2016.02.06 1012 힐러리의 국수주의와 샌더스의 급진주의와 안철수의 사대주의와 김무성의 보수주의와 문재인의 분파주의와 중산주의의 진리(The Truth of Nationalism, radicalism, Sadaejuui, conservatism, Factionalism, and Huh Kyung Young’s Centrist Ideology)

힐러리의 국수주의, 샌더스의 급진주의, 안철수의 사대주의, 김무성의 보수주의, 문재인의 분파주의를 비판하고, 중산주의가 나아가야 할 방향임.

1. 미국 대선 주자 분석

힐러리 클린턴:
정책: 국수주의 정책으로 미국을 지키려 함.
관상: 공작상으로, 당돌하고 진실성이 강하지만 대중은 당돌함을 싫어함.
문제점: 당돌함이 대중에게 마이너스로 작용.
버니 샌더스:
정책: 급진주의로 월가 해체, 대형 은행 폐지 등 제시(提示).
문제점:
급진주의 정책은 미국의 돈을 홍콩으로 이동시켜 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 만들 수 있음.
미국 달러 가치 하락으로 경제 붕괴 초래 가능.
미국의 현실에 맞지 않는 정책.
관상: 목이 긴 독수리상으로, 진정성과 참신성이 강해 젊은 층에게 인기.
사주: 평행 사주로, 한 직업을 오래 유지하는 특징.

2. 한국 정치인 비판

안철수:
정책: 샌더스를 닮았다. 사대주의적 발상 표출.
문제점:
국회의원 100명 축소 등 정책을 모방.
분파주의로 야당을 불리하게 만듦.
1% 상류층이 서민을 대변하는 것은 모순.
관상: 염소상으로, 직업을 바꿀수록 인기가 하락하는 전업 사주.
김무성:
정책: 출산율을 높이기 위해 조선족 유입 언급(言及), 중산층 투표 불참 유도.
문제점: 돈이 없어 결혼 못 하는 현실을 외면한 안일한 정책.
관상: 이무기상.
문재인:
정책: 노인 수당 70% 확대 지급 언급(言及) (20만원).
문제점:
20만원은 노인에게 실질적인 도움이 되지 않으며, 국민을 기만하는 행위.
국회의원 월급 반납 등 기득권 포기 없이 정책을 내세움.
관상: 소상으로, 직업을 자주 바꾸는 전업 사주가 괜찮음.

3. 중산주의

특징:
월가 해체, 대형 은행 폐지 등 급진적 정책을 언급(言及)하지 않음.
부자가 존경받는 사회를 만들고, 없는 사람에게 제대로 분배하는 정책.
25년 전부터 노인 수당 70만원 지급 언급(言及).
직불 카드 의무 사용으로 세금 탈루 방지 및 국가 예산 확보 (연 100조원).
무국경, 무차별, 무정파를 지향하며 전 세계를 통일하는 진리.
미국의 민주주의와 자본주의는 100살 노인과 같아 폐기 처분하고 중산주의가 세계를 이끌어야 함.
강연자의 관상: 예언서에 나오는 ‘신언서판’을 갖춘 자.
얼굴 잘생기고, 말 잘하고, 글 잘 쓰고, 판단력이 뛰어남.
30년 전부터 제시한 공약들이 여야에 의해 모방됨.

4. 운명과 마음의 중요성

2016년까지의 과거는 바꿀 수 없지만, 오늘 이후의 운명은 마음먹기에 달림.
강의를 통해 깨달은 마음이 운명을 바꿀 수 있음.
마음속에 그를 넣어야 운명을 바꿀 수 있음.
현재 대한민국은 1% 상류층이 99%의 돈을 소유하는 미국과 같은 형태로 가고 있음.
정치인들이 국민의 재산을 빼앗고 중산층을 붕괴시킴.

5. 통합의 시대와 정치인의 역할

21세기는 융합, 통합, 화합의 시대.
통합: 연합, 집합, 결합.
융합: 혼합, 용해, 발효.
화합: 양보, 소통.
주먹을 쥐고 싸우겠다는 정치인의 태도는 시대에 맞지 않음.
진정한 싸움의 대상은 자기 자신.
자신의 공약과 싸우며, 한 번도 공약을 바꾸지 않음.

국수주의: 자국의 이익과 전통을 최우선으로 하는 사상.
급진주의: 사회 변화를 빠르고 근본적으로 추구하는 사상.
사대주의: 강대국을 섬기고 의지하는 사상.
보수주의: 전통과 기존 질서를 유지하려는 사상.
분파주의: 특정 집단이나 당파의 이익을 우선시하는 사상.
중산주의: 설(說)하는 정치 이념으로, 부자와 서민의 조화를 추구하며, 무국경, 무차별, 무정파를 지향.
간접 선거: 유권자가 선거인단을 뽑고, 선거인단이 최종적으로 대표를 선출하는 방식 (미국).
직접 선거: 유권자가 직접 대표를 선출하는 방식 (한국).
전업 사주: 직업을 자주 바꾸는 것이 운명에 좋은 사주 (예: 신영균).
평행 사주: 한 직업을 오래 유지하는 것이 운명에 좋은 사주 (예: 샌더스).
신언서판: 인물을 평가하는 네 가지 기준 (외모, 언변, 문장력, 판단력).

미국 대선 예측: 힐러리와 샌더스의 관상과 사주를 분석하여 샌더스가 대통령이 될 가능성이 높다고 예측.
한국 정치인의 관상:
안철수: 염소상
김무성: 이무기상
문재인: 소상
유승민: 쥐상 (고양이상)
박원순: 염소상
그릇과 운명: 사용하는 그릇의 모양이 사람의 운명에 영향을 미침.
유경수 여사가 총구 모양 접시를 사용하다 돌아간 사례 언급.
이빨 나간 그릇이나 뾰족한 무늬의 그릇은 사용하지 않는 것이 좋음.
미국과 한국의 관계: 미국은 한국을 지배하는 형국이며, 미국의 대선 결과가 한국 경제에 큰 영향을 미침.
미국의 경제 지배: 미국은 로열티와 지식 산업을 통해 전 세계 경제를 장악하고 있음.

The Truth of Nationalism, Radicalism, and Centrism in Global Politics

I speak today not only of the presidential candidates of our nation but also of the potential contenders in the American presidential race, and I will illuminate the inherent flaws in the policies of global politicians. As we enter the Byeongsin year, I will elaborate on the state of world affairs.

Hillary Clinton’s policies are generally rooted in Nationalism (국수주의). The United States, as a nation, must uphold its traditional legitimacy. Conversely, Bernie Sanders, who seeks to steer America toward a more radical path than even China, presents a significant problem. While his rising popularity might suggest otherwise, Sanders’ Radicalism (급진주의) pulls the Democratic Party further left than its traditional progressive wing, potentially making America more left-leaning than China itself.

If policies like Sanders’ were implemented, such as dismantling Wall Street and abolishing large banks, American capital would flee to places like Hong Kong, allowing China to dominate the global economy. This would effectively dismantle the American financial system, turning the U.S. into a communist state while China becomes a democracy. Such actions would signify America’s abandonment of its global leadership.

The American presidential election system, as you know, is an indirect one. In contrast, Korea employs direct elections, which means our democracy is, in fact, about a century ahead of America’s. The U.S. still uses a system akin to the electoral college system once employed by President Park Chung-hee. Out of 300 million Americans, 538 electors are chosen. To win the presidency, a candidate needs 270 electoral votes. In a past election, both President Bush and his opponent received 269 votes each, despite the opponent having millions more popular votes. This illustrates that even if Sanders garners double the popular votes of Hillary, his support among the 300 million citizens does not guarantee a majority of electoral votes. The electors, largely composed of conservative forces, including American capitalists, financiers, and military industrialists, are strategically positioned to protect the nation. This indirect election system was established to prevent a Black president from taking office, ensuring that the electors were predominantly white. While Barack Obama, with his white mother, was an exception, the system is designed to prevent Black individuals from becoming president, as the electoral college is entirely white.

Thus, even with immense popularity, a candidate like Sanders cannot become president in America, unlike in Korea where a popular figure like Huh Kyung-young could. His proposal to dismantle Wall Street would cause all American capital to flee to Hong Kong in pursuit of profit, leaving America a mere paper tiger. This would devalue the U.S. dollar, leading to economic collapse. Such a radical approach, intended to help the common people, would undermine Hillary’s Nationalism (국수주의) and the very foundation of the United States.

It is therefore a form of Subservience to Great Powers (사대주의) for a Korean politician like Ahn Cheol-soo to claim he resembles Sanders, who advocates for policies that would devalue the dollar and relinquish America’s global leadership. My policies, however, do not involve dismantling Wall Street or abolishing large banks. I aim to create a society where the wealthy are respected, and wealth is properly distributed to those in need, rather than simply seizing assets from the rich. Sanders’ proposal for a “rich tax” is problematic because the wealthy already pay substantial taxes; the issue lies in politicians reducing those taxes. If taxes were collected properly without reductions, there would be no need for such measures.

I find it astonishing how some Koreans blindly follow such ideas. For instance, when I proposed reducing the number of National Assembly members to 100, Ahn Cheol-soo echoed this idea. I have been in politics for 30 years, having spoken about this 25 years ago, while he is relatively new to the political scene and merely imitates others.

Ahn Cheol-soo’s Factionalism (분파주의) is also evident. A party leader should unite, not divide. His actions have created factions, putting the opposition party at a significant disadvantage. Can you truly trust such individuals, driven by Factionalism (분파주의) or Subservience to Great Powers (사대주의), to reform politics? I believe not. Ahn Cheol-soo, a member of the top 1% elite, raising his fist in protest is meaningless when it should be the laborers and common people doing so. It is absurd for someone with over 200 billion won in assets to claim to represent the people who struggle to pay rent and utility bills. Our citizens are not so easily deceived.

Kim Moo-sung, the leader of the Saenuri Party, represents Conservatism (보수주의). His suggestion to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to boost the birth rate due to declining population is a flawed policy. While I do not criticize individuals, I must critique their policies. Both Ahn Cheol-soo and Kim Moo-sung appear to be good people, but their policies merely imitate mine. If they are to follow my birthrate policies, they should propose giving 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage. The only policy they haven’t dared to imitate yet is my proposal of 100 million won for marriage, which will cause a national uproar when I become president. They continue to imitate my policies, but they do so inadequately.

Moon Jae-in, on the other hand, is a proponent of Imitationism (표방주의). When I proposed elderly allowances, he suggested giving 200,000 won to 70% of the elderly, expanding on President Park Geun-hye’s current 200,000 won to 20% of the elderly. Is 200,000 won truly helpful? This is merely toying with the elderly. They should return their National Assembly salaries and relinquish their privileges to provide proper support. I have advocated for 700,000 won for the elderly for 20 to 25 years. What is 200,000 won? While they secretly raise their own salaries in the National Assembly, they deceive the public with insufficient aid. If they intend to provide real help, they should do so meaningfully, otherwise, they are merely seeking votes. After elections, they reduce the benefits to 20% and cut the amount. When I become president, I will not act this way.

To increase the budget by 100 trillion won for elderly allowances, I would implement a mandatory debit card system, similar to the U.S., where all transactions are recorded. This would bring in an additional 100 trillion won in taxes annually, which is currently being evaded. Even after providing 700,000 won to the elderly, 200 trillion won would remain, even after covering national expenses. This reveals the extent of the theft occurring. How can a bus company president earn 40 to 50 million won annually? They do nothing; their subordinates handle everything. We know what they are doing. Stop deceiving the public.

Hillary Clinton, Ahn Cheol-soo, Moon Jae-in, and Kim Moo-sung are all Imitators (따라쟁이). They merely imitate my policies, and poorly at that. They are all Imitators (따라쟁이) because they follow my lead.

Hillary Clinton, in terms of animalistic characteristics, is a Peacock (공작상). She is overly bold and assertive, which is a negative trait. Her confident demeanor, which I call Audacity (당돌성), detracts from her appeal. Women should possess some shyness, but she is too brazen. Her strength lies in her perceived honesty and truthfulness, which is both a strength and a weakness. This Audacity (당돌성) and Truthfulness (진실성) cause her to lose ground to Sanders among the public, who prefer a softer demeanor.

Sanders, on the other hand, is a Long-necked Eagle (목이 긴 독수리상), like a vulture that preys on carcasses. The eagle is a symbol of America, aligning with Sanders’ image. His strength lies in his Sincerity (진정성). When he speaks, people believe he will follow through on his promises. Similarly, when I present my policies, people are captivated, believing I will undoubtedly execute them. Sanders also possesses Sincerity (진정성). Additionally, he has Novelty (참신성). Despite his age of over 75, he appears fresh and new, which attracts younger people. The American presidential election is a battle between Hillary’s Audacity (당돌성) and Truthfulness (진실성) versus Sanders’ Novelty (참신성) and Sincerity (진정성).

I will now compare these individuals to my Centrism (중산주의). America is not the Soviet Union, but Sanders seeks to transform it into one. While Sanders is an eloquent speaker, his policies are not entirely suited to American reality, which will pose problems in the future.

Kim Moo-sung’s proposals, such as bringing in ethnic Koreans from China to increase the population and suggesting that the Saenuri Party’s victory depends on discouraging middle-class voting, are overly complacent. It is not a good idea to bring in ethnic Koreans to boost the birth rate when our own people cannot afford to marry due to lack of money.

Now, regarding Ahn Cheol-soo, he was born with a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주). Shin Young-kyun also had a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주). Sanders, however, has a Parallel Destiny (평행 사주), meaning he has consistently pursued a political career for 30 years, from city councilor to presidential candidate. Ahn Cheol-soo, in contrast, constantly changes professions: from doctor to CEO, then professor, and now politician. While some with a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주) ascend with each change, others decline. Ahn Cheol-soo’s popularity has steadily decreased with each career change. Sanders, on the other hand, moved from one party to independent status, then joined the Democratic Party, while Ahn Cheol-soo left the Democratic Party. They are opposites.

Shin Young-kyun, despite having a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주), ascended with each change. He was a successful Seoul National University dentist, then became a popular actor, earning significant wealth. If he had remained a dentist, he would have suffered. Similarly, a woman who constantly goes out would suffer if confined to home. Shin Young-kyun then ventured into business, earning even more, and subsequently became a politician, a National Assembly member, and a broadcaster, even acquiring SBS. He continued to rise with each career change. Thus, some with a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주) ascend, while others descend. We can discern this immediately, though the general public cannot. If such a person were president, the nation’s fortune would decline. Has our nation ever elected a leader who elevated its fortune? Only President Park Chung-hee, through the May 16th Revolution. Other presidents have merely enriched themselves and their cronies, leaving the nation in debt. This cycle of debt and depletion continues.

Unlike Sanders, who dedicates his life to politics regardless of financial gain, our National Assembly members often switch from professions like lawyers, prosecutors, or even taxi drivers. There are even cases of individuals who praised Kim Il-sung in Pyongyang becoming National Assembly members in our Democratic Party. Our National Assembly members are elected in strange ways. Wake up before divine punishment strikes. I am watching everything. What power do I possess? With cosmic energy, I can eliminate anyone on any given day. I can heal, but I can also eliminate. Later, any nation’s president who disobeys me will quietly disappear. I alone possess such energy, but for now, there is no need. I will remain silent until I become president.

Therefore, while a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주) like Shin Young-kyun’s can be beneficial, Ahn Cheol-soo’s presents various problems. Why does he constantly create factions? Moon Jae-in’s refusal to hold a party convention is also Ahn Cheol-soo’s responsibility. It is his ability to rally supporters and make it impossible for Moon Jae-in to refuse. But if the leader doesn’t listen, he defects. Is it acceptable for a child to disown their father if they disagree? No. Ahn Cheol-soo himself created that party.

The most crucial quality for a politician, as with Sanders, is Sincerity (진정성). They must not deceive, lie to, or cause distress to the public. However, Sanders’ policies are too radical and left-leaning.

I discuss Destiny (사주) and Physiognomy (관상) because such topics attract more attention. In this human world, your fate is determined by your Destiny (사주) and Physiognomy (관상). However, there is something crucial you must understand from this lecture: your past up to the Byeongsin year (2016) cannot be changed. The past of Korea cannot be changed. But from today onward, anyone has the special privilege to change their fate with their own mind. You cannot change your birth into a wealthy family if you were not born into one. Those who realize this quickly succeed. If your spouse displeases you, you cannot change that up to 2016. Therefore, there is no point in fighting over what cannot be changed. Your past, up to today, is your karmic burden from previous lives. Even if a truck hits you and severs your legs, it is your karma. So, there is no need to resent the past. Yet, people fall ill because of an unchangeable past.

What we must understand is that from today onward, your fate is determined by your karmic burden plus the enlightenment gained from my lectures. From the moment you leave this lecture hall, your destiny is in your hands. This is incredibly important. In the Byeongsin year, you can freely change your destiny. To do this, you must embrace Huh Kyung-young in your heart. Those who do not will remain trapped in the past. The 300 National Assembly members cannot change our current situation. But now, an opportunity to change has arrived. Your minds will determine the future of Korea. If things continue as they are, the top 1% or 5% will control 99% of the nation’s wealth. This is the current state of America. In Korea, the top 5% hold 90% of the wealth. Soon, most people will have no money after paying off bank debts. Even if they own a house, it belongs to the bank due to interest, which often goes to foreign entities as 50% of banks are foreign-owned. So, if someone has assets, subtracting their debt often leaves them with zero. Do not envy those who appear wealthy. Banks have seized all wealth, and the middle class has largely collapsed. Many inherit only debt, leaving nothing for their children. This situation was created by politicians. Should you continue to support such individuals? It is truly serious. Your children and grandchildren will become servants to North Koreans, Chinese, and Taiwanese, cleaning their shoes and toilets to survive. The future of the Korean people is incredibly bleak. That is why I am here in Korea.

While Ahn Cheol-soo, Shin Young-kyun, and Moon Jae-in all have good appearances, Kim Moo-sung is a Dragon-Serpent (이무기상). Ahn Cheol-soo is a Goat (염소상). Sanders is an Eagle (독수리상). Why would a Goat (염소상) claim to resemble an Eagle (독수리상)? Hillary is a Peacock (공작상), always dressing elegantly and confidently. Moon Jae-in is an Ox (소상). Yoo Seong-min is a Rat (지상). Their paths are predetermined. You can tell who will become president and who will not. Park Won-soon is a Dog (개상), in a sense, the dog of Seoul citizens. However, his true Physiognomy (관상) is that of a Goat (염소상), which explains his good relationship with Ahn Cheol-soo. Park Won-soon’s protruding mouth, like Ahn Cheol-soo’s, is a Goat’s (염소) mouth, and his eyes and nose are also those of a Goat (염소). Goats and sheep do not benefit from frequent career changes. Ahn Cheol-soo, a Goat (염소상) with a Career-Changing Destiny (전업 사주), should not be changing professions. Moon Jae-in, an Ox (소상), can change professions, from lawyer to chief of staff, party leader, and presidential candidate. An Ox (소) can pull carts, plow fields, and carry loads, performing various roles. But a Goat (염소) should not change. When Ahn Cheol-soo constantly moves from place to place, his image deteriorates. A sheep stays in one place, following its owner.

I have explained these Physiognomies (상) to reveal who will become the next American president. I cannot openly discuss such matters due to legal restrictions. My Physiognomy (관상) is beyond comparison. I am mentioned in prophecies. This is the Haein Era (해인 시대), the internet era, where I descend from heaven. This is also the Eon-eo-do-dan Era (언어도단 시대), where words, scriptures, truth, and principles are meaningless. This is the era where women smoke openly on the streets, a sight rarely seen before. Such women are not suitable for marriage, as their children may be born jaundiced. This Eon-eo-do-dan Era (언어도단 시대) is also characterized by flying metal objects, airplanes, and satellites.

In this Eon-eo-do-dan Era (언어도단 시대), a person of Shin-eon-seo-pan (신원서판) will appear. This means someone with a handsome face, eloquent speech, excellent writing skills, and superior judgment. My policies, crafted 30 years ago, are being imitated by others. They have copied everything except my promise of 100 million won for marriage. I lecture in English and Chinese characters, demonstrating my eloquence. The prophecies state that such a person, possessing all these qualities, will surely come. That person is me.

Do you know when Sakyamuni Buddha ate his meals? Offerings are made to Buddha between 11 AM and 1 PM, which is the O-si (오시) period. The O-si (오시) has the strongest cosmic energy. Kings always ate their main meal during the O-si (오시). Their breakfast was light, and their main meal, the Surasang (수라상), was served after 10 AM. They would then have a light lunch, dinner, and a late-night snack, eating five times a day. They ate at 11 AM because the sun’s energy is strongest then. Eating too much breakfast between 7 and 9 AM would dissipate the Yang energy. So, they ate when the Yang energy was fully present, at 10 or 11 AM during the O-si (오시). The one who brings the word during this O-si (오시) is Huh.

In other words, I am the one who brings the words of God, who is above the cross, and the Buddha, who is above the ten directions of the world. The character “Huh” (허) signifies receiving permission, authorization, and approval. Thus, the one who comes from heaven with this authorized power is me. Comparing me to others is disrespectful. I will appear like a lightning bolt. When I become president, I will suddenly appear, and people will be overwhelmed by my popularity. During my previous presidential campaign, I was given only one TV debate at midnight. Despite this, my popularity soared. Even the Democratic Party officials discussed my campaign, acknowledging that I was the one who truly made an impact in that election, despite the low vote count. My influence was immense.

I will transform this world. I have spoken of Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong (공전멸병). This means “empty the money, destroy the soldiers.” The character for “money” (전) contains the radical for “spear” (과), symbolizing power. So, it means to destroy the soldiers who wield this power. If you remove the “soldiers” (병) from the character for “money” (전), you are left with “Kim” (김). But it is not about a person named Kim. It means to “empty Kim” (김을 비워라). When you empty Kim, only Huh remains. This was an encrypted message from ancient kings to protect the Huh family from being killed. This interpretation of the characters is unique.

The policies put forth by these politicians are worthless. You all have my 33 policies, correct? Please open them. If you have any questions, ask.

Chae In-shi is a Monkey (원숭이상). Yoo Seong-min is a Cat (고양이상), a wildcat that scratches when displeased. The reason I emphasize Physiognomy (상) is its importance. In foreign countries, and even in Korea, there are plates with sharp, knife-like protrusions, often green. Do you know which president’s wife used such a plate? First Lady Yuk Young-soo used such a plate for a year before she passed away. It resembles a gun barrel and a knife. I investigated the plates used by past presidential wives, and they all matched their fates. Those who went to prison used plates that reflected that, and those who passed away used plates that reflected that. Constantly looking at someone with bad fortune will bring you bad fortune. Therefore, even if a plate is luxurious, if it has sharp, protruding elements, you should not use it. Even a slightly chipped plate should not be used. Your fate is intertwined with such objects. You should change your husband’s, wife’s, and children’s bowls to good ones. The patterns must be auspicious. A plate with knife-like patterns, even if it’s just a leaf, is dangerous on the dining table. Human faces are the same. Looking at Ronald Reagan’s face makes you smile. That’s why Americans loved him the most. He even joked after being shot. He had such composure, and his face was amusing.

This is the Haein Era (해인 시대), and the three major elements of unification are digital, convergence, and harmony. In this era of convergence, integration, and harmony, Sanders raised his fist. Who imitated this in Korea? Ahn Cheol-soo. He raised his fist and spoke about it ten times. I usually do not criticize our politicians, but I cannot bear to watch this. I am pointing this out because it is unbearable. This era of convergence, integration, and harmony requires unity, not conflict. Yet, they advocate for fighting. Who are they fighting? The common people. Those who should be mediating conflicts are fighting in the National Assembly. Is that acceptable? Sanders, being a leftist, can act this way. But for Ahn Cheol-soo, who is potentially aligning with the Saenuri Party, to raise his fist and advocate for fighting is not a good look.

In this era of convergence, integration, and harmony, raising a fist and advocating for fighting is inappropriate. Who is the true enemy in battle? Yourself. There is no enemy in this world other than yourself. I fight with my own policies. I do not fight with the policies of other parties. I present my policies to the public, and they have never changed. For example, 25 years ago, I proposed changing the standard time to Seoul time and advancing it by 30 minutes. North Korea was the first to follow this. All my policies, except the most challenging ones, have been imitated by both ruling and opposition parties. This particular policy was even adopted by both North and South Korea. In such an era, they raise their fists and advocate for fighting. Yet, our people believe them. When I appear later, you will be speechless.

Politics is currently led by those with academic degrees, like doctorates, but they lack real-world experience. This is why Korea faces problems. The three major elements of integration are Union (연합), Assembly (집합), and Combination (결합). Yet, some politicians break alliances within their parties, splitting the traditional opposition party into two. Perhaps this is to pave the way for me to become president.

The 21st century is also an era of Convergence (융합). What is Convergence (융합)? It is Mixture (혼합), Dissolution (용해), and Fermentation (발효). Mixture (혼합) is like mixing flour. Dissolution (용해) is like melting metals to create alloys, such as 18K or 24K gold. Fermentation (발효) is like making fermented pastes or medicines. This is the era of Convergence (융합). And Harmony (화합) involves Concession (양보) and Communication (소통). In this era of Union (연합), Assembly (집합), Combination (결합), Mixture (혼합), Dissolution (용해), Fermentation (발효), Concession (양보), and Communication (소통), they raise their fists and declare they will fight. The public is utterly fed up with politicians fighting in the National Assembly.

I sang songs at various universities, but this is the first time I’ve received an instrument. Time has passed quickly. Today’s discussion about politicians is not enjoyable. Other lectures are interesting, but just hearing about politicians causes stress. I dislike even mentioning them. Of course, once I become president, you will rarely see these people.

America’s Nationalism (국수주의) is something we cannot fight against, as the U.S. protects our national security. However, it is crucial to understand why the American presidential election is important to us. America is represented by Wood (목), China by Metal (금), Japan by Fire (불), and Korea by Earth (토). Wood (목) suppresses Earth (토), meaning America suppresses us. America dominates us. But if I, Huh Kyung-young, come, America cannot suppress us. The Soviet Union is Water (수). Water (수) is suppressed by Earth (토). So, the Soviet Union follows us. Therefore, do not be deceived by the Soviet Union, and do not trust America. Japan rises, and it has risen. Fire (화) and Earth (토) help us. That’s why President Park Chung-hee brought 600 million dollars from Japan to revive our economy. That’s how we survived.

However, America currently suppresses us. North Korea, connected to America and South Korea, cannot move freely. With American aircraft carriers present, North Korea’s thousands of nuclear weapons are meaningless. Currently, America suppresses the Korean Peninsula. China is Metal (금). China and Korea have a good relationship, as Metal (금) generates Earth (토), and Earth (토) generates Metal (금). We mutually benefit each other. This is the current geopolitical situation.

Therefore, who becomes the American president matters. If Hillary becomes president, there could be war on the Korean Peninsula, as she is a hegemonist. If Sanders becomes president, America’s hegemony will decline, and our economy will collapse. If the U.S. dollar depreciates, our economy will also suffer. If Sanders becomes president, American and Korean capital will flee to Hong Kong. The flow of money determines whether a nation’s economy thrives or collapses. That is why I briefly discussed the American presidency today. Such Radicalism (급진주의) can endanger America. However, it is popular.

My Centrism (중산주의) is borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan. It cannot be compared to these other ideologies. My Centrism (중산주의) will eventually unify the world, being borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan. It possesses a truth that cannot be compared to these others. You understand the difference with my Centrism (중산주의), right?

American democracy and capitalism are now 100 years old, like a 100-year-old person. It is time for them to be discarded. Centrism (중산주의) will now lead the world. Their systems have created a situation where the top 1% of Americans hold 99% of the wealth. This means most Americans are beggars, slaves to money. Those who work hard merely enrich the wealthy.

What do we give America the most? Our trade balance is in surplus, but our current account balance is in deficit. Why? America receives a lot of royalties from us. So, while we have a trade surplus with America, our current account is in deficit. American fast-food chains like McDonald’s are all American. When we drink Coca-Cola, America collects royalties. America receives money from over 200 countries worldwide. They provide scholarships to geniuses globally, turn them into Americans, use them to obtain patents for American technology, and then collect royalties from their home countries. America dominates the global economy through its knowledge industry. American universities hold many patents. What do our universities do? Our education system is flawed.

As Sanders suggests, it is time for democracy and capitalism to be reformed into Centrism (중산주의), but Sanders cannot achieve this. America, as a nation, cannot abandon Nationalism (국수주의) because it is the issuer of the world’s reserve currency. It is difficult for America to implement reforms like ours.

Today, on this holiday, I gave this lecture so that people would watch it. You should quickly eat and return home. Thank you.

1. According to the speaker, what is the primary reason why Bernie Sanders’s “radicalism” (급진주의) is problematic for the United States?

① It would lead to the U.S. becoming more like China, a communist state.
② It would cause American capital to flee to places like Hong Kong, weakening the U.S. economy.
③ It would make the U.S. dollar’s value plummet, leading to economic collapse.
④ All of the above.

(④, The speaker argues that Sanders’s policies, such as dismantling Wall Street, would cause American capital to flee to Hong Kong, making China dominate the global economy, turning the U.S. into a “paper tiger,” and causing the dollar’s value to fall, leading to economic ruin.)

2. True or False: The speaker claims that South Korea’s direct presidential election system is more advanced than the U.S.’s indirect electoral college system.

(True, The speaker states that South Korea’s direct election system is “100 years ahead” of the U.S.’s indirect electoral college system, which he compares to Park Chung-hee’s Unification National Conference delegates.)

3. What term does the speaker use to describe politicians like Ahn Cheol-soo, Moon Jae-in, and Kim Moo-sung, who he claims merely imitate his policies?

(따라쟁이 (copycat/imitator), The speaker repeatedly refers to these politicians as “따라쟁이” because they allegedly copy his policies without fully understanding or implementing them.)

4. Fill in the blank: The speaker criticizes the American diet, specifically mentioning foods like bread, bacon, and popcorn, for containing high amounts of __, which he claims can block blood vessels.

(trans fat (트랜스 지방), The speaker warns that foods like popcorn contain “trans fat” (트랜스 지방), which can block blood vessels.)

5. According to the speaker, what is the most crucial quality for a politician to possess, especially to avoid deceiving the public?

(진정성 (sincerity/authenticity), The speaker emphasizes that “진정성” (sincerity/authenticity) is the most important quality for a politician, ensuring they don’t deceive or lie to the public.)

Intermediate

1. The speaker describes Hillary Clinton’s “gongjak-sang” (공작상, peacock-like appearance) as having both advantages and disadvantages. What are these specific traits?

(Advantages: Truthfulness/Sincerity (진실성); Disadvantages: Overly bold/assertive (당돌성), The speaker notes Hillary’s “당돌성” (overly bold/assertive nature) as a negative, making her less appealing to the public, but also mentions her “진실성” (truthfulness/sincerity) as a positive.)

2. True or False: The speaker suggests that the U.S. electoral college system was originally designed to prevent a Black person from becoming president.

(True, The speaker claims the electoral college was established by conservative forces, primarily white individuals, to ensure a white president and maintain their control, citing it as a barrier for Black candidates.)

3. The speaker categorizes politicians into two “saju” (사주, fate/destiny) types: “jeon-eop saju” (전업 사주, career-changing destiny) and “pyeonghaeng saju” (평행 사주, parallel/consistent destiny). Which type does he associate with Bernie Sanders and Ahn Cheol-soo, respectively, and how do their outcomes differ?

(Bernie Sanders: Pyeonghaeng saju (평행 사주), leading to consistent career progression; Ahn Cheol-soo: Jeon-eop saju (전업 사주), leading to declining popularity with each career change, The speaker states Sanders has a “평행 사주” (parallel/consistent destiny), staying in politics for 30 years, while Ahn Cheol-soo has a “전업 사주” (career-changing destiny), moving from doctor to CEO to professor to politician, which the speaker claims leads to his popularity decreasing with each change.)

4. According to the speaker, what are the three key elements of the “era of unification” (통일의 시대) in the 21st century, and why does he criticize politicians who “clench their fists” (주먹을 쥐다) in this context?

(The three elements are integration (통합), convergence (융합), and harmony (화합). He criticizes politicians for clenching their fists because it signifies fighting, which is contrary to the spirit of these three elements, especially when the true opponent should be oneself.)

5. The speaker mentions that the U.S. economy, despite having a trade surplus with South Korea, shows a current account deficit. What is his explanation for this discrepancy?

(The U.S. receives significant royalties from South Korea, offsetting the trade surplus, The speaker explains that while South Korea has a trade surplus with the U.S., the current account is in deficit because the U.S. collects substantial royalties (로얄티) from South Korea, particularly through intellectual property and global brands like Coca-Cola and McDonald’s.)

Advanced

1. The speaker uses animal metaphors to describe various political figures. Match the politician to the animal he associates with them:

Politician	Animal Metaphor
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders
Kim Moo-sung
Ahn Cheol-soo
Moon Jae-in
Park Won-soon

(Hillary Clinton: 공작상 (Peacock-like appearance); Bernie Sanders: 목이 긴 독수리상 (Long-necked eagle-like appearance); Kim Moo-sung: 이무기상 (Imoogi/Dragon-like appearance); Ahn Cheol-soo: 염소상 (Goat-like appearance); Moon Jae-in: 소상 (Cow-like appearance); Park Won-soon: 염소상 (Goat-like appearance), The speaker assigns specific animal “상” (appearances/characteristics) to each politician: Hillary as a peacock (공작상), Sanders as a long-necked eagle (목이 긴 독수리상), Kim Moo-sung as an Imoogi (이무기상), Ahn Cheol-soo as a goat (염소상), Moon Jae-in as a cow (소상), and Park Won-soon also as a goat (염소상).)

2. The speaker introduces the concept of “언어도단 시대” (a time when words and doctrines are meaningless) and “신원서판” (physical appearance, speech, writing, and judgment). How does he connect these concepts to his own role and the current political landscape?

(He claims the “언어도단 시대” is the current era where traditional values are lost (e.g., women smoking publicly), and he embodies “신원서판” as someone with good looks, eloquence, writing skills, and judgment. He suggests that his long-standing, consistent policies, unlike those of “copycat” politicians, prove his unique role in this era.)

3. Explain the speaker’s interpretation of the phrase “공전멸병” (空前滅兵) and how he connects it to his own surname.

(The speaker interprets “공전멸병” as “empty the ‘전’ (money/power) and destroy the ‘병’ (soldiers),” which, when applied to the character “전” (錢), means to remove the “병” (戈, spear/weapon radical) from it, leaving “금” (金, gold/metal). He then claims that “금” (Kim) should be emptied, and what remains is “허” (Heo), thus linking it to his surname, implying a hidden prophecy.)

4. The speaker discusses the influence of objects, specifically mentioning a plate used by former First Lady Yuk Young-soo. What is his broader point about the connection between objects and a person’s fate or “gwan-sang” (관상, physiognomy)?

(He argues that objects, like a plate resembling a gun barrel, can influence a person’s fate, just as one’s “gwan-sang” (physiognomy) reflects their destiny. He advises choosing auspicious objects and avoiding those with negative imagery, extending this to household items like bowls for family members.)

This excerpt is from a 2016 lecture by Huh Kyung-young, a South Korean politician known for his unconventional claims and policies. In this lecture, he analyzes the 2016 US presidential candidates (Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders) and South Korean politicians (Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, Moon Jae-in) through the lens of physiognomy (face reading) and fate (saju), while also promoting his own “Jung San Ju Ui” (Middle-Class-ism) ideology. He criticizes other politicians for “copying” his policies and warns against the dangers of their approaches to the economy and society.

Political Analysis & Physiognomy

Critique of US Presidential Candidates
Huh Kyung-young offers a unique, almost shamanistic interpretation of political figures, blending traditional Korean physiognomy with modern political commentary. His analysis of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders is particularly striking, as he attributes their political strengths and weaknesses to their “animalistic” features and inherent “saju” (fate). This approach is fascinating because it completely departs from conventional political analysis, suggesting a deeper, almost cosmic influence on leadership. It’s a bold claim that their physical traits dictate their political destiny and impact on the nation.

미국을 중국보다 더 급진적으로 몰고 가는 샌더서는 문제가 있는 거예요.
Sanders, who is pushing America to be more radical than China, has a problem.

샌더스는 급진주의는 미국의 민주당의 자파보다도 더 자쪽으로 끌고 가는데 저렇게 되면 중국보다도 더 자파가 되는 거야.
Sanders’ radicalism is pulling the Democratic Party further left than its own left wing, which would make it even more left-wing than China.

힐러리는 너무 당도래. 당도래 너무 당당한 거야. 그게 마이너스야.
Hillary is too bold. Too confident. That’s a minus.

힐러리의 당돌성과 진실성이 샌드사한테 밀리는 거야. 대중들한테.
Hillary’s boldness and sincerity are losing to Sanders among the public.

샌더서는 목이 긴 독수리상이야. 시체만 있으면 가서 뜯어 먹는 독수리.
Sanders has the face of a long-necked eagle. An eagle that tears apart corpses if they’re there.

샌드서는 진정성이 있어. 뭐 말을 하면은 저 사람이 꼭 할 거 같아.
Sanders has sincerity. When he speaks, it feels like he will definitely do what he says.

샌드는 나이가 많은데도 75시 넘었는데도 참신해 보여.
Sanders, despite being over 75, appears fresh and innovative.

Critique of South Korean Politicians
Huh Kyung-young doesn’t hold back in his criticism of South Korean politicians, accusing them of “copying” his policies without proper understanding or execution. His claim that they are mere “imitators” (따라쟁이) is a direct challenge to their originality and competence. This is particularly insightful because it highlights a common frustration among voters: the feeling that politicians lack genuine vision and merely appropriate popular ideas. His detailed breakdown of their “saju” (fate) and “animalistic” traits further underscores his belief that they are fundamentally unsuited for leadership.

안철수라는 사람이 사대주의 미국 대통령 후보로 넘더서가 자기가 샌더스를 닮았다 이런 말을 하는 거는 사대주의 발상이에요.
For Ahn Cheol-soo to say he resembles Sanders, a US presidential candidate, is a servile (sadaejuui) mindset.

내가 국회원을 100명으로 줄이겠다 그랬더니 안철수가 국회원을 100명으로 줄르겠대 그때.
I said I would reduce the number of National Assembly members to 100, and then Ahn Cheol-soo said he would reduce them to 100.

김무성 새누리당 대표는이 뭡니까? 보수주의. 아, 보수주의도 어느 정도로 해야지 인구가 증거 안 하니까 출산율을 높이려면 조선종을 데려와야 된대.
What about Saenuri Party leader Kim Moo-sung? Conservatism. Conservatism should have its limits; he says we need to bring in Joseonjok (ethnic Koreans from China) to increase the birth rate because the population isn’t growing.

문재인은 소니까 손은 구름마도 꼴다가 논도 매다가 밭도 매다가 바뀌 안 바뀌어요?
Moon Jae-in is an ox, so an ox pulls carts, plows fields, and tills land—does it change?

이런 사람들을 우리는 뭐라 그러냐? 따라쟁이라 그래요. 허경령거 따라하다가 볼일 다 보는 거야.
What do we call these people? “Copycats.” They just copy Huh Kyung-young’s stuff and get everything done.

Economic Philosophy & Vision

Critique of Current Economic Systems
Huh Kyung-young’s critique of the current economic system is sharp and direct, particularly his assertion that “1% of the upper class holds 99% of the money” in the US, and 90% in Korea. This highlights a core concern about wealth inequality and the erosion of the middle class. His vision for a “Middle-Class-ism” (중산주의) is presented as a radical alternative to both capitalism and communism, aiming to create a more equitable society. This is a powerful message for anyone concerned about economic disparity.

미국 월가의 모든 월가를 해체하였다는 거야. 그렇죠? 그러면 제2에 거기가 공산주의가 되고 중국이 민주주의가 되는 거예요.
(Sanders) wants to dismantle all of Wall Street. Right? Then that place would become a second communist state, and China would become a democracy.

미국 달러 가치가 하락하면 미국은 경제가 망하는 거예요. 서민들 도와주려다가 미국이라는 나라의 그 힐러리의 국수주의 이것은 하루 아침에 무너지는 거예요.
If the value of the US dollar falls, the American economy will collapse. Trying to help the common people, Hillary’s nationalism for the US would crumble overnight.

허경령은 월가를 해체한다 대형 은행을 없했다 이런 말 합니까? 안 합니다. 부자는 부자들을 존경받는 사회 없는 사람에게 제대로 분배해 가지고 부자가 존경받게 해주자 해 주겠다는 거지. 부작권 무조건 뺏겠다는게 아니야.
Does Huh Kyung-young say he will dismantle Wall Street or abolish large banks? No, he doesn’t. He says he will create a society where the wealthy are respected by properly distributing wealth to those who lack it, so the rich can be respected. He’s not saying he’ll just take from the rich unconditionally.

정말 이대로 가면은 1%의 상류청, 5%의 상류청이 우리나라 돈의 99%를 가지고 있는 거예요.
If things continue like this, 1% of the upper class, or 5% of the upper class, will hold 99% of our country’s money.

미국의 민주주의나 자본주의는 나이가 지금 몇 살이 됐어요? 사람을 100년으로 볼 때 몇 살이죠? 100살이 된 거예요. 100살 노인이야. 그러니까 이제 폐기 처분할 때가 됐죠?
How old are American democracy and capitalism now? If you consider a human lifespan as 100 years, they are 100 years old. They are 100-year-old elders. So, isn’t it time for them to be discarded?

The Power of “Jung San Ju Ui” (Middle-Class-ism)
Huh Kyung-young positions his “Jung San Ju Ui” as the ultimate solution for global unity and economic stability. He claims it transcends national borders, discrimination, and political factions, making it a universal truth. This is a bold, almost messianic claim, suggesting that his ideology is the only path to a harmonious future. His assertion that it will “unify the entire world” is a powerful statement of his ambition and belief in his own vision.

허경령의 중산주의는 무국경이야. 무차별이야. 무정파니까.
Huh Kyung-young’s Middle-Class-ism is borderless, non-discriminatory, and non-partisan.

허경영의 중산주의는 나중에이 전 세계를 통일하는 무국경이고 무차별이고 무정파니까 예 다 나중에 이런 것들과 비교할 수 없는 진리가 있어요.
Huh Kyung-young’s Middle-Class-ism is borderless, non-discriminatory, and non-partisan, which will eventually unify the entire world, so it possesses a truth that cannot be compared to these other things.

Personal Philosophy & Divine Mandate

The Role of a “Heaven-Sent” Leader
Huh Kyung-young presents himself not just as a politician, but as a divinely appointed figure with a cosmic mission. His claims of being “sent from heaven” to guide humanity and his ability to “change fate” are central to his persona. This self-proclaimed divine mandate is a fascinating aspect of his appeal, as it offers a sense of ultimate authority and purpose beyond conventional politics. It’s a powerful narrative that resonates with those seeking a leader with extraordinary capabilities.

나는이 강의하러 온 사람이 아니에요. 하늘에서 여러분들에게 내 이름 불러라고 알려주러 온 거야.
I didn’t come here to give lectures. I came from heaven to tell you to call my name.

오늘 이후에는 누구든지 자기 운맹을 자기 마음으로 바꿀 수 있는 특해가 주어져 있는 거예요.
From today onwards, anyone has the special privilege to change their own destiny with their own mind.

나는 이런 간상하고 비교하면은 재수가 없다는 거예요. 비교를 하면 안 되죠. 나는 아예 예언서에 나와 있어요.
Comparing me to these physiognomies is bad luck. You shouldn’t compare. I am already mentioned in prophecies.

그 자가 누구요? 천. 천억 건네. 그자가 권내 여러분이 석가모니가 밥을 먹는 시간이 몇이죠?
Who is that person? Heaven. Billions. That person is the one. What time did Sakyamuni eat his meal?

The Power of His Name & Energy
Huh Kyung-young emphasizes the supernatural power of his name and energy, claiming it can protect people from disease and even alter their destiny. This belief in the transformative power of his presence is a key element of his unique appeal. It’s a bold assertion that his name alone holds immense spiritual and protective power, offering a sense of security and hope to his followers.

나중에 엄청난 돌림병이 돌 때 허경 부른 사람과 안 부른 사람은 하늘과 땅이야.
Later, when a terrible plague spreads, those who called Huh Kyung-young’s name and those who didn’t will be as different as heaven and earth.

허경령 부르면 손이 안 떨어지지. 허경영 사진 보면 손이 안 떨어지지. 그건 기계를 해도 테스트해도 마찬가지야.
If you call Huh Kyung-young, your hand won’t drop. If you look at Huh Kyung-young’s picture, your hand won’t drop. It’s the same even if you test it with a machine.

이 마음에다가 허경영을 넣어야 돼, 안 넣어야 돼? 넣어야 돼. 넣어야 돼요.
Should you put Huh Kyung-young in your heart or not? You should. You must.

The Truth of Huh Kyung Young’s Centrist Ideology: A Critique of Global and Domestic Politics

1. Critiquing Global Political Ideologies: Nationalism, Radicalism, and the American Presidential Election
   Huh Kyung Young begins by discussing the presidential candidates in the United States, analyzing the policies of global politicians and their inherent problems. He then shifts to the global political landscape, particularly as Korea enters the “Byeongsin Year” (2016). Hillary Clinton’s policies are generally characterized by nationalism, which is seen as essential for maintaining America’s traditional identity. In contrast, Bernie Sanders’s radicalism is viewed as problematic because it pushes the U.S. further left than even China, threatening the established order. Sanders’s proposals, such as dismantling Wall Street and large banks, would cause American capital to flee to places like Hong Kong, potentially allowing China to dominate the global economy. This would effectively transform the U.S. into a communist state and elevate China to a democratic power, signifying America’s abandonment of its global leadership.

2. The American Electoral System: Indirect Elections and the Influence of Conservative Forces
   The American presidential election system is an indirect election, where citizens vote for electors who then choose the president. This contrasts with Korea’s direct election system, which Huh Kyung Young suggests is more advanced, perhaps by a century. The U.S. system, reminiscent of Korea’s past “National Conference for Unification” under President Park Chung-hee, involves 300 million Americans electing 538 electors. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win. Huh Kyung Young recalls a past election where George W. Bush and Al Gore each received 269 electoral votes, despite Gore having millions more popular votes. This illustrates that popular vote does not guarantee victory in the U.S.

Even if Sanders garners double the popular votes of Clinton, he may not secure enough electoral votes. The electoral college is dominated by conservative forces, including capitalists, financiers, and defense industrialists, who aim to preserve America’s existing power structure. This system was designed to prevent a Black president, as historically, electors were predominantly white. However, Barack Obama, whose mother was white, was able to overcome this barrier. The electoral college system ensures that a Black person cannot become president unless they have a white parent.

3. The Economic Consequences of Radical Policies and the Critique of “Sadaejuui”
   Sanders’s proposal to dismantle Wall Street would lead to a mass exodus of American capital to Hong Kong, turning the U.S. into a “paper tiger” and causing the dollar’s value to plummet. This would devastate the American economy, undermining the very nationalism that Clinton represents. Huh Kyung Young criticizes Ahn Cheol-soo for claiming to be similar to Sanders, labeling this as “Sadaejuui” (servile diplomacy or sycophancy towards a great power). He argues that such an ideology, which would weaken the U.S. dollar and its global leadership, is a dangerous proposition.

4. The Essence of Huh Kyung Young’s Philosophy: True Sun and Original Sun
   Huh Kyung Young introduces his unique philosophical concepts of “True Sun” (Jin Tae Yang) and “Original Sun” (Bon Tae Yang). The True Sun governs the life of plants and humans on Earth, while the Original Sun controls human souls. He states that his energy is unique in the universe, unlike anyone else’s. He claims that those who call his name will experience extraordinary phenomena, such as their hands being unable to fall when holding his picture. He asserts that he appeared at a critical juncture when Earth’s orbit needed correction, and that calling his name will be crucial during future pandemics. He emphasizes that he is not merely a lecturer but a divine messenger sent to Earth to guide humanity.

5. Critique of American Dietary Culture and its Health Impacts
   Huh Kyung Young criticizes American dietary habits, stating that they consume unhealthy foods. He points out that Korean ginseng grown in the U.S. loses its flavor, suggesting that American soil is unsuitable. He highlights the consumption of bread, fried pork (bacon), and hamburgers as primary sources of carcinogens. He also criticizes popcorn, often consumed in large quantities at cinemas, for containing 20 servings of trans fats, which clog blood vessels and lead to health problems like infertility. He blames the Korean Ministry of Education and government officials for failing to protect the public from such harmful food culture, which he believes America exports globally. He warns that blindly imitating American culture would be disastrous for Korea.

6. Contrasting Political Policies: Huh Kyung Young’s Centrist Approach vs. Others’
   Huh Kyung Young differentiates his policies from those of Sanders and Ahn Cheol-soo. While Sanders advocates for higher taxes on the wealthy and the dismantling of Wall Street, Huh Kyung Young does not propose such radical measures. He believes in a society where the wealthy are respected and wealth is distributed fairly to those in need, rather than simply seizing assets from the rich. He argues that current taxes on the wealthy are already substantial, and the problem lies in politicians reducing them rather than collecting them properly.

7. Critiques of Korean Political Figures: Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, and Moon Jae-in
   Huh Kyung Young extends his critique to Korean politicians. He notes that Ahn Cheol-soo imitated his proposal to reduce the number of National Assembly members to 100, despite Huh Kyung Young having advocated for this 25 years prior. He criticizes Ahn Cheol-soo’s factionalism, which he believes weakens the opposition party. He also points out that Ahn Cheol-soo, as a member of the top 1% wealthy elite, cannot genuinely represent the working class.

Regarding Kim Moo-sung, Huh Kyung Young criticizes his conservatism, particularly his suggestion to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to boost the birth rate, which he deems an “easy” solution. He argues that this ignores the fundamental issue of Koreans not marrying due to financial difficulties.

Moon Jae-in is labeled a “mimic” or “imitator” for adopting Huh Kyung Young’s proposals. For instance, Moon Jae-in proposed expanding senior welfare to 70% of the elderly, offering 200,000 won, while Huh Kyung Young had advocated for 700,000 won for all seniors 20-25 years ago. Huh Kyung Young views Moon Jae-in’s proposal as a deceptive tactic to gain votes, arguing that 200,000 won is insufficient and that politicians should reduce their own salaries and privileges to genuinely help the elderly.

8. The Financial Mismanagement of Korean Politics and the Path to Economic Recovery
   Huh Kyung Young explains that if he were president, he would implement a system similar to the U.S., mandating debit card usage for all transactions. This would create a comprehensive tax system, recovering approximately 100 trillion won in evaded taxes annually. With this revenue, he claims that even after providing 700,000 won in senior welfare, 200 trillion won would remain, highlighting the current scale of corruption and mismanagement. He questions the high salaries of bus company CEOs who do little work, accusing politicians of deceiving the public.

He warns that if the current political trajectory continues, 1% of the elite will control 99% of the nation’s wealth, mirroring the U.S. situation. In Korea, 5% of the elite already hold 90% of the wealth. He states that most middle-class citizens are burdened by debt, with their homes effectively belonging to banks, whose interest payments often go to foreign entities. He urges people not to envy the wealthy, as many are also in debt. He concludes that politicians are responsible for the collapse of the middle class and the bleak future of the Korean people, who may end up serving foreign nations.

9. Physiognomy of Presidential Candidates: Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Korean Politicians
   Huh Kyung Young analyzes the physiognomy (face reading) of various political figures.

Hillary Clinton: Possesses a “peacock face”, characterized by excessive boldness and confidence, which can be a disadvantage. Her perceived truthfulness is both a strength and a weakness, as the public often dislikes her assertiveness.
Bernie Sanders: Has a “long-necked eagle face”, symbolizing America. His strengths are his sincerity and freshness, which appeal to younger generations despite his age. His sincerity makes people believe he will fulfill his promises.
Ahn Cheol-soo: Described as a “goat face”.
Kim Moo-sung: Described as an “Imugi face” (a mythical serpent that has not yet become a dragon).
Moon Jae-in: Described as an “ox face”.
Yoo Seong-min: Described as a “rat face” or “cat face”.
Park Won-soon: Described as a “dog face” by the public, but Huh Kyung Young clarifies he has a “goat face”, explaining his good relationship with Ahn Cheol-soo.

Huh Kyung Young explains that certain “saju” (four pillars of destiny) types are suited for changing professions, while others are not. Sanders, with a “parallel saju”, is suited for a lifelong political career. Ahn Cheol-soo, with a “career-changing saju”, is not, as his popularity decreases with each career change. In contrast, Shin Young-kyun, also with a “career-changing saju,” saw his success increase with each career change (dentist to actor to businessman to politician to broadcaster). Moon Jae-in, with an “ox saju,” is suited for changing roles, like an ox performing various tasks. However, Ahn Cheol-soo, as a “goat,” is not suited for frequent changes, which leads to his decline.

10. The Significance of Sincerity in Leadership and the Power of Personal Transformation
    Huh Kyung Young emphasizes that sincerity is the most crucial quality for a politician. A sincere leader does not deceive, lie to, or cause distress to the public. While Sanders possesses sincerity, his policies are too radical and left-leaning for the U.S.

He then shifts to a profound message about personal destiny. He states that one’s past up to 2016 cannot be changed, including one’s birth circumstances or past misfortunes. He advises against dwelling on or blaming the past, as it only leads to suffering. However, he asserts that from this moment forward, individuals have the power to change their destiny through their mindset, especially by embracing his teachings. He proclaims that the “Byeongsin Year” (2016) offers a unique opportunity for people to transform their lives. He stresses that incorporating his name into one’s heart is essential for this transformation, otherwise, one will remain trapped in past patterns.

11. Prophecies of the “Haein Era” and the Arrival of a Divine Leader
    Huh Kyung Young refers to prophecies about the “Haein Era” (Internet era), where a divine being will descend from heaven. This era is characterized by widespread information (like “seals as numerous as the sea”) and a breakdown of traditional communication, where words, scriptures, and truth no longer resonate. He describes this as a time when women smoke openly and “iron lumps” (airplanes, satellites) fly through the sky.

He cites the prophecy of “Sin-eon-seo-pan” (神言書判), which describes a leader with a handsome appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing skills, and superior judgment. He claims to embody these qualities, noting that other politicians merely imitate his 30-year-old policies, except for his proposal to give 100 million won for marriage. He also connects his name, “Huh” (許), to the “Osi” (午時, 11 AM to 1 PM) when the sun’s energy is strongest, and when emperors and Buddha ate. He states that he is the one who brings the “words” during this powerful time, having received divine authority.

12. The Prophecy of “Gongjeon Myeolbyeong” and the Future of Korean Politics
    Huh Kyung Young interprets the prophecy of “Gongjeon Myeolbyeong” (空錢滅兵), which he translates as “empty money, destroy soldiers.” He explains that the character for “money” (錢) contains the radical for “spear” (戈), symbolizing power and wealth. “Destroy soldiers” (滅兵) means to eliminate the “Kim” (金) surname, which is part of the character for “money” (錢). By “emptying” or removing the “Kim” from the character, what remains is “Huh” (許). He suggests this was an ancient code to protect his lineage from kings who might have sought to eliminate him. He states that he will appear like a “thunderbolt” when he becomes president, overwhelming the public with his popularity. He recounts how, despite being given only one late-night TV debate during a past presidential election, his popularity soared, even being discussed by rival party officials.

13. The Importance of Auspicious Objects and the Dangers of Negative Symbolism
    Huh Kyung Young emphasizes the importance of auspicious objects, particularly in daily life. He recounts how former First Lady Yuk Young-soo used a plate with a design resembling a gun barrel and knives, and died within a year. He claims to have investigated the dishes used by past presidential wives and found correlations with their fates, such as imprisonment or death. He warns against using objects with negative symbolism, even if they are expensive, and stresses the importance of choosing good patterns for dishes used by family members, as these objects influence one’s destiny. He notes that President Reagan’s humorous face contributed to his popularity.

14. The Era of Integration and Harmony vs. Conflict
    Huh Kyung Young describes the current era as the “Haein Era”, characterized by integration, convergence, and harmony. He criticizes Sanders for raising his fist in a gesture of “fighting,” and Ahn Cheol-soo for imitating this gesture. He argues that leaders should promote unity, not conflict, especially when the true enemy is oneself. He states that his policies remain consistent, unlike those of other politicians who constantly change. He points out that North Korea even imitated his proposal to adjust the time zone.

He further elaborates on the three elements of integration: union, aggregation, and combination. For convergence, he lists mixing, dissolving, and fermentation. For harmony, he mentions compromise, communication, and openness. He laments that politicians, instead of embodying these principles, engage in infighting, which frustrates the public.

15. Geopolitical Analysis: The Influence of Major Powers on the Korean Peninsula
    Huh Kyung Young presents a geopolitical analysis using the Five Elements theory.

U.S. (Wood): Suppresses Korea (Earth). This signifies America’s dominant influence over the Korean Peninsula, preventing North Korea from acting freely.
Russia (Water): Is suppressed by Korea (Earth). This means Russia is subservient to Korea. He advises against trusting Russia.
Japan (Fire): Supports Korea (Earth). He cites President Park Chung-hee’s acquisition of $600 million from Japan to boost the Korean economy.
China (Metal): Supports Korea (Earth). This indicates a mutually beneficial relationship between Korea and China.

He warns that the U.S. presidential election significantly impacts Korea. A Hillary Clinton presidency, characterized by hegemonism, could lead to war on the Korean Peninsula. A Sanders presidency, while popular, would weaken American hegemony and cause the U.S. dollar to fall, leading to a collapse of the Korean economy as capital flees to Hong Kong.

16. The Obsolescence of Capitalism and Democracy, and the Rise of Centrist Ideology
    Huh Kyung Young declares that American democracy and capitalism, being “100-year-old seniors,” are now obsolete and ready for “disposal.” He asserts that his centrist ideology will now lead the world. He argues that existing systems have created a situation where 1% of the elite control 99% of the wealth, turning the majority of Americans into “beggars” enslaved by money.

He highlights that while Korea has a trade surplus with the U.S., it has a current account deficit due to royalties paid for American intellectual property, such as fast food chains and Coca-Cola. He explains that the U.S. dominates the global economy through its knowledge industry, leveraging patents and attracting global talent with scholarships. He concludes that while democracy and capitalism need to be reformed into a centrist ideology, Sanders cannot achieve this because the U.S., as the issuer of the world’s reserve currency, cannot easily implement radical reforms like Korea.

The Truth of Huh Kyung-young’s Centrist Ideology

1. Basic Information
   Lecture Session and Date: 1012th Huh Kyung-young Saturday Lecture, 2016.02.06
   One-sentence main theme or title summary: Huh Kyung-young critiques the problematic policies and political styles of various global and Korean political figures, contrasting them with his unique centrist ideology and divine mission to guide humanity.
   Location: Not specified in the source.
   Key Segments:
   Critique of US Presidential Candidates: Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s nationalism and Bernie Sanders’ radicalism, and their potential impacts on the US and global economy.
   Critique of Korean Political Figures: Examination of Ahn Cheol-soo’s sycophancy, Kim Moo-sung’s conservatism, and Moon Jae-in’s factionalism, highlighting their tendency to imitate Huh Kyung-young’s policies without proper understanding.
   The Concept of “Jeon-eop Saju” (Changing Profession Destiny): An explanation of how certain individuals are destined to change professions, with some rising and others falling, using Ahn Cheol-soo and Shin Young-kyun as examples.
   Huh Kyung-young’s Divine Mission and Prophecies: Discussion of his role as a celestial being sent to Earth to correct humanity’s destiny, emphasizing the power of his name and the arrival of the “Haein Era” (Internet Era).
   The Importance of “Gwan-sang” (Physiognomy) and Objects: How facial features and even household items like plates can influence one’s destiny, and the need to avoid “unlucky” objects or people.

2. Core Messages
   The Power to Change Destiny: While the past up to 2016 is unchangeable, from this point forward, anyone can change their destiny through their mindset.
   Explanation: This emphasizes personal agency and the transformative potential of embracing Huh Kyung-young’s teachings, especially in the “Byeongsin Year” (2016).
   Critique of Traditional Politics: Current politicians, both in Korea and globally, are “imitators” who lack genuine solutions and only exacerbate societal problems like wealth inequality.
   Explanation: Huh Kyung-young asserts that existing political systems are failing, leading to a concentration of wealth in the hands of a few and the collapse of the middle class.
   The Rise of Centrist Ideology: The current capitalist and democratic systems, now “100-year-old seniors,” are obsolete and will be replaced by Huh Kyung-young’s “Centrist Ideology” (Jungsanjuui), which is borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan.
   Explanation: This highlights his vision for a new global order that transcends existing political and economic frameworks, offering a universal solution to humanity’s problems.
   The Importance of “Jinjeongseong” (Sincerity/Authenticity): A true leader must possess sincerity, never deceiving or causing distress to the people.
   Explanation: This quality is presented as crucial for effective leadership, contrasting with the perceived insincerity of many contemporary politicians.
   The “Haein Era” and Divine Intervention: We are living in the “Haein Era” (Internet Era), a time when a divinely authorized figure, Huh Kyung-young, has appeared to guide humanity and correct the Earth’s trajectory.
   Explanation: This underscores his unique role and the urgency of his message, implying that his presence is a preordained event to prevent global catastrophe.

3. Detailed Summary
   Topic: Global and Korean Political Landscape Analysis
   Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young begins by dissecting the political stances of major US presidential candidates and prominent Korean politicians. He criticizes Hillary Clinton’s nationalism for its potential to maintain US hegemony, and Bernie Sanders’ radicalism for threatening the US economy by proposing to dismantle Wall Street and large banks, which he believes would cause capital flight to Hong Kong and empower China. He also lambasts Korean politicians like Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, and Moon Jae-in for their perceived flaws—sycophancy, outdated conservatism, and factionalism, respectively—and their tendency to merely imitate his policies without true understanding or implementation.
   Analogies/Examples:
   Sanders’ policies are likened to making the US a “paper tiger” and causing the dollar’s value to plummet, leading to economic collapse.
   Korean politicians are called “imitators” (ttarajjaengi) who copy his 33 policies, except for the “100 million won marriage grant.”
   Practical Message: The audience is urged to recognize the superficiality and inadequacy of current political leaders and their policies, both domestically and internationally.

Topic: US Electoral System and its Flaws
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young explains that the US uses an indirect electoral system (electoral college), which he claims is less democratic than Korea’s direct election system. He asserts that this system was designed by conservative forces, particularly wealthy white elites, to prevent minorities (like African Americans) from becoming president. He cites the example of the 2000 election where Al Gore won the popular vote but lost the presidency, illustrating how the electoral college can override the will of the people.
Analogies/Examples:
The US electoral college is compared to the “National Conference for Unification” system used by former Korean President Park Chung-hee.
The system is described as being controlled by “capitalists, financiers, and arms industrialists” to maintain white dominance.
Practical Message: Understand that the US political system is not as democratic as it appears and is manipulated by powerful vested interests, making popular support for candidates like Sanders insufficient for victory.

Topic: The Dangers of Western Culture and Food
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young criticizes American dietary habits and culture, claiming they are detrimental to health and contribute to various societal problems. He specifically targets foods like bread, bacon, hamburgers, and popcorn, labeling them as carcinogenic and harmful due to high trans fats. He suggests that adopting such a culture would be disastrous for Koreans.
Analogies/Examples:
American bacon is called “carcinogen number one.”
Popcorn is described as containing “20 servings of trans fat,” leading to clogged blood vessels and reproductive issues.
He contrasts Korean ginseng, which thrives in Korea but becomes a radish in American soil, to illustrate the unsuitability of American culture for Koreans.
Practical Message: Be wary of blindly adopting foreign cultures, especially American food culture, as it can have severe negative health and societal consequences.

Topic: “Jeon-eop Saju” (Changing Profession Destiny) and Political Fortunes
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young introduces the concept of “Jeon-eop Saju,” a destiny where individuals change professions. He distinguishes between those who rise with each change (like Shin Young-kyun, who transitioned from dentist to actor to businessman to politician) and those who decline (like Ahn Cheol-soo, whose popularity decreases with each career shift). He contrasts this with “Pyeonghaeng Saju” (Parallel Destiny), where individuals stick to one profession throughout their lives (like Bernie Sanders).
Analogies/Examples:
Shin Young-kyun: Dentist → Actor → Businessman → Politician → Broadcaster, with each change leading to greater success.
Ahn Cheol-soo: Doctor → CEO → Professor → Politician, with each change leading to a decline in popularity.
Bernie Sanders: A “Parallel Destiny” individual who has been in politics for 30 years.
Animals: A woman who constantly goes out will die if confined, just as a “Jeon-eop Saju” person will suffer if they don’t change professions.
Ox (Moon Jae-in) vs. Goat (Ahn Cheol-soo): An ox can change roles (plowing, pulling carts) and thrive, while a goat (sheep) should stay in one place; changing roles makes the goat “dirty” and causes decline.
Practical Message: Understanding one’s “Saju” (destiny) is crucial for success. Leaders with a “declining Jeon-eop Saju” will bring down the nation’s fortune.

Topic: The Significance of “Gwan-sang” (Physiognomy) and Objects
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young emphasizes that facial features (“Gwan-sang”) and even everyday objects carry energetic influences that affect destiny. He assigns animal “Gwan-sang” to various politicians (Hillary as a peacock, Sanders as a long-necked eagle, Ahn Cheol-soo as a goat, Moon Jae-in as an ox, Kim Moo-sung as an imugi, Yoo Seung-min as a rat/cat, Park Won-soon as a goat). He also claims that objects like plates can bring misfortune if their design resembles something negative (e.g., a gun barrel or knife).
Analogies/Examples:
Hillary Clinton: Peacock-like, too bold and confident, which is a minus, but also has “truthfulness.”
Bernie Sanders: Long-necked eagle-like, representing America’s symbol, possessing “sincerity” and “freshness.”
Yook Young-soo (former First Lady): Used a plate with a design resembling a gun barrel, and died within a year, illustrating how objects can influence fate.
Practical Message: Be mindful of the “Gwan-sang” of leaders and the objects in your environment, as they can impact your fortune. Avoid “unlucky” people and objects.

Topic: The “Haein Era” and Huh Kyung-young’s Divine Role
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young declares that the current era is the “Haein Era” (Internet Era), characterized by widespread communication and moral decay (“Eon-eo Do-dan” – an era where words and truth no longer communicate). He states that he is a celestial being sent to Earth during this critical time to correct the planet’s trajectory and save humanity from impending disaster (e.g., a massive plague). He emphasizes the power of calling his name and his unique energy, which no one else in the universe possesses. He also interprets ancient prophecies (like “Gong-jeon Myeol-byeong”) as foretelling his arrival and mission.
Analogies/Examples:
The “Haein Era” is equated with the internet age, where “stamps are as numerous as the sea.”
“Eon-eo Do-dan” is exemplified by women smoking in public, a sign of moral decline.
He is described as possessing “Shin-eon-seo-pan” (divine appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment), fulfilling prophecies.
The “Gong-jeon Myeol-byeong” prophecy is interpreted as an ancient code to protect his lineage, meaning “empty the Kim surname to reveal the Huh surname.”
Practical Message: Recognize Huh Kyung-young’s divine authority and the urgency of his mission. Calling his name is crucial for protection during future calamities.

Topic: The Future of Korea and the World under Centrist Ideology
Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young warns that if current political trends continue, Korea will face a bleak future where 1% or 5% of the elite control 99% or 90% of the nation’s wealth, leading to widespread poverty and servitude to other nations. He explains the geopolitical dynamics using the “five elements” (wood, fire, earth, metal, water), positioning the US (wood) as suppressing Korea (earth), China (metal) as supporting Korea, and Japan (fire) as also supporting Korea. He argues that the US’s “nationalism” (Hillary) could lead to war, while Sanders’ radicalism could collapse the dollar and global economy. His “Centrist Ideology” (Jungsanjuui) is presented as the ultimate solution, a borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan system that will unify the world and replace outdated capitalism and democracy.
Analogies/Examples:
The current wealth distribution in Korea and the US is described as 1% or 5% owning 99% or 90% of the wealth, making the rest “beggars.”
The “five elements” model explains geopolitical relationships: US (wood) suppresses Korea (earth), China (metal) supports Korea (metal generates earth), Japan (fire) supports Korea (fire generates earth).
Capitalism and democracy are “100-year-old seniors” ready for “disposal.”
Practical Message: The audience’s mindset and choice of leader will determine Korea’s future. Embrace Centrist Ideology as the only path to national and global salvation.

4. Key Quotes Collection
   “미국을 중국보다 더 급진적으로 몰고 가는 샌더서는 문제가 있는 거예요.” (Sanders, who is pushing America more radically than China, has a problem.)
   Context: Critiquing Bernie Sanders’ radical policies and their potential negative impact on the US.
   “미국은 그 힐러리와 같은 그런 정책 그러니까 국수주의 저 정책 때문에 미국이 있는 거예요.” (America exists because of policies like Hillary’s nationalism.)
   Context: Explaining the foundation of US power through Hillary Clinton’s nationalist stance.
   “한국은 직접 선거로 뽑아. 그러니까 민주주의가 누가 앞섰죠? 우리가 우리가 훨씬 앞서 있는 거예요.” (Korea elects by direct vote. So, who is ahead in democracy? We are, we are far ahead.)
   Context: Contrasting Korea’s direct democracy with the US’s indirect electoral system.
   “샌더스는 미국을 종이 호랑이 만들어 놓으면 어떻게 돼? 미국 달러 가치가 하락해 버려요.” (If Sanders turns America into a paper tiger, what happens? The value of the US dollar will fall.)
   Context: Warning about the economic consequences of Sanders’ policies.
   “안철수라는 사람이 사대주의 미국 대통령 후보로 넘더서가 자기가 샌더스를 닮았다 이런 말을 하는 거는 사대주의 발상이에요.” (For Ahn Cheol-soo to say he resembles Sanders, a US presidential candidate, is a sycophantic idea.)
   Context: Criticizing Ahn Cheol-soo’s perceived sycophancy towards US politics.
   “허경령은 월가를 해체한다 대형 은행을 없했다 이런 말 합니까? 안 합니다.” (Does Huh Kyung-young say he will dismantle Wall Street or abolish large banks? No, he doesn’t.)
   Context: Differentiating his economic policies from Sanders’ radical proposals.
   “나는 25년 전에 이야기한 정치 인생 30년이 된 사람인데 그 사람은 정치 인생이 몇 년 안 돼서 그래요.” (I am a person with 30 years of political life, having spoken about these things 25 years ago, but that person has only had a few years in politics.)
   Context: Asserting his long-standing political experience and originality compared to other politicians.
   “노인 수당 20만 원 노인 가지고 장난하는 거예요.” (200,000 won for elderly allowance is playing games with the elderly.)
   Context: Criticizing other politicians’ insufficient welfare policies for the elderly.
   “허경령의 에너지와 닮은 사람은 한백거 없어. 나구는 전부 반대야.” (There is no one who resembles Huh Kyung-young’s energy. Everyone else is the opposite.)
   Context: Emphasizing his unique and unparalleled divine energy.
   “오늘 이후에는 자기의 전생의 업보 플라서 뭐가 있죠? 내가 허경리한테 강의를 들어서 깨달은 마음 그래 안 그래요? 그게 내 운명을 바꿔줘, 안 바꿔줘? 바꿔 줄 수가 있다 이때니까.” (From today onwards, what do you have in addition to your past karma? The enlightened mind you gained from listening to Huh Kyung-young’s lecture, right? That can change your destiny, can’t it? It can change it now.)
   Context: Explaining the power of his teachings to transform one’s destiny from the present moment.
   “미국 달러 가치가 떨어지면 우리 경제도 망해요.” (If the value of the US dollar falls, our economy also collapses.)
   Context: Highlighting the interconnectedness of the global economy and the impact of US policies on Korea.
   “미국의 민주주의나 자본주의는 나이가 지금 몇 살이 됐어요? 사람을 100년으로 볼 때 몇 살이죠? 100살이 된 거예요. 100살 노인이야. 그러니까 이제 폐기 처분할 때가 됐죠?” (How old are American democracy and capitalism now? If you consider a human life as 100 years, how old are they? They are 100 years old. They are 100-year-old seniors. So, isn’t it time to dispose of them?)
   Context: Declaring the obsolescence of existing political and economic systems.

5. Mindmap Structure
   Core theme of today’s lecture by Huh Kyung-young: The Inadequacy of Current Politics and the Dawn of Centrist Ideology
   Level-1: Critique of Global Politics
   Level-2: US Presidential Candidates
   Level-3: Hillary Clinton (Nationalism, “Peacock-like,” too bold, but truthful)
   Level-3: Bernie Sanders (Radicalism, “Long-necked Eagle-like,” sincere, fresh, but problematic policies)
   Level-4: Threat to US economy (Wall Street, dollar value)
   Level-2: US Electoral System (Indirect, less democratic, controlled by elites)
   Level-1: Critique of Korean Politics
   Level-2: Ahn Cheol-soo (Sycophancy, “Goat-like,” “Jeon-eop Saju” leading to decline, imitates policies)
   Level-2: Kim Moo-sung (Conservatism, “Imugi-like,” outdated policies like bringing in 조선족 for birthrate)
   Level-2: Moon Jae-in (Factionalism, “Ox-like,” imitates policies, insufficient welfare)
   Level-2: Other Politicians (Yoo Seung-min “Rat/Cat-like,” Park Won-soon “Goat-like”)
   Level-2: Common Flaws (Imitation, lack of sincerity, playing games with welfare)
   Level-1: Huh Kyung-young’s Divine Mission and Teachings
   Level-2: The “Haein Era” (Internet Era, “Eon-eo Do-dan” – moral decay)
   Level-2: His Role (Celestial being, sent to Earth to correct destiny, possesses unique energy)
   Level-3: Prophecies (Gong-jeon Myeol-byeong, Shin-eon-seo-pan)
   Level-3: Power of His Name (Protection from plague, destiny change)
   Level-2: Centrist Ideology (Jungsanjuui) (Borderless, indiscriminate, non-partisan, replaces outdated systems)
   Level-3: Solution to wealth inequality (1% owning 99%)
   Level-1: Destiny and Influence
   Level-2: “Jeon-eop Saju” (Changing Profession Destiny)
   Level-3: Rising (Shin Young-kyun) vs. Falling (Ahn Cheol-soo)
   Level-2: “Gwan-sang” (Physiognomy) and Objects (Influence on fate, avoid “unlucky” items/people)
   Level-2: Changing Destiny (Past unchangeable, future changeable through mindset and his teachings)
   Level-1: Geopolitical Dynamics
   Level-2: Five Elements Model (US-Wood, Korea-Earth, China-Metal, Japan-Fire, Russia-Water)
   Level-3: US suppresses Korea
   Level-3: China supports Korea
   Level-3: Japan supports Korea
   Level-3: Russia is controlled by Korea
   Level-1: Call to Action
   Level-2: Reject current politicians
   Level-2: Embrace Centrist Ideology
   Level-2: Call his name

6. Historical / Doctrinal Connections
   This lecture builds upon Huh Kyung-young’s established teachings by:

Reinforcing the Critique of Existing Systems: His long-standing criticism of traditional politics, capitalism, and democracy is reiterated, emphasizing their obsolescence and failure to address societal problems like wealth inequality. This connects to his “33 policies” which aim to fundamentally restructure society.
Elaborating on His Divine-Human Theory: The lecture further solidifies his claim as a celestial being with unique powers and a preordained mission. The discussion of the “Haein Era” and his ability to change destiny through his name directly relates to his divine-human identity and the concept of “spiritual energy” (yeongseong energy) that he frequently references.
Expanding on the Concept of Destiny and Influence: While he has always spoken about destiny, this lecture introduces “Jeon-eop Saju” and the detailed analysis of “Gwan-sang” and even inanimate objects (like plates) as powerful determinants of fate. This adds a layer of practical application to his broader teachings on individual and national destiny.
Introducing “Centrist Ideology” (Jungsanjuui) as the Ultimate Solution: This lecture explicitly positions “Centrist Ideology” as the successor to outdated capitalism and democracy, a concept that unifies the world without borders, discrimination, or partisanship. This is a significant development, presenting a clear alternative to existing global systems.
Geopolitical Analysis through Five Elements: The application of the “five elements” theory to international relations (US, Korea, China, Japan, Russia) is a newly emphasized point, providing a unique framework for understanding global power dynamics and Korea’s position within them.

7. Action Items & Blessing Guidance
   Change Your Mindset: Recognize that while your past is unchangeable, your future destiny can be altered from this moment forward by consciously choosing to embrace Huh Kyung-young’s teachings and putting his name in your heart.
   Reject Corrupt Politics: Do not be swayed by the “imitator” politicians who offer superficial solutions or engage in factionalism. Understand that they are leading the nation towards ruin.
   Be Mindful of Your Environment: Pay attention to the “Gwan-sang” (physiognomy) of people around you and the objects you use, especially household items like plates. Avoid “unlucky” designs or people, as they can negatively impact your fortune.
   Call Huh Kyung-young’s Name: His name carries immense energy and is crucial for protection during future calamities and for elevating your blessing level.
   Educate Yourself: Listen to his lectures to gain true understanding and avoid being deceived by conventional wisdom or political rhetoric.

8. One-Sentence Overall Summary
   Huh Kyung-young asserts his divine mission to replace the failing global political and economic systems with his borderless Centrist Ideology, urging humanity to change their destiny by embracing his teachings and recognizing the superficiality of current leaders.

국수주의(國粹主義)-(국(國)-nation, 수(粹)-essence, 주의(主義)-ism)

급진주의(急進主義)-(급(急)-rapid, 진(進)-progress, 주의(主義)-ism)
사대주의(事大主義)-(사(事)-serve, 대(大)-great, 주의(主義)-ism)
보수주의(保守主義)-(보(保)-conserve, 수(守)-guard, 주의(主義)-ism)
분파주의(分派主義)-(분(分)-divide, 파(派)-faction, 주의(主義)-ism)
중산주의(中産主義)-(중(中)-middle, 산(産)-class, 주의(主義)-ism)
정통성(正統性)-(정(正)-orthodoxy, 통(統)-lineage, 성(性)-nature)
간접선거(間接選擧)-(간접(間接)-indirect, 선거(選擧)-election)
직접선거(直接選擧)-(직접(直接)-direct, 선거(選擧)-election)
선거인단(選擧人團)-(선거(選擧)-election, 인(人)-person, 단(團)-group)
자본(資本)-(자(資)-capital, 본(本)-root)
금융(金融)-(금(金)-money, 융(融)-flow)
군수산업(軍需産業)-(군(軍)-military, 수(需)-supply, 산업(産業)-industry)
공산주의(共産主義)-(공(共)-common, 산(産)-production, 주의(主義)-ism)
기도권(旣得權)-(기(旣)-already, 득(得)-obtained, 권(權)-right)
사대주의(事大主義)-(사(事)-serve, 대(大)-great, 주의(主義)-ism)
발상(發想)-(발(發)-generate, 상(想)-idea)
진태양(眞太陽)-(진(眞)-true, 태양(太陽)-sun)
본태양(本太陽)-(본(本)-original, 태양(太陽)-sun)
궤도수정(軌道修正)-(궤도(軌道)-orbit, 수정(修正)-correction)
돌림병(돌림病)-(돌림-circulating, 병(病)-disease)
지상(地上)-(지(地)-earth, 상(上)-above)
국민(國民)-(국(國)-nation, 민(民)-people)
식문화(食文化)-(식(食)-food, 문화(文化)-culture)
하락(下落)-(하(下)-fall, 락(落)-drop)
정책(政策)-(정(政)-politics, 책(策)-plan)
분배(分配)-(분(分)-distribute, 배(配)-allot)
국회의원(國會議員)-(국회(國會)-national assembly, 의원(議員)-member)
정치인생(政治人生)-(정치(政治)-political, 인생(人生)-life)
분파(分派)-(분(分)-divide, 파(派)-faction)
야당(野黨)-(야(野)-opposition, 당(黨)-party)
개혁(改革)-(개(改)-reform, 혁(革)-change)
상류층(上流層)-(상(上)-upper, 류(流)-stream, 층(層)-class)
노동자(勞動者)-(노동(勞動)-labor, 자(者)-person)
서민(庶民)-(서(庶)-common, 민(民)-people)
재벌(財閥)-(재(財)-wealth, 벌(閥)-clique)
보수주의(保守主義)-(보(保)-conserve, 수(守)-guard, 주의(主義)-ism)
출산율(出産率)-(출산(出産)-birth, 율(率)-rate)
모방(模倣)-(모(模)-imitate, 방(倣)-copy)
노인수당(老人手當)-(노인(老人)-elderly, 수당(手當)-allowance)
기만(欺瞞)-(기(欺)-deceive, 만(瞞)-hide)
직불카드(直拂카드)-(직(直)-direct, 불(拂)-payment, 카드-card)
세금제도(稅金制度)-(세금(稅金)-tax, 제도(制度)-system)
탈루(脫漏)-(탈(脫)-evade, 루(漏)-leak)
예산(豫算)-(예(豫)-preliminary, 산(算)-calculation)
연봉(年俸)-(연(年)-annual, 봉(俸)-salary)
관상(觀相)-(관(觀)-observe, 상(相)-face)
진정성(眞正性)-(진정(眞正)-sincerity, 성(性)-nature)
참신성(斬新性)-(참신(斬新)-novelty, 성(性)-nature)
중산주의(中産主義)-(중(中)-middle, 산(産)-class, 주의(主義)-ism)
전업사주(轉業四柱)-(전(轉)-change, 업(業)-occupation, 사주(四柱)-four pillars of destiny)
평행사주(平行四柱)-(평행(平行)-parallel, 사주(四柱)-four pillars of destiny)
국운(國運)-(국(國)-nation, 운(運)-fortune)
상승(上昇)-(상(上)-rise, 승(昇)-ascend)
구데타(クーデター)-(구데타-coup d’état)
외채(外債)-(외(外)-foreign, 채(債)-debt)
발행(發行)-(발(發)-issue, 행(行)-circulate)
천벌(天罰)-(천(天)-heaven, 벌(罰)-punishment)
운명(運命)-(운(運)-fortune, 명(命)-destiny)
전생(前生)-(전(前)-previous, 생(生)-life)
업보(業報)-(업(業)-karma, 보(報)-retribution)
미래(未來)-(미(未)-not yet, 래(來)-come)
상속(相續)-(상(相)-inherit, 속(續)-continue)
한민족(韓民族)-(한(韓)-Korean, 민족(民族)-ethnic group)
패권주의(覇權主義)-(패권(覇權)-hegemony, 주의(主義)-ism)
무국경(無國境)-(무(無)-no, 국경(國境)-border)
무차별(無差別)-(무(無)-no, 차별(差別)-discrimination)
무정파(無政派)-(무(無)-no, 정파(政派)-political faction)
자본주의(資本主義)-(자본(資本)-capital, 주의(主義)-ism)
민주주의(民主主義)-(민주(民主)-democracy, 주의(主義)-ism)
폐기처분(廢棄處分)-(폐기(廢棄)-discard, 처분(處分)-disposal)
로얄티(royalty)-(로얄티-royalty)
무역수지(貿易收支)-(무역(貿易)-trade, 수지(收支)-balance)
경상수지(經常收支)-(경상(經常)-current, 수지(收支)-balance)
흑자(黑字)-(흑(黑)-black, 자(字)-character (surplus))
적자(赤字)-(적(赤)-red, 자(字)-character (deficit))
지식산업(知識産業)-(지식(知識)-knowledge, 산업(産業)-industry)
특허권(特許權)-(특허(特許)-patent, 권(權)-right)
기축통화(基軸通貨)-(기축(基軸)-key, 통화(通貨)-currency)

The Truth of Hillary’s Nationalism, Sanders’ Radicalism, Ahn Cheol-soo’s Sadaejuui, Kim Moo-sung’s Conservatism, Moon Jae-in’s Factionalism, and Huh Kyung Young’s Centrist Ideology 🔴1012th Huh Kyung Young Saturday Lecture (2016.02.06)

Keyword Frequency
America: 28
people: 24
policy: 17
Sanders: 16
president: 15
money: 14
election: 11
Korea: 10
Hillary: 9
job: 9

Today’s Central Metaphor
The lecture uses the metaphor of “animal physiognomy” (상) to characterize political figures, suggesting that their inherent nature, like that of an animal, dictates their political actions and destiny.

Lecture in Numbers
100 years: Korea is 100 years ahead of the US in direct democracy.
300 million: The population of the United States.
538: The number of electoral college votes in the US.
269: The number of electoral votes needed to win the US presidency (half of 538).
230: The number of electoral votes mentioned as needed to become president, possibly a misstatement or specific scenario.
20%: The percentage of elderly currently receiving a 200,000 won allowance under Park Geun-hye’s policy.
70%: The percentage of elderly Moon Jae-in proposed to give a 200,000 won allowance.
700,000 won: The amount Huh Kyung Young proposed for elderly allowance from 20-25 years ago.
100 trillion won: The estimated amount of tax evasion annually in Korea.
200 trillion won: The amount of money remaining after implementing Huh Kyung Young’s policies, including 700,000 won for the elderly.
40-50 million won: The annual salary of a bus company president, questioned as excessive.
2,000 billion won: Ahn Cheol-soo’s reported personal wealth.
1%: The percentage of the upper class that Ahn Cheol-soo belongs to.
5%: The percentage of the upper class in Korea that holds 90% of the nation’s wealth.
99%: The percentage of wealth held by the top 1% in the US.
30 years: Huh Kyung Young’s political career length.
25 years: The period Huh Kyung Young has been advocating for his policies, including the 700,000 won elderly allowance.
1 year: The duration Yoo Kyung-soo used a specific plate before her death.
30 minutes: The proposed time adjustment for Korea’s standard time.
600 million dollars: The amount of money Park Chung-hee brought from Japan to revive the Korean economy.
100 years: The age of American democracy and capitalism, suggesting it’s time for a change.
200-something: The number of countries paying royalties to the US.

Signature Sentence
“The past up until today, 2016, cannot be changed by anyone.”

Concise Summary & Highlights
Huh Kyung Young critiques global and Korean politicians’ flawed policies, advocating his “Centrist Ideology” as the solution.
Huh Kyung Young criticizes US presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders for their policies, labeling Hillary’s as “nationalism” and Sanders’ as “radicalism.”
He argues that Sanders’ radical policies, like abolishing Wall Street, would cause US capital to flee to Hong Kong, empowering China.
Huh Kyung Young contrasts the US indirect election system with Korea’s direct election, claiming Korea is 100 years ahead in democracy.
He criticizes Korean politicians Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, and Moon Jae-in for their “Sadaejuui” (servility to great powers), “conservatism,” and “factionalism,” respectively, and for merely imitating his policies.
He introduces the concept of “occupational fate” (전업 사주) and “parallel fate” (평행 사주) to explain why some politicians succeed by changing careers while others fail.
Huh Kyung Young asserts his divine mission to save humanity and Korea, emphasizing the power of his name and the ability to change one’s destiny from 2016 onwards.
He warns against the dangers of American food culture and its negative health impacts on Koreans.

Scriptural / Religious Citations
Cheonbukgyeong (천북경): A reference to a scripture where “Bonsin Bontae-yang” (본신 본태양) is mentioned.
Haein Era (해인 시대): A prophetic era mentioned in prophecies, described as the “internet era” where “stamps are as numerous as the sea.”
Eon-eododan Era (언어도단 시대): A prophetic era where “words, scriptures, and truth do not communicate,” characterized by women smoking in public and flying machines.
Shin-eon-seopan (신원서판): A concept from ancient texts describing a person with a good appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment.
Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong (공전멸병): A cryptic phrase from ancient prophecies, interpreted by Huh Kyung Young as “empty the money, destroy the soldiers,” which he deciphers to reveal his surname, “Huh.”

Historical & Epochal Context
The lecture is situated in the mid-2010s, specifically 2016 (the “Byeongsin Year” ), a period marked by significant political discourse in both the US (presidential primaries with Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders) and Korea (discussions around presidential candidates like Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, and Moon Jae-in). It also references the legacy of past Korean leaders like Park Chung-hee and the ongoing influence of American culture and economy on Korea. The speaker frames this period as the “Haein Era” (internet era) and “Eon-eododan Era” (an era of moral and communicative breakdown), suggesting a critical juncture for humanity and Korea’s destiny.

Key Figures & Events Referenced
Hillary Clinton: US presidential candidate, described as having “nationalism” and a “peacock-like” physiognomy, characterized by being “bold” and having “truthfulness.”
Bernie Sanders: US presidential candidate, described as having “radicalism” and an “eagle-like” physiognomy, characterized by “sincerity” and “freshness.” His policies are criticized for potentially harming the US economy.
Ahn Cheol-soo: Korean politician, criticized for “Sadaejuui” (servility to great powers) and for imitating Sanders. Described as having a “goat-like” physiognomy and a “career-changing fate” that leads to decline.
Kim Moo-sung: Korean politician (then Saenuri Party leader), criticized for “conservatism” and proposing to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to boost birth rates. Described as having an “Imugi-like” (mythical serpent) physiognomy.
Moon Jae-in: Korean politician, criticized for “factionalism” and “imitationism” of Huh Kyung Young’s policies, particularly regarding elderly allowances. Described as having an “ox-like” physiognomy.
Park Geun-hye: Then-President of Korea, mentioned in the context of elderly allowance policy.
Park Chung-hee: Former President of Korea, mentioned as the only leader who elevated the nation’s destiny through a “coup d’état” and brought in funds from Japan.
Shin Young-kyun: Korean actor and politician, used as an example of a “career-changing fate” that leads to success.
Yoo Kyung-soo: Wife of former President Park Chung-hee, mentioned in the context of a plate she used, which is interpreted as a bad omen.
Ronald Reagan: Former US President, mentioned for his humorous and popular image.
Yoo Seong-min: Korean politician, described as having a “rat-like” or “cat-like” physiognomy.
Park Won-soon: Former Mayor of Seoul, described as having a “dog-like” or “goat-like” physiognomy, and his relationship with Ahn Cheol-soo is noted.
Obama: Former US President, mentioned in the context of the US indirect election system and racial dynamics.
Gore: Former US Vice President, mentioned in the context of the 2000 US presidential election where he won the popular vote but lost the electoral college.
Bush: Former US President, mentioned in the context of the 2000 US presidential election.
Kim Il-sung: Former leader of North Korea, mentioned in a hypothetical scenario about a politician who praised him becoming a Korean National Assembly member.
North Korea: Mentioned as having imitated Huh Kyung Young’s time zone policy.

Core Concept Definitions
Nationalism (국수주의): A policy or ideology that prioritizes the interests of one’s own nation above all others. In the context of Hillary Clinton, it refers to policies that maintain America’s traditional power and influence.
Radicalism (급진주의): An ideology advocating for drastic and fundamental changes in society or politics. Applied to Bernie Sanders, it refers to his proposals to dismantle Wall Street and large banks, which Huh Kyung Young views as destabilizing.
Sadaejuui (사대주의): A historical Korean term meaning “serving the great” or “flunkeyism,” referring to a subservient attitude towards a more powerful nation. Huh Kyung Young applies this to Ahn Cheol-soo for imitating Sanders’ policies.
Conservatism (보수주의): A political philosophy that advocates for the preservation of traditional institutions and values. Applied to Kim Moo-sung, it is criticized for proposing outdated or ineffective solutions like importing ethnic Koreans to boost birth rates.
Factionalism (분파주의): The tendency to form small, often conflicting, groups within a larger organization or party. Applied to Moon Jae-in, it is criticized for creating divisions within the opposition party.
Centrist Ideology (중산주의): Huh Kyung Young’s own political philosophy, described as “borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan,” aiming to unify the world and transcend existing ideologies like capitalism and democracy.
Indirect Election (간접 선거): A system where voters elect representatives (electors) who then choose the ultimate officeholder, as in the US presidential election.
Direct Election (직접 선거): A system where voters directly choose the officeholder, as in the Korean presidential election.
Occupational Fate (전업 사주): A personal destiny characterized by frequently changing professions. The speaker distinguishes between those whose careers improve with changes (like Shin Young-kyun) and those whose careers decline (like Ahn Cheol-soo).
Parallel Fate (평행 사주): A personal destiny characterized by maintaining a single profession throughout one’s life, typically in politics. Applied to Bernie Sanders.
Truthfulness (진실성): The quality of being honest and sincere. Attributed to Hillary Clinton as both a strength and weakness.
Sincerity (진정성): The quality of being genuine and earnest. Attributed to Bernie Sanders and Huh Kyung Young as a key factor in their appeal.
Freshness (참신성): The quality of being new, original, or innovative. Attributed to Bernie Sanders despite his age.
Boldness (당돌성): The quality of being audacious or assertive. Attributed to Hillary Clinton as a negative trait for a female politician.
Haein Era (해인 시대): A prophetic era, interpreted as the “internet era” or “digital era,” characterized by widespread information and communication.
Eon-eododan Era (언어도단 시대): A prophetic era where “words, scriptures, and truth do not communicate,” signifying a breakdown of traditional values and communication.
Shin-eon-seopan (신원서판): A traditional concept describing an ideal person with a good appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment. Huh Kyung Young claims to embody this.
Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong (공전멸병): A cryptic phrase from ancient prophecies, interpreted by Huh Kyung Young as an encoded message revealing his surname and destiny.
Integration (통합), Fusion (융합), Harmony (화합): The three key elements of the 21st-century era, contrasting with the “fighting” and “fist-waving” approach of some politicians.
Royalty (로얄티): Payments made for the use of intellectual property, patents, or trademarks. Mentioned as a way the US extracts wealth from other countries.

Central Questions & Answers
Central Question: What are the fundamental flaws in the policies and characters of current political leaders, both globally and in Korea, and how do these flaws threaten the future of nations?
Speaker’s Answer: Current political leaders are either too nationalistic, radical, subservient, conservative, or factional, and many merely imitate Huh Kyung Young’s policies without understanding their true intent. Their personal “fates” (saju) and “physiognomies” (sang) also indicate their unsuitability for leadership. The solution lies in embracing Huh Kyung Young’s “Centrist Ideology,” which is borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan, and in individuals choosing to change their destiny by following his teachings.

Conclusion & Strategic / Philosophical Implications
The lecture concludes with a strong assertion of Huh Kyung Young’s unique divine mission to save Korea and the world. He states that he is not merely a lecturer but a celestial being sent to guide humanity, especially during the “Byeongsin Year” (2016), which marks a turning point where individuals can choose to change their destiny by embracing his teachings. The strategic implication is a call for a radical shift away from conventional politics and ideologies (capitalism, democracy) towards his “Centrist Ideology,” which he claims will unify the world and prevent national collapse. Philosophically, it posits that individual and national destinies are not fixed but can be altered through conscious choice and adherence to his “truth,” contrasting with the predetermined “fates” of other politicians. The lecture implies that failure to follow his path will lead to severe consequences, including economic ruin and national subservience.

Cross-Referencing
Huh Kyung Young’s 33 Pledges: The speaker frequently references his own 33 presidential pledges, claiming that other politicians merely imitate them, except for the “100 million won marriage allowance.”
Park Chung-hee’s Economic Development: The lecture draws a parallel between Park Chung-hee’s actions (bringing 600 million dollars from Japan) and a leader who can elevate the nation’s destiny.
US Indirect Election System: The speaker compares the US system to Korea’s past “National Conference for Unification” (통일주체국민회의) under Park Chung-hee, implying it is less democratic.
Prophecies of a Divine Leader: The lecture alludes to ancient prophecies (Haein Era, Eon-eododan Era, Shin-eon-seopan, Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong) that foretell the arrival of a unique leader, implicitly identifying himself as that figure.

Multilingual Translation Strategy
To produce reliable high-quality translations, a multi-stage workflow is recommended:
Initial Machine Translation (MT): Use a robust MT engine (e.g., DeepL, Google Translate) to generate a first pass of the transcript.
Domain-Specific Glossary Development: Create a glossary of key political terms (e.g., “Sadaejuui,” “Centrist Ideology,” “occupational fate,” “physiognomy”), proper nouns (politicians’ names, specific places), and unique concepts (e.g., “Haein Era,” “Eon-eododan Era,” “Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong”) with their established or intended English equivalents. This ensures consistency and accuracy for specialized vocabulary.
Human Post-Editing (HPE) by Bilingual Experts: Engage professional human translators fluent in both Korean and the target language (English, etc.) to post-edit the MT output. These editors should:
Correct grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and mistranslations.
Ensure cultural nuances and idiomatic expressions are accurately conveyed.
Verify the consistency of the glossary terms.
Pay close attention to the speaker’s unique tone and rhetorical style.
Contextual Review: A second human reviewer, ideally with some understanding of Korean political discourse and the speaker’s background, should review the HPE output to ensure the overall meaning, intent, and impact of the lecture are preserved. This step is crucial for content that might be highly metaphorical or culturally specific.
Native Speaker Proofreading: A native speaker of the target language should proofread the final text for natural flow, readability, and any remaining linguistic errors.
Timestamp Alignment: Ensure that the translated text is accurately aligned with the original video’s timestamps for subtitle generation.

Content Gaps & Unaddressed Areas
Specifics of “Centrist Ideology”: While “Centrist Ideology” is presented as the ultimate solution, its concrete policies and mechanisms are not detailed beyond being “borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan.” More specific examples of how it would operate in practice would strengthen the argument.
Evidence for Prophecies: The lecture frequently references ancient prophecies and their interpretations (Haein Era, Eon-eododan Era, Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong) without providing the original textual sources or scholarly context for these interpretations. This leaves a gap for those unfamiliar with these specific prophecies.
Mechanism of Destiny Change: The claim that individuals can change their destiny from 2016 onwards by “putting Huh Kyung Young in their hearts” is stated without a clear explanation of the mechanism or process involved.
Financial Feasibility of Pledges: While the speaker claims his policies would leave 200 trillion won remaining after implementation, the detailed financial models or economic analyses supporting these figures are not provided.
Critique of US Indirect Election: The assertion that the US indirect election system was designed to prevent a Black president is a strong claim that lacks direct evidence within the transcript, though it is presented as a historical fact.
Detailed Critique of Opponents’ Policies: While opponents’ policies are criticized, the specific details of those policies are often summarized briefly, and a more in-depth analysis of their potential merits or flaws from a conventional perspective is absent.

Future Predictions & Prophetic Statements
China’s Economic Dominance: If Sanders’ policies are implemented, US capital will flee to Hong Kong, leading China to dominate the world economy.
US as a Paper Tiger: Sanders’ policies would turn the US into a “paper tiger,” causing the dollar’s value to plummet and the US economy to collapse.
Future Pandemics: When a “terrible plague” (돌림병) spreads, those who call Huh Kyung Young’s name will be vastly different from those who don’t.
Korea’s Future Servitude: If current political trends continue, future generations of Koreans will be subservient to people from North Korea, China, and Taiwan, performing menial jobs.
Disappearance of Disobedient Leaders: Presidents of nations who do not listen to Huh Kyung Young will “disappear quietly.”
Huh Kyung Young’s Sudden Rise to Presidency: Huh Kyung Young will appear “like lightning” when he becomes president, with an overwhelming popularity that people cannot handle.
End of Current Political Figures: After Huh Kyung Young becomes president, current political figures will be “difficult to see.”
Hillary’s Presidency and War: If Hillary becomes president, there could be a war on the Korean Peninsula due to her “hegemonic” tendencies.
Sanders’ Presidency and Economic Collapse: If Sanders becomes president, US hegemony will decline, and the Korean economy will collapse as the US dollar’s value falls, causing money to flee to Hong Kong.
Shift to Centrist Ideology: American democracy and capitalism, being “100-year-old seniors,” are due for “disposal,” and “Centrist Ideology” will lead the world.

Executive Insight
This lecture by Huh Kyung Young offers a provocative critique of contemporary politics, both domestic and international, framed within a unique blend of political analysis, physiognomy, and self-proclaimed divine prophecy. For a thoughtful professional, the key takeaway lies in understanding the speaker’s distinct worldview: a rejection of established political ideologies (nationalism, radicalism, conservatism) and a strong assertion of his “Centrist Ideology” as the sole path to national and global salvation. The lecture’s emphasis on “sincerity” and “freshness” in leadership, coupled with a dire warning about the consequences of current political trajectories, underscores a deep dissatisfaction with the status quo. Professionals should note the strategic use of accessible metaphors and personal anecdotes to convey complex ideas, aiming to resonate with a broad audience seeking alternative solutions to societal challenges.

Huh Kyung Young’s Philosophical and Strategic Insights on Global Politics and Leadership

국수주의 (國粹主義): [National Conservatism (Ethno-nationalism, Protectionism, Cultural Preservationism)]
급진주의 (急進主義): [Radical Progressivism (Revolutionary Ideology, Extreme Liberalism, Systemic Overhaul)]
사대주의 (事大主義): [Subservient Diplomacy (Clientelism, Deferential Foreign Policy, Hegemonic Alignment)]
보수주의 (保守主義): [Traditional Conservatism (Status Quo Preservation, Orthodox Ideology, Gradualism)]
분파주의 (分派主義): [Factionalism (Sectarianism, Divisive Politics, Internal Schism)]
중산주의 (中産主義): [Centrist Ideology (Middle-Class Centricism, Balanced Governance, Equitable Distribution)]
간접 선거 (間接選擧): [Electoral College System (Indirect Election, Representative Voting, Delegated Mandate)]
직접 선거 (直接選擧): [Direct Suffrage (Popular Vote, Unmediated Election, Citizen Referendum)]
기도권 (旣得權): [Entrenched Interests (Vested Rights, Established Privileges, Incumbent Power)]
종이 호랑이 (종이 虎狼이): [Paper Tiger (Symbolic Threat, Powerless Entity, Ostensible Force)]
사대주의 발상 (事大主義 發想): [Subservient Mindset (Colonial Mentality, Dependent Thinking, Imitative Approach)]
진태양 (眞太陽): [Terrestrial Sun (Physical Sun, Earthly Luminary, Life-Sustaining Star)]
본태양 (本太陽): [Primal Sun (Spiritual Sun, Cosmic Origin, Soul-Governing Energy)]
돌림병 (돌림病): [Pandemic (Epidemic, Contagious Disease, Widespread Illness)]
전업 사주 (轉業 四柱): [Career Transition Destiny (Occupational Mobility Fate, Adaptive Professional Path, Multi-Career Trajectory)]
평행 사주 (平行 四柱): [Consistent Career Destiny (Stable Professional Path, Singular Occupational Focus, Unchanging Vocation)]
국운 (國運): [National Destiny (Fate of the Nation, National Fortune, Geopolitical Trajectory)]
공전멸병 (空錢滅兵): [Emptying Wealth, Eliminating Soldiers (Strategic Depletion, Financial Annihilation, Military Disarmament)]
해인 시대 (海印時代): [Ocean Seal Era (Digital Age, Information Era, Era of Universal Knowledge)]
언어도단 (言語道斷): [Beyond Description (Inexpressible, Unspeakable, Incomprehensible Era)]
신언서판 (身言書判): [Body, Speech, Writing, Judgment (Holistic Competence, Comprehensive Leadership Qualities, All-Encompassing Virtue)]
오시 (午時): [Noon Hour (Midday, Zenith of Yang Energy, Peak Time)]
윤허 (允許): [Divine Mandate (Heavenly Approval, Sanctioned Authority, Cosmic Permission)]
공전멸병 (空錢滅兵): [Emptying Wealth, Eliminating Soldiers (Strategic Depletion, Financial Annihilation, Military Disarmament)]
융합 (融合): [Fusion (Integration, Amalgamation, Synthesis)]
통합 (統合): [Unification (Consolidation, Harmonization, Cohesion)]
화합 (和合): [Harmony (Concord, Reconciliation, Synergy)]
연합 (聯合): [Alliance (Coalition, Federation, Association)]
집합 (集合): [Assembly (Gathering, Collective, Aggregation)]
결합 (結合): [Combination (Bonding, Connection, Union)]
혼합 (混合): [Mixture (Blend, Composite, Admixture)]
용해 (溶解): [Dissolution (Melting, Liquefaction, Solvation)]
발효 (醱酵): [Fermentation (Catalysis, Biological Transformation, Enzymatic Process)]
양보 (讓步): [Concession (Compromise, Yielding, Accommodation)]
소통 (疏通): [Communication (Dialogue, Interaction, Exchange)]
무국경 (無國境): [Borderless (Global, Transnational, Universal)]
무차별 (無差別): [Non-discriminatory (Impartial, Undifferentiated, Equitable)]
무정파 (無政派): [Non-partisan (Apolitical, Independent, Unaffiliated)]
기축 통화 (基軸通貨): [Reserve Currency (Anchor Currency, Global Standard, Dominant Medium of Exchange)]

The Truth of Huh Kyung-young’s Jung San Ju Ui

1. The Peril of Radicalism and the Essence of American Politics
   Huh Kyung-young discusses the potential presidential candidates in the United States, highlighting the problematic nature of their policies. He asserts that while Hillary Clinton’s policies generally possess a sense of tradition, Bernie Sanders’ radicalism poses a significant threat to the United States. Sanders’ progressive ideology, which advocates for the dismantling of Wall Street and large banks, is seen as pushing the Democratic Party further left than even China’s communist system. This, according to Huh Kyung-young, would lead to a mass exodus of American capital to places like Hong Kong, ultimately allowing China to dominate the global economy. He emphasizes that America’s current standing is maintained by policies akin to Hillary Clinton’s nationalism (국수주의), which prioritizes national interests. If Sanders’ policies were implemented, the United States would effectively relinquish its global leadership, transforming into a mere paper tiger and causing the value of the U.S. dollar to plummet, leading to economic collapse.

Huh Kyung-young also delves into the unique indirect electoral system of the United States, contrasting it with South Korea’s direct election system. He points out that America’s system, where 300 million citizens elect 538 electors who then choose the president, is reminiscent of South Korea’s past electoral college system under President Park Chung-hee. This indirect system, he explains, is largely controlled by conservative forces, including capitalists, financiers, and military industrialists, who historically ensured that a white president would maintain America’s power structure. He cites the example of Barack Obama, whose biracial heritage allowed him to overcome this barrier, but stresses that the system is fundamentally designed to prevent African Americans from becoming president. This intricate system means that even if a candidate like Sanders garners widespread popular support, they may not win the presidency if the electors, who are predominantly conservative, do not vote for them.

2. The Dynamics of Political Personalities and the Concept of “Jeon Eop Sa Ju”
   Huh Kyung-young critiques the political landscape by analyzing the “Sa Ju” (사주), or destiny, of various political figures, particularly focusing on the concept of “Jeon Eop Sa Ju” (전업사주), which describes individuals whose careers involve frequent changes. He contrasts this with “Pyeong Haeng Sa Ju” (평행사주), where individuals maintain a consistent career path. Bernie Sanders, despite his radical policies, is characterized as having a “Pyeong Haeng Sa Ju,” having dedicated 30 years to politics. In contrast, Ahn Cheol-soo is identified with “Jeon Eop Sa Ju,” having transitioned from a doctor to a CEO, then a professor, and finally a politician. Huh Kyung-young suggests that while some with “Jeon Eop Sa Ju” ascend with each career change, others decline. He places Ahn Cheol-soo in the latter category, asserting that his popularity diminishes with each career shift, symbolized by the repeated phrase “Cheol-soo, Cheol-soo, Cheol-soo” (철수, 철수, 철수), meaning “withdrawal.”

To illustrate the ascending “Jeon Eop Sa Ju,” Huh Kyung-young references Shin Young-kyun, who successfully transitioned from a dentist to an actor, then a businessman, and finally a politician and broadcaster, with each change leading to greater success. He emphasizes that understanding these “Sa Ju” patterns is crucial for discerning a leader’s potential impact on the nation. A leader with a declining “Jeon Eop Sa Ju” could lead the nation into decline, whereas one with an ascending “Jeon Eop Sa Ju” could foster national prosperity. He laments that South Korea has rarely elected leaders who elevate the nation, with Park Chung-hee being a notable exception. He also criticizes the fluidity of career paths into politics in South Korea, where individuals from diverse professions, such as lawyers, prosecutors, or even former activists, can easily become National Assembly members, which he views as problematic.

3. The Significance of “Jin Jeong Seong” and the Power of “Bon Tae Yang”
   Huh Kyung-young emphasizes the critical importance of “Jin Jeong Seong” (진정성), or sincerity, in political leadership. He asserts that a true leader must not deceive, lie to, or cause distress to the public. While acknowledging Bernie Sanders’ “Jin Jeong Seong” and “Cham Shin Seong” (참신성), or freshness, which appeals to younger generations despite his age, Huh Kyung-young points out that Sanders’ policies are too radical and left-leaning for the American context. He contrasts this with Hillary Clinton’s “Dang Dol Seong” (당돌성), or assertiveness, and “Jin Sil Seong” (진실성), or truthfulness, which, while strengths, can also be perceived negatively by the public. The American presidential election, he suggests, is a battle between these contrasting qualities.

Beyond political analysis, Huh Kyung-young delves into profound spiritual and cosmic concepts. He introduces the idea of “Jin Tae Yang” (진태양), the true sun, which governs the life of plants and humans, and “Bon Tae Yang” (본태양), the original sun, which controls human souls. He claims to possess an energy akin to “Bon Tae Yang,” an energy unmatched by anyone else in the universe. He states that his arrival coincides with a critical period of Earth’s orbital adjustment, a time when a great plague will strike. He asserts that those who call his name will be saved, while others will face dire consequences. He clarifies that his purpose is not merely to lecture but to guide humanity to call his name, offering lectures as a means to engage people and demonstrate that he is not of this Earth. He believes his teachings, recorded on platforms like YouTube, will serve as a permanent guide for humanity.

4. The Prophetic Era of “Hae In Si Dae” and the “Eon Eo Do Dan”
   Huh Kyung-young describes the current era as “Hae In Si Dae” (해인시대), the era of the sea seal, which he interprets as the internet age, characterized by an abundance of information and digital connectivity. This era is also referred to as “Eon Eo Do Dan” (언어도단), a time when words, scriptures, and truth no longer hold sway. He illustrates this with contemporary social phenomena, such as women smoking openly in public, which he views as a sign of societal decay and a departure from traditional norms. He also points to the prevalence of flying machines and satellites as indicators of this “Eon Eo Do Dan” era.

He further explains that this era will see the emergence of a leader possessing “Shin Eon Seo Pan” (신언서판), meaning excellent appearance, eloquent speech, skilled writing, and superior judgment. Huh Kyung-young claims to embody these qualities, noting that his policies, formulated 30 years ago, are now being imitated by other politicians, with the exception of his proposal to give 100 million won for marriage. He asserts that he can lecture in both English and Chinese characters, demonstrating his linguistic prowess. He also connects his identity to ancient prophecies, stating that he is the one who brings the “O Si” (오시) or “Sa Si Gong Yak” (사시공약) — the midday meal, symbolizing the strongest energy of the sun — which is the time when kings and figures like Sakyamuni Buddha traditionally ate. He interprets the character “Heo” (허) in his name as signifying “permission” or “authorization” from heaven, indicating his divinely sanctioned authority. He prophesies that he will appear like a lightning bolt when he becomes president, overwhelming the public with his popularity, and that his power is such that he can even eliminate those who defy him.

5. The Perils of Modern Diet and the Illusion of Wealth
   Huh Kyung-young critiques the modern diet, particularly American eating habits, as detrimental to health and national well-being. He asserts that American food culture, characterized by items like bread, fried pork (bacon), and hamburgers, is a primary source of carcinogens and unhealthy fats. He specifically mentions trans fats found in popcorn, consumed in large quantities at cinemas, as a major contributor to blocked blood vessels, leading to health issues like infertility in both men and women. He expresses dismay at the lack of action from South Korean educational and governmental bodies in addressing these harmful dietary influences, which he believes are propagated globally by American corporations like Coca-Cola. He warns that blindly imitating American culture, especially its food, will lead to severe health problems for the South Korean populace.

He also challenges the perception of wealth in modern society, particularly in South Korea. He argues that the current economic system, orchestrated by politicians, has led to a situation where 1% of the elite control 99% of the nation’s wealth, mirroring the situation in the United States. He states that most middle-class citizens, despite owning assets like homes, are effectively indebted to banks, with a significant portion of bank ownership being foreign. This means that what appears to be personal wealth is often merely a facade, with real assets being offset by debt. He warns that this economic structure is collapsing the middle class, leaving many with no real inheritance to pass on to their children. He paints a bleak picture of the future, where South Korean descendants might be forced into subservient roles for people from North Korea, China, or Taiwan, emphasizing the urgent need for change.

6. The Era of Integration and the Limitations of Existing Ideologies
   Huh Kyung-young emphasizes that the current era is one of “Tong Hap” (통합), “Yung Hap” (융합), and “Hwa Hap” (화합) – integration, convergence, and harmony. He criticizes politicians who promote conflict and division, such as those who clench their fists and declare they will “fight,” arguing that true leaders should foster unity. He points out that while such confrontational rhetoric might suit a left-wing politician like Bernie Sanders, it is inappropriate for someone like Ahn Cheol-soo, who seeks to align with conservative parties. He asserts that the true enemy of any individual is oneself, and a leader should focus on their own policies rather than engaging in partisan battles. He highlights that his own policies, including the proposal to adjust the time zone, have been adopted by both North and South Korea, demonstrating their universal appeal.

He further elaborates on the concepts of “Tong Hap,” “Yung Hap,” and “Hwa Hap.” “Tong Hap” involves “Yeon Hap” (연합), “Jip Hap” (집합), and “Gyeol Hap” (결합) – alliance, assembly, and combination. “Yung Hap” encompasses “Hon Hap” (혼합), “Yong Hae” (용해), and “Bal Hyo” (발효) – mixing, melting, and fermentation, illustrating how different elements can merge to create something new, whether in cooking, metallurgy, or medicine. “Hwa Hap” is characterized by “Yang Bo” (양보), “So Tong” (소통), and “Bak” (박) – concession, communication, and broad-mindedness. He argues that in this era of integration, convergence, and harmony, politicians who resort to confrontational tactics are out of touch and only serve to alienate the public. He concludes by stating that the existing ideologies of American democracy and capitalism, now a century old, are outdated and have led to extreme wealth disparity, making them ripe for replacement by his “Jung San Ju Ui” (중산주의), or middle-class ideology, which he believes will unify the world.

The Truth of Hillary’s Nationalism, Sanders’ Radicalism, Ahn Cheol-soo’s Sadaejuui, Kim Moo-sung’s Conservatism, Moon Jae-in’s Factionalism, and Huh kyung young’s Jung San Juui

1. An Analysis of Global Political Figures and Their Policies
   Huh kyung young begins by discussing potential presidential candidates in the United States and the inherent problems within the policies of global politicians. He then shifts to the global political landscape, particularly as Korea enters the “Byeongsinnyeon” (병신년) year. Hillary Clinton’s policies are characterized by their “Inri” (인리), a term that suggests a focus on traditional American values and national interest, often referred to as Nationalism (국수주의). This approach is seen as maintaining the legitimacy and established order of the United States. In contrast, Bernie Sanders’ policies are described as Radicalism (급진주의), which Huh kyung young views as problematic. Sanders’ proposals, such as dismantling Wall Street and large banks, are perceived as pushing the U.S. further left than even China, potentially leading to a mass exodus of capital to places like Hong Kong and allowing China to dominate the global economy. Such actions, Huh kyung young asserts, would signify America’s abandonment of its vested interests and global leadership.

2. The American Electoral System and the Influence of Indirect Voting
   Huh kyung young explains the unique nature of the American presidential election system, which employs indirect elections (간접 선거), contrasting it with Korea’s direct election system. He posits that Korea’s democratic process is, in this regard, a century ahead of the U.S. The American system, reminiscent of Korea’s past “Unified National Representatives” (통일주체 대의원) under President Park Chung-hee, involves the election of 538 electors. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency. Huh kyung young recounts an instance where two candidates, Bush and Gore, received an equal number of electoral votes (269 each), despite Gore having millions more popular votes. This illustrates that popular support, as seen with Sanders’ rising popularity, does not guarantee victory in the U.S. The electoral college, largely composed of conservative forces, including capitalists, financiers, and defense industrialists, is designed to protect American interests. Historically, this system was established to prevent a Black president, with electors predominantly being white. However, Barack Obama, despite being Black, was able to win due to his white mother, allowing him to garner both Black and white votes. Huh kyung young emphasizes that the electoral college system makes it nearly impossible for a Black candidate to become president, as the electors are predominantly white. He reiterates that regardless of Sanders’ popular appeal, the electoral college ultimately determines the outcome, and these electors are unlikely to support Sanders’ radical policies, which include dismantling Wall Street and potentially causing the U.S. dollar to depreciate, leading to economic collapse.

3. Critiques of Korean Political Figures and Their Policies
   Huh kyung young extends his critique to Korean political figures, beginning with Ahn Cheol-soo, whose statement about resembling Sanders is labeled as Sadaejuui (사대주의), meaning “serving the great” or subservience to a foreign power. This is seen as a dangerous mindset that could lead to the devaluation of the U.S. dollar and the abandonment of America’s global leadership. Huh kyung young contrasts this with his own policies, which he claims do not advocate for dismantling Wall Street or large banks but rather aim to create a society where the wealthy are respected through proper wealth distribution, not confiscation. He criticizes Ahn Cheol-soo for merely imitating his own proposals, such as reducing the number of National Assembly members to 100, a policy Huh kyung young claims to have advocated for 25 years prior. Ahn Cheol-soo’s actions are also seen as contributing to Factionalism (분파주의) within the opposition party, weakening its overall position. Huh kyung young dismisses Ahn Cheol-soo, a member of the top 1% wealthy elite, as an unsuitable representative for the working class and common people.

Next, Huh kyung young addresses Kim Moo-sung, the leader of the Saenuri Party, whose Conservatism (보수주의) is deemed overly complacent. Kim Moo-sung’s suggestion to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to boost the birth rate is criticized as an inadequate solution to the declining population and low marriage rates, which Huh kyung young attributes to economic hardship. He argues that genuine solutions, like his proposals of 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage, are necessary.

Moon Jae-in is then characterized by Mimicry (표방주의) or Imitation (모방주의). Huh kyung young points out that Moon Jae-in’s proposal to expand senior welfare benefits to 70% of the elderly, offering 200,000 won, is a diluted version of his own long-standing policy of providing 700,000 won. He views this as a deceptive tactic to gain votes, arguing that 200,000 won is insufficient and that politicians should reduce their own salaries and privileges to genuinely support the elderly. Huh kyung young asserts that his own policies, funded by eliminating tax evasion through mandatory debit card usage, would generate trillions of won, allowing for substantial welfare provisions without financial strain. He accuses current politicians of corruption and misleading the public.

4. The Significance of Physiognomy and Destiny in Politics
   Huh kyung young delves into the concept of physiognomy (관상), or face reading, to predict the political fortunes of candidates. He describes Hillary Clinton as having a “Peacock Face” (공작상), characterized by excessive assertiveness and a lack of humility, which he believes makes her less appealing to the general public despite her perceived sincerity. Sanders, on the other hand, is described as having a “Long-necked Eagle Face” (목이 긴 독수리상), symbolizing America’s national bird, and possessing sincerity (진정성) and freshness (참신성), which attracts younger voters despite his age.

Ahn Cheol-soo is given a “Goat Face” (염소상) and a “Job-changing Fate” (전업 사주), meaning his destiny involves frequently changing professions. Huh kyung young contrasts this with Sanders’ “Parallel Fate” (평행 사주), where one maintains a single career path. He argues that while some with a “Job-changing Fate,” like the actor Shin Young-kyun, can ascend with each career change, Ahn Cheol-soo’s changes lead to a decline in popularity. This is likened to a goat, which thrives in one place, unlike an ox (Moon Jae-in’s “Ox Face” (소상)), which can adapt to various tasks. Huh kyung young suggests that a leader with a declining “Job-changing Fate” would lead the nation to decline. He criticizes Korean politicians for their varied and often incongruous career paths before entering politics, contrasting them with his own consistent political philosophy.

Huh kyung young emphasizes that while individual destinies are predetermined up to the present, the future can be changed through enlightenment and embracing his teachings. He warns that without such a change, Korea is headed towards a future where 1% of the elite control 99% of the wealth, mirroring the current situation in the U.S., leading to widespread debt and economic servitude for the majority. He asserts that the current political class is responsible for this bleak outlook, where future generations might be forced into subservient roles to other nations.

5. The Prophetic Arrival of Huh kyung young and the Era of Haein
   Huh kyung young asserts his unique position, claiming that his physiognomy cannot be compared to others. He refers to prophecies that speak of his arrival in the Haein Era (해인 시대), an age of the internet and digital information, characterized by “Eon-eo-do-dan” (언어도단), a time when traditional language, scriptures, and truth no longer resonate. This era is marked by societal changes like women smoking in public and the prevalence of flying machines and satellites. He states that prophecies describe a leader with “Shin-eon-seo-pan” (신언서판)—divine appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment—who will appear in this era. Huh kyung young claims to embody these qualities, noting that his policies, formulated 30 years ago, are now being imitated by other politicians, with the exception of his marriage and childbirth incentives.

He further connects his name, “Huh” (허), to ancient wisdom, explaining that the character “Huh” (허) is associated with “permission” (허락) and “authorization” (허가), signifying his divinely sanctioned authority. He also references the “O-si” (오시) (11 AM to 1 PM), the time when the sun’s energy is strongest, as the time when emperors and Buddha ate, and the time when he brings his message. He alludes to a prophecy of “Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong” (공전멸병), which he interprets as an encrypted message to “empty the Kim (김) surname” (김씨를 비워라), leaving only “Huh” (허) as the true leader. This, he explains, was a coded message to protect his lineage from past rulers.

6. The Dangers of Political Division and the Need for Unity
   Huh kyung young criticizes the current political climate, particularly the actions of Ahn Cheol-soo, who he claims is imitating Sanders’ gesture of raising a fist, symbolizing a call to fight. Huh kyung young argues that in the Haein Era (해인 시대), which is characterized by integration (통합), convergence (융합), and harmony (화합), such confrontational gestures are inappropriate. He believes that politicians should be peacemakers, not instigators of conflict. He emphasizes that the true enemy is oneself, and leaders should present their policies consistently, without engaging in partisan battles. He points out that his own policies, such as adjusting the time zone, have been adopted by both North and South Korea, demonstrating their universal appeal. He laments that many politicians are academics with no real-world experience, leading to national problems.

He further elaborates on the three elements of integration: alliance (연합), assembly (집합), and combination (결합). For convergence, he lists mixing (혼합), dissolving (용해), and fermentation (발효). For harmony, he mentions concession (양보) and communication (소통). He argues that in an era demanding these qualities, politicians who clench their fists and advocate for conflict are detrimental to the nation.

7. Geopolitical Dynamics and the Rise of Jung San Juui
   Huh kyung young explains the geopolitical dynamics of the Korean Peninsula using the Five Elements theory. He states that the U.S. (목, Wood) is currently suppressing Korea (토, Earth), while China (금, Metal) is in a mutually beneficial relationship with Korea (금생토, Metal generates Earth). Japan (화, Fire) is seen as a helper (화생토, Fire generates Earth), as evidenced by the economic aid provided during President Park Chung-hee’s era. Russia (수, Water) is seen as being subservient to Korea (수극화, Water overcomes Fire, but in this context, Korea is seen as overcoming Russia). He emphasizes that understanding U.S. politics is crucial because America’s influence directly impacts Korea.

He warns that a Hillary Clinton presidency, characterized by hegemonism (패권주의), could lead to war on the Korean Peninsula. Conversely, a Sanders presidency, while popular, could weaken America’s global dominance and cause the U.S. dollar to depreciate, leading to economic collapse in both the U.S. and Korea as capital flees to Hong Kong. He concludes that Sanders’ radical policies, though popular, are not suitable for the U.S. given its role as the issuer of the world’s reserve currency.

Huh kyung young then introduces his own philosophy, Jung San Juui (중산주의), which he describes as borderless (무국경), indiscriminate (무차별), and non-partisan (무정파). He asserts that Jung San Juui is a new truth that will unify the world, transcending the outdated capitalism and democracy of the U.S., which he views as a “100-year-old elder” ready for retirement. He criticizes American capitalism for creating a system where 1% of the population controls 99% of the wealth, turning the majority into “beggars” enslaved by money. He points out that while Korea has a trade surplus with the U.S., it has a current account deficit due to the royalties paid to American companies for intellectual property and brands. He argues that the U.S. maintains its economic dominance through knowledge industries and patents, often utilizing global talent through scholarships. He concludes that while democracy and capitalism need to be reformed, Sanders’ approach is impractical for the U.S., and only Huh kyung young’s Jung San Juui can provide the necessary transformation.

The Truth of Huh Kyung young’s Centrist Ideology Amidst Global Political Currents

1. An Analysis of Global Political Figures and Their Policies
   I will discuss the potential presidential candidates in the United States and the issues inherent in the policies of global politicians. I will also address the global political landscape as we enter the year of Byeongsin (2016).

Hillary Clinton’s policies generally possess a certain legitimacy. The United States, as a nation, requires this legitimacy.

Bernie Sanders, who seeks to lead the U.S. in a more radical direction than China, presents a problem. While his rising popularity might suggest he is a viable candidate, his radicalism pulls the Democratic Party further to the left than even its traditional left wing, potentially making the U.S. more left-leaning than China.

The U.S. exists because of policies like Hillary Clinton’s, which embody nationalism. If Sanders were to implement policies such as abolishing Wall Street and dismantling large banks, American capital would flee to Hong Kong, allowing China to dominate the global economy. This would effectively dismantle Wall Street, turning the U.S. into a communist state and China into a democracy. This is akin to the U.S. relinquishing its vested interests.

The U.S. elects its president through an indirect electoral system. In contrast, South Korea uses a direct election system, which means our democracy is arguably a century ahead of the U.S. The U.S. currently employs a system similar to the Unification National Conference delegates used during President Park Chung-hee’s era.

In the U.S., 300 million people elect 538 electors. To win the presidency, a candidate needs 270 electoral votes. In a past election, George W. Bush and Al Gore each received 269 electoral votes, a tie. Gore, however, had millions more popular votes.

Therefore, even if Sanders receives double the popular votes compared to Hillary, his higher approval rating among the 300 million people does not guarantee more electoral votes. The electors must vote for Sanders. These electors are predominantly conservative forces, representing American capitalists, financiers, and military industrialists. They established the indirect election system to prevent a Black president from being elected, ensuring that the electors were all white to protect the nation. However, Barack Obama, despite being Black, had a white mother, which allowed him to become president. Otherwise, a Black person would typically be unable to become president in the U.S. due to the all-white electoral college.

The U.S. has maintained this indirect election system since ancient times, where 300 million people elect 538 electors, who then elect the president. The key is to secure the support of these electors. Even if Sanders gains immense popularity and receives many popular votes, unlike in South Korea where popularity can lead to the presidency, he cannot become president in the U.S.

His proposal to dismantle Wall Street would cause all American capital to flee to Hong Kong in pursuit of profit, leaving the U.S. a paper tiger. This would devalue the U.S. dollar, leading to economic collapse. Sanders’ policies, intended to help the common people, would undermine Hillary Clinton’s nationalism and the very foundation of the U.S.

Ahn Cheol-soo’s statement that he resembles Sanders, despite the U.S. not being a simple nation, is an act of sycophancy.

2. The Significance of the Byeongsin Year and the Arrival of the True Sun
   As the Byeongsin year approaches, your applause should also ignite. This fire is the True Sun (Jin Tae Yang). The True Sun governs the lives of plants and humans, while I, Huh Kyung young, am the Original Sun (Bon Tae Yang), as described in the Cheonbukyung. The Original Sun controls the souls of humans.

Even among the 7 billion people on Earth and countless beings in the universe, no one possesses energy akin to mine. Everyone else is my opposite. When you call my name or see my picture, your hands cannot be detached, a phenomenon verifiable by machines. This immense energy flows, and you cannot live without the energy of the True Sun.

The Original Sun has appeared at a time when the Earth’s orbit is undergoing correction, a period when the energy of the True Sun and the Original Sun align. Therefore, when a great plague strikes, there will be a stark difference between those who called my name and those who did not.

I am not here merely to lecture. I have come from heaven to tell you to call my name. However, you would not listen if I simply told you to call my name, so I give these lectures. My lectures should serve as proof that I am not from this Earth. I will leave thousands of these records on YouTube, so humanity can always watch my economic lectures even after I am gone.

I recently received a call from someone who almost fell while hiking after watching my YouTube channel. They said they would have fallen if they had been watching another channel. They were watching my 110th lecture while sitting on the mountain. Many people watch my YouTube videos.

3. Critiques of Korean Political Leaders and American Influence
   In South Korea, which has a direct election system, it is inappropriate for presidential candidates to imitate American candidates. Our nation is the center of the world.

Korean garlic cannot thrive in the U.S., and ginseng planted there yields radishes because the soil is unsuitable. Americans consume unhealthy foods, and we have suffered greatly due to their poor dietary habits. Eating bread, for instance, is not good for you. They also eat fried pork, known as bacon, which is a primary carcinogen. Hamburgers are also a major source of carcinogens. While Korean hamburgers might be better, Americans tend to choose unhealthy options. For example, a large bag of popcorn, often consumed by two people at the movies, contains 20 servings of trans fats, which clog blood vessels. This leads to health problems, including infertility in both men and women.

I question what the Ministry of Education and other government officials are doing. Americans consume Coca-Cola and other unhealthy foods, exporting this poor food culture worldwide. Their diet, including Coca-Cola, bacon, and hamburgers, is detrimental to Koreans. Therefore, our people should not blindly emulate the U.S.

Ahn Cheol-soo’s radicalism would devalue the U.S. dollar and cause America to relinquish its global leadership. While his actions might seem beneficial to some, my policies are different. I do not advocate dismantling Wall Street or abolishing large banks. Instead, I aim to create a society where the wealthy are respected by ensuring proper distribution to those in need, rather than simply seizing wealth.

Sanders proposes a wealth tax, but the wealthy already pay substantial taxes. The problem lies in politicians reducing these taxes. If taxes were collected properly without reductions, there would be no issue. Ahn Cheol-soo’s sycophancy towards the wealthy is disheartening.

When I proposed reducing the number of National Assembly members to 100, Ahn Cheol-soo later echoed this idea. I have been involved in politics for 30 years, having spoken about this 25 years ago, whereas he is relatively new to politics and merely imitates others.

Ahn Cheol-soo’s factionalism is also problematic. A party leader should unite, not create divisions, which has put the opposition party at a disadvantage. Can you trust such factionalists and sycophants to reform politics?

Ahn Cheol-soo represents the top 1% of the elite. What is the point of him raising his fist when it should be the workers and common people doing so? It is absurd for someone with over 200 billion won in assets to claim to represent the people, especially when many cannot afford rent or electricity. Our citizens are not easily deceived.

Kim Moo-sung, the Saenuri Party leader, represents conservatism. His suggestion to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to increase the birth rate due to declining population is misguided. I do not criticize individuals, but their policies. While Ahn Cheol-soo and Kim Moo-sung may appear kind, their policies merely imitate mine. If they are to follow my birth rate policy, they should offer 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage.

The only policy that both ruling and opposition parties have not yet imitated is my proposal to give 100 million won for marriage. This will happen when I become president, as it will cause a nationwide sensation. They continue to imitate my policies, but they do not do so properly.

Moon Jae-in’s approach is one of imitation. When I proposed elderly allowances, he suggested giving 200,000 won to 70% of the elderly, while President Park Geun-hye was giving it to 20%. Is 200,000 won truly helpful? This is merely playing with the elderly. They should return their National Assembly salaries and vested interests to provide proper support. I have advocated for 700,000 won for the elderly for 20 to 25 years. What is 200,000 won? They secretly raise their own salaries in the National Assembly while deceiving the public with insufficient aid. If they want to provide real help, they should do so properly, otherwise, they should not. They only offer elderly allowances to gain votes, only to reduce it to 20% after the election.

When I become president, I will not act this way. To increase the budget by 100 trillion won, which is not much for elderly allowances, I would mandate the use of debit cards, like in the U.S. All transactions would be recorded, preventing tax evasion. This would bring in about 100 trillion won in taxes annually, leaving 200 trillion won even after providing 700,000 won to the elderly. This shows how much theft is occurring. How can a bus company president earn 40 to 50 million won annually? Their subordinates do all the work. We know what they are doing. Stop deceiving the public.

Hillary Clinton, Ahn Cheol-soo, Moon Jae-in, and Kim Moo-sung are all imitators. They merely copy my ideas. If they are going to imitate, they should do it properly. They are all “copycats.”

4. Physiognomy and Political Fortunes
   Hillary Clinton’s physiognomy is like that of a peacock. Peacocks are too bold, which is a negative trait for her. Women should be a bit shy, but she is too audacious. She also appears truthful, which is both a strength and a weakness. Her boldness and perceived truthfulness cause her to lose ground to Sanders among the public, who prefer a softer demeanor.

Sanders’ physiognomy is like a long-necked eagle, a scavenger eagle that preys on carrion. The eagle is a symbol of the U.S., aligning with Sanders. Sanders’ strength lies in his sincerity. When he speaks, people believe he will follow through. Similarly, when I present my policies, people are enthusiastic because they believe I will execute them 100%, even if it means taking money from the U.S. or China. This is sincerity. Sanders also possesses sincerity.

Another of Sanders’ traits is his freshness. Despite being over 75, he appears fresh, which attracts young people. The American presidential election is a battle between Hillary’s boldness and truthfulness versus Sanders’ freshness and sincerity.

I will now compare these individuals to my centrist ideology. The U.S. is not the Soviet Union, but Sanders seeks to transform it into one. While Sanders is an effective speaker, his ideas are not entirely suited to American reality, which will likely cause problems.

Kim Moo-sung’s proposals, such as bringing in ethnic Koreans from China to increase the population and suggesting that the Saenuri Party’s key to winning the next election is to discourage middle-class voting, are too complacent. It is not a good idea to bring in ethnic Koreans to boost the birth rate when our own people cannot afford to marry due to lack of money.

Now, regarding Ahn Cheol-soo, he was born with a “career-changing” fate. Shin Young-kyun also had this fate. Sanders, however, has a “parallel” fate, meaning he stays in the same profession. Sanders has been involved in politics for 30 years, moving from mayor to representative to senator to presidential candidate. Ahn Cheol-soo, on the other hand, constantly changes professions: doctor, CEO, professor, and then politician.

People with a “parallel” fate stick to one career, while those with a “career-changing” fate switch professions. Some ascend with each change, while others decline. Ahn Cheol-soo’s popularity decreases with each career change, going from 50% to 0%. Sanders, however, moved from being an independent to joining the Democratic Party, while Ahn Cheol-soo left the Democratic Party. They are opposites.

Shin Young-kyun, despite having a “career-changing” fate, ascended with each change. He was a successful dentist from Seoul National University, then became an actor, gaining even more popularity and wealth. If he had remained a dentist, he would have suffered. Similarly, a woman who constantly goes out would suffer if confined to home. Shin Young-kyun then became a successful businessman, earning immense wealth. After that, he became a politician, a National Assembly member, and then a broadcaster, even acquiring SBS. He then returned to being a businessman. Thus, he continuously ascended with each career change.

Conversely, Ahn Cheol-soo’s popularity declines with each change. We can discern whether a “career-changing” fate leads to ascent or decline. What would happen to the nation if such a person became president? The nation’s fortune would decline. Have you ever elected a leader who elevated the nation’s fortune? Only President Park Chung-hee, through the May 16th Revolution, did so. Other presidents have enriched themselves and their cronies, leaving the nation’s coffers empty, only for the next president to do the same, issuing foreign debt to refill them. This is the pattern of our presidents.

Unlike Sanders, who dedicates his life to politics regardless of financial gain, our politicians often switch from being lawyers, prosecutors, or even taxi drivers to National Assembly members. There are even cases of individuals who praised Kim Il-sung in Pyongyang becoming National Assembly members in the Democratic Party. Our National Assembly members are elected in strange ways.

Wake up before divine punishment strikes. I am watching everything. You might wonder what power I possess. With cosmic energy, I can eliminate anyone on any given day. I can also heal, but I can also eliminate. Eventually, presidents of nations that do not heed my words will quietly disappear. Only I possess such energy, but there is no need for it now. I will remain silent until I become president.

Shin Young-kyun’s “career-changing” fate is acceptable, but Ahn Cheol-soo’s is problematic. Why does he constantly create factions? Moon Jae-in’s refusal to hold a party convention is also Ahn Cheol-soo’s responsibility. It is his ability to rally supporters within the party to make it impossible for the leader to refuse. But if the leader does not listen, he leaves the party. Is it acceptable for a child to disown their father if they are unhappy? Ahn Cheol-soo himself created that party.

The most important quality for a politician, as with Sanders, is sincerity. They must not deceive, lie to, or cause distress to the public. However, Sanders’ policies are too radical and left-leaning.

I discuss physiognomy and fate because it attracts more viewers. In this human world, your destiny is predetermined by your physiognomy and fate. However, there is something crucial you must understand from this lecture. You cannot change your past up to the Byeongsin year (2016). Similarly, South Korea’s past cannot be changed.

But from today onwards, anyone has the special privilege to change their destiny through their own will. You cannot change the fact that you were not born with a silver spoon up to 2016. Those who quickly realize this will succeed. Therefore, you cannot change your spouse if you are unhappy with them up to 2016. So, there is no point in fighting over an unchangeable past.

Your past up to today is your karmic burden. Even if a truck hits you and severs your legs, it is your karma. Therefore, there is no need to resent the past. Humans, however, fall ill because of this unchangeable past.

What we need to understand is that from today onwards, your destiny is influenced by your karmic burden plus the enlightenment gained from my lectures. From next year, your destiny will depend on your mindset. This is extremely important. The Byeongsin year allows you to freely change your destiny. To do this, you must embrace my teachings. Those who do not will remain stuck in the past.

Currently, 300 National Assembly members cannot change our nation’s situation. But now, an opportunity to change it has arrived. Your mindset will determine South Korea’s future. If things continue as they are, the top 1% or 5% of the elite will possess 99% of the nation’s wealth. The U.S. is already in this state. In South Korea, the top 5% hold 90% of the wealth. Soon, most people will have no money after paying off bank debts. Even if they own a house, it belongs to the bank due to interest, which goes to foreign entities as 50% of banks are foreign-owned. So, if someone has assets, subtracting their debt often leaves them with zero. Many people are in this situation. Do not envy those who appear wealthy.

Banks have seized all wealth, and the middle class has largely collapsed. Many fathers, upon their death, find that their supposed inheritance is actually debt, leaving nothing for their children after repayment. This situation was created by politicians.

Should you continue to support such politicians? It is truly serious. Your children and grandchildren will end up serving people from North Korea, China, or Taiwan, cleaning their shoes and toilets to survive. The future of the Korean people is very bleak. That is why I am here in South Korea.

5. Physiognomy and Political Destinies of Korean Politicians
   While Ahn Cheol-soo, Shin Young-kyun, and Moon Jae-in all have good appearances, Kim Moo-sung’s physiognomy is like that of an imugi (a lesser dragon). Ahn Cheol-soo’s is like a goat. Sanders’ is like an eagle. Why would a goat claim to resemble an eagle?

Hillary Clinton’s physiognomy is like a peacock. She dresses like a peacock, always in neat, sophisticated, and dignified attire. Moon Jae-in’s physiognomy is like an ox. Kim Moo-sung’s is like an imugi. Yoo Seong-min’s physiognomy is like a rat. Their paths are predetermined. You can tell who will become president and who will not.

Yoo Seung-min is like a frog. Park Won-soon is like a dog, in the sense that he serves the citizens of Seoul. However, Park Won-soon’s true physiognomy is like a goat. That is why he gets along well with Ahn Cheol-soo, who also has a goat-like physiognomy. Ahn Cheol-soo conceded to Park Won-soon. Park Won-soon’s protruding mouth, similar to Ahn Cheol-soo’s, is a goat’s mouth, and his eyes and nose are also goat-like. Goats have horns, and they can be stubborn.

Is it good for goats or sheep to frequently change professions? No, it is not. While Shin Young-kyun’s “career-changing” fate was beneficial, Ahn Cheol-soo, as a goat, should not change professions. Moon Jae-in, as an ox, can change professions. He was a lawyer, then a chief of staff, then a party leader, and then a presidential candidate. An ox can pull carts, plow fields, and carry loads. But a sheep does not change. If Ahn Cheol-soo, a sheep, keeps changing professions, his fortune will decline. His “wool” will get dirty. A sheep stays in one place, following its owner on the grass. An ox, however, performs various roles, like a car or farm machinery.

So, while it is acceptable for some to change professions, it is not good for others. I have explained physiognomy to reveal who will become the U.S. president. I cannot openly discuss such things here due to legal issues.

My physiognomy is beyond comparison. It is written in prophecies. This is the Haein Era, the internet age, where seals are as numerous as the sea. It is an era of “unheard-of words” (eon-eo-do-dan), where words, scriptures, truth, and even the Way are incomprehensible. This is now, an era where women smoke in public. This is dangerous, as it can affect the health of future generations. The Haein Era is also a time when metal objects fly, meaning airplanes and satellites.

In this era of “unheard-of words,” a person with divine appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment will appear. My policies, created 30 years ago, are being imitated by others. They have copied everything except the 100 million won for marriage. I lecture in English and Chinese characters, demonstrating my eloquence. This person, possessing all these qualities, is me.

Buddha ate between 11 AM and 1 PM, which is the time of “Osi,” when the energy of the universe is strongest. Kings also eat their main meal at this time. I am the one who brings the message at this time of strong yang energy. I am also the one above the cross, like God, and above the ten directions of the world, like Buddha. I am the one who brings their words. The character “Heo” (Huh) means to receive permission or authorization. Therefore, I am the one who has received authority from heaven. My physiognomy cannot be compared to others.

I will appear like lightning when I become president, and my popularity will be overwhelming. When I ran for president previously, I was given only one TV debate at midnight. Despite this, my popularity soared. Even the Democratic Party officials discussed my candidacy, acknowledging that the election was mine. My popularity was immense.

I will transform this world. I have also explained the prophecy of “Gongjeon Myeolbyeong” (Empty Field, Destroy Soldiers). This means to eliminate the soldiers who wield metal spears for money, leaving the character “Kim” (gold). But it does not mean a person named Kim. It means to empty the “Kim” (gold), leaving only “Heo” (Huh). This was an encrypted message to protect me from kings who might have tried to kill me.

These politicians’ policies are worthless. Have you received my 33 policies? Please open them. If you have any questions, ask.

Yoo Seong-min’s physiognomy is like a wildcat. He scratches if he is displeased.

Why is physiognomy important? In foreign countries, and even in Korea, there are plates with sharp, knife-like protrusions. First Lady Yuk Young-soo used such a green plate for a year before she passed away. It resembles a gun barrel and a knife. I investigated the plates used by past presidential wives, and they all matched their fates. Those who went to prison used plates that reflected that fate, and those who passed away used plates that reflected that.

Looking at an unlucky person can bring bad luck. Therefore, even if a plate is luxurious, if it has sharp protrusions, it should not be used. Even a slightly chipped plate should not be used. A person’s fate is intertwined with such objects. You should change your husband’s, wife’s, and children’s bowls to good ones. The patterns should be auspicious. A plate with knife-like patterns, like a leaf, can be dangerous.

A person’s face is also like this. Looking at Ronald Reagan makes you smile. That is why he was the most beloved president in the U.S. Even after being shot, he joked about it. He had such composure, and his face was amusing.

This is the Haein Era, the digital age, which is one of the three major elements of unification: convergence, integration, and harmony. In this era, Sanders raised his fist. Who imitated him in Korea? Ahn Cheol-soo raised his fist and spoke about it ten times. I usually do not criticize Korean politicians, but I cannot bear to watch this.

This era of convergence, integration, and harmony requires unity, not fighting. But they raise their fists, wanting to fight. Who are they fighting? The common people. People who should be stopping conflicts are fighting in the National Assembly. This is acceptable for Sanders, as he is a leftist. But for Ahn Cheol-soo, who is potentially aligning with the Saenuri Party, raising his fist is not a good look.

In this era of convergence, integration, and harmony, raising a fist and fighting is inappropriate. Who is the true enemy of all humans? It is oneself. There is no enemy in this world other than oneself. I contend with my own policies, not with those of the ruling or opposition parties. I present my policies to the public, and they have never changed.

Among my policies from 25 years ago, I proposed changing the standard time to Seoul time and advancing it by 30 minutes. North Korea followed this last year. All my policies, except the difficult ones, have been imitated by both ruling and opposition parties. This particular policy is being followed by both North and South Korea.

In such an era, they raise their fists and declare they will fight. But our people believe them. When I appear later, you will be speechless. Politics is run by those with academic degrees, but they lack real-world experience. This is why South Korea faces problems.

The three elements of integration are alliance, aggregation, and combination. This is the era of integration in the 21st century. It is also the era of convergence. What is convergence? It is dissolution, mixture, and fermentation. Fermentation is used to make medicines, dissolution for machines (like mixing metals), and mixture for things like flour.

What is harmony? It is concession, communication, and openness. In this era of alliance, aggregation, combination, mixture, dissolution, fermentation, concession, communication, and openness, they raise their fists and declare they will fight. The public is fed up with politicians fighting in the National Assembly.

I have sung songs at various universities, but this is the first time I have received an instrument. I have seen instruments before, but never received one. Time has passed quickly.

Today’s discussion about politicians is not enjoyable. My other lectures are interesting, but politicians cause stress. I dislike even mentioning them. Of course, once I become president, you will rarely see them.

6. Geopolitical Dynamics and the Future of the Korean Peninsula
   While we cannot fight the U.S. due to its role in our security, it is crucial to understand why the U.S. presidential election matters to us. The U.S. is represented by wood, China by metal, Japan by fire, and we are earth. Wood suppresses earth, meaning the U.S. suppresses us. The U.S. dominates the Korean Peninsula.

If I, Huh Kyung young, were to come, the U.S. would not be able to suppress us. The Soviet Union is water, and we suppress water. So, the Soviet Union follows us. Therefore, do not be deceived by the Soviet Union and do not trust the U.S. Japan rises, and it has risen. Fire and earth help us. President Park Chung-hee brought 600 million dollars from Japan to revive our economy.

The U.S. suppresses us. North Korea, connected to the U.S. and South Korea, cannot act freely. With U.S. aircraft carriers present, North Korea’s thousands of nuclear weapons are meaningless. Currently, the U.S. suppresses the Korean Peninsula.

China, represented by metal, has a good relationship with us. Metal generates earth, so China helps us. This geopolitical dynamic is established.

The U.S. presidential election is critical. If Hillary Clinton becomes president, there could be war on the Korean Peninsula, as she is a hegemonist. If Sanders becomes president, U.S. hegemony will decline, and our economy will collapse. If the U.S. dollar devalues, our economy will also suffer. If Sanders becomes president, American and Korean capital will flee to Hong Kong. The flow of money determines whether a nation’s economy thrives or collapses. That is why I briefly discussed the U.S. presidential election today.

Such radicalism could endanger the U.S. However, it is popular. My centrist ideology, however, is borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan. It cannot be compared to these others. My centrist ideology contains a truth that will eventually unify the world, making it incomparable to these concepts.

American democracy and capitalism are now 100 years old, like a 100-year-old person. It is time for them to be discarded. My centrist ideology will now lead the world. Their systems have created a situation where the top 1% of the elite in the U.S. possess 99% of the wealth. This means most Americans are impoverished, enslaved by money. Those who work hard find their earnings taken by the wealthy.

What do we give the U.S. the most? Our trade balance with the U.S. is in surplus, but our current account balance is in deficit. Why? The U.S. receives a lot of royalties from us. All hamburgers, like McDonald’s, are American. When we drink Coca-Cola, the U.S. collects royalties. The U.S. receives money from over 200 countries worldwide. They offer scholarships to talented individuals globally, turning them into Americans, and then use them to obtain patents for American technology, collecting money from their home countries.

The U.S. also dominates the global economy through its knowledge industry. American universities hold many patents. What do our universities do? Our education system is flawed. As Sanders suggests, it is time for democracy and capitalism to be reformed into centrist ideology, but Sanders cannot achieve this. The U.S. cannot abandon nationalism because it is the issuer of the world’s reserve currency. It is difficult for the U.S. to implement reforms like South Korea.

I gave this lecture today, on the Lunar New Year, because people need to see it. You should quickly eat and return home during the holiday.

20160206_1012_PresidentialCandidates_CritiqueOfGlobalAndDomesticPolitics

Critique of Global and Domestic Politics: Presidential Candidates and the Truth of Huh Kyung young’s Centrist Ideology

Date: 2016.02.06

Keywords: Presidential Candidates, Global Politics, Domestic Politics, Centrist Ideology, Huh Kyung young

Content

Analysis of U.S. Presidential Candidates: Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders
The lecture begins by discussing potential U.S. presidential candidates, specifically Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, and critically examining their policies. Hillary Clinton’s platform is characterized by a form of nationalism, which is seen as essential for maintaining America’s traditional identity and global standing. This “nationalism” is presented as the foundation upon which the United States exists. In contrast, Bernie Sanders’s policies are described as radical, aiming to dismantle Wall Street and large banks. Such radical policies, if implemented, would cause American capital to flee to places like Hong Kong, potentially allowing China to dominate the global economy. This would effectively transform the U.S. into a “paper tiger” and lead to a decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, ultimately collapsing the American economy. The speaker argues that Sanders’s radicalism, which seeks to aid the common people, would inadvertently undermine the very nationalistic principles that sustain the U.S.

The U.S. electoral system is highlighted as a crucial factor. Unlike South Korea, which uses direct elections, the U.S. employs an indirect electoral system where citizens vote for electors who then choose the president. This system, reminiscent of South Korea’s past “National Conference for Unification” under President Park Chung-hee, involves 538 electors. To win the presidency, a candidate needs 270 electoral votes. The speaker notes that historically, candidates like Al Gore, despite winning the popular vote by millions, lost the election due to the electoral college system. This system is largely controlled by conservative forces, including capitalists, financiers, and military industrialists, who prioritize maintaining the existing power structure. They established the indirect election system to prevent a Black president, though Barack Obama, with his white mother, was an exception. This structure ensures that even if a candidate like Sanders gains immense popular support, they cannot become president without the backing of the electoral college.

Critique of Domestic Political Figures: Ahn Cheol-soo, Kim Moo-sung, and Moon Jae-in
The lecture then shifts to a critique of South Korean political figures, labeling them as “imitators” of Huh Kyung young’s policies. Ahn Cheol-soo is criticized for his “sadaejuui” (servile diplomacy or sycophancy), particularly for likening himself to Bernie Sanders. This is seen as problematic because Sanders’s policies would weaken the U.S. dollar and its global leadership, a stance that Huh Kyung young explicitly rejects. Huh Kyung young’s centrist ideology, in contrast, does not advocate for dismantling Wall Street or large banks but rather for creating a society where the wealthy are respected and wealth is properly distributed, without simply seizing assets. Ahn Cheol-soo is also criticized for adopting Huh Kyung young’s proposal to reduce the number of National Assembly members to 100, a policy Huh Kyung young claims to have advocated for 25 years prior. Furthermore, Ahn Cheol-soo is seen as a figure representing the top 1% of society, making his calls for workers and common people to “clench their fists” (a gesture of defiance) hypocritical given his immense wealth.

Kim Moo-sung, the leader of the Saenuri Party, is criticized for his conservative policies, particularly his suggestion to bring in ethnic Koreans from China to boost the birth rate. This is deemed an inadequate solution, as the fundamental issue is that young Koreans cannot afford to marry due to financial hardship. Huh Kyung young’s proposed solutions, such as providing 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage, are presented as the proper way to address these issues, which other politicians have yet to fully adopt. Moon Jae-in is labeled a “mimic” or “copycat” for his policy proposals, such as expanding senior welfare benefits to 70% of the elderly, offering 200,000 won per month. Huh Kyung young argues that this is merely a superficial attempt to gain votes, as 200,000 won is insufficient, and he has consistently advocated for 700,000 won for seniors for over two decades. He also criticizes politicians for secretly raising their own salaries while offering meager benefits to the public, calling it a deception. Huh Kyung young proposes implementing a mandatory debit card system, similar to the U.S., to prevent tax evasion and generate an additional 100 trillion won in tax revenue annually, which would easily fund his welfare policies and still leave a surplus.

Physiognomy and Destiny: Presidential Candidates’ “Animal Faces”
The lecture delves into physiognomy, assigning “animal faces” to various political figures to illustrate their character and destiny. Hillary Clinton is described as having a “peacock face,” characterized by excessive boldness and confidence, which is seen as both a strength and a weakness, making her less appealing to the general public. Her perceived truthfulness is also noted as a double-edged sword. Bernie Sanders is given a “long-necked eagle face,” symbolizing his connection to the American national symbol. His strengths are his sincerity and freshness, making him popular among younger generations despite his age. This sincerity makes people believe he will fulfill his promises.

Ahn Cheol-soo is said to have a “goat face” and a “career-changing destiny” (전업 사주), meaning he frequently changes professions. While some with this destiny ascend with each change, Ahn Cheol-soo is depicted as declining in popularity with each shift, moving from doctor to CEO, professor, and then politician. This contrasts with Shin Young-kyun, who also had a “career-changing destiny” but consistently rose in success, moving from dentist to actor, businessman, and politician. Moon Jae-in is characterized by a “cow face,” which is suitable for a “career-changing destiny” as a cow can perform various tasks like plowing fields or pulling carts. However, a “goat face” like Ahn Cheol-soo’s is not suited for frequent career changes, leading to a decline. Kim Moo-sung is described as having an “immugi face” (a mythical serpent that has not yet become a dragon), and Yoo Seung-min is given a “rat face” or “cat face.” Park Won-soon is also identified with a “goat face,” explaining his affinity with Ahn Cheol-soo. The speaker emphasizes that observing these “animal faces” reveals their predetermined paths and suitability for leadership. Even inanimate objects like dishes can influence destiny; for example, a dish resembling a gun barrel or knife, used by former First Lady Yuk Young-soo, is linked to her tragic fate.

The Era of Change and Huh Kyung young’s Role
The year 2016 is presented as a pivotal moment where individuals can change their destiny. While the past cannot be altered, the present offers an opportunity for transformation through enlightenment and embracing Huh Kyung young’s teachings. The speaker asserts that the future of South Korea depends on the collective mindset of its citizens. He warns that the current political system, dominated by a small elite, has led to a situation where 1% of the population controls 99% of the wealth, mirroring the U.S. This has resulted in the collapse of the middle class and widespread debt, making people “slaves to money.”

Huh Kyung young positions himself as a divine figure sent from heaven to rectify these issues. He claims to possess cosmic energy, capable of healing and even eliminating those who defy him. He states that he is not merely a lecturer but a messenger sent to guide humanity. His policies, developed over 30 years, are described as unique and transformative, such as adjusting Korea’s standard time, which North Korea later adopted. He criticizes contemporary politicians for their “imitation” of his policies, particularly their failure to adopt his proposal of 100 million won for marriage. The current era is characterized as the “Haein Era” (Seal of the Sea Era), an internet age where traditional values and truths are lost (“eon-eo-do-dan” – a state where words and doctrines are meaningless). In this era, a leader possessing “shin-eon-seo-pan” (divine appearance, eloquent speech, excellent writing, and superior judgment) is prophesied to appear. Huh Kyung young claims to be this figure, whose arrival is foretold in ancient prophecies. He also interprets the phrase “gong-jeon-myeol-byeong” (空錢滅兵) as an ancient prophecy indicating his surname, “Heo,” by eliminating the “Kim” character from the word “money” (錢, which contains 金).

The lecture concludes by emphasizing the importance of “integration, convergence, and harmony” in the 21st century. Politicians who advocate for conflict, symbolized by clenching a fist, are seen as unfit for this era. Huh Kyung young’s centrist ideology is presented as borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan, destined to unify the world. He argues that American democracy and capitalism, now a “100-year-old elder,” are obsolete and have created a system where 1% controls 99% of the wealth. The U.S. maintains its global economic dominance through intellectual property and royalties, extracting wealth from other nations. While Sanders’s call for reform is acknowledged, the speaker asserts that the U.S., as the world’s reserve currency holder, cannot abandon its nationalistic policies. Therefore, only Huh Kyung young’s centrist ideology can truly bring about the necessary global transformation.

세계 정치인의 정책 분석: 힐러리와 샌더스의 대조

오늘 강연에서는 대선 후보들에 대해 이야기하고, 특히 미국 대선 주자들의 가능성과 세계 정치인들의 정책 문제를 짚어보고자 합니다. 내년부터 병신년이 시작되니, 세계 정세에 대해 말씀드리겠습니다.

힐러리의 공약은 전반적으로 합리적입니다. 미국이라는 나라는 정통성이 있어야 합니다. 미국을 중국보다 더 급진적으로 몰고 가는 샌더스는 문제가 있습니다. 여러분은 샌더스의 인기가 올라가니 그 사람이 괜찮다고 생각할 수 있지만, 샌더스의 급진주의는 미국 민주당의 좌파보다도 더 좌측으로 끌고 가며, 이렇게 되면 중국보다도 더 좌파가 되는 것입니다. 미국은 힐러리와 같은 국수주의 정책 때문에 존재합니다. 만약 샌더스처럼 월가를 없애고 대형 은행을 없애는 정책을 쓴다면, 미국의 돈이 홍콩으로 모두 빠져나가 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 될 것입니다. 월가를 해체하면 제2의 공산주의 국가가 되고 중국이 민주주의 국가가 되는 것과 같습니다. 이는 미국이 기득권을 포기하겠다는 소리와 같습니다.

미국의 간접 선거 제도와 그 본질
미국은 간접 선거로 대통령을 뽑습니다. 한국은 직접 선거로 뽑으니, 민주주의는 우리가 미국보다 100년 앞서 있습니다. 미국은 박정희 대통령 시절의 통일주체 대의원 제도를 지금도 유지하고 있습니다. 3억 명의 미국인이 538명의 선거인단을 뽑고, 이 중 270명 이상을 얻어야 대통령이 됩니다. 지난 대선에서 부시와 고어 후보가 269명씩 동수를 받았고, 고어 후보가 수백만 표 더 많았음에도 선거인단 수에서 동률을 이뤘습니다. 샌더스가 힐러리보다 두 배 많은 표를 얻어도 선거인단을 많이 가져갈 수 없습니다. 선거인단은 미국의 보수 세력, 즉 자본가, 금융가, 군수 산업가들이 장악하고 있습니다. 이들은 흑인이 대통령이 되는 것을 막기 위해 간접 선거 제도를 만들었고, 선거인단은 모두 백인이었습니다. 오바마는 어머니가 백인이었기에 대통령이 될 수 있었지만, 흑인은 절대 대통령이 될 수 없도록 되어 있습니다. 미국은 3억 명이 538명의 선거인단을 뽑고, 이 선거인단이 다시 대통령을 뽑는 구조입니다. 결국 선거인단을 누가 많이 확보하느냐가 중요합니다. 샌더스가 아무리 인기가 좋아도, 한국처럼 허경영이 인기가 좋으면 대통령이 되는 것과 달리, 미국에서는 대통령이 될 수 없습니다.

샌더스 정책의 위험성과 안철수의 사대주의
샌더스의 월가 해체 정책은 미국 내 모든 돈을 홍콩으로 도피시켜 미국을 종이 호랑이로 만들고 달러 가치를 하락시켜 경제를 망하게 할 것입니다. 서민을 돕는다는 명분으로 힐러리의 국수주의를 무너뜨리는 것은 미국에 간단한 문제가 아닙니다. 안철수라는 사람이 샌더스를 닮았다고 말하는 것은 사대주의적 발상입니다.

허경영의 중산주의와 기존 정치인들의 모방
허경영의 정책은 월가를 해체하거나 대형 은행을 없애는 것이 아닙니다. 부자들이 존경받는 사회를 만들고, 없는 사람들에게 제대로 분배하여 부자가 존경받게 하자는 것입니다. 부자들의 세금을 무조건 뺏는 것이 아니라, 현재 부과되는 세금을 제대로 거두면 됩니다. 정치인들이 세금을 깎아주는 것이 문제이며, 제대로만 거두면 됩니다.

안철수의 사대주의를 보면 우리나라 사람들이 기가 막힙니다. 제가 국회의원을 100명으로 줄이겠다고 말하자 안철수도 국회의원을 100명으로 줄이겠다고 했습니다. 저는 25년 전부터 이야기한 30년 정치 인생을 가진 사람인데, 그 사람은 정치 인생이 몇 년 안 되어 무조건 모방만 합니다. 안철수가 당을 나가 분파를 만드는 것은 당 대표로서 분파를 없애야 할 책임과 상반됩니다. 이런 분파주의나 사대주의를 가진 사람들이 정치를 개혁한다고 믿을 수 없습니다. 1% 상류층인 안철수가 주먹을 쥐는 것은 노동자 서민들이 주먹을 쥘 판에 기득권이 주먹을 쥐는 것과 같습니다. 재산 2천억이 넘는 상류층이 주먹을 쥐면 국민은 졸도해야 할 것입니다. 이자도, 월세도, 전기세도 못 내는 사람들이 참고 있는데, 그 사람이 그들을 대변한다고 말하는 것은 국민을 속이는 것입니다.

김무성 새누리당 대표의 보수주의도 너무 안일합니다. 인구 증가를 위해 조선족을 데려와야 한다거나, 중산층이 투표를 안 하도록 하는 것이 다음 선거에 이기는 관건이라고 말하는 것은 문제가 많습니다. 돈이 없어서 결혼을 못 하는 상황에서 조선족을 데려와 출산율을 올리겠다는 것은 좋은 생각이 아닙니다.

문재인 대표는 표방주의, 즉 모방주의입니다. 제가 노인 수당을 주겠다고 하자, 이분은 70% 노인에게 20만 원씩 주겠다고 했습니다. 박근혜 대통령은 20%에게 20만 원씩 주고 있는데, 20만 원은 노인 수당으로 도움이 되지 않습니다. 국회의원 월급을 반납하고 기득권을 포기하여 제대로 드려야 합니다. 저는 20년 전부터 70만 원을 주장했습니다. 20만 원은 국민을 기만하는 것입니다. 선거 끝나면 20%로 줄여버리는 행태를 보입니다. 제가 대통령이 되면 그렇게 하지 않을 것입니다.

100조의 예산을 늘리고 싶다면 미국처럼 직불 카드를 의무적으로 사용하게 하여 모든 결제 기록을 남기면 됩니다. 이렇게 세금 제도를 완벽하게 만들면 연간 100조 정도의 탈루 세금이 국가로 들어올 것입니다. 그러면 노인 수당 70만 원을 지급하고도 연간 200조가 남을 것입니다. 버스 회사 사장이 연봉 4~5천만 원을 받는 것은 국민을 속이는 것입니다.

정치인들의 관상과 사주: 전업 사주와 평행 사주
힐러리는 당돌하고 진실성이 있는 공작상입니다. 이것이 장점이자 단점으로 작용하여 대중들에게 밀리는 경향이 있습니다. 샌더스는 목이 긴 독수리상으로, 미국의 상징물과 일치합니다. 샌더스는 진정성과 참신성이 있어 젊은 사람들이 좋아합니다. 나이가 많아도 참신해 보이는 것이 그의 강점입니다. 미국 대통령 선거는 힐러리의 당돌성과 진실성, 샌더스의 참신성과 진정성의 싸움입니다.

샌더스는 미국을 소련처럼 만들려 합니다. 그의 정책은 미국의 현실에 맞지 않아 앞으로 문제가 될 것입니다. 김무성 대표는 조선족을 데려와 인구 증가율을 높이자는 주장을 했습니다. 또한 중산층 투표를 안 하게 하는 것이 다음 선거에 이기는 관건이라고 말했습니다. 이러한 보수주의는 너무 안일합니다.

안철수는 전업 사주를 가지고 태어났습니다. 신영균 씨도 전업 사주입니다. 샌더스는 평행 사주로, 30년간 정치만 하는 사람입니다. 반면 안철수는 의사, CEO, 교수, 정치인 등 직업을 계속 옮깁니다. 직업을 옮길수록 인기가 떨어지는 전업 사주입니다. 샌더스는 다른 당에 있다가 무소속으로, 다시 민주당으로 들어갔지만, 안철수는 민주당에 있다가 나왔으니 반대입니다. 신영균 씨는 치과 의사에서 배우, 사업가, 정치인, 방송인으로 직업을 바꿀수록 성공했습니다. 전업 사주도 올라가는 자가 있고 내려가는 자가 있습니다. 안철수는 직업을 바꿀수록 내려가는 사주입니다. 이런 사람이 대통령이 되면 나라의 국운도 내려갈 것입니다.

우리나라는 국운을 상승시킨 지도자를 뽑은 적이 거의 없습니다. 박정희 대통령 외에는 모두 대한민국 이름 뒤에 숨어 자신의 이익만 챙겼습니다. 변호사, 검사, 형사, 심지어 평양에서 김일성 만세를 부른 사람이 국회의원이 되는 등 우리나라 국회의원들은 이상하게 됩니다.

정치인에게 가장 중요한 것은 진정성입니다. 국민을 속이지 않고, 거짓말하지 않으며, 울리지 않는 자가 필요합니다. 그러나 샌더스의 정책은 너무 급진적이고 좌편향되어 있습니다.

운명과 마음의 중요성: 병신년의 기회
인간 세상의 운명은 사주와 관상으로 정해져 있습니다. 2016년 병신년까지의 과거는 바꿀 수 없습니다. 그러나 오늘 이후부터는 누구든지 자기 운명을 자기 마음으로 바꿀 수 있는 특혜가 주어져 있습니다. 과거를 원망하거나 괴로워할 필요가 없습니다. 오늘 이후에는 전생의 업보에 허경영의 강의를 듣고 깨달은 마음이 더해져 운명을 바꿀 수 있습니다. 병신년은 마음 놓고 운명을 바꿀 수 있는 해입니다. 여러분의 마음에 허경영을 넣어야 합니다.

현재 대한민국은 1%의 상류층, 5%의 상류층이 우리나라 돈의 99%를 가지고 있는 미국과 같은 형태를 향해 가고 있습니다. 중산층은 거의 붕괴되었고, 대부분의 재산은 은행 빚으로 인해 마이너스입니다. 이러한 상황은 정치인들이 만든 것입니다. 여러분의 자식 손자는 나중에 북한 사람, 중국 사람, 대만 사람들에게 종노릇 해야 먹고살게 될 것입니다. 한민족의 미래가 어둡습니다. 그래서 제가 이 땅에 와 있습니다.

정치인들의 관상과 허경영의 중산주의
안철수는 염소상, 샌더스는 독수리상, 힐러리는 공작상, 문재인은 소상, 김무성은 이무기상, 유승민은 쥐상 또는 고양이상입니다. 박원순도 염소상이라 안철수와 사이가 좋습니다. 염소나 양은 직업을 자주 바꾸면 좋지 않습니다. 문재인은 소상이므로 변호사, 비서실장, 당 대표, 대통령 후보 등 직업을 바꾸는 것이 괜찮습니다. 소는 밭도 갈고 논도 매고 짐도 싣는 등 다양한 역할을 합니다. 그러나 안철수처럼 염소상이 직업을 자꾸 바꾸면 내려가는 것입니다.

제가 상을 이야기하는 이유는 미국의 대통령이 누가 될지 알려주기 위함입니다. 저는 이런 정치인들의 관상과 비교하면 재수가 없습니다. 저는 예언서에 나와 있는 해인 시대, 즉 인터넷 시대에 하늘에서 온 사람입니다. 언어도단 시대, 즉 말도 경전도 진리도 통하지 않는 시대에 제가 나타났습니다. 여자들이 담배를 피우고 비행기와 인공위성이 날아다니는 시대입니다. 신언서판, 즉 얼굴 잘생기고 말 잘하고 글 잘 쓰고 판단력이 뛰어난 자가 반드시 온다고 했습니다. 제가 30년 전에 만든 공약들을 따라쟁이들이 모방하고 있습니다. 결혼하면 1억을 준다는 공약만 아직 따라하지 못하고 있습니다.

임금이나 석가모니는 양기가 가장 강한 오시(11시~1시)에 밥을 먹습니다. 이 오시에 말씀을 가져온 자가 허씨입니다. 십자가 위에 있는 하나님, 시방 세계 위에 있는 부처의 말을 가지고 온 자가 허씨입니다. 허씨는 윤허를 받고 허락받은 권력을 가진 자입니다. 저는 벼락처럼 나타나 대통령이 될 때 갑자기 인기가 폭발할 것입니다. 지난 대선 때 밤 12시에 한 번의 TV 토론만 했음에도 인기가 하늘을 솟았습니다. 민주당 당직자 회의에서도 허경영의 선거라고 말할 정도였습니다.

저는 공전멸병(空錢滅兵)을 통해 김씨를 비우고 허씨가 남는다는 예언을 풀이했습니다. 옛날 임금이 허씨를 죽일까 봐 암호로 해놓은 것입니다.

융합과 화합의 시대에 싸움을 부추기는 정치인들
현재는 해인 시대, 디지털 시대이며, 통일의 3대 요소인 융합, 통합, 화합의 시대입니다. 그런데 샌더스는 주먹을 높이 들고 싸우겠다고 합니다. 우리나라에서는 안철수가 이를 따라 주먹을 들고 싸우겠다고 합니다. 싸움을 말려야 할 사람들이 국회에 가서 싸우겠다고 하는 것은 말이 안 됩니다. 샌더스는 좌파이므로 그럴 수 있지만, 새누리당과 연대 가능성이 있는 안철수가 주먹을 쥐는 것은 보기 좋지 않습니다. 융합, 통합, 화합의 시대에는 주먹을 쥐고 싸우는 것이 아니라, 연합, 집합, 결합, 혼합, 용해, 발효, 양보, 소통이 필요합니다. 국민은 국회에서 싸우는 것에 진절머리가 납니다.

정치는 논문을 받은 자들, 즉 대학에서 박사 학위를 받은 자들이 하고 있습니다. 이들은 실제 경험이 없는데도 우리나라를 이끌어 가고 있어 문제가 많습니다. 통합의 3대 요소는 연합, 집합, 결합입니다. 융합의 3대 요소는 혼합, 용해, 발효입니다. 화합의 3대 요소는 양보, 소통, 박입니다. 이러한 시대에 주먹을 불끈 쥐고 싸우겠다는 것은 시대정신에 역행하는 것입니다.

미국의 국수주의와 한반도 정세
미국의 국수주의는 현재 우리가 미국과 싸울 수는 없지만, 미국의 대선이 우리에게 중요한 이유는 미국이 한반도를 누르고 있는 형국이기 때문입니다. 미국은 목(木)의 기운으로 우리 토(土)를 누르고 있습니다. 소련은 수(水)의 기운으로 우리에게 끌려다니고, 일본은 화(火)의 기운으로 일어났으며, 중국은 금(金)의 기운으로 우리와 상생합니다. 현재 시국적으로 미국이 한반도를 누르고 있어 북한이 꼼짝할 수 없습니다.

미국 대통령이 누가 되느냐에 따라 한반도 정세가 달라집니다. 힐러리가 되면 패권주의로 한반도 전쟁이 날 수 있습니다. 샌더스가 되면 미국의 패권이 죽고, 미국 달러 가치가 떨어져 우리 경제도 몰락할 수 있습니다. 샌더스 한 사람이 미국의 대통령이 되는 날, 우리나라 돈과 미국의 돈은 홍콩으로 도망갈 것입니다. 돈의 흐름에 따라 나라 경제가 좌우됩니다. 이러한 급진주의는 미국을 위험하게 할 수 있습니다.

허경영의 중산주의: 세계를 통일하는 진리
허경영의 중산주의는 무국경, 무차별, 무정파입니다. 이러한 중산주의는 기존의 자본주의나 민주주의와 비교할 수 없는 진리입니다. 미국의 민주주의와 자본주의는 100살 노인과 같아 이제 폐기 처분할 때가 되었습니다. 이들이 만들어낸 것은 1%의 상류층이 미국 돈의 99%를 가지는 사회입니다. 미국 국민은 돈의 노예가 되어 있습니다.

우리나라는 미국에 무역 수지는 흑자이지만 경상 수지는 적자입니다. 미국은 우리나라에서 로열티를 많이 받아갑니다. 햄버거, 코카콜라 등 미국의 브랜드들이 전 세계에서 로열티를 가져갑니다. 미국은 전 세계 천재들에게 장학금을 주어 미국인으로 만들고, 그들을 이용해 기술 특허를 내고 돈을 받아갑니다. 지식 산업으로 세계 경제를 장악하고 있는 것입니다.

샌더스의 말대로 민주주의와 자본주의는 이제 중산주의로 수정할 때가 왔지만, 샌더스가 이를 할 수는 없습니다. 미국은 국수주의를 포기할 수 없는 나라입니다. 세계 화폐의 기축 통화를 하는 나라이기 때문에 우리나라처럼 함부로 개혁하기 어렵습니다.

Meeting Minutes: The Truth of Hillary’s Nationalism, Sanders’ Radicalism, Ahn Cheol-soo’s Sadaejuui, Kim Moo-sung’s Conservatism, Moon Jae-in’s Factionalism, and Huh Kyung-young’s Centrist Ideology

Ⅰ. Meeting Overview
Category
Details
Date
February 6, 2016
Event
1012th Huh Kyung-young Saturday Lecture
Speaker
Huh Kyung-young
Topic
Analysis of presidential candidates’ policies (US and Korea) and global political landscape, focusing on “Centrist Ideology”
Key Concepts Discussed
Nationalism, Radicalism, Sadaejuui (servility to great powers), Conservatism, Factionalism, Centrist Ideology, Indirect vs. Direct Elections, Trans-fat, Political reform, Fate and Karma, Economic inequality, Face reading (physiognomy)

Ⅱ. Meeting Discussion
Analysis of US Presidential Candidates
Hillary Clinton (Nationalism): Her policies are generally traditional and rooted in American exceptionalism . She is described as having a “peacock face” (공작상), characterized by being overly bold and confident, which can be a disadvantage to the public . However, she also projects an image of truthfulness .
Bernie Sanders (radicalism): His progressive policies, such as dismantling Wall Street and large banks, are seen as problematic for the US economy . Such policies could lead to capital flight to places like Hong Kong, weakening the US dollar and potentially allowing China to dominate the global economy . Sanders’ radicalism is considered too far left, even more so than China’s communism . He is described as having a “long-necked eagle face” (목이 긴 독수리상), symbolizing America’s national animal . His strengths include sincerity and a fresh image, despite his age, which appeals to younger voters . However, his policies are deemed unrealistic for the US .
US Electoral System: The US uses an indirect electoral system, where electors choose the president, unlike South Korea’s direct election system . This system, established by conservative forces, historically aimed to prevent non-white presidents . Even if a candidate receives more popular votes, the electoral college ultimately decides the presidency .

Critique of South Korean Politicians
Ahn Cheol-soo (Sadaejuui/Servility to Great Powers): Ahn is criticized for imitating Sanders’ radical policies, which is seen as a “sadaejuui” (servility to great powers) mindset . He is also criticized for adopting Huh Kyung-young’s policy of reducing the number of National Assembly members . Ahn is described as having a “goat face” (염소상) and a “job-hopping fate” (전업 사주) that leads to declining popularity with each career change . His factionalism is also highlighted as detrimental to the opposition party .
Kim Moo-sung (conservatism): Kim’s conservative policies, such as suggesting bringing in ethnic Koreans from China to boost the birth rate, are criticized as naive and inadequate . He is also noted for suggesting that discouraging middle-class voting is key to winning the next election . He is described as having an “Imugi face” (이무기상) .
Moon Jae-in (Factionalism/Imitation): Moon is criticized for imitating Huh Kyung-young’s welfare policies, specifically the elderly allowance . While Huh proposed 700,000 won, Moon suggested 200,000 won for 70% of the elderly, which is seen as insufficient and a deceptive tactic to gain votes . Moon is described as having an “ox face” (소상) and a “job-hopping fate” (전업 사주) that is suitable for various roles .
General Critique of Korean Politicians: Many Korean politicians are labeled as “imitators” (따라쟁이) who copy Huh Kyung-young’s policies without proper implementation . They are also criticized for creating economic inequality and failing to address the financial struggles of ordinary citizens .

Huh Kyung-young’s “Centrist Ideology”
Core Principles: Huh’s “Centrist Ideology” (중산주의) is presented as borderless, non-discriminatory, and non-partisan, aiming to unify the world . It contrasts with the perceived failures of capitalism and democracy, which have led to extreme wealth concentration .
Policy Examples: Huh’s policies, such as providing 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage, are highlighted as genuine solutions to societal problems . He also advocates for a perfect tax system through mandatory debit card usage to prevent tax evasion, which could generate significant revenue for welfare programs .
Prophetic Role: Huh claims to be a divine figure sent to Earth to guide humanity, emphasizing the importance of calling his name to overcome future calamities . He asserts that his teachings and policies are recorded for future generations .
Face Reading and Fate: Huh discusses the concept of “face reading” (관상) and “fate” (사주), suggesting that a person’s appearance and birth chart influence their destiny . He uses this to predict political outcomes and to differentiate between those whose careers ascend and those who decline . He also emphasizes that while past karma cannot be changed, one’s future can be altered through a change of heart and by embracing his teachings .
Symbolism of Utensils: The speaker highlights the significance of everyday objects, such as plates, in influencing one’s fate, citing the example of former First Lady Yuk Young-soo .

Global geopolitics
US Influence on Korea: The US is seen as dominating the Korean Peninsula, preventing North Korea from acting freely .
China and Japan: China is viewed as a supportive force for Korea, while Japan is seen as a rising power that has historically aided Korea’s economy .
Impact of US Presidential Election: The outcome of the US presidential election is crucial for Korea. A Hillary Clinton presidency could lead to war due to her “hegemonic” (패권주의) tendencies, while a Bernie Sanders presidency could cause the US dollar to fall, leading to economic collapse in Korea .

Ⅲ. Action Items
Audience: Reflect on the presented political analyses and consider the implications for personal and national future .
Audience: Review Huh Kyung-young’s 33 policy pledges .

Analysis of presidential candidates’ policies (US and Korea) and global political landscape, focusing on “Centrist Ideology”

Key Concepts Discussed

Nationalism, Radicalism, Sadaejuui (servility to great powers), Conservatism, Factionalism, Centrist Ideology, Indirect vs. Direct Elections, Trans-fat, Political reform, Fate and Karma, Economic inequality, Face reading (physiognomy)

1. Character Profiles
   Hillary | US Presidential Candidate | Advocates for nationalism and traditional policies .

Sanders | US Presidential Candidate | Represents radicalism, aiming to dismantle Wall Street and large banks .

Ahn Cheol-soo | Korean Politician | Described as a sycophant, mimicking Sanders’ radical policies and exhibiting a “job-hopping” fate .

Kim Moo-sung | Korean Politician (Saenuri Party Leader) | Represents conservatism, suggesting bringing in Korean-Chinese to boost birth rates .

Moon Jae-in | Korean Politician | Characterized by factionalism and imitation, proposing an expanded elderly allowance .

Heo Kyung-young | Speaker/Political Figure | Advocates for “Middle-Class-ism” (중산주의), a unique ideology that transcends national borders, discrimination, and political factions .

Shin Young-kyun | Actor/Politician | Possesses a “job-hopping” fate that leads to continuous success and upward mobility .

Yoo Seung-min | Korean Politician | Described as having a “cat-like” appearance .

Park Won-soon | Korean Politician | Described as having a “goat-like” appearance, similar to Ahn Cheol-soo .

3. Scene-by-Scene Summary

1 (00:00:00) US Presidential Candidates and Global Politics

The speaker discusses potential US presidential candidates and the problematic policies of global politicians .

Hillary’s policies are generally nationalistic, which is seen as essential for the US’s legitimacy .

Sanders’ radicalism, aiming to abolish Wall Street and major banks, is problematic as it could shift global economic dominance to China .

The US indirect election system, where electors choose the president, is highlighted as less advanced than Korea’s direct election system .

The electoral college, dominated by conservative forces, capital, finance, and military industrialists, aims to maintain white control over the presidency .

Sanders’ popularity among the general public does not guarantee victory due to the electoral college system .

Dismantling Wall Street would cause US capital to flee to Hong Kong, weakening the US dollar and collapsing the US economy .

Ahn Cheol-soo’s comparison of himself to Sanders is criticized as sycophantic .

2 (00:04:25) The Speaker’s Identity and Mission

The speaker introduces himself as the “Original Sun” (본태양), an energy source that governs human souls, unlike the “True Sun” (진태양) which governs life .

He claims to have appeared at a critical juncture for Earth’s orbital correction .

He states his purpose is to tell people to call his name, not just to lecture, and that his lectures serve to prove his non-earthly origin .

His videos are recorded for future generations to witness his teachings .

An anecdote is shared about a person almost falling while hiking but being saved by watching the speaker’s YouTube videos .

3 (00:07:00) Critique of Western Diet and Korean Politicians

The speaker criticizes the American diet, including bread, bacon, and popcorn, as unhealthy and carcinogenic .

He warns against blindly imitating American culture, as it has caused significant harm to Koreans .

Ahn Cheol-soo’s radical policies, similar to Sanders’, are seen as detrimental to the US dollar and global leadership .

The speaker’s policies aim to create a society where the wealthy are respected through proper wealth distribution, not by seizing their assets .

He criticizes politicians for reducing taxes for the wealthy instead of collecting them properly .

Ahn Cheol-soo is accused of copying the speaker’s proposals, such as reducing the number of National Assembly members .

Ahn Cheol-soo’s factionalism is blamed for weakening the opposition party .

Ahn Cheol-soo, as a member of the top 1% wealthy, is criticized for claiming to represent the common people .

Kim Moo-sung’s conservative proposal to increase birth rates by bringing in Korean-Chinese is deemed naive .

Moon Jae-in is criticized for imitating the speaker’s elderly allowance policy but offering a significantly smaller amount, which is seen as deceiving the public .

The speaker proposes a direct debit card system to prevent tax evasion, which could generate 100 trillion won annually and allow for a 700,000 won elderly allowance .

He criticizes the current political system for corruption and mismanagement of national finances .

4 (00:16:00) Character Analysis of US Presidential Candidates

Hillary is described as having a “peacock-like” appearance, characterized by excessive boldness and a perceived lack of humility, which is a disadvantage despite her apparent sincerity .

Sanders is described as having a “long-necked eagle-like” appearance, symbolizing America, and possessing sincerity and freshness, making him appealing to younger generations .

The US presidential election is framed as a contest between Hillary’s boldness and sincerity versus Sanders’ freshness and sincerity .

Sanders’ policies are considered too radical and unrealistic for the US, aiming to transform it into a socialist state .

5 (00:20:00) Analysis of Korean Politicians’ Fates

Ahn Cheol-soo is described as having a “job-hopping” fate (전업 사주) that leads to declining popularity with each career change, unlike Shin Young-kyun, whose “job-hopping” fate led to increasing success .

Sanders, in contrast, has a “parallel fate” (평행 사주), maintaining a consistent political career .

The speaker warns that electing a leader with a declining “job-hopping” fate would lead to national decline .

He criticizes the arbitrary nature of Korean politicians’ career paths, citing examples of individuals from various professions becoming National Assembly members .

The speaker claims to possess cosmic energy to control the fate of nations and leaders, but chooses to remain passive until he becomes president .

He criticizes Moon Jae-in for not preventing factionalism within his party, leading to Ahn Cheol-soo’s departure .

Sincerity is highlighted as the most crucial quality for a politician .

Sanders’ policies are criticized for being too radical and left-leaning .

6 (00:26:00) The Power of Mind and National Fate

The speaker asserts that while the past cannot be changed, the future can be altered by one’s mindset, especially after hearing his lecture .

He emphasizes the importance of embracing his teachings to change one’s destiny .

He warns that without his guidance, Korea is heading towards a future where 1% of the elite control 99% of the wealth, similar to the US .

The speaker claims that current politicians have created a system where most citizens are burdened by debt, making them effectively “zero” in terms of assets .

He predicts a bleak future for Korean descendants, forced into servitude by other nations .

7 (00:29:00) Animalistic Characterizations of Politicians

The speaker assigns animalistic traits to various politicians: Kim Moo-sung as a “dragon-like serpent” (이무기상), Ahn Cheol-soo as a “goat-like” (염소상), Sanders as an “eagle-like” (독수리상), Hillary as a “peacock-like” (공작상), Moon Jae-in as an “ox-like” (소상), and Yoo Seung-min as a “cat-like” (살쾡이 상) .

He notes that Ahn Cheol-soo and Park Won-soon share “goat-like” features, explaining their good relationship .

He explains that “job-hopping” is detrimental for “goat-like” individuals like Ahn Cheol-soo, but acceptable for “ox-like” individuals like Moon Jae-in due to their adaptable nature .

The speaker implies that these characterizations reveal the predetermined outcomes of political careers, including who will become president .

8 (00:33:00) The Speaker’s Prophetic Role and Unique Qualities

The speaker states that he is beyond comparison with other politicians, as his arrival is foretold in prophecies .

He describes the current era as the “Age of Unspeakable Words” (언어도단 시대), characterized by moral decay and advanced technology .

He claims to embody the “Four Virtues” (신언서판) – good looks, eloquence, writing skills, and judgment – as described in prophecies .

He highlights that his policies, created 30 years ago, have been copied by other politicians, except for the marriage incentive .

The speaker explains that his name, Heo (許), signifies “permission” or “authorization” from heaven, indicating his divine mandate .

He asserts that he will appear suddenly and powerfully when he becomes president, overwhelming the public with his popularity .

He recounts how his previous presidential campaign, despite limited media exposure, gained immense popularity, even among rival parties .

He interprets the prophecy “공전멸병” (空前滅兵) as an ancient code indicating the removal of the “Kim” surname to reveal the “Heo” surname, signifying his destined role .

9 (00:40:00) The Significance of Objects and Political Ideologies

The speaker discusses the significance of objects, citing the example of former First Lady Yuk Young-soo’s plate, which resembled a gun barrel and was associated with her tragic fate .

He advises against using ill-omened objects and emphasizes the importance of choosing auspicious items, even for everyday use .

He contrasts the “Age of Integration, Unification, and Harmony” (융합과 통합과 화합의 시대) with politicians like Sanders and Ahn Cheol-soo who advocate for conflict .

He criticizes politicians for fighting among themselves instead of uniting, which he believes is a strategy to make him president .

He defines the three elements of integration as “alliance, collection, and combination” (연합, 집합, 결합) and the three elements of convergence as “mixing, dissolving, and fermenting” (혼합, 용해, 발효) .

He defines harmony as “concession, communication, and cooperation” (양보, 소통, 박) .

He emphasizes that one’s true opponent is oneself, and he only competes with his own policies, which have remained consistent for 25 years .

He notes that his policy of adjusting the time zone was adopted by North Korea .

He criticizes politicians for lacking real-world experience, despite their academic credentials .

10 (00:46:00) Geopolitical Analysis and the Rise of Middle-Class-ism

The speaker presents a geopolitical model where the US (wood) suppresses Korea (earth), while China (metal) and Japan (fire) have a supportive relationship with Korea .

He states that Russia (water) is subservient to Korea .

He explains that the US’s dominance prevents North Korea from acting freely .

He warns that Hillary’s presidency could lead to war due to her hawkish policies, while Sanders’ presidency could lead to economic collapse due to the weakening US dollar .

He emphasizes that the flow of money dictates a nation’s economic fate .

He reiterates that his “Middle-Class-ism” (중산주의) is a unique ideology that transcends national borders, discrimination, and political factions, destined to unify the world .

He declares that American democracy and capitalism, now a century old, are obsolete and will be replaced by “Middle-Class-ism” .

He criticizes American capitalism for creating a system where 1% of the population controls 99% of the wealth, enslaving the rest .

He points out that despite Korea’s trade surplus with the US, it incurs a current account deficit due to royalty payments to American companies for intellectual property and brands .

He concludes that while Sanders recognizes the need to reform democracy and capitalism, he cannot implement “Middle-Class-ism” due to the US’s inherent nationalism and role as a global reserve currency issuer .

4. Other Useful Information
   Lecture Date: February 6, 2016

Year of the Monkey (병신년): The speaker mentions that 2016 is the Year of the Monkey, which he associates with “fire” (불) and “True Sun” (진태양) .

Speaker’s Political Career: The speaker claims 30 years of political experience, having proposed policies 25 years prior that are now being copied by others .

Meridian Time: The speaker discusses the significance of the “O-si” (오시) period (11 AM to 1 PM) as the time of strongest solar energy, when kings and Buddha ate their meals .

Prophecy “공전멸병”: This ancient prophecy is interpreted as an encrypted message indicating the speaker’s surname, Heo (許), by removing the “Kim” (金) surname .

Integration, Convergence, and Harmony: These are presented as key concepts for the 21st century.

Integration (통합): Alliance (연합), Collection (집합), Combination (결합) .

Convergence (융합): Mixing (혼합), Dissolving (용해), Fermenting (발효) .

Harmony (화합): Concession (양보), Communication (소통), Cooperation (박) .

허경영이 말하는 미국 대선 후보들의 정책과 관상은? 힐러리는 국수주의적 공작상, 샌더스는 급진주의적 독수리상으로, 이들의 정책은 미국 경제에 위험을 초래할 수 있습니다.

1. 미국 대선 후보 분석
   힐러리 클린턴: 국수주의적 공작상으로, 당돌하고 진실성이 강함 .
   버니 샌더스: 급진주의적 독수리상으로, 진정성과 참신성이 강함 .
   샌더스 정책의 위험성: 월가 해체 시 미국 경제 붕괴 및 달러 가치 하락 우려 .
   미국 선거 제도: 간접 선거로, 선거인단이 실제 대통령을 뽑음 .

2. 한국 정치인 비판
   안철수: 사대주의적 염소상으로, 샌더스를 모방하며 직업을 자주 바꾸는 ‘전업 사주’가 부정적임 .
   김무성: 보수주의적 이무기상으로, 조선족 이민을 통한 출산율 증가 정책은 안일함 .
   문재인: 표방주의적 소상으로, 노인 수당 20만원은 국민 기만이며, 당내 분파를 조장함 .
   공통 비판: 허경영의 정책을 제대로 이해하지 못하고 모방하는 ‘따라쟁이’들임 .

3. 허경영의 중산주의와 비전
   본태양 에너지: 허경영은 인간 영혼을 관장하는 본태양 에너지를 가짐 .
   운명 개척: 2016년 이후부터는 개인의 마음으로 운명을 바꿀 수 있는 기회가 주어짐 .
   중산주의: 허경영의 정책은 부자를 존경하고 없는 사람에게 분배하는 중산주의임 .
   세계 통일: 허경영의 중산주의는 무국경, 무차별, 무정파로 전 세계를 통일할 진리임 .

This lecture analyzes the political ideologies and “animal physiognomy” of various presidential candidates, including Hillary Clinton’s nationalism (peacock), Bernie Sanders’ radicalism (vulture), and Ahn Cheol-soo’s sycophancy (goat). It argues that these politicians’ inherent “sajus” (fates) and “gwansangs” (physiognomy) dictate their political outcomes and the nation’s destiny, contrasting them with the speaker’s “centrist ideology” which he claims transcends such limitations.

1. Analysis of US Presidential Candidates and Their Ideologies
   The speaker analyzes the political ideologies and “animal physiognomy” of US presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, contrasting their approaches with the speaker’s own “centrist ideology.”

1.1. Hillary Clinton’s Nationalism and “Peacock Physiognomy”
Hillary Clinton’s policies are generally seen as having legitimacy .
The United States, as a nation, requires orthodoxy or traditional legitimacy .
Clinton’s policies are characterized by nationalism, which is considered essential for the US’s existence .
Hillary Clinton’s “animal physiognomy” is described as a peacock .
Peacocks are seen as having flaws, specifically being too bold or daring .
This boldness is a negative trait, as women are generally expected to be more reserved .
Her demeanor is described as “masculine” or “like a husband” (가부상) .
Another characteristic is her sincerity, making her appear truthful .
This combination of boldness and sincerity is both her strength and weakness .
Her boldness is why she is losing popularity to Sanders among the general public, who prefer a more gentle approach .

1.2. Bernie Sanders’ Radicalism and “Vulture Physiognomy”
Bernie Sanders’ radicalism is problematic for the US .
Sanders’ policies are more left-wing than even the Democratic Party’s left wing, potentially making the US more left-leaning than China .
His proposals, such as abolishing Wall Street and large banks, would cause US capital to flee to places like Hong Kong, allowing China to dominate the global economy .
Dismantling Wall Street would effectively turn the US into a communist state, while China would become more democratic .
This would mean the US giving up its privileges and economic power .
Such policies would turn the US into a “paper tiger,” leading to a decline in the value of the US dollar and economic collapse .
His efforts to help the common people would inadvertently destroy Hillary Clinton’s nationalism and the US’s foundation .
Sanders’ “animal physiognomy” is described as a long-necked vulture .
The vulture is a symbol of the US, aligning Sanders with the nation’s image .
Sanders’ strengths include sincerity and freshness .
He appears genuinely committed to his promises, making his words persuasive .
Despite his age (over 75), he projects a fresh image, which appeals to younger voters .
The US presidential election is a contest between Hillary’s boldness and sincerity versus Sanders’ freshness and sincerity .
Sanders’ policies are not suitable for the US, as they would transform it into a Soviet-like state .
Although he is a good speaker, his ideas are not practical for the US’s current reality .
Even if Sanders gains immense popularity and votes, he cannot become president due to the US’s indirect election system .
The US elects its president through an electoral college of 538 electors, not direct popular vote .
In contrast, South Korea uses a direct election system, which is considered more advanced (by 100 years) than the US system .
The US system is similar to South Korea’s past “National Conference for Unification” under President Park Chung-hee .
To win, a candidate needs 269 electoral votes .
In a past election, Bush and Gore each received 269 electoral votes, even though Gore had millions more popular votes .
The electoral college is dominated by conservative forces, including capitalists, financiers, and military industrialists, who aim to prevent a Black president .
This system was designed to ensure a white president, as evidenced by the all-white electoral college in the past .
Barack Obama was an exception because his mother was white, allowing him to gain both Black and white votes .
However, generally, Black individuals cannot become president due to the electoral college system .
Therefore, even if Sanders wins the popular vote, he needs the electors to vote for him, which is unlikely given the conservative nature of the electoral college .

1.3. Ahn Cheol-soo’s Sycophancy and “Goat Physiognomy”
Ahn Cheol-soo’s statement that he resembles Sanders is an act of sycophancy (사대주의) .
It is inappropriate for a South Korean presidential candidate to imitate a US candidate, as South Korea is the “center of the world” .
Ahn Cheol-soo has a “career-changing fate” (전업 사주) .
This type of fate means a person frequently changes professions .
Ahn’s career path includes being a doctor, CEO, professor, and politician .
Unlike some with “career-changing fates” who rise with each change, Ahn’s popularity decreases with each change, going from 50% to 0% .
For example, Shin Young-kyun, also with a “career-changing fate,” rose from dentist to actor, businessman, and politician, becoming more successful with each change .
Ahn’s constant “철수” (withdrawal/retreat) from political parties is a characteristic of his declining “career-changing fate” .
In contrast, Sanders has a “parallel fate” (평행 사주), meaning he stays in the same profession (politics) for decades .
Ahn’s tendency to leave parties (e.g., leaving the Democratic Party) is the opposite of Sanders’ path (e.g., joining the Democratic Party from independent status) .
A leader with a declining “career-changing fate” would cause the nation’s fortune to decline .
Ahn Cheol-soo is part of the 1% elite .
It is contradictory for someone with over 200 billion won in assets to claim to represent the common people and workers .
The public will not be deceived by such claims .
Ahn Cheol-soo is criticized for imitating the speaker’s policies .
For instance, the speaker proposed reducing the number of National Assembly members to 100, and Ahn later adopted this idea .
The speaker has been in politics for 30 years, while Ahn is relatively new, making his imitation seem opportunistic .
Ahn Cheol-soo’s “animal physiognomy” is a goat .
Goats are characterized by their prominent mouths, eyes, and noses .
They also have horns and can be stubborn .
Goats, like sheep, do not do well with frequent career changes .
This contrasts with a “cow” physiognomy (like Moon Jae-in), which can adapt to various roles .
A goat that frequently changes jobs will “get dirty” or decline .
This explains why Ahn’s career changes lead to a decline in his popularity .
Ahn Cheol-soo’s actions contribute to factionalism .
A party leader should unite, not create divisions, which has weakened the opposition party .
His decision to leave the party when he disagreed with the leader is likened to a child disowning a parent, which is unacceptable .
He is responsible for creating the party he later left .

1.4. Kim Moo-sung’s Conservatism and “Imoogi Physiognomy”
Kim Moo-sung’s conservatism is criticized for being too complacent .
He suggested bringing in ethnic Koreans from China (Joseonjok) to increase the birth rate due to declining population .
This is not a good solution, as South Koreans cannot afford to marry due to lack of money .
He also stated that the key to winning the next election for the Saenuri Party is to prevent the middle class from voting .
Kim Moo-sung’s “animal physiognomy” is an Imoogi (a mythical serpent that has not yet become a dragon) .
Kim Moo-sung is also accused of imitating the speaker’s policies .
He copies the speaker’s policies but does not implement them properly .
For example, to truly follow the speaker’s birth rate policy, he should propose giving 30 million won for childbirth and 100 million won for marriage .
The only policy not yet copied by other politicians is giving 100 million won for marriage, which will only happen when the speaker becomes president .
The public will realize that other politicians are merely imitating the speaker’s ideas .

1.5. Moon Jae-in’s Factionalism and “Cow Physiognomy”
Moon Jae-in is characterized by factionalism and imitation .
He imitates the speaker’s proposals, such as increasing elderly welfare payments .
While President Park Geun-hye gives 200,000 won to 20% of the elderly, Moon proposes giving 200,000 won to 70% .
However, 200,000 won is insufficient and is seen as “playing games” with the elderly .
Politicians should return their high salaries and privileges to provide proper support .
The speaker has advocated for 700,000 won for the elderly for 20-25 years .
Politicians secretly raise their own salaries while offering minimal support to the public, which is considered deception .
They use welfare promises to gain votes, only to reduce benefits after elections .
The speaker’s approach to funding welfare is different .
To increase the budget by 100 trillion won, the speaker would implement a mandatory debit card system like in the US .
This would ensure all transactions are recorded, preventing tax evasion and bringing in an additional 100 trillion won in taxes annually .
With such measures, even paying 700,000 won to the elderly would leave 200 trillion won remaining after national expenses .
This indicates the extent of “theft” occurring in the current system, where even bus company presidents earn 40-50 million won annually without doing much work .
The public should not be deceived any longer .
Moon Jae-in’s “animal physiognomy” is a cow .
A cow’s “career-changing fate” is considered acceptable because cows perform various tasks like plowing fields, pulling carts, and carrying loads .
This means a cow can change roles without negative consequences, unlike a goat .
Moon Jae-in is also criticized for his role in factionalism .
His refusal to hold a party convention is partly Ahn Cheol-soo’s fault .
A leader should be able to manage internal party dynamics to prevent members from leaving .

1.6. Other Politicians and Their “Animal Physiognomy”
Yoo Seong-min (유승민) has a rat physiognomy .
Park Won-soon (박원순) has a goat physiognomy, similar to Ahn Cheol-soo .
This explains their good relationship and why Ahn yielded to Park .
Park’s mouth, eyes, and nose resemble a goat’s .
These “animal physiognomies” determine their paths and political outcomes .

2. The Speaker’s “Centrist Ideology” and Divine Mission
   The speaker presents his “centrist ideology” as a superior, divinely ordained path that transcends the limitations of other political ideologies and is destined to unify the world.

2.1. The Speaker’s Unique Energy and Role
The speaker’s energy is unique and unlike anyone else’s in the universe .
Calling his name or seeing his picture causes a physical reaction, which can be scientifically tested .
Humans cannot survive without the energy of the “True Sun” (진태양), which governs life .
The speaker, however, represents the “Original Sun” (본태양), which controls human souls .
The speaker appeared at a time when the Earth’s orbit needed correction, signifying a critical juncture .
In the future, during a great plague, those who call the speaker’s name will be vastly different from those who do not .
The speaker’s purpose is not merely to lecture but to inform people to call his name .
He gives lectures to make his message engaging, so people will listen .
These lectures serve as proof that he is not from this world .
Thousands of these lectures are recorded on YouTube, ensuring that future generations can access his teachings .
People who watch his YouTube videos, even while hiking, experience positive outcomes, such as avoiding falls .
The speaker’s policies are fundamentally different from others .
He does not advocate for dismantling Wall Street or large banks .
Instead, he aims to create a society where the wealthy are respected and wealth is properly distributed to the less fortunate, rather than simply taking from the rich .
The problem is not the existence of taxes on the wealthy, but that politicians reduce them .

2.2. The Speaker’s Prophetic Qualities and Divine Authority
The speaker is described as a “prophet” whose arrival is foretold .
He is associated with the “Haein Era” (해인시대), an internet age where “seals” (dojang) are as numerous as the sea .
This era is also called the “Eon-eo-do-dan Era” (언어도단 시대), meaning a time when words, scriptures, truth, and the Way are no longer understood .
This era is characterized by women smoking in public and the prevalence of flying machines (airplanes, satellites) .
In this era, a person with “Shin-eon-seo-pan” (신언서판) will appear .
This refers to someone who is handsome, eloquent, skilled in writing, and possesses excellent judgment .
The speaker’s policies, created 30 years ago, are being imitated by other politicians, except for the marriage subsidy .
His ability to lecture in English and Chinese characters demonstrates his eloquence .
The speaker is connected to ancient wisdom and divine timing .
The time between 11 AM and 1 PM (오시) is when the universe’s energy is strongest, and emperors and Buddha (Sakyamuni) would eat at this time .
The speaker brings his message during this powerful “O-si” period .
He is also linked to the “십자가” (cross) and “시방세계” (ten directions of the world), representing God and Buddha, respectively .
His name, “Heo” (허), is associated with receiving “permission” or “authorization” (윤어, 허가, 허락) from heaven .
Therefore, he is a divinely authorized figure .
The speaker will appear suddenly and powerfully .
His popularity will be overwhelming, making it difficult for people to handle .
During a past presidential election, he was given only one TV debate at midnight, yet his popularity soared .
Even the Democratic Party acknowledged his significant influence on the election .
The speaker interprets the prophecy of “Gong-jeon-myeol-byeong” (공전멸병) .
This phrase, meaning “empty money, destroy soldiers,” is an ancient code .
“Money” (전) in this context refers to power and wealth, often taken by those with “iron spears” (창) .
“Destroy soldiers” (멸병) means to eliminate the “Kim” (김) surname, which is derived from the character for “soldier” (병사 병) .
By “emptying” or eliminating the Kim surname, only the “Heo” (허) surname remains .
This prophecy was encoded to protect the “Heo” family from being killed by kings .
Such a unique interpretation of characters is rare .

3. Critique of Current Political Landscape and Societal Issues
   The speaker criticizes the current political system, the unhealthy lifestyle promoted by American culture, and the economic disparity in South Korea, attributing these problems to incompetent politicians.

3.1. Unhealthy American Culture and Its Influence
American food culture is detrimental to health .
South Korean garlic and ginseng, when grown in the US, lose their distinct flavor and properties, indicating poor soil quality .
Americans consume unhealthy foods like bread, fried pork (bacon), and hamburgers, which are carcinogenic .
Popcorn, often consumed in large quantities at cinemas, can clog blood vessels due to its high trans fat content (equivalent to 20 servings) .
This unhealthy diet contributes to infertility in both men and women .
The Ministry of Education and other government officials are criticized for not addressing these issues .
American companies like Coca-Cola promote unhealthy food culture globally .
South Koreans should not blindly imitate American culture, as it can be harmful .

3.2. Economic Disparity and Political Failures in South Korea
South Korea faces severe economic inequality .
In the US, 1% of the upper class holds 99% of the wealth .
In South Korea, 5% of the upper class holds 90% of the wealth .
Most people are burdened by debt, with their homes effectively belonging to banks due to interest payments .
Foreign entities own 50% of banks, meaning interest payments flow out of the country .
Many people’s net worth is zero or negative when debts are considered .
The middle class is collapsing, and even inherited wealth is often consumed by debt .
This situation was created by politicians .
The future of the Korean people is bleak .
Future generations may have to serve people from North Korea, China, or Taiwan, performing menial jobs .
The speaker’s presence in South Korea is therefore fortunate .

3.3. The Importance of “Physiognomy” and Personal Items
The “animal physiognomy” of politicians is crucial for understanding their destiny .
For example, the late First Lady Yuk Young-soo used a plate with a gun-like design for a year before her assassination .
This suggests that objects can influence one’s fate .
Similarly, looking at people with “bad luck” physiognomy can bring bad luck .
Therefore, one should avoid using broken or oddly shaped dishes, as they can negatively impact fate .
Even the patterns on dishes should be auspicious .
The speaker advises changing the dishes used by family members to improve their fortune .
A person’s face also reflects their destiny .
For instance, Ronald Reagan’s humorous face made him popular, even after being shot .

4. The Era of Unity and the Speaker’s Vision
   The speaker emphasizes that the current era demands unity, integration, and harmony, contrasting this with the confrontational politics of other leaders and highlighting his own unique approach to global unification.

4.1. The “Haein Era” and the Need for Unity
The current era is the “Haein Era” (해인시대), characterized by digital technology .
This era requires unity, integration, and harmony .
However, politicians like Ahn Cheol-soo imitate Sanders by raising their fists and advocating for “fighting” .
This confrontational approach is inappropriate for leaders who should be promoting peace .
While Sanders, as a leftist, might be expected to be confrontational, Ahn Cheol-soo, who might ally with the Saenuri Party, should not .
The true enemy is oneself .
The speaker does not fight against other politicians’ policies but presents his own consistent policies to the public .
His policies, such as adjusting the time zone by 30 minutes, have even been adopted by North Korea .
Most of his policies, except for the most radical ones, have been imitated by both North and South Korean politicians .
The current political system is led by academics with no real-world experience, leading to problems .
The three elements of integration are alliance, aggregation, and combination .
The three elements of fusion are mixing, dissolving, and fermenting .
Mixing ingredients like flour, dissolving metals like gold and silver to make alloys, and fermenting foods like kimchi are examples of fusion .
The three elements of harmony are concession, communication, and cooperation .
In this era of unity, fusion, and harmony, politicians should not be raising their fists and advocating for conflict .
The public is tired of politicians fighting in the National Assembly .

4.2. Geopolitical Dynamics and the Speaker’s Role in Unification
The US’s presidential election is crucial for South Korea due to geopolitical dynamics .
The US (wood) dominates South Korea (earth) .
This means the US controls the Korean Peninsula .
Therefore, understanding US politics is essential .
However, if the speaker comes to power, the US will no longer be able to dominate South Korea .
Russia (water) is subservient to South Korea (earth) .
Japan (fire) supports South Korea (earth) .
For example, President Park Chung-hee received $600 million from Japan, which helped revive the South Korean economy .
China (metal) and South Korea (earth) have a mutually beneficial relationship .
The outcome of the US election directly impacts the Korean Peninsula .
If Hillary Clinton becomes president, there is a risk of war due to her hegemonic policies .
If Sanders becomes president, US hegemony would decline, and the South Korean economy would suffer due to a drop in the US dollar’s value .
Sanders’ presidency could lead to capital fleeing from the US and South Korea to Hong Kong .
Therefore, the flow of money dictates a nation’s economic fate .
Sanders’ radicalism could destabilize the US .
The speaker’s “Centrist Ideology” (중산주의) is superior .
It is borderless, indiscriminate, and non-partisan .
It is a truth that will eventually unify the entire world and cannot be compared to other ideologies .
American democracy and capitalism are now “100-year-old seniors” and are due for replacement by the Centrist Ideology .
These systems have created a situation where 1% of the US population owns 99% of the wealth, making most Americans “beggars” and “slaves to money” .
The US extracts wealth from other countries through royalties and intellectual property .
South Korea has a trade surplus with the US but a current account deficit due to royalty payments .
US companies like McDonald’s and Coca-Cola collect royalties globally .
The US attracts talented individuals from around the world with scholarships, uses their expertise to secure patents, and then collects royalties from their home countries .
US universities hold many patents, while South Korean universities lag due to flawed education .
While democracy and capitalism need reform, Sanders cannot achieve this because the US, as a global reserve currency issuer, cannot easily implement radical reforms like South Korea

허경영이 말하는 ‘중산주의’란 무엇인가? 중산주의는 100살 노인이 된 자본주의와 민주주의를 대체할 새로운 사상으로, 무국경, 무차별, 무정파를 지향하며 전 세계를 통일하는 진리입니다.

1. 미국 대선 후보 분석 및 한국 정치 비판
   미국 대선 후보들의 정책과 한국 정치인들의 문제점을 분석하고 비판한다.

1.1. 미국 대선 후보 분석
힐러리 클린턴: 국수주의 정책을 펼치며 미국을 지키려 한다 .
힐러리의 정책은 미국의 전통성을 유지하는 데 기여한다 .
힐러리의 장점은 당돌성과 진실성으로, 거짓말을 하지 않는 것처럼 보인다 .
그러나 대중은 당돌한 것을 싫어하고 나긋나긋한 것을 선호하여 샌더스에게 밀린다 .
버니 샌더스: 급진주의 정책을 펼치며 미국의 월가와 대형 은행을 없애려 한다 .
샌더스의 정책은 미국 달러 가치를 하락시키고, 미국의 돈이 홍콩으로 이동하여 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 만들 수 있다 .
이는 미국이 기득권을 포기하는 것과 같으며, 미국을 종이 호랑이로 만들 수 있다 .
샌더스의 장점은 진정성과 참신성으로, 젊은 층에게 인기가 많다 .
그러나 샌더스의 급진적인 정책은 미국의 현실에 맞지 않아 문제가 될 수 있다 .
미국의 간접 선거 제도: 미국은 간접 선거로 대통령을 선출하며, 이는 한국의 직접 선거보다 100년 뒤처진 제도이다 .
선거인단은 주로 보수 세력과 금융, 군수 산업가들로 구성되어 있으며, 이들이 미국의 자본을 지키려 한다 .
이들은 흑인 대통령을 막기 위해 간접 선거 제도를 만들었으며, 오바마는 어머니가 백인이었기에 대통령이 될 수 있었다 .
샌더스가 아무리 많은 표를 얻어도 선거인단의 지지를 받지 못하면 대통령이 될 수 없다 .

1.2. 한국 정치인 비판
안철수: 샌더스를 닮았다고 말하는 것은 사대주의 발상이다 .
안철수는 샌더스처럼 미국의 달러 가치를 하락시키고 세계 주도권을 포기하려는 급진주의 정책을 지지한다 .
안철수는 1%의 상류층임에도 노동자 서민을 대변하는 척하며 주목을 쥐는 행동을 한다 .
안철수는 허경영의 국회의원 100명 축소 공약을 따라 했지만, 제대로 따라 하지 못한다 .
안철수는 당을 분열시키는 분파주의를 보여주며, 이는 야당에 불리하게 작용한다 .
김무성: 보수주의를 표방하며 인구 증가를 위해 조선족을 데려오거나, 중산층이 투표를 안 하도록 하는 정책을 주장한다 .
이는 돈이 없어 결혼을 못 하는 현실을 외면한 안일한 생각이다 .
김무성 역시 허경영의 출산 정책을 따라 하려 하지만, 결혼 시 1억 원, 출산 시 3천만 원 지급과 같은 핵심 공약은 따라 하지 못한다 .
문재인: 표방주의 또는 모방주의를 보여준다 .
허경영이 노인 수당 70만 원을 주장하자, 문재인은 70% 노인에게 20만 원을 주겠다고 한다 .
20만 원은 노인에게 실질적인 도움이 되지 않으며, 이는 국민을 기만하는 행위이다 .
국회의원들이 자신들의 월급은 올리면서 국민에게는 생색내기식 정책을 펼친다 .
허경영은 직불카드 의무 사용으로 세금을 제대로 걷어 노인 수당 70만 원을 지급하고도 200조 원이 남는다고 말한다 .
현재 정치인들은 국민의 돈을 도둑질하고 있으며, 버스 회사 사장이 연봉 4~5천만 원을 받는 현실을 비판한다 .

2. 허경영의 중산주의와 예언
   허경영의 중산주의가 나아가야 할 방향을 제시하고, 자신의 예언자적 면모를 강조한다.

2.1. 정치인들의 상(相)과 사주(四柱)
정치인들의 상(相)
힐러리: 공작상으로, 당돌하고 당당한 모습이 특징이다 .
샌더스: 목이 긴 독수리상으로, 미국의 상징물과 일치한다 .
김무성: 이무기상이다 .
안철수: 염소상으로, 박원순과 사이가 좋은 이유이다 .
문재인: 소상으로, 직업을 자주 바꾸는 것이 괜찮다 .
유승민: 쥐상 또는 살쾡이상으로, 마음에 안 들면 핥퀴는 성격이다 .
박원순: 염소상으로, 안철수와 같은 상이다 .
안철수의 전업 사주: 안철수는 직업을 계속 바꾸는 전업 사주를 가졌다 .
안철수는 직업을 바꿀수록 인기가 떨어지는 하락형 전업 사주이다 .
샌더스는 평생 정치를 하는 평행 사주를 가졌으며, 안철수와는 반대이다 .
신영균은 안철수와 같은 전업 사주이지만, 직업을 바꿀수록 성공하는 상승형 전업 사주이다 .
신영균은 치과 의사에서 배우, 사업가, 정치인, 방송인으로 직업을 바꾸며 계속 성공했다 .
직업을 바꿀수록 인기가 떨어지는 안철수 같은 사람이 대통령이 되면 나라의 국운도 하락할 수 있다 .
정치인들의 진정성 부족: 국민을 속이고 거짓말하며 울리는 정치인은 진정성이 없다 .
한국 정치인들은 당 대표의 말을 듣지 않으면 탈당하는 등 분파주의적 행태를 보인다 .
이는 당을 본인이 만들었다고 생각하는 안철수 같은 사람들의 문제이다 .

2.2. 운명과 허경영의 역할
과거는 바꿀 수 없다: 2016년까지의 과거는 바꿀 수 없으며, 이는 전생의 업보이다 .
과거를 원망하거나 괴로워할 필요가 없으며, 과거 때문에 병이 생기기도 한다 .
미래는 바꿀 수 있다: 오늘 이후의 운명은 자신의 마음에 달려 있으며, 허경영의 가르침을 통해 바꿀 수 있다 .
허경영을 마음에 담으면 운명을 바꿀 수 있는 기회가 온다 .
현재 한국은 1%의 상류층이 99%의 돈을 가지고 있으며, 이는 미국과 유사한 상황이다 .
중산층은 붕괴되고 있으며, 많은 사람이 빚 때문에 재산이 없는 상태이다 .
이러한 상황은 정치인들이 만들었으며, 미래에는 자식들이 다른 나라에 가서 종노릇을 해야 할 수도 있다 .
허경영의 예언자적 면모: 허경영은 예언서에 나오는 해인 시대에 나타난 인물이다 .
해인 시대는 인터넷 시대이자, 말과 경전, 진리가 통하지 않는 언어도단 시대이다 .
이 시대에는 여자들이 담배를 피우고, 비행기와 인공위성이 날아다닌다 .
허경영은 신언서판을 갖춘 자로, 얼굴이 잘생기고 말 잘하며 글을 잘 쓰고 판단력이 뛰어나다 .
허경영의 공약은 30년 전부터 만들어졌으며, 결혼 시 1억 원 지급 공약 외에는 모든 정치인이 따라 하고 있다 .
허경영은 하늘에서 허락받은 권력을 가진 자로, 다른 정치인들과 비교할 수 없는 존재이다 .
허경영은 대통령이 될 때 벼락처럼 나타나며, 그의 인기는 감당할 수 없을 정도이다 .
과거 대선 TV 토론에서 밤 12시에 한 번만 출연했음에도 인기가 엄청났다 .
공전멸병(空錢滅兵)이라는 암호는 김씨를 비우면 허씨가 남는다는 뜻으로, 허경영을 예언한 것이다 .
그릇과 운명: 그릇의 모양과 무늬는 사람의 운명과 함께 간다 .
유경수 여사가 총구 모양의 접시를 쓰다가 돌아가신 것처럼, 재수 없는 그릇은 피해야 한다 .
이빨이 나간 그릇이나 칼자루 같은 무늬의 그릇은 쓰지 말아야 한다 .
남편, 아내, 자식들의 밥그릇은 좋은 것으로 바꿔주고, 무늬가 복이 있어야 한다 .

3. 통합의 시대와 허경영의 중산주의
   현재 시대는 통합의 시대이며, 허경영의 중산주의가 전 세계를 이끌어갈 새로운 진리임을 설명한다.

3.1. 통합의 시대와 정치인들의 문제점
융합, 통합, 화합의 시대: 현재는 해인 시대이자, 융합, 통합, 화합의 시대이다 .
통합의 3대 요소: 연합, 집합, 결합이다 .
융합의 3대 요소: 혼합, 용해, 발효이다 .
화합의 3대 요소: 양보, 소통, 박이다 .
정치인들의 시대착오적 행태: 안철수는 샌더스를 따라 주먹을 쥐고 싸우겠다는 제스처를 취한다 .
이는 통합의 시대에 맞지 않는 행동이며, 싸움의 대상은 자기 자신뿐이다 .
허경영은 자신의 공약과 싸우며, 여야의 공약과 싸우지 않는다 .
허경영의 공약은 남북한 모두가 따라 하고 있으며, 동경 표준시 30분 당기기 공약은 북한이 먼저 따라 했다 .
정치인들은 실제 경험 없이 대학에서 박사 학위만 받은 자들이며, 이들이 나라를 이끌어가는 것이 문제이다 .
야당이 둘로 쪼개진 것도 허경영을 대통령으로 만들기 위한 것일 수 있다 .

3.2. 국제 정세와 허경영의 중산주의
미국 대선이 한국에 미치는 영향: 미국은 한국을 누르는 형국이며, 미국 대통령이 누가 되느냐에 따라 한국 경제에 큰 영향을 미친다 .
힐러리가 대통령이 되면 한반도 전쟁이 날 수 있다 .
샌더스가 대통령이 되면 미국의 패권이 약해지고, 미국 달러 가치가 떨어져 한국 경제도 망할 수 있다 .
미국의 급진주의는 미국을 위험하게 할 수 있지만, 인기는 좋다 .
허경영의 중산주의: 무국경, 무차별, 무정파를 지향하며, 전 세계를 통일하는 진리이다 .
미국의 민주주의와 자본주의는 100살 노인처럼 폐기 처분할 때가 되었으며, 중산주의가 세계를 이끌어갈 것이다 .
미국의 자본주의는 1%의 상류층이 99%의 돈을 가지게 만들었으며, 미국 국민은 돈의 노예가 되었다 .
한국은 미국과의 무역 수지는 흑자이지만, 경상 수지는 적자이며, 이는 미국이 로열티를 많이 받아가기 때문이다 .
미국은 지식 산업으로 세계 경제를 장악하고 있으며, 전 세계 천재들을 장학금으로 유치하여 특허권을 통해 돈을 벌어간다 .
샌더스의 주장처럼 민주주의와 자본주의는 중산주의로 수정될 때가 왔지만, 미국은 국수주의를 포기하기 어렵다 .
허경영의 중산주의는 이러한 문제들을 해결하고 새로운 시대를 열어갈 것이다

제1장 세계 정치와 대한민국의 미래

1.1. 미국 대선 주자들의 정책 분석
미국 대선 주자들의 정책은 세계 정세에 지대한 영향을 미친다. 특히 힐러리와 샌더스의 정책은 미국의 정통성과 미래를 결정하는 중요한 요소이다.

힐러리의 국수주의 정책: 힐러리의 정책은 미국의 정통성을 유지하는 국수주의적 성격을 띤다 . 이러한 정책이 미국을 현재의 위치에 있게 한 근간이다 .

샌더스의 급진주의 정책: 샌더스는 미국을 중국보다 더 급진적인 방향으로 이끌려 한다 .

샌더스의 정책은 월가 해체, 대형 은행 폐지 등을 주장하며 이는 미국의 자본이 홍콩으로 유출되어 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 만들 수 있다 .

이러한 급진주의는 미국의 기득권을 포기하는 것과 같으며, 미국 달러 가치 하락과 경제 붕괴로 이어질 수 있다 .

샌더스의 정책은 미국의 현실에 부합하지 않아 문제가 발생할 수 있다 .

1.2. 미국의 간접 선거 제도와 그 영향
미국은 간접 선거를 통해 대통령을 선출한다 . 이는 한국의 직접 선거와 대비된다 .

선거인단 제도: 미국은 3억 인구 중 538명의 선거인단을 뽑아 대통령을 선출한다 . 대통령이 되기 위해서는 270명(절반 이상)의 선거인단을 확보해야 한다 .

선거인단의 구성과 보수 세력: 선거인단은 주로 미국의 보수 세력, 즉 자본가, 금융가, 군수 산업가들로 구성된다 . 이들은 미국의 정체성을 지키기 위해 흑인 대통령의 당선을 막으려 간접 선거 제도를 만들었다 .

오바마 전 대통령은 어머니가 백인이었기에 대통령이 될 수 있었다 .

샌더스의 한계: 샌더스가 아무리 많은 대중적 지지를 얻어도, 선거인단의 지지를 받지 못하면 대통령이 될 수 없다 .

1.3. 한국 정치인들의 문제점
한국의 정치인들은 미국의 정책이나 다른 정치인의 공약을 모방하는 경향이 있다 .

안철수의 사대주의: 안철수는 샌더스를 닮았다고 주장하며 미국의 급진주의 정책을 모방하려 한다 . 이는 미국의 달러 가치를 하락시키고 세계 주도권을 포기하게 만드는 위험한 발상이다 .

안철수는 국회의원 수를 100명으로 줄이겠다는 허경영 선생의 25년 전 공약을 모방하기도 했다 .

안철수는 1%의 상류층 기득권자로서 서민을 대변하기 어렵다 .

김무성의 보수주의: 김무성은 인구 증가를 위해 조선족 이민을 주장하거나 중산층의 투표를 막아 선거에서 이기려 하는 등 안일한 보수주의적 정책을 펼친다 .

문재인의 표방주의: 문재인은 허경영 선생의 노인 수당 공약을 모방하여 70% 노인에게 20만원씩 지급하겠다고 주장한다 .

이는 노인들을 기만하는 행위이며, 실제 생활에 도움이 되지 않는 정책이다 .

허경영 선생은 25년 전부터 노인 수당 70만원을 주장해왔다 .

1.4. 허경영의 중산주의와 정책
허경영 선생의 중산주의는 기존 정치인들의 정책과 차별화된다 .

부자 존중과 분배: 허경영 선생은 월가 해체나 대형 은행 폐지를 주장하지 않는다 . 부자를 존경받는 사회로 만들고, 없는 사람에게 제대로 분배하여 부자가 존경받도록 하는 정책을 지향한다 .

재정 확보 방안: 허경영 선생은 직불 카드 의무 사용을 통해 세금 탈루를 막고 연간 100조 원의 세수를 확보할 수 있다고 말한다 . 이를 통해 노인 수당 70만원을 지급하고도 연간 200조 원이 남는다고 주장한다 .

무국경, 무차별, 무정파: 허경영의 중산주의는 국경, 차별, 정파를 초월하여 전 세계를 통일하는 진리이다 . 이는 미국의 자본주의와 민주주의가 100살 노인이 되어 폐기 처분될 시점에 세계를 이끌어갈 새로운 패러다임이다 .

제2장 인물 관상론과 운명

2.1. 정치인들의 관상과 사주
강연자는 정치인들의 관상과 사주를 통해 그들의 운명과 정책의 방향을 예측한다.

안철수와 전업 사주: 안철수는 ‘전업 사주’를 가지고 태어났다 .

전업 사주는 직업을 자주 바꾸는 사주를 의미한다 . 안철수는 의사, CEO, 교수, 정치인 등 직업을 계속 옮겨왔다 .

그러나 안철수는 직업을 바꿀수록 인기가 떨어지는 ‘내려가는 전업 사주’이다 .

안철수의 관상은 ‘염소상’으로, 염소는 전업을 자주 하면 좋지 않다 .

샌더스와 평행 사주: 샌더스는 ‘평행 사주’를 가지고 태어났다 .

평행 사주는 한 직업을 꾸준히 유지하는 사주를 의미한다 . 샌더스는 30년간 정치인의 길을 걸어왔다 .

샌더스의 관상은 ‘목이 긴 독수리상’으로, 미국의 상징물인 독수리와 일치한다 .

신영균과 올라가는 전업 사주: 신영균은 안철수와 같은 전업 사주이지만, 직업을 바꿀수록 성공하는 ‘올라가는 전업 사주’이다 .

치과 의사에서 배우, 사업가, 정치인, 방송인으로 직업을 바꾸며 계속 성공했다 .

힐러리의 관상: 힐러리는 ‘공작상’으로, 당돌하고 진실성이 있는 것이 특징이다 . 그러나 너무 당돌한 모습이 대중에게는 마이너스로 작용할 수 있다 .

문재인의 관상: 문재인은 ‘소상’으로, 소는 여러 역할을 수행하며 직업을 바꾸는 것이 괜찮다 .

김무성의 관상: 김무성은 ‘이무기상’이다 .

유승민의 관상: 유승민은 ‘쥐상’ 또는 ‘고양이상’으로, 마음에 안 들면 할퀴는 성향이 있다 .

박원순의 관상: 박원순은 ‘염소상’으로, 안철수와 관상이 비슷하여 사이가 좋고 안철수가 박원순에게 양보한 이유가 된다 .

2.2. 관상과 운명의 중요성
관상과 사주는 개인의 운명뿐만 아니라 국가의 운명에도 영향을 미친다 .

그릇의 중요성: 유경수 여사가 총구 모양의 접시를 사용하다가 서거한 사례처럼, 사용하는 물건의 형태도 운명에 영향을 줄 수 있다 .

긍정적인 관상의 영향: 레이건 대통령처럼 웃음이 나오는 관상은 대중에게 호감을 주어 성공적인 리더십을 발휘하는 데 도움이 된다 .

과거와 현재의 운명: 2016년까지의 과거는 바꿀 수 없지만 오늘 이후의 운명은 자신의 마음먹기에 달려 있다 . 허경영 선생의 가르침을 통해 운명을 바꿀 수 있는 기회가 주어진다 .

제3장 허경영의 시대적 사명

3.1. 언어도단 시대의 도래
강연자는 현재 시대를 ‘언어도단(言路途斷)’의 시대로 규정한다 .

진리의 부재: 말, 경전, 진리, 도가 통하지 않는 시대이다 .

사회 변화의 징후: 여성들이 길거리에서 담배를 피우고 비행기와 인공위성이 날아다니는 시대 .

3.2. 신언서판(身言書判)을 갖춘 자
언어도단 시대에 ‘신언서판’을 갖춘 자가 나타난다고 말한다 .

신언서판의 의미: 얼굴이 잘생기고, 말을 잘하며, 글을 잘 쓰고, 판단력이 뛰어난 사람을 의미한다 .

허경영 선생의 신언서판: 허경영 선생은 30년 전부터 제시한 공약들이 다른 정치인들에게 모방될 정도로 뛰어난 판단력을 가졌으며 영어와 한문으로도 강의할 수 있는 언변을 갖추었다 .

3.3. 허경영의 출현과 사명
허경영 선생은 하늘에서 허락받은 권능을 가지고 이 시대에 나타났다 .

오시(午時)의 양기: 임금이나 석가모니가 밥을 먹는 오시(11시~1시)는 태양의 기운이 가장 강한 시간이다 . 허경영 선생은 이 오시에 말씀을 가져온 자이다 .

허(許)자의 의미: ‘허(許)’자는 십자가 위에 있는 하나님과 시방 세계 위에 있는 부처의 말을 가져온 자를 의미하며 ‘윤허(允許)’, ‘허락(許諾)’과 같이 권력을 허락받았다는 뜻을 내포한다 .

공전멸병(空錢滅兵)의 예언: 옛 예언서에 나오는 ‘공전멸병’은 ‘돈을 들고 있는 병사를 멸하라’는 뜻으로, 김씨 성을 가진 자들을 비우면 허씨가 남는다는 암호이다 . 이는 허경영 선생의 출현을 예고하는 것이다.

벼락 같은 등장: 허경영 선생은 대통령이 될 때 갑자기 벼락처럼 나타나 인기를 얻을 것이며 과거 대선에서도 밤 12시에 한 번의 TV 토론만으로 엄청난 인기를 얻었다 .

제4장 세계 정세와 대한민국의 위치

4.1. 오행으로 본 세계 정세
강연자는 오행(五行)을 통해 세계 주요 국가들의 관계와 대한민국의 위치를 설명한다.

미국 (목, 木): 미국은 ‘목(木)’에 해당하며, 대한민국(토, 土)을 누르는 형국이다 .

미국은 한반도를 지배하고 있으며, 북한이 핵을 개발해도 미국 항공모함 앞에서는 꼼짝할 수 없다 .

미국 대통령의 선택은 한반도에 큰 영향을 미친다 . 힐러리 같은 패권주의자는 한반도 전쟁을 유발할 수 있고 샌더스 같은 급진주의자는 미국 경제를 몰락시켜 한국 경제에도 악영향을 줄 수 있다 .

중국 (금, 金): 중국은 ‘금(金)’에 해당하며, 대한민국(토, 土)과 ‘토생금(土生金)’의 관계를 맺어 서로 돕는 관계이다 .

일본 (화, 火): 일본은 ‘화(火)’에 해당하며, 대한민국(토, 土)을 돕는 관계이다 . 박정희 대통령 시절 일본에서 6억 달러를 가져와 한국 경제를 살린 사례가 있다 .

러시아 (수, 水): 러시아는 ‘수(水)’에 해당하며, 대한민국(토, 土)이 러시아를 누르는 형국이다 . 따라서 러시아에 속지 말고 미국을 믿지 말아야 한다 .

4.2. 미국의 지식 산업 지배와 한국 교육의 문제점
미국은 지식 산업을 통해 전 세계 경제를 장악하고 있다 .

로열티 수입: 미국은 전 세계에 자국의 브랜드와 기술을 보급하고 로열티를 받아 막대한 수입을 올린다 .

인재 유치: 전 세계의 천재들에게 장학금을 지급하여 미국인으로 만들고, 이들을 통해 특허권을 확보하여 지식 산업을 주도한다 .

한국 교육의 문제: 한국 대학들은 이러한 지식 산업을 주도하지 못하고 있으며, 이는 교육 시스템의 문제에서 비롯된다 .

1. 세계 정치 지도자들의 정책 분석과 미국의 간접 선거 제도

대선 후보들에 대해 이야기하며, 세계 정치인들의 정책 문제점을 짚어보고자 합니다. 특히 미국의 대선 주자들과 세계 정세에 대해 말씀드리겠습니다. 힐러리의 공약은 전반적으로 인기가 있습니다. 미국이라는 나라는 정통성이 중요하며, 중국보다 더 급진적인 샌더스의 정책은 문제가 있습니다. 샌더스가 인기가 많다고 해서 그 정책이 괜찮다고 볼 수 없습니다. 샌더스의 급진주의는 미국의 민주당 좌파보다 더 좌측으로 치우쳐 있으며, 이는 중국보다 더 좌파적인 정책입니다. 힐러리와 같은 국수주의 정책이 미국을 지탱해 온 근간입니다. 만약 샌더스처럼 월가를 없애고 대형 은행을 해체하는 정책을 쓴다면, 미국의 돈은 홍콩으로 빠져나가 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 될 것입니다. 이는 미국이 기득권을 포기하겠다는 것과 같습니다.

미국은 간접 선거로 대통령을 뽑습니다. 한국은 직접 선거로 대통령을 뽑으므로, 민주주의 측면에서는 한국이 미국보다 약 100년 앞서 있습니다. 미국은 박정희 대통령 시절의 통일주체 대의원회와 같은 간접 선거 제도를 유지하고 있습니다. 3억 명의 미국 국민이 538명의 선거인단을 뽑고, 이 선거인단이 대통령을 선출합니다. 대통령이 되려면 270명 이상의 선거인단을 확보해야 합니다. 지난 대선에서 부시 대통령과 고어 대통령이 각각 269명씩 동수를 기록한 적이 있습니다. 당시 고어 후보가 수백만 표 더 많았음에도 불구하고, 선거인단 수에서 동률을 이루었습니다. 샌더스가 아무리 많은 표를 얻어도 선거인단을 많이 확보하지 못하면 대통령이 될 수 없습니다. 선거인단은 미국의 보수 세력, 즉 자본가, 금융가, 군수 산업가들이 장악하고 있습니다. 이들은 흑인이 대통령이 되는 것을 막기 위해 간접 선거 제도를 만들었으며, 선거인단 대부분이 백인입니다. 오바마 대통령은 어머니가 백인이었기 때문에 대통령이 될 수 있었지만, 순수 흑인은 대통령이 되기 어려운 구조입니다.

2. 샌더스 정책의 위험성과 안철수의 사대주의 비판
   샌더스가 월가를 해체하면 미국의 모든 돈이 홍콩으로 도피하여 미국은 종이 호랑이가 될 것입니다. 이는 미국 달러 가치 하락으로 이어져 미국 경제가 망할 수 있습니다. 서민을 돕겠다는 명분으로 힐러리의 국수주의를 무너뜨리는 것은 위험합니다. 안철수 후보가 샌더스를 닮았다고 말하는 것은 사대주의적 발상입니다.

3. 허경영의 정책 철학과 기존 정치인들의 모방 비판
   허경영의 정책은 월가를 해체하거나 대형 은행을 없애는 것이 아닙니다. 부자들이 존경받는 사회를 만들고, 없는 사람들에게 제대로 분배하여 부자가 존경받도록 하자는 것입니다. 부자들의 세금을 무조건 뺏는 것이 아니라, 제대로 거두고 깎아주지 않는 것이 중요합니다.

4. 한국 정치인들의 문제점: 분파주의, 보수주의, 표방주의
   안철수 후보는 국회의원 수를 100명으로 줄이겠다는 허경영의 25년 전 공약을 모방했습니다. 안철수 후보는 정치 경력이 짧아 허경영의 공약을 표방하는 것에 불과합니다. 안철수 후보의 분파주의는 야당을 불리하게 만들고 있습니다. 1%의 상류층인 안철수 후보가 노동자 서민을 대변하는 것은 모순입니다.

김무성 새누리당 대표의 보수주의는 인구 증가를 위해 조선족을 데려와야 한다거나, 중산층이 투표하지 않도록 하는 것이 선거 승리의 관건이라는 발언에서 드러납니다. 이는 안일한 생각이며, 돈이 없어 결혼하지 못하는 현실을 외면한 정책입니다.

문재인 후보는 허경영의 노인 수당 공약을 모방했습니다. 허경영은 25년 전부터 노인 수당 70만 원을 주장했지만, 문재인 후보는 70% 노인에게 20만 원을 주겠다고 합니다. 이는 노인들을 기만하는 행위이며, 국회의원들이 자신들의 월급을 반납하고 제대로 된 정책을 펼쳐야 합니다. 선거가 끝나면 공약이 축소되는 현실을 비판하며, 허경영은 대통령이 되면 그렇게 하지 않을 것이라고 강조합니다.

5. 허경영의 재정 정책: 직불 카드 의무화와 세금 탈루 방지
   허경영은 돈 100조의 예산을 늘리기 위해 미국처럼 직불 카드 사용을 의무화하여 모든 결제 기록을 남길 것입니다. 이를 통해 연간 100조 원의 세금 탈루를 막고, 노인 수당 70만 원을 지급하고도 200조 원이 남을 것이라고 주장합니다. 현재 정치인들이 국민을 속이고 있다고 비판합니다.

6. 정치인들의 관상 분석: 힐러리, 샌더스, 안철수, 문재인, 김무성
   정치인들의 관상을 통해 그들의 특징과 미래를 예측합니다.

힐러리: 공작상으로, 당돌하고 진실성이 있습니다. 그러나 너무 당당한 모습이 대중에게는 마이너스로 작용할 수 있습니다.

샌더스: 목이 긴 독수리상으로, 진정성과 참신성이 있습니다. 젊은 사람들이 좋아하는 이유입니다.

안철수: 염소상으로, 직업을 자주 바꾸는 전업 사주를 가지고 있습니다. 직업을 바꿀수록 인기가 떨어지는 유형입니다.

문재인: 소상으로, 변호사, 비서실장, 당 대표, 대통령 후보 등 다양한 직업을 가졌지만, 소처럼 묵묵히 일하는 유형입니다.

김무성: 이무기상입니다.

이러한 관상 분석을 통해 누가 대통령이 될지 예측할 수 있다고 말합니다.

7. 전업 사주와 평행 사주: 안철수와 신영균의 비교
   안철수는 전업 사주를 가지고 태어났습니다. 전업 사주는 직업을 계속 옮기는 사주이며, 옮길수록 성공하는 사람과 망하는 사람이 있습니다. 안철수는 직업을 옮길수록 인기가 떨어지는 유형입니다. 반면 신영균은 같은 전업 사주라도 치과 의사에서 배우, 사업가, 정치인, 방송인으로 직업을 바꿀수록 성공했습니다. 샌더스는 평생 정치만 하는 평행 사주를 가지고 있습니다.

8. 대한민국 정치의 문제점과 허경영의 역할
   대한민국 국회의원들은 변호사, 검사, 형사 등 다양한 직업을 거쳐 국회의원이 되는 경우가 많습니다. 허경영은 이러한 정치인들을 지켜보고 있으며, 자신의 말을 듣지 않는 정치인들은 사라지게 할 수 있는 에너지를 가지고 있다고 주장합니다.

9. 운명과 과거, 그리고 허경영의 가르침
   2016년까지의 과거는 바꿀 수 없지만, 오늘 이후의 운명은 자신의 마음으로 바꿀 수 있습니다. 과거를 원망하지 말고, 허경영의 가르침을 통해 운명을 바꿀 수 있다고 강조합니다. 대한민국 국민의 마음이 미래를 결정하며, 현재 1%의 상류층이 부의 99%를 독점하는 미국과 같은 상황이 한국에서도 벌어지고 있다고 경고합니다.

10. 정치인들의 동물상 비유와 그 의미
    힐러리: 공작상

안철수: 염소상

샌더스: 독수리상

문재인: 소상

김무성: 이무기상

유승민: 쥐상, 고양이상

박원순은 염소상으로 안철수와 사이가 좋다고 말합니다. 염소나 양은 직업을 자주 바꾸면 좋지 않지만, 소는 다양한 역할을 할 수 있어 직업을 바꾸는 것이 괜찮다고 설명합니다. 이러한 동물상 비유를 통해 미국 대통령이 누가 될지 예측할 수 있다고 말합니다.

11. 해인 시대와 신원서판(身言書判)
    현재는 인터넷 시대인 해인 시대이며, 말과 경전, 진리가 통하지 않는 언어도단 시대입니다. 이 시대에는 얼굴 잘생기고 말 잘하며 글 잘 쓰고 판단력이 뛰어난 신원서판을 갖춘 자가 나타난다고 예언합니다. 허경영은 30년 전부터 내놓은 공약들이 여야 정치인들에게 모방되고 있으며, 이는 허경영이 신원서판을 갖춘 자임을 증명한다.

12. 허경영의 중산주의와 세계 통일
    허경영의 중산주의는 무국경, 무차별, 무정파를 지향하며, 전 세계를 통일할 진리입니다. 미국의 민주주의와 자본주의는 100살 노인과 같아 폐기 처분할 때가 되었으며, 1%의 상류층이 부의 대부분을 독점하는 문제를 해결할 수 없습니다. 중산주의가 세계를 이끌어갈 것이라고 말합니다.

13. 미국의 경제 지배와 한국의 현실
    미국은 지식 산업을 통해 전 세계 경제를 장악하고 있으며, 한국은 미국에 로열티를 많이 지불하고 있습니다. 미국 대학들은 많은 특허권을 가지고 있지만, 한국 대학은 그렇지 못합니다. 샌더스의 급진적인 정책은 미국을 위험하게 할 수 있으며, 미국은 국수주의를 포기하기 어려운 나라입니다.

스크립트

대선 후보에 대해서도 이야기하지만은 또 세계 미국의 어 지금 대선 주자들 좀 가능성이 있는 사람 뭐 그런 사람들에 대해서 좀 이야기를 하고 그다음에 세계 정치인들의 정책 정책이 얼마나 문제가 있는가 내가 짚어드리고 어 우리나라가 지금 앞으로 내년부터는 어음 병신년이니까 어 세계 정세에 대해서 말씀을 좀 드릴게요. 힐 어 힐러리는 어 공략이에 전반적으로 어 인리가 있어요. 그까 미국에 미국이란 나라는 정통성이 있어야 돼. 미국을 중국보다 더 급진적으로 몰고 가는 샌더서는 문제가 있는 거예요.

그 여러분들은 샌더서가 인기가 올라가니까 아 그 사람이 뭐 괜찮다. 하지만은 샌더서는 급진주의는 미국의 민주당의 자파보다도 더 자쪽으로 끌고 가는데 저렇게 되면 중국보다도 더 자파가 되는 거야. 무슨 말이냐면 미국은 그 힐러리와 같은 그런 정책 그러니까 국수주의 저 정책 때문에 미국이 있는 거예요. 만약에 샌드선 같이 해 버리면이 샌드선 같은 정책을 쓰면은 미국의 월가를 없애겠다.

대형 은행을 없애겠다. 이런 샌더스 같은 정책을 쓰면 미국의 돈이 홍콩으로 다가 버려요. 그럼 중국이 세계 경제를 지배하게 돼요. 미국 월가의 모든 월가를 해체하였다는 거야.

그렇죠? 그러면 제2에 거기가 공산주의가 되고 중국이 민주주의가 되는 거예요. 그러니까 미국이 기도권을 포기하겠다는 소리와 같아서 미국은 여러분이 잘 알지만은 대통령을 누가 뽑죠? 미국이란 나라는 간접 선거를 대통령으로 뽑아요. 간접 선거. 한국은 뭘 뽑죠? 한국은 직접 선거로 뽑아.

그러니까 민주주의가 누가 앞섰죠? 우리가 우리가 훨씬 앞서 있는 거예요. 우리가 한 100년 앞서 있는 거야. 미국보다 그런데 미국은 박정희 대통령이 하던 그 통일주체 대의원을 하고 있는 거예요, 지금. 간접.

그러니까 선거인단을 몇 명을 뽑아요? 미국의 3억명이 58명. 538명을 뽑아. 그러면 몇 명이 붙어야 돼요? 절반을 유지할. 절반이 몇 명이에요? 응? 269.

269명을 받으면 두 사람 269명이면 절반이죠. 예. 그러니까 230명을 받아야 대통령이 되는 거예요. 그런데 지난번에 부시 대통령과고 대통령이 269명씩 받았어.

맞아 안 맞아요? 예. 269명식을 동수로 받은 거야. 표는 고가 훨씬 표는 예. 몇백만 표가 많았어.

몇백만이 많았단 말이야. 그러니까 미국에는 아무리 샌드서가 표를 힐러리에 더블로 받아도 힐러리 지지율보다는 지지율이 높아요. 그거는 전체 3억의 지지율이야. 이 3억의 지주율이 아무리 높아도 선거인단은 많이 가질 많이 가져갈 수 있나요? 어, 그렇지 않아요.

그러니까 선거인단이 샌드스를 찍어야 되는 거예요. 음. 근데 그 선거인단이 미국의 보수 세력들이 그 진을 치고 있단 말이야. 그 사람들이 미국의 자본인가요? 미국의 금융인가요? 미국의 군수 산업가들이야.

그니까 미국이라는 나라를 지키려니까이 사람들은 흑인이 대통령 되는 걸 맡기 위해서 선거 인단을 한 거예요. 간접 선거. 어, 간접 선거를 만들어 놔 가지고 전부 선거인단이 백인이었어. 그래서 백인이 미국을 지키겠다 이래 가지고 간접 선거를 해 놨는데 오바마는 흑인이라도 누가 자기 어머니가 백인 맞죠.

그래 오바마는 대통령이 될 수 있었던 거야. 흑인표도 없고 백인 표도 없고. 예. 그래 돼 있지만은 허인은 절대 대통령 할 수 없게끔 미국이 그렇게 돼 있어요.

선거인단이 전부 백인이야. 그래서 미국이란 나라가이 간접 선거 아주 옛날부터 미국은 대통령을 3억 명이 대통령을 300 538명을 뽑아 가지고 538명이 다시 대통령을 요렇게 뽑아요. 알겠죠? 그러니까이 선거 인단만 가서 대통령이 잡으면 되는 거야. 예.

예. 그 선거 인단을 누가 많이 확보하느냐. 그런데이 샌더서가 막 인기가 좋아 표를 안만 받아도 모랄레스나 대한민국은 허행이가 인기 좋으면 대통령이 되는데 미국은 아무리 인기가 좋아도 대통령이 될 수가 없다. 어 알겠죠? 그래서 그걸 우리가 알아야 되고 그래서이 사람이 하는 거는 월가를 해체한다.

그 미국의 월가를 해치하면 미국에 있는 모든 돈이 어디로 가죠? 홍콩으로 가서 돈을 벌기 위해서 다 도망가 버려. 다 도망가 버려. 그럼 미국은 종이 호랑이가 돼 버려요. 그러까이 사람은 샌더스는 미국을 종이 호랑이 만들어 놓으면 어떻게 돼? 미국 달러 가치가 하락해 버려요.

달러 가치가 하락하면 미국은 경제가 망하는 거예요. 서민들 도와주려다가 미국이라는 나라의 그 힐러리의 국수주의 이것은 하루 아침에 무너지는 거예요. 그래서 미국은 그렇게 간단한 나라가 아닌데 안철수라는 사람이 사대주의 미국 대통령 후보로 넘더서가 자기가 샌더스를 닮았다. 이런 말을 하는 거는 사대주의 발상이에요.

맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 맞아, 안 맞아요? 이제 병신년이 오니까 여러분들의 박수 소리도 불아야 돼. 병신은 불 맞죠? 네. 불은 무슨 불이죠? 이게 불은 이게 무슨 불이에요? 이게 무슨 불이죠? 적불 진 진태양이야. 진태양 그래요.

이게 태양불이란 말이야. 응. 그러 허경령은 무슨 무슨 태양이라고요? 응.태양 본태양. 본신 본태양 천북경에 나오죠.

예. 본신 본태양. 진태양은 여러분들의이 식물이나 인간들의 생명을 자주자 하는 거고 본태양한 인간들의 영혼을 자지우자 하는 에너지란 말이야. 그러니까 내가 여러분들이 지구에 70억이 있고 전 우주의 언에 그 많은 사람이 있어도 허경령의 에너지와 닮은 사람은 한백거 없어.

나구는 전부 반대야. 허경령 부르면 손이 안 떨어지지. 허경영 사진 보면 손이 안 떨어지지. 그건 기계를 해도 테스트해도 마찬가지야.

그 에너지가 엄청나게 오는데 여러분들은 진태양이 진태양의 에너지를 안 받으면 못 살아요. 예. 그러면 본태양은 왜 왔느냐?이 진태양의 에너지의 본태양 에너지가 라되면은이 시점이 지구의 궤도 수정이 오는 시점이야.이 계도가 수정되는 시점에 내가 나타난 거예요. 알겠죠? 그래서 나중에 엄청난 돌림병이 돌 때 허경 부른 사람과 안 부른 사람은 하늘과 땅이야.

그게 옵니다. 그래서 나는이 강의하러 온 사람이 아니에요. 하늘에서 여러분들에게 내 이름 불러라고 알려주러 온 거야. 예.

알겠죠? 그런데 여러분들이 재미가 있어야 내 말을들을 거 아니야. 그 나와서 내 이름만 불러라 그러면 누가 내 말을 듣겠어요? 그러니까 강의도 해 주는 거야. 야,이 강의를 들어보니까 저 사람은 지상에서 온 사람이 아니야. 이게 입정이 돼야 돼.

그래. 이걸 수천번 기록을 유튜브로 남길 거야.이 지상에. 그래 놓고 내가 가면은 수이 인류가 언제나 내 경제는 영상을 볼 수가 있어요. 없어요? 있어요.

예. 조금 전에 나한테 전화가 많이 와서 산에 산에서 등산을 하는데 허경령 유튜브를 보고 내려오다가 자빠질 뻔 했대. [웃음] 그런데 허경령 유튜버가 아니고 다른 유튜브 봤으면 곤두박질 했을 거래. 어 그러면서 지금 허총장님한테 전화를 하는 거래.

아 유튜버보다가 자빠질 뻔 했는데 안 안 넘어졌다는 거야. 그래 지금 앉아 가지고 유튜버 보고 있대. 산에서 산에 등산한 사람이 예. 그러니까 110회를 보고 있대 지금.

어, 산에서 110회가 오늘 몇야? 아, 저 10회를 보고 있대. 전회를 보고 있는 중이라고 전화가 왔어요. 예. 그러니까 내 유튜브 보는 사람이 엄청 많아요.

알겠죠? 그래서이 우리 한국은 직접 선거인데 한국의 대근 후보가 미국의 대권 후보가 흉내를 내면 됩니까? 안 되죠. 안 되죠. 네. 우리나라 사람이 세 개의 중심이에요.

근데 우리나라 사람이 우리나라 마늘은 미국의 마늘을 못 먹어요. 우리나라에다가 인삼을 심으면 인삼 맛이 나는데 미국에다 심으면 무이 나요? 그건 땅이 아니야. 땅이 그 사람들은 몸에 나쁜 거만 먹어. 그래 우리가 그 병을 많이 안았어.

미국의 잘못으로 우리가 엄청난 피해를 봤어. 왜? 빵. 그거 먹으면 큰일하는 거예요. 사실은 별로 좋은게 아니야.

그리고 그 사람들은 돼지고기를 튀겨 가지고 먹어. 그 베이콘이라 그래. 그거는 바람물질의 1호야. 빵 먹고 베이컨 먹어요.

햄버거 먹으면 그냥 바람 물질의 1호야. 햄버거만 먹어요. 그러니까 뭐 햄버거 장사가 또 나한테 뭘 하겠네. 우리나라 햄버거는 좀 괜찮을 거야.

응. 그런데 미국의 사람들은 나쁜 것만 골라먹어. 어, 강냉이 튀긴 거 그거 극장에서 여러분 한봉쟁이 먹잖아. 그러면 여러분 내 혈관이 다 막혀 버리는 거예요.

그거 20명 20인분이야. 이은 큰봉투가. 그걸 둘이서 먹어. 그러면 그 사람의 피 속에이 혈관을 온고시키는 그 물질이 그 무슨 지방입니까? 트랜스 지방.

트랜스 지방이 20인분이 들어가는 거야. 근데 그걸 이만한 본기 가능하면 두 시간 영화 봐야 되니까 큰 거 사 가지고 앉아 가지고 그걸 아무렇지 않게 먹고 있는 거야이 남녀들이. 그러니까 나중에 남자들 피니스가 안 쓰지. 애를 못 낳지.

여자들은 애를 못 낳. 전부 불구자야. 장각을 생각이 안 나 안 나요. 음.

대한민국 문교부 대한민국의 장관들 도대체 뭐 하는 사람들인지 내 모르겠어. 국민들. 그 사람들은 무조건 코카콜라야. 그냥 나쁜 거를 나쁜 식문화를 전 세계에 공급하고 있어요.

자기가 뺨에다가 코카콜라에다가 베이컨에다가 아 그래 안 그래요? 그냥 햄버거에다가 그 사람들 음식은 먹었다면 우리나라 사람은 절단하는 음식이야 전부 그러니까 우리 국민이 미국이라는 것을 함부로 본보면 큰일 나요. 근데 안철수는 뭘 본니까? 아,이 사람은이 사람은 말이야. 급진주의야. 미국의 달러 가치를 하락시키고 미국의 세계 주도권을 포기하겠다는 거예요.

음. 그러니까 저 사람이 여러분 보기는 잘하는 거 같죠. 허경령의 정책은 저렇지 않아요. 허경령은 월가를 해체한다.

대형 은행을 없했다. 이런 말 합니까? 아멘. 안 합니다. 부자는 부자들을 존경받는 사회 없는 사람에게 제대로 분배해 가지고 부자가 존경받게 해주자 해 주겠다는 거지.

부작권 무조건 뺏겠다는게 아니야. 근데 샌더스는 부자세를 만들겠다. 지금 먹기는 세금만 해도 부자들의 세금은 엄청나요. 근데 그 세금을 깎아 주니까 문제야.

정치인들이 깎아 주지 않고 제대로만 거두면 되고 그거를 어 우리 하는 정책은 부자들에 대해서 하는이 안철수의 사대주의에 대해서는 내가 이렇게 보면은에 참 우리나라 사람들이 기가 막혀. 내가 국회원을 100명으로 줄이겠다 그랬더니 안철수가 국회원을 100명으로 줄르겠대 그때. 그랬어 안 그랬어요? 나는 25년 전에 이야기한 정치 인생 30년이 된 사람인데 그 사람은 정치 인생이 몇 년 안 돼서 그래요. 그냥 무조건 조금만 있으면 표방하는 거예.

먼저 어디 갔어요? 분파주의 아니 안철수가 나가면은 그걸 얼마든지 좋다. 그래 전당대 하자. 포용할 수 있어요? 없어요. 응.

그 사람을 어 어떻게든 분파를 없애야 되는게 당 대표인데 분파가 만들어져 가지고 지금 야당이 상당히 불리하게 돼 있잖아. 그래 안 그래요? 그까 이런 정치를 보면은 이런 분파주의나 사대주의 이런 사람들이 정치권에 정치를 개혁한다. 여러분 믿습니까? 믿음이 갑니까? 아니다. 그리고 1%의 상류층이 안 철수예요.

그 사람이 주목을지면 뭐 하자는 거예요? 노동자 서민들이 주목을 질 판인데 아 1%의 기도권이 주목을 집어야 뭐 합니까? 그래. 안 그래요? 그렇습니다. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 아니 재산 2천억이 넘는 1% 상유청이 주목을 지면은 우리 국민은 막 졸도해야 되겠네. 전부.

그래. 그래요. 네. 아니, 이자도 못 내고 월세도 못 내고 전기도 못 내고 이런 사람들이 수한데.

어, 그 사람들은 주목을 안고 앉아 있는데 지금 참고 있는데 예. 그 사람이 그 사람들을 대변한다고요? 재벌이. 어, 우리 국민은에에 그런데 속지 않습니다. 음.

그래. 또 김무성 새누리당 대표는이 뭡니까? 보수주의. 아, 보수주의도 어느 정도로 해야지 인구가 증거 안 하니까 출산율을 높이려면 조선종을 데려와야 된대. [웃음] 그 내가 어, 인간을 비판을 안 합니다.

그 정책을 지금 비판하는 거야. 그 얼굴은 괜찮은 사람 안철수도 착하게 생기고 김어 김무성 씨도 뭐 다 착하게 생긴 분들인데 그 정책은 전부 내 거만 따라하는 거야. 내 거만 그 출산 정책을 따라하려면 내체 3천만 원씩 줘야 될 거 아니야. 그래 안 그래요? 어 결혼한테 1억씩 줘야 될 거 아니야.

아직까지는 여야가 따라하지 않는 거 한 가지가 있죠. 뭐죠? 결혼하면 1억 결혼하면 1억 결혼하면 1억 결혼하면 1억다는 그때 내가 대통령이 되는 때야. [웃음] 왜냐면 전국민이 뒤집어져 버려. 응.

저 사람들은 끝까지 허경연거를 모방해 가지고 정치하는구나. 그 모방하려면 제대로 해야지. 또 이번에 문재인은 또 뭐라 그러냐면은이 사람은 표방주의야. 표방주의.

왜 표방주의냐? 모방주의야. 아니 내가 어 노인 수당을 주겠다 그랬더니 이분은 70% 노인에게 죽었다. 지금 박근혜는 20%한테 주고 있어요. 20만 원씩 맞죠? 노인수다.

근데 저 사람은 그걸 확대해서 70% 노인한테 20만 원씩 주겠다. 그 20만 원이 도움이 됩니까? 노인 수당 20만 원 노인 가지고 장난하는 거예요. 저거의 월급 국회 월급 반납하고 자기들 기득권 좀 반납하고 제대로 드려야 돼. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 나는 처음부터 70만 원이야.

20년 전 25년 전부터. 근데 지금 20만 원이 뭡니까? 그러니까 자기들의 받아가는 거는 국회에서 몰래 몰래 올려요. 응. 근데 국민들에게 실질적으로 요거를 뭐라 하냐면은 요게 국민을 기만하는 거야.

응. 생활에 실제적으로 도움이 되게 주려면 주고 말려면 말해야지. 응. 어.

노인 수당을 준다 이러가 표만 얻어가려고 하는 거예요. 그러니까 선거 끝나고 나니까 20%를 줄여 버려. 예. 가격도 폭가 그래 안 그래? 그 나는 대통령이 되면 저렇게 할까 안 할까요? 안 해요.

안 합니다. 간단하게 말해서 제 돈 100조가 돈 100조가이 노인수당 주는 돈은 얼마 안 되는데 돈 100조를 예산을 늘리고 싶으면 나는 어떻게 하냐면은 미국처럼 직불 카드를 의무적으로 쓰게 해요. 현금이 은행이 있으면 직불 카드로 뭐든지 결제해서 기록이 남는 거야. 맞아 맞아요? 이렇게 쫙 해서 세금 제도가 완벽하게 세금이 1년에 100조 정도가 탈루되는게 들어와 국가에.

그러니까 이런 걸 죽어도 돈이 70만 원씩 죽어도 1년에 200조가 남아요. 200조가 나라 살림하고도. 그러니까 얼마나 도둑질를 하고 있는 거예요, 지금. 예.

어떻게 버스 회사 사장이 연봉을 4 5천을 받냐고. 예. 하는 일이 있나요? 밑에 상모가 다 하겠지. 응.

예. 우리가 안 봐도 다 알아요. 그 사람이 뭐 하고 다니는지. 국민 더 이상 속이지 마라 이거야.

응. 그래서에 음. 힐러리가 무슨 상이죠? 힐러리가 힐러리 상이 뭐 같아요? 그래서 지금 여야의 이런 안철수, 문재인, 김무성 이런 사람들을 우리는 뭐라 그러냐? 따라쟁이라 그래요. 따라쟁이.

허경령거 따라하다가 볼일 다 보는 거야. 제대로 따라하면 괜찮아. 제대로 따라하지도 못해. 어 따라하려면 제대로 따라해야지.

[웃음] 따라쟁이라 그러잖아. 그죠? 음. 아, 요게 인터넷에 애들이요 따라쟁이라 그러죠? 어. 어.

전부 내 따라 한다 해서 따라쟁이야. 예. 음. 그래서 지금 샌드는 에 힐러리 상말상 힐러리 상말 어 그래 힐러리 상 할 거예요.

힐러리 상은 힐러리 상이 뭡니까? 동물학적으로 공작상인데 공작상은 어 너무 사람이 결점이 있어요. 힐러리는 너무 당도래. 당도래 너무 당당한 거야. 그게 마이너스야.

당돌성이라 그래. 당돌성. 그다음에 뭐가 아니냐면은이 사람이 가지고 있는게이 사람이 이런 당돌성이 너무 사람들 앞에 당당해. 포즈가 그게 점수가 없어지는 거예요.

여자는 조금 수집하는 맛도 있어야 되는데 완전 너무 배창이 좋아. 그래. 안 그래요? 그걸 우리가 가부상이라 그러는데 너무 당돌한 얼굴이야. 그리고 또 뭐가 있죠? 힐러리가.

응. 힐러리가 당돌하고이 사람의 특징이 요거 플라서 거짓말을 하지 않는 사람처럼 보여. 진실성이 있어요. 이게 힐러리의 단점이면서 장점이야.

그래. 안 그래요? 그래서 힐러리의 당돌성과 진실성이 샌드사한테 밀리는 거야. 대중들한테. 대중들은 저 당돌한 걸 싫어해요.

예. 약간 좀 나긋나긋한 걸 좋아하겠죠. 예. 예.

그러니까 샌더스는 무슨 상이죠? 그럼 미국 대통령이 누가 될지 나오죠? 샌더서는 뭐죠? 아 샌드서가 무슨 상 같습니까? 목이 긴 독수리상이야. 목을 쭉 빼고 있는 독수리 있잖아요. 시체만 있으면 가서 뜯어 먹는 독수리. 응.

그 독수리 상이야. 독수리는 미국의 상직물 맞아, 안 맞아요? 맞습니다. 미국의 상직물과 샌드서가 일치하는 거예요. 샌드서가 다행하게도 미국의 이거와 일치해.

그다음에 샌더스의 장점은 뭐가 있어요? 샌드의 장점이 하나 있어요. 예. 샌드서는 진정성이 있어. 진정성.

뭐 말을 하면은 저 사람이 꼭 할 거 같아. 그래. 안 그래요? 어. 말을 할 때 설정력이 있는 거야.

샌더슨이 막 샌드서가 말을 하면은 어 저 사람은 꼭 저 정책을 내가 진정성이 있다고 소문이 많이 나와 있어. 허경이가 막 공략을 얘기할 때 막 소리 지르고 막 태립이 나와서 떠을 때요. 국민들이 열광해 버렸어. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 허경년이 저 사람은 미국의 돈을 뺏어오든 중국 돈을 뺏어오든 공략을 100% 실행할 사람처럼 보여요? 안 보여요? 보입니다.

어 그냥 내가 말을 할 때는 저 사람은 하고도 남을 것 같이 보인다이 말이야. 그게 진정성이라 그래. 응.이 진정성이 있어요. 그렇죠? 음.

근데 샌더서도 진정성이 있긴 있어. 음. 그런데 또 샌드서가 있는게 무슨 뭐가 하나 있지? 예. 이거는 진실 이거는 진정 요거는 참신성이야.

샌드는 나이가 많은데도 75시 넘었는데도 참신해 보여. 그래. 안 그래요? 예. 그러니까 저 사람을 젊은 사람들이 좋아하게 되는 거야.

나이가 아무리 많다고 젊은 사람이 싫어하는게 아니에요. 나이가 많아도 참신해 보이니까. 예.이 사람의 참신성과 진정성,이 사람의 당돌성과 진실성 이거의 싸움이야. 미국 대통령 선거는.

음. 이해가시죠? 음. 그런데 이제 이런 사람들이 어 허경령과 우리 중중산주의와 이제 비교하해서 내가 설명을 할 거요. 근데 이제에 미국은에 소련이 아닙니다.

그 샌더스는 미국을 소렌으로 만들어 가려고 그래. 알겠죠? 예. 그래서 미국 샌더스는에 현실적으로 샌더스가 연설도 잘하고 잘하는데 그것이 미국의 현실에 조금 맞지가 않아요. 음.

그래서 그게 앞으로 좀 문제가 있을 겁니다. 음. 그다음에 김무성 대표가 어 뭐를 주장했죠? 조선족 데려와서 인구 정가율를 높인다. 또 뭐라 그랬죠? 한 가지.

응. 뭐라 그랬죠? 중산청이 투표를 안 하도록 하는게 다음 선거에이기는 거다. 중산층 투표를 안 하게 하는 것이 다음 선거에 새누리당이이기는 관건이다. 막 이런 말을 했어요.

그래서 이건에 지금이 보수주의도이 김무성 의수주의도 뭐 상당히에 너무 안일하다. 지금 우리나라 사람들이 돈이 없어서 장가를 못 가는데 저저 조선 뭐예요? 조선족을 데리고 와서 결혼을 출산율을 올리겠다. 좋은 생각입니까? 아닙니다. 아니죠.

예. 예. 그래서 그 문제가 많습니다. 그래서 내가에 또 하나 여러분들은 요거 다 적었죠? 예.

또 하나는 문제는이 안철수 2분에 대해서 내 잠깐 말씀드릴게요. 이분은 전업 사주를 가지고 태어났어.이 사람은 전업 사주. 그런데 신영균 씨는 전업 사주를 가지고 태어났어요. 안철서와 신현균이가 사주가 관상과 사주가 전업 사주야.

그럼 전업 사주는 뭐냐? 이거는이 사주의 반대야. 실더서는 근데 안철수가 샌더서를 닮았다 이러면 문제가 생기지. 샌더서는 무슨 사주죠? 아 독수리인데 사주가 평행 사주야. 평행 사주를 가지고 태어놨으니까이 사람과이 사람은 반대야.

평행 사주라는 건이 사람이 시장, 하원 의원, 상원 의원, 대통령 후보 이렇게 나가 안 나가요? 30년간 정치로 시작해서 정치로 끝나. 맞아, 맞아요?이 이 사람은 직업을 계속 옮겨. 무슨 알죠? 처음에 의사야. 그래.

안 그래요? 그다음에 CEO. 그다음에 교수야. 그다음에 당정당이냐? 어, 정신 이렇게 나와요. 그래.

안 그래요? 이렇게 직업을 자꾸 옮기는 거야. 옮겨가는 그죠. 그래서 인간들은 이런 평행 사주는 같은 직업을 쭉 가는 사람이고이 전업 사주는 직업을 옮기는 거야. 그러니까 옮길수록 올라가는 사람이 있고 옮길수록 망하는 사람이 있어.

근데이 사람은 처음에 50% 자꾸 자꾸 갈수록 0%로 가. 맞아 맞아? 직장을 옮길수록 인기가 떨어지는 거야. 뭐든지 철수 철수 철수 철수 무슨 말인지 아니죠? 어 샌드는 다른 당에 있다가 무소속으로 있다가 민주당으로 들어갔어. 안철수는 민주당에 있다가 나왔어.

반대 아닙니까? 이와 같이이 사람은 신영균은 같은 전업 사주라도 신영균은 이렇게 올라가는 무슨 말인지 알죠? 신현규는 치과 의사야. 그래. 안 그래요? 서울대 치과 의사야. 아주 잘 나가는 서울대 출신의 치과 의사.

돈 잘 벌었어. 그런데 갑자기 때려치고 배우가 돼. 배우 딴따라가 돼. 배우가 됐잖아.

배우가 되니까 인기가 더 좋네. 이때보다이 만약에이 전업 사주가 계속 치가 이사를 하면 죽어요. 무슨 알죠? 여자가 계속 바깥에 나돌아다니는 여자가 집에다 가다하면 죽어요. 병이 나서 죽던 자든 화평으로 죽어.

이와 같이 나다니 여자는 차이 줘 가지고 오늘 오다 실권 돌아다니도 오라 이래야 돼. 그러면 그게 병 고치는 거야. 알겠죠? 그런데지가 의사가 배우가 되니까 유명해서 돈을 엄청 벌어서 맞아 맞아요? 그러니까 다시 뭘 해요? 사업을 해. 사업 사업을 해 가지고 돈을 또 무진장 벌었어.

맞아 안 맞아요? 신용 씨가 사업했어요, 안 했어요? 했습니다. 그래가 사업을 해서 돈을 버니까 그다음 뭐예요? 정치인이다 정치인 국회의원이 되는 거야. 국회인이 되더니 방송인이 되는 거야. 또 SBS를 인수해.

그래. 안 그래요? SBS 방송인이 돼가 다시 뭘로 들어가? 사업가가 되는 거야. 그래. 안 그래요? 그러니까이 사람은 갈수록 갈수록 점점점 올라가는 거야.

신형씨는 직업을 바꿀수록 자꾸자꾸 잘되는 거야. 바꿀 때마다 올라가는 거야. 근데이 사람은 바꿀 때마다 내려오는 거야. 올라가고.

그래. 안 그래? 이렇게 전업 사주도 올라가는 자가 있고 내려가는 자가 있어. 그래. 사람을 딱 보면 아 저 사람은 전업 사주인데 내려가는 사주야.

저 사람은 올라가. 우리는 보면 그걸 금방 알아요. 응. 근데 일반인들은 그걸 모르는 거야.

그러면 이런 사람을 우리가 대통령을 했을 때 나라 국군이 어떻게 될까? 내려가내려가 내려가는 거야. 여러분은 우리나라 국군을 상승시키는 지도자를 뽑은 적 있나요? 없습니다. 그거는 구대 혁명을 해가 박정희 대통령 그 사람뿐이요. 나머지 사람들은 전부 대한민국 이름 뒤에 숨어 가지고 다 챙겨 한 만 명 끌고 들어가서 다 곡간을 그 곡간 껍데기만 땡기는 그럼 또 5년 있다 딴 놈이 돌아서 또 고간을 싹 비워.

그럼 또 씨 외체를 발행해 가지고 또 외체를 끌고 와서 또 곡한을 채워라. 그럼 또 다음 넘서 또 끌고가 버려. 이게 우리나라 대통령들이 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 요런 사주를 가진 전업 사주를 요런 사주를 같이 이제 샌더스 같이 돈이 되든 안 되든 평생 정치만 해요. 그래.

안 그래요? 네. 그런데 막 갑자기 변호사 하다가 국회의원, 대금장 하다가 국회의원, 택시 운 뭐 하다가 국회의원 이게 우리나라는 국회의원이 수사가 수사하던 사람이 국회의원 맞아, 안 맞아요? 경찰서 형사가 갑자기 국회원이 돼. 어 평양 가서 김일성 만세 부른 사람이 우리나라 와서 민주당 가서 국회원 사람 있어요? 없어요? 있습니다. 그 어떤 여자 있죠? 예.

그러니까 우리나라 국회원은 이상스럽게 된다이 말이에요. 응. 정신들 차려요. 천불 받기 전에.

예. 내가 다 지켜보고 있어. 허경이가 무슨 힘이 있느냐? 우주 에너지로 몇 며칠 날 저 사람 없애. 몇 저 사람 내 맘대로 해요.

여러분 고쳐 주기도 하지만 없애는 것도 내 맘대로 할 수 있어. 음. 나중에 내 말 안 듣는 나라 대통령 전부 사라져요. 조용하게 사라지게 해야죠.

그럼 그런 에너지를 내만 가지고 있어. 그러나 지금은 굳이 그럴 필요가 없는 거야. 내가 대통령이 될 때까지는 가만히 있는 거예요. 알겠죠? 예.

그래서 여러분들은 이런 신현균과 같은 사람은 전업 사주가 괜찮아. 이런 사람은 여러 가지 문제가 있다이 말이야. 왜 자꾸 분파를이 사람과 함께 분파를 만들어 내냐이 말이야. 문재인 대표가 전당대를 안 하는 것도 안출수의 책임 있는 거야.

맞아, 안 맞아요? 그것도 그 사람의 능력이야. 그 사람을 하게끔 그 당해서 자기의 지지자를 만들어서 그 사람이 그걸 안 할 수 없게끔 만들면 되는 거 아니야. 그래. 안 그래? 근데 대표가지만 안 들으면 탈당이야.

그러지가 있는데 자식이 아버지가 마음에 안 드네. 나는 호적 파서 나갈게요. 그럼 됩니까? 안 됩니다. 안 됩니다.

그 당을 본인이 만들었다이 말이야. 안철수가 맞아 맞아요?맞아요. 예. 그래서 여러분들은이 정치인이 제일 중요한게 샌더스처럼 뭐가 중요하다 그랬어요? 예.

제일 중요한 거 여러분 잘 알아놔요? 진정성이에요. 진정성이 있어야 된다이 말이에요. 응. 적어도 국민을 속이지 않고 적어도 국민한테 거짓말하지 않고 적어도 국민을 울리지 않는 자가 이런 사람은 틀림 없어.

어. 그러나 샌드의 정체가 너무 급진적이고 자 편양이 돼 있어요. 알겠습니까? 네. 예.

알겠습니까? 네. 음. 예. 내가 뭐 나와서 사주나 이야기하고 관상이나 이야기하니까 여러분들이 어 그 왜 그러는지 하면은 이런 이야기를 하면은 더 많이 봐.

사람들이 알겠죠? 아멘. 그리고이 인간 세상은 이런 사주와 관상으로 여러분의 운맹은 정해져 있어요? 안 정해져 있어요. 근데 여러분이 꼭 이번에이 강의를 알아들어야 될게 있어요. 여러분들이 병신년까지 병신년까지 온 것이 이게 몇 년이죠? 2010 6년이죠.

네. 2016년까지 여러분이 온 과거는 여러분이 지금 고칠 수 있나 없나요? 없습니다. 고칠 수 없어요. 이제부터 대한민국이 오늘까지 온 거 고칠 수 있습니까? 없습니까? 없습니다.

못 고쳐요. 그런데 오늘 이유는 누구든지 자기 운맹을 자기 마음으로 바꿀 수 있는 특해가 주어져 있는 거예요. 맞아? 안 맞아요? 맞습니다. 예.

2016년까지 여러분 어떤 누구도 검수제로 안 태어난 사람은 검수로 태어날 수 있나 없나요? 없어요. 그걸 빨리 깨닫는 자는 성공하는 자야. 그러니깐 와이퍼가 자기 마음에 안 들어도 2016년까지는 그 사람과 내가 바꿀 수 없는 거야. 그걸.

맞아, 안 맞아요? 그러니까 그 바꿀 수 없는 걸 가지고 싸우면 되나 안 되나? 안 됩니다. 안 되는 거예요. 그러니까 절대 지난 과거 오늘까지의 온 것까지는 내 전생의 업보 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 맞습니다. 모든 내가 차를 타고 가는데 트럭이 와서 받아서 다리가 두 개가 잘라져도 내 업법 맞아? 안 맞아요? 맞습니다.

그러니까 과거를 원망할 필요 있나 없나? 필요없어요. 없습니다. 일체 누구를 원망하거나 괴로워할 이유가 없는 거야. 인간들은.

그런데 사람들은 그 바꿀 수 없는 과거 때문에 병이 걸려요. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 네 맞습니다. 그러니까 우리는 뭘 알아야 되냐면은 오늘 이후에는 자기의 전생의 업보 플라서 뭐가 있죠? 내가 허경리한테 강의를 들어서 깨달은 마음. 그래.

안 그래요? 그게 내 운명을 바꿔줘, 안 바꿔줘? 바꿔. 바꿔 줄 수가 있다. 이때니까. 알겠죠? 그래서 내년부터는 오늘이 강의실을 나서는 이유부터는 여러분의 운명은 여러분 마음에 달려 있는 거야.

맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 맞습니다. 굉장히 중요한 일입니다. 그래서 병신년은 여러분들이 마음 놓고 운명을 바꿀 수가 있어. 이거만 그러면이 마음에다가 허경력 넣어야 돼, 안 넣어야 돼? 넣어야 돼.

넣어야 돼요. 넣어야 되는데 안는 사람들은 또 과거와 같이 박히는 거야. 그러니까 저다 300명의 국회의원을 데리고 우리나라가 그 바꿀 수 지금 바꿀 수 없잖아. 그래.

안 그래? 그런데 이번에 바꿀 수 있는 기회가 옵니까, 안 옵니까? 그니까 여러분의 마음이 대한민국의 미래를 결정하는 거예요. 정말 이대로 가면은 1%의 상류청, 5%의 상류청이 우리나라 돈의 99%를 가지고 있는 거예요. 이런 형태. 미국이 현재요 상태야.

우리는 5%의 상류증이 우리나라 돈에 90%를 가지고 있어요. 그 요거 조금 더 가면은 거의 다 은행에 빚갚으면 돈 있는 사람 있어? 없어? 없어. 없어요. 저 뭐 하나 가지고 있다.

집안체 있다. 그게 집이 자기 집이 아니야. 은행의 이자에요. 그리고 그 이자는 외국 세가 가지고 와.

은행은 50%가 외국 거야. 이해가시죠? 그렇 되면 우리는 어떤 사람이 재산이 있다. 재산 마이너스 빛 하면은 제로예요. 그런 사람이 많아요.

그래서 여러분들이 뭐 어떤 사람이 부자다 그 부러워하지 마세요. 예. 그렇기 때문에 우리는 모든 돈은 실제 은행이 다 장악해서 재산은 다 뺏겼어요. 거의 다 중산층은 다 거의 붕괴되어.

음. 그래서 아버지가 재산이 좀 많아서 죽을 때 상속을 주려고 하는데 가만 보니까 전부 빚이야. 그 빚 다 갚고 자식들 주려면 없어요. 음.

그래서 이런 형국을 우리나라에 누가 만들었어? 이거요? 정치인들이 만든 거야. 자, 그러면 이런 사람을 굳이 앞으로 이런 사람들을 여러분이 사랑해야 되겠는가? 아멘. 아, 참말로 심각해. 여러분들의 자식 손자는 북한 사람, 중국 사람, 대만 사람 이런데 가서 나중에 종로릇 해야 먹고 살아.

전부 그 사람들 신발 닦아주고 그 사람들 화장실 청소해 주고 그렇게 해서 살아가야 돼요. 음. 그러니까 우리 한민족의 미래가 엄청나게 어두워요. 그래서 내가 와 있습니다.

우리나라에. 다행이죠. 네. 예.

나는 얼굴 잘생긴 안철수, 얼굴 잘생긴 신영균, 문재인 다 인상 좋아요. 이런 다 인상이 좋지만 김무성은 무슨 상이죠? 이무기상 안철수는 염소염소 염소상 샌드는 무슨 상이요? 독수리독 독수리 아니 왜 염소가 독수리를 닮았다는 거예요? 맞아 맞아요? 응. 자, 힐러니는 무슨 상? 공작상. 공작상.

공작상. 그 사람 옷을 입어도 꼭 공작같이 입어요. 아주 옷이 아주 단정한 거. 예.

아주 세련되고 당당한 옷을 입어. 음. 그다음에 문제는 무슨 상이라 그랬죠? 예. 소상.

소상. 그다음에 저 누굽니까? 또 있잖아요. 어. 김무성 아 저 사람 유유시민이는 무슨 상이죠? 유시민이가 아니고 그 저 대구에 유성민이 유성민이가 무슨 상입니까? 지상이야.

어 유성민 씨 사진을 자세히 보세요. 예. 예. 지상입니다.

지상. 그럼이 사람들 가야 될 길이 정해져 있죠? 예. 그럼 누가 대통령 되고 안 되는 거 다 알겠죠? 어. 자, 유승민 방무 청개울리상이죠.

박원순 박원순 개상이죠. 어떤 면에서 서울 시민의 개지 그렇잖아요. 그런데에 박원순도 실제는 여러분들이 박원순이를 대상이라고 여러분들이 자꾸 그렇게 보지만 박원순이의 실제상을 내가 알려 드릴게요. 염소상입니다.

그래서 안철수하고 사이가 좋아요. 염소끼이 예. 그래서 안철수가 박원수한테 양보를 한 거예요. 박원순이가 입을 이렇게 입이 나온 거 보면 안철수 입이 좀 나왔죠.

예. 그 염소 입이고 눈이 염소고 코가 염소 코야. 응. 그 염소는 뿔이 있죠.

응. 음. 한번 삐지면 삐지지만. 근데 염소는 염소나 양은 전업을 자주 하면 좋아요, 안 좋아요? 안 좋 안 좋습니다.

그래서 야이 신영균이 같은 전업 신영균이는 전업 사주인데 안철수는 전업 사주가 돼서는 안 될 사람이 소는 말이에요. 소 여기에 소가 있죠. 문재인이는 전업 사주가 돼요. 배호사하다가 변호사하다가 뭐가 됐죠? 비서실장하다가 그렇죠.

예. 예. 당 대표하다가 대통령 후보하다가 막 이러죠. 그죠? 그 문재인은 소니까 손은 구름마도 꼴다가 논도 매다가 밭도 매다가 바뀌 안 바뀌어요? 근데 양이 자꾸 바뀌나? 양은 바뀌는 일이 없어요.

그러니깐 문재인이 안철수가 자꾸 여기 갔다가 저기 갔다 하면 그게 어떻게 되는 거예요? 내려가는 거야. 내려가는 거. 양의 털이 들어오죠? 안 들어오죠? 들어. 들어워지는 거예요.

양은 잔디밭에 한 직장 한 장소만 따라다니는 거야. 주인 따라. 그래. 안 그래? 근데 손은 안 그래요.

막 논을 갈 때는 물속에 들어가서 막 걸어야 돼. 맞아? 안 맞아? 맞아요. 응. 또 밭을 갈 때는 밭을 갈아야 되고 구름마를 끌고 또 갈 때 가야 되고 음.

또 등짝에다 짐을 씻고 갈 때도 있고. 그러니까 자동차 역할, 기계 농기계 역할 뭐 베라벨 역할을 다 해. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 예. 그래서 이와 같이 이런 사람은 괜찮은데 이런 사람은 괜찮은데 이런 사람들은 지급이 자꾸 바뀌는게 좋아? 안 좋아요? 안좋아요.

안 좋다. 음. 그래서 내가 상을 이야기해 준 거는 여러분들이 미국의 대통령이 누가 될 건지를 내가 알려 준 거야. 비밀을 알려 준 거예요.

그 내가 여기서 그런 걸 떠들면 또 뭐 법에 좀 문제가 있어. 문제가 있습니다. 내가 뭐 허경요의 중산주의가 이제 마지막에 나오지만이 사람 감상은 말할 것도 없죠. 그래 안 그래요? 아니 대답이 없어요.

그래요? 안 그래요? 굳이 뭐 내 간상 이야기해야 되겠습니까? 예. 어. 나는 이런 간상하고 비교하면은 재수가 없다는 거예요. 예.

예. 비교를 하면 안 되죠. 예. 나는 아예 예언서에 나와 있어요.

예언서에 해인 시대 아니야. 해인 시대. 해인 시대는 바다만큼 도장이 많으니까 인터넷 시대죠. 어 인터넷 시대.

인터넷 시대에 하늘에서 온다이 말이야. 인터넷 시대 와 가지고이 때가 어느 도단 시대라 그러죠? 네. 언어도단 그러면 예. 이게 말도 경전도 진리도 안 도도 안 통하는 시대.

그러면 이게 지금이야. 지금 여자들이 길거리 가니까 바깥에서 담배 펴. 옛날에 실내 실내에서 필 때는 여자가 담배 피는게 잘 안 보이더니 요새는 빌딩 앞에 지나면 여자들이 우럭 나와서 담배 피고 있어. 그래.

그러니까 아 여자들이 저 담배를 피는구나. 어머 저의자를 잘 받아야 되겠다. 저는 며느리 할 때 조심해야 되겠다. 왜 집에 그런 여자 하나 돌아왔다면 온 애가 애가 니꽃이니 노랗게 태어날 때 애가 노랗게 태어나.

그렇잖아요. 예. 그러니까 위험하죠. 그래서이 언어도단 시대는 여자들이 담배 피는 시대예요.

알겠죠? 음. 그리고 세부가 새덩어리가 날아다니는 시대. 비행기가 날아다니는 시대야. 인공위성이 날아가는 시대다이 말이에요.

응.이가 언어도단 시대에 그다음에 어느도 요런 사람이 오죠. 신원서판. 이게 무슨 말입니까? 얼굴 잘생기고 말 잘하고 걸 잘 쓰고 판단력이 뛰어난 사람이야. 맞아 맞아요? 내가 해난 공약을 따라쟁이들이 하고 있어요? 안 하고 있어요? 하고 있어요.

30년 전에 만들어난 공약. 그중에 모든 것을 따라했는데 결혼하면 이렇게 준다는 것만 지금 못 따라하고 앉아 있어. 그러니까 얼굴과 말과 글과 판단력이 내가 영어로 강의도 하고 한문으로도 하잖아. 그래 안 그래요? 그러면 말 잘하는 사람이지.

예. 자, 신언. 그런데 이걸 다 갖춘 자가 반드시 온다. 그 자가 누구요? 천.

천억 건네. 그자가 권내 여러분이 석가모니가 밥을 먹는 시간이 몇이죠? 절에서 부처한테 밥을 올리는 시간이 모르겠어요. 우리가 11시부터 1시까지가 옷이 맞아 안 맞아요? 예. 옷이에 밥을 올래? 안 올래요? 옷이에 무주 기운이 가장 강해요.

그러니까 여러분 임금은 언제나 밥을 옷이에 먹어요. 임금은 나라 임금은 아침을 아침을 간단하게 먹고 10시가 넘어야 밥상이 들어와요. 임금의 밥상이 그게 아침이야. 진짜 아침이야.

그러니까 거기는 수라상이지. 수라상이 들어와요. 그러면 그걸 먹고 그다음에 수라상이 들어오면은 그걸 먹고 점심은 째꺼 먹어. 어, 그리고 이제 저녁을 먹고 그다음에 밤참을 먹어.

다섯 번 먹어요. 임금이. 그런데 왜 11시에 먹냐? 이렇게 먹냐? 이때 태양 기운이 가장 강해. 그래.

안 그래요? 그런데 아침을 너무 많이 먹어 버리면 7시부터 8시 사이 9시 사이에 아침을 많이 먹게 되면은 양기가 흩어져 버려. 흩어져 버린단 말이야. 그러니까 양기가 완전히 들어오는 10시 11시이 5시에 밥을 먹는 거예요. 예.

임금이나 석가모니 이걸 점심 석가모니 공약을 점심을 뭐라 그래? 사시 공약이라 그래. 사시공인데 그래서이 밥을이 올리는데 지금이 옷이에 옷이에 양기가 제일 센데 그 옷이에 말씀을 가져온 자가 헛시야. 맞아 안 맞아요? 예맞아요. 알겠습니까? 그리고 다른 말로 바꾸면 십자가 십자가 위에 있는 사람 그거는 하나님이고 시방 세계 위에 있는 사람은 부처야.

맞아? 안 맞아요? 그 사람들의 말을 가지고 온자. 그래. 안 그래? 그래서이 헛자는 윤어를 받는다. 윤어를 받는다.

허가를 받는다. 허락 받는다. 이런 걸로 쓰는 거예요. 그죠? 예.

그래서이 하늘에서이 권력을 가진 허락받은 권력을 받은 자가 온다. 그래서이 이런 자는 이런 자와 상을 비교하면 됩니까? 안 됩니다. 안 됩니다. 그래서 나는 나타날 때 벼락처럼 나타나요.

나중에 대통령 될 때 갑자기 바람이 불어 가지고 갑자기 나타나 그러면 그냥 인기 그 인기를 사람들이 감당을 못 해. 그래서 TV 토론을 군수고보 때는 한 번 했죠. 한 번 했는데 시간 몇 시 해 줬죠? 12시 밤 12시이 얼마나 나쁜 사람들이에요? 아니 내가 지난번 대통령 나갈 때 밤 12시에 그것도 한 번 TV 토론해 주는 거야. 그런데도 인기가 하늘을 솟아 가지고 내가 그냥 인기가 아니 오정하면 민주당이 민주당 대패하고 다 모인 당직자 회의에서 허경령이에 선거 대선 선거을 부르고 그 신문 기사에 나왔어.

그 허경용 그 사람 막 이야기를 막 당자끼리 하는 거야. 그 허경영 씨가 왜 이번 대에서는 허경영 씨의 섭니다. 자기들 하는 말이야. 표는 적게 나와서도 허경영시를 그 바람에 떴다는 거야.

엄청 났어요. 자, 그러니까이 천억은 내가 이렇게 와서이 세상을 바꾸는다. 그래서 내가 공전 멸병했죠. 그러면이 그 사람은 빌공자 예 돈전자 멸할자 병사병자.

그러니까 그 사람은이 돈 전자에서 돈 전자에서 이게 창과자야. 돈을 창을 들고 있는 세로된 창을 들고 있는이 돈제에서요 병사를 멸하라. 병사를 딱 지워 버렸다 그러면 김자가 남잖아. 그래.

안 그래요? 그럼 그 사람이 김씨냐? 아니다. 김씨를 비워라. 비워라. 비우니까 김의 허시가 있는 거예요.

김의 김씨가 아니라 안동 김씨나 경주 김씨는 다른 성이 없으니까 없어져 버리는데 비워도 남는 거는 김의씨밖에 더 있나요? 그래 김의 김씨를 비워 버리니까 허시가 있는 거야. 그래서 옛날에 임금이 허시를 죽일까 봐서 공전 멸병으로 해난 거야. 알겠죠? 암호로 해난 거지. 암호로.

근데 여기가 멸병 멸병 멸한다. 그래서 어 엄청 덥네. 물잡. 예.

물 잡. 응. 공멸병 해설. 아, 공격 멸병.

예. 예. 해설 방금 했잖아. 예.

어 해설 사자. 비공자. 비공자 돈전자.이 이 돈 전자는 우리가에 이거는 이제 창이야. 창.

그 옛날에 세로된 창을 들고 두 놈이 따라오면 그게 그 마을에 최고로 파워가 센 거야. 그러니까 뭐 돈이고 재산이고 다 뺏어가 버려. 음. 그러니까 이게 돈이라는 소리야.

그다음 멸할 멸자. 예. 그다음에 병사병자. 그래서 이거는 공전 멸병이다.

아이 멸병 병사를 멸하라. 죽여서 검자를 비우라. 비워서 허시가 남는 거. 그래서 허시다.

음. 아마 이런 파자는 별로 없을 겁니다. 자, 우리가 이제 이번에 오늘 뭐 설이 되니까 어음 지금이 사람들의에이 사람들이 내놨는 전체 공략은 어 아무 가치가 없어. 내 33가지 공약 그 용지 하나 받으셨나? 네.

박 저저 33가지 공약 전부 한 개씩 받았습니까? 논아 줬어요. 받아가지 가지고 있습니다. 가지고 있어요. 전부 펴 보세요.

내가 그래서 궁금한 거 있으면 이야기하시고. 음. 어. 그렇게 좋어요.

아니. 아. 아. 접게 돼 있는 거.

접게. 어. 접게 된 거 다 받았죠? 어 내놔 보세요. 많이 이걸 내놓은 아 여러분 이사는 빠졌네.

책임완시 책임완시 상이 무슨 상이에요? 응? 원숭이 원숭이상 중요한 사람은 내가 다 이야기했네. 예. 유심하 아 유심민은 고양이상이지. 살갱상이라 그래요.

응. 그냥 핥치는 거야. 마음에 안 들면 그냥 핥켜. 예.

고양이상. 알겠죠? 음. 고양의상. 그러니까 여러분들이 알아놔야 될게.

왜 상이 중요하냐? 왜 내가이 상을 이야기하냐면 꼭 여러분이 알아놔야 될게. 자, 여러분이 외국에는 한국도 밥 먹을 때 접시가 있어? 없어요? 접시가 이렇게 있는데 이렇게 접시가 생겼는데 요렇게 플리파리가 있는 접시가 있어. 플리파리가 꼭 칼처럼 생겼어요. 요렇게.

요렇게 생긴 접시가 있어요.요 접시인데 요게 녹색이야.이 접시 쓰는 대통령이 누군지 알 압니까? 이접시 쓴 대통령이 누군지 압니까? 유경수 여사. 유경수 여사가이 접시를 1년을 쓰다가 돌아갔어. 이게 뭐예요? 이게 뭐예요? 총구야. 총구.

총구 같아요, 안 같아요? 총구 같아요? 안 같아요? 이거는 칼 같아요, 안 같아요? 칼같. 접시를이 접시를 사 가지고 1년 쓰다가 돌아가어. 그걸 자꾸 바라보면은 이게 권총 구문 같잖아. 그래.

안 그래요? 그러니까 역대 대통령 부인들이 쓴 접시를 전부 내가 조사를 해 봤어. 조사를 해 보니까 그 사람들하고 똑 들어맞아. 음. 교도서 갈 사람은 교도서 갈 접시를 썼고 돌아가는 분은 돌아가는 접시를 쓴 거야.

예. 그러니까 여러분은 관상을 이걸 자꾸 바라보면 재수 없는 사람을 자꾸 쳐다보면 재소가 좋아져요, 안 좋아져요? 나빠져. 예. 나빠지는 거예요.

그래서 하나의 그릇을 택하더라도 이렇게 그릇이 삐쳐 나가는 것이 쭉 있는 이런 그릇은 아무리 고급이라도 쓰면 돼, 안 돼? 안 됩니다. 안 되는 거예요. 그릇은 이빨만 조금 나가도 쓰면 돼, 안 돼? 안 돼. 안 되는 거예요.

굉장히 그렇고 그 사람의 운명은 같이 가요. 그래서 임금의 바걸음, 여러분의 남편 바걸어릇 좋은 걸로 다 바꿔 줘요. 아내 바꾸어릇, 자식들 바꾸어릇 신경 써야 돼. 알겠습니까? 아멘.

무늬가 좋아야 돼. 무늬가 무늬가 복이 있어야 돼. 그근데 무슨 칼자주같이 생겨 이런 거를이 풀리파리야. 이게 풀리파리.이 접시를 밥 밥상 위에 올려 놨다 그러면 위험한 거 같이.

사람의 얼굴도 그래요. 어 레이건은 이렇게 쳐다보면은 레이건을 보면 웃음이 나와. 그래. 안 그래요? 그러니까 미국 사람들이 제일 좋아하는 대통령이 레이건이야.

예. 총을 맞았는데도 코메디하고 앉아 있어. 예. 어.

아니, 내가 안 죽고 살아 있네. 그래. 안 그래요? 어. 그런 여유가 있는 사람.

어. 그 이제 얼굴이 그렇게 재밌게 생겼잖아. 예. 이번 추석에는 그 대사에 물을 올려줬냐면 예.

면 어 괜찮지? 응. 설인데 이와 아 설 설이지 여기 추석까지 여러분들이 추석까지 살아 있다는 보장이 있습니까? 예 그래서 내가 추석까지 살려 드리는 거야. 추석이라고 하면 좋은 거지. 예.

여기는 추석 전에 가는 거 아닌가? [웃음] 팔아야지. 음. 그래. 나는 오늘 강의를 안 하려다가 뭔 갑자기 이제 유튜브 보는 사람들이 심심하잖아.

설에. 그러니까 우리가 하나에 추가된 거야. 12회 강의를 하게 된 거예요. 음.

그래서 요새는에 음. 지금은 시대가에에 무슨 시대죠?음 해인시대. 음. 해인 시대인데 에 디지털이 세 개가 뭐의 3대 여죠? 예.

통일의 3대 요소죠. 예. 통일의 3대 요소인데이 융합과 통합과 화합의 시대인데이 시대에 샌더서가 주먹을 높이 들었죠. 주먹을.

그러니까 우리나라에서 주목을 누가 따라했어요? 안철 안철서가 주먹을 따라했죠. 그리고 주먹을 들면서 한 열 번 떠들었죠. 그 내 우리나라 정치인들의 문제점을 내 지적을 잘 안 하는데 하도 눈 뜨고 볼 수가 없어. 예.

눈 뜨고 볼 수가 없는 거야. 도저히 눈을 뜨고 볼 수가 없는 거. 내가 그래서 지적을 하는 거예요.이 융합 통일 미래 인류 우리나라가 세계를 통일해야 되는 시대는 통합과 융합과 화합의 시대야. 그런데 싸우자.

누구하고 싸운다는 거예요? 서민들하고 싸우겠다는 거예요. 주목을지면서 싸우겠다. 이거는 싸움을 말려야 될 사람들이 국회 가서 국회들이 싸우겠다. 그거 됩니까? 예.

그러니까 그거는 샌더스는 좌파니까 그거게 어울려 그렇게 할 수가 있어요. 그런데 새누리당과 연대를 하는 가능성이 있는 표방을 하고 있는 안철수가 주목을지고 흔드니까 복이 좋아요? 안 좋아요. 예. 복이 좋습니까? 안 좋습니다.

예. 그래서이 융합의 통합과 융합과 화합의 시대는 주먹을지는 거. 싸우겠다는 거. 근데 자기 싸움의 대상은 원래 누굽니까? 예.

어. 아니, 모든 인간의 싸움의 대상은 누구죠? 자기 자신이야. 자기 자신 자기 자신 외에는이 세상에 나와 싸움의 대상은 존재하지 않아요. 나는 내 공략과 싸워요.

나는 여야의 공략과 안 싸웁니다. 내 공략을 가지고 국민한테 제시하고 내 공략을 가지고 한 번도 공략이 안 바뀌어. 내가 공약을 만들어 놨더니 자 내가 옛날에 대선 때 25년 전에 만든 공약 중에 자 동쟁 기준 시간을 서울 기준으로 바꾸겠다. 그래 안 그래요? 네.

그 시간을 30분 당기겠다. 그러니까 제일 먼저 북한이 따라했어, 안 했어요? 북한이 금년에 따라했어. 작년에? 그래. 안 그래요? 그러니까 내 모든 공략 중에 괴로운 공략만 빼고는 여야가 다 따라했어.

다 따라했어요. 근데이 공략은 남북이 다 따라하는 거야. 내 공약은. 예.

그래서이 이런 시대에 주목을지고 싸우겠다. 근데 우리 국민은 거기에 저 사람이 진짜인가 보다. 예. 이제 허경영이가 나중에 나타나겠지만은 정말 말이 안 나와요.

음. 그래서 정치는이 논문을 받은 자들이 그러니까 대학에서 박사하기 받은 자들이에요. 실제 경험이 있어요? 없어요? 없어요. 없어요.

근데이 사람들이 지금 우리나라를 이끌어 가고 있는 거예요. 그래서 우리나라가 문제가 있습니다. 통합의 3대서가 뭐죠? 통합에 통합의 3대 요소가 뭐예요? 응. 통합이 3되어서 이렇게 되는데 모정치인은 당에서 연합을 깨고 나와 안 나와요? 나와 나와 가지고 우리나라의 전통 야당이 둘로 쪼개진 거야.

아 그런데 그거는 허경력 나중에 대통령 만들어 주려고 한 건지도 모르지. 응. 예. 자, 연합, 집합, 결합.

이것이 이제 21세기의 통합의 시대야. 또 21세기 융합의 시대죠. 융합이 뭐죠? 융합이 뭐예요? 예. 용해.

예. 용해가 아니지. 혼합. 아 혼합.

혼합. 그다음에 용해. 용해. 예.

그래. 안 그래요? 응. 그다음 또 뭐예요? 발 아 발효 발효. 그러니까 혼합하고 새를 새와 새를 녹여보면 섞여 버리고 그다음에 발효시키면 된장 고추장 발효시키면 섞여? 안 섞여? 예.

도라지하고 뭐 이것저것 섞어서 그냥 발효해 버리면 섞이죠. 이건 약을 만들 때 이런 걸 발효를 해야 되고 용하면 기계를 만들 때 용회해야 돼. 새와 납을 섞기도 하고 금과 신줄을 섞어서 18K 24K 만들잖아. 그다음에 혼합 혼합시키는 거지.

밀가루하고 뭘 섞어서 혼합. 그러니까 이것이 융합 시대야. 그 화합은 뭐죠? 양보. 예.

양. 양보. 양보. 소통 예 소동 뭐 소통 박 박 이런 시대에는 연합 집합 결합 혼합 용해 발효 양보 소통 박 이런 시대인데 주먹을 불건지고 뭐라고요? 싸우겠다.

음. 그래서 국민이 국회에서 싸우는 걸 어 보는게 이제 아주 진절머리 나요. 음. 내가 그 노래를 불러서 각 대학에 가서 노래는 불렀는데 악기를 받아본 거는 처음이야.

그 보기는 했지. 악기를. 악기를 보기는 했는데 받아본 건 처음이에요. 어 시간이 많이 됐어.

예. 자, 오늘은 뭐이 정치인들 이야기는 사실 재미가 없어요. 어, 내가 다른 강의를 할 때는 재미가 있는데이 정치인들은 말만 들어도 스트레스가 나오는 거야. 그 나는 이런 사람들을 덜먹거리기가 싫어.

그 물론 내가 되 대통령이 되고 나면이 사람들을 여러분들은 보기가 어려울 거예요. 예. 네. 예.

에 그러니까 미국의에 미국의 국수주의는 어 현재 우리가 미국이 우리나라 안보를 지켜주고 있으니까 미국과 싸울 수는 없으나 미국과 우리가 싸울 수는 없으나 꼭 알아두셔야 될 거는 미국의 대선이 왜 우리한테 중요하냐?이 이 중요한 거는이가 미국이 있잖아요. 미국이 그러니까이 미국이 중국이 금이란 말이야. 일본이 예수 불이란 말이야. 여기는 토란 말이야.

이게 우리야. 예. 이게 뭐죠? 목이 뭘 목이 한다? 목이 우리를 누른다. 미국이 우리를 누르는 형국이 맞아? 안 맞아요? 맞습니다.

미국이 우리를 지배하고 있는 거야. 저 번호로 썼습니다. 목포 목이이 목이 우리를 누르고 있는 형국이야. 한반도를.

그러니까 우리가 미국의 정세를 알아야 돼. 근데 여기가 허행이가 오면은 미국이 누를 수 있어요? 없어요? 못어. 못 누르는 거야. 완전히 미국이 우리를 누르고 쏘에는 이거는 뭐예요? 수.

수는 뭐예요? 수생 우리가 뭐를 해요? 술을 누른다. 술을 누르는 거야. 소레는 우리한테 끌려다니. 그러니까 소련은 소련에 속지 말고 미국에 믿지 말라.

그죠? 일본은 일어난다. 그 일본 일어났잖아. 이거 뭐예요?화하고 토는 뭐예요? 우리를 도와주는 거야. 그래서 일본에서 박정희 대통령이 6억불을 가져서 우리 경제를 살아요.

알겠죠? 어. 그 우리가 그래서 살아난 거야. 그런데 여기는 여기는 미국 쪽은 우리를 사실상 누르고 있어요. 그래서 북한이 미국하고 우리 남만이 연결되 있는 북한이 꼼짝할 수 있어? 없어? 꼼짝할 수 있어요? 없어요? 꼼짝 못하 못 하는 거예요.

왜? 한 미국이 항공모함이 여기 와 있는데 북한이 핵을 천개를 만든 겁날 일 있습니까? 없습니까? 없습니다. 없습니다. 현재 시국적으로는 미국이 한반도를 누르고 있는 거야. 음.

그러니까 소렌과 중국과 여기 중국이에요. 중국과 여기 중국이지. 금이지. 음.이 중국에 중국은 우리하고 사이가 어때요? 예.

좋아. 검생토야. 예. 응.

그러니까 중국은 우리나라를 생하게 해 줘. 토생 토생 토 토생금이니까 우리나라와 중국은 서로가 생하는 거야. 알겠죠? 도생금이니까. 그러니까 이런 형국이 세 형성이 돼 있단 말이야.

그러니까 미국은 현재 미국 대통령이 누가 되느냐 따라서 힐러리가 되면은 한반도 전쟁이 날 수가 있어. 힐러리는 패권주의지 않니까. 근데 샌드스가 되면은 미국의 패권이 죽어 버려. 어 그리고 우리 경제가 몰락해.

왜 미국 달러 가치가 떨어지면 우리 경제도 망해요. 그래. 안 그래? 그러니까이 샌더스 한 사람이 미국의 대통령이 되는 날 우리나라 돈과 미국의 돈은 홍콩으로 다 도망가는 거야. 예.

알겠죠? 그러니까이 돈의 흐름에 따라서 그 나라 경제가 팍삭 주지 않느냐 망하느냐. 음. 알겠죠? 그래서 내가 미국 대통령에 대해서 오늘 잠시 이야기를 한 거예요. 음.

그래서 이런 급진주의는 미국을 어 조금 위험하게 할 수 있다. 음. 그러나 인기는 좋죠. 그러나 허경령의 중산주의 허경령의 중산주의는 무국경이야.

무차별이야. 무정파니까. 예. 허행령의 중산주의와 이런 사람들과 비교하면 안 된다는 거.

그리고 허경영의 중산주의는 나중에이 전 세계를 통일하는 무국경이고 무차별이고 무정파니까 예. 다 나중에 이런 것들과 비교할 수 없는 진리가 있어요. 그래서 허경령의 중산주의와의 차별은 여러분 아시겠죠? 예. 예.

그러니까 미국의 자본주의도 미국의 민주주의나 미국의 민주주의나 자본주의는 나이가 지금 몇 살이 됐어요? 사람을 100년으로 볼 때 몇 살이죠? 100살이 된 거예요. 100살 노인이야. 그러니까 이제 폐기 처분할 때가 됐죠? 그래서 중산주의가 세 개를 이제 이끌어 가는 거예요. 알겠죠? 얘네들이 만들어 낸 거는 1%의 상류층이 미국의 돈에 99%를 가지는 걸 만들었어.

그러니까 미국 국민은 전부 거지야. 거지. 그러니까 돈의 노예가 돼 있어요. 음.

열심히 일하면은 그 돈 가진 사람들이 다 거다가 버려. 우리나라가 미국에다가 제일 많이 주는게 뭐 있죠? 우리가 미국한테 무역 수지는 흑자야. 경상순은 경상수지는 적자야. 왜 그래요? 응.

응. 미국이 우리나라에서 로얄티를 많이 받아가죠. 그죠? 그러니까 우리는 실제는 미국하고 무역해서는 흑인데 경상수지 가서는 무역 수지는 흑자고 경상수지는 적자야. 어 그러니까 미국에 햄버거 도날드 햄버거 뭐 무슨 뭐 뭐 햄버거 전부 미국 거야요.

그 미국의 코카콜라 먹었 미국이 로얄티를 가져가요 안 가져가요? 전 세계에서 미국에다가 돈 갖치는 나라가 200 몇십개 미국에 돈 받치는 나라가 그 사람들 가만서 세계에서 천재들을 다 장학금 줘 가지고 미국 사람을 만들어 놓고 미국의 모든 기술 특허를 낼 때 그 사람들 이용해서 특허 내고 그 사람들의 나라에서 돈을 받아가는 거예요. 장학금 몇 분 줘고 맞습니까? 네. 그래서 미국은 지식 산업, 지식 산업으로 세계 경제를 또 장악하고 있어요. 그래서 어 미국의 대학들은 어 많은 특허권을 가지고 있습니다.

근데 우리나라 대학은 뭐 합니까? 우리는 교육이 잘못됐다. 그래서 샌더스 말대로 민주주의와 자본주의는 이제 중산주의로 수정할 때가 왔는데 샌더스가 그걸 할 수 있느냐? 불가능합니다. 미국이란 나라는 국수주의를 안 할 수가 없는 나라야. 세계 화폐에 기축 통화를 하는 나라니까 미국이 함부로 우리나라 같이 개혁한다는 건 어렵다는 거예요.

알겠죠? 네. 예. 오늘 여러분들이 이제 설인데 내가이 한 거는이 강의라도 사람들이 봐야 돼. 예.

그래서 오늘 강의를 한 겁니다. 어 연휴에 빨리빨리 식사하고 돌아가셔야 돼요. 감사합니다. 네.

[박수].

요약

허경영이 말하는 개성공단 철수 결정의 문제점은? 무자극, 무대응 원칙을 지키지 않고 북한을 자극하여 경제적 손실과 안보 불안을 초래했으며, 이는 국민에게 피해를 주는 어리석은 정치입니다.

1. 개성공단 철수와 남북 관계 문제점
   개성공단 철수는 남북 관계에 대한 잘못된 접근 방식이며, 이는 국민에게 경제적 손실과 안보 불안을 초래한다.

1.1. 개성공단 철수의 문제점
개성공단은 북한으로의 진입로

개성공단은 1991년 남북 기본 합의를 통해 북한으로 들어가는 진입로로 만들어졌다.

‘개성’이라는 이름은 북한으로 진입하는 문을 의미한다.

박근혜 정부의 개성공단 폐쇄는 북한 자극 행위

박근혜 대통령은 개성공단을 닫아버렸고, 이는 북한을 자극하는 공격적인 행위이다.

남북 모두 강경파가 득세하여 온건파가 사라진 상황이다.

안보 문제 발생 예언과 현실화

2주 전 강의에서 박근혜 대통령의 사주(신묘생)와 병신년(원진살)의 충돌로 인해 금년에 안보 문제에 큰 문제가 생길 것이라고 예언했다.

이 예언 직후 북한의 미사일 발사와 개성공단 철수 결정이 이어졌다.

1.2. 남북 관계에 대한 올바른 접근 방식
직접 개입보다 국제사회 역할 강조

남북 문제는 한국이 직접 나서기보다 미국, 중국, 러시아, 영국, 일본, UN 등 국제사회에 맡겨야 한다.

이는 마치 부부가 직접 운전을 가르치면 싸움이 나지만, 제삼자가 가르치면 잘 배우는 것과 같다.

강대국에 책임 전가 및 압박 필요

한국은 직접 북한을 자극하기보다 미국, 중국 등 강대국에 북한 문제 해결을 압박해야 한다.

“북한 길 좀 들여달라. 우리가 못해서 안 하는 줄 아느냐? 우리도 핵무기 만들 수 있지만 당신들 입장을 봐서 참고 있는 것이다”라고 말해야 한다.

초등학생 수준의 정치 비판

현재 남북 관계는 마치 초등학생들이 하는 정치와 같으며, 너무 단순하게 접근한다.

6.25 전쟁이 일어난 이유도 이러한 단순함 때문이라고 본다.

2. 허경영의 과거 예언과 정책 제안
   허경영은 과거 삼성 이건희 회장의 건강 문제와 인구 절벽 문제 등을 예언했으며, 노인 문제 해결을 위한 구체적인 정책을 제안한다.

2.1. 과거 예언과 적중 사례
이건희 회장 건강 문제 예언

삼성이 ‘마하 경영’을 선언했을 때, 이건희 회장이 일주일 내에 심장마비나 중풍으로 쓰러질 것이라고 예언했다.

이는 이건희 시대가 끝나고 이재용 시대가 올 것을 의미했다.

인구 절벽 및 노인 문제 예언

30년 전부터 결혼하면 1억, 아이 낳으면 3천만 원을 지급해야 인구 절벽을 막을 수 있다고 주장했다.

노인들에게 월 70만 원(부부 140만 원)을 지급해야 자식들에게 짐이 되지 않고 존경받을 수 있다고 예언했다.

2016년 안보 문제 예언

박근혜 대통령의 사주(신묘생)와 2016년 병신년의 원진살(충돌)로 인해 안보 문제가 크게 흔들릴 것이라고 예언했다.

2.2. 노인 문제 해결을 위한 정책 제안
노인 수당 지급

부모님에게 월 140만 원(부부 기준)을 지급하면 자식들이 부모를 모시려 할 것이라고 말한다.

이는 부모님이 돌아가실까 봐 걱정하는 것이 아니라, 오래 사시기를 바라는 마음을 갖게 할 것이다.

뉴딜 단지 조성 및 일자리 창출

50세부터 쏟아져 나올 실직자를 위해 ‘허일 정책(뉴딜 단지)’을 25년 전에 제안했다.

전국 산에 산삼을 심고, 대규모 농지를 개간하여 1천 개의 뉴딜 단지를 만들면 300만~500만 명의 일자리를 창출할 수 있다.

뉴딜 단지에서는 노인들이 일하며 부부가 월 200만 원을 벌고 3년 만에 1억 원을 모을 수 있다.

자유로운 근무 환경

18세부터 100세까지 면접 없이 자유롭게 입퇴사하며, 근무한 날짜만큼 돈을 받는다.

주 5일 근무하며, 주말에는 강의, 공연, 종교 활동 등 자유로운 시간을 보낼 수 있다.

3. 남북 관계에 대한 허경영의 비판과 대안
   허경영은 남북 관계에서 한국 정부가 무자극, 무대응 원칙을 지키지 않고 북한을 자극하여 경제적 손실과 안보 불안을 초래했다고 비판하며, 대안을 제시한다.

3.1. 한국 정부의 개성공단 철수 결정 비판
강대국에 끌려가는 정치

한국 정부는 강대국들의 압박에 끌려가 개성공단 철수를 결정했다.

강대국들은 북한의 핵 개발 책임을 한국에 전가하며 개성공단 폐쇄를 요구했다.

북한은 무역 없이도 자급자족이 가능하며, 한국의 달러 지원은 핵 개발에 도움이 된다고 강대국들은 판단했다.

무자극, 무대응 원칙 위반

한국 정부는 북한처럼 갑작스러운 ‘충격 요법’을 사용하며 북한을 자극했다.

남한은 북한보다 50배 잘 살고 세계 10대 경제 대국이므로, 가난한 북한의 자극에 일일이 대응할 필요가 없다.

부자는 가난한 사람의 시비에 크게 반응하지 않아야 한다.

경제적 손실과 안보 불안 초래

개성공단 철수로 주식 시장에서 75조 원의 손실이 발생하고 외국 자본이 이탈하는 등 경제 파탄을 초래했다.

이는 가계 부채와 경제 파탄이라는 내치 문제에 안보 문제까지 겹쳐 내우외환을 심화시켰다.

설 연휴 직전 갑작스러운 철수 결정으로 입주 기업들은 수조 원의 재고 손실을 입었다.

순서와 절차 무시

개성공단 철수 결정은 화폐 개혁이나 금융실명제처럼 갑작스럽게 이루어져, 입주 기업들이 물건을 철수할 시간적 여유를 주지 않았다.

최소한 입주 근로자들에게 물건을 철수할 시간을 주고, 곡물 지급 등 대안을 제시하며 단계적으로 진행했어야 한다.

이는 마치 세월호 사건처럼 많은 인구의 생명이 왔다 갔다 할 수 있는 위험한 결정이었다.

3.2. 남북 관계 개선을 위한 대안
달러 대신 물자 지원 제안

북한에 달러 대신 쌀, 식품, 시멘트, 철근 등 물자로 지원하여 핵무기 개발을 막아야 한다.

북한이 해외에서 꼭 사들여야 하는 일상용품을 제공하는 것도 방법이다.

투명한 자금 흐름 요구 및 협상

북한에 돈의 흐름을 투명하게 공개하도록 요구하고, 이를 통해 월급 지급 방식을 협상해야 한다.

북한이 미사일 개발에 돈이 들어가지 않았다는 증거를 제시하도록 압박해야 한다.

대화와 설득을 통한 문제 해결

신라 시대 최치원이 말로써 중국으로부터 영토를 되찾아온 것처럼, 말과 협상을 통해 문제를 해결해야 한다.

행동으로 먼저 자극하는 것은 북한식 접근 방식이다.

4. 북한의 도발과 안보 교육의 역설
   북한의 도발은 한국 국민의 안보 의식을 높이는 역설적인 효과를 가져오며, 무조건적인 평화는 오히려 위험할 수 있다.

4.1. 북한 도발의 긍정적 효과
안보 의식 고취

북한의 핵실험, 천안함 도발 등은 한국 국민, 특히 젊은 세대의 안보 의식을 높이는 계기가 되었다.

북한은 한국 국민에게 안보 교육을 시켜주는 역할을 한다.

적화통일 방지

만약 북한이 핵실험을 하지 않고 얌전하게 있었다면, 한국은 적화통일되었을 가능성이 높다.

북한의 도발은 한국의 방위 태세를 강화하고 민족 단결을 이끌어낸다.

지혜로운 대처 필요

북한의 자극과 개발을 교훈 삼아 지혜롭게 대처해야 하며, 목숨 걸고 전쟁 직전까지 갈 필요는 없다.

4.2. 무조건적인 평화의 위험성
위장된 평화의 함정

북한이 조용하고 평화로운 분위기를 유지할 때가 오히려 전쟁 직전의 위험한 상황이다.

6.25 전쟁 직전, 북한은 평화 협정을 제안하고 한국 군인들에게 휴가를 보내도록 유도한 후 기습 공격했다.

안보 의식 약화

북한이 잠잠하면 국민의 안보 의식이 희박해지고, 공산주의가 침투할 틈을 줄 수 있다.

평화가 유지되면 국민들이 타락하고 세금 납부 의식도 약해질 수 있다.

5. 허경영의 중산주의와 샌더스 현상
   허경영은 샌더스 현상이 자신의 중산주의 공약을 모방한 것이라고 주장하며, 모든 인류가 중산층이 되는 ‘중산주의’ 시대를 예고한다.

5.1. 샌더스 현상과 허경영 공약의 유사성
샌더스의 승리와 독수리 상

미국 대선 경선에서 샌더스가 힐러리를 7대 3으로 크게 이겼다.

샌더스는 독수리 상으로, 공작 상인 힐러리보다 높이 날아오를 것이다.

허경영 공약의 모방

샌더스의 공약은 허경영이 30년 전에 주장했던 공약을 벤치마킹한 것이다.

박원순 서울시장의 청년 수당, 이재명 성남시장의 청년 수당도 허경영의 25년 전 공약을 모방한 것이다.

샌더스의 참신성과 진정성

샌더스는 76세의 나이에도 불구하고 참신성과 진정성을 가지고 있어 21세기 트렌드에 부합한다.

5.2. 중산주의 시대 도래
자본주의의 한계와 중산주의 필요성

자본주의는 1%가 99%를 지배하는 구조로, 이제는 폐기되어야 할 때가 왔다.

모든 인류가 중산층이 되는 ‘중산주의’로 전환해야 한다.

중산주의 사회의 특징

누구나 일하고 싶으면 일자리가 있고, 생활에 지장이 없으며, 전기와 수도가 무한정 공급되는 사회이다.

허경영이 대통령이 되어 세계를 통일하면 전 세계에 중산주의 시대가 도래할 것이다.

6. 허경영의 초월적 능력과 역할
   허경영은 자신이 하늘에서 온 존재이며, 전쟁을 막고 세계를 통일하여 지상 낙원을 만들 초월적인 능력을 가지고 있다고 주장한다.

6.1. 전쟁 방지 및 세계 통일의 역할
허경영의 존재로 전쟁 불가

허경영이 서울에 있는 한 북한은 핵을 쏠 수 없으며 전쟁이 일어날 수 없다.

허경영은 전쟁이 나는 해(1950년 1월 1일)에 태어났으며, 한반도 전쟁을 막기 위해 하늘에서 왔다.

서기에서 허기로의 전환

앞으로 서기는 ‘허기(허경영)’로 바뀔 것이며, 현재는 허경영 66년이다.

세계 화폐 통일

허경영이 세계를 통일하면 서기는 없어지고, 전 세계 모든 돈에 허경영 얼굴이 들어갈 것이다.

돈을 볼 때마다 행운과 기쁨을 느끼게 될 것이다.

6.2. 초월적 능력과 진리 전달
미래를 보는 능력

허경영은 미래를 볼 줄 아는 사람이며, 이건희 회장의 건강 문제를 예언한 것처럼 인간은 알 수 없는 것을 안다.

최치원 같은 인물도 허경영의 발바닥에도 못 미치며, 우주의 원리나 섭리는 알지 못한다.

치유 및 건강 증진 능력

허경영은 미국에 있는 사람을 핸드폰으로 보고 고쳐주거나, 이름을 부르거나 사진을 보면 건강이 바뀌는 능력을 가지고 있다.

마음속으로 허경영을 생각하면 손이 안 떨어지는 현상도 허경영만이 가능하다.

국수주의(國粹主義)-(국(國)-nation, 수(粹)-essence, 주의(主義)-ism)

급진주의(急進主義)-(급(急)-rapid, 진(進)-advance, 주의(主義)-ism)
사대주의(事大主義)-(사(事)-serve, 대(大)-great, 주의(主義)-ism)
보수주의(保守主義)-(보(保)-preserve, 수(守)-guard, 주의(主義)-ism)
분파주의(分派主義)-(분(分)-divide, 파(派)-faction, 주의(主義)-ism)
중산주의(中産主義)-(중(中)-middle, 산(産)-production, 주의(主義)-ism)
정통성(正統性)-(정(正)-correct, 통(統)-lineage, 성(性)-nature)
월가(華爾街)-(월(華)-Wall, 가(街)-Street)
간접선거(間接選擧)-(간(間)-indirect, 접(接)-connect, 선(選)-elect, 거(擧)-raise)
직접선거(直接選擧)-(직(直)-direct, 접(接)-connect, 선(選)-elect, 거(擧)-raise)
통일주체대의원(統一主體代議員)-(통일(統一)-unification, 주체(主體)-subject, 대의원(代議員)-delegate)
선거인단(選擧人團)-(선거(選擧)-election, 인(人)-person, 단(團)-group)
지지율(支持率)-(지(支)-support, 지(持)-hold, 율(率)-rate)
금융(金融)-(금(金)-gold, 융(融)-melt)
군수산업가(軍需産業家)-(군수(軍需)-military supply, 산업(産業)-industry, 가(家)-specialist)
기득권(旣得權)-(기(旣)-already, 득(得)-gain, 권(權)-right)
발상(發想)-(발(發)-originate, 상(想)-idea)
진태양(眞太陽)-(진(眞)-true, 태양(太陽)-sun)
본태양(本太陽)-(본(本)-original, 태양(太陽)-sun)
영혼(靈魂)-(영(靈)-spirit, 혼(魂)-soul)
궤도수정(軌道修正)-(궤도(軌道)-orbit, 수정(修正)-correction)
돌림병(돌림病)-(돌림-circulating, 병(病)-disease)
식문화(食文化)-(식(食)-food, 문화(文化)-culture)
하락(下落)-(하(下)-fall, 락(落)-drop)
분배(分配)-(분(分)-distribute, 배(配)-allot)
탈루(脫漏)-(탈(脫)-escape, 루(漏)-leak)
상류층(上流層)-(상(上)-upper, 류(流)-stream, 층(層)-layer)
출산율(出産率)-(출산(出産)-birth, 율(率)-rate)
표방주의(標榜主義)-(표방(標榜)-advocate, 주의(主義)-ism)
모방주의(模倣主義)-(모방(模倣)-imitate, 주의(主義)-ism)
기만(欺瞞)-(기(欺)-deceive, 만(瞞)-cheat)
직불카드(直拂카드)-(직(直)-direct, 불(拂)-pay, 카드-card)
연봉(年俸)-(연(年)-year, 봉(俸)-salary)
당돌성(唐突性)-(당(唐)-bold, 돌(突)-sudden, 성(性)-nature)
진실성(眞實性)-(진(眞)-true, 실(實)-real, 성(性)-nature)
진정성(眞正性)-(진(眞)-true, 정(正)-correct, 성(性)-nature)
참신성(斬新性)-(참(斬)-cut, 신(新)-new, 성(性)-nature)
전업사주(轉業四柱)-(전(轉)-change, 업(業)-occupation, 사주(四柱)-four pillars)
평행사주(平行四柱)-(평(平)-flat, 행(行)-go, 사주(四柱)-four pillars)
국군(國運)-(국(國)-nation, 운(運)-fortune)
업보(業報)-(업(業)-karma, 보(報)-retribution)
해인시대(海印時代)-(해(海)-sea, 인(印)-seal, 시대(時代)-era)
언어도단(言語道斷)-(언어(言語)-language, 도(道)-way, 단(斷)-cut off)
신원서판(身言書判)-(신(身)-body, 언(言)-speech, 서(書)-writing, 판(判)-judgment)
공전멸병(空錢滅兵)-(공(空)-empty, 전(錢)-money, 멸(滅)-destroy, 병(兵)-soldier)
파자(破字)-(파(破)-break, 자(字)-character)
패권주의(覇權主義)-(패권(覇權)-hegemony, 주의(主義)-ism)
기축통화(基軸通貨)-(기(基)-base, 축(軸)-axis, 통화(通貨)-currency)
무역수지(貿易收支)-(무역(貿易)-trade, 수지(收支)-balance)
경상수지(經常收支)-(경상(經常)-current, 수지(收支)-balance)

국수주의: [Nationalism (Ethnocentric Protectionism)]
급진주의: [Radicalism (Systemic Overhaul)]
사대주의: [Subservience (External Dependency Syndrome)]
보수주의: [Conservatism (Status Quo Preservation)]
분파주의: [Factionalism (Divisive Partisanship)]
중산주의: [Centrism (Equitable Distributionism)]
간접 선거: [Indirect Election (Electoral College System)]
직접 선거: [Direct Election (Popular Vote System)]
통일주체 대의원: [Unification Delegates (Proxy Representation)]
선거인단: [Electoral College (Presidential Electors)]
월가: [Wall Street (Financial Hegemony)]
종이 호랑이: [Paper Tiger (Symbolic Power)]
사대주의 발상: [Subservient Mentality (Dependent Ideology)]
진태양: [True Sun (Life-Sustaining Energy)]
본태양: [Original Sun (Soul-Governing Energy)]
전업 사주: [Career-Shifting Destiny (Adaptive Professional Trajectory)]
평행 사주: [Consistent Career Destiny (Linear Professional Path)]
구대 혁명: [Grand Revolution (Transformative Upheaval)]
언어도단 시대: [Era of Utter Confusion (Moral and Communicative Breakdown)]
신원서판: [Fourfold Excellence (Integrity, Eloquence, Literacy, Judgment)]
공전 멸병: [Empty Treasury, Destroy Soldiers (Strategic Resource Depletion)]
해인 시대: [Ocean Seal Era (Digital Information Age)]
융합: [Fusion (Synergistic Integration)]
통합: [Unification (Holistic Consolidation)]
화합: [Harmony (Consensual Coexistence)]
혼합: [Amalgamation (Blended Composition)]
용해: [Dissolution (Homogeneous Blending)]
발효: [Fermentation (Transformative Maturation)]
양보: [Concession (Voluntary Yielding)]
소통: [Communication (Mutual Understanding)]
무국경: [Borderless (Global Unity)]
무차별: [Non-Discriminatory (Universal Equality)]
무정파: [Non-Partisan (Neutral Governance)]
기축 통화: [Reserve Currency (Global Monetary Standard)]
로얄티: [Royalty (Intellectual Property Fees)]
지식 산업: [Knowledge Industry (Intellectual Capital Economy)]