growing steadily. However, if a lawyer says, “I won’t have children; I can earn a living,” this is filial impiety at home and disloyalty to the nation. Not having children leads to the nation’s demise. It is disrespectful to parents. If a female lawyer says, “I’m successful; why should I marry a man?” this leads to filial impiety at home and disloyalty to the nation, resulting in population extinction and the disappearance of the country.

Such actions may not show immediate negative consequences. If you don’t marry, what happens later? Parents worry. Eventually, the family line ends. This brings harm. Good deeds are like grass growing in a spring garden; you don’t see it growing, but it increases day by day. Conversely, evil deeds are like sharpening a knife on a stone; the knife gradually dulls and eventually disappears. The family will be ruined. If the family line ends, what is the point of wealth?. A successful lawyer who earns a lot of money but then falls ill and dies without being able to spend it, leaves no descendants. The daughter or son cuts off the family line. Pride is the precursor to ruin. The creation of satellite parties by politicians will eventually bring consequences upon them. Who will bring these consequences? Huh Kyung young, who meticulously observes and possesses the list of those involved. He has the names of the secretary-general, the proponents, and the National Assembly members who followed along. Huh Kyung young’s intellect is so sharp that they will eventually collapse. Therefore, they should now admit their mistake and include Huh Kyung young in opinion polls.

The Story of Hitler and the Consequences of Prejudice
What bothers me is that all media outlets are uniformly excluding me. Why did Hitler become Hitler?. Hitler’s mother worked as a maid. She was employed at a Jewish butcher shop. The Jewish butcher repeatedly raped Hitler’s mother. He also abused her and withheld her wages. Hitler’s mother would often come home crying. Hitler, a young art student, witnessed his mother’s suffering. He understood the cause of her tears. Yet, Hitler endured, as he aspired to be an artist and was inherently kind. His parades and artistic endeavors showed his exceptional artistic talent. He painted about 50 pictures and tried to sell them. However, the German economy was controlled by Jews at the time; all the wealthy people in Germany were Jewish. he went to a Jewish neighborhood to sell his paintings. When he entered a Jewish home, the owner’s dog bit him. Hitler, in response, kicked the dog. The owner, angered that Hitler had startled his pregnant dog, came out and beat Hitler with a stick while the dog was still biting his thigh. Hitler was bitten by the dog and beaten by the owner. This fueled his desire for revenge against Jews. He killed 6 million Jews.

Though the Jews did not suffer immediate harm, the actions of that dog owner led to the deaths of 6 million of their descendants. The owner valued his pregnant dog more than a human. He tore up Hitler’s paintings, which were already damaged from the dog’s bites and the owner’s beating. The trauma Hitler experienced as a teenager led him to believe that not a single Jew should be left alive. His mother had suffered at the hands of a Jew, and he himself was bitten by a Jewish man’s dog, leaving him with a slight limp. Yet, they did not treat him as a human being. Their descendants suffered the consequences. Do the current media executives and their children not fear Huh Kyung young?. I cannot comprehend their actions. Some broadcasters include me, others don’t, and some even conspire to exclude me. This is the principle of “even a single evil deed may not bring immediate misfortune, but blessings will automatically recede,” meaning their descendants will suffer daily. Our ancestors’ words are never wrong. The words of Sakyamuni, Jesus, or Confucius are always true. Divine beings do not criticize such individuals; they merely organize and convey their valuable teachings.

Ultimately, why did Hitler start the war? To eliminate the Jews. He declared that he had no ill will towards Asians, only towards the Jews. He targeted only them, killing them all. When Hitler committed suicide, he declared that he had fulfilled his mission. He had avenged his mother and eliminated the Jews. He felt he had nothing more to do. Thus, the seeds of their evil deeds sprouted within their descendants. The current Korean election is similar. They have inflicted immense injustice upon Huh Kyung young. They have violated the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. I have come to Earth to witness these things. These evil forces are unaware of what they are doing. The election should be the most fair process. It should be about discovering talent, but instead, the same people always monopolize everything. If there is a successful lawyer, they take all the good cases. They tell weaker lawyers to starve. This is like large corporations monopolizing the market, while traditional markets struggle. Large corporations engage in coexistence. But our politicians are monopolizing everything. They are destroying minor parties. They prevent new figures from emerging.

It is strange, isn’t it? I clearly came in third. Yet, they don’t even acknowledge the opinion polls. However, the National Election Commission itself states that Huh Kyung young is third in opinion polls. What has the National Election Commission done? Negligence, dereliction of duty. Why are all broadcasters and media outlets excluding the third-place candidate, Huh Kyung young?. They should send an official letter demanding fairness. But they don’t. Should I send an official letter?. Should the National Election Commission send an official letter to all media outlets that are excluding the third-place candidate?. They should rectify the situation. The National Election Commission should reflect on its actions. They should remember Huh Kyung young’s capabilities. Even if I don’t become president, is there such an unfair, unjust, and negligent organization in the 21st century?. I prefer to be humble and childlike. I am a person full of love, who does not seek to defeat anyone. But do our public officials have any sense?. The National Election Commission is a constitutional body. Even if the National Assembly, the legislative branch, sets the election rules, shouldn’t the National Election Commission intervene when fairness is compromised?. Why are the current media outlets excluding Huh Kyung young, the candidate of the National Revolutionary Party, who is third in opinion polls according to the National Election Commission?. They claim that election law allows media outlets discretion. But should media outlets have such discretion?. They consistently include candidates polling above 1%, like Kim Dong-yeon at 0.3%. But they exclude a candidate polling at 5.7%. The National Election Commission should issue a corrective order. They should mandate that candidates polling above 1% be consistently included. A directive from the National Election Commission itself is constitutional; it does not require National Assembly approval. The National Election Commission is a constitutional body, like the Supreme Court. Do they not know this? Are they just waiting for payday?. I see everything. I know all their names. I will reveal them clearly later. While they engage in nongonghaengsang, I will do something else. There will be a special judgment. When that special judgment occurs, Huh Kyung young will be the judge. It will not be left to prosecutors. The president is the judge. Such a special judgment will be held before the public. It will be interesting, won’t it?.

The Prophecy of the End Times and the Role of Huh Kyung young
The fact that our nation is being pushed into a corner signifies the arrival of the end times. In these end times, a sacred emperor will appear. An emperor who will save you all. But you do not recognize him even when you see him. The prophecy of the sacred emperor in the end times is already predetermined. I am not speaking now, but merely informing you. I am silent. But do I not know?. The world’s people are complicit in this illegal election. The world’s people do not know, which is a lamentable situation in these end times.

There are two ways to convey a message. One is the “hard approach”. For example, if someone appears with five stars on their forehead, you might think of a stone bed. This is a hard approach. The image is directly conveyed. The other is the “soft approach”. This involves touching people’s emotions through advertising. Five stars do not evoke emotion. When you ask for a Daeil Bandage, even though there are many bandage brands, you ask for Daeil because it has been heavily advertised. This is a hard approach. You don’t need to explain why Daeil Bandage is good. Just show it on a wound. Advertising its material or flexibility is unnecessary. It’s all about the brand. The image. the image is the same, but it’s about the five stars. You don’t need to explain how good a stone bed is or its health benefits. Saying that a particular stone bed is the best among many is foolish. That company will fail. The soft approach is not needed; the hard approach is. People need to know who Huh Kyung young is, but they are preventing the hard approach. If all broadcasts are blocked, Huh Kyung young has no hard approach image. This is frustrating. I am the world’s best expert in advertising. No advertising expert can surpass Huh Kyung young. Even top advertising professors should learn from me. They learned advertising in English, and I learned it all in English.

The Power of Soft Approach: Huh Kyung young’s Life Story and Apple’s Marketing
The soft approach for Huh Kyung young involves his life story: born during the Korean War, an orphan, working as a servant in a rural home, studying Chinese classics, completing middle and high school in elementary school, and mastering high school English in elementary school while working as a servant, often by the light of a kerosene lamp. At 15, he came to Seoul, worked in 30 factories, sold his blood for tuition, and studied in a tent in sub-zero temperatures, developing peritonitis. He survived thanks to a kind nurse. After such hardships, he was adopted by Korea’s first chaebol family, met influential people, and became a presidential candidate. He helped tens of thousands of poor people. This is my life’s soft approach. If Huh Kyung young’s name appears on TV, that becomes the hard approach. Since there is no opportunity for both, I have used books for the soft approach. Books are less effective than TV. Some even make movies or dramas from books for the soft approach. Lee Myung-bak’s drama, “The Legend of the Hero,” helped him become president. Park Geun-hye suffered greatly from this. His growth story had a huge impact on the public. Park Geun-hye had little soft approach. She was known because her father was president, and she inherited his prestige. This was a hard approach. Lee Myung-bak was the opposite. He grew up in a poor rural home, struggling through middle and high school, selling bread in the market. He was a self-made man. This was his soft approach. His story of joining Hyundai and his rise to success touched people’s emotions. even Park Geun-hye, with her strong hard approach, was defeated. Lee Myung-bak became president before Park Geun-hye. A drama writer used Lee Myung-bak’s story as material. This changed the order of events. Lee Myung-bak’s presidency led to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment. The Democratic Party benefited from this conflict between Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye. History shows that the soft approach plays a powerful role. Lee Myung-bak could not have become president with only the hard approach of his name. His growth story, his struggles in the market, his mother selling goods, his poor family, his malnutrition, collapsing on the street while selling honey. This resonated with the public.

Consider the IBM logo. It is made of fragmented letters, representing digital technology. This is a hard approach. It lacks a soft approach. Apple cleverly exploited this. They included the IBM letters in their logo, but they were connected, not fragmented. The colors also changed, with the center being the brightest. IBM’s logo was blue, like a prisoner’s uniform. Apple’s advertisement showed people in blue prisoner uniforms, representing IBM, walking in a line. Then, a woman appeared with an apple and threw it. This was Apple. The Apple logo, with its connected, not fragmented, design, represented integration. It combined the hard approach of a computer with the soft, emotional image of a fruit. The lines were the hard approach, and the apple was the soft approach. IBM was rigid, while Apple was integrated with nature. This combination of hardware and software led to Apple’s success, while IBM failed. A person from IBM created Apple, recognizing this problem. The woman throwing the apple caused the prisoners to collapse, symbolizing IBM’s downfall. The apple exploding like an atomic bomb made the prisoners disappear, signifying IBM’s defeat. This advertisement was considered the best in the world.

When promoting Huh Kyung young in the presidential election, you must understand this. You need to convey his growth story, his hardships, and his purity. This combination of hard and soft approaches, like Apple’s, is crucial. IBM, with its rigid blue logo, eventually failed, and Apple rose. Apple’s logo, though an apple, has vibrant colors, with the center glowing red. IBM, with its single blue color, failed. To win the presidential election, you need to be intelligent. I am teaching you about these two types of advertising: hard approach and soft approach, two types of images. You need to understand that there are images. You also need to understand the power of brand recognition, like Daeil Bandage or Miwon. Just as people say “Miwon” instead of “seasoning,” they should say “Huh Kyung young” when thinking of president. Like the five stars representing a stone bed, we need a symbol for our campaign. My image of lifting my leg combines both hard and soft approaches. Even without my name, people recognize it as Huh Kyung young’s. For children, the soft approach of levitation and chukjibeop was introduced first. I captured the attention of children through advertising long ago.

The image of a person wearing a hat, with a complex mind, represents humanity. The Apple logo, though an apple, represents a person. My image of lifting my leg has a reason. Other parties’ logos, like a simple crescent moon, lack life. Apple has life. My party’s logo, with the leg lift, has life because it represents a human. But the logos of the ruling and opposition parties are just pictures, mere hard approach images, lacking the soft approach. You need to understand this. When I give lectures, I explain Huh Kyung young’s growth story, his hardships, and his intention to give back to the people. He studied amidst tears and blood, often having his books stolen, studying like an independence fighter. He worked in factories during the day, helped guests at temples, and taught Sunday school at churches, leaving him no time to read. He would read in the restroom. That was a sweet pleasure. But today’s youth call me, saying they don’t want to study. This signifies the nation’s decline. Our lazy youth are a problem. I had no time to study, so I studied secretly, had my books stolen, was beaten, and was fired from 30 factories. The sorrow was immense.

The Current Political Landscape and the Need for Change
The presidential election is 40-some days away. The current situation is like minnows mocking a white dragon. The minnows are the current politicians. The prophecy speaks of a white dragon waiting in the sky, while minnows mock it. The minnows are avoiding me. They are proclaiming themselves as leaders before the white dragon appears. Let’s see what these minnows are doing. Did anyone imagine Yoon Suk-yeol would become a candidate after being a prosecutor general?. This implies he never dreamed of being president. He just wanted to live comfortably. He is now in that position by chance. A president should be someone who has envisioned policies for 10 or 20 years, not someone who gets caught up in the moment and popularity. Lee Jae-myung has always campaigned with his wife. Yoon Suk-yeol, however, has always been alone. When reporters asked why, he lied, saying his wife had no interest in politics and was focused on her own work. However, a leaked recording reveals Kim Keon-hee saying she would not tolerate YouTubers who criticized them if she gained power. She also advised her husband on campaign matters. This contradicts her claim of having no interest in politics.

Family issues can exist in any household. Arguments between siblings or with parents are common. These family matters are not that important. While some may broadcast such issues with good intentions, we must interpret them correctly. Many families argue over filial piety or ancestral rites. We should not dwell on such matters. Does KBS report on Huh Kyung young? No. Ahn Cheol-soo gets some coverage, and Sim Sang-jung, despite polling at 3%, also appears. Huh Kyung young, however, is polling at 5.6%. Ahn Cheol-soo was below Huh Kyung young two months ago. While I was in the hospital with COVID-19, Ahn Cheol-soo’s support rose. What happened in the Lunar New Year TV debate? Huh Kyung young was excluded again. For those with a normal mindset, who should have been there instead of the two current participants? Huh Kyung young, with 5.6% support, not 3%. This debate is a “minnows’ debate”. Huh Kyung young’s approval rating will continue to rise, so he will eventually participate in legally mandated TV debates. To participate in TV debates, my approval rating needs to exceed 10%. If it exceeds 10% and they still exclude me, we can file an injunction for legal debates.

There is no hope for the current ruling and opposition parties. There will be large-scale rallies and protests in February. Self-employed individuals do not need to protest. If Huh Kyung young becomes president, self-employed people will receive cash payments for COVID-19 relief. The current government gave 5 million won to 550,000 small business owners. But are there only 550,000 self-employed people in Korea?. Thirty years ago, when Huh Kyung young said he would give money to the people, everyone scoffed. But now, they don’t question where the money comes from. Huh Kyung young’s plan involves quantitative easing and monthly payments of 1.5 million won. People don’t understand this. Ten years ago, Korea’s national budget was around 300 trillion won. Now, it’s 600 trillion won. The country could operate on 300 trillion won, so by reducing the current budget, we can secure about 400 trillion won. Another 100 trillion won can be raised through a wealth-proportional fine system, and another 100 trillion won from special businesses. Consolidating taxes will raise another 100 trillion won, and preventing tax evasion will raise another 100 trillion won. This totals approximately 800 trillion won. This is a conservative estimate; more could be collected. If 1.5 million won is given monthly to 35 million people over 18, it would cost about 52.5 trillion won per month, or 630 trillion won annually. where does this enormous amount of money come from?. If you subtract 630 trillion from 800 trillion, 170 trillion won remains. This is enough to cover other benefits like free care cards and marriage support. We can also use more from the national budget.

What about those who question where the money comes from?. A public official recently embezzled 11.5 billion won. This person was caught, but how many others are embezzling millions or billions without being caught?. The conclusion is that the upcoming TV debates are hosted by three broadcasting companies. There will be a four-way debate. The more Yoon Suk-yeol is exposed to the media, the more his shortcomings will become apparent. Lee Jae-myung will also participate in the debates. Currently, Yoon Suk-yeol is at 40% and Lee Jae-myung at 38%. After watching the debates, some of Lee Jae-myung’s supporters might realize Yoon Suk-yeol is not the answer and look for other alternatives. But Sim Sang-jung and Ahn Cheol-soo, who have participated in previous debates, offer nothing new. People will become frustrated. They won’t want to see Lee Jae-myung or Yoon Suk-yeol. Meanwhile, self-employed people will enter large-scale protests in February, which is the peak season for elections. They won’t be focused on the presidential election; they will be focused on money. In the past, people ignored Huh Kyung young’s talk of giving money, but now the government is giving 5 million won, and many are angry because they didn’t receive it. In such a situation, people will inevitably turn to money.

Currently, Huh Kyung young cannot participate in the debates because they are invitation-only. But his approval rating is 5.6% and rising. If it continues to rise, he will be legally mandated to appear in TV debates. If people who are already thinking in this direction hear about Huh Kyung young’s policies, public opinion will surge. Then, a dragon will ascend from among the minnows. You need to understand this. I sometimes confuse “message” and “image”. Advertising is both a message and an image. Both have the same image. The message becomes the image. Both “message” and “image” have “age” at the end and “me” at the beginning, so they generate simultaneously. you can call it a hard approach message or a hard approach image. I sometimes make mistakes when writing this. there’s a soft approach message. Advertising is a message. It conveys a message. That message contains an image. When people receive Huh Kyung young’s message, they see his image. The image will change. The new image will be: “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing” (허파, heopa). This is the hard approach image. It also contains the soft approach image. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. This will be in all our future advertisements. Children will sing, “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. This will create familiarity. This phrase will be in all our advertisements. “Huh-wing” refers to our lungs (허파, heopa), our heart. The left-wing and right-wing have no heart. “Left-wing, right-wing, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. We can also use “daepa” (대파, green onion) instead of “heopa”. “Jjokpa” (쪽파, scallion) and “yangpa” (양파, onion) have no answer; it’s “daepa”. “Jjokpa” represents Koreans, and “yangpa” represents Westerners. “Jjokpa, Yangpa, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. This will be our hard approach message and soft approach image. I sometimes mistakenly use “e” instead of “i” for “image”. You need to understand this. The “i” in “image” should be lowercase. I am teaching you about advertising because it is important. “Jjokpa, Yangpa, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. “Jjokpa” is the left-wing, “yangpa” is the right-wing. Westerners are often associated with the right-wing. “Jjokpa, Yangpa, no answer; it’s the Huh-wing”. We will incorporate these images into our advertisements. We have already created them and will show them next week.

The Path to National Stability and Prosperity
A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. If the ruling and opposition parties clash, with the Democratic Party having 200 seats, the government will not change; only the president will, and the nation will fall into chaos. The newly elected president from the People Power Party will be impeached by the 200 Democratic Party members. There will be various pretexts. This chaotic political situation could invite an invasion from North Korea. In such a scenario, should a powerful nation like the US, UK, France, China, or Russia become the UN Secretary-General? No. These five hegemonic nations control the world. Hegemonic nations should not be UN Secretary-General. Smaller countries like Korea are chosen for that role. This is good for the UN. If China or the US were to continuously hold the position, it could lead to imperialism. To stabilize our country, who should emerge? A powerful person or a weaker one?. Someone like Huh Kyung young, who has no National Assembly members, can mediate between the ruling and opposition parties. This is how the people can be saved. A powerful person should not emerge. Japan should not be UN Secretary-General because it is an ambitious nation. If Huh Kyung young becomes president, the People Power Party and the Democratic Party will not fight. I will mediate between the 200 and 100 National Assembly members, and you will receive your benefits. The 100 million won payment does not require parliamentary approval; the president can decide. However, the 1.5 million won monthly payment requires parliamentary approval. We can appoint candidates from the ruling and opposition parties as vice presidents. This is not against the law; we can change the law. By forming a coalition government with vice presidents, we can gain the consent of the National Assembly members. But what if the National Assembly members don’t cooperate?. The people want to receive money quickly. They will demand the removal of those politicians. Then, I can boldly declare a state of emergency to save the economy, asking them to step aside temporarily, and pass the laws. You have nothing to worry about.

Even if I don’t speak, the presidential election will unfold as predicted. Kang Yong-seok’s prediction is incorrect. Broadcasters cannot host debates between candidates. Debates between candidates themselves are fine. But if broadcasters are involved, fairness is required, so it’s not allowed. Sim Sang-jung, with 6 or 7 parliamentary seats, is automatically included in debates if she has more than 3 seats. even though her approval rating is below 3%, she is confirmed for the debates. Huh Kyung young, however, needs an average approval rating of over 5% for a month (January 16 to February 14-15) to participate in the three legally mandated debates. Currently, Huh Kyung young’s approval rating is 5.6%. I believe it would be good if Huh Kyung young participates. Lee Jae-myung’s main policy is to distribute money through taxes, but Huh Kyung young offers the ultimate solution. Giving 5 million or 2 million won is no match. As soon as Huh Kyung young is elected, he will give 100 million won to everyone over 18, and 1.5 million won monthly. No one can compete with this. 50 million won for marriage. No one can match such overwhelming populism. He doesn’t call it populism; he calls it a feasible plan. He promises to eliminate financial worries. This is what women want to hear most from their husbands: “I’ll make sure you never have to worry about money.”. They would marry even a black chicken. If someone promised me a life free from financial worries, I would follow them immediately. Marriage often involves lifelong financial worries. Huh Kyung young promises 100 million won. Four people over 18 in a family would receive 400 million won. The government doesn’t care about such things.

Whether it’s Lee Jae-myung or Huh Kyung young, the financial implications are the same. A trillion won in debt or ten trillion won in debt, it’s all the same. A quadrillion won in debt is also the same. the debt is inevitable. Kang Yong-seok speaks favorably of Huh Kyung young. He already knows about the 400 million won and the 6 million people who will return. he knows that if 400 million won is revealed, 6 million people will return. Kang Yong-seok seems to have fallen.

COVID-19 cases are now exceeding 15,000 to 20,000. Most people who get tested are positive. After COVID-19, there were no new variants. But now there are many variants, so third and fourth vaccinations are necessary. We must all get vaccinated. However, those who are weak, children, and pregnant women should be careful and may choose not to vaccinate. Not vaccinating and then getting sick is dangerous. While blessings can help, vaccination combined with blessings is more effective. everyone except pregnant women and children should get vaccinated.

The Importance of Right View (正見)
Let’s listen to Baekcheon Seonsa’s song. “Huh Kyung-young, Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young. If you neglect Huh Kyung young, heaven will send down great calamities as a sign.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, please save the Republic of Korea. Otherwise, great calamities will descend.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, the people are unaware of the imminent disaster.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, to understand this, one needs a high level of Heaven insight. Heaven is hinting at great calamities.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, only Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young can save the Republic of Korea from this critical situation. Heaven is showing this as a great sign.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, I upload videos about him daily.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young, thank you. Please spread this worldwide. Heaven is showing signs of great calamities.”. “Heaven Divine Huh Kyung young.”. This person is Baekcheon Seonsa, the president of the American fortune-tellers’ association. He is working diligently, and heaven is telling him to do a 1,000-day prayer. Baekcheon Seonsa does many good deeds. When you see such things, you must be careful.

There is jeonggyeon (正見, right view), jeonggwan (正觀, right observation), and jeongsi (正視, right seeing). Jeonggyeon means being able to see everything correctly. These Chinese characters all mean “to see,” but their meanings are different. Jeonggyeon and jeonggwan are different. When you go sightseeing (gwan), you use the character gwan. Gwan is different from gyeon. When people go sightseeing, they just say, ” the scenery is nice.” This is gwan. ” boats can pass there, the lake is beautiful.” This is gwan. Gyeon means to see through the inner world. It’s not just about seeing the image; it’s about seeing the message. it’s not just the hard approach; it includes the soft approach. This is how we should view advertising. When you look at Huh Kyung young’s face, you can see it with jeonggyeon or jeonggwan. If you just think, “He’s handsome,” or “He’s a bit older than me,” that’s gwan. But if you see Huh Kyung young as someone born during the Korean War, who worked as a servant, that’s jeonggyeon. Jeonggyeon is stronger than jeonggwan. Jeonggwan initially attracts people with image-making. If I looked like Hitler, jeonggyeon would be difficult; jeonggwan would be negative. jeonggwan draws people in first, then jeonggyeon follows. Then there is jeongsi. This is the second, and jeonggyeon is the third.

When you achieve jeonggyeon, you see both sides as one. Gyeon sees both sides. Jeonggyeon sees not only both sides but the whole. Gwan only sees the image. Gyeon sees both sides of a coin. Jeonggyeon is the completion of the middle path after seeing both sides. It is the perfect conclusion where left and right become one. This is jeonggyeon. In Buddhism, there are eightfold paths, and if you have jeonggyeon, the other seven are already complete. Jeonggyeon is the locomotive that pulls the other seven paths. Without jeonggyeon, you don’t know jeongeor (right speech). Without jeonggyeon, jeongjeongjin (right effort) is useless. if you have jeonggyeon alone, all eight paths are considered complete. Therefore, jeonggyeon is what humans must complete before they die. But who possesses jeonggyeon?. What do media outlets have? Prejudice, not jeonggyeon. They don’t know anything about Huh Kyung young. They haven’t watched my YouTube videos. They have prejudices like, “He didn’t go to Seoul National University,” or “He’s a former broadcaster,” or “He doesn’t have National Assembly members”. These are not both sides; they are prejudices. Even seeing both sides (yanggyeon) cannot compare to junggyeon (middle view). Jungdo (middle path) is part of junggyeon. Even if you see both sides, understanding what the coin is made of is another matter. You only see the front and back of the coin, which is jeonggwan. But what is the coin made of? How much does it weigh? What is its complexity?. This is junggyeon. among jeonggyeon, jeonggwan, jeongsi, junggyeon, yanggyeon, and pyeongyeon (prejudice), jeonggyeon is the ultimate.

When you look at Baekcheon Seonsa’s videos, you shouldn’t dismiss him as a shaman or a madman. Yoon Suk-yeol’s wife is said to like shamanism. Freedom of religion. You shouldn’t view it with prejudice. When believers see it, they might say it’s good or bad, but that’s wrong. Our grandmothers and great-grandmothers likely practiced shamanism. It is embedded in our ancestors’ unconscious. While outwardly Christian, deep in the unconscious, we are descendants of those who practiced shamanism. You shouldn’t view such things with prejudice. You shouldn’t just see one side or both sides. You need to go to junggyeon, and eventually to jeonggyeon. understanding things correctly is difficult. You need to know how to package and convey Huh Kyung young’s image to the public. This involves both soft and hard approaches. You must convey both his image and his message. Huh Kyung young’s message is different: he will pay off the people’s debts. He wants to create a society where students who don’t do well in school can still be filial to their parents. Young people who struggle in school and are unemployed should be able to marry and have children. This is Huh Kyung young’s policy. They fail exams, or they are not naturally good at studying. They want to be filial, but they fail job interviews. They want to marry quickly, become independent, and show their parents something, but they can’t even have children, and women avoid them. Huh Kyung young wants to create a society where these struggling individuals can live, marry, and be filial to their parents. Is this not what we need?.

Currently, only the successful thrive. The world I envision is one where even those who don’t study well or have poor grades can marry, knowing they will receive 300 million won. There will be no one who says, “You’re incompetent, so I’ll starve even if I become a National Assembly member.”. Young people who want to be filial but can’t, who can’t marry and hide in their rooms, feeling sorry for their parents, are living in hell. There are many such young people. This is a disharmony between ideals and reality. They want to earn money to help their parents, who are constantly fighting over money, but they end up gambling or investing in cryptocurrency, incurring more debt. This brings more trouble to the family, with debts and foreclosures. Their mothers are heartbroken. these young people commit suicide. Those who commit suicide are often filial children. But this harsh reality crushes those who are not as academically inclined or fall behind others. That’s why I promise 100 million won and 1.5 million won monthly. A couple would receive 300 million won for marriage, and 1 million won monthly for 10 years for raising a child. This creates a situation where any child can be filial. A father would receive 2.2 million won, and an elderly parent 700,000 won. Parents would have money left over and tell their children to use it. If we don’t create such a society, we will be unfilial to our ancestors and disloyal to the nation by not having children. No one wants to be unfilial or disloyal. Everyone wants to be filial to their parents, but they can’t. Parents who don’t have much time left will receive 4.4 million won monthly. A single father will receive 2.2 million won. A son and his wife will receive 3 million won. A mother will receive 2.2 million won. The family will be able to live. The mother will raise the grandchildren. But now, people in their 50s are unmarried, unemployed, and have no income. Their mothers also have no income. In such a country, the common people are suffering because of the struggles of intelligent people. Everyone wants to be filial, but they are all being unfilial. The elderly are being turned into vegetative states. Confined in nursing homes, they are constantly worried about their children and daughters-in-law. But if the elderly receive 2.2 million or 4.4 million won, they won’t have to worry about their daughters-in-law. They can tell them to use the money. This will improve relations with daughters-in-law, and since the son and daughter-in-law receive 3 million won, they will tell their parents to keep the money. This is why our filial nation is producing unfilial children.

A presidential election that disregards the Constitution will ruin the nation. You understand the power of pàofǔ chénzhōu. Risk your lives to ensure 5% or 10% support this time. We will surely win on March 9th. Let’s all give a round of applause for victory. Thank you for your trust.