2016.12.03 1055 his name has unique spiritual power, surpassing that of Jesus and Buddha.

2016.12.03 1055 Huh Kyung-young.From Prophecy to World Unification.(박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불 시위를 4년전에 예언하고 트럼프 당선을 예언한 허경영이 90%선거로 대통령이되고 세계를 통일한다)

Huh Kyung-young Saturday Lecture (2016.12.03)

1. Keyword Frequency

• President: 40
• Korea: 26
• People: 25
• Woman: 20
• Money: 19
• Trump: 16
• Family: 15
• Life: 14
• Economy: 13
• National: 13

2. Today’s Central Metaphor
   The lecture uses the metaphor of diverging paths in life, comparing it to the different outcomes of individuals starting from the same point, and extends this to the national level by interpreting the Taegeukgi (Korean flag) and its trigrams as symbolic of marital harmony or discord, directly linking it to the nation’s prosperity or decline.

3. Lecture in Numbers

• 4 years ago: The speaker claims to have predicted President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils.
• 1 year and 2 months ago: The speaker claims to have predicted Trump’s election.
• 90%: The speaker predicts he will be elected president with 90% of the vote.
• 150 million won: Proposed monthly dividend per person aged 20 or older.
• 20 billion won: Amount a family of four would receive from Huh Kyung-young if he were elected.
• 14 years old: Proposed minimum voting age.
• 13 million won: Amount of money lost and found in a news story.
• 37 million won: Additional amount donated by the person who found the money.
• 50 million won: Total amount donated by the person who found the money.
• 76 million won: Amount of money lost from a moving truck, found by the speaker.
• 11th and 12th: Refers to specific hexagrams in the I Ching (Juyeok).
• 64: The total number of hexagrams in the I Ching.
• 2016: The year of the lecture, also the year Park Geun-hye faced issues according to the speaker’s astrological analysis.
• 200,000: Number of people in Korea with a similar “revolutionary” Saju (four pillars of destiny) as Park Chung-hee.
• 1,500 trillion won: Total household debt in Korea.
• 2 billion won: Proposed housing fund for newlyweds.
• 700,000 won: Proposed monthly payment for people aged 65 or older.
• 6 years: Duration of music exams for university admission in the proposed system.
• 5,000 points: Total score for music exams for Seoul National University admission.
• 1917: Birth year of President Park Chung-hee.
• 1951: Birth year of President Park Geun-hye.
• 40%: Korea’s national debt ratio.
• 2-3% to 5%: Increase in interest rates on household debt.
• 40 years: Duration of friendship between President Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil.
• 1055th: The current lecture number in Huh Kyung-young’s series.
• 25 years: Time since Huh Kyung-young made predictions about Korea.
• 50%: Proposed reduction in national budget to be distributed to citizens.
• 93%: Percentage of Koreans who supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US election.
• 7%: Percentage of Koreans who supported Donald Trump in the 2016 US election.
• 0.1%: Initial poll numbers for Trump, and predicted initial poll numbers for Huh Kyung-young.
• 10%, 30%, 50%: Predicted progression of Huh Kyung-young’s poll numbers.
• 16: Number of Republican candidates Trump was initially competing against.
• 19th: Refers to the 19th President of South Korea.
• 1 hour 30 minutes: Duration of the speaker’s radio broadcast on TBS.
• 3: Number of times the speaker appeared on TBS radio.
• 100: Number of new National Assembly members proposed by the speaker.
• 76 billion won: Amount of money for the Mir and K-Sports foundations.

4. Signature Sentence
   “어쩌면 우리가 주목해야 할 것은 허경영 사실이 아니라, 이런 개소문까지 나올 만큼 국민들을 만족시켜 줄 일꾼이 없다는 사실에 슬퍼해야만 할지도 모릅니다.” (Perhaps what we should pay attention to is not the fact of Huh Kyung-young, but the fact that there is no leader who can satisfy the people to the extent that such rumors are circulating, and we should perhaps be sad about that.)

5. Concise Summary & Highlights
   This lecture argues that Korea faces national crisis due to poor leadership, misinterpretation of traditional symbols, and a lack of spiritual insight.

• Huh Kyung-young claims to have accurately predicted major political events, including Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Trump’s election.
• He proposes radical policies like monthly basic income, debt relief, and educational reform to revitalize the economy and society.
• The speaker criticizes the current Taegeukgi (Korean flag) and the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House) for bringing misfortune, advocating for changes based on I Ching principles.
• He criticizes the media for focusing on trivial issues and lacking a “global mindset,” citing an incident where Korean reporters failed to ask questions to Obama.
• Huh Kyung-young positions himself as the only leader with the “spiritual insight” necessary to save Korea from its current predicament and unify the world.

6. Scriptural / Religious Citations

• Cheonbugyeong (천부경) and Juyeok (주역 – I Ching): The speaker references these texts to explain the symbolism of the Korean flag and the importance of female leadership.
  • “우리나라 태극기가 이렇게 생겼죠? 맞죠? 이렇게 생겼죠? 이게 무슨 색깔이야 이거는 남편이고, 이거는 하늘이고, 땅이라는 거야. 맞아? 맞아요. 이거는 남편, 하늘, 이게 근이야, 근. 이게 근인데 이 근을 여기다 해놨어. 고온을 여기다 해놓고 그 다음에 이거는 뭐예요? 감 여기 뭐예요? 요렇게 해놨단 말이에요. 그래 안 그래? 그러면 태극기 봉헌 여기에 있어. 그렇죠? 그럼 이거는 나라 망하는 거야. 이것이 위에 있고 여자가 밑에 있으면 이거 여자야. 이게 아내죠. 그렇죠? 이게 남편이야. 그러면 이게 여기 있으면 그냥 나라가 망해. 이게 여기 있으면 이게 위로 가야 돼. 청이 일로 가야 되고 이게 내려와야 되는 거야. 왜냐하면 지역에서 이것이 무슨 계입니까? 요것이 주역에서 이게 무슨 개죠? 천지비괘 그러니까 이건 천이잖아. 이건 지잖아. 천지비괘는 패망이야. 패망 패망 망조가 남자가 위에 있으면 남자 기운을 위로 가 안 가요. 음기운은 내려와. 그러면 부부가 만날 기한 시간이 있나 없나? 이거는 위로로 내려와. 자식도 기여지고 맨날 부부싸움이야. 그리고 이게 우리나라가 태극기가 이렇게 부부싸움을 남북 싸움을 하게 만들어 놨어요. 이게 하늘에 있잖아. 이게 땅에 있잖아. 이게 뒤바뀌어야 돼. 위에가 음이 있으면 그래서 이게 무슨 계입니까? 요거 요거 요거 얘가 여자가 있죠. 그렇죠? 이게 이게 주역의 11번째 괴고 이게 12번째 괴예요. 맞아? 맞아요. 이거는 이거는 땅이 먼저고 그 다음 하늘이야. 그래 안 그래요? 그러면 뭐가 돼요? 태평시대가 오는 거야. 맞아 맞아 지천태괘라 그래. 그러면 주역을 배운 사람은 이렇게 태극기를 만들면 나라가 망하는 거예요.”
  • “나는 뭐 오만가지를 다, 우주의 모든 학문을 모르는 게 없지만, 내가 초등학교 들어가기 전에 이 주역을 다 뗐다 이 말이야.”
  • “이게 주역에 제일 처음에 나오는 거 이게 뭡니까? 제일 처음에 나오는 거 이런 교회가 있어요. 이런 교회나 두 번째 나오는 주역의 개가 요런 교회가 있어요. 이런 교회는 이런 교회는 여기 남자가 있고, 남자가 둘이 있는 형국이죠. 이건 여자가 둘이 같이 있는 행궁이죠. 이게 지역의 제일 첫 번째, 두 번째 나온 개고 요게 11번째, 요게 12번째 나옵니다.”
• Jesus and Buddha: The speaker claims his name has unique spiritual power, surpassing that of Jesus and Buddha.
  • “허경영과 예수와 석가모니 중에 마음속으로 해서 누군지를 모르게 아무나 한 사람 시작 그거는 예수님 자, 석가모니 예, 예 마음속으로 해도 안 떨어져 이 지구상에서 내 이름만 그래 그러면 내 사진만 보면 그래요 여러분 사진은 그냥 부처님도 떨어지고 예수님도 떨어진다 허경영을 부르면 병이 일단 좋아져 그리고 내가 직접 보면은 고치고 그러니까 특사죠 그러니까 내가 여러분처럼 잉태된 사람은 아닌데, 나는 종교를 싫어해 교회를 가도 괜찮고, 절에 가도 괜찮고, 목사님도 좋고, 스님도 좋고, 다 좋아요 다 좋은 일 하는 분들이니까 그러나 보면서 예수님의 기도합니다 아멘 그리고 허경영해야 된다는 있어요 이렇게 깨세요 자, 본인 이름 불러봐요 시작 그거는 예수 예, 맞습니다 그다음 또 시작 자, 석가모니 예, 맞습니다 그리고 내 사진만 보면 그래요 여러분 사진은 그냥 부처님 상에서 병이 일단 좋아져요 그리고 내가 직접 보면은 특사죠 그러니까 내가 여러분처럼 잉태된 사람은 아닌데, 나는 종교를 싫어해 우선인지 알겠죠? 그냥 종교들은 좋아하는데, 불교들을 좋아하는데 종교 행위를 싫어한단 말이야 이제는 호갱님만 부르면 되는 거야 교회를 가도 괜찮고, 절에 가도 괜찮고, 목사님도 좋고, 스님도 좋고, 다 좋아요 다 좋은 일하는 분들이니까, 그러나 보면서 예수님의 이름으로 기도합니다 아멘 그리고 허경영해야 된다는 겁니다 나무아미타불 하고 세계 통일이라고 나서 가요 나는 위에서 왔고 여러분 같은 몸을 가지고 왔지만, 여러분하고 에너지가 반대야 그러나 여기서만 이렇게 되는 게 아니고 집에 가서 해도 마찬가지야 그러니까 나를 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가, 거꾸로 그러니까 덜 늙죠 그러니까 수명이 길어져 알겠죠? 나를 안 불렀으니까 나이를 잡은 거지 알겠죠?”

7. Historical & Epochal Context
   The lecture is situated in a period of significant political turmoil in South Korea, specifically during the Park Geun-hye impeachment crisis and the candlelight vigils of 2016. It also references the recent US presidential election where Donald Trump was elected. The speaker frames these events as symptoms of deeper national issues, including:

• Political Corruption and Incompetence: The lecture repeatedly criticizes past and present politicians for corruption, mismanagement of the economy, and failure to address household debt.
• Economic Stagnation: The speaker highlights the burden of 1,500 trillion won in household debt, rising interest rates, and a lack of economic growth, leading to public dissatisfaction.
• Media Bias and Lack of Global Perspective: The media is accused of sensationalism, misrepresentation, and a narrow focus on domestic scandals, neglecting broader international issues.
• Erosion of Traditional Values: The speaker connects national misfortune to a perceived disrespect for women and a misinterpretation of traditional symbols like the Taegeukgi, which he claims brings “bad luck.”
• Crisis of Leadership: A central theme is the absence of “spiritually insightful” leaders capable of guiding the nation, contrasting current politicians with the speaker’s own perceived abilities.
• Social Discontent: The candlelight vigils are presented not just as a reaction to Choi Soon-sil but also as an expression of deep-seated economic frustration among the populace, especially the youth.

8. Key Figures & Events Referenced

• Park Geun-hye: Former President of South Korea, subject of impeachment proceedings and candlelight vigils. The speaker claims to have predicted her downfall.
• Choi Soon-sil: Central figure in the political scandal involving Park Geun-hye, accused of influence peddling.
• Jung Yoo-ra: Choi Soon-sil’s daughter, also involved in the scandal.
• Donald Trump: US President-elect at the time of the lecture. The speaker claims to have predicted his victory.
• Hillary Clinton: Trump’s opponent in the US presidential election. The speaker warned against her presidency, predicting war on the Korean Peninsula.
• Park Chung-hee: Former President of South Korea and Park Geun-hye’s father. His Saju (four pillars of destiny) is analyzed.
• Yuk Young-soo: Park Chung-hee’s wife.
• Roh Moo-hyun: Former President of South Korea, mentioned in the context of youth voter turnout and his suicide.
• Lee Myung-bak: Former President of South Korea, his brother is mentioned in the context of corruption.
• Ban Ki-moon: Former UN Secretary-General, mentioned as a potential presidential candidate, described as a “tree frog.”
• Ahn Cheol-soo: Politician, described as a “goat” for his tendency to “sulk.”
• Moon Jae-in: Politician, described as an “ox” who works hard but is ultimately exploited.
• Lee Jae-myung: Mayor of Seongnam, mentioned as someone who respects Huh Kyung-young and acknowledges his views on corruption.
• Obama: Former US President, praised for recognizing Korean heroes (Park Ji-young, Choi Hye-jung) and criticized for the lack of “global mindset” among Korean reporters.
• Park Ji-young: Female crew member of the Sewol ferry who sacrificed her life to save students.
• Choi Hye-jung: Female teacher who sacrificed her life to save students during an incident (likely the Sewol ferry disaster, though not explicitly stated).
• Kim Dae-jung: Former President of South Korea, mentioned in the context of a supporter who changed allegiance from Kim Dae-jung to Park Chung-hee after reading Huh Kyung-young’s book.
• Min Byung-doo: Strategist for the Democratic Party, quoted as saying that Korea needs a bold candidate like Huh Kyung-young.
• Hayek: Economist, whose “microeconomics” approach was adopted by Deng Xiaoping.
• Deng Xiaoping: Former leader of China, who invited Hayek to Beijing in 1978 to learn how to alleviate poverty.
• Margaret Thatcher: Former Prime Minister of the UK, associated with microeconomics.
• Ronald Reagan: Former US President, associated with microeconomics.
• Guan Zhong (관중) and Bao Shuya (포숙아): Figures from Chinese history, used to illustrate the importance of friendship and trust in leadership, contrasting with the Park Geun-hye/Choi Soon-sil relationship.
• Lee Jung-hee: Politician, mentioned for her strong criticism of Park Geun-hye during a TV debate.
• Unified Progressive Party (통진당): A political party that was dissolved by the Constitutional Court, cited as an example of overly fast judicial process.
• Mir Foundation and K-Sports Foundation: Foundations at the center of the Choi Soon-sil scandal, criticized for their rapid establishment.
• Hanjin Shipping: Shipping company that faced bankruptcy, used as an example of the government’s failure to address economic issues.
• Vietnamese War: The speaker mentions escaping Vietnam during its fall, witnessing political instability.

9. Core Concept Definitions

• Success and Failure (성공과 실패): Two diverging paths in life, initially indistinguishable but leading to vastly different outcomes over time. The choice of path, such as attending the lecture versus protesting, determines one’s destiny.
• Energy (에너지): The fundamental output of the body’s systems, particularly the stomach, which processes food and blood to create it. The heart, in contrast, only moves blood, not creates energy.
• Spiritual Insight (영성): A superior form of perception that allows one to foresee future events and understand the true nature of things, unlike mere prophecy or fortune-telling. This is presented as a crucial quality for a leader.
• Taegeukgi (태극기): The Korean national flag. The speaker interprets its trigrams (괘) based on Juyeok (I Ching) principles. He argues that the current arrangement, with the male (heaven) trigram above the female (earth) trigram, represents “Cheonjibi-gwae” (천지비괘), symbolizing national ruin and discord. He advocates for “Jicheontae-gwae” (지천태괘), where the female (earth) trigram is above, symbolizing peace and prosperity.
• Mugeuk (무극): The ultimate void or non-duality in Eastern philosophy, represented by a simple circle. The speaker claims Japan’s flag (a red circle) embodies Mugeuk, making it a powerful symbol, whereas the Taegeuk (태극) symbol (the yin-yang) is “zero points” in comparison.
• Wonjinsal (원진살): An astrological concept in Saju (four pillars of destiny) indicating a difficult or conflicting relationship, often leading to misfortune. The speaker uses it to explain Park Geun-hye’s troubles in 2016.
• Insin-sa-hae (인신사해): A specific combination of earthly branches in Saju, indicating a person destined for revolution or drastic change. Attributed to Park Chung-hee.
• Seolsanggasang (설상가상): A Korean idiom meaning “adding frost to snow,” or “making matters worse.” Used to describe the piling up of problems for Park Geun-hye.
• Global Mindset (글로벌 마인드): The ability to view issues from an international or broad perspective, contrasted with a “microscopic mindset” that focuses only on narrow domestic concerns.
• Macroeconomics (거시 경제): State-led economic policies, exemplified by Keynesian economics and the government’s role in managing large-scale economic issues like corporate restructuring.
• Microeconomics (미시 경제): Market-led economic policies, exemplified by Thatcher, Reagan, and Deng Xiaoping’s reforms, focusing on individual economic actors and market mechanisms.
• Yeonhyeok (연혁) / Process (과정): The sequence of events or steps taken to achieve a result. The speaker argues that the process of establishing foundations (Mir, K-Sports) was flawed and too fast, leading to public distrust, even if the outcome (result) was not directly corrupt.
• Gwinap (귀납) / Result (결과): The outcome or conclusion of a process. The speaker states that the public cares less about the result than the process.
• Emotion (감성): Feelings or sentiments, which the speaker argues should be controlled by reason.
• Reason (이성): Rational thought, which the speaker argues should be controlled by spiritual insight.
• Filial Piety (효도): The virtue of respect for one’s parents and elders. The speaker discusses three types:
  • Muljilhyo (물질효): Material filial piety (providing for parents).
  • Simhyo (심효): Filial piety of the heart (caring for parents’ emotional well-being, marrying and having grandchildren).
  • Daehyo (대효): Great filial piety (bringing honor to the family name through personal achievement). The speaker suggests Park Geun-hye failed in this regard.
• Banpojihyo (반포지효): The filial piety of crows, where young crows feed their elderly parents. Used as an analogy for basic filial duty.
• Saengjonjihyo (생존지효): Filial piety shown while parents are alive.
• Sahujihyo (사후지효): Filial piety shown after parents have passed away, by honoring their memory and legacy. The speaker suggests Park Geun-hye failed in this.
• Gwanpojigyo (관포지교): The deep friendship between Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya in ancient China, used to illustrate trust and loyalty, contrasting with the Park Geun-hye/Choi Soon-sil relationship.

10. Central Questions & Answers

• Central Question: How can South Korea overcome its current political, economic, and social crises and achieve true prosperity and global leadership?
• Speaker’s Answer:
  • Leadership with Spiritual Insight: The nation needs a leader with “spiritual insight” (like Huh Kyung-young) who can foresee events, understand the true nature of problems, and make decisions beyond conventional reason or emotion.
  • Radical Policy Reforms: Implement policies such as a universal basic income, comprehensive household debt relief, and educational reform to stimulate the economy and improve citizens’ quality of life.
  • Symbolic and Cultural Correction: Rectify national symbols like the Taegeukgi and the name of the presidential residence (Cheong Wa Dae) to align with principles of harmony and prosperity, and promote respect for women.
  • Global Perspective and Media Responsibility: The media and public must adopt a “global mindset” and focus on substantive issues rather than sensationalism, to avoid being manipulated and to accurately assess national and international affairs.
  • Moral and Ethical Leadership: Leaders must embody true filial piety, integrity, and a willingness to sacrifice for the nation, unlike past and present politicians perceived as corrupt or self-serving.

11. Conclusion & Strategic / Philosophical Implications
    The lecture concludes with a demonstration of Huh Kyung-young’s alleged supernatural powers, claiming that merely calling his name or looking at his picture can heal illnesses and reverse aging. He asserts that he is not an ordinary human but a being from “above” with unique energy, implying that his leadership would bring about a new era of health and prosperity.

The strategic and philosophical implications are:

• Messianic Leadership: The speaker positions himself as a quasi-divine figure, a “special envoy” who transcends human limitations and conventional politics, offering a spiritual solution to national problems. This implies a shift from secular governance to a form of spiritual leadership.
• Rejection of Traditional Institutions: He dismisses traditional religions and political systems as inadequate, suggesting that only his direct intervention and unique powers can save the nation.
• Individual Transformation as National Salvation: The focus on individual healing and longevity through his name implies that personal well-being is directly linked to his presence and influence, and by extension, national well-being.
• Critique of Modernity: The lecture implicitly criticizes modern society’s reliance on reason and emotion, advocating for “spiritual insight” as the ultimate guide for governance and personal life.
• Call for Unquestioning Faith: The demonstrations of power serve to cultivate belief in his extraordinary abilities, suggesting that faith in him is the path to personal and national salvation.

12. Cross-Referencing

• Other works/lectures by the same speaker: The speaker frequently references his past predictions (e.g., Park Geun-hye’s impeachment, Trump’s election) as evidence of his “spiritual insight.” He also mentions his numerous previous lectures (this being the 1055th) and his books.
• Related theories, books, or research:
  • I Ching (Juyeok): The speaker extensively uses I Ching principles to interpret the Korean flag and predict national fortunes.
  • Saju (Four Pillars of Destiny): He analyzes the Saju of Park Geun-hye and Park Chung-hee to explain their destinies and current events.
  • Keynesian Economics: Mentioned as “macroeconomics” and associated with the US facing the Great Depression.
  • Hayek’s Microeconomics: Referenced as the economic theory adopted by Deng Xiaoping to lift China out of poverty.
  • Philosophical concepts: The speaker discusses concepts like “Mugeuk” (non-duality) and “Taegeuk” (yin-yang) in relation to national flags.
• Historical parallels or precedents:
  • Fall of Vietnam: The speaker references his experience escaping Vietnam during its fall, drawing parallels to potential instability in Korea.
  • US Presidential Elections: The 2016 US election (Trump vs. Hillary) is a major point of reference, with the speaker claiming to have predicted the outcome and its implications for Korea.
  • Past Korean Presidents’ Corruption: The speaker frequently compares the Choi Soon-sil scandal to alleged larger-scale corruption by previous male presidents and their families.
  • Napoleon: Mentioned by the guest speaker as an example of a leader whose era created him, implying Huh Kyung-young is a similar figure for the current times.

13. Multilingual Translation Strategy
    To produce high-quality translations for this content, a multi-stage workflow is recommended:

14. Initial Machine Translation (MT) with Contextual Awareness:

• Use a robust MT engine (e.g., DeepL, Google Translate) for a first pass, but specifically train or fine-tune it with a glossary of political, philosophical, and cultural terms frequently used by Huh Kyung-young (e.g., “spiritual insight,” “Taegeukgi,” “Saju,” “Cheon Wa Dae,” “Juyeok,” specific policy names).
• Ensure the MT engine is aware of the speaker’s unique style, which often blends formal and informal language, and includes rhetorical questions and direct address to the audience.

2. Human Post-Editing by Domain Experts:

• First Pass (Korean Native Speaker with English Fluency): A Korean native speaker who is highly proficient in English and familiar with Korean political discourse and traditional philosophy should review the MT output. This person would correct grammatical errors, awkward phrasing, and ensure cultural nuances are accurately conveyed. They would also verify the correct spelling of proper nouns (e.g., “Huh Kyung-young,” “Park Geun-hye”).
• Second Pass (English Native Speaker with Korean Understanding): An English native speaker with a good understanding of Korean culture and politics would then refine the text for natural flow, idiomatic expressions, and clarity for an English-speaking audience. This person would also check for any remaining ambiguities or misinterpretations.

3. Verification of Specific Terminology and Citations:

• Specialized Review: A separate review should be conducted for all technical terms (e.g., Saju, I Ching hexagrams), historical events, and names of individuals to ensure accuracy and consistency.
• Scriptural/Philosophical References: Any references to Cheonbugyeong, Juyeok, or other philosophical texts should be cross-referenced with established English translations of those texts to ensure the quoted passages or interpretations are consistent and accurate.

4. Quality Assurance and Style Guide Adherence:

• Final Proofread: A final proofread to catch any remaining typos, punctuation errors, and ensure adherence to a consistent style guide (e.g., formal, academic English, as requested).
• Contextual Notes: For highly culture-specific concepts or analogies (e.g., the Taegeukgi interpretation, specific idioms), consider adding brief, unobtrusive contextual notes or explanations to enhance understanding for a global audience.

This workflow prioritizes accuracy, cultural fidelity, and natural language, addressing the challenges of automatic translation for complex and culturally rich content.

14. Content Gaps & Unaddressed Areas

• Feasibility of Policy Proposals: While bold economic policies like monthly dividends and debt relief are proposed, the detailed financial mechanisms and their long-term sustainability are not thoroughly explained. The source of the “50% national budget savings” is mentioned but lacks specific breakdown.
• Constitutional and Legal Framework for Reforms: The speaker proposes drastic changes, such as reducing the number of National Assembly members to 100 and allowing 14-year-olds to vote, without detailing the constitutional amendment process or legal challenges involved. His claim that President Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution, despite widespread legal consensus to the contrary, lacks supporting legal argument.
• Evidence for Supernatural Claims: The lecture concludes with demonstrations of alleged healing and energy transfer, but these lack scientific evidence or independent verification. The mechanism by which calling his name or viewing his photo can reverse aging or cure illness is not explained beyond “energy.”
• Historical Accuracy and Context: Some historical interpretations, such as the claim that the Taegeukgi was “wrongly made” by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, or that the Japanese intentionally designed it to bring misfortune to Korea, are presented as facts without historical evidence.
• Addressing Counterarguments: The speaker acknowledges that some of his proposals might seem “absurd” or “like rumors” to the public, but he does not engage with specific counterarguments or criticisms in a substantive way, instead dismissing them as a lack of “spiritual insight.”
• Specifics of “World Unification”: The lecture mentions “world unification” as a goal, but provides no details on how this would be achieved or what such a unified world would entail under his leadership.
• Definition of “Spiritual Insight”: While “spiritual insight” is presented as a crucial quality, its precise definition, how it is acquired, and how it translates into practical governance are not fully elaborated.

15. Future Predictions & Prophetic Statements

• Huh Kyung-young’s Presidency and World Unification:
  • He will be elected president with 90% of the vote, after starting with 0.1% in polls, then rising to 10%, 30%, and 50%.
  • Upon election, he will declare martial law, dismiss current National Assembly members, and establish a new 100-member assembly to implement his policies.
  • He will unify the world.
• Park Geun-hye’s Downfall:
  • He predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils 4 years prior to the lecture (around 2012).
  • He predicted that Park Geun-hye would not be able to overcome 2016 due to “Wonjinsal” in her Saju, leading to her “most shameful disgrace” in Korean history.
  • He stated that Park Geun-hye would eventually step down, even if people did not protest, and Choi Soon-sil would go to jail.
• Trump’s Presidency:
  • He predicted Trump’s election 1 year and 2 months prior to the lecture (around October 2015).
  • He stated that Trump would be the US President, despite being last among 16 Republican candidates.
  • He warned that if Hillary Clinton became president, there would be war on the Korean Peninsula.
• Future of Korea without Huh Kyung-young:
  • If Park Geun-hye steps down quickly and a leader without “spiritual insight” takes over, Korea will face severe danger, its economy will be ruined, and its youth will become “servants” to China.
• Impact of Huh Kyung-young’s Name and Presence:
  • Calling his name or looking at his picture will heal illnesses and reverse aging, extending lifespan.
  • He will eliminate household debt, provide monthly dividends of 1.5 million won, and give 200 million won for housing to newlyweds.
  • He will abolish the college entrance exam (Suneung) and introduce a new education system where students are evaluated based on 6 years of specialized subject performance.
  • He will lower the voting age to 14, making voting mandatory for middle schoolers, with penalties for non-participation affecting university admission.

Executive Insight
This lecture by Huh Kyung-young offers a unique blend of political commentary, spiritual claims, and radical policy proposals, framed within the context of South Korea’s 2016 political crisis. The core takeaway is his self-positioning as the sole leader possessing “spiritual insight” capable of saving the nation from its perceived decline. He critiques existing political and economic systems, proposing a transformative agenda that includes universal basic income, debt relief, and educational reform, while also advocating for symbolic changes to national emblems based on traditional philosophical interpretations. The lecture’s emphasis on his prophetic abilities and alleged supernatural powers serves to establish his authority as a messianic figure, suggesting that conventional political solutions are insufficient for Korea’s deep-seated problems. This analysis reveals a strategic attempt to capitalize on public disillusionment by offering a charismatic, unconventional alternative rooted in both populist promises and spiritual authority.

Heo Kyung-young claims he predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Trump’s election years in advance, asserting these were not mere predictions but spiritual insights. He then outlines his vision for becoming president with 90% of the vote and unifying the world, detailing policies like universal basic income and debt relief.

1. Heo Kyung-young’s Predictions and Vision for Korea
   Heo Kyung-young claims to have predicted major political events, including Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Donald Trump’s election, and outlines his plan to become president with 90% of the vote by implementing policies like universal basic income and debt relief.

1.1. The Path to Success and Spiritual Insight

1. Heo Kyung-young believes that choosing to attend his lecture, rather than participating in protests, leads to future success, even if there’s no immediate benefit .
2. He compares this to two people starting at the same point, where one chooses a path of success (like studying) and the other chooses a path of failure (like getting sidetracked) .
3. He uses an analogy of the body’s organs and blood circulation to explain that following the correct path is crucial for a healthy life, just as choosing the right path in youth determines one’s future .
4. He claims to have predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment four years prior and Donald Trump’s election one year and two months prior .
5. He emphasizes that these were not mere predictions but insights gained through spiritual vision, which differs from ordinary foresight .
6. He states that such predictions should not be openly discussed until they materialize, as he kept Trump’s victory a secret until it happened .

1.2. Presidential Ambition and Policy Proposals

1. Heo Kyung-young envisions becoming president with 90% of the vote and unifying the world .

2. He expects initial poll numbers to be low, like Trump’s 0.1%, but believes they will rise to 90% after he presents his policies in a televised debate .

3. His key policy proposals include:

4. Providing a monthly allowance of 1.5 million won to every citizen over 20 years old, ensuring no one worries about money and making 100% of Koreans middle class .

5. Funding these initiatives by selling off unnecessary state-owned assets, such as land and buildings, to directly benefit the public .

6. He believes that the public will strongly support him because his policies offer tangible financial benefits, contrasting with current politicians who are perceived as mismanaging funds .

7. He suggests that recent events, like the Choi Soon-sil scandal, will motivate young people to vote, unlike in the past .

8. He proposes lowering the voting age to 14 to teach democracy early, making voting mandatory for middle schoolers by linking it to academic performance and university admission .

9. He argues that this would increase overall voter turnout, as parents would bring their children to vote .

10. Upon becoming president, he plans to declare martial law, dismiss current National Assembly members, and elect 100 new ones to implement his policies effectively, preventing the kind of political gridlock that led to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment .

11. Societal Issues and Political Analysis
    Heo Kyung-young discusses various societal issues, including acts of honesty, the importance of respecting women, and a critical analysis of the Korean flag and traditional gender roles, linking these to national prosperity and political stability.

2.1. Acts of Honesty and Respect for Women

1. He recounts a news story about a young man who found 13 million won and reported it to the police, leading the owner to donate 37 million won more to charity out of gratitude .
2. He shares a personal anecdote about finding 76 million won that fell from a moving truck and returning it to the owner, who was using it for a housing deposit .
3. He emphasizes that the woman was so relieved she cried, highlighting the importance of such a large sum for her family’s housing .
4. He stresses the importance of respecting women, stating that households that disrespect women do not prosper, while those that treat women well thrive .

2.2. Critique of the Korean Flag and Traditional Gender Roles

1. He criticizes the design of the Korean flag (Taegeukgi), arguing that its arrangement of trigrams (Gwae) symbolizes national decline .

2. He explains that the current flag places the male principle (heaven) above the female principle (earth), which in I Ching (Juyeok), represents the “Cheonjibi-gwae” (Heaven and Earth Obstructed), signifying failure and conflict .

3. He contrasts this with the “Jicheontae-gwae” (Earth and Heaven in Peace), where the female principle is above the male, symbolizing peace and prosperity, which he believes the flag should represent .

4. He suggests that the current flag’s design contributes to societal problems like high divorce rates and declining marriage rates .

5. He argues that women should hold positions of power and influence, citing historical examples where queens managed royal affairs and even held power over kings .

6. He attributes the downfall of the Joseon Dynasty to kings having multiple concubines, which he sees as disrespecting women and leading to national ruin .

7. He claims to have mastered the I Ching before elementary school, asserting that his understanding of natural laws prevents him from making wrong choices, such as consuming alcohol, tobacco, or coffee .

8. He further elaborates on the I Ching’s trigrams, explaining that the current Taegeukgi’s design is flawed and should be changed to reflect a more harmonious balance, similar to the “Hwasu Mije-gwae” (Fire and Water Not Yet Completed) which represents a state of balance .

9. He believes the flag was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan without proper understanding of the I Ching, leading to its current “unlucky” design .

10. He also notes that some Christians dislike the trigrams because they are associated with divination .

11. He contrasts the Taegeukgi with Japan’s flag, which he describes as “Mugeuk” (no polarity), representing the entire universe and thus being more powerful .

12. He concludes that the Taegeukgi’s design contributes to Korea’s division and weakness, and should be changed .

13. Analysis of Park Geun-hye’s Presidency and Political Landscape
    Heo Kyung-young analyzes Park Geun-hye’s presidency, attributing her downfall to astrological factors and societal overreaction to female-related scandals, while also criticizing the broader political landscape and the media’s focus.

3.1. Astrological and Societal Factors in Park Geun-hye’s Downfall

1. He suggests that society is overly harsh on women, particularly in the context of the Choi Soon-sil scandal, arguing that female-related offenses should be treated with more leniency compared to those committed by men .
2. He claims to have predicted Park Geun-hye’s downfall shortly after her election, based on her saju (four pillars of destiny) .
3. He explains that her birth year (Shinmyo-saeng) has a “wonjinsal” (a type of harmful clash) with the year 2016 (Byeongsin-nyeon), indicating that she would struggle to complete the year .
4. He warns that excessive protests could inadvertently aid North Korea, as the president would step down regardless, and the legal system would handle the situation .
5. He recounts his experience during the fall of Vietnam, where he observed that key figures were spies, drawing a parallel to potential hidden agendas in current protests .
6. He argues that Park Geun-hye’s personal saju was not inherently bad, but the year 2016 was particularly challenging for her .
7. He contrasts this with her father, Park Chung-hee’s saju, which included “insinsa-hae” (a combination of specific zodiac signs), indicating a revolutionary and powerful personality .
8. He emphasizes that while saju provides a small influence, factors like physiognomy (gwansang) and personal relationships (like meeting Yuk Young-soo) significantly alter one’s destiny .
9. He reiterates that Park Geun-hye’s “wonjinsal” in 2016 meant a period of great humiliation and eventual removal from power, even if she remained in the Blue House .
10. He advocates for a shift away from male-centric thinking, urging people not to escalate conflicts over women’s mistakes to the point of national crisis, reserving such intensity for external threats like Japan .

3.2. Defense of Park Geun-hye and Critique of Political Corruption

1. He defends Park Geun-hye, stating that she did not violate the constitution, despite accusations .

2. He argues that a president has broad economic powers, including the ability to issue emergency financial decrees and direct economic policies, such as promoting cultural projects or restructuring industries .

3. He claims that presidents can consult trusted friends on sensitive matters to avoid leaks, and that such actions do not constitute a constitutional violation .

4. He asserts that the president’s powers, including emergency financial orders, declarations of war, and pardons, are legitimate and should not be criticized when exercised .

5. He believes that only Choi Soon-sil should be punished, and that the president’s aides are not guilty of capital offenses .

6. He criticizes previous male presidents for accumulating massive household debt (1,500 trillion won) and engaging in widespread corruption, which he claims to have witnessed firsthand .

7. He contrasts this with Park Geun-hye, whom he believes is not a person who would embezzle state funds .

8. He acknowledges that relatives of past presidents, like Lee Myung-bak’s brother, were involved in corruption, but expresses sympathy for Lee Myung-bak’s personal struggles and hard work .

9. He concludes that the current focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-chasing” is a distraction from the much larger, astronomical sums of money embezzled by previous administrations .

10. He suggests that attending his lecture is more beneficial than participating in protests, as it brings greater blessings .

11. Political Figures, Economic Policies, and Media Criticism
    Heo Kyung-young evaluates various political figures, proposes radical economic policies to address national debt and stimulate growth, and criticizes the Korean media for its narrow focus and sensationalism.

4.1. Evaluation of Political Figures and Proposed Economic Reforms

1. He critiques current political figures using animal analogies:
2. Ban Ki-moon is a “tree frog” (cheonggaeguri), implying he jumps around without clear direction .
3. Ahn Cheol-soo is a “goat,” suggesting he is easily offended and prone to leaving his party .
4. Moon Jae-in is an “ox,” implying he works hard but is ultimately exploited and discarded .
5. He highlights that Lee Jae-myung, the mayor of Seongnam, respects him and agrees with his assessment that Korea’s financial problems stem from “thieves” rather than a lack of money .
6. He describes Lee Jae-myung as an “Imugi” (a mythical serpent that aspires to be a dragon but faces constant obstacles), suggesting he will never reach the presidency .
7. He notes that Lee Jae-myung’s popularity among youth stems from policies like youth allowances, which align with his own ideas .
8. He proposes radical economic policies to alleviate household debt and stimulate the economy:
9. He plans to eliminate household debt by having the government repay loans under 500 million won, funded by selling state-owned enterprises and real estate .
10. For debts over 500 million won, the government would cover the interest payments .
11. He argues that this would free up citizens’ money for consumption, boosting the economy .
12. He also proposes eliminating the Suneung (college entrance exam) and replacing it with a system where students are evaluated based on their performance in a single specialized subject over six years, which would reduce private education expenses and further stimulate the economy .

4.2. Astrological Connections and Media Criticism

1. He connects Park Geun-hye’s troubles in 2016 to her father, Park Chung-hee’s birth year (Year of the Monkey), suggesting that the “Year of the Monkey” brought misfortune to his daughter .
2. He points to incidents like the fire at Park Chung-hee’s birthplace and the Seomun Market fire as manifestations of this misfortune .
3. He views Park Geun-hye’s actions as bringing shame to her parents’ legacy .
4. He criticizes the Korean media for sensationalizing issues and misleading the public .
5. He uses the example of the US beef controversy, where media reports falsely claimed US beef was dangerous, leading to widespread protests, while Korean beef was often raised with antibiotics .
6. He recounts an incident where President Obama asked for questions from Korean journalists, but none came forward, highlighting their lack of global perspective .
7. He notes that a Chinese journalist eventually stepped in to ask a question on behalf of Asia, further underscoring the Korean media’s narrow focus .
8. He criticizes the media for fabricating stories about him, such as denying his meeting with President Bush, which was later proven true .
9. He argues that the media’s focus on trivial matters like the Choi Soon-sil scandal distracts from larger issues and a global mindset .
10. He contrasts the media’s treatment of Choi Soon-sil with past corruption involving presidential family members, which he claims was handled with more leniency .
11. He suggests that the public’s outrage over Choi Soon-sil, a non-family friend, is disproportionate, and that the president might not have been fully aware of her actions .
12. He believes the media’s portrayal of Park Geun-hye as orchestrating corruption is a fabrication .
13. He concludes that the Korean media’s obsession with the Choi Soon-sil scandal prevents them from addressing broader national and international issues, making them appear incompetent on the global stage .

4.3. Heroism, National Symbols, and Economic Approaches

1. He praises President Obama for recognizing the heroism of Park Ji-young, a female crew member who died saving students during the Sewol Ferry disaster, by awarding her a gold medal and issuing a commemorative stamp .

2. He contrasts this with the male crew members who fled, and criticizes Korea for not similarly honoring its heroes .

3. He also commends Choi Hye-jung, a female teacher who died saving students in the same incident, and calls for both women to be honored in textbooks and their families to receive pensions .

4. He criticizes Korean men for their lack of responsibility and suggests that his presidency would prevent such incidents .

5. He reiterates his criticism of the Taegeukgi and the name of the Blue House (Cheong Wa Dae) .

6. He argues that “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House) is an inappropriate name because “blue collar” is associated with prisoners and laborers, whereas the US White House symbolizes wealth .

7. He proposes renaming the Blue House to “Haneulgung” (Heavenly Palace), symbolizing the “children of the Korean people” .

8. He discusses different economic approaches:

9. Macroeconomics (Geosi Gyeongje), which is state-led, like Keynesian economics that led to the Great Depression in the US .

10. Microeconomics (Misi Gyeongje), which is market-led, exemplified by Margaret Thatcher in the UK, Ronald Reagan in the US, and Deng Xiaoping in China .

11. He notes that China’s economic success began after Deng Xiaoping adopted market-oriented reforms, allowing farmers to sell their produce .

12. He criticizes the current Korean government for raising interest rates on household debt, which is exacerbating the financial burden on citizens and hindering economic recovery .

13. He argues that this policy, intended to curb debt growth, actually forces people to take out more loans just to pay interest, leading to a vicious cycle .

14. He believes that many people participating in protests are doing so out of economic desperation, not just anger over the Choi Soon-sil scandal .

15. Critique of Government Processes and Future Political Landscape
    Heo Kyung-young criticizes the government’s lack of transparency and speed in certain processes, particularly regarding the dissolution of political parties and the creation of foundations, and discusses the future political landscape, emphasizing the need for a spiritual leader.

5.1. Government Inefficiency and Lack of Transparency

1. He criticizes the government’s handling of economic issues, such as the Hanjin Shipping crisis, where the Blue House failed to restructure struggling shipping companies, leading to global supply chain disruptions .
2. He points out the inconsistent speed of government processes:
3. The dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (Tongjin-dang) by the Constitutional Court was remarkably fast .
4. In contrast, the creation of government-led foundations like the Mir Foundation and K-Sports Foundation was also rushed, taking only a day, while citizen-initiated foundations take months .
5. He argues that this lack of due process and transparency, rather than outright theft, is what angers the public .
6. He highlights that investigations revealed meeting minutes for these foundations were fabricated, further fueling public distrust .
7. He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s actions, such as the swift dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party, were perceived as retaliation against Lee Jung-hee, who had harshly criticized her during a TV debate .
8. He believes that this “karma” led to Park Geun-hye’s own impeachment process .
9. He emphasizes that emotions should not dictate political decisions, and that spirituality (yeongseong) should guide leadership, as it allows for foresight beyond reason .

5.2. The Need for Spiritual Leadership and Filial Piety

1. He asserts that a spiritual leader is necessary for Korea’s future, as current politicians lack the foresight to navigate complex challenges .

2. He claims to have recognized Trump’s presidential potential when he was at the bottom of the polls, based on his “spiritual eye” .

3. He warns that if Park Geun-hye is removed prematurely, an unqualified leader could take power, leading to national ruin .

4. He sympathizes with Park Geun-hye’s difficult position, inheriting a nation burdened by debt and corruption, which forced her to initiate projects like the cultural enrichment program .

5. He discusses the concept of Banpojihyo (filial piety of crows), where crows feed their elderly parents, and contrasts it with human filial piety, which includes material support, emotional care, and bringing honor to one’s family .

6. He criticizes Park Geun-hye for bringing shame to her parents’ legacy, effectively doing the opposite of “daehyo” (great filial piety) .

7. He emphasizes the importance of remembering parents’ sacrifices and living modestly, which he believes Park Geun-hye failed to do .

8. He also highlights the importance of family harmony, noting that Park Geun-hye’s estrangement from her siblings fueled public suspicion about Choi Tae-min’s influence .

9. He reiterates the importance of process over outcome, citing the rapid dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations as examples of processes that lacked public understanding .

10. He advises against using power for revenge and encourages attributing good outcomes to others and bad outcomes to oneself .

11. He recounts the story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya (Gwanpojigyo), two friends from ancient China, where Bao Shuya recommended Guan Zhong, a former criminal, to the king as a capable minister .

12. He suggests that this story is similar to Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil, implying that while trust is important, it can lead to betrayal .

13. Endorsements, Media Recognition, and Healing Powers
    Heo Kyung-young receives endorsements from a visiting professor, gains increasing media recognition for his political predictions and proposals, and demonstrates his alleged healing powers to the audience.

6.1. Endorsements and Growing Media Recognition

1. A visiting philosophy professor from the US, David Jung, expresses his belief that Heo Kyung-young is the leader Korea needs, especially after observing the current political turmoil and finding other candidates, like Ban Ki-moon and Lee Jae-myung, unsuitable for the country’s unique situation .
2. The professor praises Heo Kyung-young’s extensive and unscripted lectures, noting his unique ability to speak on diverse topics without notes .
3. He compares Heo Kyung-young to historical figures like Napoleon, suggesting that the current era demands a leader willing to “die” for the nation, unlike other politicians who lack such resolve .
4. Heo Kyung-young reads a positive YouTube comment from a viewer in Montreal, praising his wisdom and insight into domestic and international issues, and stating that other presidential candidates are far inferior .
5. The commenter, who met several candidates, pledges to promote Heo Kyung-young among Koreans abroad .
6. He highlights increasing media recognition, including a Maeil Business Newspaper article quoting Min Byeong-doo, a Democratic Party strategist, who suggested that Korea might need a “Korean Trump” like Heo Kyung-young if the economy continues to worsen .
7. He also mentions a Korea Daily article that likened his potential presidency to Trump’s rise, and an opinion piece suggesting the Saenuri Party should recruit him .
8. He reiterates his prediction of Trump’s victory in 2015, when Trump was a long-shot candidate, and contrasts this with the media’s overwhelming support for Hillary Clinton .
9. He claims that his “spiritual eye” allowed him to see Trump’s presidential potential .
10. He warns that if an unqualified leader replaces Park Geun-hye, Korea’s youth will face hardship and the nation will be ruined .
11. He refers to online articles that predicted him as the 19th president, based on his past accurate predictions of events like Roh Moo-hyun’s suicide and Trump’s election .
12. These articles suggest that, like Trump, a “quirky” figure like Heo Kyung-young could become president, shocking the public .
13. He states that he prefers to run in a fair election rather than taking advantage of the current political turmoil .
14. He cites a Maeil Business Newspaper report from October 22, 2016, which stated that 93% of Koreans supported Hillary Clinton, while only 7% supported Trump .
15. He claims that he, Heo Kyung-young, was the one who ultimately influenced the outcome of the US presidential election .
16. He expresses his intention to run in the next presidential election, stating that he is too important to be involved in petty political squabbles .

6.2. Demonstrations of Healing and Spiritual Power

1. He demonstrates his alleged healing powers by having audience members try to resist his push while thinking of various figures (Jesus, Buddha, their own names) .
2. He claims that only when they think of his name, Heo Kyung-young, do they become strong enough to resist .
3. He states that merely calling his name can improve health, and seeing him directly can cure ailments .
4. He asserts that he is not an ordinary human but a special being with cosmic energy, and that his name has unique power .
5. He emphasizes that he is not associated with any specific religion and respects all faiths, but believes that calling his name is sufficient for healing .
6. He claims that calling his name before sleep can reverse aging and extend lifespan .
7. He performs a diagnostic and healing demonstration on an audience member, claiming to detect and cure various ailments .
8. He uses a technique where he pushes the person’s hand, claiming it will drop if there is an illness in a specific area .
9. He identifies issues in the person’s throat, thyroid, and brain, suggesting potential stroke risk .
10. After a brief intervention, he claims to have cured these issues, demonstrating that the person can now resist his push .
11. He states that his healing power works even remotely, through a phone screen .
12. He concludes by performing similar “healing” on other audience members, claiming to cure various conditions like breast cancer and joint problems .

1. The Prophetic Vision and the Path to National Salvation

Welcome to those who have come here today, especially those who chose this path over the demonstrations. This decision signifies a profound blessing. In life, two individuals may start from the same point, with similar backgrounds and circumstances. However, as time progresses, their paths diverge significantly. One might pursue a path of immediate gratification, while another invests in long-term wisdom. The latter, by choosing to engage with profound knowledge, will ultimately experience immense benefits, even if they are not immediately apparent. This is akin to a student who diligently studies, knowing that the rewards will multiply exponentially over time. Conversely, those who are swayed by fleeting distractions may find their lives derailed. Therefore, the choices made in one’s youth profoundly shape the trajectory of their entire life.

Just as the human body’s organs, like the heart, liver, lungs, and kidneys, work in a specific sequence to circulate blood and produce energy, life’s journey also has an optimal flow. If this natural order is disrupted, or if essential elements like proper nutrition are neglected, the entire system can falter. The heart circulates blood, but the stomach fundamentally produces the energy that sustains life. Similarly, choosing to seek wisdom and understanding, rather than being swept up in transient events, leads to a more prosperous future. Those who attend this lecture today are gaining insights that others, caught in the fervor of the moment, may miss.

I spoke of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years ago, and predicted Donald Trump’s election one year and two months ago. These were not mere predictions by a fortune teller; they stemmed from a spiritual insight that transcends ordinary perception. Such profound truths should not be casually disseminated. I only speak of these events now because they have come to pass. For instance, I stated that if Hillary Clinton were elected, war would erupt on the Korean Peninsula.

My vision extends to becoming president and unifying the world. Imagine a scenario where 90% of the 36 million eligible voters participate, and 90% of them elect me. Initially, polls might show me at 0.1%, like Trump. But as the election progresses, support would grow to 10%, then 30%, and eventually 50%. During televised debates, I would propose a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won for every citizen over 20, ensuring no one worries about money and 100% of the population becomes middle class. When people see my unwavering commitment to these promises, they will trust me implicitly. Even if it means selling off unnecessary state-owned assets, I will ensure these funds reach the people. This conviction will lead to a 90% voter turnout and my election.

The current political climate, particularly the scandal involving Choi Soon-sil and Chung Yoo-ra, will motivate young people to vote. Historically, youth turnout was low, except during the Roh Moo-hyun era. However, my candidacy will inspire them to participate. The era of revolution by force or military coups is over; now, change comes through the ballot box. I would even lower the voting age to 14, allowing middle school students to experience democracy firsthand. Their participation would be incentivized, with academic penalties for non-voters, ensuring parents encourage their children to vote, thereby increasing overall turnout. Empowering young people with voting rights would eliminate the need for private tutoring and allow them to choose leaders who prioritize their education and well-being.

With 90% voter turnout, I would secure 90% of the votes, even against ten other candidates. Upon election, I would declare a state of emergency, restructure the National Assembly, and establish a powerful new government with 100 dedicated representatives. This strong leadership is essential to implement my policies, unlike previous administrations that were swayed by political infighting. Our nation, under my leadership, will achieve world unification.

2. The Significance of Compassion and the Flaws in National Symbols
   Recently, I heard a story on television about a young man who found 13 million won in cash and reported it to the police. The owner, deeply moved, added 37 million won to the sum and donated 50 million won to charity. This act of integrity and subsequent generosity highlights the profound impact of compassion.

This reminds me of an incident eight years ago when I found 76 million won that had fallen from a moving truck. It was a family’s housing deposit, and without it, they would have been homeless. I chased the truck, enduring the driver’s initial anger, until I could return the money. The woman’s relief and tears were overwhelming. This experience underscores the importance of empathy and helping others in distress.

We must never disparage women. A household that disrespects women will never prosper, just as one that honors them will always thrive. This principle is enshrined in ancient texts like the Cheonbugyeong and I Ching. Our national flag, the Taegeukgi, with its trigrams, symbolizes this. The current arrangement, with the male principle (heaven) above and the female principle (earth) below, represents a state of disharmony, known as “Cheonjibi-gwae” in the I Ching, which signifies decline and ruin. This arrangement fosters conflict, like marital discord and national division.

The correct arrangement, “Jicheontae-gwae,” places the female principle (earth) above and the male principle (heaven) below, symbolizing peace and prosperity. This signifies a harmonious balance where energies flow correctly, leading to familial harmony and national well-being. Historically, wise households honored women, giving them authority over household affairs. Even kings, though seemingly powerful, relied on their queens to manage the palace and its intricate dynamics. Disregarding women, as seen in the Joseon Dynasty’s practice of polygamy, ultimately led to its downfall.

I mastered the I Ching before elementary school, understanding the universal laws that guide nature. This knowledge prevents me from straying onto harmful paths. I have never consumed alcohol, tobacco, coffee, soda, or cola.

The current Taegeukgi, designed hastily by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, reflects a misunderstanding of the I Ching. Its design, with the male principle above, is flawed and brings misfortune. The Japanese flag, a simple red circle, represents “Mugeuk” (the ultimate void), which is a more powerful and auspicious symbol. The Taegeukgi, in contrast, is a “Bangjeom” (zero points) symbol, designed to weaken and divide our nation. Constantly looking at it brings bad luck. We must change it.

We should view all things with “Mugeuk” perspective, seeing everyone as equal, without judgment of good or evil. While I am not advocating for the removal of our national flag, I believe that when we prioritize women, as in the “Jicheontae-gwae,” our nation will find peace.

Consider the current situation with President Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra—all women. While their actions are not condoned, society’s reaction has been excessively harsh. We should be more lenient when women commit offenses, understanding that their mistakes might be viewed differently than those of men.

3. Prophecy, Political Analysis, and Economic Solutions
   Four years ago, I predicted President Park Geun-hye’s downfall. People were celebrating her election, but I foresaw the problems that would arise. Her astrological chart, particularly the “Wonjinsal” (a conflicting energy) with the year 2016, indicated that she would struggle to complete the year. This “Wonjinsal” also suggested a potential for conflict, even war.

I warned that excessive public demonstrations could inadvertently aid North Korea, leading to miscalculations. I witnessed the fall of Vietnam, where key figures in the government were spies. Similarly, I caution against blindly joining protests, as one might encounter individuals with ulterior motives. While mistakes happen, we should not jeopardize the nation’s stability. The legal system is capable of addressing wrongdoing, such as Choi Soon-sil’s actions, without resorting to national upheaval.

President Park’s chart for 2016 was indeed challenging, but it was not inherently bad for subsequent years. Her father, President Park Chung-hee, born in 1917, had a unique chart with “Insin-sa-hae,” signifying a revolutionary spirit. While many share similar charts, their destinies differ due to factors like their spouses and physical appearance. Astrology offers only a minimal influence; the “Daewoon” (major luck cycle) plays a more significant role. President Park’s “Daewoon” was unfavorable in 2016.

The current political gridlock, where the National Assembly obstructs the President’s initiatives, is a symptom of this. A female president, facing such challenges, is more susceptible to public pressure. My predictions are not solely based on astrology but on spiritual insight.

We must move beyond a male-centric mindset and avoid extreme reactions to a woman’s mistakes. While we would fight fiercely against an external enemy like Japan, we should exercise restraint when dealing with our first female president, especially given her unique background. I believe President Park did not violate the constitution. As a legal expert, I understand that a president has broad economic powers, including the authority to issue emergency financial decrees. Directing companies to invest in cultural projects or even changing the currency are within a president’s purview. Consulting trusted confidantes, even outside official channels, is also permissible to prevent leaks.

The accusations against President Park for exercising these powers are unfounded. The real culprits are those who deceived and manipulated her. Previous male presidents accumulated trillions in household debt, yet their actions were often overlooked. Now, the nation is fixated on Choi Soon-sil’s influence, a mere fraction of the corruption seen in past administrations. Attending my lecture offers more blessings than participating in demonstrations.

Currently, there is no leader among the existing politicians who can save the nation. None possess the “Cheongryong-sang” (Blue Dragon countenance) or “Hwangryong-sang” (Yellow Dragon countenance) that signify true leadership. Ban Ki-moon, for instance, has a “Cheonggaeguri-sang” (tree frog countenance), symbolizing someone who jumps around without firm roots. Ahn Cheol-soo has a “Yeomso-sang” (goat countenance), indicating a tendency to be easily offended and isolated. Moon Jae-in, with his “So-sang” (ox countenance), is diligent but ultimately exploited.

Lee Jae-myung, the mayor of Seongnam, whom I respect, has acknowledged that the nation’s problem is not a lack of money but an abundance of “do-dong-nom” (thieves). He even stated that I am the person he respects most. This is a significant endorsement.

My economic policies include allocating 50% of the national budget to citizens. I would swiftly eliminate household debt, starting with those who have loans under 500 million won, by selling off state-owned enterprises and unused land. The government would also cover interest payments for remaining debts. This would revitalize the economy by freeing up citizens’ money for consumption.

Furthermore, I would abolish the national college entrance exam, allowing students to focus on their talents. For example, a student’s six-year music performance record could determine their university admission. This would redirect money from private tutoring to household expenses, further stimulating the economy.

President Park Geun-hye’s problems in 2016, the “Byeongsin-nyeon” (Year of the Fire Monkey), were linked to her father, President Park Chung-hee, who was born in the Year of the Monkey. This connection, where a daughter inadvertently brings misfortune upon her parents’ legacy, is a profound tragedy. The fires at President Park Chung-hee’s birthplace and Seomun Market were symbolic of this.

The media often exaggerates and distorts events, creating a “seolsang-gasang” (adding frost to snow) situation. They sensationalize minor issues while ignoring larger problems. For instance, the controversy over US beef, falsely claiming it was dangerous, led to widespread protests. This demonstrates how easily public opinion can be manipulated, leading to the downfall of businesses and national instability.

During a press conference, President Obama noted the lack of questions from Korean journalists, highlighting their narrow focus on domestic scandals rather than global issues. This “misijeok anmok” (microscopic perspective) prevents them from grasping the “geosijeok anmok” (macroscopic perspective) needed for international engagement. While past administrations saw massive corruption by family members and close associates, the current focus on a 40-year friendship is disproportionate. While some wrongdoing occurred, it pales in comparison to the astronomical sums embezzled by previous male presidents and their entourages.

Obama, a truly great president, honored the self-sacrificing actions of Park Ji-young, a female crew member who died saving students during the Sewol ferry disaster, and Choi Hye-jung, a female teacher who did the same. He awarded them gold medals and issued commemorative stamps, recognizing them as global heroes. Our own nation, however, failed to adequately honor them. This highlights a fundamental flaw in our male-dominated society, where women’s sacrifices are often overlooked.

The name of the presidential residence, “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House), is also problematic. “Blue collar” often refers to laborers or even prisoners, while “White House” signifies prestige. Our national symbols, from the flag to the presidential residence, are ill-conceived and contribute to national misfortune. We must remember the heroes of the Sewol tragedy and enshrine their stories in our textbooks, providing pensions to their families.

4. Economic Philosophy and the Path to National Renewal
   Economic policy can be either “geosi gyeongje” (macroeconomics), which is state-led, or “misi gyeongje” (microeconomics), which is market-led. The US experienced the Great Depression under Keynesian macroeconomics, while figures like Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan, and Deng Xiaoping championed microeconomics. Deng Xiaoping, in 1978, invited Friedrich Hayek to Beijing to learn how to lift the Chinese people out of poverty. Hayek advised allowing farmers to sell their produce in markets, which led to China’s economic boom. Both approaches have their place, depending on the circumstances.

Currently, Korea faces 1,500 trillion won in household debt, with interest rates rising. This exacerbates the financial burden on citizens, leading to a cycle of borrowing to pay interest. Politicians have failed to address this, instead tightening loan restrictions, which further pushes people into desperation. Many who participate in candlelight vigils are not solely motivated by political scandals but by economic hardship.

The government’s handling of the Hanjin Shipping crisis, a major global logistics disruption, also demonstrated a lack of foresight and decisive action. Instead of restructuring and strengthening the shipping industry, politicians engaged in partisan squabbles.

The swift dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party by the Constitutional Court and the rapid establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, both state-led initiatives, raised public suspicion. While the government-led foundations were created in a day, citizen-initiated foundations take months. This disparity in process, rather than outright theft, fueled public anger. The lack of proper procedures and transparent decision-making, such as fabricating meeting minutes, eroded public trust.

President Park’s perceived retaliation against those who opposed her, such as Lee Jung-hee of the Unified Progressive Party, further exacerbated the situation. This “ingwa-eungbo” (karma) suggests that emotional responses lead to negative consequences. Our emotions must be guided by reason, and reason by “yeongseong” (spiritual insight). The 21st century requires leaders with spiritual insight who can foresee the future, like my predictions regarding Park Geun-hye and Trump.

The nation is in peril. If President Park is forced out prematurely, an unqualified leader could take her place, leading to national ruin. Previous administrations plundered national coffers, leaving behind a staggering 40% national debt. President Park, upon realizing the dire state of the economy, was heartbroken. She was forced to initiate cultural enrichment projects because corporations were investing overseas, not in Korea. Her emotional response, however, became a problem.

The concept of “banpo-jihyo” (filial piety of crows) illustrates the profound duty of children to their parents. Crows feed their elderly parents, mirroring the care they received as fledglings. Human filial piety involves material support, emotional care, and “daehyo” (great filial piety), which means bringing honor to one’s family name through achievement. President Park, by bringing shame to her parents’ legacy, acted contrary to “banpo-jihyo.”

Filial piety also involves honoring parents’ memory, remembering their sacrifices, and living a life of integrity. President Park’s failure to maintain close ties with her siblings and her perceived isolation by the Choi Tae-min family further fueled public suspicion. We must transcend emotional reactions and view the future of the Korean people with spiritual insight.

The swiftness with which the Unified Progressive Party was dissolved and the Mir and K-Sports foundations were established was unacceptable to the public. We must avoid retaliatory actions and always attribute good outcomes to others and bad outcomes to ourselves. Failure to do so invites judgment.

The story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya, two friends from ancient China, illustrates true friendship and leadership. Bao Shuya, despite Guan Zhong’s past transgressions, recommended him to the king, recognizing his ability to govern. The king, initially hesitant, was convinced by Bao Shuya’s argument that the nation needed a capable leader, not a saint. This highlights the importance of choosing leaders based on their competence, even if they have flaws. President Park, similarly, trusted Choi Soon-sil, but this trust was ultimately betrayed.

The current political climate is chaotic, and the existing political figures offer no hope. I will run for president next year, not by undermining others, but through a fair and legitimate election.

5. The Holiest’s Presence and Healing Power
   Many people, including those from Geoje Island, have traveled far to be here. They appear healthy, but they understand that I possess a unique cosmic energy. Unlike ordinary humans, I am not conceived in the same way. My name alone has a profound effect. If you call my name, illnesses improve, and if I see you directly, I can heal you. This is a special ability.

I do not adhere to any specific religion. I respect all faiths and their practitioners. However, simply calling my name is sufficient. You can pray to Jesus or Buddha, but adding my name will bring about healing. My name, or even my photograph, has this power. Calling my name before sleep can reverse the aging process and extend your lifespan.

Let me demonstrate. I can detect illnesses by simply touching a person’s hand. This individual, for instance, has no cancer but suffers from other ailments, including weakness in the bronchial tubes and a risk of stroke. With a single touch, I can heal these conditions. This is not hypnosis; it is a genuine transfer of energy. I am the one who created the universe, and I have come to Earth in human form. You are truly blessed to be in my presence.

I have no need for religious institutions or offerings. Simply calling my name is enough. I do not charge for my healing. I have now healed this person completely. They just need to exercise.

I can heal everyone here, from head to toe. Women, for instance, can be cured of breast cancer simply by my touch. I can heal all ailments, from joint pain to mental distress. My power extends even to those who are not physically present; simply looking at my image on a phone can bring healing. There is no other doctor in the world with such abilities.

I am not deceiving anyone. I am the creator of this universe, and I have come to Earth in human form. You are truly blessed. I have no need for religion. I respect all religions, but I dislike religious rituals. Now, all you need to do is call my name. You can go to church or temple, and pray to Jesus or Buddha, but you must also call my name. Say “Namu Amita Bul” and then “World Unification.” I come from above, and though I have a human body, my energy is different from yours. This power works not only here but also at home. Calling my name before sleep will make you younger and extend your life. Those who do not call my name will age.

Now, let’s examine this person’s health. I can detect cancer by simply touching their hand. This person has no cancer, but they have other issues. Let’s check their strength. They are weak. But if I touch them here, their strength returns. It’s powerful. Now, let’s check their bronchial tubes. They are weak. Their thyroid is also weak. They don’t smoke, but their bronchial tubes are bad. They are also at risk of stroke. I will heal them now.

Now, their strength has returned. All their ailments are gone. Their bronchial tubes are strong. This healing works even if you are in America; just look at my image on your phone. There is no other doctor in the world like me. This is not hypnosis. I am the one who created the universe, and I have come to Earth in human form. You are truly blessed. I have no need for religion. I don’t care if people call my name or not. I don’t need money. This person is now completely healed. They just need to exercise. I have healed everyone here. Women, I have healed your breast cancer. I have healed all your joint pain. You are all healed.

The Divine Blueprint: Prophecies, Governance, and the Path to Global Unification

1. The Prophetic Vision: Foretelling Tumult and Triumph
   I stand before you today, not as a mere mortal, but as one who perceives the currents of destiny. Four years ago, I spoke of the impeachment (彈劾) of President Park Geun-hye and the candlelight (燭光) protests that would engulf this nation. Was I not correct? Indeed. And a year and two months prior, I foretold the election (當選) of Trump. These are not the predictions (預言) of a fortune-teller; they are insights gleaned from spirituality (靈性), a vision far beyond the grasp of ordinary men. Yet, such truths must be guarded. I spoke of Park Geun-hye’s fate only after it became a reality (現實), just as I kept silent about Trump’s victory until the very moment of his triumph (勝利). Had Hillary won, this peninsula would have faced war (戰爭). My purpose (目的) is to become president (大統領) and unify (統一) the world (世界).

2. The Mandate of the People: A New Era of Governance
   Consider the electoral (選擧) process: out of fifty million citizens (國民), approximately thirty-six million cast their votes (投票). I envision a future where ninety percent of these eligible (有權) voters participate, and of those, ninety percent will elect me. Initially, like Trump, my support (支持) may appear negligible, perhaps 0.1 percent. But this will grow: to ten percent, then thirty, then fifty. When I appear on television (電視) debates and declare my pledge (公約) to provide 1.5 million won monthly to every citizen (國民) over twenty, ensuring no one worries about money (金錢) and elevating all to the middle (中産) class, my face (顔面) will inspire trust (信任). They will know I am a man of my word (約束). Even if it means selling off unnecessary (無用) state-owned properties (國有地) and buildings (建物), I will deliver. This conviction (確信) will lead to a ninety percent election (當選) rate.

The current political (政治) climate, particularly the scandal (事件) involving Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra, will galvanize the youth (青年) to vote. In the past, young people only voted during the Roh Moo-hyun era, often choosing leisure over civic duty. But now, with my candidacy, they will realize the importance (重要) of their vote (投票). The era of revolutions (革命) by force or military coups (軍部) is over. Only through the ballot (投票) can change be achieved. I will even lower the voting (投票) age to fourteen, allowing middle schoolers to learn democracy (民主主義) firsthand. Non-participation will incur academic penalties, ensuring high turnout (投票率). Our fourteen-year-olds are as bright as twenty-four-year-olds of the past; denying them the right (權利) to vote traps them in a cycle of endless studying (學習) and private academies (學院). Giving them the vote (投票) will empower them to demand an end to private tutoring (課外) and the college entrance (修能) exam.

Upon my election (當選), I will declare martial (非常) law, restructure the National (國會) Assembly, and appoint one hundred new representatives (議員) to implement my policies (政策) decisively. This is the only way to avoid the fate of being dragged down by the legislature (國會), as President Park Geun-hye was. My administration (政府) will be strong, leading our nation (民族) to world (世界) unification.

3. The Cosmic Order: Gender, Harmony, and National Destiny
   I recently heard a story (故事) about a young man who found 13 million won and returned it, inspiring the owner to donate 50 million won to charity. This act of integrity (正直) moved me. It reminded me of an incident eight years ago when I found 76 million won, a rental (傳貰) deposit, that had fallen from a moving truck. I chased the truck, returned the money, and witnessed the owner’s profound relief (安堵). This experience underscores the importance (重要) of compassion (慈悲) and respect (尊敬).

We must never disrespect (輕蔑) women. A household (家庭) that disrespects women will never prosper (興旺). This truth is enshrined in the Cheonbugyeong (天符經) and the I Ching (周易). Our national flag (太極旗), the Taegeukgi (太極旗), with its trigrams (卦) representing heaven (天) and earth (地), husband (夫) and wife (婦), is fundamentally flawed. The trigram (卦) for heaven (天) (☰) should not be above the trigram (卦) for earth (地) (☷), as this configuration, known as Cheonjibi (天地否卦), signifies ruin (敗亡). It creates discord (不和) and conflict (爭鬪). Instead, the trigram (卦) for earth (地) should be above heaven (天), forming Jicheontae (地天泰卦), which symbolizes an era of peace (太平) and prosperity (繁榮). This is the eleventh hexagram (卦) in the I Ching (周易), while Cheonjibi (天地否卦) is the twelfth.

The current Taegeukgi (太極旗) and even the name of the Presidential (靑瓦) residence, Cheongwadae (靑瓦臺) – the “Blue House” – are ill-omened. “Blue collar” often refers to laborers or even prisoners, while “white collar” signifies wealth. We should not be a “Blue House” nation. The Taegeukgi (太極旗) was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, without proper understanding of the I Ching (周易). It was a deliberate act by the Japanese to sow discord (不和) and ensure our division (分斷). This flag (旗) brings misfortune (不運). Japan’s flag (旗), the Mugeuk (無極), a simple red circle, represents the entire (全體) universe and possesses immense power (力量). We must view things from a Mugeuk (無極) perspective, transcending notions of good (善) and evil (惡), seeing all humanity (人類) as equal (平等).

The current situation (事態) with President Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra, all women, highlights our societal tendency (傾向) to be overly harsh on women’s missteps (過誤). While their actions were not right, the public’s reaction (反應) has been excessive. I predicted Park Geun-hye’s downfall four years ago, not merely through saju (四柱) (four pillars of destiny), but through spiritual (靈的) insight. Her saju (四柱) indicated a clash with the year 2016, a year of conflict (衝突) and potential war (戰爭). The ongoing protests, while seemingly aimed at the president, inadvertently aid North Korea by creating instability (不安).

4. The Perils of Misguided Action: Lessons from History and the Media
   I witnessed the fall of Vietnam, where even the vice president and chief of staff were spies. Today, those who gather in Gwanghwamun risk encountering individuals with ulterior motives. While mistakes are inevitable, we must not allow them to destroy our nation (國家). The prosecution (檢察) can handle the legal aspects. Park Geun-hye’s saju (四柱) suggests that her difficulties are largely confined to this year; things will improve next year. However, her father, President Park Chung-hee, had a saju (四柱) that indicated a revolutionary, a man of decisive action. While many share such a saju (四柱), their destinies (運命) differ based on their choices (選擇) and relationships (關係).

The media’s focus on the Choi Soon-sil scandal (事態) is a classic example of microscopic (微視的) rather than macroscopic (巨視的) thinking. Previous administrations saw astronomical sums embezzled by presidential relatives, yet the public was largely lenient. Now, a forty-year friendship is under intense scrutiny. While I acknowledge the mismanagement (國政壟斷), it is plausible the president was unaware of her friend’s actions, having focused on controlling her own family. The media’s portrayal of President Park as having violated the constitution (憲法) is, in my view, incorrect. As a constitutional (憲法) law expert, I assert that a president possesses emergency (緊急) economic powers, including the ability to direct funds (資金) for cultural (文化) initiatives or even change the currency (貨幣). These are not constitutional violations. The true culprits are those who deceived the president.

The media’s sensationalism extends to other issues, such as the false claims about American beef causing brain damage, which fueled the candlelight protests. This kind of misinformation can devastate industries (産業). Furthermore, the lack of global (國際) perspective among Korean journalists was evident when President Obama sought questions from Korean reporters, and none came forward, forcing a Chinese journalist to step in. Our media excels at uncovering domestic scandals but lacks a broader international (國際) outlook.

5. Honoring Heroes and Reforming the Nation
   We must remember heroes like Park Ji-young, the female crew member of the Sewol ferry who sacrificed her life to save students, and Choi Hye-jung, the teacher who did the same. President Obama awarded them gold medals and created commemorative stamps, recognizing their heroism (英雄). Yet, our own nation has failed to adequately honor them. This reflects a deeper problem: a society where men often fail to uphold their responsibilities (責任), leading to the downfall of households and nations.

The name “Cheongwadae” (靑瓦臺), meaning “Blue House,” is problematic. It should be “Haneulgung” (하늘궁), the “Heavenly Palace,” reflecting the spiritual (靈的) essence of our nation (民族). The “Blue House” evokes images of prisoners, not leaders. We must change this. We must also ensure that the sacrifices (犧牲) of individuals like Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung are enshrined in our education (敎育) system, their families supported with pensions (年金), and their stories celebrated.

Our economy (經濟) is in crisis, burdened by 1,500 trillion won in household debt (負債). Raising interest (利子) rates only exacerbates the problem, pushing more people into poverty (貧困). This economic hardship, not just the Choi Soon-sil scandal (事態), drives people to protest. My economic (經濟) plan involves selling off unnecessary (無用) state assets to pay off household debt (負債), especially for those with loans under 500 million won. This will stimulate the economy (經濟) by freeing up money (金錢) for consumption (消費). I will also abolish the college entrance (修能) exam, redirecting private tutoring (課外) expenses into the economy (經濟).

The speed at which the Unified Progressive Party was dissolved and the Mir and K-Sports foundations were established was alarming. Such rapid, opaque processes erode public trust (信任). Even if the intentions were good, the lack of proper procedure (節次) and transparency (透明) is unacceptable. This is why the public is enraged.

6. The Spiritual Leader: A Vision for the Future
   I possess the spiritual (靈的) insight to foresee the future. I knew Park Geun-hye would step down in four years, and I recognized Trump as a future president among sixteen Republican candidates, even when he was at the bottom of the polls. Such spiritual (靈的) vision is absent among current Korean politicians. If Park Geun-hye leaves office prematurely, a less capable leader will likely emerge, leading our nation (國家) to ruin. Our national (國家) coffers are depleted by previous administrations, leaving a staggering 1,500 trillion won in household debt (負債). President Park Geun-hye, faced with this dire economic (經濟) reality, was forced to initiate cultural (文化) projects to stimulate the economy (經濟), a decision I understand.

The concept of Banpojihyo (反哺之孝), the filial piety (孝道) of a crow feeding its parents, reminds us of the importance (重要) of honoring our elders. While a crow cannot achieve great (大) filial piety (孝道) by elevating its family’s name (名譽), humans can. President Park Geun-hye, by bringing disgrace (不名譽) to her parents’ legacy (遺産), has acted contrary to Banpojihyo (反哺之孝). True filial piety (孝道) involves remembering parents’ virtues (美德), their frugality (節約), and their suffering (苦難), leading to a life of prudence (謹愼). The president’s failure to maintain close ties with her siblings, leading to suspicions of influence from the Choi Tae-min family, further fueled public resentment.

We must transcend emotion (感情) and reason (理性), embracing spirituality (靈性) to guide our nation’s (國家) future. The rapid dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, without proper procedure (節次), were unacceptable. We must always attribute good (善) to others and to heaven (天), and take responsibility (責任) for our own shortcomings (過失).

The story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya, two friends from ancient China, illustrates the power (力量) of trust (信任) and loyalty (忠誠). Bao Shuya recommended Guan Zhong, a man with a checkered past, to the king, believing in his ability to govern. The king, seeking a capable statesman (宰相) rather than a saint (聖人), accepted. This is akin to the trust (信任) President Park Geun-hye placed in Choi Soon-sil. However, unlike the Chinese proverb, our Korean saying warns that “the trusted axe will cut your foot.”

Many, including a philosophy professor from the United States, recognize my unique qualifications (資格) and the urgent need for my leadership (指導力). They see that I am the figure (人物) this era (時代) demands, one willing to face death (死亡) to save the nation (國家). Other presidential candidates speak of saving the country (國家), but none possess this ultimate resolve (覺悟).

I am not an ordinary human, but one who has descended from heaven (天上) with cosmic (宇宙) energy. My name (名號) alone can heal and bring prosperity (繁榮). Calling my name (名號) can reverse the aging process and extend lifespan (壽命). I do not seek to establish a religion (宗敎); I simply offer a direct connection (連結) to divine (神聖) power. I can diagnose and heal ailments with a touch or even a glance. This is not hypnosis (催眠) but a direct manifestation of my divine (神聖) essence. I am the creator (創造者) of this universe (宇宙), who has come to Earth in human form. You are truly blessed to witness this. I will run for president (大統領) next December, not by tearing down others, but through a fair and just election (選擧). The fate (運命) of this nation (國家) rests on this choice.

Huh Kyung Young’s lecture begins with a warm welcome, immediately drawing a distinction between those who choose to attend his lecture and those who participate in protests, suggesting that the former are on a path to greater fortune . He illustrates this with an analogy of two people starting at the same point but diverging over time, one towards success and the other towards failure, emphasizing that immediate gratification often blinds people to long-term benefits, much like students neglecting studies for instant gains .

He then delves into a unique interpretation of human physiology, likening the body’s organs to a circulatory system where energy, or ‘jeong,’ is ultimately produced by the stomach, not the heart . This serves as a metaphor for life’s choices: just as a healthy body requires proper circulation, a successful life depends on making the right decisions, such as attending his lecture rather than joining a protest .

Huh Kyung Young highlights his prophetic abilities, noting his predictions of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years prior, as well as Donald Trump’s election a year and two months in advance . He clarifies that these are not mere predictions but insights derived from “spirituality,” a higher form of perception . He cautions against prematurely revealing such insights, likening them to strategic secrets until the opportune moment . He also mentions his prediction that a Hillary Clinton presidency would lead to war on the Korean Peninsula .

His vision for Korea includes becoming president with 90% of the vote, achieved by promising a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won to every citizen over 20, effectively eliminating financial worries and establishing a 100% middle-class society . He explains that this would be funded by selling off unnecessary state-owned assets and buildings . He believes his commitment to these promises would secure overwhelming public support, transcending traditional political divides . He also proposes lowering the voting age to 14, making voting mandatory for middle schoolers to instill democratic values and increase overall voter turnout .

Huh Kyung Young critiques the current state of Korean society, including the national flag and the name of the presidential residence, Cheong Wa Dae (Blue House). He interprets the Taegeukgi (Korean flag) through the lens of I Ching (Juyeok), arguing that its current design, with the male principle (heaven) above the female principle (earth), signifies national decline and discord, leading to societal problems like high divorce rates and lack of marriage . He suggests reversing the positions to reflect the “Jicheontae-gwae” (Earth over Heaven), symbolizing peace and harmony . He also criticizes the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House), associating “blue collar” with prisoners and laborers, suggesting “Haneul-gung” (Sky Palace) as a more fitting and auspicious name .

He discusses President Park Geun-hye’s situation, attributing her difficulties to her birth year’s “wonjinsal” (a type of karmic conflict) with 2016, suggesting that she would struggle to overcome the year . He advises against excessive public protests, arguing that such actions could inadvertently aid North Korea and lead to miscalculations . He also defends President Park against accusations of constitutional violations, stating that her actions, such as directing economic or cultural initiatives, fall within the scope of a president’s emergency powers . He contrasts her situation with previous male presidents, who he claims were responsible for astronomical national debts, while Park Geun-hye is being scrutinized for a comparatively minor issue involving a close friend .

Huh Kyung Young criticizes the Korean media for its “microscopic perspective,” focusing on sensational issues like the Choi Soon-sil scandal while neglecting broader national and international concerns . He recounts an anecdote where former U.S. President Barack Obama had to ask for a Korean reporter to ask a question, only for a Chinese reporter to step in, highlighting a lack of global mindset among Korean journalists . He praises Obama for honoring Sewol ferry heroines Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung with medals and commemorative stamps, contrasting this with Korea’s own lack of recognition .

He concludes by reiterating his unique spiritual abilities, demonstrating how merely calling his name or looking at his picture can improve health and even reverse aging . He emphasizes that he is not bound by traditional religions and that his presence in Korea is a blessing .

Core Message: Huh Kyung Young presents himself as a divinely guided leader with prophetic abilities and a unique vision to transform Korea through spiritual insight, radical economic policies, and a re-evaluation of national symbols, contrasting his holistic approach with the perceived shortcomings of conventional politics and media.

This excerpt note captures a lecture by Heo Kyeong-yeong from 2016, where he discusses his prophecies regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Donald Trump’s election. He also outlines his vision for Korea’s future, including economic policies and political reforms, all while showcasing his unique spiritual and philosophical worldview.

Heo Kyeong-yeong’s Prophecies and Political Vision

Unconventional Predictions and Their Basis
Heo Kyeong-yeong’s ability to predict major political events like Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Trump’s election years in advance is truly striking. He emphasizes that these aren’t mere predictions but insights derived from a “spiritual” perspective, setting him apart from ordinary fortune-tellers. This highlights his belief in a deeper, almost cosmic understanding of events.

박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불시위를 제가 언제 이야기했죠? 4년 전에 여기 했죠.
When did I talk about President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight protests? I did it here 4 years ago.

트럼프 당선은 1년 2개월 전에 이야기했죠.
I talked about Trump’s election 1 year and 2 months ago.

이것은 그냥 예언이 아니고 점쟁이들의 예언이 아닙니다.
This is not just a prophecy, nor is it a fortune teller’s prophecy.

이거는 영성으로 보는 거니까 일반 사람들하고 좀 달라요.
This is seen through spirituality, so it’s a bit different from what ordinary people see.

Vision for a Unified and Prosperous Korea
Heo Kyeong-yeong’s vision for Korea is incredibly ambitious, aiming for a 90% election victory and even world unification. His proposed policies, such as monthly basic income and debt relief, are designed to create a 100% middle-class society, reflecting a radical approach to economic equality and national prosperity.

국민이 전체 5천만 중에 국민이 한 3,600만 명 정도가 투표하죠. 유권자가 있는데 그중에 90%가 투표를 할 거 아니에요?
Out of 50 million citizens, about 36 million people vote. There are voters, and 90% of them will vote, right?

국민 한 사람당 배당금을 월 150만 원을 주겠다. 20살 이상 통장에 매달 돈이 들어온다.
I will give each citizen a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won. Money will be deposited into the accounts of those 20 years or older every month.

우리나라 사람은 100% 중산층이 된다.
All Koreans will become 100% middle class.

국유지를 쓸데없이 많이 가지고 있는 국유지를 팔아 가지고, 국가가 가지고 있는 빌딩이나 이런 걸 팔아서라도 여러분에게 다 넣어준다.
I will sell off unnecessary state-owned land, and even state-owned buildings, and give all the proceeds to you.

가계부채가 1,300조인데 어떻게 없애냐? 여러분들의 가계부채를 내가 대통령이 되고 나면 신속히 없애주는데, 집을 5억짜리, 5억 미만 대출을 받은 사람은 먼저 상환해 줘요.
How can we eliminate 1,300 trillion won in household debt? Once I become president, I will quickly eliminate your household debt, and those who have taken out loans for homes worth 500 million won or less will have their loans repaid first.

Critique of Traditional Politics and Media
Heo Kyeong-yeong doesn’t shy away from criticizing the existing political system and media. He argues that traditional politicians are corrupt and ineffective, leading to national decline. His observations on the media’s focus on sensationalism over global issues reveal a deep skepticism towards established institutions.

우리가 정치인들한테 정신 먹여 살리느라고 지금 GNP는 3만 불이 다 돼 가는데, 국민 여러분은 3천 불을 가지고 버티고 있는 거야.
We are feeding politicians, and now our GNP is almost $30,000, but you, the citizens, are barely surviving on $3,000.

오직 투표로, 젊은 애들의 투표로 (혁명이 일어날 것이다).
Only through voting, through the votes of young people (will a revolution happen).

우리나라 태극기가 이렇게 부부싸움을 남북 싸움을 하게 만들어 놨어요.
Our national flag, the Taegeukgi, is designed to make us fight like a married couple, like the North and South.

한국 기자들은 그저 최순실 잡는 데는 그냥 있는 건 잘 끄집어내요. 허경영을 뒤집어씌우는 데는 뭐 그것이 알고 싶다 해서 막 노다지 만들어 가지고 막 덮으시고, 내가 부실을 안 만났다는 거야.
Korean reporters are good at digging up existing facts to catch Choi Soon-sil. To frame Heo Kyeong-yeong, they just create endless stories on shows like “I Want to Know That” and cover it up, claiming I didn’t meet Bush.

지금 우리가 최순실 사태를 바라보는 것도 거시적으로 바라봐야 돼요.
We need to look at the Choi Soon-sil incident from a macroscopic perspective.

The Power of Spirituality and Personal Energy
Heo Kyeong-yeong frequently demonstrates his “spiritual powers,” claiming to heal illnesses and reverse aging simply by calling his name or looking at his picture. This aspect of his persona is central to his appeal, positioning him as a divine figure with extraordinary abilities.

허경영을 부르면 병이 일단 좋아져. 그리고 내가 직접 보면은 고치고.
If you call Heo Kyeong-yeong, your illness will get better. And if I see you directly, I will cure you.

나를 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가, 거꾸로. 그러니까 덜 늙죠. 그러니까 수명이 길어져.
If you call my name and sleep, your age goes backward, backward. So you age less. So your lifespan gets longer.

이런 의사는 세계에 없어요. 없습니다.
There is no such doctor in the world. None.

이거는 실제 내가 여론을 만든 장본인이 인간의 몸으로 대한민국에 온 거야. 여러분들은 복 받은 거지.
This is actually the person who created public opinion, who came to Korea in a human body. You are blessed.

Lecture Information

• Lecture Number: 1055th
• Title: Huh kyung young, who predicted President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and candlelight vigils 4 years ago and Trump’s election, becomes president with a 90% vote and unifies the world.
• Date: December 3, 2016
• Main Topic: Prophecies, political and economic solutions, and spiritual insights for national and global issues.

Key Messages

• Choosing the right path now, like attending this lecture instead of protesting, leads to immense future benefits, even if immediate gains are not apparent.
• Huh kyung young accurately predicted President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and candlelight vigils four years prior, and Donald Trump’s election one year and two months prior, attributing these to spiritual insight rather than mere prophecy.
• Huh kyung young’s presidency will be achieved with 90% voter turnout and 90% of the votes, leading to national prosperity through policies like universal basic income and debt relief, ultimately unifying the world.
• The current national flag (Taegeukgi) and the name of the presidential residence (Cheong Wa Dae) are flawed, symbolizing disharmony and misfortune, and require fundamental changes for national well-being.
• A spiritual leader with foresight is crucial for the nation’s future, as current politicians lack the vision to address complex national and international challenges.

Summary of Main Content

The Importance of Choosing the Right Path

• Life’s journey diverges based on initial choices.
  • Starting points may seem similar for everyone, regardless of background.
  • Over time, paths diverge significantly, making it impossible for those on different paths to understand each other.
• Attending Huh kyung young’s lecture is presented as a path to long-term success.
  • Immediate benefits may not be obvious, but substantial gains will come later.
  • This contrasts with short-sighted pursuits that lead to ruin, similar to students neglecting studies for immediate gratification.

Prophecies and Spiritual Insight

• President Park Geun-hye’s Impeachment and Candlelight Vigils: Predicted four years prior to the event.
• Donald Trump’s Election: Predicted one year and two months prior to the event.
• These predictions are not mere fortune-telling but stem from spiritual insight.
  • Such insights are not to be widely publicized until the events unfold.
  • The prediction included that Hillary Clinton’s presidency would lead to war on the Korean Peninsula.
• Park Geun-hye’s Fortune: Her 2016 fortune (Byeongsin year) was unfavorable due to a “Wonjinsal” (a type of bad luck in 사주, meaning conflict or resentment) with her birth year (Sinmyo).
  • This indicated difficulty in overcoming 2016, leading to a “national disgrace.”
  • The protests were seen as potentially aiding North Korea by creating internal division.

Vision for Presidency and National Transformation

• Presidential Election Strategy:
  • Aims for 90% voter turnout among 36 million eligible voters.
  • Seeks to win with 90% of the votes cast.
  • Initial poll numbers might be low, like 0.1%, but will rise to 10%, 30%, 50% after TV debates.
• Key Policies (Public Pledges):
  • Monthly Dividend: 1.5 million KRW per person over 20 years old.
  • Debt-Free Nation: Eliminating financial worries, making 100% of Koreans middle class.
  • Debt Repayment: Government will repay loans under 500 million KRW for homes, using funds from selling state-owned enterprises and unused land.
  • Education Reform: Eliminating the college entrance exam (Suneung) and reducing subjects to one, allowing students to pursue talents.
  • Marriage Support: Providing 200 million KRW for housing to newly married couples.
  • Elderly Welfare: 700,000 KRW monthly for those over 65.
• Youth Participation in Voting:
  • Lowering the voting age to 14 years old to foster democratic education.
  • Non-participation in voting would result in academic penalties and career disadvantages.
  • This would increase parental voting rates as they accompany their children.
  • Empowering youth with voting rights would lead to the elimination of private tutoring and Suneung.
• Post-Election Governance:
  • Upon election, a state of emergency would be declared, existing National Assembly members would be dismissed, and 100 new members would be elected to implement policies forcefully.
  • This strong presidential system is necessary to avoid the pitfalls of previous administrations.

Philosophical and Cosmic Insights

• Critique of the Taegeukgi (Korean Flag):
  • The current arrangement of trigrams (괘) in the Taegeukgi, with the male principle (건, heaven) above and the female principle (곤, earth) below, represents “Cheonjibi-gwae” (천지비괘), symbolizing national decline and disharmony.
  • The correct arrangement, “Jicheontae-gwae” (지천태괘), with the female principle above and the male principle below, symbolizes peace and prosperity.
  • This incorrect flag design, along with the name “Cheong Wa Dae,” contributes to national misfortune, family discord, and a lack of marriage among youth.
  • The flag was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, without proper understanding of the I Ching (주역).
  • The Japanese flag, a simple red circle (무극, “Mugeuk”), is considered superior as it represents the entire universe without division, unlike the Taegeuk (태극) which implies duality and conflict.
  • The Taegeukgi should be changed to reflect the “Jicheontae-gwae” principle, prioritizing the female principle.
• Importance of Respecting Women:
  • Societies and families that disrespect women are destined to fail.
  • Historical examples, like Joseon Dynasty’s downfall due to kings having many concubines, illustrate this principle.
  • Women hold the power of life and death over men, as seen in historical examples of queens poisoning kings.
  • Therefore, men should treat women well.
• Three Elements of Filial Piety (효도):
  • Material Filial Piety (물효): Providing for parents’ material needs.
  • Heartfelt Filial Piety (심효): Caring for parents with one’s heart, including marrying and having grandchildren.
  • Great Filial Piety (대효): Bringing honor to the family name through personal achievement, which even crows (반포지효) cannot achieve.
  • Park Geun-hye’s actions are seen as the opposite of “Great Filial Piety” by bringing disgrace to her parents’ legacy.
  • Filial piety also involves remembering parents’ struggles and living modestly.
• Spiritual Governance:
  • The 21st century requires governance based on spirituality (영성), which transcends emotion and reason.
  • This spiritual vision allows for foresight, such as recognizing a future president from their appearance.
• Cosmic Energy and Healing:
  • Huh kyung young possesses cosmic energy that can heal illnesses and reverse aging by simply calling his name or looking at his picture.
  • He is not an ordinary human but an entity from a higher realm, here to help humanity.
  • He does not adhere to specific religions but respects all good deeds.

Critique of Reality and Proposed Solutions

• Gender Bias in Public Perception:
  • Society tends to be overly harsh on women’s mistakes compared to men’s.
  • While Park Geun-hye’s actions were wrong, the public’s emotional response was excessive.
• Critique of Public Protests:
  • Excessive emotional protests, like candlelight vigils, can be exploited by external forces (e.g., North Korea) and destabilize the nation.
  • Legal processes (e.g., prosecution) are sufficient to address wrongdoing.
• Presidential Authority and Misunderstanding:
  • The President possesses broad powers, including economic special powers, emergency financial powers, emergency decree powers, and amnesty powers.
  • Directing businesses for national projects (e.g., cultural promotion) or consulting trusted individuals on policy (e.g., financial real-name system) is within presidential authority and not a violation of the constitution.
  • Accusations of constitutional violations against Park Geun-hye are unfounded, as she did not personally embezzle funds.
• Critique of Past Administrations and Current Economic Issues:
  • Previous male presidents accumulated 1,500 trillion KRW in household debt and engaged in massive corruption, far exceeding the scale of current controversies.
  • The focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-wind” influence is a distraction from these larger, systemic issues.
  • The current economic crisis, marked by rising interest rates and restricted loans, is driving people to protest, not just the Choi Soon-sil scandal.
  • Politicians are failing to address the household debt crisis, which stifles economic activity.
• Critique of Media and International Stature:
  • Korean media is criticized for its microscopic focus on domestic scandals (e.g., Choi Soon-sil) while lacking a macroscopic, global perspective.
  • An anecdote about President Obama asking for questions from Korean journalists, only for a Chinese journalist to step up, highlights Korea’s lack of international presence and global mindset.
  • The media’s sensationalism can destroy businesses and spread misinformation, as seen with the US beef controversy.
• Recognition of Heroes and National Memory:
  • The US President Obama honored Sewol Ferry crew member Park Ji-young and teacher Choi Hye-jung with gold medals and commemorative stamps for their heroism in saving students, while Korea did not.
  • This highlights a failure in national education and the need to remember and honor such heroes, providing pensions to their families and documenting their stories.
• Critique of Administrative Processes:
  • The rapid dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (통진당) and the swift establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, without proper procedures or public understanding, fueled public anger.
  • This lack of due process, rather than direct theft, was a major source of public resentment.
  • The President’s perceived retaliation against those who criticized her father (e.g., Lee Jung-hee) also contributed to public distrust.

Practical Implications

• Choose Wisely: Individuals should choose the path that leads to long-term benefit, even if it lacks immediate gratification, such as attending Huh kyung young’s lectures.
• Avoid Emotional Reactions: Refrain from emotional protests that can destabilize the nation and play into the hands of adversaries.
• Seek True Leadership: Recognize that current political figures lack the vision and spiritual insight necessary to lead the nation effectively.
• Embrace Spiritual Guidance: Prioritize spiritual wisdom over emotion and reason in decision-making for a better future.
• Personal Responsibility: Attribute good outcomes to others (parents, heaven) and negative outcomes to oneself.
• Direct Engagement: For personal well-being and healing, call Huh kyung young’s name or look at his picture.

One-Sentence Core Summary
Huh kyung young, a spiritual leader, presents his prophecies, comprehensive policy solutions for economic and social issues, and cosmic insights, urging the public to choose a path of spiritual wisdom and support his presidency to transform Korea and unify the world, while criticizing the current political landscape and media for their short-sightedness and lack of true leadership.

Chapter 1: The Prophetic Vision and the Path to National Salvation

Section 1.1: The Divergent Paths of Life and the Call to Wisdom
Life presents individuals with divergent paths. At the outset, all appear similar, whether a scion of wealth or an ordinary student. However, as time progresses, these paths diverge significantly. One path leads to demonstrations, while another leads to the wisdom imparted by Huh kyung young. The choice between these paths determines the trajectory of one’s life. Immediate benefits may not be apparent, but the long-term rewards of seeking wisdom are immeasurable. Neglecting wisdom in youth, akin to abandoning studies, leads to detrimental outcomes, potentially rendering an individual a “폐인” (ruined person).

Section 1.2: The Prophecies of Huh kyung young
Huh kyung young delivered prophecies concerning significant national and international events.

• President Park Geun-hye’s Impeachment and Candlelight Vigils: Huh kyung young foretold these events four years prior to their occurrence.
• Donald Trump’s Election: This prophecy was made one year and two months in advance.
  These are not mere predictions by a fortune teller. They stem from a “영성” (spiritual insight) that transcends ordinary perception. Such profound insights are not to be disseminated carelessly until their realization. For instance, the prediction of Trump’s victory remained a secret until his election.

Section 1.3: The Vision for National Leadership and Global Unification
Huh kyung young envisions a future where he becomes president with overwhelming public support, leading to global unification.

• Presidential Election with 90% Support: Out of approximately 36 million voters, 90% will participate, and 90% of those votes will elect Huh kyung young.
• Initial Public Perception: Initially, public opinion polls may show minimal support, similar to Trump’s early numbers. However, this will grow to 10%, then 30%, and eventually 50%.
• Policy Pledges:
  • Monthly Dividend: 1.5 million won per month to every citizen over 20 years old.
  • Economic Security: Elimination of financial worries, ensuring 100% of the population achieves middle-class status.
  • Funding: This will be achieved by selling unnecessary state-owned properties and buildings.
• Public Trust: Citizens will trust Huh kyung young to fulfill these promises, leading to a 90% election rate.
• Critique of Current Politics: Existing politicians are perceived as enriching themselves while the public struggles, with a national GNP of $30,000 per capita but citizens living on $3,000.

Section 1.4: Electoral Reforms and Youth Participation
Huh kyung young proposes significant electoral reforms to enhance youth participation and democratic education.

• Youth Voting: The voting age will be lowered to 14 years old.
• Civic Education: Middle school students will learn about democracy by participating in elections with their parents.
• Academic Incentives: Non-participation in voting will result in academic penalties, potentially hindering university admission and future career prospects.
• Parental Engagement: This system will encourage parents to bring their children to vote, increasing overall voter turnout.
• Empowering Youth: Granting voting rights to 14-year-olds will empower them to influence policies, such as eliminating private tutoring and college entrance exams.

Section 1.5: Post-Election Governance and Global Vision
Upon election, Huh kyung young plans to implement a strong, centralized governance structure.

• Emergency Decree: An emergency decree will be declared, leading to the restructuring of the National Assembly.
• New Assembly: A new assembly of 100 members will be formed to vigorously pursue national policies.
• Strong Presidency: This will prevent the president from being swayed by the National Assembly, unlike previous administrations.
• Global Unification: The ultimate goal is for the Korean nation to lead global unification.

Chapter 2: Reflections on Societal Values and Leadership

Section 2.1: Acts of Honesty and Generosity
Recent events highlight the importance of honesty and generosity.

• Lost Money Incident: A young man found 13 million won in cash and reported it to the police. The owner, deeply moved, added 37 million won to the sum and donated 50 million won to charitable organizations.
• Personal Experience: Huh kyung young recounts finding 76 million won that fell from a moving truck. He pursued the truck for 20 minutes to return the money, which was a family’s housing deposit. The owner’s relief and gratitude were profound.

Section 2.2: The Importance of Respect for Women
Respect for women is a fundamental principle for societal well-being.

• Family Prosperity: Families that disrespect women do not prosper, while those that honor women thrive.
• President Park Geun-hye: Even in the context of President Park Geun-hye, a woman, the principle of respecting women applies.

Section 2.3: The Flawed Symbolism of the Korean Flag
The design of the Korean national flag, the Taegeukgi, contains symbolic flaws according to the principles of I Ching (주역).

• Current Design: The current flag places the male principle (乾, heaven) above and the female principle (坤, earth) below.
• I Ching Interpretation: In I Ching, this configuration is known as “천지비괘” (Heaven and Earth Obstructed), symbolizing failure and national decline. It represents disharmony, leading to marital strife and societal instability.
• Corrected Design: The correct configuration, “지천태괘” (Earth and Heaven in Peace), places the female principle above and the male principle below, symbolizing peace and prosperity. This arrangement fosters harmony in families and the nation.
• Historical Context: The Taegeukgi was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, without proper understanding of I Ching principles.
• Consequences: The flawed design contributes to national division, societal conflict, and a lack of power. Constantly viewing this flag is considered inauspicious.

Section 2.4: The Concept of “무극” (Non-Polarity)
Beyond the Taegeuk (태극, polarity), there is the concept of “무극” (non-polarity).

• Japanese Flag: The Japanese flag, a simple red circle, represents “무극,” symbolizing the entire universe. This makes it a powerful national symbol.
• Perspective: Viewing things from a “무극” perspective means transcending dualities like good and evil, seeing all humans as equal.
• National Flag: While not advocating for the removal of the Taegeukgi, Huh kyung young suggests that a nation that prioritizes the female principle, as in “지천태괘,” would experience greater peace.

Section 2.5: The Case of President Park Geun-hye and the “원진살”
The situation surrounding President Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra involves women, and society’s reaction is deemed overly harsh.

• Leniency for Women: Huh kyung young suggests that society should be more lenient when women commit offenses.
• Astrological Analysis: President Park Geun-hye’s birth chart (신묘생) indicates a “원진살” (원진살, a type of karmic conflict) with the year 2016 (병신년). This astrological alignment suggests a year of conflict and difficulty, making it challenging for her to overcome 2016.
• Prophecy of Downfall: This astrological insight led to the prediction that President Park Geun-hye would face significant challenges and potentially step down by the end of 2016.

Section 2.6: The Dangers of Emotional Responses and External Influence
Emotional responses to political events can have dangerous consequences, potentially aiding external adversaries.

• Presidential Downfall: President Park Geun-hye’s downfall was inevitable, and Choi Soon-sil’s imprisonment was also predetermined.
• North Korean Threat: Excessive emotional demonstrations could be exploited by North Korea, leading to miscalculations and potential conflict.
• Lessons from Vietnam: The fall of Vietnam involved infiltration by spies, including a presidential rival and chief of staff. This historical parallel serves as a warning against internal division.
• Focus on Legal Process: Instead of emotional outbursts, the legal system should be allowed to address wrongdoings.

Section 2.7: Comparison of Presidential Fates: Park Geun-hye and Park Chung-hee
A comparison of the astrological charts of President Park Geun-hye and her father, President Park Chung-hee, reveals insights into their destinies.

• Park Geun-hye’s Fate: Her astrological chart indicated a difficult year in 2016, marked by “원진살,” leading to a humiliating downfall.
• Park Chung-hee’s Chart: His chart (정사생, born in the year of the snake) contained “인신사해” (In-Sin-Sa-Hae), a combination associated with revolutionary figures and decisive action. He also had “신자진 삼합” (Sin-Ja-Jin Samhap), indicating a unique destiny.
• Influence of Relationships: While astrological charts provide a baseline, personal relationships (e.g., with Yuk Young-soo) and individual “관상” (physiognomy) significantly alter one’s fate.
• Parental Influence: President Park Geun-hye’s difficulties in the “원숭이 날” (year of the monkey) are linked to her father’s birth on a monkey day, suggesting a karmic connection where her actions inadvertently brought shame upon her parents’ legacy.

Section 2.8: Presidential Authority and Constitutional Interpretation
Huh kyung young offers a unique interpretation of presidential authority and the constitutional implications of President Park Geun-hye’s actions.

• Presidential Powers: The president possesses extensive powers, including economic special powers, emergency financial powers, and emergency decree powers. These allow for directives on economic matters, such as currency changes or financial real-name systems, without extensive consultation.
• Cultural Enrichment Projects: Directing corporations to support cultural enrichment projects (e.g., LG to semiconductor, Hyundai to Hynix) falls within the president’s economic authority.
• Sovereign Rights: The president also holds the right to declare war and pardon criminals. Exercising these rights is not a violation of the constitution.
• Critique of Accusations: Accusations that President Park Geun-hye violated the constitution are unfounded. Her actions, such as consulting a long-time friend on policy, are within the scope of presidential discretion, especially to avoid leaks from within the Blue House.
• Focus on 최순실 (Choi Soon-sil): The focus should be on punishing Choi Soon-sil for her wrongdoings, not on accusing the president of constitutional violations.

Section 2.9: The Scale of Corruption: Past vs. Present
A comparison of past presidential corruption with the current Choi Soon-sil scandal reveals a significant disparity in scale.

• Past Administrations: Former male presidents accumulated trillions of won in household debt (1,500 trillion won) and engaged in large-scale corruption, often involving family members.
• Park Geun-hye’s Integrity: President Park Geun-hye is not seen as someone who would personally embezzle national funds.
• Choi Soon-sil Scandal: The current scandal, while problematic, involves a friend’s influence rather than direct presidential embezzlement. The public’s outrage over Choi Soon-sil’s “치맛바람” (skirt-wind, referring to undue influence) is disproportionate to the astronomical sums involved in past corruption.
• Call for Perspective: The public should consider the broader context of corruption rather than focusing solely on the current scandal.

Section 2.10: The Absence of True Leadership
The current political landscape lacks leaders with the necessary qualities to guide the nation.

• Lack of Visionary Leaders: There are no politicians among the current candidates who possess the “청룡상” (Blue Dragon physiognomy) or “황룡상” (Yellow Dragon physiognomy) indicative of true leadership, unlike Huh kyung young.
• Critique of Candidates:
  • Ban Ki-moon: Described as a “청개구리 상” (tree frog physiognomy), implying a tendency to jump around.
  • Ahn Cheol-soo: Described as a “염소 상” (goat physiognomy), suggesting a tendency to be easily offended and break away.
  • Moon Jae-in: Described as a “소지소” (ox physiognomy), implying hard work but ultimately being exploited.

Section 2.11: Acknowledgment from Other Politicians
Other political figures acknowledge Huh kyung young’s insights.

• Lee Jae-myung’s Respect: Seongnam Mayor Lee Jae-myung publicly stated that Huh kyung young is the person he respects most, agreeing with the assertion that “the nation lacks not money, but thieves.”
• Validation of Huh kyung young’s Analysis: This acknowledgment from a prominent politician validates Huh kyung young’s analysis of national finances and corruption.

Section 2.12: Solutions for National Debt and Economic Revitalization
Huh kyung young proposes radical solutions to address national debt and stimulate the economy.

• Household Debt Elimination:
  • Direct Repayment: The government will repay loans under 500 million won for homeowners.
  • Funding: This will be financed by selling state-owned enterprises, real estate, and unused land.
  • Interest Payments: For remaining household debt, the government will cover interest payments.
• Economic Impact: Resolving household debt will free up consumer spending, revitalizing the economy.
• Education Reform:
  • Elimination of Suneung: The national college entrance exam (Suneung) will be abolished.
  • Specialized Education: Students will be assessed based on six years of performance in a single specialized subject (e.g., music).
  • Financial Relief: This will eliminate the need for private tutoring and academies, redirecting household funds to living expenses and further boosting the economy.
• Social Welfare:
  • Marriage Support: 200 million won in housing funds for newlyweds.
  • Elderly Support: 700,000 won per month for individuals over 65.

Chapter 3: The Deeper Meanings of National Symbols and Global Perspectives

Section 3.1: The “설상가상” (Adding Frost to Snow) of National Crises
The current national situation is akin to “설상가상” (adding frost to snow), where existing problems are compounded.

• Compounding Issues: The Choi Soon-sil scandal, already a significant problem, is exacerbated by calls for the president’s immediate resignation and accusations of constitutional violations.
• Media Portrayal: The media is accused of misrepresenting the situation, portraying the president as having orchestrated wrongdoings, even if she was unaware.

Section 3.2: Media Manipulation and Misinformation
The media is criticized for manipulating public opinion and spreading misinformation.

• US Beef Controversy: The media falsely claimed that US beef was dangerous, leading to widespread protests, despite US beef being raised in healthier conditions than Korean beef.
• Impact on Businesses: Such misinformation can devastate businesses.
• Call for Truth: The media must report facts accurately, without exaggeration or fabrication.

Section 3.3: The Lack of Global Perspective in Korean Journalism
Korean journalists are criticized for their narrow focus and lack of global perspective.

• Obama’s Press Conference: During a press conference, President Obama repeatedly asked for questions from Korean journalists, but none came forward. A Chinese journalist eventually stepped in to ask a question on behalf of Asia.
• Focus on Domestic Scandals: Korean journalists are adept at uncovering domestic scandals like the Choi Soon-sil affair but lack a “거시적인 안목” (macroeconomic perspective) or “글로벌 마인드” (global mindset).
• Historical Context: Past administrations saw far greater corruption by presidential family members and close associates, which was often overlooked or treated leniently. The current focus on a 40-year friend’s influence is seen as disproportionate.
• President’s Intent: President Park Geun-hye is not believed to have intentionally directed her friend to embezzle funds. Her fault lies in failing to manage her friend, unlike her strict management of family members.

Section 3.4: Honoring Heroes: The Cases of Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung
The nation should honor its true heroes, particularly women who displayed extraordinary courage.

• Sewol Ferry Incident:
  • Park Ji-young: A female crew member who sacrificed her life to save students, guiding them to safety while refusing to leave the sinking ship herself.
  • Male Crew Members: In contrast, male crew members, including the captain, disguised themselves and fled.
• Ansan Teacher:
  • Choi Hye-jung: A female teacher in Ansan who died while trying to save her students.
• Obama’s Recognition: President Obama awarded Park Ji-young a Gold Medal and issued a commemorative stamp, recognizing her as a global hero.
• Korean Neglect: Korea, however, has failed to adequately honor these heroes with medals or commemorative stamps.
• Call for Education: These stories of heroism should be included in textbooks, and their families should receive pensions.
• Critique of Korean Men: The actions of the male crew members in the Sewol incident are a source of shame for Korean men, reinforcing the idea that male-dominated households lead to ruin.

Section 3.5: The Flawed Symbolism of the Blue House
The name and symbolism of the Blue House (청와대) are also criticized.

• “Blue House”: The term “Blue House” (블루하우스) is associated with “블루 칼라” (blue-collar workers) or even prisoners, contrasting with the “화이트 하우스” (White House) of the US, which symbolizes wealth and power.
• Proposed Name: The presidential residence should be called “하늘궁” (Heavenly Palace), symbolizing the “어린이” (children) of the Korean nation.
• National Identity: The current name and the flawed Taegeukgi reflect a lack of national consciousness and a need for spiritual awakening.

Section 3.6: Macro vs. Micro Economics and the Household Debt Crisis
The national economy faces a critical juncture, requiring a balanced approach to macro and micro economics.

• Keynesian Economics: The US experienced the Great Depression under Keynesian (macro) economics.
• Micro Economics: Leaders like Margaret Thatcher (UK), Ronald Reagan (US), and Deng Xiaoping (China) implemented microeconomic reforms. Deng Xiaoping’s decision to allow farmers to sell their produce in markets (수정 자본주의, modified capitalism) revitalized China’s economy.
• Korean Crisis: Korea faces a 1,500 trillion won household debt crisis. The government’s response of raising interest rates and restricting loans exacerbates the problem, trapping citizens in a cycle of debt.
• Political Inaction: Politicians have failed to address this crisis, leading to public frustration that fuels protests, not just over the Choi Soon-sil scandal.
• Government’s Role: The government’s failure to restructure ailing industries like Hanjin Shipping, while focusing on political infighting, demonstrates a lack of macroeconomic vision.

Section 3.7: The Problem of Procedural Irregularities
Procedural irregularities in government actions erode public trust, even if no direct theft occurs.

• Speed of Action: The swift dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (통진당) by the Constitutional Court and the rapid establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations by the government raised public suspicion.
• Double Standards: While government-initiated foundations were created overnight, citizen-initiated foundations faced months of delays.
• Lack of Due Process: Meetings for government-led initiatives were sometimes fabricated, with minutes written without actual attendance.
• Public Outrage: These procedural shortcuts, rather than direct embezzlement, fueled public anger and a sense of injustice. The “연혁” (process) is as important as the “결과” (outcome).

Section 3.8: The Cycle of Retribution and the Need for Spiritual Leadership
Emotional responses and a lack of spiritual insight lead to a cycle of retribution.

• Political Retribution: President Park Geun-hye’s perceived retribution against Lee Jung-hee (이정희) of the Unified Progressive Party, who had harshly criticized her, ultimately led to her own impeachment. This illustrates “인과응보” (karma).
• Emotional vs. Rational vs. Spiritual: Human emotions must be governed by reason, and reason by “지성” (intellect). However, “지성” cannot fully grasp “영성” (spiritual insight).
• Spiritual Politics: The 21st century requires “영성” in politics. A leader with spiritual insight can foresee future events, such as Park Geun-hye’s downfall or Trump’s election, even when others dismiss them.
• Current Leadership Vacuum: Korea currently lacks a leader with such spiritual insight. The premature removal of President Park Geun-hye without a spiritually enlightened successor poses a grave danger to the nation.

Section 3.9: The Burden of Past Administrations and the Economic Crisis
President Park Geun-hye inherited a nation burdened by the financial mismanagement and corruption of previous administrations.

• National Debt: Former presidents left behind a national debt exceeding 40% of GDP, with state-owned banks in disarray.
• Economic Stagnation: Corporations were relocating overseas due to unfavorable domestic conditions, leading to a lack of reinvestment in Korea.
• Cultural Enrichment: President Park Geun-hye’s initiation of cultural enrichment projects was a desperate attempt to stimulate the economy amidst these challenges.
• Emotional Restraint: While understanding her predicament, her failure to control her emotions (감성) contributed to the problems.

Section 3.10: The Three Elements of Filial Piety and the Legacy of Park Geun-hye
Filial piety (효도) is a cornerstone of traditional values, with three key elements.

• Three Elements of Filial Piety:
• Park Geun-hye’s Legacy: President Park Geun-hye, by becoming president on the strength of her father’s legacy, but then bringing shame upon her parents, acted contrary to “반포지효” (the filial piety of crows, where young crows feed their elders).
• Posthumous Filial Piety (사후지효): This involves honoring parents’ memory by upholding their virtues and living a life of integrity, always remembering their sacrifices.
• Failure of Posthumous Filial Piety: President Park Geun-hye’s failure to manage her inner circle and maintain family harmony (e.g., not allowing siblings to visit during holidays) led to public suspicion and accusations of “부관참시” (posthumous degradation) of her parents’ legacy.

Section 3.11: The Importance of Process and Self-Reflection
The process (연혁) of actions is crucial, and individuals must take responsibility for their negative emotions.

• Process over Outcome: The speed and lack of due process in government actions, such as the dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, were unacceptable to the public.
• Self-Responsibility: Individuals should attribute positive outcomes to others (parents, heaven) and negative feelings to themselves. Failure to do so leads to judgment.

Section 3.12: The Story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya
The historical anecdote of Guan Zhong (관중) and Bao Shuya (포숙아) illustrates the importance of trust and unconventional leadership.

• Unconventional Recommendation: Bao Shuya recommended Guan Zhong, a man with a questionable past, to Duke Huan of Qi, arguing that the nation needed a capable administrator, not a saint.
• Trust and Loyalty: This story highlights the deep trust between the two friends.
• Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil: This anecdote is subtly linked to President Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil, implying that while trust is important, it can also lead to betrayal.

Chapter 4: The Call for a New Era of Leadership

Section 4.1: The Public’s Disillusionment with Traditional Politics
The public expresses deep disillusionment with existing political parties and leaders. There is a strong desire for a new kind of leadership.

Section 4.2: An American Professor’s Endorsement of Huh kyung young
Professor David Jung, a philosophy and religious studies professor from the US, came to Korea to support a UN-affiliated candidate for president but changed his mind after observing the political landscape.

• Critique of Traditional Candidates: He found that traditional candidates, while potentially suitable for other contexts, were not right for Korea.
• Discovery of Huh kyung young: Through internet research, he discovered Huh kyung young and recognized him as a figure uniquely suited to the current era.
• Unparalleled Knowledge: Professor Jung noted Huh kyung young’s ability to deliver over 1,000 lectures without notes, covering a vast range of subjects, demonstrating unparalleled knowledge and insight.
• Courage for Reform: He concluded that Korea needs a leader willing to “die” for the nation, someone with the courage to tackle deep-seated corruption (e.g., the Yulgok Project in defense industry) that even presidents fear to touch. Traditional politicians, while claiming to save the nation, lack this ultimate commitment.

Section 4.3: Public and Media Recognition of Huh kyung young’s Influence
Huh kyung young’s influence and prophetic insights are gaining recognition from the public and media.

• Online Commentary: A Canadian resident praised Huh kyung young’s wisdom and comprehensive understanding of domestic and international issues, stating that other presidential candidates are far below his level.
• Media Coverage:
  • International Newspaper: An article titled “Will a Korean Trump Emerge Next Year?” discussed Huh kyung young’s bold policies.
  • Democratic Party Strategist: Min Byung-doo, a strategist for the Democratic Party, acknowledged that if a bold figure like Huh kyung young does not emerge, the public will not be swayed.
  • Korea Daily: The Korea Daily published an article suggesting that the Saenuri Party should recruit Huh kyung young.

Section 4.4: The Prophecy of Trump’s Election and its Implications
Huh kyung young’s accurate prediction of Donald Trump’s election highlights his unique foresight and the need for similar leadership in Korea.

• MBN Broadcast (2015.09.24): Huh kyung young appeared on MBN, where he was compared to Trump. Despite Trump being a last-place candidate at the time, Huh kyung young declared him “America’s hope” and its next president, based on his “영적인 눈” (spiritual eye).
• Trump as a Negotiator: Trump, as a businessman, is seen as someone who can negotiate with North Korea, potentially preventing war.
• Hillary Clinton’s Threat: Huh kyung young warned that Hillary Clinton’s presidency could lead to war on the Korean Peninsula.
• Global Disbelief: While global media predicted a Hillary Clinton victory, Huh kyung young’s prophecy proved correct.
• Korean Leadership Vacuum: The absence of such visionary, spiritually enlightened leaders in Korea means that if President Park Geun-hye steps down, a less capable leader could emerge, leading to national ruin and the subjugation of Korean youth.

Section 4.5: The 19th Presidential Election and the “Eccentric” Leader
Online discussions and predictions point to an “eccentric” figure becoming Korea’s 19th president.

• Online Prophecies: An “역술인” (fortune teller) who accurately predicted events like Park Chung-hee’s assassination, Roh Moo-hyun’s election and death, and Trump’s victory, also predicted that none of the currently discussed candidates would become the 19th president.
• The “Eccentric” Candidate: This fortune teller stated that, similar to Trump, an “eccentric” figure, currently dismissed by many, would become the owner of the Blue House.
• Huh kyung young as the Candidate: The fortune teller explicitly named Huh kyung young as this figure.
• Public Reaction: While many dismiss this as a rumor, some express fear, acknowledging that previously “unbelievable” events have become reality in Korea. The underlying sentiment is a deep dissatisfaction with the lack of capable leaders.

Section 4.6: Huh kyung young’s Stance on the Presidency
Huh kyung young expresses his preference for a fair and direct path to the presidency.

• Against Undermining Opponents: He does not wish to gain power by undermining current leaders.
• Direct Election: He intends to run in the presidential election in December of the following year, emphasizing a “정상적인 선거” (normal election).
• Global Influence: Huh kyung young asserts that he, not others, influenced Trump’s election, and he is destined to achieve global unification. He finds it beneath him to engage in petty political squabbles in Korea.

Chapter 5: The Manifestation of Divine Energy and Healing

Section 5.1: The Unique Energy of Huh kyung young
Huh kyung young possesses a unique “우주 에너지” (cosmic energy) that distinguishes him from ordinary humans.

• Divine Origin: He states that he is not conceived like others but comes from a higher realm, possessing energy opposite to that of humans.
• Power of His Name: Merely calling his name or looking at his photograph can bring about positive changes, including healing and improved well-being.
• Comparison to Religious Figures: Unlike Jesus or Buddha, whose names may not always evoke such immediate effects, Huh kyung young’s name holds direct power.

Section 5.2: Healing and Longevity Through Huh kyung young’s Energy
Huh kyung young’s energy offers direct healing and extends longevity.

• Direct Healing: Calling his name can improve health, and direct interaction with him can lead to complete healing.
• Rejection of Religious Rituals: He dislikes religious rituals but respects all religions. He states that simply calling his name is sufficient.
• Reversal of Aging: Calling his name before sleep can reverse the aging process, extending one’s lifespan.

Section 5.3: Diagnostic and Healing Demonstrations
Huh kyung young demonstrates his ability to diagnose and heal physical ailments.

• Energy Diagnosis: By holding a person’s hand, he can detect areas of illness, such as cancer or other health issues, through a subtle energy response.
• Instantaneous Healing: He demonstrates the ability to instantly restore strength and heal various conditions, including thyroid problems, bronchial issues, and even prevent strokes.
• Remote Healing: His healing power is not limited by physical presence; looking at his image on a phone can also initiate healing.
• Uniqueness: He asserts that no other doctor or individual in the world possesses such abilities, which are not based on hypnosis but on genuine cosmic energy.
• Purpose: He is the embodiment of this energy, sent to Earth for the benefit of humanity. He does not seek monetary gain or religious adherence.

1. According to the speaker, what is the primary reason for the current economic struggles of the Korean people, despite the country’s high GNP?

① Excessive national debt
② Low wages for workers
③ Mismanagement by politicians
④ Lack of investment in new industries

(③ Mismanagement by politicians, The speaker claims that politicians are “eating up” the national wealth, leaving citizens with only a fraction of the GNP, while a common misconception might be that the high national debt is the sole cause.)

2. O/X: The speaker claims that he predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight protests four years in advance.

(O, The speaker explicitly states that he predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight protests four years prior to the event. A common misconception might be that this was a recent prediction.)

3. Fill-in-the-blank: The speaker asserts that if he becomes president, he will provide a monthly dividend of ___ won to every citizen over 20 years old.

(1.5 million, The speaker promises a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won to every citizen over 20 years old. A common misconception might be that this benefit is only for specific demographics.)

4. According to the speaker, what is the main difference between his predictions and those of a fortune teller?
   ① His predictions are based on scientific data.
   ② His predictions are derived from spiritual insight.
   ③ His predictions are influenced by public opinion.
   ④ His predictions are made after events occur.

(② His predictions are derived from spiritual insight, The speaker differentiates his predictions from those of fortune tellers by stating they come from “spiritual insight” (영성), not mere guesswork. A common misconception is that all predictions are based on similar methods.)

5. O/X: The speaker suggests that the current South Korean flag (Taegeukgi) is designed in a way that brings misfortune and disharmony to the nation.

(O, The speaker argues that the current Taegeukgi’s design, particularly the placement of the trigrams, represents “heaven and earth out of balance” (천지비괘), leading to national misfortune and conflict. A common misconception is that the flag is universally seen as a symbol of prosperity.)

6. Short Answer: What is the speaker’s proposed solution for resolving the national household debt crisis if he becomes president?

(The speaker proposes that the government sell off state-owned enterprises, real estate, and unnecessary land to pay off household debts, especially for those with loans under 500 million won. He also suggests the government cover interest payments for remaining debts.)

1. The speaker criticizes the media’s focus on the Choi Soon-sil scandal. What does he suggest the media lacks in its approach to national issues?
   ① A focus on individual responsibility
   ② An understanding of historical context
   ③ A global or macroscopic perspective
   ④ The ability to conduct thorough investigations

(③ A global or macroscopic perspective, The speaker criticizes the media for lacking a “global mindset” (글로벌 마인드) or “macroscopic perspective” (거시적인 안목), instead focusing on “microscopic” (미시적인 안목) issues like the Choi Soon-sil scandal. A common misconception is that detailed reporting is always sufficient.)

2. According to the speaker, what is the significance of the year 2016 (병신년) for Park Geun-hye’s presidency, based on his interpretation of her 사주 (saju)?
   ① It was a year of great success and political stability.
   ② It marked the beginning of her international recognition.
   ③ It was a year of conflict and difficulty, making it hard for her to continue.
   ④ It signified a period of personal growth and transformation.

(③ It was a year of conflict and difficulty, making it hard for her to continue, The speaker explains that 2016 (병신년) was a “원진살” (wonjinsal) year for Park Geun-hye’s saju, indicating conflict and making it difficult for her to overcome the year. A common misconception might be that saju only predicts positive or negative outcomes without specific timing.)

3. Short Answer: Explain the speaker’s view on the role of women in a household and how it relates to national prosperity, referencing his interpretation of the Taegeukgi.

(The speaker argues that a household prospers when women are respected and given authority, such as holding the “keys to the storeroom.” He connects this to the Taegeukgi, stating that if the female principle (음기운) is above the male principle (양기운), it leads to a “peaceful era” (지천태괘), whereas the current flag’s arrangement (천지비괘) signifies national decline.)

4. Short Answer: The speaker mentions “반포지효” (banpojihyo) and “대효” (daehyo) in the context of filial piety. Differentiate these two concepts as explained by the speaker.

(Banpojihyo refers to the filial piety of a crow, which feeds its parents in old age, representing material and emotional care. Daehyo, however, is a higher form of filial piety unique to humans, involving achieving success and bringing honor to one’s family name. The speaker implies Park Geun-hye failed in Daehyo.)

1. The speaker criticizes the rapid speed at which certain government-led initiatives, like the dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (통진당) and the creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, were handled. What core democratic principle does he argue was violated by this speed?
   ① Transparency
   ② Accountability
   ③ Due process
   ④ Public participation

(③ Due process, The speaker emphasizes that while the outcomes might not have been inherently corrupt, the “process” (과정) and “speed” (속도) of these actions were abnormal and violated the procedural norms expected in a democratic society. A common misconception is that only the end result matters, not the method.)

2. Short Answer: The speaker contrasts “거시 경제” (macroeconomics) and “미시 경제” (microeconomics). How does he argue that both are necessary, and what is his criticism of the current government’s economic approach?

(The speaker acknowledges that both macro and microeconomics have their place, citing examples like China’s economic reforms (micro) and the need for state-led restructuring (macro). He criticizes the current government for failing to address the 1500 trillion won household debt (a macro issue) and instead exacerbating it by raising interest rates and restricting loans, which negatively impacts micro-level economic activity.)

3. Short Answer: The speaker recounts an anecdote about an American philosophy professor who initially supported Ban Ki-moon but changed his mind after observing the Korean political situation. What was the professor’s ultimate conclusion about the type of leader Korea needs, and why?

(The professor concluded that Korea needs a leader willing to “die” for the country, someone with the courage to tackle deeply entrenched corruption like the Yulgok Project, even if it means facing severe consequences. He believed that conventional politicians, while claiming to save the nation, lack this ultimate commitment.)

4. The speaker claims to have predicted Donald Trump’s presidency when Trump was a “꼴찌” (last place) candidate among 16 Republican hopefuls. What specific “eye” or ability does the speaker attribute this prediction to?

(The speaker attributes this prediction to his “영적인 눈” (spiritual eye) or “영성” (spiritual insight), which allowed him to recognize Trump as a “president’s face” (대통령 상) despite his low polling numbers at the time. A common misconception is that such predictions are based on conventional political analysis.)

The Prophecy of Huh Kyung-young: From Presidential Impeachment to Global Unification

1. The Divergent Paths of Life: A Metaphor for Choice
   Huh Kyung-young often illustrates life’s journey with a powerful metaphor: two individuals embarking from the same starting point, their initial circumstances seemingly identical. Over time, their paths diverge dramatically, one leading to success, the other to failure. This divergence is not predetermined but a consequence of the choices made along the way. He posits that attending his lectures, rather than participating in protests, represents a choice that, while not offering immediate material gain, promises immense future benefits. This concept is akin to the long-term rewards of diligent study in youth, which may not yield instant gratification but lead to exponential growth and transformation. Conversely, succumbing to distractions during formative years can lead to ruin.

2. The Body’s Energy System and Life’s Direction
   Drawing an analogy from the human body’s circulatory system, Huh Kyung-young explains the flow of energy. He describes the heart as circulating blood, which then travels through the liver, lungs, and kidneys, eventually returning to the heart. This intricate process culminates in the production of “Jeong” (精), which he defines as pure energy. He emphasizes that while the heart moves blood, it is the stomach, through the digestion of food, that fundamentally generates this vital energy. A disruption in this natural flow, or a “reverse circulation,” can lead to detrimental outcomes, much like making poor choices in life.

3. Prophecies and Spiritual Insight: Beyond Mere Prediction
   Huh Kyung-young asserts his unique ability to foresee future events, citing his predictions of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years prior, as well as Donald Trump’s election one year and two months in advance. He clarifies that these are not mere predictions by a fortune teller but rather insights derived from “Yeongseong” (靈性), or spiritual perception, which differs significantly from ordinary human foresight. He cautions against prematurely disclosing such insights, emphasizing the need for discretion until the events unfold.

4. The Vision for a New Korea: Economic Policies and Electoral Reform
   Huh Kyung-young outlines his ambitious vision for Korea, including his path to the presidency and global unification. He anticipates a 90% voter turnout, with 90% of those votes cast for him. His platform includes a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won (approximately $1,200 USD) for every citizen over 20, aiming to eliminate financial worries and establish a 100% middle-class society. He pledges to fund these initiatives by selling off unnecessary state-owned enterprises and properties, asserting that his commitment to these promises will earn the trust of the electorate.

5. Addressing National Debt and Youth Engagement
   He criticizes past administrations for accumulating massive household debt, which he promises to resolve by having the state repay loans under 500 million won and cover interest payments for others. This, he argues, will revitalize the economy by freeing up citizens’ disposable income. He also proposes lowering the voting age to 14, believing that early participation in democracy will foster civic education and increase overall voter turnout, thereby empowering the youth to shape their future.

6. The Flawed Symbolism of the Korean Flag and Presidential Residence
   Huh Kyung-young critically analyzes the design of the Korean national flag, the “Taegeukgi” (太極旗), and the name of the presidential residence, the “Cheongwadae” (靑瓦臺). He argues that the current arrangement of the trigrams on the flag, representing “Cheonjibi-gwae” (天地否卦), symbolizes national decline and marital discord, where the male principle (heaven) is above the female principle (earth). He advocates for a reversal to “Jicheontae-gwae” (地天泰卦), where the female principle is above, signifying peace and prosperity. Similarly, he criticizes “Cheongwadae” (Blue House) for its association with “blue-collar” workers or prisoners in Western culture, suggesting a more auspicious name like “Haneul-gung” (하늘궁), or “Sky Palace,” which embodies the spirit of the Korean people.

7. The Misguided Approach to Female Leadership and Public Outcry
   He suggests that the public’s reaction to President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the controversies surrounding Choi Soon-sil and Chung Yoo-ra was excessively emotional. He posits that while their actions were not faultless, society should exhibit more leniency towards women’s transgressions compared to men’s. He implies that the intense public outrage was disproportionate, potentially fueled by a lack of understanding or an overly critical perspective.

8. Astrological Predictions and the Perils of Emotional Responses
   Huh Kyung-young delves into the astrological aspects of Park Geun-hye’s birth chart, specifically her “Sinmyosaeng” (辛卯生), or Rabbit year, and its conflict with the “Byeongsinnyeon” (丙申年), or Monkey year, of 2016. He explains that this astrological clash, known as “Wonjinsal” (元辰殺), indicated a year of misfortune and potential conflict, even suggesting the possibility of war. He advises against emotional public protests, arguing that such actions could inadvertently aid North Korea and lead to miscalculations, as the president’s downfall was already astrologically predetermined.

9. Presidential Authority and Economic Emergency Powers
   He defends President Park Geun-hye’s actions, asserting that she did not violate the constitution. He explains that presidents possess broad economic emergency powers, including the authority to direct economic policies, change currency, or implement financial reforms without extensive consultation. He argues that instructing companies to support cultural initiatives or restructure industries falls within the scope of presidential authority, and that criticizing such actions as unconstitutional misunderstands the extent of presidential power, which also includes pardons and emergency decrees.

10. The Contrast with Past Administrations and the “Skirt Wind” Scandal
    Huh Kyung-young contrasts the current scandal with the financial misconduct of previous male presidents and their families, which he claims involved astronomical sums. He suggests that the public’s intense focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt wind” (influence peddling) is disproportionate, especially given that the president’s family members were meticulously managed, but a long-time friend was not. He implies that the scale of past corruption by male leaders far overshadowed the current controversy, yet the public’s outrage is now directed at a female president and her associate.

11. The Absence of Spiritual Leadership in Current Politics
    He criticizes the current political landscape, stating that no existing presidential candidate possesses the “Cheongnyongsang” (靑龍相) (Blue Dragon countenance) or “Hwangnyongsang” (黃龍相) (Yellow Dragon countenance), which he considers essential for true leadership. He dismisses other prominent figures with animal metaphors: Ban Ki-moon as a “tree frog” (청개구리 상), Ahn Cheol-soo as a “goat” (염소 상) prone to sulking, and Moon Jae-in as an “ox” (소지소) destined for exploitation. He asserts that only a leader with spiritual insight, like himself, can genuinely guide the nation.

12. The Call for a Self-Sacrificing Leader
    A visiting philosophy professor from the U.S. echoes Huh Kyung-young’s sentiment, emphasizing the need for a leader willing to make ultimate sacrifices for the nation. The professor notes that while many politicians claim to want to save the country, few are truly prepared to “die” for it. He cites the example of the Yulgok Project, a defense industry scandal that no ordinary politician could resolve without facing severe repercussions, even death. This underscores the necessity of a leader with unwavering resolve and a willingness to confront entrenched corruption, even at personal cost.

13. The Media’s Myopic Focus and Lack of Global Perspective
    Huh Kyung-young criticizes the Korean media for its narrow focus on domestic scandals, particularly the Choi Soon-sil affair, while lacking a “geosijeogin anmok” (巨視的 眼目), or macroscopic perspective, and “geullobeol maindeu” (글로벌 마인드), or global mindset. He recounts an incident where no Korean reporter dared to ask a question during an Obama press conference, highlighting their inability to engage on international issues. He argues that this myopic view prevents a comprehensive understanding of national challenges, contrasting it with the media’s aggressive pursuit of sensational domestic stories.

14. Honoring Heroism and the Need for National Reflection
    He praises the heroism of female figures like Park Ji-young, a Sewol ferry crew member, and Choi Hye-jung, a teacher, who sacrificed their lives to save others. He notes that while former U.S. President Obama honored them with medals and commemorative stamps, Korea failed to adequately recognize their bravery. He uses this as an example of the nation’s misplaced priorities, arguing that such acts of selflessness should be enshrined in textbooks and their families supported with pensions, rather than being overshadowed by political infighting.

15. Economic Policy: Macro vs. Micro and the Household Debt Crisis
    Huh Kyung-young discusses the interplay of “geosi gyeongje” (巨視經濟) (macroeconomics) and “misi gyeongje” (微視經濟) (microeconomics). He points out that while macro-level state-led economic policies, like those of Keynes, can lead to crises (e.g., the Great Depression), micro-level market-oriented approaches, as adopted by Thatcher, Reagan, and Deng Xiaoping, can foster growth. He criticizes Korea’s current economic policies, particularly the rising interest rates on 1,500 trillion won in household debt, which he believes stifles economic activity and pushes citizens into a cycle of debt repayment. He suggests that many participants in the candlelight vigils were driven by economic hardship rather than solely by the Choi Soon-sil scandal.

16. The Importance of Process Over Outcome in Governance
    He emphasizes the critical importance of “yeonhyeok” (沿革), or process, in governance. He criticizes the rapid and opaque establishment of foundations like the Mir and K-Sports foundations, contrasting it with the slow pace of public-initiated projects. He argues that while the outcome might not involve direct theft, the lack of proper procedures and transparency erodes public trust and fuels resentment. He asserts that the public values the integrity of the process more than the final result, and that shortcuts in governance lead to public outrage.

17. The Cycle of Retribution and the Primacy of Spirituality
    Huh Kyung-young introduces the concept of “ingwaeungbo” (因果應報), or karmic retribution, suggesting that President Park Geun-hye’s actions, such as the swift dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party, led to her own impeachment. He stresses that human emotions should be governed by reason, and reason by “Yeongseong” (靈性), or spirituality. He reiterates that spiritual insight allows him to foresee political outcomes, such as Trump’s presidency and Park Geun-hye’s eventual departure, and warns that without such leadership, Korea faces severe peril.

18. Filial Piety and National Honor: A Critique of Leadership
    He discusses “Banpojihyo” (反哺之孝), the filial piety of crows, where offspring care for their aging parents. He extends this concept to human society, defining three types of filial piety: material, emotional, and “Daehyo” (大孝), or great filial piety, which involves bringing honor to one’s family name through personal achievement. He criticizes President Park Geun-hye for failing to uphold “Daehyo,” arguing that her actions brought shame to her parents’ legacy, effectively “burying” their names in a “black hole.”

19. The Three Elements of Filial Piety and Presidential Responsibility
    Huh Kyung-young further elaborates on the three elements of filial piety: “Saengjeonjihyo” (生前之孝) (filial piety during parents’ lifetime), “Sahujihyo” (死後之孝) (filial piety after parents’ death), and “Samhojihyo” (三護之孝) (filial piety through careful management of family affairs). He emphasizes that a child should always remember their parents’ sacrifices and live a life of integrity, especially in public office. He criticizes President Park Geun-hye for failing to maintain “Samhojihyo” by not managing her inner circle effectively and by alienating her own family, which he believes contributed to public distrust and the perception of “bu-gwan-cham-si” (剖棺斬屍), or desecrating her parents’ memory.

20. The Wisdom of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya: Trust and Betrayal
    He recounts the story of Guan Zhong (管仲) and Bao Shuya (鮑叔牙), two friends from ancient China. Bao Shuya recommended Guan Zhong, a former criminal, to Duke Huan of Qi, despite the Duke’s initial reservations. Bao Shuya argued that the nation needed a capable administrator, not a saint. Huh Kyung-young draws a parallel to President Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil, suggesting that while the Chinese story depicts unwavering friendship, the Korean context resulted in “being stabbed in the foot by the trusted axe,” implying betrayal.

21. The Prophecy of the 19th President and the Need for a “Maverick” Leader
    Huh Kyung-young refers to online prophecies that predicted his own rise to the presidency. These prophecies, which accurately foretold events like President Roh Moo-hyun’s suicide and Trump’s election, stated that no current mainstream political figure could become the 19th president. Instead, they suggested that a “maverick” figure, initially dismissed as eccentric, would ultimately lead the nation. He acknowledges the public’s skepticism but asserts that the current political climate, marked by widespread dissatisfaction and a lack of suitable candidates, makes his unconventional path a plausible reality.

22. The Power of the Name and Spiritual Healing
    Huh Kyung-young demonstrates his unique spiritual abilities, claiming that merely invoking his name can bring about healing and positive change. He performs a “power test” where individuals lose strength when calling out the names of Jesus or Buddha, but regain it when calling his name. He states that his presence, even through a photograph or phone screen, can heal illnesses and reverse the aging process. He emphasizes that he is not a religious figure but a being from a higher dimension, here to bring about a new era of spiritual and physical well-being.

반포지효(反哺之孝)-(Filial piety of a crow, Repaying kindness, Reciprocal care)

Meaning in context: Refers to the filial piety of a crow feeding its old parents, used to emphasize the importance of children honoring their parents.

입신출세(立身出世)-(Success in life, Rise in the world, Achieving prominence)
Meaning in context: Achieving success and making one’s family name famous, a higher form of filial piety.

생존지효(生存之孝)-(Filial piety during lifetime, Living filial piety)
Meaning in context: Filial piety shown to parents while they are alive.

사후지효(死後之孝)-(Filial piety after death, Posthumous filial piety)
Meaning in context: Filial piety shown after parents have passed away, often by remembering their virtues and managing family affairs well.

부관참시(剖棺斬屍)-(Posthumous decapitation, Disgrace after death, Desecration of a corpse)
Meaning in context: A severe act of dishonoring the deceased, used metaphorically to describe actions that bring shame to one’s ancestors.

인과응보(因果應報)-(Karma, Retribution, Poetic justice)
Meaning in context: The idea that one’s actions, whether good or bad, will eventually lead to corresponding consequences.

감성(感性)-(Sensibility, Emotion, Feeling)
Meaning in context: Emotional responses or feelings, which should ideally be guided by reason and spiritual insight.

이성(理性)-(Reason, Rationality, Intellect)
Meaning in context: The faculty of logical thought and objective judgment, which should govern emotions.

지성(知性)-(Intellect, Intelligence, Understanding)
Meaning in context: Intellectual capacity or understanding, which is still subordinate to spiritual insight.

영성(靈性)-(Spirituality, Spiritual insight, Divine nature)
Meaning in context: A higher form of insight that allows one to perceive future events and guide political decisions.

관포지교(管鮑之交)-(Friendship of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya, Deep friendship, Unwavering loyalty)
Meaning in context: A metaphor for a deep and trusting friendship, used to describe the relationship between Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil.

정정당당(正正堂堂)-(Fair and square, Open and aboveboard, Honorable)
Meaning in context: Acting in an honest and upright manner, especially in political contests.

잉태(孕胎)-(Conception, Pregnancy, Being born)
Meaning in context: Being conceived and born in the usual human way, contrasting with the speaker’s claim of a different origin.

종교(宗敎)-(Religion, Faith, Creed)
Meaning in context: Organized systems of belief and worship, which the speaker claims to transcend or dislike the “religious acts” of.

수명(壽命)-(Lifespan, Longevity, Life expectancy)
Meaning in context: The length of one’s life, which the speaker claims can be extended by invoking his name.

탄핵(彈劾)-(Impeachment, Censure, Accusation)
Meaning in context: The formal process of charging a public official with misconduct, specifically referring to the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye.

당선(當選)-(Election, Being elected, Winning an election)
Meaning in context: The act of winning an election, as in the election of Donald Trump or the speaker’s own presidential aspirations.

예언(預言)-(Prophecy, Prediction, Foretelling)
Meaning in context: The act of predicting future events, which the speaker claims to do through “spirituality” rather than mere fortune-telling.

영성(靈性)-(Spirituality, Spiritual insight, Divine nature)
Meaning in context: A higher, intuitive way of seeing and understanding events, distinct from ordinary prediction.

유권자(有權者)-(Voter, Elector, Franchise holder)
Meaning in context: Individuals who have the right to vote in an election.

중산층(中産層)-(Middle class, Bourgeoisie)
Meaning in context: The social and economic group between the upper and lower classes, which the speaker promises to elevate all citizens into.

혁명(革命)-(Revolution, Uprising, Radical change)
Meaning in context: A fundamental and often violent change in power or organizational structures, contrasted with change through voting.

민주주의(民主主義)-(Democracy, Democratic system)
Meaning in context: A system of government where citizens exercise power through elected representatives, emphasizing the importance of voting.

학점(學點)-(Academic credit, Grade point)
Meaning in context: Points awarded for academic achievement, which the speaker proposes to link to voting participation.

국회의원(國會議員)-(Member of Parliament, Legislator, Congressman)
Meaning in context: Elected representatives who serve in the national assembly.

비상계엄(非常戒嚴)-(Martial law, State of emergency)
Meaning in context: A temporary imposition of military rule over civilian government, which the speaker suggests would follow his election.

세계통일(世界統一)-(World unification, Global unity)
Meaning in context: The ultimate goal of uniting the world under a single leadership, which the speaker claims his nation will achieve.

기부(寄附)-(Donation, Contribution, Giving)
Meaning in context: The act of giving money or goods to a charity or cause.

천부경(天符經)-(Cheonbugyeong, Heavenly Code Scripture)
Meaning in context: An ancient Korean scripture, cited by the speaker as a source of wisdom regarding gender roles.

주역(周易)-(I Ching, Book of Changes)
Meaning in context: An ancient Chinese divination text, also cited by the speaker to interpret the symbolism of the Korean flag.

Huh Kyung-young’s Vision for Korea and the World

1. Basic Information

• Lecture Session and Date: 1055th Huh Kyung-young Saturday Lecture, 2016.12.03
• One-sentence main theme or title summary: Huh Kyung-young discusses his prophecies regarding the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and the election of Donald Trump, outlining his vision for becoming president with 90% of the vote to unify the world and implement radical policies for national prosperity.
• Location: Not specified in the source, implied to be a lecture hall.
• Key Segments:
  • Prophecies and Spiritual Insight: Huh Kyung-young highlights his past predictions of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and Donald Trump’s election, emphasizing these are not mere predictions but insights derived from spiritual vision.
  • Critique of Korean Politics and Society: He criticizes the current political landscape, media, and even the national symbols like the Taegeukgi (Korean flag) and Cheong Wa Dae (Blue House) for contributing to national misfortune and division.
  • Presidential Candidacy and Policies: Huh Kyung-young outlines his platform, including a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won per person, elimination of household debt, and educational reforms, asserting these will lead to his election with overwhelming support.
  • The Importance of Women and Spiritual Leadership: He advocates for respecting women, drawing parallels to traditional wisdom and criticizing the excessive focus on female politicians’ wrongdoings. He also stresses the need for a spiritual leader with foresight.
  • Healing and Divine Power: The lecture concludes with demonstrations of his ability to heal illnesses and impart energy simply by calling his name or looking at his picture, positioning himself as a unique, non-religious figure with extraordinary powers.

2. Core Messages
3. The Path to Success and Failure is Determined by Choice: “그러니까 그리로 가다가 일로 왔구만 [웃음] 길이 우리가 젊을 때는 요거는 성공이고, 요거는 실패인데 이렇게 보면 출발 지점에서 두 사람이 갔잖아요 두 사람이 이렇게 갔으면 처음에는 뭐, 이 거리가 없어요 성공하는 사람이나 실패하는 사람이나 뭐 대학교 때나 군대 갈 때나 보면 비슷해 재벌 아들이나 일반 학생이나, 다 비슷한데 이게 세월이 흘러가 보면 이렇게, 이렇게 돼야 안 돼요? 되죠 그러니까 이 사람은 이 사람을 볼 수가 없어요 이 사람은 이 사람은 까마득하게 잊어버리는 거야 이게 한 라인에서 출발한 친구야 집안 형편도 비슷해 그런데 얘가 무슨 길로 가느냐? 지금 대모장으로 가느냐, 허경영한테 가서 이 강의를 한번 듣느냐? 여기에 따라서 인생의 가는 길이 달라져, 안 달라져요?”

• Explanation: Life’s trajectory, whether towards success or failure, is shaped by the choices one makes, even seemingly small ones like attending a lecture versus participating in a protest.

2. Prophecies are Not Mere Fortune-Telling but Spiritual Insight: “이야기했는데 이것은 그냥 예언이 아니고 점쟁이들의 예언이 아닙니다 그냥 예언이 아니에요 이거는 영성으로 보는 거니까 일반 사람들하고 좀 달라요”

• Explanation: His predictions, such as those concerning political events, stem from a higher spiritual understanding, distinguishing them from ordinary predictions or fortune-telling.

3. Korea’s National Symbols and Societal Issues Reflect Misfortune: “그러니까 우리 국민들은 청와대 이름도 망 쪽으로 들게 만들어 놓고 태극기도 망조가 들게 만들어 놓고 그러면 매일 이혼만 하고 결혼 안 하고 엄마 아빠 싸우는 거니까 자식들이 장가 안 간다 이거예요 맨날 왜 돈 때문에 싸우는 거야”

• Explanation: The current names of national institutions and the design of the national flag are inherently flawed, contributing to societal problems like family discord and economic struggles.

4. Radical Economic Policies are Necessary for National Revival: “국민 한 사람당 배당금을 월 150만 원을 주겠다 20살 이상 통장에 매달 돈이 들어온다 돈 때문에 걱정하는 사람은 없다 우리나라 사람은 100% 중산층이 된다 그렇게 하겠어요, 안 하겠어요? 그 말을 딱 실현하겠다고 할 때 내 얼굴을 본 사람은 무조건 찍어서, 저 사람은 약속 지킬 사람이 틀림없어”

• Explanation: Implementing policies like universal basic income and debt relief, funded by selling state assets, is crucial to revitalize the economy and elevate the living standards of all citizens.

5. True Leadership Requires Spiritual Vision and a Willingness to Sacrifice: “그러니까 시대가 어떤 분을 요구하냐면요, “나 죽겠다는 거야 대한민국 구하겠다는 거야.” 지금 장롱이라고 하시는 분들 얘기 들어보면요, 이분들이 국가를 구하겠다고는 다 해요 근데 그 안에를 자세히 들여다보면요, 죽기까지는 아니야 이게 문제라니까”

• Explanation: Effective national leadership demands not just political skill but profound spiritual insight and an unwavering commitment, even to the point of self-sacrifice, to truly save the nation.

3. Detailed Summary

• Opening and the Divergent Paths of Life
  • Topic: The significance of individual choices in shaping destiny.
  • Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young welcomes attendees, noting their “blessed” choice to come to his lecture instead of a protest. He explains that while people start life similarly, their paths diverge significantly based on their decisions.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the analogy of two friends starting from the same point, one choosing the path of protest and the other attending his lecture, to illustrate how these choices lead to vastly different outcomes over time. He also compares it to students who study diligently versus those who get sidetracked, emphasizing long-term benefits over immediate gains.
  • Practical Message: Choosing to engage with his teachings, even without immediate tangible benefits, will lead to immense future rewards.
• Prophecies and Spiritual Foresight
  • Topic: The nature of Huh Kyung-young’s prophecies.
  • Main Assertions: He asserts that he predicted President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years prior, and Donald Trump’s election one year and two months prior. He clarifies that these are not mere predictions but come from “spirituality” (영성), a different realm from ordinary fortune-telling.
  • Analogies/Examples: He contrasts his spiritual foresight with the predictions of fortune-tellers, implying a deeper, more accurate source of information. He also mentions the need to keep such prophecies secret until they manifest to avoid disruption.
  • Practical Message: His words are backed by a unique spiritual insight that transcends conventional understanding, urging listeners to trust his vision.
• Vision for Presidency and National Transformation
  • Topic: Huh Kyung-young’s presidential platform and path to power.
  • Main Assertions: He declares his intention to become president with 90% of the vote, unifying the world. His key policies include a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won for all citizens over 20, eliminating financial worries and creating a 100% middle-class society. He also proposes lowering the voting age to 14 to foster democratic education and increase voter turnout.
  • Analogies/Examples: He compares his initial low poll numbers to Trump’s, predicting a surge in support once his policies are widely known. He suggests that selling off unnecessary state assets would fund these initiatives. He also links the current political turmoil (Park Geun-hye’s situation) to increased youth voter turnout, which he believes will benefit him.
  • Practical Message: His presidency will bring unprecedented economic stability and democratic engagement, solving the nation’s problems through radical, direct action.
• Critique of Korean Symbols and Gender Dynamics
  • Topic: The inherent flaws in Korea’s national symbols and the importance of respecting women.
  • Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young argues that the Taegeukgi (Korean flag) and the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House) are designed in ways that bring misfortune and division, based on principles from the I Ching (주역). He emphasizes that societies and families prosper when women are respected and empowered, contrasting this with the patriarchal structures he believes lead to ruin.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the I Ching’s “Heaven and Earth Obstruction Hexagram” (천지비괘) to explain how the current flag design signifies national decline, advocating for the “Earth and Heaven Peace Hexagram” (지천태괘) which places the feminine (earth) above the masculine (heaven). He cites historical examples of queens managing royal affairs and the downfall of the Joseon Dynasty due to excessive concubines. He also criticizes the name “Blue House” for its association with “blue-collar” workers or prisoners, contrasting it with the “White House.”
  • Practical Message: Reforming national symbols and adopting a more respectful, matriarchal approach to gender roles is essential for national harmony and prosperity.
• Analysis of Park Geun-hye’s Fate and the Dangers of Emotionalism
  • Topic: Astrological and spiritual reasons behind Park Geun-hye’s political downfall and a warning against emotional reactions.
  • Main Assertions: He analyzes Park Geun-hye’s birth chart, noting that 2016 (병신년) was an “original sin year” (원진살) for her, making it difficult for her to survive politically. He warns against excessive public protests, suggesting they play into the hands of North Korea and could lead to misjudgment. He argues that while Park Geun-hye made mistakes, the public’s emotional response is disproportionate and harmful.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the concept of “원진살” (a karmic conflict in 사주) to explain Park Geun-hye’s difficulties. He references the fall of Vietnam, where key figures were spies, to caution against internal division. He also mentions the burning of Park Chung-hee’s birthplace and the Seomun Market fire as signs of misfortune related to Park Geun-hye’s situation.
  • Practical Message: While accountability is important, emotional overreactions to political events can destabilize the nation and should be avoided in favor of a more rational and spiritually guided approach.
• Critique of Media and the Need for “Macro” Perspective
  • Topic: The media’s narrow focus and lack of global perspective.
  • Main Assertions: Huh Kyung-young criticizes the Korean media for sensationalizing issues like the “Choi Soon-sil scandal” and misrepresenting facts (e.g., US beef safety). He highlights their inability to engage in international discourse, as demonstrated by Korean reporters’ silence during an Obama press conference. He argues that the media and public often focus on “micro” issues while ignoring “macro” historical and economic contexts.
  • Analogies/Examples: He contrasts the media’s intense focus on Choi Soon-sil with their past leniency towards corruption involving male presidents’ relatives. He uses the example of US beef, claiming it’s healthier than Korean beef, to illustrate media distortion. The anecdote of Korean reporters failing to ask questions at an Obama press conference, leading a Chinese reporter to step in, serves as a powerful example of Korea’s lack of global mindset.
  • Practical Message: The public and media should adopt a “macro” or global perspective, moving beyond sensationalism and emotional reactions to understand broader national and international issues.
• Heroism of Women and Economic Solutions
  • Topic: Recognizing female heroism and proposing solutions for Korea’s economic woes.
  • Main Assertions: He praises female heroes like Sewol ferry crew member Park Ji-young and teacher Choi Hye-jung, who sacrificed their lives to save others, contrasting their bravery with the cowardice of male crew members. He criticizes Korea for not honoring them adequately, unlike the US (Obama). He then reiterates his economic policies, including debt relief and educational reform, as solutions to the nation’s 1500 trillion won household debt.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the examples of Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung to underscore the importance of female leadership and sacrifice, noting Obama’s recognition of them with medals and commemorative stamps. He connects the household debt crisis to the public’s participation in protests, suggesting economic hardship is a primary driver. He also contrasts “macro” (state-led) and “micro” (individual-led) economic approaches, citing China’s Deng Xiaoping and the UK’s Thatcher.
  • Practical Message: Honoring true heroes, especially women, and implementing his comprehensive economic and educational reforms are vital to overcome national debt and revitalize the economy.
• The Importance of Process, Not Just Results, and Spiritual Leadership
  • Topic: The significance of due process and the necessity of spiritual leadership.
  • Main Assertions: He criticizes the rapid and opaque process behind the dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, arguing that the “process” (연혁, 과정) is more important than the “result.” He emphasizes that emotional responses are inferior to reason, which in turn is inferior to “spirituality” (영성). He asserts that only a leader with spiritual insight, like himself, can truly guide the nation.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the examples of the quick dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the rapid establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations to highlight the lack of due process. He contrasts the “emotion” (감성), “reason” (이성), and “spirituality” (영성) as hierarchical levels of understanding, positioning spirituality as the highest. He reiterates his ability to foresee events like Trump’s presidency through spiritual vision.
  • Practical Message: For a healthy democracy and national future, transparency and proper process are paramount, and the nation desperately needs a leader guided by spiritual foresight rather than mere emotion or reason.
• Filial Piety and the State of the Nation
  • Topic: The concept of filial piety and its relevance to national leadership.
  • Main Assertions: He explains the three types of filial piety (material, emotional, and achieving success to honor parents), contrasting it with Park Geun-hye’s actions, which he views as bringing shame to her parents’ legacy. He emphasizes the importance of remembering parents’ sacrifices and maintaining family harmony, which he believes Park Geun-hye failed to do.
  • Analogies/Examples: He uses the “crow’s filial piety” (반포지효) to illustrate the concept, noting that while crows provide for their parents, they cannot achieve “great filial piety” (대효) by bringing honor to their family name. He criticizes Park Geun-hye for not inviting her siblings to national holidays, suggesting it fueled public suspicion. He also recounts witnessing someone attempting to desecrate Park Chung-hee’s grave, linking it to the broader disrespect for the past.
  • Practical Message: Leaders must embody true filial piety, honoring their predecessors and maintaining family unity, as these virtues reflect a broader capacity for national leadership and integrity.
• The Unique Power of Huh Kyung-young
  • Topic: Demonstrations of Huh Kyung-young’s unique spiritual and healing abilities.
  • Main Assertions: He demonstrates his ability to heal people and impart energy simply by having them call his name or look at his picture. He claims his energy is opposite to that of ordinary humans, and that calling his name can reverse aging and extend life. He states he is not bound by religion and that his power is unique on Earth.
  • Analogies/Examples: He performs a “strength test” where people lose strength when calling other names (Jesus, Buddha, their own) but gain immense strength when calling his name. He uses a “stethoscope” analogy with his hand to detect illnesses like cancer and then “heals” them instantly. He mentions that this power works even remotely, through a phone screen.
  • Practical Message: Huh Kyung-young possesses extraordinary, non-religious healing and life-enhancing powers, and simply invoking his name or image can bring immediate benefits and spiritual transformation.

4. Key Quotes Collection
5. “데모장으로 안 가고 일로 온 사람들은 상당히 복이 있는 사람들이네.”

• Context: Welcoming attendees and highlighting their fortunate choice.

2. “이것은 그냥 예언이 아니고 점쟁이들의 예언이 아닙니다. 그냥 예언이 아니에요. 이거는 영성으로 보는 거니까 일반 사람들하고 좀 달라요.”

• Context: Explaining the source of his prophecies about political events.

3. “국민 한 사람당 배당금을 월 150만 원을 주겠다. 20살 이상 통장에 매달 돈이 들어온다. 돈 때문에 걱정하는 사람은 없다. 우리나라 사람은 100% 중산층이 된다.”

• Context: Outlining a core economic policy of his presidential platform.

4. “물론 내가 대통령 되면 14살부터 투표를 하게 해줄 거야. 왜냐하면 중학생이 엄마하고 손을 잡고 투표를 가서 해봐야 민주주의를 배우기 때문이야.”

• Context: Proposing a reform to lower the voting age for democratic education.

5. “그러니까 우리 국민들은 청와대 이름도 망 쪽으로 들게 만들어 놓고 태극기도 망조가 들게 만들어 놓고 그러면 매일 이혼만 하고 결혼 안 하고 엄마 아빠 싸우는 거니까 자식들이 장가 안 간다 이거예요.”

• Context: Criticizing national symbols for bringing misfortune and societal problems.

6. “여자를 무시하는 집안은 잘 되지만 있어요, 없어요? 없어요. 여자를 대우를 잘하는 집이 잘못된 집이 있었어요? 없어요.”

• Context: Emphasizing the importance of respecting women for family and national prosperity.

7. “가만히 있어도 대통령은 물러나요. 가만히 있어도 최순실은 감옥에 들어갑니다. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 대한민국 국민이 그대로 놔두나? 검찰이 그대로 있나요? 그런데 괜히 감정적으로 대하면은, 감정 폭발한다고 막 떠들면 그게 누구 도와주는 거예요? 북한을 도와주는 거예요.”

• Context: Warning against emotional protests and their potential to destabilize the nation.

8. “우리 한국 기자들은 뭐요? 미시적인 안목으로 보는 거야. 지금 우리가 최순실 사태를 바라보는 것도 거시적으로 바라봐야 돼요.”

• Context: Criticizing the media’s narrow focus and advocating for a broader, “macro” perspective.

9. “여태까지 친 혈육들이 해보는 것보다 친구가 한 거니까 대통령이 모를 수 있어요. 그래 안 그래? 혈육 단속은 철저히 했는데 친구 단속을 못한 거지. 그게 대통령이 잘못한 거지.”

• Context: Offering a nuanced view on Park Geun-hye’s involvement in the Choi Soon-sil scandal.

10. “이 감성이라는 것은 이성의 지배를 받아 안 받아요? 그러면 이상은 뭐의 지배를 받아야 돼요? 이성이 지성이에요. 영성을 못 따라가.”

• Context: Explaining the hierarchy of human understanding, with spirituality (영성) as the highest.

11. “시대가 어떤 분을 요구하냐면요, “나 죽겠다는 거야 대한민국 구하겠다는 거야.” 지금 장롱이라고 하시는 분들 얘기 들어보면요, 이분들이 국가를 구하겠다고는 다 해요. 근데 그 안에를 자세히 들여다보면요, 죽기까지는 아니야. 이게 문제라니까.”

• Context: Describing the kind of selfless, sacrificial leadership required for national salvation.

12. “이 지구상에서 내 이름만 그래. 그러면 내 사진만 보면 그래요. 여러분 사진은 그냥 부처님도 떨어지고 예수님도 떨어진다. 허경영을 부르면 병이 일단 좋아져.”

• Context: Demonstrating his unique healing and energy-imparting abilities.

5. Mindmap Structure

• Core Theme: Huh Kyung-young’s Vision for National Salvation and Global Unification through Spiritual Leadership and Radical Policies
  • I. The Path to Success and Spiritual Insight
  • A. Choice and Destiny
  • 1. Divergent paths from similar beginnings
  • 2. Long-term benefits of wise choices (e.g., attending lecture vs. protest)
  • B. Nature of Prophecy
  • 1. Not fortune-telling, but “spirituality” (영성)
  • 2. Foresight into political events (Park Geun-hye, Trump)
  • II. Critique of Current Korea
  • A. Flawed National Symbols
  • 1. Taegeukgi (Korean flag) design leads to misfortune (천지비괘)
  • 2. “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House) name is problematic (blue-collar, prisoners)
  • 3. Need for change (지천태괘, “Haneulgung”)
  • B. Societal Issues
  • 1. Lack of respect for women leads to family and national decline
  • 2. Media’s “micro” focus and lack of global perspective
  • 3. Emotionalism in public discourse (e.g., protests)
  • C. Economic Crisis
  • 1. 1500 trillion won household debt
  • 2. Rising interest rates and loan restrictions
  • 3. Lack of effective political solutions
  • III. Huh Kyung-young’s Presidential Platform
  • A. Economic Policies
  • 1. Monthly dividend of 1.5 million won per person (over 20)
  • 2. Elimination of household debt (up to 500 million won)
  • 3. Funding through sale of state assets (국유지, 국가 기업)
  • 4. Goal: 100% middle-class society
  • B. Educational Reforms
  • 1. Abolition of college entrance exams (수능)
  • 2. Focus on individual talents (e.g., 6 years of music for Seoul National University)
  • 3. Elimination of private tutoring expenses
  • C. Political Reforms
  • 1. Lowering voting age to 14
  • 2. Strong presidential system (not beholden to parliament)
  • 3. World unification under Korea
  • IV. The Importance of Women and Filial Piety
  • A. Respect for Women
  • 1. Prosperity linked to valuing women (I Ching principles)
  • 2. Heroism of women (Park Ji-young, Choi Hye-jung)
  • 3. Critique of excessive criticism of female politicians
  • B. Filial Piety (효도)
  • 1. Three types: material, emotional, achieving success (대효)
  • 2. Park Geun-hye’s actions seen as shaming parents’ legacy
  • 3. Importance of remembering parents’ sacrifices and family unity
  • V. Huh Kyung-young’s Unique Abilities
  • A. Healing and Energy Impartation
  • 1. Instant healing by calling his name or seeing his picture
  • 2. Reversing aging and extending lifespan
  • 3. Unique energy, opposite to humans
  • B. Non-Religious Nature
  • 1. Not bound by any religion
  • 3. Direct connection to divine power

6. Historical / Doctrinal Connections
   This lecture by Huh Kyung-young builds upon several established teachings and introduces new emphasis points:

• Divine-Human Theory and Spiritual Power: The core assertion that his prophecies are derived from “spirituality” (영성) rather than mere prediction directly connects to his long-standing divine-human theory, where he positions himself as a celestial being incarnated to save humanity. His demonstrations of healing and energy transfer are practical manifestations of this claimed divine power, a consistent theme in his lectures.
• 33 Policies (or similar radical economic plans): The detailed economic proposals, such as the monthly dividend of 1.5 million won and the elimination of household debt , are consistent with his “33 policies” or similar comprehensive economic reform packages he has advocated for years. These policies are always presented as radical, direct solutions to national economic woes, funded by reallocating national wealth.
• Critique of Traditional Politics and Media: His strong criticism of existing political parties, the media’s “micro” focus , and the need for a leader with “spiritual vision” are recurring themes. He consistently portrays himself as the only viable alternative to a corrupt and ineffective political establishment.
• Emphasis on National Symbols and I Ching: The detailed critique of the Taegeukgi and Cheong Wa Dae based on I Ching principles is a newly emphasized point in this lecture. While he has previously touched on national identity, this deep dive into the esoteric meaning of national symbols and their supposed negative influence is a more developed aspect of his teaching, linking national misfortune to fundamental design flaws.
• Role of Women and Filial Piety: The strong advocacy for respecting women and the detailed explanation of filial piety are also given significant emphasis. This connects to his broader vision of a harmonious society, but the specific examples (Sewol ferry heroines, Park Geun-hye’s perceived failure in filial piety) provide a contemporary and culturally resonant application of these principles.
• Global Unification: The mention of “world unification” as an ultimate goal of his presidency is a consistent, high-level doctrinal point, reinforcing his global ambitions beyond just Korea.

7. Action Items & Blessing Guidance

8. Prioritize Spiritual Insight over Emotional Reactions: Actively seek to understand situations through a “spiritual” (영성) lens rather than being swayed by “emotion” (감성) or even mere “reason” (이성), especially concerning national and political events.

9. Call Upon Huh Kyung-young’s Name or View His Image: To receive healing, energy, and even reverse aging, regularly call his name or look at his picture. This is presented as a direct way to connect with his unique power.

10. Support Huh Kyung-young’s Presidential Vision: Understand and advocate for his radical policies, such as universal basic income and debt relief, as the only viable path to national prosperity and global unification.

11. Cultivate Respect for Women and Filial Piety: Apply the principles of respecting women in your family and community, and practice true filial piety by honoring your parents and ancestors, both materially and by bringing honor to their name.

12. Adopt a “Macro” Perspective: Avoid getting caught up in sensationalized “micro” issues presented by the media; instead, strive for a broader, “macro” understanding of national and international affairs.

13. One-Sentence Overall Summary
    Huh Kyung-young, leveraging his spiritual foresight that accurately predicted major political events, presents himself as Korea’s sole hope, advocating for a presidency that will implement radical economic and social reforms, rectify national symbols, and foster a society built on respect for women and spiritual wisdom, ultimately leading to global unification and individual well-being through his unique divine power.

The Prophetic Vision of Huh Kyung-young: A Blueprint for Global Unification

1. The Divergent Paths of Life and the Prophetic Insight of Huh Kyung-young
   Life’s journey often presents individuals with seemingly similar starting points, yet their paths diverge dramatically over time. For instance, two individuals may begin with comparable backgrounds, whether in university or military service, much like the son of a wealthy family and an ordinary student. However, as time progresses, their destinies unfold in vastly different ways. One may achieve success, while the other faces failure, eventually losing sight of their former peer. This divergence underscores the critical importance of the choices made at pivotal moments. Attending a protest, for example, versus engaging with a lecture by Huh Kyung-young, can fundamentally alter one’s life trajectory. While immediate material gain may not be apparent from attending a lecture, the long-term benefits are immeasurable. Neglecting education in youth for immediate gratification, or being swayed from diligent study or vocational training, can lead to ruin. The early choices in life are paramount, as a misstep can irrevocably change one’s entire existence.

2. The Energetic Core of Human Existence and the Path to Prosperity
   The human body’s intricate systems, such as the spleen and stomach, represent a central earth element. The heart, as the primary organ, circulates blood through the liver, lungs, and kidneys, ensuring oxygenation and filtration before returning to the heart. This circulatory process is vital, as blood also nourishes the stomach, which, along with the spleen, requires it. Ultimately, this complex system generates “essence,” which is pure energy. While blood circulation is crucial, the stomach’s role in processing food is fundamental; without it, the entire system would cease. The stomach is the primary producer of energy, whereas the heart merely propels blood, generating “qi” or vital force. Similarly, on a Saturday, if one person chooses leisure, another attends a protest, and a third seeks out Huh Kyung-young’s lecture, the outcome for the latter will be profoundly different. Those who attend the lecture gain invaluable insight, while others remain unaware of the profound benefits.

3. Prophecies Fulfilled: The Impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and the Election of Donald Trump
   Huh Kyung-young’s prophetic abilities extend to significant political events. He foretold the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and the candlelight vigils four years prior to their occurrence. The election of Donald Trump was also predicted a year and two months in advance. These are not mere predictions by a fortune-teller but insights derived from spiritual vision, differing significantly from ordinary foresight. Such prophecies are not to be openly discussed until their fulfillment. For instance, the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye was only publicly acknowledged after it became a reality, despite earlier private pronouncements. Similarly, the prediction of Trump’s victory was kept confidential until his election. The public was led to believe that the outcome was uncertain, even though the prediction had been made on television. A Hillary Clinton presidency, it was stated, would have led to war on the Korean Peninsula.

4. The Vision of a Unified World and a New Political Paradigm
   Huh Kyung-young envisions a future where he becomes president with an overwhelming mandate, leading to the unification of the world. This vision posits that out of 50 million citizens, approximately 36 million eligible voters would participate in an election, with 90% casting their ballots. Of these, 90% would vote for him. Initially, polls might show him with a mere 0.1% support, similar to Trump’s early standing. However, this would gradually increase to 10%, then 30%, and eventually 50%. During televised debates, his pledge to provide 1.5 million won per month to every citizen over 20, ensuring financial security and elevating all Koreans to the middle class, would resonate deeply. This promise, coupled with a perceived commitment to fulfill it, even if it means selling off state-owned assets, would secure a 90% victory. Such a mandate would transcend traditional party lines, as citizens would recognize the immense personal financial benefit—2 billion won per person, or 8 billion won for a family of four, over a lifetime. The current political system, where politicians allegedly siphon off national wealth, leaves citizens struggling despite a high GNP. The recent events surrounding President Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra would galvanize young voters, who previously only turned out for figures like Roh Moo-hyun. This new era would see young people realizing the power of the ballot box, moving beyond armed revolution or military coups.

5. Reforming the Electoral System: Empowering Youth and Elevating National Participation
   A key reform proposed is lowering the voting age to 14. This would allow middle school students to participate in elections alongside their parents, fostering an early understanding of democracy. Non-participation would result in academic penalties, potentially hindering university admission or future career prospects. This incentive would encourage parents to bring their children to the polls, thereby increasing overall voter turnout. The rationale is that 14-year-olds today are more intellectually capable than 24-year-olds of the past. Denying them suffrage confines them to an education system that stifles their potential. Granting them voting rights would empower them to influence policies, such as the abolition of private tutoring and the college entrance exam, by voting for candidates who support these changes. Witnessing their parents exercise their sovereign right would instill a profound appreciation for democratic principles.

6. The Flawed Symbolism of the Korean Flag and the Importance of Female Leadership
   The current design of the Korean flag, the Taegeukgi, is fundamentally flawed and portends national misfortune. The trigrams, representing heaven (male) and earth (female), are positioned incorrectly. The male principle is placed above the female, symbolizing a state of disharmony, known in the I Ching as “Cheonjibi-gwae,” which signifies ruin. This arrangement leads to constant conflict, akin to marital strife, and prevents the harmonious interaction necessary for prosperity and the flourishing of offspring. A correct arrangement, “Jicheontae-gwae,” places the female principle above the male, symbolizing peace and prosperity. This signifies that the earth’s energy descends, and the male’s energy ascends, creating a fertile ground for life and harmony. A household where the man is authoritarian and the woman is subservient is destined for failure. Historically, respected households empowered women, entrusting them with household keys and significant authority. Even in royal courts, queens often held substantial power, managing affairs and even influencing the fate of kings. The current flag, designed hastily by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, reflects a misunderstanding of these profound principles, leading to a national symbol that invites division and misfortune. The name of the presidential residence, Cheong Wa Dae (Blue House), is also problematic, as “blue collar” is associated with prisoners or laborers, contrasting with the “White House” of the wealthy.

7. The Misguided Perception of Female Wrongdoing and the Call for Compassion
   The public’s reaction to the controversies surrounding President Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra, all women, has been excessively emotional. While their actions may not have been entirely faultless, there is a need for greater leniency when women commit offenses, compared to men. The current fervor surrounding the “skirt-chasing scandal” appears disproportionately harsh. It is crucial to view such situations with a broader perspective, rather than succumbing to emotional outbursts that could destabilize the nation.

8. Astrological Insights into Political Destinies: Park Geun-hye’s Predicament
   Astrological analysis reveals insights into political figures’ destinies. President Park Geun-hye’s birth chart, specifically her “Shinmyo” year, indicates a “Wonjinsal” (a type of karmic conflict) with the “Byeongsin” year (2016). This suggests that 2016 would be a challenging year for her, making it difficult to navigate. This astrological alignment also hints at the possibility of war between North and South Korea. The ongoing protests, while seemingly aimed at the president, inadvertently aid North Korea by creating internal instability. President Park’s removal from office and Choi Soon-sil’s imprisonment would occur naturally through legal processes, without the need for emotional public demonstrations that could be exploited by external forces.

9. The Legacy of Park Chung-hee and the Intergenerational Karmic Echo
   Examining President Park Chung-hee’s birth chart, born in the “Jeongsa” year (Year of the Snake) and on a “Gyeongsin” day (Day of the Monkey), reveals a unique destiny. His chart contains “Insin-sa-hae,” a combination associated with revolutionary figures and decisive action. Such individuals possess an unstoppable force. While many share similar birth charts, their destinies diverge due to factors like the partners they choose and their physical appearance (physiognomy). Therefore, a birth chart only accounts for a minuscule 0.1% of one’s fate, with the “Daeun” (major luck cycle) playing a more significant role. President Park Geun-hye’s current “Daeun” is unfavorable in the “Byeongsin” year, marked by “Wonjinsal,” indicating conflict and misfortune. This astrological alignment suggests a period of national humiliation and her eventual departure from power, even if she remains in office. The power of a leader is not merely in their position but in their ability to command respect and influence.

10. The Perils of Misguided Public Sentiment and the Manipulation of Information
    It is crucial to transcend male-centric thinking and avoid excessive condemnation of women’s mistakes. While President Park Geun-hye’s actions may have been flawed, the public’s reaction, fueled by emotional outrage, is disproportionate. Such intense conflict should be reserved for external threats, not internal disputes. The unique circumstances of President Park’s upbringing and her close relationship with certain individuals, while perhaps unconventional, do not necessarily constitute a violation of the constitution.

11. The President’s Prerogatives and the Misinterpretation of Constitutional Authority
    President Park Geun-hye’s actions, such as promoting cultural enrichment projects or directing economic policies, fall within the scope of her presidential powers. Presidents possess emergency economic powers, including the authority to change currency or implement financial real-name systems without extensive consultation. Discussing such sensitive matters with close confidantes, rather than official channels, is a common practice to prevent leaks. Therefore, accusing her of constitutional violations for exercising these prerogatives is a misinterpretation of the law. The focus should be on holding individuals like Choi Soon-sil accountable for any wrongdoing, rather than unjustly implicating the president. As a legal scholar specializing in constitutional law, Huh Kyung-young asserts that President Park did not violate the constitution.

12. The Astronomical Scale of Past Corruption and the Disproportionate Focus on Minor Scandals
    Previous male presidents accumulated astronomical levels of household debt, estimated at 1,500 trillion won, with hundreds of trillions allegedly siphoned off. In contrast, President Park Geun-hye is not perceived as someone who would embezzle national funds. The public’s intense focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-chasing scandal” pales in comparison to the vast sums misappropriated by previous administrations and their associates. This disproportionate attention to a relatively minor issue, while ignoring systemic corruption, is a misdirection of public energy. Attending Huh Kyung-young’s lectures offers more benefit than participating in such protests.

13. The Absence of Visionary Leadership and the Need for a “Blue Dragon” President
    The current political landscape lacks visionary leaders capable of guiding the nation. Among the presidential candidates, there is no one with the “Blue Dragon” or “Yellow Dragon” physiognomy, which signifies exceptional leadership. Ban Ki-moon, for instance, is described as a “tree frog,” constantly hopping around, while Ahn Cheol-soo is a “goat,” prone to sulking and breaking away from his party. Moon Jae-in is characterized as an “ox,” diligently working but ultimately exploited and discarded. The absence of such powerful and auspicious physiognomies among current politicians highlights a critical void in leadership.

14. The Economic Blueprint for National Revival: Debt Eradication and Educational Reform
    Huh Kyung-young’s economic plan for national revival includes eradicating household debt and reforming education. He proposes that upon becoming president, he would swiftly eliminate household debt, starting with those who have loans under 500 million won. This would be achieved by selling off state-owned enterprises, real estate, and unused land. The government would also cover interest payments for remaining debts. This would free up citizens’ income, stimulating the economy as they spend on necessities. Educational reforms include reducing the college entrance exam to a single subject and abolishing the current university admissions system. Instead, students’ cumulative scores in a chosen field over six years would determine their university placement. This would eliminate the need for private tutoring and cram schools, redirecting those funds into the economy and improving the quality of life for families.

15. The Karmic Repercussions of Filial Impiety: Park Geun-hye’s Legacy
    The concept of “Banpojihyo,” or filial piety, is deeply ingrained in Korean culture. It refers to the devotion shown by a child to their parents, even after their passing. While crows are said to exhibit this by feeding their elderly parents, humans are capable of “Daehyo,” or great filial piety, which involves bringing honor to one’s family name through achievement. President Park Geun-hye, by becoming president on the strength of her father’s legacy, yet subsequently bringing shame upon her parents’ names, has acted contrary to “Banpojihyo.” This is seen as a significant transgression, leading to karmic repercussions, such as the fire at her father’s birthplace and the Seo-mun Market. Despite her resilience, such events are considered deeply problematic.

16. The Dangers of Emotional Responses and the Manipulation of Public Opinion
    Emotional responses to national issues, such as the Choi Soon-sil scandal, can be detrimental. The public’s tendency to focus on the faults of others, rather than self-reflection, exacerbates problems. The media’s sensationalized reporting, akin to “adding frost to snow,” can mislead the public, as seen in the controversy surrounding US beef imports. False narratives, such as the claim that US beef causes brain damage, can incite widespread panic and protests, leading to economic damage. It is crucial for the media to report truthfully and for the public to exercise critical thinking, rather than being swayed by emotional appeals.

17. The Lack of Global Perspective in Korean Journalism and the Importance of Macroeconomic Vision
    Korean journalists often exhibit a “microscopic” rather than “macroscopic” perspective, focusing on sensational domestic scandals while lacking a global mindset. This was evident when former US President Barack Obama sought questions from Korean journalists, who remained silent, forcing a Chinese journalist to step in. This highlights a deficiency in international awareness and critical thinking among Korean media. While they excel at uncovering domestic scandals, they fail to engage with broader global issues. This narrow focus on the Choi Soon-sil affair, while ignoring the far greater corruption of past administrations, demonstrates a lack of “macroeconomic vision.” Past presidents and their families engaged in corruption on a massive scale, yet the public’s outrage is disproportionately directed at a friend of the president. While acknowledging the wrongdoing, it is important to recognize that the president may not have been fully aware of her friend’s actions, having focused on managing her own family.

18. The Call for Truth and the Integrity of Leadership
    It is imperative to speak the truth, even when it is unpopular. Despite facing public criticism, Huh Kyung-young maintains his stance, emphasizing the importance of honesty and integrity in leadership.

19. The Heroism of Ordinary Women and the Failure of Male Leadership
    The heroism of ordinary women, such as flight attendant Park Ji-young and teacher Choi Hye-jung, during the Sewol ferry disaster, stands in stark contrast to the cowardice of male crew members who abandoned the sinking ship. Park Ji-young sacrificed her life to save students, a selfless act recognized by former US President Barack Obama, who awarded her a gold medal and issued a commemorative stamp. In contrast, Korea failed to adequately honor these heroines. This highlights a societal issue where male-dominated structures often lead to failure, reinforcing the idea that a woman’s leadership, when respected, can bring prosperity. The public’s emotional condemnation of President Park Geun-hye, a woman, for the actions of one individual, is seen as a misguided attempt to destroy the nation.

20. The Symbolic Flaws of National Emblems and the Need for Spiritual Governance
    The national symbols of Korea, including the Taegeukgi and the name of the presidential residence, Cheong Wa Dae (Blue House), are deemed flawed and indicative of national misfortune. The “Blue House” is associated with “blue collar” workers or prisoners, contrasting with the “White House” of the wealthy. The Taegeukgi, with its incorrect trigram arrangement, is believed to bring division and bad luck. Huh Kyung-young proposes renaming the presidential residence to “Haneulgung” (Heavenly Palace), symbolizing a spiritual and unified nation. This shift from flawed symbolism to a spiritually aligned governance is crucial for the nation’s future.

21. Honoring Heroes and Learning from Tragedy: The Legacy of Sewol
    The heroism of individuals like Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung during the Sewol ferry disaster must not be forgotten. Their stories should be incorporated into educational curricula, and their families should receive pensions. Commemorative books should be created to immortalize their acts of courage. The Sewol tragedy serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of selflessness and the need to honor those who make ultimate sacrifices.

22. Macroeconomic Challenges and the Failure of Political Leadership
    Korea faces significant macroeconomic challenges, including a 1,500 trillion won household debt, exacerbated by rising interest rates and tightened loan restrictions. This economic burden forces citizens to prioritize debt repayment over consumption, stifling economic growth. The current political leadership has failed to address these issues effectively, leading to public frustration that often manifests in protests, such as those related to the Choi Soon-sil scandal. The government’s inability to implement necessary structural reforms, such as restructuring ailing shipping companies, further highlights its shortcomings.

23. The Perils of Expedited Processes and the Erosion of Public Trust
    The expedited dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the rapid establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, driven by state intervention, eroded public trust. While the government may have had good intentions, the lack of due process and transparency in these actions fueled public anger. The speed at which these entities were created, compared to the lengthy process for citizen-initiated foundations, raised suspicions of impropriety. The absence of proper meeting records and the perception of unilateral decision-making further alienated the public. While no direct embezzlement was proven, the flawed “process” (yeonhyeok) rather than the “result” (gwi-nap) became the focal point of public discontent.

24. The Cycle of Retribution and the Primacy of Spiritual Vision
    The political landscape is often characterized by a cycle of retribution. President Park Geun-hye’s perceived retaliation against Lee Jung-hee, who challenged her during a TV debate, ultimately led to her own downfall. This illustrates the principle of “cause and effect.” Emotional responses in politics are detrimental; instead, decisions should be guided by reason and, more importantly, by “spiritual vision.” Spiritual vision allows one to foresee future events, such as President Park’s eventual departure from office or Trump’s unlikely rise to power. Such foresight is absent among current political leaders, leaving the nation vulnerable.

25. The Dire State of the Nation and the Need for a Visionary Leader
    The nation faces a dire future without a spiritually enlightened leader. The current political climate, marked by corruption and economic instability, threatens to dismantle the country. Previous administrations have plundered national resources, leaving state-owned banks in disarray and national debt soaring. President Park Geun-hye, upon realizing the extent of this corruption, was compelled to initiate cultural enrichment projects as a desperate measure to stimulate the economy, as businesses were reluctant to invest in Korea. Her emotional response to this overwhelming reality, rather than a calculated strategy, led to further complications.

26. The Three Pillars of Filial Piety and the President’s Failure to Uphold Them
    Filial piety encompasses three key elements: “Muljilhyo” (material devotion), “Simhyo” (heartfelt devotion), and “Daehyo” (great devotion). While material and heartfelt devotion are common, “Daehyo” involves bringing honor to one’s family name through significant achievements. President Park Geun-hye, despite her presidential office, is seen as having failed in “Daehyo” by bringing shame upon her parents’ legacy. Furthermore, filial piety extends to “Saengjeonjihyo” (devotion during life) and “Sahujihyo” (devotion after death). “Sahujihyo” requires children to remember their parents’ virtues and sacrifices, exercising prudence in their own lives. President Park’s inability to maintain harmonious relationships with her siblings and her perceived isolation from her family further fueled public suspicion and resentment.

27. The Importance of Process and the Dangers of Abusing Power
    The “process” (yeonhyeok) by which decisions are made is as crucial as the outcome. The expedited dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the rapid establishment of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, lacking proper procedures, undermined public trust. Leaders must avoid abusing their power to suppress dissent or favor certain individuals. Instead, credit for positive outcomes should be attributed to others, while responsibility for negative outcomes should be accepted personally. Failure to adhere to this principle invites judgment.

28. The Wisdom of Guan Zhong and the Trust Placed in Choi Soon-sil
    The historical anecdote of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya illustrates the importance of choosing capable individuals, even if they have flaws. Bao Shuya recommended Guan Zhong, a former criminal, to Duke Huan of Qi, prioritizing his ability to govern over his past transgressions. This parallels President Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil, despite her questionable background. While the Chinese anecdote suggests a positive outcome, the Korean proverb “the trusted axe cuts the foot” implies a betrayal of trust.

29. The Public’s Disillusionment with Traditional Politics and the Emergence of a New Hope
    The public is increasingly disillusioned with traditional politicians, expressing a desire for a new kind of leadership. This sentiment is echoed by a philosophy professor from the US, who initially came to support Ban Ki-moon but realized he was not suitable for Korea. The professor, David Jung, after researching Huh Kyung-young, concluded that he is the leader the era demands. He notes Huh Kyung-young’s ability to deliver over a thousand lectures without notes, covering a vast range of subjects, a feat unmatched by other academics.

30. The Courage to Confront Corruption and the Demand for Self-Sacrificing Leadership
    Addressing deep-seated corruption, such as the Yulgok Bill scandal in the defense industry, requires immense courage. Any leader attempting to dismantle such entrenched systems risks assassination or imprisonment. The era demands a leader willing to sacrifice their life for the nation. While many politicians claim to want to save the country, few are truly prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice. This realization led Professor Jung to change his mind, concluding that only a leader with such unwavering commitment can navigate Korea’s complex challenges.

31. The Prophetic Voice of Huh Kyung-young and the Disconnect of Traditional Media
    Huh Kyung-young’s profound wisdom and comprehensive understanding of domestic and international issues are unparalleled among Korean politicians. His insights, as acknowledged by figures like Lee Jae-myung, who considers him the most respected person in Korea, highlight the inadequacy of other presidential candidates. Their understanding is merely a fraction of Huh Kyung-young’s. This recognition extends to the Korean diaspora, who actively promote his vision.

32. The Media’s Recognition of Huh Kyung-young’s Influence and the Prediction of a “Korean Trump”
    Mainstream media, including the International Newspaper and Korea Daily, have begun to acknowledge Huh Kyung-young’s growing influence. Min Byung-doo, a strategist for the Democratic Party, suggested that if Korea’s economy continues to decline, a figure like Huh Kyung-young, with bold policies, could emerge as a “Korean Trump.” This indicates a growing recognition of his unique appeal and the public’s desire for unconventional leadership.

33. The Prescience of Trump’s Victory and the Need for a Spiritually Guided Leader
    Huh Kyung-young’s prediction of Donald Trump’s presidency, made in 2015 when Trump was a long-shot candidate, demonstrates his extraordinary foresight. He recognized Trump’s potential through spiritual vision, despite widespread skepticism. He also warned that a Hillary Clinton presidency would lead to war on the Korean Peninsula. This ability to foresee global events underscores the critical need for a leader with spiritual insight, which is currently lacking among Korean politicians. Without such a leader, the nation risks further decline and exploitation.

34. The Prophecy of the 19th President and the Public’s Disbelief
    Online communities have circulated prophecies regarding the 19th president, with some attributing them to a “diviner” who accurately predicted events like President Park Chung-hee’s assassination, President Roh Moo-hyun’s election and death, and Trump’s victory. This “diviner” predicted that none of the currently discussed candidates would become president, and that a “maverick” figure, like Trump, would emerge as the leader. This prophecy explicitly names Huh Kyung-young as the future president, causing shock and disbelief among netizens. While some dismiss it as rumor, others express fear, acknowledging that previously unthinkable events have become reality in Korea. The underlying message is the profound lack of satisfactory leaders, leading to such unconventional prophecies.

35. The Call for a Fair Election and the Decision to Run for President
    Huh Kyung-young expresses his disinterest in seizing power through unconventional means, preferring to participate in a fair presidential election in December. He emphasizes the importance of a legitimate electoral process. Despite the media’s overwhelming support for Hillary Clinton, with 93% of Koreans favoring her, Huh Kyung-young asserted that he alone could prevent a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula. He claims to have influenced Trump’s presidency and, despite the “shame” of dealing with petty domestic politics, he will run for president in the upcoming election.

36. The Healing Power of Huh Kyung-young’s Energy and the Rejection of Traditional Religion
    Huh Kyung-young possesses a unique “cosmic energy” that distinguishes him from ordinary humans. Simply invoking his name can alleviate illness, and his direct presence can heal. This power is not limited to physical proximity; even viewing his image on a phone can bring healing. He rejects the need for traditional religions, stating that his name alone is sufficient for spiritual and physical well-being. He encourages people to call his name, regardless of their religious affiliation, as it leads to improved health and extended lifespan.

37. The Diagnostic and Healing Abilities of Huh Kyung-young
    Huh Kyung-young demonstrates extraordinary diagnostic and healing abilities. By simply touching a person’s hand, he can detect underlying health issues, such as cancer or other ailments. He can instantly restore strength and heal various conditions, including thyroid problems, bronchial issues, and even prevent strokes. This instantaneous healing, which he attributes to his unique energy, is unlike any medical practice in the world. He emphasizes that this is not hypnosis but a genuine manifestation of his inherent power, a gift to humanity.

38. The Universal Healing and Transformation
    Huh Kyung-young’s healing power extends universally, addressing various ailments from breast cancer to joint pain. He asserts that simply looking at him or calling his name can bring about complete healing and transformation. This profound ability, he states, is a blessing for all who encounter him.

The Prophetic Vision of Huh Kyung-young: Unveiling the Future of Humanity and Governance

1. The Divergent Paths of Life and the Essence of Spiritual Insight
   Huh Kyung-young begins by addressing the audience, acknowledging their presence as a significant choice, contrasting it with those who might be engaged in protests or other activities . He draws an analogy of two individuals starting from the same point, much like students in university or soldiers entering service, who appear similar initially . However, as time progresses, their paths diverge dramatically, leading one to success and the other to failure . This divergence, he asserts, is determined by the choices made, such as attending his lecture versus participating in a demonstration . He emphasizes that while immediate benefits may not be apparent, the long-term rewards of seeking knowledge are immense, akin to the exponential growth seen in dedicated study . He cautions against distractions that can derail one’s life path, particularly during youth, highlighting how a single misstep can alter one’s entire destiny .

Transitioning to a complex analogy involving the human body’s organs, Huh Kyung-young describes the circulatory system, where the heart (심장) pumps blood to the liver (간), lungs (폐), and kidneys (신장), eventually returning to the heart . He notes that some individuals metaphorically reverse this natural order, leading to detrimental outcomes . The ultimate purpose of this circulation, he explains, is to produce “essence” (정), which is pure energy . He stresses the critical role of the stomach (위장) in processing food and blood to generate this fundamental energy, distinguishing it from the heart, which merely circulates blood . This intricate biological process serves as a metaphor for life’s choices: just as the body’s systems must function correctly for vitality, individuals must choose the right path for their well-being . He then claims to have foreseen significant political events, such as the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and the candlelight vigils four years prior, and Donald Trump’s election one year and two months in advance . He clarifies that these are not mere predictions but insights derived from “spirituality” (영성), which differs from ordinary foresight .

2. The Vision for a Unified World and Electoral Transformation
   Huh Kyung-young articulates his vision for becoming president and unifying the world, outlining a unique electoral strategy . He projects that out of approximately 36 million voters in South Korea, 90% will participate in the election, and he will secure 90% of those votes . He acknowledges that initial public opinion polls might show him with a mere 0.1% support, similar to Trump’s early standing . However, he anticipates a rapid surge in support, progressing from 10% to 30%, then to 50% as the election campaign advances . His key promise, to be unveiled during a televised debate, is a monthly dividend of 1.5 million Korean Won (원) to every citizen over 20 years old, ensuring financial security and elevating all Koreans to the middle class . He asserts that once people witness his resolve to implement this policy, they will unequivocally trust him to fulfill his promises .

He further explains that funds for these dividends would come from selling off underutilized state-owned properties and buildings, even if it means “stealing from Japan or America” or liquidating national assets . He contends that such a commitment would garner 90% of the vote, transcending traditional party loyalties . He argues that if he is not elected, citizens would lose out on substantial financial benefits, contrasting this with the current political landscape where politicians are perceived as siphoning off national wealth . He highlights the irony of South Korea’s high Gross National Product (GNP) while its citizens struggle financially . He connects the current political climate, specifically the Choi Soon-sil (최순실) and Chung Yoo-ra (정유라) scandal, to an anticipated increase in voter turnout among young people . He claims that young people, who previously only voted during the Roh Moo-hyun (노무현) era, will now recognize the necessity of voting for him . He proposes lowering the voting age to 14, arguing that early participation in elections is crucial for learning democracy . He suggests that not voting would result in academic penalties, thereby incentivizing both students and their parents to participate . He believes that empowering young voters would lead to the abolition of private tutoring and college entrance exams, redirecting educational expenses into the economy .

3. The Symbolic Flaws of the National Flag and the Importance of Female Leadership
   Huh Kyung-young delves into the symbolic flaws of the South Korean national flag, the Taegeukgi (태극기), and its connection to national misfortune . He explains that the current arrangement of the trigrams (괘) in the Taegeukgi, with the male principle (건) at the top and the female principle (곤) at the bottom, represents the “Heaven and Earth Obstruction Hexagram” (천지비괘) in the I Ching (주역) . This hexagram, he asserts, symbolizes “ruin” (패망) and “disaster” (망조), leading to discord and conflict, much like marital strife . He argues that this configuration fosters division, even contributing to the historical conflict between North and South Korea .

He proposes reversing the positions of the trigrams, placing the female principle (음) above the male principle (양), which would correspond to the “Earth and Heaven Peace Hexagram” (지천태괘) . This arrangement, he explains, signifies an era of “great peace” (태평시대) and harmony, where the energies of heaven and earth interact constructively, leading to prosperity and the flourishing of offspring . He criticizes the current societal structure, where men hold excessive authority, leading to familial discord and national decline . He emphasizes the importance of respecting women, citing historical examples where households prospered when women were empowered, such as being entrusted with the keys to the storeroom . He extends this to royal courts, where queens, despite the king’s apparent power, often held significant influence over daily affairs and even the king’s fate . He concludes that the downfall of the Joseon Dynasty (조선) was partly due to kings having multiple concubines (후궁), which led to internal strife and disrespect for women . He claims to have mastered the I Ching (주역) before elementary school, giving him a profound understanding of natural laws and preventing him from making detrimental choices . He further criticizes the Taegeukgi (태극기) for being hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, without proper understanding of the I Ching (주역), leading to its inauspicious design . He also points out that the term “Taegeuk” (태극) itself is problematic, contrasting it with Japan’s “Mugeuk” (무극) flag, which he considers superior as it represents the entire universe . He suggests that the Taegeukgi (태극기) was intentionally designed by the Japanese to bring misfortune to Korea .

4. The Principle of Compassion and the Critique of Societal Judgment
   Huh Kyung-young advocates for a more compassionate approach, particularly towards women, in the context of national events . He suggests that while wrongdoing should not be condoned, society should exercise greater leniency when women commit offenses, contrasting this with the intense public outrage directed at President Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil (최순실) . He recounts a past prediction he made about Park Geun-hye’s political future, made shortly after her election, indicating that her presidency would face challenges . He attributes these predictions not merely to traditional fortune-telling (사주) but to his “spiritual” (영적) insight .

He analyzes Park Geun-hye’s birth chart (사주), noting that her birth year (신묘생) clashed with the year 2016 (병신년) due to a “원진살” (원진살), a negative astrological influence, predicting difficulties for her around that time . He interprets this as a period of potential national crisis, even suggesting the possibility of war . He cautions against excessive public demonstrations, arguing that such actions could inadvertently aid North Korea and lead to miscalculations . He draws a parallel to the fall of Vietnam, where key figures were revealed to be spies, suggesting that similar dangers could lurk within public protests . He emphasizes that while individuals make mistakes, these should not escalate into national ruin, especially when legal mechanisms exist to address wrongdoing . He asserts that Park Geun-hye’s constitutional violations are questionable, arguing that a president possesses broad economic and emergency powers, including the ability to issue urgent financial decrees or even change currency . He contends that consulting close confidantes on such matters, rather than official channels, is a legitimate exercise of presidential authority to prevent leaks . He criticizes the public’s perception that such actions constitute constitutional breaches, highlighting the president’s extensive powers, including the right to pardon . He argues that the focus should be on punishing individuals like Choi Soon-sil (최순실) rather than blaming the president for exercising her legitimate powers .

5. The Perils of Misguided Leadership and the Call for Spiritual Governance
   Huh Kyung-young critiques past male presidents for accumulating massive household debt (가계부채) totaling 1,500 trillion Korean Won (원), contrasting this with Park Geun-hye’s perceived integrity regarding national funds . He suggests that while previous administrations saw family members exploit their positions for personal gain, Park Geun-hye’s situation involved a long-time friend, which he views as a different kind of oversight . He expresses sympathy for former President Lee Myung-bak (이명박) and his brother, acknowledging their difficult upbringing and entrepreneurial spirit, but still points to the astronomical sums of money allegedly misappropriated by those around past presidents . He contrasts this with the public’s intense focus on Choi Soon-sil’s (최순실) influence, which he considers a disproportionate reaction .

He asserts that if Park Geun-hye were to step down immediately, there is no current political figure in South Korea, among either ruling or opposition parties, who possesses the necessary leadership qualities, specifically a “Blue Dragon” (청룡상) or “Yellow Dragon” (황룡상) aura . He dismisses other potential candidates with animal analogies: Ban Ki-moon (반기문) as a “tree frog” (청개구리 상), Ahn Cheol-soo (안철수) as a “goat” (염소 상) prone to sulking, and Moon Jae-in (문재인) as an “ox” (소) destined for exploitation . He cites Seongnam (성남) Mayor Lee Jae-myung (이재명), whom he describes as having “rat eyes” (쥐새끼 눈) and an “immugi” (이무기장) aura, as someone who respects him and acknowledges his assertion that the nation’s problem is not a lack of money but an abundance of “thieves” (도둑놈) . He proposes to eliminate 50% of the national budget and distribute it to citizens, along with a plan to resolve the 1,300 trillion Korean Won (원) household debt . His solution involves the government repaying loans under 500 million Korean Won (원) by selling state-owned enterprises and real estate, thereby revitalizing the economy . He also suggests eliminating college entrance exams and private tutoring, redirecting those funds into the economy . He reiterates his prediction that Park Geun-hye’s downfall is linked to her birth year and her father, Park Chung-hee’s (박정희) birth year, both associated with the “monkey” (원숭이) zodiac sign, leading to symbolic misfortunes like fires at Park Chung-hee’s birthplace and Seomun Market (서문시장) . He views these events as a “black hole” (블랙홀) for her parents’ legacy .

6. The Call for a New National Identity and Spiritual Leadership
   Huh Kyung-young criticizes the current state of South Korean media and public discourse, particularly their focus on sensationalism rather than broader issues . He recounts an incident where former U.S. President Barack Obama (오바마) sought questions from Korean journalists, but none came forward, leading a Chinese journalist to step in . He interprets this as a lack of “global mindset” (글로벌 마인드) or “macroscopic perspective” (거시적인 안목) among Korean media, who are instead preoccupied with “microscopic” (미시적인 안목) issues like the Choi Soon-sil (최순실) scandal . He argues that while past administrations had their share of corruption involving family members, the public’s outrage over a friend’s involvement with Park Geun-hye is disproportionate . He asserts that Park Geun-hye did not intentionally violate the constitution or direct her friend to embezzle funds, but rather failed to manage her personal relationships effectively .

He praises Obama (오바마) for honoring the female crew member, Park Ji-young (박지영), and teacher, Choi Hye-jung (최혜정), who sacrificed their lives during the Sewol (세월호) ferry disaster, awarding them gold medals and issuing commemorative stamps . He contrasts this with the lack of recognition from the South Korean government, using it to reinforce his argument that a male-dominated society leads to misfortune . He criticizes the name of the presidential residence, Cheong Wa Dae (청와대), meaning “Blue House” (푸른 기와집), arguing that “blue collar” (블루 칼라) is associated with prisoners or laborers, while “white collar” (화이트 칼라) signifies wealth . He proposes renaming it “Haneulgung” (하늘궁), meaning “Heavenly Palace” (하늘궁), to reflect a more auspicious national identity . He emphasizes the importance of remembering the Sewol (세월호) tragedy and honoring the heroes, advocating for their stories to be included in textbooks and their families to receive pensions . He discusses economic theories, contrasting “macroeconomics” (거시 경제) with “microeconomics” (미시 경제), and criticizes the current government’s handling of household debt and interest rate hikes, which he believes are stifling the economy . He suggests that many participants in the candlelight vigils are driven by economic hardship rather than solely the Choi Soon-sil (최순실) scandal . He also criticizes the government’s swift dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (통진당) and the rapid establishment of the Mir (미르) and K-Sports (케이스포츠) foundations, contrasting this with the slow pace of public petitions . He argues that while no direct theft occurred, the lack of proper procedure and transparency in these actions fueled public anger .

7. The Essence of Filial Piety and the Path to True Leadership
   Huh Kyung-young elaborates on the concept of “filial piety” (효도), distinguishing between different forms and their implications for leadership . He introduces “Banpojihyo” (반포지효), the filial piety of crows, where young crows feed their elderly parents, symbolizing material and emotional support . However, he notes that crows cannot achieve “Daehyo” (대효), which means bringing honor to one’s family name through great achievements . He contrasts this with Park Geun-hye, who, despite becoming president, brought “shame” (망신) to her parents’ legacy, thus failing to achieve Daehyo (대효) . He outlines three types of filial piety for humans: “Saengjonjihyo” (생존지효), showing respect while parents are alive; “Sahujihyo” (사후지효), honoring them after their passing; and “Simhyo” (심효), marrying and having grandchildren . He advises choosing a spouse who pleases one’s mother, not just oneself, as a sign of true filial piety .

He emphasizes that Sahujihyo (사후지효) involves always remembering and emulating the virtues of one’s parents, such as their frugality and resilience . He criticizes Park Geun-hye for failing to uphold this, leading to the desecration of her parents’ graves and birthplace . He recounts witnessing an elderly man attempting to dig up Park Chung-hee’s (박정희) grave, highlighting the extreme disrespect that can arise when a leader fails to honor their heritage . He stresses that true filial piety involves constant self-reflection and modesty, even when one achieves success . He also points out that Park Geun-hye’s estrangement from her siblings, particularly during holidays, fueled public suspicion and resentment, suggesting the influence of Choi Tae-min (최태민) . He urges the public to transcend emotional reactions and view national issues through a “spiritual” (영성) lens, focusing on the future of the Korean people . He reiterates his criticism of the government’s hasty actions, such as the dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party (통진당) and the creation of the Mir (미르) and K-Sports (케이스포츠) foundations, which he deems incomprehensible to the public . He concludes by advocating for a principle of self-responsibility: attributing good outcomes to others or to heaven, and taking personal responsibility for negative experiences . He then references the historical friendship of Guan Zhong (관중) and Bao Shuya (포숙아), where Bao Shuya (포숙아) recommended Guan Zhong (관중) to the king despite his past transgressions, prioritizing the nation’s welfare over personal morality . He draws a parallel to Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil (최순실), suggesting that while trust is important, it can lead to betrayal .

8. The Emergence of a New Era and the Demand for Unconventional Leadership
   A philosophy professor from the United States, David Jung (정형순), expresses his observations on the tumultuous political situation in South Korea . He initially came to support Ban Ki-moon (반기문) for the presidency but realized upon arriving in Korea that Ban Ki-moon (반기문) was not suitable for the country’s specific needs, despite his international experience . He notes the rising popularity of Seongnam (성남) Mayor Lee Jae-myung (이재명) and his own efforts to connect with various political figures . However, his research led him to Huh Kyung-young, whom he recognized as a figure uniquely suited to the current era . He praises Huh Kyung-young’s extensive lecture series, noting that few, if any, academics could deliver over a thousand lectures without notes, especially across such a wide range of subjects . He draws a comparison to Napoleon (나폴레옹), suggesting that great leaders are often shaped by the demands of their time, regardless of their physical appearance . He states that Huh Kyung-young’s prophecies, made 25 years prior, are now becoming relevant .

He highlights the issue of the Yulgok (율곡) Project, a defense industry scandal, which he believes no conventional politician can resolve . He explains that any leader attempting to tackle such deep-seated corruption would face severe consequences, including assassination or imprisonment, unless they are prepared to sacrifice their life . He concludes that the current era demands a leader with an unwavering commitment, even to the point of death, to save the nation . He expresses his change of heart, realizing that South Korea requires an extraordinary leader . A commentator then reads a YouTube comment praising Huh Kyung-young’s wisdom and comprehensive understanding of domestic and international issues, asserting that no other politician in South Korea possesses such insight . The commenter, having met various presidential candidates, including Lee Jae-myung (이재명), finds them to be significantly less capable than Huh Kyung-young . The comment also mentions Lee Jae-myung’s (이재명) respect for Huh Kyung-young’s (허경영) assertion that the nation’s problem is not a lack of money but an abundance of “thieves” (도둑놈) .

9. The Prophetic Voice and the Imperative for Spiritual Governance
   Huh Kyung-young’s influence is further highlighted by media reports, including an article from the International Newspaper (국제신문) titled “Will a Korean Trump Emerge Next Year?” . The article quotes Min Byung-doo (민병두), a strategist for the Democratic Party of Korea (더불어민주당), who suggests that if the economy continues to worsen, a figure like Huh Kyung-young, with bold policies, might be necessary to move the electorate . Other newspapers, such as Korea Daily (코리아데일리), also feature articles about Huh Kyung-young, with some commentators even suggesting that the Saenuri Party (새누리당) should recruit him . He then refers to a 2015 MBN broadcast where he predicted Donald Trump’s presidency, even when Trump was considered a long-shot candidate . He asserts that his ability to recognize a “presidential aura” (대통령 상) in Trump, despite his low polling numbers, stems from his “spiritual” (영적인 눈) insight .

He warns that if Park Geun-hye steps down prematurely, a less capable leader could ascend to power, leading to national ruin and the subjugation of Korean youth . He claims that past presidents have left the nation with a fragile economy, burdened by debt and struggling industries, which he understands as the context for Park Geun-hye’s initiatives like the “Cultural Enrichment Project” (문화융성 사업) . He cites an online article that discusses a “diviner” (역술인) who predicted various political events, including the assassinations of presidents, the deaths of leaders, and Trump’s election, and who also predicted that Huh Kyung-young would become the 19th president . The article notes the public’s mixed reactions, from disbelief to fear, acknowledging that previously unthinkable events have become reality . He emphasizes that he does not wish to gain power by undermining others but prefers to run in a fair election . He references a Maeil Business Newspaper (매일경제) report from October 2016, which stated that 93% of Koreans supported Hillary Clinton for the U.S. presidency . He asserts that only he possesses the insight to choose a U.S. president who can prevent nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula . He concludes by stating that he, who influenced Trump’s presidency, is destined to unify the world, and he will run for president next year .

10. The Manifestation of Spiritual Energy and Healing
    Huh Kyung-young demonstrates his unique spiritual abilities, beginning with a physical test involving audience members . He asks individuals to mentally choose between himself, Jesus, or Buddha, and then attempts to push their arm down . He claims that only when his name is chosen, or when his photograph is viewed, does the arm remain strong and unmovable, while it weakens for the other names . He asserts that merely invoking his name can improve one’s health, and direct interaction with him can lead to healing . He clarifies that he is not born of human conception but possesses a different energy from ordinary people . He expresses his dislike for religious “practices” (종교 행위) but respects all religions and their leaders . He states that simply calling his name is sufficient . He claims that calling his name before sleep can reverse the aging process, extending one’s lifespan .

He then performs a diagnostic and healing demonstration, using his hand as a “stethoscope” (청진기) to detect ailments . He claims that his hand will automatically drop when it passes over an area with cancer . He identifies various health issues in an audience member, including problems with the thyroid (갑상선) and bronchi (기관지), and even signs of a potential stroke (뇌졸증) . He then performs a healing act, declaring that the individual is “cured” (고쳤다) . He re-tests the individual’s strength and finds that the previously weak areas are now strong . He states that merely looking at his image, even through a phone, can bring healing, emphasizing that such a doctor does not exist anywhere else in the world . He reiterates that he is the embodiment of a spiritual force that has come to Earth in human form, and that those who encounter him are “blessed” (복 받은 거지) . He concludes by stating that he does not need to establish a religion and does not require money, only that people call his name . He performs similar healing acts on other audience members, claiming to cure various ailments, including breast cancer (유방암) and joint problems (관절) .

20161203_Sat_Lecture1055_Prophecy_The Era of Huh Kyung young

Date: 2016.12.03

Keywords: Huh Kyung young, Prophecy, Korean Politics, Spiritual Insight, National Transformation

Content

The Divergent Paths of Life and the Significance of Spiritual Guidance
Welcome, everyone. For those attending for the first time, it is a pleasure to have you. Those who have chosen to come here today, rather than participating in demonstrations, are indeed fortunate. Just a short distance from here lies a different path, yet you have chosen this one, which is truly remarkable. In our youth, we often perceive paths as leading to either success or failure. At the starting point, two individuals may embark on their journeys, appearing similar whether in university or military service, much like the child of a wealthy family and an ordinary student. However, as time progresses, their paths diverge significantly, making it impossible for one to perceive the other’s trajectory. One may completely forget the other, despite having started from the same line with similar family backgrounds. The critical juncture lies in whether one chooses to participate in a demonstration or to attend a lecture by Huh Kyung young. This choice fundamentally alters the course of one’s life. While meeting me may not offer immediate material gain, it promises immense future benefits. This is akin to students neglecting their studies in their youth because there is no immediate profit. Yet, diligent study leads to exponential growth. Conversely, a student diligently preparing for an examination or learning a trade at a vocational college can be swayed by external influences, leading to ruin. Initially, the consequences are not apparent. Therefore, a misstep in one’s youth can entirely alter the trajectory of life.

Consider the analogy of the human organs: the spleen and stomach represent the central earth element. The heart circulates blood, which then goes to the liver and lungs. The lungs filter the blood, which then proceeds to the kidneys. The heart oxygenates and filters the blood, which then returns to the liver and eventually to the heart. This circulatory path is vital, yet some individuals metaphorically reverse this flow. If the blood were to circulate in reverse—from the heart to the liver, then to the kidneys, then to the lungs for oxygenation, and finally back to the heart—it would be detrimental. Ultimately, where does this blood perform its work? The stomach also requires blood. The spleen and stomach need blood, and this process ultimately produces essence, which is energy. While blood circulation is essential, if the stomach ceases to function due to lack of food and blood, everything comes to an end. The stomach fundamentally produces energy. The heart merely circulates blood; it does not produce energy. The heart generates pathways. Similarly, if on a Saturday, one person goes out to play, another to a demonstration, and a third to hear Huh Kyung young, it is clear who will ultimately prosper. You understand this, which is why you are here, while those elsewhere remain unaware. Today’s lecture will be beneficial.

Prophecies and Spiritual Insight: Beyond Conventional Prediction
Today’s lecture addresses the current era, specifically regarding President Park Geun-hye. I spoke of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years ago. I also predicted Donald Trump’s election one year and two months prior. These were not mere predictions by a fortune-teller; they were insights derived from spiritual vision, which differs from ordinary perception. However, such insights should not be widely publicized. I only speak of President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment now because it has become a reality. I spoke of these things in the past but did not publicize them. One should not openly declare that Trump will win. Until Trump’s election, it was a secret. Until then, one should say that the outcome is unknown. However, I had already stated it on television. I also said that if Hillary Clinton were elected, war would break out in Korea.

The Vision of a Unified World and National Transformation
I will become president and unify the world. What does this mean? Approximately 36 million out of 50 million citizens vote. Of these eligible voters, 90% will participate in the election. And of those who vote, I will be elected with 90% of the votes. Initially, in opinion polls, I might register 0.1%, like Trump. Then, in the early stages of the election, it might rise to 10%, then 30%, and eventually 50%. When I appear on television for a debate and declare that I will provide a monthly dividend of 1.5 million won to every citizen over 20 years old, directly deposited into their bank accounts, no one will worry about money. All Koreans will become middle class. When I promise to fulfill this, those who see my face will undoubtedly vote for me, believing I will keep my promise. I will secure the funds, even if it means selling off unnecessary state-owned land, buildings, or other national assets. When people trust that I will do this, the voter turnout will reach 90%, and I will be elected. Votes that were previously split between parties will converge. If I am not elected, people will lose 2 billion won per family member, or 8 billion won for a family of four, over their lifetime. If I am not elected, politicians will continue to siphon off money. We are struggling to support politicians, with our GNP nearing $30,000, while citizens are barely surviving on $3,000, paying interest. Therefore, 90% will vote.

The recent events involving President Park Geun-hye will motivate young people to vote, particularly due to the Choi Soon-sil and Chung Yoo-ra scandals. Young people will vote in large numbers. In the past, young people only voted during the Roh Moo-hyun era; otherwise, they would go out and play. But now, with Huh Kyung young running for president, young people have realized the necessity of voting. The era of revolution by force or military coups has passed. Now, it is solely through the votes of young people. When I become president, I will allow 14-year-olds to vote. This is because middle school students need to learn democracy by holding their parents’ hands and going to the polls. If a middle school student does not vote, it will result in a minus on their academic record. Those without a voting record will not be able to attend university. Missing even one vote will result in significant disadvantages in their future careers. This will compel parents to take their children to vote, increasing parental turnout. The state recognizes that 14-year-olds today are brighter than 24-year-olds of the past. Denying them voting rights confines them to schools, concrete buildings, and cram schools until midnight, preventing them from experiencing true education. If children are given the right to vote at 14, they will vote for candidates who abolish private tutoring and the college entrance exam. Once they experience voting, they will understand democracy and see their parents exercising their sovereignty. This will change their perception of democracy. Thus, voter turnout will reach 90%. Even if there are ten candidates, Huh Kyung young will secure 90% of the votes.

Upon becoming president, it will not be merely for the citizens of South Korea. A state of emergency will be declared, all existing National Assembly members will be dismissed, and 100 new members will be elected to establish a strong governing system. Otherwise, with 300 National Assembly members, it would be impossible to implement my pledges, such as the citizen dividend. Would the people approve of such a system? We will not be dragged around by National Assembly members like President Park Geun-hye, leading to impeachment. I will be reborn as a powerful president, and our nation will achieve world unification. This is today’s message.

The Importance of Integrity and the Misguided Nature of Current Politics
I recall a recent news story about someone who lost 13 million won in cash on the street. A young person found the envelope containing exactly 13 million won and reported it to the police. The owner recovered the money and appeared on television. The owner then added 37 million won to the recovered sum, donating a total of 50 million won to charity. The owner, a businessperson, was deeply moved by the young person’s honesty, especially given the many struggling people in Korea. This act of finding and returning the money, then adding to it for donation, was widely reported on television. The person was profoundly touched by recovering their lost wealth. This act of generosity, adding 37 million won to the 13 million, totaling 50 million won, was donated to social service organizations and disadvantaged groups. This was a commendable act.

Years ago, I had a similar experience. About seven or eight years ago, I was driving through a neighborhood when I saw a moving truck from which an envelope containing 76 million won fell onto the street. A housewife was riding in the truck when the envelope dropped. I picked it up and pursued the truck in my car. When I finally caught up, the truck driver yelled at me, thinking I was trying to cause trouble. It took about 20 minutes to catch them. When I blocked their car, the driver shouted, “Why are you blocking my car in broad daylight?” I got out and handed them the envelope. The housewife fainted upon realizing what had happened. It was their housing deposit. Without that money, they couldn’t move into their new home. The driver and the housewife apologized profusely, and I made sure they verified the amount. It was important to confirm the 76 million won was all there, in case some had fallen out elsewhere. I hadn’t even looked at the amount when I chased them. The woman, however, checked the money carefully. When she confirmed it was all there, she embraced me and cried, overwhelmed with relief. She and her family would not have been able to move that day, and she might have faced divorce from her husband.

Should we condemn a woman for such a mistake? Absolutely not. We should never disrespect women. President Park Geun-hye is also a woman. No family that disrespects women prospers. Conversely, no family that treats women well has ever failed. Why should we treat women well? This is stated in our Cheonbugyeong and I Ching. Our national flag, the Taegeukgi, is designed in a certain way. The red represents the husband and heaven, while the blue represents the wife and earth. This is the principle of “Geon” (heaven) and “Gon” (earth). If “Geon” is placed above “Gon,” and the woman is below the man, the nation will perish. If the red is above and the blue is below, the nation will fail. The blue should be above, and the red should be below. In the I Ching, this configuration is called “Cheonjibi-gwae,” which signifies ruin. When the male energy is above, it ascends, and the female energy descends. This prevents harmony between husband and wife, leading to constant conflict and children who struggle. Our Taegeukgi, with heaven above and earth below, is designed to create conflict between North and South Korea, and within families. It should be reversed. When the feminine principle is above, it is called “Jicheontae-gwae,” which signifies an era of peace. Those who understand the I Ching know that a Taegeukgi designed this way leads to national ruin.

Our people have designed the Blue House (Cheong Wa Dae) with a name that portends ruin, and the Taegeukgi also carries this omen. This leads to constant divorce, reluctance to marry, and children who refuse to marry because they witness their parents’ constant quarrels over money. These children also struggle to find jobs. They choose to live alone rather than endure a marriage like their parents’. This leads to national decline. In the “Jicheontae-gwae,” when the earth is above and the man is below, the earth’s energy descends, and the man’s energy ascends, leading to the birth of children. This signifies family harmony. However, if a man is overly authoritarian at home and the woman is constantly criticized, the family will fail. In traditional Korean society, noble families entrusted women with the keys to the storeroom, elevating their status. Grandfathers were powerless, except during ancestral rites. Grandmothers held all the power, managing everything. Similarly, even kings, despite their apparent power, were managed by their queens, who oversaw the palace staff. Queens could even poison the king’s food to hasten their son’s ascension to the throne, especially if a concubine’s son was growing older and posed a threat. Thus, women held the power of life and death over men. If a woman puts money in her husband’s food, his teeth will break. Therefore, treating women well ensures a man’s prosperity. This also means avoiding concubines. The Joseon Dynasty fell due to the proliferation of concubines. When men held women in contempt and took many concubines, the principal wife would retaliate, leading to the downfall of the nation.

We must understand the I Ching. I am knowledgeable in all cosmic disciplines, having mastered the I Ching before elementary school. Therefore, I would never choose a wrong path, as I understand the laws of nature. I have never consumed alcohol, tobacco, coffee, soda, or cola. There is no need to. The I Ching begins with certain hexagrams. The first hexagram represents two men together, and the second represents two women together. These are the first and second hexagrams of the I Ching. The eleventh and twelfth hexagrams are also significant. Then there is “Hwasu Mije,” the 64th hexagram of the I Ching. “Hwasu Mije” is normally configured with the feminine principle outside and the masculine principle inside. If this is reversed, it signifies initial prosperity followed by ruin. However, if it is correctly oriented, with the feminine principle above and the masculine principle below, it is acceptable. The current Taegeukgi, however, is flawed. The red should be changed to blue, and the blue to red. This means reversing the positions. When the Taegeukgi was initially created, the Eight Trigrams were included. However, it was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan because Korea lacked a national flag. Since we are ignorant of the I Ching, we have continued to use this flawed design. Furthermore, Christians dislike the I Ching because it is associated with divination. The Taegeukgi itself has inherent problems. Japan’s flag, the Hinomaru, represents “Mugeuk” (the ultimate void). It is a simple circle, symbolizing the entire universe. This “Mugeuk” flag possesses immense power. The Taegeuk, however, is a failure. The Japanese intentionally designed our Taegeukgi to bring misfortune upon our nation, to divide us and weaken us. Therefore, the more one looks at it, the more bad luck it brings. It must be changed. Japan’s “Mugeuk” signifies nothingness. You must view things from the perspective of “Mugeuk.” When I speak of “Taegeuk,” I refer to discerning good from evil. But from the perspective of “Mugeuk,” one does not perceive good or evil. All humans are viewed as equal. I am not saying we should not fly our Taegeukgi. However, when the “Jicheontae-gwae” is applied, with the woman placed first, our nation becomes peaceful.

Consider President Park Geun-hye, a woman. Choi Soon-sil, a woman. Chung Yoo-ra, a woman. We should be more lenient towards women’s mistakes. We should view the transgressions of men and women differently. However, people are excessively agitated about this. We should be somewhat more lenient when women commit the same offenses. Yet, it seems the current reaction to the woman’s “skirt-chasing” scandal is quite severe. Of course, it was not right; mistakes were made. Our people are now calling for President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment. I spoke about Park Geun-hye four years ago. Let’s watch that video. This was done a week after Park Geun-hye was elected on December 19th. Immediately after her election, I was asked how long her administration would last. While people were ecstatic about her election, I was discussing when problems would arise and when her term would end. Would such wisdom be possible for you? Watch closely.

Park Geun-hye’s Saju (four pillars of destiny) is Shinmyosaeng (born in the year of the Metal Rabbit), Gyeongja-wol (Metal Rat month), Musul-il (Earth Dog day), and Gabin-si (Wood Tiger hour). This Saju, immediately after her election, reveals a problem in the current year, Byeongsin (Fire Monkey). The Shinmyo (Metal Rabbit) and Byeongsin (Fire Monkey) form a “Wonjinsal” (a type of conflicting energy). The Myo (Rabbit) and Shin (Monkey) are in a “Wonjinsal.” This year, 2016, is the Byeongsin year. Therefore, it would be difficult for Park Geun-hye to overcome 2016. The preceding years were fine. By the end of 2016, the “Wonjinsal” would bring trouble, signifying a year when a North-South war could occur. This year, if North Korea miscalculates, they could invade. If you protest excessively, you are helping whom? The president will step down even if you do nothing. Choi Soon-sil will go to prison even if you do nothing. Will the Korean people stand idly by? Will the prosecution remain inactive? If you react emotionally and incite anger, who are you helping? You are helping North Korea. Someone might miscalculate, thinking, “If they come down, they’re all our supporters.”

When Vietnam fell, I was one of those who escaped to Korea. I witnessed it firsthand. The person who ran against President Thieu was a spy. President Thieu’s chief of staff was also a spy. It was everywhere. If you go to Gwanghwamun now, you might encounter some strange people. You must warn your children. Which country would welcome such a situation? We all make mistakes in life. We can steal. But is it necessary to fight to the point of ruining the nation? The prosecution can send everyone to prison. Choi Soon-sil received all the approvals, but if war breaks out, we will receive bonuses. There is no need for that. Park Geun-hye’s Saju, if it weren’t for the Byeongsin year, would not be so bad. This year is her difficult year. But next year, it will improve.

Let’s look at President Park Chung-hee’s Saju. He was born in the year of Jeongsa (Fire Snake), a snake. His Saju is unique, similar to Park Geun-hye’s, but he was born in the year of Sinhye (Metal Pig), Gyeongsin-il (Metal Monkey day), and Muin-si (Earth Tiger hour). This was in 1917. Park Geun-hye was born in 1951, on November 26th (lunar calendar). Her father passed away on October 26th. This is the solar calendar, and that is the lunar calendar. After 1952, it’s the solar calendar. So, she should be a rabbit, but by the solar calendar, she’s a dragon. Look closely at President Park Chung-hee’s Saju. It contains In-Shin-Sa-Hae (Tiger, Monkey, Snake, Pig), which signifies a revolutionary. A revolutionary wields a sword, and no one can survive against it. It also contains Shin-Ja-Jin (Monkey, Rat, Dragon) Samhap (three-harmony combination). Such individuals have unique Saju. When these elements are present, the person is formidable. There are about 200,000 people in Korea with a Saju like Park Chung-hee’s, but not all of them become president. This is due to their physiognomy and inner disposition. No matter how good the Saju, meeting Yuk Young-soo (Park Chung-hee’s wife) is different from meeting another woman. Everyone’s destiny changes. Furthermore, physiognomy differs, leading to entirely different fates. So, Saju only has a 0.1% influence. The “Daeun” (great luck cycle) also influences a person. Park Geun-hye’s luck this year, the Byeongsin year, is not favorable. It is a “Wonjinsal,” indicating conflict and misfortune. Therefore, this year, she will suffer the most humiliating disgrace in the history of Korean presidents and will step down. She became president, but in the hearts of the people, she has already departed. Power exists when it can be exercised, not merely by sitting in the Blue House.

We must abandon male-centric thinking. Should we fight to the death over a woman’s mistakes, like the “Cheonjibi-gwae”? We should only fight like that against Japan. However, President Park Geun-hye is the first female president in our country, and her upbringing was unique. She had a unique friend. A president should not speak like this, but I acknowledge it. The president is not someone who would deny it. Because they were so close, she constantly asked her friend for advice, and her friend used various information. I believe President Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution. No prosecutor’s investigation would find her guilty of a constitutional violation. I am not an ordinary person; I am fully aware of the legal aspects. President Park Geun-hye absolutely did not violate the constitution. Even if a special prosecutor were to investigate, they would try to frame her for a constitutional violation. However, a president has the special economic authority to instruct, for example, “Promote cultural enrichment projects,” or “Give semiconductors to LG, Hyundai, and Hynix.” A president can issue such directives. A president can suddenly order currency changes or implement a real-name financial system. Does a president need to consult anyone? No, they don’t. They can discreetly ask their close associates. If they tell people in the Blue House, it will quickly spread. So, a president can ask a decades-long friend, “What do you think about implementing a real-name financial system?” If the friend says it’s a good idea, the president can proceed because they trust that person. The president holds emergency financial powers and emergency decree powers regarding the national economy. To claim this is a constitutional violation is absurd. “Let’s do some cultural enrichment projects. Don’t just hoard money in your factories; do these projects.” If cultural enrichment projects are not undertaken, what will unemployed Koreans do? Do you see the president as a prime minister? The president has emergency financial decree powers, emergency powers, and the power to declare war. The president also has the power of pardon. Even for the most heinous crimes, the president can pardon. Can prosecutors accuse the president of violating the law for pardoning criminals? The president can issue a directive, “Release all murderers and death row inmates.” The president has the power of pardon. They are given these rights, and then people complain when they exercise them. The wrongdoer is Choi Soon-sil, and she should be thoroughly punished. What grave crime did the presidential secretary for political affairs, who received immunity from the president, commit? I am a law school graduate, specializing in constitutional law. The president would never violate the constitution. Close associates might deceive or mislead the president, but is our president like a Vietnamese president?

Our former presidents accumulated 1,500 trillion won in household debt. The state currently reports 1,350 trillion won, but I know it’s closer to 1,500 trillion won. This debt was created and siphoned off by former male presidents, not President Park Geun-hye. I know of hundreds of trillions of won, but I won’t name names. President Park Geun-hye is not someone who would touch a single won of state money. I am not her fan, but you need to reconsider. Former presidents’ sons and brothers exploited their positions, leading to problems. I even consider former President Lee Myung-bak’s brother to be a very capable person. When his younger brother was studying, the two brothers worked together, one becoming a Hyundai Group chairman and the other a National Assembly member. His brother was a CEO of Kolon Group and other companies. The two brothers starved, and Lee Myung-bak even fainted several times from hunger during school. He worked as a street vendor, pushing a cart in high school. So, I feel human sympathy for President Lee Myung-bak and his brother. However, those around former presidents exploited their positions, and the amounts involved were astronomical. Yet, we are now making a fuss over Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-chasing” scandal. Therefore, coming here is better than going to demonstrations. You will receive more blessings by being here than by protesting there.

Now, before Huh Kyung young runs for president, is there anyone in South Korea among the current politicians who can save our nation? Is there any presidential candidate from either party with physiognomy like Huh Kyung young’s? There are no “Blue Dragon” or “Yellow Dragon” physiognomies among the presidential candidates. Who is coming from the US? Ban Ki-moon has a “tree frog” physiognomy, always hopping around. Ahn Cheol-soo has a “goat” physiognomy. He left the Democratic Party because he was sulking. Goats are prone to sulking and will butt you if you call them. Moon Jae-in always causes problems, so he has a “cow” physiognomy. Cows work hard and then go to the slaughterhouse. Their hooves and horns are used to make crafts; nothing is wasted. They are thoroughly exploited. There’s someone chasing Moon Jae-in. Lee Jae-myung, the mayor of Seongnam, mentioned Huh Kyung young. Let’s watch the video. Lee Jae-myung went to lecture at Korea University and said that the person he respects most is Huh Kyung young, and that his statement about the country not lacking money but having too many thieves is 100% correct. Let’s see that. Mayor Lee Jae-myung has a “rat” physiognomy. I am speaking directly about physiognomy. He has a “dragon-in-waiting” physiognomy, meaning he cannot become a dragon. Obstacles appear whenever he tries to ascend, forcing him to descend. He spends his time going up and down. He is a typical politician who inspires young people to follow him. Lee Jae-myung started the youth allowance. The representative of the Saenuri Party warned that they would be judged. He refers to Huh Kyung young as “Teacher Huh Kyung young.” Politicians are not usually called “teacher,” except for Kim Dae-jung. Please give him a round of applause. You understand now, right? He said that the country doesn’t lack money, but has too many thieves. I said I would save 50% of the national budget and put it in your bank accounts.

Furthermore, how will I eliminate the 1,300 trillion won in household debt? When I become president, I will quickly eliminate it. Those with loans under 500 million won for homes will have their debts repaid by the state, free of charge. Whether it’s 400 million or 300 million for a 500 million won home, the state will repay it. How? By selling off state-owned enterprises, real estate, and unnecessary land, the state will first repay the household debts of those in need. Then, for the remaining 1,300 trillion won in loans, the state will pay the interest. This will solve the household debt problem. Without solving this, our nation has no hope. The economy will not recover. People will spend all their earnings paying bank interest. They borrow money to get married and then pay interest. I will provide 700,000 won to those over 65, a 1.5 million won citizen dividend, and 200 million won for housing to those who marry. So, there will be no need for money. Huh Kyung young will pay the bank interest. Debts under 500 million won will be repaid. By selling off unnecessary state-owned land, the nation’s debts will be settled first, allowing people to use their money for food and groceries, stimulating the economy. Furthermore, middle and high school students will only take one subject exam, and the college entrance exam will be abolished. For example, if someone excels in music for six years, their total score of 5,000 points will qualify them for Seoul National University. With the abolition of the college entrance exam, money spent on private tutoring and cram schools will become living expenses, circulating money and revitalizing the economy. This will make people happy.

President Park Chung-hee was born on the day of the monkey. Park Geun-hye, his daughter, was born in the year of Jeongsa (Fire Snake), but on a monkey day. This means that problems arose for Park Geun-hye in the year of the monkey. This also caused conflict with President Park Chung-hee. His birthplace caught fire, and Seomun Market also caught fire. This signifies immense events. His daughter, instead of honoring her parents, dragged their names through a black hole. Although she is enduring, it is a situation that would be unbearable in most countries. Therefore, excessive leniency can lead to problems. This is what I am saying. His daughter, who became president and is now stepping down, is associated with the monkey. The day Park Chung-hee was born and the Byeongsin year are linked. The fire is not an ordinary fire; it is a fire that could engulf the entire Korean Peninsula in the Byeongsin year. You know about the Byeongja Horan (Qing invasion of Joseon in 1636), and this “Byeongja” has arrived. Therefore, you must listen carefully to Huh Kyung young.

In Korean, “Seolsanggasang” means “adding frost to snow.” It refers to a situation where problems accumulate. We tend to focus on others’ faults while ignoring our own. We only attack others. This leads to “Seolsanggasang.” It’s like having snow already, and then more problems arise. We are already troubled by Choi Soon-sil, and now people are demanding her resignation, claiming she violated the constitution. There is a sense of betrayal by a friend, but people did not know that President Park Geun-hye would do such things. The media is portraying it as if she knew and instigated it. People believed that eating American beef would cause brain damage and death. They all went out with candles, but American beef is healthier than Korean Hanwoo, which is raised in confined spaces and constantly given antibiotics. American beef comes from cattle raised freely on vast pastures, under clear skies, without pollution or yellow dust. They are killed humanely with a single electric shock to the forehead, preventing the meat from being contaminated by stress toxins. Yet, people believed that Korean beef was safe and American beef was deadly, leading to widespread protests. The media can easily ruin numerous businesses with a single misstep. While we may not want to promote American products, we should not lie. We must present the truth as it is. Similarly, any candlelight vigil seems to cause problems.

Look at Obama. He asked Korean reporters a question, acknowledging their excellent hosting. But no Korean reporter stood up. An awkward silence ensued. No one came forward. Korean reporters need an interpreter when asked questions in Korean. Then a Chinese reporter stood up and said, “I will interview on behalf of the Koreans.” He said, “I apologize for disappointing you, but I am a Chinese reporter. May I ask a question on behalf of Asia?” What does this mean? Korean reporters are adept at uncovering every detail about Choi Soon-sil, but they fabricate stories to frame Huh Kyung young. They claimed I didn’t meet Bush, but it was later revealed that I did. This was distorted by the media, making it seem like I had defrauded the entire nation. How unfair is that? But I don’t say anything because that’s the nature of the Korean media. So, Obama asked, “Are there no Korean reporters? Please come forward.” He gave them plenty of time, but no one came. Then the Chinese reporter said, “May I interview on behalf of Korea?” This reflects our nation’s status. Koreans are only interested in the wrongdoings of women and politicians, lacking a global mindset. They lack a macroscopic perspective. We need a macroscopic perspective, but Korean reporters have a microscopic perspective. We must view the Choi Soon-sil scandal macroscopically. In past administrations, presidents’ sons, the presidents themselves, and close associates of Presidents Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo embezzled vast sums, and people were very lenient. But this is the first time a 40-year friend has been involved. Why such jealousy? Of course, there were mistakes, and I acknowledge the manipulation of state affairs. However, since it was a friend, not a blood relative, the president might not have known. She strictly managed her relatives but failed to manage her friend. That is the president’s mistake. Is the president someone who would tell her secretaries, “Go ahead and take money from these projects”? I believe our nation is in serious trouble. Even if you fabricate something, there’s a limit. Even if the entire nation criticizes me, I will speak the truth with open eyes.

The Korean reporter was not a Korean reporter. Obama explicitly stated, “I asked a question to a Korean reporter.” This situation escalated. What are Korean reporters doing? They didn’t come forward. He kept asking, even though there were dozens of Korean reporters present. It was truly embarrassing. The opportunity went to a Chinese reporter. Do you understand what I mean? They are desperate to catch Huh Kyung young or Choi Soon-sil, but Obama said that the Korean media only talks about Choi Soon-sil and knows nothing else. This is a serious issue for us to consider. Obama was a truly great president in American history. What Obama did well was when the Sewol ferry sank, a female crew member, Park Ji-young, saved many students while the male crew members, including the captain, disguised themselves and fled. Park Ji-young sacrificed her life, saving students who were told not to leave. She died trying to save even one more student. She died in the line of duty. But not a single male crew member stayed; they all fled. Men should be ashamed of this. That’s why I say that if men are always above women, the family will fall apart. Obama awarded Park Ji-young the Gold Medal and honored her as a world hero, even creating a commemorative stamp. But did Korea do anything? No commemorative medal, no heroic recognition. The US president ordered this. There was also another female teacher, Choi Hye-jeong, in Ansan, who died trying to save students. This reflects on you. How have Korean men been educated? When I become president, such things will not happen. Let’s give a round of applause for Choi Hye-jeong and Park Ji-young. Obama created commemorative stamps and medals for both of them. He was a great president. But when Obama asked Korean people to speak, they didn’t even express gratitude for his recognition of Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jeong. They were too busy inciting the Korean public, making it easier for Kim Jong-un to invade.

They are trying to ruin the country over one woman. The woman’s mistakes should be strictly handled by the prosecution. Is that not right? We are leading the country with this Taegeukgi, and the Blue House is called the “Blue Tiled House.” This is unacceptable. The Blue House should be called “Haneulgung” (Sky Palace). It is the palace where the children of the Korean people reside. “Haneulgung.” When written in Korean, it is “Haneulgong.” It’s funny, isn’t it? “Today’s KBS morning news: President Huh Kyung young at Haneulgung.” This is what it should be called. Is a blue-tiled house in one’s backyard the Blue House? The Blue House is a “Blue House.” The US has the “White House.” “White collar” refers to the wealthy, while “blue collar” refers to prisoners or laborers. Prisoners wear blue uniforms. We are making ourselves “blue collar” by having a “Blue House.” The Taegeukgi is also flawed. Therefore, the Korean people must wake up. We must deeply reflect on figures like Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jeong of the Sewol ferry incident. Their stories should be included in textbooks, and their families should receive pensions. Their heroic deeds should be documented in books. We must never forget the Sewol ferry incident.

Macroeconomics is state-led economics. The US adopted Keynesian economics and faced the Great Depression. Microeconomics was championed by British Prime Minister Thatcher, American President Reagan, and Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping. In 1978, Deng Xiaoping invited Hayek to Beijing and asked how the Chinese people could escape poverty. Hayek advised that farmers should not be forced to surrender their harvests but should be allowed to sell them in the market, keeping the profits. This would revitalize the economy. China implemented this, which is a form of modified capitalism, and began to prosper. So, there are times when macroeconomics is needed and times when microeconomics is needed. However, Korea has accumulated 1,500 trillion won in household debt and is now raising interest rates from 2-3% to 5%. As household debt rapidly increases, banks fear collapse, so they are restricting loans. This forces people to take out new loans to pay interest on old ones, trapping them in a cycle of debt. Are politicians devising solutions for this? They are restricting loans, saying, “Don’t give loans to those without business registration numbers; they’re just for living expenses or to pay bank interest.” These are the people who go to candlelight vigils. It’s not always about Choi Soon-sil. They are protesting because the national economy is unbearable. This is a reflection of the situation. While Hayek’s microeconomics was good for China, can we say macroeconomics is bad? For example, sending LG’s semiconductors to Hyundai, is that micro or macroeconomics? It’s macro. Why did President Park Geun-hye not address the Hanjin Shipping crisis, which paralyzed global logistics? The shipping industry needed restructuring. Failing shipping companies should have been downsized and merged to create strong companies. The Blue House was aware of the shipping recession but was only engaged in partisan infighting.

Consider the Constitutional Court’s swift dissolution of a political party, the Unified Progressive Party. The speed was remarkably fast. From our perspective, this speed was abnormal. Whether it’s catching communists or suspicious company presidents, a democratic nation must follow due process. Is it not so? It takes a day to establish a foundation led by the state, but two months for a foundation created by citizens? A state-created organization is undoubtedly legitimate, but why was the process so fast? Our people cannot accept this. Even if President Park Geun-hye genuinely wanted to create it, she should have followed due process, taking a month or two. While citizen-submitted foundation applications take two months, state-led foundations are established in a day, with meetings fabricated at desks without actual attendance. Is this acceptable? This is what incites public anger. It wasn’t theft, and the money didn’t go anywhere. But for us, the “yeonhyeok” (history), which means the process, is important. The process of creating the foundation is more important than the outcome. The outcome is not what the people prioritize. The speed of dissolving the party was incredibly fast. The speed of creating the Mir and K-Sports foundations was also incredibly fast. But when you submit a petition because you are struggling, it disappears. It takes a long time. Try creating a foundation yourself; it takes a long time. They fabricated meeting minutes, writing them alone without anyone present. The prosecution investigated and found that meetings were fabricated. Such things provoke our people. No one embezzled money from those foundations. Did the president take 76 billion won? No. For our people, “yeonhyeok,” process, induction, and deduction are important. This flawed process is the problem.

When the Constitutional Court dissolved the party, Lee Jung-hyun, the female representative, debated President Park Geun-hye on TV, saying, “I came out to bring you down.” Lee Jung-hee is the person I’m referring to. Her name is similar to Lee Jung-hyun. In the TV debate with President Park Geun-hye, she called the president the daughter of a dictator and vowed to bring her down. Should President Park Geun-hye have held onto that? No, she should have dismissed it. She should have thought, “My father was a great man, and the people know it, regardless of what you say.” She should have moved on. But from the people’s perspective, President Park Geun-hye retaliated against these people. Because the Constitutional Court dissolved the party, President Park Geun-hye is now facing the Constitutional Court. This is karma. Should we react emotionally? Our emotions are governed by reason. And what should reason be governed by? Reason is intellect. It cannot follow spirituality. In the 21st century, politics must be governed by spirituality. When I look at Park Geun-hye, I know she will step down in four years. When I look at Trump, I see he is a dark horse among 16 Republican candidates. When I appeared on TV then, they said I resembled Trump. He was the last-place Republican candidate, not yet nominated. But when I saw his face, I knew he had the physiognomy of a president. That spiritual eye is called “yeongseong” (spiritual insight). Do any current politicians possess this? No. The faster President Park Geun-hye steps down, the more dangerous our nation becomes. Why? Is there a spiritually insightful leader among the current presidential candidates? No. I don’t want to enter such a funeral-like situation. I have a specific time when I want to enter. If an unsuitable person enters, what will happen to our nation? It will be completely ruined. It will never recover. Former presidents’ embezzlements have left the Industrial Bank in disarray, and all banks are struggling. Our national debt ratio exceeds 40%. When I saw the state of the nation’s finances, I was heartbroken. “Ah, I have come into a den of thieves.” Is that not right? How can I help the people? How much is this household debt? What is the daily interest? How much money do we have left each day? We can’t even pay the interest. What will the people eat? President Park Geun-hye must have been heartbroken when she heard that chaebols were moving factories to Vietnam or even Myanmar to make a profit, with no one reinvesting in Korea. So, she had no choice but to start cultural enrichment projects. I understand why she did it. Seeing the state of the nation’s finances, the president was heartbroken. President Park Geun-hye should have controlled her emotions, but she failed to do so, which led to problems.

What is “Banpojihyo”? People often confuse “Gwanpoji-gyo” (friendship between Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya) with “Banpojihyo” (filial piety of crows). “Banpojihyo” refers to crows feeding their parents the same number of worms they received as chicks, even after their parents die, building a nest over their parents’ graves. This is the filial piety of crows. In Korea, the three elements of filial piety are “Mulhyo” (material filial piety), “Simhyo” (filial piety of the heart), and “Daehyo” (great filial piety). Crows perform “Mulhyo” and “Simhyo,” but not “Daehyo.” “Daehyo” means achieving success and bringing honor to one’s family name. For example, if one becomes president, their family name rises. However, President Park Geun-hye, having become president on the back of her father’s achievements, has brought disgrace upon her parents. Is this not the opposite of “Banpojihyo”? This is a huge problem. Even crows practice “Banpojihyo,” but they cannot achieve “Daehyo.” Humans, however, can. The three elements of filial piety are “Saengjeonjihyo” (filial piety during parents’ lifetime), “Sahujihyo” (filial piety after parents’ death), and “Samhyo” (three filial pieties). I am explaining this because there are three things one must do while parents are alive: “Mulhyo,” “Simhyo,” and “Daehyo.” Getting married quickly and having grandchildren is “Simhyo.” When choosing a daughter-in-law, a filial child chooses someone their mother would approve of, not just someone they like. An unfilial child chooses someone they like.

“Sahujihyo” means honoring the good deeds of one’s parents, like President Park Chung-hee’s integrity, and always considering their struggles and sacrifices. This requires careful attention to personnel appointments. Any slight misstep can negate “Sahujihyo.” Instead of practicing “Sahujihyo,” she has posthumously disgraced her parents. People have burned down her parents’ birthplace, vandalized their home, and even tried to steal from their grave. I witnessed someone trying to dig up President Park Chung-hee’s grave with a pickaxe. I confronted him. He was 82 years old. He claimed President Park Chung-hee had tormented Kim Dae-jung, and he had read a book about it. He then became a supporter of President Park Chung-hee, despite having been a fervent supporter of Kim Dae-jung. “Sahujihyo” means always remembering the good deeds of one’s parents, their frugality, their suffering, and their quiet endurance of pain until their death. This makes a child reflect before buying an expensive item, thinking, “My mother wore rubber shoes, do I really need these 1 million won shoes?” Or, “My mother always wore simple ramie clothes, should I really buy this expensive outfit just because I’m a bit better off now?” This leads to constant self-restraint out of respect for parents. However, the current president has failed in this regard. When practicing “Sahujihyo,” siblings should gather harmoniously on their parents’ death anniversary, whether for a memorial service or just to discuss. But President Park Geun-hye prevented her siblings from visiting even on Lunar New Year. This makes the public suspect that Choi Tae-min’s side was involved, leading to greater resentment. Even so, we must set aside emotions and view things with spiritual insight, which is above reason. We must look at the future of the Korean people. If we fight emotionally, will things improve? No. The speed at which the Constitutional Court dissolved the Unified Progressive Party, and the speed at which the Mir and K-Sports foundations were created, were incomprehensible to the public.

We should not do anything to others. When we hear things, we should just listen. We should not use power to eliminate those we dislike. What happens then? We should attribute good things to others, to our parents, and to heaven. And bad things, our own unpleasant feelings, should be attributed to ourselves. If we violate this, judgment will come. Consider Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya, whose friendship is legendary. One of them recommended the other to the king as a minister. The king investigated and found the person to be a thief and of poor character. The king asked, “Why did you recommend such a person?” The friend replied, “Your Majesty, are you seeking a sage, or someone who can manage the nation’s affairs?” He said, “We need someone to save our poor country. Therefore, a former criminal is suitable. This person is the right choice.” He recommended him to the king, knowing he would be criticized. “Are you seeking a virtuous person, or a capable worker to save the nation?” The king replied, “I am seeking a capable worker.” “Then let us use this person.” This is like an election. The king then supported him. This is perhaps like Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil. Park Geun-hye trusted her, even though she was such a person. Our proverb says, “The trusted axe splits your foot.” But in China, it seems it was not so. Their relationship was very good.

The time is already 5:30. Time flies when we talk. Now, singer Choi Sarang will perform. Since there are many new attendees today, please come forward quickly for healing. Many people say that there is no longer any hope in the existing political establishment. I hope that all these aspirations gather to create such a world. People from all over the world are recognizing the President. A philosophy professor from the US has come. Welcome. My name is Jung Hyung-soon, and my American name is David Jung. I majored in religious philosophy. The domestic situation is so chaotic that I came to see what was happening, and it is much more serious than I imagined. Normally, next year would be the presidential election, and I came to Korea early to help a certain individual who worked at the UN, whom you all know well. However, after coming here, I realized that while he is not lacking in leadership, he is not suitable for Korea. In the US, when I met people, everyone had their own national style, whether Korean or American. But in the US, he seemed to fit well. However, comparing my thoughts in the US with my observations in Korea, I realized he would not be the right person. The current situation is not ordinary. I also met a certain individual in Seongnam City, who is gaining popularity. When I arrived, his approval rating was not even 10%, but now it has surpassed 10%. He has even surpassed Ban Ki-moon. I met him yesterday, and I also connected with a former leader of the Saenuri Party, a certain President Lee. At that time, I wasn’t sure if he would run for president. But he recently withdrew from the race. So, there’s no need to discuss him further. I met other capable individuals, hoping to assist in the presidential election with my limited abilities. Then, while researching online, I learned about President Huh Kyung young. I spent several days just searching the internet, watching his speeches and activities. I realized he is someone the era demands, someone absolutely necessary for this time. I had planned to explain why this era requires President Huh Kyung young for about 20 minutes today, but time is short, and I’m hungry, so I need to leave soon. However, to put it simply, next time, you will be surprised when you hear why President Huh Kyung young is necessary for this era. I am also a professor, but no one can give 1,055 lectures like this. I was nicknamed “Computer Professor” by my students because I never lectured with slides or notes. But that’s my specialty, so it’s possible. However, watching his lectures online, I realized he has no boundaries. When I was in the US, I had certain thoughts, but coming to Korea, I understood what kind of leader this era demands. Napoleon was not Napoleon because of his appearance; he was an unattractive, unappealing man. Yet, the era created him as a leader and a hero. Similarly, President Huh Kyung young made prophecies about Korea 25 years ago, but they were not suitable then. But now, such a person is needed. Let me give you one example: Do you know about the Yulgok Project? What kind of project is it? It’s a defense industry project. Can this be resolved or not? No, it cannot be resolved. Why? Because even if you seize power, if you try to resolve it, you will be shot. Everyone involved, from high-ranking officials to military personnel, is connected to it. If there isn’t a military coup, the person’s term will end, and they will either die or go to prison. What can be done about that? Only someone willing to die can do it. So, what kind of person does the era demand? Someone who says, “I am willing to die. I will save Korea.” When you listen to the current candidates, they all say they will save the nation. But if you look closely, they are not willing to die. That’s the problem. They all claim to be included. He has a philosophy. Only with the resolve to die can one create a better world out of this dark one. They lack that courage. So, I changed my mind. I realized that Korea absolutely cannot have an ordinary person as president. It is impossible.

You are rich. I love you. Be rich. Your happiness is my happiness. You will be rich. Be happy, be rich. I love you. Everyone despairs at some point, and everyone finds things difficult at times, but it’s not impossible. I love you. Be strong. Be happy. I love you. I love you. I love you. I love you. Wait. Let’s read a YouTube comment today. “President Huh Kyung young, from Montreal, Canada, I was deeply moved by this lecture. There is absolutely no politician in Korea who can comprehensively view domestic and international issues with such wisdom and insight as Huh Kyung young. I am simply captivated by your vast knowledge and profound wisdom that penetrates history. I met several presidential candidates currently being discussed in political circles during my visit to Korea on September 10th, and honestly, Mayor Lee Jae-myung of Seongnam was the most impressive. I understand that Lee Jae-myung said President Huh Kyung young is the person he respects most in Korea, and I believe this is a significant statement. In my opinion, after meeting Moon Jae-in, Park Won-soon, Chung Dong-young, Son Hak-kyu, etc., they are only 20% of President Huh Kyung young’s level. This is astonishing. My two meetings during my visit to Korea will help garner much support from Korean residents in Canada. I will do my best to promote you to young people and adults.” This was on November 21st, ten days ago.

The Gukje Shinmun (International Newspaper) recently published an article titled “Will a Korean Trump Emerge Next Year?” Min Byung-doo, a strategic expert of the Democratic Party, who is known for his foresight, stated in a media interview that in the US, angry leftists supported Sanders, and right-wing populists supported Trump. He predicted that if Korea continues on its current path, the economy will worsen, and if a bold candidate like Huh Kyung young does not emerge, the public will not easily be swayed. This is a strategy of the Democratic Party, and many newspapers are reporting on me. Now, even the opposition party says that without a bold person like Huh Kyung young, there is no hope. There are other articles besides the Trump one. The Korea Daily also published an article saying that Huh Kyung young’s presidency would be like the birth of a new era. Commentators have written in newspapers, “The Saenuri Party should not fight Park Geun-hye but should recruit Huh Kyung young.” More and more articles are appearing about me. Let’s watch the video about Trump’s election. For those who are here for the first time, please watch. There is a candidate making pledges. On September 24, 2015, when Trump appeared on MBN, they said he resembled me, and I said, “That person will be the president of the United States. That person is the hope of America.” How could I say that about a last-place candidate? But the moment I saw him, I knew. Some people say that my pledges are a bit too extreme and that I have a showman’s flair, which might make some uncomfortable. We would like to hear your thoughts on this. We are preparing a panel for the election. You will run again this time, right? Many people are interested, but they don’t take it seriously, even if they find the attacks on the established political parties refreshing. There are criticisms that my pledges are absurd. How do you evaluate this? If an expert becomes president, there will be no war on the Korean Peninsula. He knows what North Korea wants and what South Korea wants. South Korea wants more money. If we give them money, they will not fight, 100%. If we say we will bear more of the security burden, it will be fine. He is a businessman, so we can ask him for favors. Such a person is better. If Hillary Clinton were president, she might secretly collude with North Korea, which would be terrifying. If Hillary Clinton became president, war on the Korean Peninsula would be possible. This was in May 2016. I said that if Hillary won, war would break out in Korea, so it shouldn’t happen. But all global media said Hillary had a 99% chance of winning, even on election day. Then, at the last minute, it was overturned. But I had the insight to see this a year and a half in advance. Even though he was last among 16 Republican candidates, I saw a president’s face. We need such spiritual insight, but do our current politicians have it? No. If Park Geun-hye steps down quickly, a worse person will likely take her place. If that happens, our children and young university students will become servants to China, and our nation will be ruined, with what little remains stolen.

Let’s look at the possibility of a spiritual connection between the US and North Korea, and who will be the 19th president. This is from an internet article. “The 19th president, according to a diviner who predicted President Roh Moo-hyun’s suicide and Trump’s election, is…” This is on the internet. Prominent presidential candidates are actively engaging in diplomatic efforts to build ties with Trump and quickly cover up all facts about Choi Soon-sil. Enraged citizens are now gathering in Gwanghwamun Square, calling for President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment. Naturally, attention is turning to the 19th presidential election, to be held on December 7th next year. It is the people’s right to be interested in a new president. The article then addresses the public’s curiosity and presents a prophecy. “Recently, a post titled ‘The 19th President Predicted by a Diviner Who Foretold All Political Events’ gained attention in online communities. This diviner, who garnered attention for predicting President Park Chung-hee’s assassination, President Roh Moo-hyun’s election and death, the death years of Kim Il-sung and his son, Trump’s election, and even President Park Geun-hye, shocked the public with his prediction for the 19th president.” Such a diviner exists, but his abilities are nothing compared to mine. However, according to his claims, none of the currently discussed presidential candidates can become the 19th president of Korea. He stated, “If we saw the eccentric Trump become the US president, Korea must also learn something. The trend of the times follows the US, and Korea will also see an individual currently perceived as eccentric eventually become the owner of the Blue House.” Who did he predict would be the 19th president? “He said Huh Kyung young would be the owner of the Blue House.” This is from an MBC capture. Netizens were bewildered. “Is that even possible?” “Such things can happen in our military.” “It’s faster for me to become president than for Huh Kyung young.” Such students exist. While these reactions dismiss it as mere rumor, some express fear about the absurd rumors. Indeed, things once considered absurd in Korea have become reality. The president is suspected of drug use, and there are even rumors of children being sacrificed. Furthermore, with Trump’s election, a new history is beginning. Perhaps we should not focus on Huh Kyung young but lament the fact that there are no capable leaders who can satisfy the people, to the extent that such rumors even emerge.

The diviner predicted the next president, the 19th. However, I do not wish to enter by pulling down those who are currently in power. I want to run in a fair election next December. It is not good to climb by stepping on others. We should have a normal election. The presidential election is currently underway. On October 22nd, the last day, 93% of Koreans supported Hillary. This was reported by Maeil Business Newspaper. Maeil Business Newspaper reported that 93% of Koreans supported Hillary, and 76% believed Hillary would win the US presidential election. Korean support for Hillary was 93%, while Trump received 7%. Should we elect a US president who will prevent a nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula? Only Huh Kyung young can make that decision. Huh Kyung young determines the US president. Who created President Trump? I am someone who can unify the world, but I am ashamed to fight with the petty politicians in Korea. So, I will run directly in the presidential election next year. That concludes today’s lecture. Is it 6 o’clock already? If you have any questions, please come to Haneulgung. And for those who are here for the first time, please come forward.

Now, one man from Geoje has come all the way from Busan. He looks healthy. You know that Huh Kyung young is from above, with cosmic energy, and is the opposite of ordinary people, right? Let’s see. Show your hand. You understand this, right? Okay, camera. Take it off. Now, think of Huh Kyung young, Jesus, or Sakyamuni in your mind, without letting me know who it is. Start. That’s Jesus. Sakyamuni. Yes, yes. Even if you think it in your mind, it doesn’t fall. Only my name does that on this planet. If you just look at my picture, it happens. Your pictures, even Buddha’s and Jesus’, will fall. If you call Huh Kyung young, your illness will improve. And if I see you directly, I will heal you. So, I am a special envoy. I was not conceived like you, but I dislike organized religion. It’s fine to go to church or temple. Pastors and monks are all good people. They all do good work. However, you must pray in the name of Jesus, “Amen,” and then say “Huh Kyung young.” Say “Namu Amita Bul” and then “World Unification.” I came from above, with a body like yours, but my energy is the opposite of yours. This doesn’t just happen here; it’s the same at home. So, if you call my name and sleep, your age will go backward. You will age less, and your lifespan will increase. You aged because you didn’t call my name.

Now, let’s check for illness. Hand, hand. This is like a stethoscope. If there’s cancer, the hand will automatically drop. This person has no cancer, but they have many other problems. Let’s try again. Give me some strength. You have no strength. But if you put it here, it doesn’t hurt. It doesn’t drop. It’s strong. Try taking it off just once. Start. It’s powerful. I am becoming. Look. One, two, three. It’s strong. No strength. It falls. But this person has problems on this side. Put it here too. It falls. Now, the entire bronchial system. Let’s check the bronchi. Was there strength? No. It’s truly weak, just as I said. It’s the same when this person takes it off. It all falls. But this person’s entire left side is bad. The thyroid is zero, and the bronchi are zero. You don’t smoke, so why is this happening? You don’t smoke. Your bronchi are bad. Forehead. Start. Stroke and paralysis are also coming. Let’s see tomorrow. I will fix it. Look at my car. I’ve fixed everything now. It doesn’t fall anywhere now. It doesn’t move. Try it however you want. I’ve changed you into a child. It doesn’t fall. It doesn’t fall. Nothing falls. Try your bronchi. Does it fall? No. You just need to look at me. Even in the US, you can look at me on your phone. Then that person will be healed. There is no such doctor in the world. None. I am not deceiving the teacher. Is there anyone who can do that in 0.1 seconds with hypnosis? No. I am the one who created public opinion, who came to Korea in a human body. You are blessed. I don’t need to create a religion. I don’t need to. I don’t care if people call my name or not. You just need to call my name. I don’t need to receive money. Complete healing. You need to exercise your back. Look at me. I’ve fixed everything. Now stand sideways. Since you called Huh Kyung young loudly, you will succeed. That’s all.

Now, let’s start from this side. This is a department store. I’m fixing everything in the department store. It’s a department store now. It’s all done. Stand behind me. Close your eyes. If one person stands behind me, I will know. Behind. Women often get breast cancer, so if I check once, they won’t get breast cancer. I’ve fixed everything. The heart is also gone, and I need to check the joints. Done. Okay. It’s all done.

Prophecies regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and candlelight vigils, Trump’s election, Heo Kyung-young’s presidential candidacy and world unificationHeo Kyung-young’s Saturday Lecture (December 3, 2016)current political and economic issues, and a demonstration of Heo Kyung-young’s “energy” healing.

Character Profiles

• 허경영 (Heo Kyung-young) | Lecturer, Presidential Candidate | Claims to have prophetic abilities and unique spiritual insights. He advocates for radical economic and political reforms.
• 박근혜 (Park Geun-hye) | Former President of South Korea | Subject of a lecture discussing her impeachment and the surrounding political events.
• 트럼프 (Trump) | Former US President | His election was allegedly predicted by Heo Kyung-young.
• 최순실 (Choi Soon-sil) | Associate of Park Geun-hye | Implicated in a political scandal that led to Park Geun-hye’s impeachment.
• 정유라 (Chung Yoo-ra) | Daughter of Choi Soon-sil | Her involvement in the scandal contributed to public outrage.
• 이재명 (Lee Jae-myung) | Seongnam Mayor | Mentioned as a politician who respects Heo Kyung-young’s views on national finances.
• 반기문 (Ban Ki-moon) | Former UN Secretary-General | Described as a potential presidential candidate not suitable for Korea.
• 안철수 (Ahn Cheol-soo) | Politician | Described with a “goat-like” personality, prone to sulking.
• 문재인 (Moon Jae-in) | Politician | Described as a “cow-like” figure, hardworking but easily exploited.
• 정형순 (Jung Hyung-soon) / 데이빗 정 (David Jung) | Philosophy Professor from the US | Attends the lecture and expresses support for Heo Kyung-young, believing he is the leader Korea needs.
• 박지영 (Park Ji-young) | Sewol Ferry Crew Member | Died while saving students during the Sewol ferry disaster. Honored by Obama.
• 최혜정 (Choi Hye-jung) | Ansan Teacher | Died while saving students during the Sewol ferry disaster. Honored by Obama.
• 민병두 (Min Byung-doo) | Democratic Party Strategist | Acknowledges the need for a bold candidate like Heo Kyung-young in Korean politics.

Scene-by-Scene Summary

1 (00:00:00)

• Heo Kyung-young greets the audience, noting that those who came to his lecture instead of a protest are fortunate .
• He compares life paths, stating that while people start similarly, their choices, like attending his lecture versus a protest, lead to vastly different outcomes .
• He emphasizes that immediate benefits might not be apparent, but long-term gains are significant .
• He uses an analogy of the human circulatory system to illustrate how a wrong path can lead to negative consequences, just as blood flowing incorrectly can harm the body .
• He concludes that attending his lecture offers more benefit than participating in protests .

2 (00:04:29)

• Heo Kyung-young discusses his predictions regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils, which he claims to have made four years prior .
• He also states he predicted Trump’s election one year and two months earlier, clarifying these are not mere predictions but insights from spiritual vision .
• He explains that such prophecies should not be openly discussed until they materialize .
• He reiterates his prediction that if Hillary Clinton were elected, war would break out in Korea .
• He envisions himself becoming president with 90% of the vote and unifying the world .
• He describes a scenario where initial low poll numbers for him would rise dramatically after he proposes a monthly stipend of 1.5 million won for every citizen over 20, eliminating financial worries and making all Koreans middle class .
• He asserts that people would trust him to fulfill this promise, even if it means selling state assets or acquiring funds from other countries .
• He believes this would lead to a 90% voter turnout and his election .
• He argues that current politicians only take money, while he would provide 2 billion won per person, or 8 billion won for a family of four, over their lifetime .
• He criticizes the current political system, where GNP is high but citizens struggle financially .
• He predicts that the Choi Soon-sil and Chung Yoo-ra scandal will motivate young people to vote, unlike in the past .
• He states that if he becomes president, he will lower the voting age to 14, making voting mandatory for middle schoolers by linking it to academic performance and social advancement .
• He believes this will increase overall voter turnout, as parents would bring their children to vote .
• He argues that giving voting rights to 14-year-olds would empower them to demand educational reforms, such as the abolition of private tutoring and the Suneung exam .
• He emphasizes that a 90% voter turnout and his 90% vote share would make him president .
• He envisions a strong presidential system where he would declare martial law, dismiss current National Assembly members, and elect 100 new ones to implement his policies, unlike Park Geun-hye, who was swayed by politicians .

3 (00:11:40)

• Heo Kyung-young recounts a news story about a young man who found 13 million won and reported it to the police .
• The owner, a businessman, was so moved that he added 37 million won to the recovered money and donated 50 million won to charity .
• He then shares his own experience from 7-8 years ago, finding 76 million won that fell from a moving truck .
• He chased the truck for 20 minutes to return the money, which was a family’s house deposit .
• He emphasizes the importance of respecting women, citing that households that disrespect women do not prosper .
• He connects this to the Korean flag (Taegeukgi) and the I Ching (Juyeok), explaining that the current flag’s arrangement of trigrams (heaven above, earth below) signifies national decline and conflict .
• He argues that the trigrams should be reversed (earth above, heaven below) to represent peace and harmony, known as “Jicheontae-gwae” .
• He criticizes the current flag and the name of the Blue House (Cheong Wa Dae) for bringing misfortune .
• He asserts that women should hold power in the household, as seen in traditional Korean families where grandmothers managed finances .
• He illustrates this with historical examples of queens influencing kings, even to the point of poisoning them to secure their sons’ succession .
• He concludes that disrespecting women, as in the Joseon Dynasty with multiple concubines, led to the nation’s downfall .
• He claims to have mastered the I Ching before elementary school, which guides him away from harmful paths, and he has never consumed alcohol, tobacco, coffee, or soda .
• He further explains the I Ching’s trigrams, noting that the current Taegeukgi was hastily designed by a diplomat on a ship to Japan, leading to its flawed representation .
• He suggests that the flag should be changed to reflect a more auspicious arrangement .
• He contrasts the Korean flag with Japan’s “Mugeuk” (circle) flag, which he considers more powerful as it represents the entire universe .
• He believes the Taegeukgi was designed by the Japanese to bring misfortune to Korea, causing division and weakness .
• He advises viewing things with a “Mugeuk” perspective, seeing all humans as equal, rather than judging by good or evil .
• He argues that placing women in a position of respect, as in “Jicheontae-gwae,” would bring peace to Korea .
• He connects this to the Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, and Chung Yoo-ra scandal, suggesting that while their actions were wrong, the public’s reaction was excessively harsh because they were women .
• He believes that women’s mistakes should be treated with more leniency .

4 (00:29:10)

• Heo Kyung-young refers to a video from four years ago where he discussed Park Geun-hye’s fate shortly after her election .
• He analyzes Park Geun-hye’s Saju (four pillars of destiny), noting that her birth year (Shinmyo) conflicts with 2016 (Byeongsin), indicating a difficult year .
• He predicted that Park Geun-hye would not survive 2016, suggesting it was a year of “Wonjinsal” (a type of conflict in Saju) that could even lead to war .
• He warns against excessive protests, stating that they only aid North Korea and could lead to misjudgment .
• He recounts his experience in Vietnam, where he witnessed how internal strife and spies contributed to the country’s downfall .
• He advises caution regarding protests, as they might expose people to undesirable elements .
• He emphasizes that while mistakes happen, national division over them is unnecessary, as legal processes can handle wrongdoings .
• He reiterates that Park Geun-hye’s Saju indicates a difficult 2016, but she would recover in 2017 .
• He then examines Park Jung-hee’s Saju, noting his “Insin-sa-hae” (four pillars of destiny indicating revolution) and “Sin-ja-jin Samhap” (three harmonies), which signify a powerful and formidable character .
• He points out that while many share similar Saju, their destinies differ due to factors like physiognomy and relationships .
• He concludes that Saju has a minor influence (0.1%) on destiny, with “Daeun” (major luck cycles) being more significant .
• He reiterates that Park Geun-hye’s “Daeun” was unfavorable in 2016 due to “Wonjinsal” and “Chung” (clash), leading to her downfall .
• He asserts that Park Geun-hye’s power has already diminished in the public’s mind, even if she remains in office .
• He advocates for a less confrontational approach to women’s mistakes, especially for the first female president, given her unique background .
• He believes Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution, and her actions, such as promoting cultural projects or directing economic policies, fall within her presidential authority .
• He argues that presidents have emergency economic powers and can consult trusted individuals without public disclosure .
• He criticizes the public’s outrage over Park Geun-hye’s exercise of her powers, contrasting it with the astronomical sums allegedly embezzled by previous male presidents and their families .
• He expresses sympathy for former President Lee Myung-bak and his brother, acknowledging their difficult pasts .
• He contrasts the public’s focus on Choi Soon-sil’s “skirt-wind” scandal with the much larger financial wrongdoings of past administrations .
• He questions whether any current politicians possess the leadership qualities needed to save Korea, especially compared to himself .
• He criticizes other potential presidential candidates: Ban Ki-moon (frog-like, unsuitable for Korea), Ahn Cheol-soo (goat-like, prone to sulking), and Moon Jae-in (cow-like, hardworking but exploited) .
• He mentions Lee Jae-myung, who reportedly respects Heo Kyung-young and agrees that Korea’s problem is not a lack of money but too many thieves .
• He plays a clip of Lee Jae-myung praising him .
• He reiterates his promise to use 50% of the national budget to pay off household debt, starting with those who have loans under 500 million won .
• He proposes selling state-owned enterprises and real estate to fund this debt relief .
• He argues that resolving household debt is crucial for economic recovery, as it would free up money for consumption .
• He also promises to abolish the Suneung exam and reduce school subjects, redirecting private education expenses into the economy .
• He connects Park Geun-hye’s downfall to her father, Park Jung-hee, noting that her problems in the “Year of the Monkey” (2016) coincided with his birth year, leading to symbolic events like fires at his birthplace and a market .
• He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s actions brought shame upon her parents .
• He warns that the “fire” of 2016 could engulf the entire Korean Peninsula, referencing historical events like the Byeongja Horan (Qing invasion) .
• He criticizes the public’s tendency to focus on others’ faults while ignoring their own, likening it to “Seolsanggasang” (adding insult to injury) .
• He argues that the media unfairly demonized Park Geun-hye, similar to how they misled the public about US beef safety .
• He criticizes the media for sensationalizing issues and causing harm to businesses .

5 (00:54:04)

• Heo Kyung-young shows a clip of Obama asking for questions from Korean journalists, but none come forward, leading to an awkward silence .
• A Chinese journalist eventually steps in to ask a question on behalf of Asia .
• He criticizes Korean journalists for focusing only on scandals like Choi Soon-sil’s while lacking a global perspective .
• He argues that the Choi Soon-sil scandal should be viewed macroscopically, noting that past administrations had far greater corruption involving family members, which was treated more leniently .
• He suggests that the public’s outrage over a 40-year friendship is disproportionate compared to the actions of blood relatives .
• He believes Park Geun-hye might have been unaware of her friend’s actions, as she was diligent in managing her family .
• He asserts that Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution and that the media’s portrayal is a fabrication .
• He plays another clip of Obama expressing disappointment that no Korean journalists came forward .
• He concludes that Korean media focuses on trivial matters like “catching Heo Kyung-young or Choi Soon-sil” instead of broader international issues .
• He praises Obama as a great president for honoring Sewol ferry crew member Park Ji-young and teacher Choi Hye-jung, who died saving students, with medals and commemorative stamps .
• He criticizes Korea for not similarly honoring its heroes .
• He laments that Korean men often fail to act heroically, contrasting it with the bravery of Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung .
• He states that if he becomes president, such incidents will not happen again .
• He criticizes the public for allowing a single woman’s actions to “ruin the country” and for using the Taegeukgi and the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House), which he believes are inauspicious .
• He proposes renaming Cheong Wa Dae to “Haneulgung” (Sky Palace) .
• He explains that “Blue House” (블루하우스) is associated with prisoners or laborers, while “White House” (화이트하우스) is for the wealthy .
• He emphasizes that Koreans need to be more mindful of such symbolism .
• He advocates for honoring Sewol heroes like Park Ji-young and Choi Hye-jung in textbooks and providing pensions to their families .
• He discusses macroeconomics (state-led) and microeconomics (individual-led), citing examples like Keynesian economics, Thatcher, Reagan, and Deng Xiaoping’s reforms in China .
• He criticizes Korea’s current economic situation, where household debt is rising, and interest rates are increasing, leading to a cycle of debt for citizens .
• He argues that many people participate in candlelight vigils not just for Choi Soon-sil but out of economic desperation .
• He criticizes the government’s handling of the shipping industry, which led to the collapse of Hanjin Shipping, and the slow pace of judicial processes for ordinary citizens compared to politically motivated cases .
• He points out the rapid dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party and the swift creation of the Mir and K-Sports foundations, contrasting it with the slow processing of ordinary citizens’ requests .
• He argues that the process of creating these foundations was flawed, even if no money was stolen .
• He criticizes the fabrication of meeting minutes for these foundations .
• He emphasizes that the process, not just the outcome, is crucial for public trust .
• He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s actions against the Unified Progressive Party, whose leader Lee Jung-hee had challenged her, were seen as retaliation .
• He warns against emotional responses in politics, advocating for “spiritual” leadership that can foresee the future .
• He claims to have recognized Trump as a future president despite his low standing at the time, due to his “spiritual eye” .
• He warns that if Park Geun-hye leaves office prematurely, a less capable leader might take over, leading to national ruin .
• He expresses understanding for Park Geun-hye’s decision to initiate cultural projects, given the dire economic situation and lack of domestic investment .
• He discusses “Banpojihyo” (filial piety of crows), where crows feed their parents, and “Daehyo” (great filial piety), which involves bringing honor to one’s family .
• He criticizes Park Geun-hye for bringing shame to her parents’ names, contrasting it with the ideal of “Daehyo” .
• He outlines three types of filial piety: material, emotional, and “Daehyo” (achieving success) .
• He also mentions “Saengjonjihyo” (filial piety during parents’ lifetime) and “Sahujihyo” (filial piety after death) .
• He emphasizes that true filial piety involves considering parents’ sacrifices and maintaining family harmony, which he suggests Park Geun-hye failed to do by isolating her siblings .
• He reiterates the importance of spiritual insight over emotional reactions for the future of the Korean nation .
• He warns against abusing power and emphasizes the importance of taking responsibility for one’s own negative actions .
• He discusses the story of Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya (Guan Bao Zhi Jiao), highlighting their strong friendship and Bao Shuya’s recommendation of Guan Zhong to the king despite his past flaws .
• He suggests that Park Geun-hye’s trust in Choi Soon-sil was similar, but in Korea, such trust can lead to betrayal .

6 (01:23:50)

• Heo Kyung-young introduces singer Choi Sarang, who performs a song .
• He then introduces Jung Hyung-soon, a philosophy professor from the US, who expresses his concern about the chaotic situation in Korea .
• Jung Hyung-soon initially came to support Ban Ki-moon but realized he was not suitable for Korea .
• He also met Lee Jae-myung, whose popularity had risen significantly .
• Jung Hyung-soon discovered Heo Kyung-young through online research and believes he is the leader Korea needs .
• He praises Heo Kyung-young’s extensive lectures and unique approach, comparing him to historical figures like Napoleon who emerged during times of crisis .
• He highlights Heo Kyung-young’s predictions from 25 years ago, which are now relevant .
• He discusses the “Yulgok Bill” (defense industry corruption), stating that no politician dares to fix it due to fear of assassination or imprisonment .
• He concludes that only a leader willing to sacrifice their life, like Heo Kyung-young, can solve such deep-rooted problems .
• Choi Sarang performs another song, “You Are Rich” .

7 (01:32:00)

• Heo Kyung-young reads a YouTube comment from “가나다 몬트리올” praising his wisdom and comprehensive understanding of national and international issues .
• The commenter states that other presidential candidates, including Lee Jae-myung, are far below Heo Kyung-young’s level .
• The commenter pledges to promote Heo Kyung-young among Koreans in Canada .
• He mentions recent media coverage, including an article in “International Newspaper” titled “Will a Korean Trump Emerge Next Year?” .
• He quotes Democratic Party strategist Min Byung-doo, who suggested that if a bold candidate like Heo Kyung-young doesn’t emerge, Korea’s economy will worsen .
• He plays a clip from an MBN broadcast on September 24, 2015, where he predicted Trump’s presidency, stating that Trump was the hope for America despite being the last-place candidate .
• He acknowledges that some view his promises as unrealistic or showmanship .
• He argues that an expert president like him would prevent war on the Korean Peninsula by understanding the needs of both North and South Korea .
• He suggests that a “businessman” president like Trump would be more amenable to requests .
• He warns that Hillary Clinton’s presidency could lead to war on the Korean Peninsula .
• He reiterates that he foresaw Trump’s victory a year and a half in advance, using his “spiritual eye” .
• He warns that if Park Geun-hye steps down, a less capable leader could take over, leading to national ruin and Koreans becoming subservient to China .
• He mentions an online article titled “The 19th President Predicted by a Fortune Teller Who Predicted Trump’s election” .
• The article states that no current presidential candidate is suitable and that a “quirky” figure, like Trump, will become president .
• The article concludes that Heo Kyung-young is predicted to be the 19th president .
• He acknowledges the public’s disbelief but emphasizes that seemingly impossible events are becoming reality in Korea .
• He states that he does not wish to take power by undermining others but will run in the presidential election in December .
• He refers to a “Maeil Business Newspaper” article from October 22, 2016, stating that 93% of Koreans supported Hillary Clinton .
• He asserts that only he can decide who becomes the US president and prevent nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula .
• He claims to have influenced Trump’s election and expresses his reluctance to engage in petty political battles in Korea .
• He concludes the lecture, inviting newcomers to come forward for personal healing .

8 (01:42:00)

• Heo Kyung-young demonstrates his “energy” by having a man from Geoje call out names while he tries to push his arm down .
• The man’s arm remains strong when he thinks of “Jesus” or “Buddha” but weakens when he thinks of his own name .
• He claims that only his name has this effect and that merely calling his name can improve health, while his direct touch can heal .
• He states that he is not an ordinary human but an “envoy” from above, and he dislikes organized religion but respects all faiths .
• He repeats the demonstration, showing that calling his name strengthens the man, while calling other names weakens him .
• He asserts that his photo alone has healing power, and calling his name before sleep can reverse aging and extend lifespan .
• He then performs a “diagnosis” by touching the man’s body, claiming to detect areas of weakness or illness, such as the thyroid, bronchi, and potential for stroke .
• He then “heals” the man by touching his forehead, demonstrating that the man’s arm strength is restored and consistent across all areas .
• He claims that this healing can occur even by looking at his image on a phone .
• He asserts that he is the “creator” who has come to Earth in human form, and people are blessed to meet him .
• He reiterates that he doesn’t need to be involved in religion and doesn’t require money .
• He declares the man “completely healed” and advises him to exercise .
• He then proceeds to “heal” other audience members, including women for breast cancer and joint issues .

Meeting Minutes: Heo Kyung-young’s Saturday Lecture (December 3, 2016)

Ⅰ. Meeting Overview

Category	Details
Date	December 3, 2016
Location	Not specified (Lecture Hall)
Speaker	Heo Kyung-young
Attendees	General public, including first-time attendees, a pastor, and a philosophy professor from the U.S.
Agenda	Prophecies regarding Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and candlelight vigils, Trump’s election, Heo Kyung-young’s presidential candidacy and world unification, current political and economic issues, and a demonstration of Heo Kyung-young’s “energy” healing.

Ⅱ. Meeting Discussion

• Prophecies and Spiritual Insight

  • Heo Kyung-young claimed to have predicted Park Geun-hye’s impeachment and the candlelight vigils four years prior, and Donald Trump’s election one year and two months prior .
  • He emphasized that these were not mere predictions but insights gained through “spirituality” (영성), which differs from ordinary fortune-telling .
  • He stated that such predictions should not be openly discussed until they materialize .
  • Heo Kyung-young also mentioned that if Hillary Clinton had been elected, a war on the Korean Peninsula would have been possible .

• Heo Kyung-young’s Vision for Presidency and World Unification

  • Heo Kyung-young asserted that he would be elected president with 90% of the vote, with 90% of the 50 million citizens participating in the election .
  • His initial poll numbers might be low, like Trump’s, but would rise significantly after TV debates .
  • Key policies include:
  • Monthly allowance of 1.5 million KRW to all citizens over 20 years old .
  • Elimination of financial worries, making 100% of Koreans middle class .
  • Funding for these policies would come from selling unnecessary state-owned assets and buildings .
  • He believes that voters would trust him to keep his promises, leading to a 90% election rate .
  • He argued that current politicians are draining the nation’s wealth, leaving citizens with only 3,000 USD despite a 30,000 USD GNP .
  • He predicted that the Park Geun-hye scandal and the Jung Yoo-ra incident would increase voter turnout among young people .
  • He proposed lowering the voting age to 14 to educate young people about democracy and increase overall voter turnout .
  • Upon becoming president, he plans to declare martial law, dismiss current National Assembly members, and elect 100 new ones to implement his policies effectively .
  • He envisions Korea leading world unification .

• Critique of Current Political and Social Issues

  • Gender and Leadership: Heo Kyung-young criticized the traditional Korean flag’s design, arguing that it symbolizes a patriarchal structure (heaven above, earth below) that leads to national decline and conflict, similar to marital discord . He suggested that a “Jicheontae-gwae” (지천태괘) arrangement, with the feminine principle above, would bring peace and prosperity . He linked this to the current political situation, noting that women (Park Geun-hye, Choi Soon-sil, Jung Yoo-ra) are at the center of the controversy . He argued for more leniency towards women’s mistakes compared to men’s .
  • Park Geun-hye’s impeachment: He reiterated his prediction of Park Geun-hye’s downfall in 2016 due to her “sinmyo” (신묘) birth year clashing with the “byeongsin” (병신) year (2016), creating a “wonjinsal” (원진살) . He warned against excessive protests, stating that they could inadvertently aid North Korea . He believed Park Geun-hye did not violate the constitution, but rather her close associates might have deceived her . He defended the President’s emergency economic powers and right to issue directives for national development, such as the “Cultural Enrichment Project” .
  • Critique of media and Public Reaction: He criticized the media for focusing on sensationalized, “microscopic” issues like the Choi Soon-sil scandal while neglecting “macroscopic” national and international concerns . He cited an instance where American President Obama had to ask for a Korean reporter to ask a question, but none came forward, highlighting a lack of global perspective . He also mentioned how the media distorted his own image and actions .
  • National Symbols and Names: He criticized the name “Cheong Wa Dae” (Blue House) for its association with “blue-collar” workers or prisoners, suggesting “Haneul-gung” (Sky Palace) as a more appropriate name . He also reiterated his criticism of the current Taegeukgi (Korean flag) design .
  • economic policies: He highlighted the growing household debt (1,500 trillion KRW) and rising interest rates, which he believes are stifling the economy . He argued that current politicians are not addressing these issues effectively . He proposed solving household debt by selling state-owned assets and having the government pay interest on loans .
  • Education Reform: He suggested eliminating the college entrance exam (Suneung) and allowing students to specialize in one subject, with their performance over six years determining university admission . This would reduce private tutoring expenses and stimulate the economy .
  • Seongnam Mayor Lee Jae-myung’s Endorsement: Heo Kyung-young noted that Seongnam Mayor Lee Jae-myung, a prominent political figure, publicly stated that Heo Kyung-young is the person he respects most and agreed with Heo’s assertion that “the country is not lacking money, but rather has too many thieves” .
  • Heroism and National Values: He praised the heroism of Park Ji-young, a female crew member of the Sewol ferry, and Choi Hye-jung, a teacher, who sacrificed their lives to save students . He criticized the lack of national recognition for their actions compared to the U.S. President Obama’s initiative to create commemorative medals and stamps for them .

• Heo Kyung-young’s Unique Abilities

  • He demonstrated his “energy” healing, claiming to cure illnesses and reverse aging by simply calling his name or looking at his picture .
  • He stated that he is not an ordinary human but came from “above” with unique energy .
  • He emphasized that he does not belong to any religion and does not require people to convert, only to call his name .

Ⅲ. Action Items

• Heo Kyung-young: Continue to promote his presidential candidacy and policies, emphasizing his unique spiritual insights and solutions for national problems .
• Attendees: Consider Heo Kyung-young’s perspectives on current political and social issues, and his proposed solutions for national challenges .
• media: Broaden their focus beyond “microscopic” scandals to include “macroscopic” national and international issues, as well as diverse political viewpoints .

​

서론: 인생의 갈림길, 허경영 강연의 중요성

반갑습니다. 처음 오신 분들도 환영합니다. 오늘 이 자리에 오신 분들은 상당한 복을 받으신 분들입니다. 데모 현장으로 가는 대신 이곳으로 오셨다는 것은 인생의 중요한 갈림길에서 올바른 선택을 하신 것입니다.

인생은 출발점에서는 모두 비슷해 보이지만, 시간이 흐르면 성공하는 사람과 실패하는 사람의 길이 극명하게 갈립니다. 재벌 아들이나 일반 학생이나 처음에는 비슷하지만, 어떤 길을 선택하느냐에 따라 인생의 방향이 완전히 달라집니다. 지금 데모 현장으로 가느냐, 허경영의 강의를 듣느냐에 따라 여러분의 인생길이 달라질 것입니다. 당장은 눈앞에 이익이 없어 보일지라도, 나중에는 엄청난 결과가 따를 것입니다. 젊은 시절에 공부를 게을리하면 나중에 큰 변화를 기대하기 어렵습니다. 잘못된 길로 빠지면 인생이 완전히 다른 방향으로 흘러갈 수 있습니다.

인체의 순환과 인생의 방향성
우리 몸의 오장육부처럼, 심장이 피를 만들어 간, 폐, 신장으로 순환하듯이 인생에도 올바른 순서와 방향이 있습니다. 이 순서가 거꾸로 돌아가는 사람이 있듯이, 인생의 길도 잘못된 방향으로 가는 사람이 있습니다. 위장에 음식이 들어가 에너지를 만들고, 심장이 피를 움직이게 하듯이, 인생도 올바른 에너지를 만들어내는 방향으로 가야 합니다. 오늘 토요일에 한 사람은 놀러 가고, 한 사람은 데모 현장에 가고, 또 한 사람은 허경영의 강연을 들으러 왔다면, 누가 나중에 더 잘 될지는 여러분이 잘 아실 것입니다. 오늘의 강의는 여러분에게 큰 도움이 될 것입니다.

박근혜 탄핵과 트럼프 당선 예언: 영적 통찰의 증거
오늘 강의는 시대적 상황에 맞춰 박근혜 대통령에 대한 이야기를 하겠습니다. 박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불 시위는 제가 4년 전에 이미 이야기했습니다. 트럼프 당선 또한 1년 2개월 전에 예언했습니다. 이것은 단순한 점쟁이의 예언이 아니라, 영성으로 본 것이기에 일반 사람들과는 다릅니다. 당시에는 이러한 예언을 함부로 떠들고 다니지 않았습니다. 트럼프가 당선될 때까지는 비밀로 유지해야 했습니다. 그러나 방송에서는 이미 이야기해 두었습니다. 힐러리가 당선되면 우리나라에 전쟁이 날 것이라고도 했습니다.

허경영의 대통령 당선과 세계 통일 예언
제가 대통령이 되고 세계를 통일할 것입니다. 국민 5천만 명 중 약 3,600만 명이 투표에 참여하고, 그중 90%가 투표에 임하며, 투표한 사람 중 90%의 지지로 제가 당선될 것입니다. 처음에는 여론조사에서 트럼프처럼 0.1%가 나올지 모르지만, 선거 초반에는 10%, 그 다음에는 30%, 50%로 지지율이 오를 것입니다. TV 토론에서 국민 한 사람당 월 150만 원의 배당금을 지급하고, 20세 이상 국민 통장에 매달 돈이 들어오게 하여 돈 걱정 없는 100% 중산층 국가를 만들겠다고 약속할 것입니다. 이 약속을 지킬 것이라는 믿음이 생기면 투표율 90%로 당선될 것입니다. 여야로 갈리던 표가 모두 저에게 올 것입니다. 제가 당선되지 않으면 가족 4명 기준으로 80억 원의 돈을 받지 못하게 되지만, 제가 당선되면 이 돈을 받게 됩니다. 현재 정치인들은 국민의 돈을 빼돌리고 있지만, 저는 국유지나 국가 소유의 빌딩을 팔아서라도 국민에게 돈을 돌려줄 것입니다.

투표율 90% 달성 전략: 젊은 층과 14세 투표권
박근혜 대통령 사건으로 인해 젊은 층의 투표율이 높아질 것입니다. 최순실, 정유라 사건 때문에 투표를 많이 하게 될 것입니다. 젊은이들이 총칼을 들고 혁명하는 시대, 군부가 혁명하는 시대는 지났습니다. 오직 투표로만 변화를 이끌어낼 수 있습니다. 제가 대통령이 되면 14세부터 투표권을 부여할 것입니다. 중학생이 부모님과 함께 투표장에 가서 민주주의를 배우게 하기 위함입니다. 투표를 하지 않으면 학점에 마이너스가 되고, 사회 진출에 불이익을 받을 것입니다. 이렇게 되면 부모님들이 자녀를 투표장으로 데려가게 되어 부모 투표율도 올라갈 것입니다. 14세 청소년들에게 투표권을 주면 학교에 갇혀 야자나 학원에 다니는 대신, 스스로 수능 시험을 없애고 과외를 없앨 후보에게 투표할 것입니다. 투표를 통해 민주주의를 직접 경험하게 되면 아이들의 민주주의 의식이 달라질 것입니다. 이렇게 되면 투표율 90%를 달성하고, 출마한 10명 중 제가 90%의 표를 얻어 대통령이 될 것입니다.

강력한 대통령 체제와 세계 통일
대통령이 되면 비상계엄을 선포하고 국회의원들을 정리한 후, 새로운 국회의원 100명을 뽑아 강력하게 국정을 운영할 것입니다. 300명의 국회의원에게 끌려다니다 탄핵당한 박근혜 대통령처럼 되지 않을 것입니다. 강력한 대통령으로서 세계 통일까지 우리 민족이 이룰 것입니다.

잃어버린 돈을 찾아준 젊은이와 기부 미담
최근 1,300만 원을 잃어버린 사람이 있었는데, 어떤 젊은이가 그 돈을 주워 파출소에 신고하여 주인을 찾아주었습니다. 그 돈을 찾은 사업가는 감동하여 3,700만 원을 보태 총 5천만 원을 불우이웃 돕기에 기부했습니다. 저 또한 7, 8년 전 이삿짐 트럭에서 떨어진 7,600만 원을 주워 주인에게 찾아준 적이 있습니다. 그 돈은 전세 보증금이었고, 잃어버렸다면 그 가족은 이사도 못 가고 이혼까지 당할 상황이었습니다.

태극기와 주역: 여성 존중의 중요성
우리는 여자를 무시하는 집안은 잘 되지 못합니다. 여자를 대우하는 집안은 항상 잘 됩니다. 천부경과 주역에도 여성 존중의 중요성이 나와 있습니다. 우리나라 태극기는 남편을 상징하는 하늘(건괘)이 위에 있고, 아내를 상징하는 땅(곤괘)이 아래에 있는 형국입니다. 주역에서는 이를 ‘천지비괘’라 하여 패망을 의미합니다. 남자의 기운은 위로, 음의 기운은 아래로 향하여 부부가 만날 기회가 없고, 자식도 기가 죽고 부부싸움만 하게 됩니다. 이는 나라가 망하는 징조입니다. 태극기는 ‘지천태괘’처럼 땅이 위에 있고 하늘이 아래에 있어야 태평성대가 옵니다. 땅의 기운은 내려오고 남자의 기운은 올라가 자식이 생기고 가정이 화목해집니다.

집안에서 여자를 높이고 곳간 열쇠를 주어 주도권을 쥐게 해야 합니다. 임금도 왕비가 부엌을 관리하고 무수리들을 관리하듯이, 여자가 남자의 목숨을 쥐고 있는 것과 같습니다. 남편 밥에 독약을 넣어 빨리 왕을 만들려는 왕비처럼, 여자를 잘 모셔야 남자가 잘 살 수 있습니다. 조선이 망한 것도 후궁을 많이 두어 본처가 남자를 해치는 형국이 일어났기 때문입니다. 남자가 여자를 우습게 알고 마음대로 부리니 나라가 망할 수밖에 없었습니다.

저는 초등학교 들어가기 전에 주역을 다 떼었기에 자연의 법칙을 잘 압니다. 술, 담배, 커피, 사이다, 콜라를 먹어본 적이 없습니다. 태극기는 일본으로 가는 배 안에서 외교관이 급하게 만들었기에 주역을 모르는 사람들이 잘못 만들었고, 우리는 지금까지 그대로 쓰고 있습니다. 기독교인들도 주역의 괘를 싫어합니다. 일본의 국기는 ‘무극’으로 우주 전체를 상징하여 가장 강력한 깃발입니다. 태극은 빵점입니다. 일본은 우리나라를 망하게 하려고 괴상한 태극기를 만들어 좋은 것이라고 속였습니다. 이 태극기를 자주 바라보면 재수가 없습니다. 바꿔야 합니다.

여성 대통령과 여성의 죄에 대한 관대함
우리는 사물을 바라볼 때 무극으로 보아야 합니다. 선악을 따지지 않고 모든 인간을 평등하게 보는 것입니다. 우리나라 태극기를 걸지 말라는 것이 아니라, 지천태괘처럼 여자를 앞세울 때 나라가 편안해진다는 것입니다. 박근혜 대통령, 최순실, 정유라 모두 여성입니다. 우리는 여성 문제에 좀 더 관대해야 합니다. 남자가 지은 죄와 여자가 지은 죄를 다르게 보아야 합니다. 여성이 지은 죄에 대해 지나치게 흥분하는 경향이 있습니다. 물론 잘못한 것은 아니지만, 여성의 죄에 대해서는 조금 관대해야 합니다.

박근혜 대통령 사주 분석과 탄핵 예언
제가 4년 전에 박근혜 대통령의 당선 일주일 후, 이 정권이 얼마나 갈지 물어보는 사람들에게 박근혜 대통령이 언제쯤 문제가 생길 것이라고 이야기했습니다. 박근혜 대통령의 사주는 신묘생, 경자월, 무술일, 갑인시입니다. 2016년 병신년은 신묘생과 원진살이 끼어 있어 박근혜 대통령이 2016년을 넘기기 어려울 것이라고 했습니다. 원진살은 남북 전쟁이 날 수도 있는 해입니다. 지금 북한이 오판하면 쳐들어올 수도 있습니다. 여러분이 심하게 데모를 하면 북한을 도와주는 꼴이 됩니다. 가만히 있어도 대통령은 물러나고 최순실은 감옥에 들어갈 것입니다. 감정적으로 대하면 북한을 도와주는 것이고, 오판을 불러올 수 있습니다.

월남이 망할 때 간첩이 대통령 경선 후보였고, 비서실장이 간첩이었습니다. 광화문 시위 현장에도 이상한 사람들이 있을 수 있으니 자녀들을 조심시켜야 합니다. 사람은 살면서 실수할 수 있지만, 나라를 망하게 할 만큼 싸울 필요는 없습니다. 검찰이 다 처리할 수 있습니다. 박근혜 대통령의 사주는 병신년만 넘기면 그렇게 나쁘지 않습니다. 내년에는 좀 나아질 것입니다.

박정희 대통령 사주와 혁명가의 운명
박정희 대통령의 사주는 정사생 뱀띠로, 인신사해가 있어 혁명을 하는 사람입니다. 칼을 받는 자는 살아남을 수 없는 무서운 사람입니다. 신자진 삼합이 들어있어 특이한 사주를 가지고 있습니다. 박정희 대통령과 같은 사주를 가진 사람이 20만 명 정도 있지만, 모두 대통령이 되지는 않습니다. 관상과 만나는 사람에 따라 운명이 달라집니다. 사주는 0.1% 정도의 영향만 미칩니다. 박근혜 대통령은 올해 운때가 병신년과 맞지 않아 대운이 좋지 않습니다. 원진살이 있어 충이 있으니 좋지 않다는 것입니다. 그래서 올해 우리나라 대통령 역사상 가장 치욕적인 망신을 당하고 물러나게 될 것입니다. 이미 국민들 마음속에서는 물러난 것입니다. 권력은 행사할 수 있을 때 힘이 있는 것이지, 청와대에 앉아 있다고 힘이 있는 것이 아닙니다.

여성의 잘못에 대한 관대함과 박근혜 대통령의 헌법 위반 여부
우리는 남성 위주의 사고를 버리고 여성의 잘못에 대해서는 천지비괘처럼 목숨을 걸고 싸워서는 안 됩니다. 일본과 싸운다면 그렇게 해야겠지만, 우리나라의 첫 여성 대통령이자 특이한 성장 과정을 거친 분입니다. 대통령이 부정하라고 할 사람은 아닙니다. 너무 친하다 보니 그 사람에게 자꾸 물어보고, 그 사람이 각종 정보를 이용한 것이라고 봅니다. 박근혜 대통령이 헌법을 어겼다는 견해는 문제가 있다고 봅니다. 저는 법대를 나와 헌법을 전공했기에 법률적인 것을 다 알고 있습니다. 박근혜 대통령은 헌법을 어긴 일이 없습니다. 문화융성 사업을 하라거나, 대기업에 반도체 사업을 지시하는 것은 대통령이 얼마든지 지시할 수 있는 경제 특별권을 가지고 있습니다. 화폐 변경이나 금융 실명제 같은 긴급 재정권, 긴급 명령권을 대통령은 가지고 있습니다. 측근에게 물어볼 수는 있지만, 그것이 헌법 위반은 아닙니다.

역대 대통령의 부채와 박근혜 대통령의 고뇌
역대 대통령들이 1,500조 원의 가계 부채를 만들었습니다. 제가 알고 있는 것만 해도 수백조 원입니다. 박근혜 대통령은 국가 돈을 만질 사람이 아닙니다. 역대 대통령 주변 사람들이 천문학적인 금액을 해먹었지만, 우리는 최순실 씨의 치맛바람에만 난리 법석을 떨고 있습니다. 데모 현장에 가는 것보다 이곳에 오는 것이 복을 더 받는 것입니다.

허경영 외 대권 주자들의 관상 평가
허경영이 대통령으로 나오기 전에는 우리나라를 구할 인물이 없습니다. 여야 정치인들 중에 저와 같은 관상을 가진 사람은 없습니다. 청룡상이나 황룡상은 존재하지 않습니다. 반기문 씨는 청개구리 상으로 폴짝폴짝 뛰어다니지만, 한국에는 적합하지 않습니다. 안철수 씨는 염소 상으로 잘 삐지고, 문재인 씨는 소 상으로 열심히 일하지만 결국 이용만 당할 것입니다. 이재명 성남시장은 쥐새끼 눈을 가진 이무기 상으로 용이 될 수 없습니다. 올라가려 하면 장애물이 나타나 결국 내려가게 될 것입니다. 이재명 시장은 제가 가장 존경하는 사람이라고 말하며, 나라에 돈이 없는 것이 아니라 도둑놈이 많다는 제 말에 100% 동의했습니다.

허경영의 공약: 가계 부채 해결과 교육 개혁
국가 예산의 50%를 절약하여 국민 통장에 넣어주고, 1,300조 원의 가계 부채를 해결할 것입니다. 5억 원 미만 대출을 받은 사람들의 대출금을 국가가 무상으로 상환해 줄 것입니다. 국가 소유 기업, 부동산, 쓸데없는 토지를 팔아 어려운 사람들의 가계 부채를 먼저 갚아줄 것입니다. 국민들이 은행 이자를 내는 대신 밥을 사 먹고 반찬을 사 먹으면 경기가 살아날 것입니다. 중고등학생은 한 과목만 시험 보고 수능을 없앨 것입니다. 6년간 음악 시험을 본 총합계가 5,000점이면 서울대에 갈 수 있게 할 것입니다. 수능이 없어지면 과외비가 생활비로 들어가 돈이 돌고 경제가 살아날 것입니다.

박정희 대통령과 박근혜 대통령의 운명적 연결
박정희 대통령은 원숭이 날에 태어났는데, 박근혜 대통령이 원숭이 해에 문제가 생겼습니다. 박정희 대통령 생가에 불이 나고 서문시장에 불이 나는 등 엄청난 일이 벌어졌습니다. 딸이 부모에게 효도해야 하는데, 오히려 아버지 어머니의 이름을 블랙홀로 집어넣은 셈입니다. 박근혜 대통령은 아버지의 명예를 망신시켰으니 반포지효에 반대되는 행동을 한 것입니다. 까마귀도 반포지효를 하지만, 부모의 명예를 높이는 대효는 사람이 할 수 있습니다.

세월호 참사와 여성 영웅들
세월호 침몰 당시 남자 승무원들은 모두 도망갔지만, 박지영 승무원은 학생들을 구출하다가 순직했습니다. 오바마 대통령은 박지영 승무원에게 골든 메달을 수여하고 기념 우표를 만들었지만, 우리나라는 아무것도 하지 않았습니다. 안산의 최혜정 여교사 또한 학생들을 구하다가 순직했습니다. 대한민국 남자들은 부끄럽게 생각해야 합니다. 제가 대통령이 되면 이런 일은 없을 것입니다. 박지영 승무원과 최혜정 교사를 위해 박수를 쳐줍시다. 이분들의 영웅담을 교과서에 싣고, 가족들에게 연금을 지급하며, 책으로 만들어야 합니다. 세월호 참사를 잊어서는 안 됩니다.

거시 경제와 미시 경제, 그리고 한국의 현실
거시 경제는 국가 주도 경제로, 미국이 케인스 경제를 하다가 대공황을 맞았습니다. 미시 경제는 영국의 대처 수상, 미국의 레이건, 중국의 덩샤오핑이 추진했습니다. 덩샤오핑은 하이에크를 초청하여 인민들이 농산물을 시장에서 팔게 하여 경제를 살렸습니다. 한국은 1,500조 원의 가계 부채를 만들어 놓고 금리를 올리고 있어 국민들이 이자만 내느라 허덕이고 있습니다. 정치인들은 이를 해결할 대책을 세우지 못하고 있습니다. 융자를 제한하고 이자를 올리니 국민들은 촛불 시위에 나갈 수밖에 없습니다. 최순실 때문만이 아니라, 나라 경제가 못 살겠으니 나오는 것입니다.

정치적 절차의 중요성: 통진당 해산과 재단 설립
한진해운 사태처럼 해운 불황을 내다보고도 청와대는 야당, 여당과 싸움만 하고 있었습니다. 헌재에서 통진당을 해산할 때 속도가 비정상적으로 빨랐습니다. 민주주의 국가에서는 절차를 지켜야 합니다. 재단법인을 만들 때 국가 주도로 만들면 하루 만에 되고, 국민이 만들면 두 달이 걸리는 것은 납득할 수 없습니다. 회의록도 혼자 앉아서 만들고, 돈을 빼먹은 것은 아니지만 과정이 잘못된 것입니다. 국민들은 결과보다 과정을 중요하게 생각합니다. 미르재단과 K스포츠재단을 만들 때의 속도도 엄청 빨랐습니다. 국민들이 민원을 넣으면 행방불명되거나 오래 걸리는 것과 대조적입니다.

감정적 대응의 위험성: 이성, 지성, 영성
박근혜 대통령은 이정희 의원이 TV 토론에서 자신을 독재자의 딸이라고 비난한 것을 마음에 담아두고 보복한 것으로 보입니다. 헌재에서 통진당을 없애니 박근혜 대통령도 헌재에 가게 되는 인과응보가 일어난 것입니다. 우리는 감정으로 대하면 안 됩니다. 감성은 이성의 지배를 받고, 이성은 지성의 지배를 받지만, 영성을 따라갈 수 없습니다. 21세기는 영성으로 정치를 해야 합니다. 박근혜 대통령을 보면 4년 있으면 물러날 것을, 트럼프를 보면 대통령이 될 것을 영적으로 알 수 있습니다. 영적인 눈을 가진 지도자가 지금 우리나라 정치인들 중에는 없습니다. 박근혜 대통령이 빨리 내려올수록 우리나라가 위험해집니다. 영성 있는 지도자가 없기 때문입니다.

국가 부채와 재벌의 해외 투자
박근혜 대통령도 전임자들이 도둑질해 간 곳간 때문에 억장이 무너졌을 것입니다. 산업은행이 부실하고 국가 부채 비율이 40%가 넘는 상황에서, 가계 부채는 천문학적이고 이자도 감당하기 어렵습니다. 재벌들은 한국에 재투자하지 않고 월남이나 미얀마로 공장을 옮겨 돈을 벌고 있습니다. 이런 상황에서 박근혜 대통령은 어쩔 수 없이 문화융성 사업을 시작한 것입니다. 저는 그 이유를 이해합니다.

반포지효와 관포지교: 효도와 우정의 의미
반포지효는 까마귀가 부모에게 효도하는 것처럼, 물질적 효도와 마음의 효도는 하지만, 부모의 명예를 높이는 대효는 못합니다. 박근혜 대통령은 아버지의 명예를 망신시켰으니 반포지효에 반대되는 행동을 한 것입니다. 효도의 3대 요소는 생존지효, 사후지효, 대효입니다. 부모님이 살아계실 때 물질과 마음으로 효도하고, 빨리 결혼하여 손자 손녀를 안겨드리는 것이 심효입니다. 며느리를 얻을 때도 어머니 마음에 드는 여자를 택해야 합니다. 사후지효는 부모님의 잘한 점을 생각하고 청렴했던 모습을 본받는 것입니다. 박근혜 대통령은 형제들을 못 오게 하여 국민들이 최태민 씨 쪽에서 한 것이 아니냐는 의심을 하게 만들었습니다.

관포지교는 관중과 포숙아의 우정처럼, 친구가 임금에게 도둑놈이고 질이 안 좋은 사람이라도 나라 살림을 살릴 사람이라면 추천하는 것입니다. 박근혜 대통령이 최순실을 믿었지만, 믿는 도끼에 발등 찍히는 격이 되었습니다.

허경영의 예언과 미래 지도자
저는 지금처럼 남의 발목을 잡고 올라가고 싶지 않습니다. 정정당당하게 내년 12월 대선에 나갈 것입니다. 매일경제는 한국인 93%가 힐러리를 지지했다고 보도했지만, 저는 힐러리가 되면 한반도에 핵전쟁이 가능하다고 했습니다. 전 세계 언론은 힐러리가 99% 당선된다고 했지만, 결국 트럼프가 당선되었습니다. 저는 1년 반 전에 트럼프의 당선을 내다보았습니다. 공화당 16명 후보 중 꼴찌였지만, 얼굴을 보니 대통령 상이었습니다. 영적인 눈이 있어야 합니다.

지금 우리나라 정치인들 중에는 영성 있는 지도자가 없습니다. 박근혜 대통령이 빨리 내려올수록 더 나쁜 사람이 올라갈 가능성이 많습니다. 그러면 우리나라의 젊은이들은 중국에 가서 신보살이 하게 되고, 나라는 망할 것입니다. 역술인들도 19대 대통령은 현재 거론되는 대권 주자 중에는 없다고 말하며, 괴짜로 인식된 인물이 청와대의 주인이 될 것이라고 예언했습니다. 그 인물이 바로 허경영입니다.

허경영의 치유 능력과 종교관
저는 우주 에너지를 가지고 위에서 왔기에 일반 사람들과는 다릅니다. 제 이름만 불러도 병이 좋아지고, 직접 보면 고쳐집니다. 저는 종교를 싫어합니다. 교회나 절에 가도 괜찮고, 목사님, 스님 모두 좋은 일을 하는 분들이지만, 종교 행위를 싫어합니다. 이제는 허경영만 부르면 됩니다. 제 이름만 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가고 수명이 길어집니다. 저는 암을 진단하고 고칠 수 있습니다. 뇌졸중, 중풍도 고칠 수 있습니다. 핸드폰으로 제 사진을 봐도 고쳐집니다. 저는 여론을 만든 장본인이 인간의 몸으로 대한민국에 온 것입니다. 여러분은 복 받은 것입니다. 저는 종교를 해야 할 이유가 없습니다. 돈도 받을 필요가 없습니다.

허경영이 예언한 박근혜 탄핵과 트럼프 당선은 무엇인가? 이는 영성으로 미래를 내다본 결과이며, 현재 정치인들에게는 이러한 영적인 통찰력이 부재하여 국가가 위기에 처할 수 있다는 경고입니다.

1. 허경영의 예언과 영적 통찰

• 박근혜 대통령 탄핵과 촛불 시위, 트럼프 당선을 4년, 1년 2개월 전에 예언함.
• 이는 점쟁이 예언이 아닌 영성으로 미래를 본 결과임.
• 현재 정치인들에게는 이러한 영적 통찰력이 부재함.

2. 허경영의 대통령 당선 및 정책 구상

• 국민 90%의 투표와 그중 90%의 지지로 대통령 당선 예상함.
• 국민 배당금 월 150만 원 지급으로 100% 중산층 달성 공약함.
• 가계 부채 5억 미만 대출은 국가가 상환하고, 나머지는 이자를 국가가 부담하여 해결함.
• 14세부터 투표권 부여 및 투표 불참 시 불이익으로 투표율을 높일 계획임.

3. 한국 사회 문제 진단 및 해결 방안

• 여성 존중의 중요성을 강조하며, 여성을 무시하는 사회는 망한다고 주장함.
• 태극기와 청와대 이름이 나라의 망조를 부른다고 지적하며, 변경을 주장함.
• 언론이 미시적인 시각으로 최순실 사태에만 집중하고 국제적 안목이 부족함을 비판함.
• 세월호 희생자 박지영, 최혜정 승무원의 영웅적 행동을 기려야 한다고 강조함.

4. 허경영의 초월적 능력

• 허경영의 이름을 부르거나 사진을 보면 병이 낫고, 직접 보면 고쳐짐.
• 허경영은 일반 사람과 달리 우주 에너지를 가진 존재이며, 종교 행위를 싫어함.
• 허경영을 부르면 나이가 거꾸로 가고 수명이 길어짐.

비장(脾臟)-(비(脾)-spleen, 장(臟)-organ)

위장(胃臟)-(위(胃)-stomach, 장(臟)-organ)
중앙토(中央土)-(중앙(中央)-center, 토(土)-earth)
심장(心臟)-(심(心)-heart, 장(臟)-organ)
간(肝)-(간(肝)-liver)
폐(肺)-(폐(肺)-lung)
신장(腎臟)-(신(腎)-kidney, 장(臟)-organ)
궁극적(窮極的)-(궁극(窮極)-ultimate, 적(的)-adjective suffix)
정(精)-(정(精)-essence)
기하급수적(幾何級數的)-(기하급수(幾何級數)-geometric progression, 적(的)-adjective suffix)
탄핵(彈劾)-(탄(彈)-impeach, 핵(劾)-censure)
촛불시위(촛불示威)-(촛불(촛불)-candlelight, 시위(示威)-demonstration)
당선(當選)-(당(當)-be elected, 선(選)-election)
예언(豫言)-(예(豫)-foretell, 언(言)-word)
영성(靈性)-(영(靈)-spirit, 성(性)-nature)
유권자(有權者)-(유(有)-have, 권(權)-right, 자(者)-person)
중산층(中産層)-(중산(中産)-middle class, 층(層)-layer)
국유지(國有地)-(국유(國有)-state-owned, 지(地)-land)
여야(與野)-(여(與)-ruling party, 야(野)-opposition party)
GNP(국민총생산)(國民總生産)-(국민(國民)-national, 총(總)-gross, 생산(生産)-product)
혁명(革命)-(혁(革)-change, 명(命)-mandate)
민주주의(民主主義)-(민주(民主)-democracy, 주의(主義)-ism)
학점(學點)-(학(學)-study, 점(點)-point)
마이너스(minus)-(마이너스(minus)-minus)
진출(進出)-(진(進)-advance, 출(出)-go out)
유권자(有權者)-(유(有)-have, 권(權)-right, 자(者)-person)
과외(課外)-(과(課)-lesson, 외(外)-outside)
수능(修能)-(수(修)-cultivate, 능(能)-ability)
비상계엄(非常戒嚴)-(비상(非常)-emergency, 계엄(戒嚴)-martial law)
국회의원(國會議員)-(국회(國會)-national assembly, 의원(議員)-member)
기부(寄附)-(기(寄)-donate, 부(附)-attach)
천상(天上)-(천(天)-heaven, 상(上)-above)
주도권(主導權)-(주도(主導)-leadership, 권(權)-right)
천부경(天符經)-(천부(天符)-heavenly seal, 경(經)-sutra)
주역(周易)-(주(周)-Zhou dynasty, 역(易)-change)
태극기(太極旗)-(태극(太極)-taegeuk, 기(旗)-flag)
천지비괘(天地否卦)-(천(天)-heaven, 지(地)-earth, 비(否)-stagnation, 괘(卦)-trigram)
패망(敗亡)-(패(敗)-defeat, 망(亡)-ruin)
음기운(陰氣運)-(음(陰)-yin, 기운(氣運)-energy)
지천태괘(地天泰卦)-(지(地)-earth, 천(天)-heaven, 태(泰)-peace, 괘(卦)-trigram)
권위주의(權威主義)-(권위(權威)-authority, 주의(主義)-ism)
무극(無極)-(무(無)-none, 극(極)-extreme)
선악(善惡)-(선(善)-good, 악(惡)-evil)
평등(平等)-(평(平)-equal, 등(等)-equal)
관대(寬大)-(관(寬)-generous, 대(大)-big)
사주(四柱)-(사(四)-four, 주(柱)-pillar)
원진살(元辰殺)-(원진(元辰)-original spirit, 살(殺)-kill)
대운(大運)-(대(大)-great, 운(運)-fortune)
치욕적(恥辱的)-(치욕(恥辱)-shame, 적(的)-adjective suffix)
정무수석(政務首席)-(정무(政務)-political affairs, 수석(首席)-chief secretary)

인생의 갈림길: 성공과 실패의 기로

데모 현장으로 가지 않고 이곳에 온 사람들은 복이 있는 사람들이다. 젊은 시절에는 성공하는 사람과 실패하는 사람이 비슷해 보이지만, 시간이 흐르면 그 차이는 극명해진다. 허경영 강연을 듣는 것은 당장 눈앞의 이익은 없어도 나중에는 엄청난 결과를 가져온다. 젊은 시절 잘못된 길로 가면 인생이 완전히 달라질 수 있다.

2. 인체와 에너지의 순환: 위장의 중요성
   인체의 오장육부 중 비장과 위장은 중앙토에 해당한다. 심장이 피를 만들어 간, 폐, 신장 등으로 보내는 순환 과정에서 위장은 음식과 피를 받아 에너지를 만들어낸다. 심장은 피를 움직일 뿐 에너지를 만드는 기관이 아니다. 위장이 멈추면 모든 것이 끝나는 것처럼, 인생에서도 에너지를 만드는 근본적인 활동이 중요하다.

3. 예언과 영성: 박근혜 탄핵과 트럼프 당선
   박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불 시위는 4년 전에, 트럼프 당선은 1년 2개월 전에 예언했다. 이는 단순한 점쟁이의 예언이 아니라 영성(靈性)으로 본 것이다. 영성으로 본 것은 일반적인 예측과 다르며, 함부로 떠들고 다녀서는 안 된다.

4. 허경영의 대통령 당선과 공약: 90% 투표율과 배당금
   국민의 90%가 투표에 참여하고, 그중 90%의 지지로 대통령에 당선될 것이다. 처음에는 여론조사에서 트럼프처럼 0.1%로 시작하겠지만, 선거 초반에는 10%, 이후 30%, 50%로 지지율이 상승할 것이다. TV 토론에서 국민 1인당 월 150만 원의 배당금을 지급하고, 20세 이상 국민 통장에 매달 돈이 들어오게 하여 돈 걱정 없는 100% 중산층 국가를 만들겠다고 공약할 것이다. 일본이나 미국에서 돈을 가져오거나 국유지를 팔아서라도 국민에게 배당금을 지급할 것이다. 이렇게 되면 여야로 갈리던 표가 모두 허경영에게 올 것이다. 허경영이 당선되지 않으면 가족 4명 기준으로 80억 원의 돈을 받지 못하게 되므로, 국민들은 허경영을 지지할 수밖에 없다. 현재 정치인들은 국민을 먹여 살리지 못하고 GNP는 3만 불에 달하지만, 국민은 3천 불로 버티고 이자를 내고 있다.

5. 젊은 층의 투표 참여와 14세 투표권
   박근혜 대통령 사건으로 인해 젊은 층의 투표율이 높아질 것이다. 허경영이 대통령 후보로 나오면 젊은이들은 투표의 중요성을 깨닫고 투표에 참여할 것이다. 대통령이 되면 14세부터 투표권을 부여할 것이다. 중학생이 부모와 함께 투표에 참여하여 민주주의를 배우게 하고, 투표 기록이 없으면 학점과 사회 진출에 불이익을 주어 투표율을 90%까지 끌어올릴 것이다. 14세 청소년에게 투표권을 주면 과외와 수능 시험을 없애는 후보에게 투표할 것이다.

6. 태극기와 청와대 이름의 문제점: 망조(亡兆)의 상징
   우리나라 태극기는 남편을 상징하는 하늘(건괘)이 위에 있고 아내를 상징하는 땅(곤괘)이 아래에 있는 천지비괘(天地否卦)의 형상이다. 이는 주역에서 패망(敗亡)을 의미한다. 남자의 기운은 위로, 여자의 기운은 아래로 향하여 부부간의 화합이 어렵고 자식도 귀해지며 부부싸움이 잦아진다. 태극기가 남북 싸움을 유발하는 형상이다. 반대로 땅이 위에 있고 하늘이 아래에 있는 지천태괘(地天泰卦)는 태평성대를 의미한다. 주역을 아는 사람은 현재 태극기가 나라를 망하게 하는 형상임을 알 것이다. 청와대 이름 또한 ‘푸른 기와집’이라는 뜻의 ‘청와대’는 블루하우스로, 죄수나 노동자를 상징하는 ‘블루 칼라’와 연결되어 부정적인 의미를 내포한다. 청와대는 ‘하늘궁’으로 바꿔야 한다.

7. 여성 대통령과 여성의 역할: 박근혜 대통령 탄핵 사태에 대한 관점
   박근혜 대통령, 최순실, 정유라 모두 여성이다. 여성의 잘못에 대해서는 남성이 저지른 죄보다 좀 더 관대해야 한다. 현재 국민들은 여성의 잘못에 지나치게 흥분하고 있다. 박근혜 대통령의 탄핵은 4년 전에 이미 예언했다. 박근혜 대통령이 당선된 지 일주일 만에 이 정권이 얼마나 갈지 물어봤을 때, 박근혜 대통령이 언제쯤 끝나는 문제가 생길 것이라고 이야기했다. 남성 위주의 사고를 버리고 여성의 잘못에 대해 목숨 걸고 싸워서는 안 된다.

8. 박근혜 대통령 사주 분석: 2016년의 위기
   박근혜 대통령의 사주는 신묘생(辛卯生)으로, 2016년 병신년(丙申年)과 원진살(元辰殺)이 끼어 있다. 묘신(卯申)이 원진살이므로 2016년을 넘기기 어려울 것이라고 예측했다. 원진살은 남북 전쟁이 날 수도 있는 해를 의미한다. 2016년 말쯤 박근혜 대통령에게 문제가 생길 것이라고 보았다.

9. 데모와 북한의 오판: 국가 안보의 중요성
   심한 데모는 북한을 도와주는 행위이다. 가만히 있어도 대통령은 물러나고 최순실은 감옥에 갈 것이다. 감정적으로 대응하면 북한의 오판을 불러올 수 있다. 월남이 망할 때 간첩들이 대통령과 비서실장까지 침투했던 것처럼, 광화문 시위 현장에도 이상한 사람들이 있을 수 있으니 자식들을 조심시켜야 한다. 도둑질은 할 수 있지만, 나라를 망하게 할 만큼 싸울 필요는 없다. 검찰이 최순실을 처벌할 수 있으므로 전쟁을 유발할 필요는 없다.

10. 박정희 대통령 사주와 박근혜 대통령의 운명
    박정희 대통령은 정사생(丁巳生) 뱀띠로, 사주에 인신사해(寅申巳亥)가 있어 혁명을 하는 사람이다. 신자진(申子辰) 삼합이 들어있어 특이한 사주를 가졌다. 박정희 대통령과 같은 사주를 가진 사람이 20만 명 정도 있지만, 모두 대통령이 되는 것은 아니다. 관상과 육영수 여사와의 만남 등 여러 요인이 운명을 결정한다. 사주는 0.1%의 영향을 미치며, 대운(大運)이 중요하다. 박근혜 대통령은 병신년(丙申年)에 운이 좋지 않다. 박정희 대통령이 원숭이 날에 태어났는데, 박근혜 대통령에게 원숭이 해에 문제가 생겼다. 박정희 대통령 생가에 불이 나고 서문시장에 불이 난 것은 박근혜 대통령이 아버지의 이름을 블랙홀로 집어넣은 것과 같다.

11. 여성 영웅과 남성들의 부끄러움: 세월호 사건의 교훈
    세월호 침몰 당시 남자 승무원들은 도망갔지만, 박지영 승무원은 학생들을 구출하다가 순직했다. 오바마 대통령은 박지영 승무원에게 골든 메달을 수여하고 기념 우표를 만들었지만, 우리나라는 아무것도 하지 않았다. 안산의 최혜정 교사 또한 학생들을 구하다가 순직했다. 남성들이 항상 위에 있으면 집안이 망한다는 것을 보여주는 사례이다. 대한민국 남자들은 부끄러워해야 한다. 대통령이 되면 이런 일은 없을 것이다.

12. 언론의 미시적 안목과 거시적 안목의 부재
    한국 언론은 최순실 사태와 같은 미시적인 문제에만 집중하고, 국제적인 마인드나 거시적인 안목이 부족하다. 오바마 대통령이 한국 기자들에게 질문을 요청했을 때 아무도 나서지 않고 중국 기자가 대신 질문하는 상황은 한국 언론의 문제점을 보여준다. 역대 정권에서는 대통령 아들이나 측근들이 천문학적인 금액을 챙겼지만, 국민들은 관대하게 보아주었다. 40년 된 친구가 국정을 농단한 것은 잘못이지만, 혈육이 저지른 일보다 더 크게 비난하는 것은 시기 질투에 불과하다. 대통령은 실정법을 어기지 않았으며, 경제 특별권과 긴급 재정 명령권을 가지고 있다.

13. 경제 정책의 실패와 가계 부채 문제
    우리나라는 1500조 원의 가계 부채를 만들어 놓고 금리를 올리고 있다. 이는 은행의 도산을 막기 위한 조치이지만, 국민들은 이자를 갚기 위해 또다시 융자를 받는 악순환에 빠져 있다. 정치인들은 이 문제를 해결할 대책을 세우지 못하고 있다. 가계 부채 문제로 인해 국민들이 촛불 시위에 나서는 것이다.

14. 재단 설립 과정의 문제점: 미르재단과 K스포츠재단
    한진해운 사태와 같은 해운 불황을 뻔히 내다보고 있으면서도 청와대는 야당, 여당과 싸움만 하고 있었다. 헌법재판소에서 통진당을 해산할 때의 빠른 속도나 미르재단, K스포츠재단을 국가 주도로 하루 만에 설립하는 과정은 비정상적이었다. 국민이 재단법인을 만들려면 두 달이 걸리는데, 국가 주도 재단은 하루 만에 만들어지는 것은 국민의 공분을 사는 일이다. 과정의 정당성이 중요하며, 돈을 빼돌린 것이 아니더라도 과정이 잘못되면 문제가 된다.

15. 감정과 이성, 영성의 지배: 미래 지도자의 조건
    감정적으로 대응해서는 안 된다. 감성은 이성의 지배를 받아야 하고, 이성은 영성의 지배를 받아야 한다. 21세기에는 영성으로 정치를 해야 한다. 박근혜 대통령이 4년 있으면 물러날 것이고, 트럼프가 공화당 꼴찌 후보였지만 대통령이 될 것이라는 것을 영성으로 보았다. 영적인 눈을 가진 지도자가 필요하다.

16. 전직 대통령들의 부채와 박근혜 대통령의 고뇌
    전직 대통령들이 1500조 원의 가계 부채를 만들었고, 국가 부채 비율은 40%가 넘는다. 박근혜 대통령은 도둑놈들 속에 왔다고 생각하며 억장이 무너졌을 것이다. 재벌들은 해외로 공장을 옮기고 국내 투자를 하지 않아 문화융성 사업을 시작할 수밖에 없었다. 박근혜 대통령은 이러한 상황에서 감정을 자제하지 못한 것이 문제였다.

17. 효도의 3대 요소와 박근혜 대통령의 불효
    효도의 3대 요소는 물질로 효도하는 물효(物孝), 마음으로 효도하는 심효(心孝), 그리고 입신출세하여 부모의 명예를 높이는 대효(大孝)이다. 까마귀가 부모에게 먹이를 물어다 주는 반포지효(反哺之孝)는 물효와 심효에 해당하지만, 대효는 아니다. 박근혜 대통령은 아버지의 후광으로 대통령이 되었지만, 오히려 아버지와 어머니의 명예를 실추시켰으므로 반포지효의 반대가 된다.

18. 사후지효와 부모의 가르침
    사후지효는 부모님이 돌아가신 후에 하는 효도이다. 부모의 기일 날 형제들이 모여 머리를 맞대고 부모의 잘한 점을 생각해야 한다. 박근혜 대통령은 설날에도 형제들을 만나지 않아 국민들에게 최태민 씨 쪽에서 한 것이 아니냐는 의심을 샀다. 부모의 근검절약하는 모습과 고생을 생각하며 항상 근신해야 한다.

19. 관포지교와 믿음의 배신
    관중과 포숙아의 관포지교(管鮑之交)는 두 사람의 우정을 의미한다. 포숙아가 관중을 임금에게 추천했을 때, 임금은 관중이 도둑놈이고 질이 안 좋은 사람이라고 비난했다. 그러나 포숙아는 임금에게 성인군자가 아닌 나라 살림을 살릴 일꾼을 구하는 것이라면 관중이 적격이라고 주장했다. 이는 박근혜 대통령이 최순실을 믿었던 것과 비슷하다. 그러나 믿는 도끼에 발등 찍히는 속담처럼, 박근혜 대통령은 믿었던 사람에게 배신당했다.

20. 허경영의 시대적 필요성: 기존 정치권의 한계
    기존 정치권에는 더 이상 희망이 없다. UN에서 근무했던 반기문 씨나 성남시의 이재명 시장 등 현재 거론되는 대권 주자들은 한국에 적합하지 않다. 이재명 시장은 허경영을 가장 존경하는 사람이라고 말하며, 나라에 돈이 없는 것이 아니라 도둑놈이 많다는 허경영의 주장이 100% 맞는 말이라고 했다. 허경영은 국가 예산의 50%를 절약하여 국민 통장에 넣어주고, 1300조 원의 가계 부채를 해결할 것이다. 5억 원 미만의 대출은 국가가 무상으로 상환해 주고, 쓸데없는 국유지를 팔아 국민의 빚을 정리할 것이다. 중고등학생은 한 과목만 시험 보고 수능을 없애 과외비를 절약하여 경제를 활성화할 것이다. 율곡 비리처럼 복잡한 문제를 해결하려면 죽기를 각오한 사람이 아니면 안 된다. 현재 대권 주자들은 국가를 구하겠다고 말하지만, 죽을 각오까지는 하지 않는다. 허경영은 이 시대가 요구하는 인물이다.

21. 허경영의 예언 능력과 19대 대통령 예측
    2015년 9월 24일 MBN 방송에서 트럼프가 공화당 꼴찌 후보였을 때, 허경영은 그가 미국 대통령이 될 사람이라고 예언했다. 이는 영적인 눈으로 본 것이다. 힐러리가 대통령이 되면 한반도에 전쟁이 날 것이라고 예측했지만, 전 세계 언론은 힐러리의 당선을 99% 확신했다. 그러나 결국 트럼프가 당선되었다. 역술인들도 19대 대통령은 현재 거론되는 대권 주자 중에는 없으며, 괴짜로 인식된 인물이 청와대의 주인이 될 것이라고 예언했다. 그 인물은 허경영이다.

22. 허경영의 능력: 우주 에너지와 치유
    허경영은 우주 에너지를 가지고 있으며, 일반 사람들과는 다르다. 허경영의 이름을 부르거나 사진을 보면 병이 낫고, 직접 보면 고쳐진다. 허경영은 종교를 싫어하지만, 모든 종교를 존중한다. 허경영의 이름을 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가고 수명이 길어진다. 허경영은 암이나 뇌졸중, 중풍 등 모든 병을 고칠 수 있다. 이는 최면이 아니라 실제 능력이다. 허경영은 인간의 몸으로 대한민국에 온 존재이며, 국민들은 복 받은 것이다.

허경영 강연 기록물: 시대적 통찰과 미래 비전

제1장: 인생의 길과 선택

1.1. 성공과 실패의 갈림길
인생은 출발점에서 비슷해 보이나, 시간이 흐르면 성공과 실패의 길이 명확히 갈린다. 허경영 강연을 듣는 것은 당장의 이익이 없어도 장기적으로 큰 가치를 가져온다. 젊은 시절의 선택이 인생의 방향을 결정한다.

1.2. 인체의 순환과 에너지
인체의 오장은 심장이 피를 만들어 간, 폐, 신장으로 순환시킨다. 이 피는 위장으로 들어가 음식을 소화하고 에너지를 생성한다. 심장은 피를 움직일 뿐 에너지를 만들지 않는다. 위장이 멈추면 모든 것이 끝난다.

1.3. 올바른 선택의 중요성
토요일에 허경영 강연을 들으러 온 이들은 나중에 잘 될 것이다. 강연을 듣는 것이 인생에 도움이 된다.

제2장: 예언과 통찰

2.1. 박근혜 탄핵과 트럼프 당선 예언
허경영은 박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불 시위를 4년 전 예언했다. 트럼프 당선 또한 1년 2개월 전 예언했다. 이는 단순한 점쟁이의 예언이 아닌, 영성으로 본 것이다.

2.2. 예언의 비밀 유지
이러한 예언은 함부로 떠들고 다녀서는 안 된다. 트럼프 당선 전까지는 비밀로 유지했다. 방송에서는 힐러리가 당선되면 전쟁이 날 것이라고 언급했다.

2.3. 90% 득표로 대통령 당선 예언
허경영은 5천만 국민 중 3천6백만 명의 유권자 중 90%가 투표하고, 그중 90%의 득표율로 대통령에 당선될 것이라고 예언했다. 처음에는 여론조사에서 0.1%로 시작하여 선거 초반 10%, 30%, 50%로 상승할 것이라고 했다.

제3장: 허경영의 공약과 비전

3.1. 국민 배당금 및 중산층 실현
국민 한 사람당 월 150만 원의 배당금을 지급하여 돈 걱정 없는 사회를 만들고, 대한민국 국민 100%를 중산층으로 만들겠다고 공약했다.

3.2. 재원 마련 방안
배당금 재원은 일본과 미국에서 도둑질을 해서라도, 또는 국유지 매각을 통해 마련하겠다고 밝혔다.

3.3. 90% 투표율과 당선
허경영이 당선되면 가족 4명 기준으로 80억 원을 받게 되므로, 국민들은 허경영에게 투표할 것이다. 현재 GNP 3만 불 시대에 국민은 3천 불로 버티고 있으며, 정치인들이 국민의 돈을 빼돌리고 있다고 지적했다.

3.4. 젊은 층의 투표 참여 유도
박근혜 대통령 사건(최순실, 정유라 사태)으로 젊은 층의 투표율이 높아질 것이며, 허경영이 대통령이 되면 14세부터 투표권을 부여하여 민주주의 교육을 강화하겠다고 밝혔다.

3.5. 투표율 90% 달성 방안
중학생이 투표하지 않으면 학점에 마이너스를 주고 대학 진학에 불이익을 주어 투표율을 높일 것이다. 부모들도 자녀를 투표장에 데려가면서 투표율이 상승할 것이라고 했다.

3.6. 강력한 대통령과 세계 통일
허경영은 90%의 득표율로 대통령이 되면 비상계엄을 선포하고 국회의원 수를 100명으로 줄여 강력한 국정을 운영할 것이다. 이를 통해 세계 통일까지 이루겠다고 밝혔다.

제4장: 사회 문제와 허경영의 관점

4.1. 돈 봉투 습득 사례와 기부
1300만 원을 주워 파출소에 신고한 젊은이의 사례를 언급하며, 돈을 찾은 사업가가 3700만 원을 보태 5천만 원을 기부한 미담을 소개했다.

4.2. 허경영의 돈 봉투 습득 경험
허경영 본인도 7년 전(8년 전) 이삿짐 트럭에서 떨어진 7600만 원을 주워 주인에게 돌려준 경험을 이야기했다. 이는 전세 보증금으로, 주인이 돈을 잃었으면 이혼당할 수도 있는 상황이었다.

4.3. 여성에 대한 존중
여자를 무시하는 집안은 잘 되지 않는다. 여자를 대우하는 집은 잘못된 경우가 없다. 여자를 잘 대우해야 한다고 강조했다.

4.4. 태극기의 문제점과 주역
대한민국 태극기는 주역의 ‘천지비괘’ 형상으로, 남자가 위에 있고 여자가 아래에 있어 나라가 망하는 괘라고 지적했다. ‘지천태괘’처럼 여자가 위에 있고 남자가 아래에 있어야 태평성대가 온다고 설명했다. 현재 태극기는 부부싸움과 남북 싸움을 유발하는 형상이라고 했다.

4.5. 여성의 역할과 권력
여자가 곳간 열쇠를 쥐고 집안을 주도해야 가정이 화목하다. 조선 왕조가 망한 것은 후궁을 많이 두어 본처를 무시했기 때문이라고 설명했다. 허경영은 주역을 초등학교 입학 전부터 통달했으며, 자연의 법칙을 알기에 나쁜 길로 가지 않는다고 했다. 술, 담배, 커피, 사이다, 콜라를 마셔본 적이 없다고 밝혔다.

제5장: 박근혜 대통령 탄핵 사태에 대한 견해

5.1. 여성의 죄에 대한 관대함
여성이 지은 죄에 대해서는 남성보다 관대해야 한다고 주장했다. 박근혜 대통령의 탄핵 사태에 대해 사람들이 지나치게 흥분하고 있다고 지적했다.

5.2. 박근혜 대통령 사주 분석
박근혜 대통령의 사주(신묘생)가 2016년 병신년과 원진살이 끼어 있어 2016년을 넘기기 어려울 것이라고 4년 전 예언했다. 원진살은 남북 전쟁이 날 수도 있는 해라고 설명했다.

5.3. 촛불 시위의 위험성
촛불 시위는 북한을 도와주는 행위가 될 수 있으며, 북한이 오판하여 침략할 수도 있다고 경고했다. 가만히 있어도 대통령은 물러나고 최순실은 감옥에 갈 것이라고 했다.

5.4. 박정희 대통령 사주 분석
박정희 대통령의 사주(정사생)에는 ‘인신사해’가 있어 혁명을 하는 사람의 사주라고 설명했다. 그러나 사주가 좋아도 관상과 만나는 인연에 따라 운명이 달라진다고 했다.

5.5. 박근혜 대통령의 운세와 탄핵
박근혜 대통령은 2016년 병신년에 운이 좋지 않아 역사상 가장 치욕적인 망신을 당하고 물러나게 될 것이라고 했다. 이미 국민들 마음속에서는 대통령직에서 물러난 것이나 다름없다고 했다.

5.6. 여성 대통령에 대한 관점
남성 위주의 사고를 버리고 여성의 잘못에 대해 목숨 걸고 싸워서는 안 된다고 했다.

5.7. 박근혜 대통령의 헌법 위반 여부
박근혜 대통령은 헌법을 어긴 일이 없다고 단언했다. 문화융성 사업이나 경제 특별권 행사는 대통령의 권한 범위 내에 있다고 설명했다. 측근들이 대통령을 기만했을 수는 있으나, 대통령 본인이 헌법을 어긴 것은 아니라고 했다.

5.8. 역대 대통령과 가계 부채
역대 남자 대통령들이 1500조 원의 가계 부채를 만들었으며, 박근혜 대통령은 국가 돈을 만질 사람이 아니라고 했다. 최순실 씨의 치맛바람에만 집중하는 것은 본질을 놓치는 것이라고 지적했다.

제6장: 대한민국 정치인 평가와 허경영의 대안

6.1. 현 정치인들의 한계
현재 대한민국 정치인 중 허경영과 같은 관상을 가진 인물은 없다고 했다. 반기문은 청개구리상, 안철수는 염소상, 문재인은 소상으로 평가했다.

6.2. 이재명 시장의 허경영 존경 발언
이재명 성남시장이 허경영을 가장 존경하는 사람이라고 말했으며, “나라에 돈이 없는 게 아니라 도둑놈이 많다”는 허경영의 발언이 100% 맞는 말이라고 했다.

6.3. 가계 부채 해결 방안
허경영이 대통령이 되면 5억 원 미만의 주택 대출을 국가가 무상으로 상환해 줄 것이다. 국유지 매각을 통해 재원을 마련하여 국민의 가계 부채를 해결하겠다고 했다.

6.4. 경제 활성화 및 교육 개혁
가계 부채 해결로 국민들이 소비를 늘려 경제가 활성화될 것이다. 중고등학생은 한 과목만 시험 보고 수능을 폐지하여 사교육비를 줄이고, 그 돈이 생활비로 유입되어 경제가 살아날 것이라고 했다.

제7장: 세월호 참사와 언론의 문제점

7.1. 오바마 대통령의 한국 언론 비판
오바마 대통령이 한국 언론은 최순실 사태에만 집중할 뿐, 국제적인 마인드가 없다고 비판했다.

7.2. 세월호 영웅 박지영 승무원
세월호 침몰 당시 박지영 승무원이 학생들을 구하다 순직한 영웅이라고 칭송했다. 남자 승무원들이 도망간 것과 대비되며, 남성 위주의 사고방식을 버려야 한다고 강조했다.

7.3. 오바마의 박지영 추대와 한국의 무관심
오바마 대통령은 박지영 승무원에게 골든 메달을 수여하고 기념 우표를 만들었으나, 한국은 아무것도 하지 않았다고 지적했다.

7.4. 최혜정 교사의 희생
안산의 최혜정 교사 또한 학생들을 구하다 순직한 영웅이라고 언급하며, 대한민국 남자들의 교육 방식에 문제가 있다고 했다.

7.5. 언론의 미시적 안목
한국 기자들은 최순실 사태와 같은 미시적인 문제에만 집중하고, 거시적인 안목(글로벌 마인드)이 부족하다고 비판했다.

제8장: 국가 경제와 재단 설립의 문제점

8.1. 거시 경제와 미시 경제
국가 주도 경제(거시 경제)와 시장 주도 경제(미시 경제)의 필요성을 설명했다. 중국의 등소평이 시장 경제를 도입하여 경제 성장을 이룬 사례를 언급했다.

8.2. 가계 부채와 금리 인상
한국의 1500조 원 가계 부채 문제와 금리 인상으로 인한 국민들의 고통을 지적했다. 정치인들이 이를 해결할 대책을 세우지 못하고 있다고 비판했다.

8.3. 한진해운 사태와 청와대의 무능
한진해운 사태 당시 청와대가 야당, 여당 싸움만 하며 해운 구조조정을 하지 못했다고 지적했다.

8.4. 재단 설립의 비정상적 속도
통진당 해산과 미르·K스포츠 재단 설립 과정이 비정상적으로 빨랐다고 비판했다. 국민이 만든 재단은 두 달이 걸리는데, 국가 주도 재단은 하루 만에 만들어지는 것은 납득할 수 없다고 했다.

8.5. 과정의 중요성
재단 설립 과정의 투명성과 절차가 중요하며, 국민들은 결과보다 과정을 중요하게 생각한다고 했다. 회의록을 혼자 만들고 돈을 빼먹지 않았더라도 과정이 잘못되면 문제가 된다고 지적했다.

제9장: 감정과 이성, 영성의 중요성

9.1. 감정의 지배와 영성
감정은 이성의 지배를 받아야 하며, 이성은 영성을 따라갈 수 없다고 했다. 21세기 정치는 영성으로 해야 한다고 강조했다.

9.2. 영성 있는 지도자의 부재
허경영은 박근혜 대통령의 퇴진과 트럼프 당선을 영성으로 미리 알았다고 했다. 현재 대한민국 정치인 중 영성 있는 지도자가 없다고 지적했다.

제10장: 효도와 부모의 명예

10.1. 반포지효와 대효
까마귀의 ‘반포지효’처럼 자식이 부모에게 효도해야 한다. 그러나 까마귀는 ‘대효'(입신출세하여 부모의 명예를 높이는 것)를 할 수 없다. 박근혜 대통령은 아버지의 명예를 실추시켜 반포지효의 반대가 되었다고 했다.

10.2. 효도의 3대 요소
효도의 3대 요소는 물질적 효도(물려), 마음의 효도(심여), 그리고 부모의 명예를 높이는 대효이다. 생전에 효도하는 것과 사후에 효도하는 것이 있다. 효자는 자기 어머니 마음에 드는 여자를 택한다.

10.3. 박근혜 대통령의 불효
박근혜 대통령은 부모의 청렴했던 모습을 본받지 못하고, 형제들과도 소통하지 않아 국민들에게 의심을 샀다고 했다. 이는 부모를 부관참시하는 것과 같다고 비판했다.

제11장: 관포지교와 신뢰의 문제

11.1. 관포지교의 의미
관중과 포숙아의 ‘관포지교’는 친구를 임금에게 추천하여 나라를 살리는 이야기이다. 임금이 친구의 과거를 문제 삼자, 포숙아는 성인군자가 아닌 나라를 살릴 일꾼을 구하는 것이 중요하다고 답했다.

11.2. 박근혜와 최순실의 관계
박근혜 대통령이 최순실을 믿었으나, ‘믿는 도끼에 발등 찍힌다’는 속담처럼 신뢰가 깨졌다고 했다.

제12장: 허경영에 대한 지지와 언론 보도

12.1. 허경영 강연에 대한 감동
허경영 강연은 국내외 문제에 대한 지혜와 통찰력을 보여주며, 많은 사람들에게 감동을 준다. 이재명 성남시장이 허경영을 존경한다고 발언한 것은 의미 있는 일이다.

12.2. 언론의 허경영 언급
국제신문과 코리아데일리 등 여러 언론에서 허경영을 ‘한국판 트럼프’로 언급하며, 그의 과감한 공약이 필요하다고 보도했다. 더불어민주당의 민병두 의원도 허경영과 같은 인물이 필요하다고 진단했다.

12.3. 트럼프 당선 예언과 허경영의 통찰력
허경영은 2015년 9월 MBN 방송에서 트럼프가 미국 대통령이 될 것이라고 예언했다. 당시 트럼프는 공화당 후보 중 꼴찌였으나, 허경영은 그의 얼굴을 보고 대통령 상임을 알아보았다. 힐러리가 당선되면 한반도에 전쟁이 날 것이라고 경고했다.

12.4. 역술인의 19대 대통령 예언
인터넷에 떠도는 역술인의 예언에 따르면, 현재 거론되는 대권 주자 중 19대 대통령이 될 인물은 없으며, 허경영이 청와대의 주인이 될 것이라고 했다. 이는 국민들이 기존 정치인들에게 만족하지 못하고 있음을 보여준다.

제13장: 허경영의 능력과 비전

13.1. 미국의 대통령을 결정하는 허경영
허경영은 미국의 대통령을 결정할 수 있는 유일한 인물이라고 했다. 트럼프를 대통령으로 만든 장본인이 자신이라고 주장했다.

13.2. 우주 에너지와 치유 능력
허경영은 우주 에너지를 가지고 있으며, 일반 사람들과는 다르다고 했다. 그의 이름을 부르거나 사진을 보면 병이 낫고, 직접 보면 치유된다고 했다. 이는 최면이 아닌 실제 능력이라고 강조했다.

13.3. 종교를 초월한 존재
허경영은 종교를 싫어하며, 교회나 절에 가도 괜찮고 목사님, 스님 모두 좋다고 했다. 그러나 예수님이나 석가모니의 이름 대신 허경영의 이름을 불러야 한다고 했다.

13.4. 젊어지는 능력
허경영의 이름을 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가고 수명이 길어진다고 했다.

13.5. 질병 진단 및 치료
허경영은 손을 통해 암이나 다른 질병을 진단하고 치료할 수 있다고 했다. 갑상선, 기관지, 뇌졸중 등 다양한 질병을 고칠 수 있다고 주장했다.

스크립트

아이고 반갑습니다. 처음 오셨나요? 파이팅! 우리 교수님, 저 노래 한번 더 불러야겠다. 파이팅! 입니다. 우리 목사님도 감사합니다.

아이고 반갑습니다. 아이고 어서 오세요. 아이고, 그래요. 아이고 반갑습니다.

양복을 해주세요. 반갑습니다. 앉으세요. 아이고, 데모장으로 안 가고 일로 온 사람들은 상당히 복이 있는 사람들이네.

절로 여기서 조금만 가면 다른 길인데, 여기로 왔다는 게 대단한 거예요. 그러니까 그리로 가다가 일로 왔구만. [웃음] 길이 우리가 젊을 때는 요거는 성공이고, 요거는 실패인데 이렇게 보면 출발 지점에서 두 사람이 갔잖아요. 두 사람이 이렇게 갔으면 처음에는 뭐, 이 거리가 없어요.

성공하는 사람이나 실패하는 사람이나 뭐 대학교 때나 군대 갈 때나 보면 비슷해. 재벌 아들이나 일반 학생이나, 다 비슷한데 이게 세월이 흘러가 보면 이렇게, 이렇게 돼야 안 돼요? 되죠. 그러니까 이 사람은 이 사람을 볼 수가 없어요. 이 사람은 이 사람은 까마득하게 잊어버리는 거야.

이게 한 라인에서 출발한 친구야. 집안 형편도 비슷해. 그런데 얘가 무슨 길로 가느냐? 지금 대모장으로 가느냐, 허경영한테 가서 이 강의를 한번 듣느냐? 여기에 따라서 인생의 가는 길이 달라져, 안 달라져요? 제가 여러분들은 [박수] 나를 만나러 온다는 게 당장은 호주머니 뭐 들어오는 게 없는데, 나중에는 엄청난 게 들어와. 그렇겠죠.

그러니까 당장 눈앞에 이익이 없다 해서 학생들이 젊을 때 공부를 안 해요. 공부를 해 놓으면은 그게 그냥 기하급수적으로 변화가 오는데, 열심히 고시 공부를 하고 있는 애한테 아니면 공고를 가지고 열심히 전문대학이나 공고를 가서 기술을 배우러 배우고 있느냐한테 누가 와서 바람을 넣어놨다 그러면 걔가 이상한데 빠져가지고 폐인이 돼 버려요. 처음에는 몰라요. 그러니까 젊은 시절에 이게 잘못 가버리면 우리 인생이 완전히 딴 게 됩니다.

여기에 우리가 비장과 위장이 이렇게 있으면 이게 뭐죠? 중앙토죠. 그러면은 이 실제적으로 이런 이런 이런 이런 오장으로 볼 때 이 심장이 피를 만들어서 여기는 뭐죠? 얘는 간이죠. 여기는 폐로 가야 되겠죠? 그러면 폐로 가서 피가 걸러서 여기는 어디입니까? 신장 아니겠어요? 그러면 심장에 와서 또 피를 피해서 산소를 넣고 또 심장도 거르고 또 간장으로 피가 들어가겠죠? 간장으로 들어가서 다시 심장으로 돌아가듯이 우리가 이 라인을 어떤 사람은 거꾸로 가는 사람이 있어요. 심장의 피를 이 순서대로 돌면 좋은데 심장에 피가 먼저 간으로 가고, 간에서 피로 신장으로, 심장에서 폐로 가고, 폐에서 산소를 넣어서 심장으로 간다.

이런 순서가 거꾸로 돌아가는 사람이 있다고. 그러면 이 피가 결국 마지막에는 피가 어디에 가서 일을 하죠? 여기는 위장도 피가 들어가 안 들어가요? 위장도 피가 들어가서 비위, 비장과 위장도 피가 필요한데 돌아서 이것이 궁극적으로 만들어지는 것은 뭡니까? 정을 만들어내잖아요. 그럼 이게 에너지예요. 에너지.

그러니까 이렇게 피가 도는 건 좋은데 이 위장에 음식이 들어가고 음식과 피가 들어서 들어가지 않으면 이 위장이 멈춰버리면 이걸로 다 끝나는 거죠. 그래서 위장이 만들어내는 건 근본적으로 에너지. 에너지고 심장은 피를 움직이기만 주지 심장이 에너지를 만드는 것은 아니거든요. 심장은 뭐 만들죠? 길을 만들어내지.

이와 같이 이 두 사람이 오늘 토요일 날 한 사람은 놀러 갔다 한 사람은 데모하는데 갔다 그러면 한 사람은 허경영한테 갔다 누가 나중에 잘 될까 잘 아시죠. 잘 아시니까 여러분들은 왔는데 거기 있는 사람들은 몰라요. 오늘의 강의를 듣는 게 도움이 될 겁니다. 내가 오늘 강의는 뭐, 시대가 시대만큼 박근혜에 대해서 [음악] 박근혜 대통령의 탄핵과 촛불시위를 제가 언제 이야기했죠? 4년 전에 여기 했죠.

[음악] 맞습니까? 트럼프 당선은 1년 2개월 전에 이야기했죠. 이야기했는데 이것은 그냥 예언이 아니고 점쟁이들의 예언이 아닙니다. 그냥 예언이 아니에요. 이거는 영성으로 보는 거니까 일반 사람들하고 좀 달라요.

그러나 이걸 떠들고 다니면 안 돼요. 뭐 박근혜 대통령이 4년 이게 단일이 됐으니까 내가 이야기하지. 옛날에 이런 이야기를 했지만 떠들고 다니지 않았잖아요. 그렇죠? 트럼프가 붙는다 이런 말을 떠들고 다니면 안 돼요.

내가 만들어서 트럼프가 당선할 때까지는 비밀이야. 그때까지는 누가 붙는지 모른다 이래야 돼. 그러나 방송에는 이미 내가 딱 이야기해 놨잖아. 그럼 힐러리가 붙으면 우리나라 전쟁 난다 그랬죠.

대통령이 되고 세계를 통일한다. 이게 뭐죠? 이게 뭔가? 국민이 전체 5천만 중에 국민이 한 3,600만 명 정도가 투표하죠. 유권자가 있는데 그중에 90%가 투표를 할 거 아니에요. 그래 안 그래? 90%가 투표로 임하고 투표한 사람 중에 90%로 내가 당선이 안 그래요.

우리가 처음에 여론조사에서는 트럼프처럼 0.1% 나오겠지. 처음에 그래요. 그 다음에 좀 가면 선거 초반에 가면 한 10% 조금 더 가면 30% 조금 더 가니까 50% 선거 텔레비전 나와서 내가 TV 토론을 딱 해가지고. 국민 한 사람당 배당금을 월 150만 원을 주겠다.

20살 이상 통장에 매달 돈이 들어온다. 돈 때문에 걱정하는 사람은 없다. 우리나라 사람은 100% 중산층이 된다. 그렇게 하겠어요, 안 하겠어요? 그 말을 딱 실현하겠다고 할 때 내 얼굴을 본 사람은 무조건 찍어서, 저 사람은 약속 지킬 사람이 틀림없어.

알겠습니까? 일본에 가서, 미국에 와서 도둑질을 해 봐서라도, 아니면 국유지를 쓸데없이 많이 가지고 있는 국유지를 팔아 가지고, 국가가 가지고 있는 빌딩이나 이런 걸 팔아서라도 여러분에게 다 넣어준다. 알겠죠? 그렇게 할 사람이라는 걸 딱 믿으면, 그때 투표율이 90%로 당선되겠어, 안 되겠어? [음악] 여야로 가던 표가 다 와버려, 다 와버려. 안 붙으면, 붙으면 내가 저 허경영한테 받는 돈이 20억이야. 자기 가족이 4명이면 80억이야, 죽을 때까지.

그런데 허경영이가 안 붙으면 돈만 뺏어가. 맨날 기후가 다 해외로 빼돌려. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 우리가 정치인들한테 정신 먹여 살리느라고 지금 GNP는 3만 불이 다 돼 가는데, 국민 여러분은 3천 불을 가지고 버티고 있는 거야. 그리고 이자 내고 있는 거예요.

그렇죠. 그렇기 때문에 90%가 투표를 하고. 그러니까 이번에 박근혜 대통령 사건으로 해서 젊은 애들 투표합니까, 안 합니까? 최순실, 정유라 때문에 투표하겠죠. 이 정유라 사건 때문에 투표를 많이 하게 돼요.

그리고 젊은 애들이 투표 많이 하겠죠. 옛날에는 젊은 애들이 노무현이 때만 투표했어요. 다 놀러 가버리고. 그런데 이제는 허경영이가 대통령에 나오면 젊은 애들이 투표하러 가야 되겠다는 거 깨달아서, 안 깨달았어요? 그러니까 젊은 애들이 이제 총칼 들고 혁명하는 시간이 지나서, 군부가 혁명하는 시대도 지나서.

오직 투표로, 젊은 애들의 투표로. 물론 내가 대통령 되면 14살부터 투표를 하게 해줄 거야. 왜냐하면 중학생이 엄마하고 손을 잡고 투표를 가서 해봐야 민주주의를 배우기 때문이야. 그래야 그렇지 않습니까? 그러니까 중학생이 투표를 안 하면 학점에 마이너스가 돼요.

그래서 투표한 기록이 없는 애는 대학을 못 가요. 근데 투표를 한 번만 빠지면 그 외에는 사회에 진출하는데 엄청난 마이너스가 와. 그러면 부모가 투표하러 끌고 갈까, 안 갈까? 요게 투표하러 가다가 달아날까 봐 그걸 데리고 가다 보니까 부모 투표율이 올라가, 안 올라가? 올라갑니다. 국가는 지금 14살짜리는 옛날에 24살보다도 머리가 밝아요.

개들을 유권자로 안 해주면 애들 교육이 맨날 학교에 갇혀 가지고 콘크리트에 갇혀 가지고 밤 12시까지 야자나 하고, 그게 뭡니까? 학원에 앉아 가지고 애들 만들어 놓은 거예요. 여러분들이 걔네들이 투표권을 줘야 과외를 없애주고 수능 시험 안 하는 사람한테 찍어 죽을 거 아니야. 그래, 안 그래요? 어린애들이 14살부터 투표권을 주면 자기가 투표장에 한번 딱 가보고 오면, 아, 민주주의가 저런 거구나. 우리 엄마 아빠도 거기 가서 꼼짝 못 하고 신분증 딱 내놓고 주권을 행사하는구나.

그걸 한번 딱 보고 나면은 민주주의가 달라 보여요. 애들이. 그래, 안 그래요? 그렇습니까? 그래서 투표율이 90%. 거기서 전체 출마한 사람이 10명이나도 허경영이가 거기서 표를 90% 가져온다.

맞아, 안 맞아요? 그래서 대통령이 되는데, 그 대통령이 됐을 때 그 대한민국 국민들이 아니겠지만, 역시 당선되고 나서 비상계엄 선포되고 국회의원들 다 정리하고 새로운 국회의원 100명 뽑아서 강력하게 밀고 나가는 체제가 돼요. 그렇지 않으면. 그 300명 데리고 내 공약을 배당금을 줄 수 있을까 없을까, 그러면 국민들이 그렇게 하라고 그럴까 안 하라고 그럴까? 아니, 박근혜 대통령처럼 국회의원들한테 질질 끌려다니다가 탄핵받습니까? 절대 안 그래요. 강력한 대통령으로 거듭난다, 알겠죠? 세계 통일까지 우리 민족이 한다, 알겠죠? 이게 오늘 이야기입니다.

그래서 내가 옛날에 그, 오늘 텔레비전 요새 그 이야기를 들어보니까 어떤 사람이 돈을 얼마 잃어버렸어요. 1300만 원을 현금으로 길에서 잊어버렸는데, 어떤 젊은이가 그 봉투를 주셨어요. 1300만 원짜리랑 딱 1300만 원. 그리고 그걸 가지고 파출소에 신고를 했어요.

신고해 가지고 그 사람이 이걸 찾아서 테레비전에 나왔죠. 어제, 어저께 그 돈을 찾아 가지고 거기다가 3700만 원을 보태가지고 5천만 원을 가지고 기부를 예산에서요, 힘을 했죠. 야, 우리나라에 이렇게 어려운 사람이 많은데 이 젊은이도 가난한 젊은인데 어떻게 이 돈을 나한테 찾아줬을까? 그래서 그 사람이 사업하는 사람이야. 그러다가 3,700만 원을 보태가지고 가난한 사람들한테 매번 기부하는 데다 돈을 내놨어.

그렇죠? 그 텔레비전에 나왔죠. 그러니까 이 사람이 천상 제물을 찾고 나서 감동을 받은 거야. 감동을, 감동을 받아 가지고 3,700만 원을 보태가지고 5천만 원을 사회단체 봉사자, 불우단체에다 기부해 버렸어요. 잘했죠.

내가 어디 들어갔다가 나와 가지고 몇 년 전, 7년 전이죠. 8년 전인가? 8년 전이구나. 아, 내가 어디 동네를 가니까 그 동네 트럭에 이삿짐 차가 가는데 거기서 돈 7,600만 원 떨어져 있었죠. 봉투가 땅에 툭 떨어져.

주부가 트럭을 타는데 봉투가 탁 떨어져. 왜 내가 그걸 주워서 털어버린 거야. 내가 내 차로 잡으러 갔죠. 그리고 잡으러 가니까 이 트럭 운전수가 나한테 소리 질렀죠.

“이 새끼 뭐 막 이렇게 소리를.” 망치려는 거야. 차를 가로막으니까 그것도 한 20분이나 갔어요. 많이 가서 간신히 잡았어요. “대낮에 말이야, 왜 남의 차를 가로막고 난리냐고!” 막 소리를 질러.

차에서 내려가서 봉투를, 아주 이거 떨어지지 않으니까 아주머니가 기절을 하는 거야. 그게 전세 보증금이야. 이사 가는 집에 그거 안 가져가면 이 집을 내리지도 못해요. 그러니까 운전수하고 둘이서 잘못했다고 나한테 사과하고 그 돈을 내가 확인하더라고.

돈 7,600이 맞는가 그래 안 그래요? 주는 사람이 딴 데서 더 흘려버렸는지 모르니까 확인하기가 맞는 거야. 나는 뭐 돈 금액 보지도 않고 쫓아갔지. 그래 안 그래요? 근데 그 여자는 돈을 보더니 막 그냥 돈을 확인하는 거야. 딱 맞으니까 나를 붙들고 그냥 우는 거야.

얼마나 놀랬겠어요. 그리고 자기 가족들을 그날 이사도 못 가는 거예요. 그리고 남편한테 쫓겨나서 이혼 당하는 거예요. 알겠습니까? 우리는 그렇게 실수를 한 여자를 막 윽박질러야 돼요, 안 돼요? 안 돼요.

절대 우리는 여자를, 여자를 지금 박근혜 대통령도 여자죠. 여자를 무시하는 집안은 잘 되지만 있어요, 없어요? 없어요. 여자를 대우를 잘하는 집이 잘못된 집이 있었어요? 없어요. 그러니까 여자를 대우를 왜 잘해야 되냐.

그게 우리 천부경에도 나와 있고 주역에도 나와 있어요. 우리나라 태극기가 이렇게 생겼죠? 맞죠? 이렇게 생겼죠? 이게 무슨 색깔이야. 이거는 남편이고, 이거는 하늘이고, 땅이라는 거야. 맞아? 맞아요.

이거는 남편, 하늘, 이게 근이야, 근. 이게 근인데 이 근을 여기다 해놨어. 고온을 여기다 해놓고. 그 다음에 이거는 뭐예요? [음악] 감.

여기 뭐예요? 요렇게 해놨단 말이에요. 그래 안 그래? 그러면 태극기 봉헌 여기에 있어. 그렇죠? 그럼 이거는 나라 망하는 거야. 이것이 위에 있고 여자가 밑에 있으면 이거 여자야.

이게 아내죠. 그렇죠? 이게 남편이야. 그러면 이게 여기 있으면 그냥 나라가 망해. 이게 여기 있으면 이게 위로 가야 돼.

청이 일로 가야 되고 이게 내려와야 되는 거야. 왜냐하면 지역에서 이것이 무슨 계입니까? 요것이 주역에서 이게 무슨 개죠? 천지비괘. 그러니까 이건 천이잖아. 이건 지잖아.

천지비괘는 패망이야. 패망. 패망. 망조가 남자가 위에 있으면 남자 기운을 위로 가 안 가요.

음기운은 내려와. 그러면 부부가 만날 기한 시간이 있나 없나? 이거는 위로로 내려와. 자식도 기여지고 맨날 부부싸움이야. 그리고 이게 우리나라가 태극기가 이렇게 부부싸움을 남북 싸움을 하게 만들어 놨어요.

이게 하늘에 있잖아. 이게 땅에 있잖아. 이게 뒤바뀌어야 돼. 위에가 음이 있으면.

그래서 이게 무슨 계입니까? 요거 요거 요거. [음악] 요거. 얘가 여자가 있죠. 그렇죠? 이게 이게 주역의 11번째 괴고 이게 12번째 괴예요.

맞아? 맞아요. 이거는 이거는 땅이 먼저고 그 다음 하늘이야. 그래 안 그래요? 그러면 뭐가 돼요? 태평시대가 오는 거야. 맞아 맞아.

지천태괘라 그래. 그러면 주역을 배운 사람은 이렇게 태극기를 만들면 나라가 망하는 거예요. 그러니까 우리 국민들은 청와대 이름도 망 쪽으로 들게 만들어 놓고 태극기도 망조가 들게 만들어 놓고 그러면 매일 이혼만 하고 결혼 안 하고 엄마 아빠 싸우는 거니까 자식들이 장가 안 간다 이거예요. 맨날 왜 돈 때문에 싸우는 거야.

그런데 그 아들도 직장이 없는 거야. 어떻게? 장가 우리 엄마처럼 우리 아버지처럼 맨날 싸우게 혼자 사는 거야. 그래 안 그래요? 나라 망합니다. 그래서 지천댁에 땅이 밑에 위에 있고 남자가 밑에 있을 때 땅에 기운은 내려와, 내려와.

남자 이유는 올라가, 안 올라가? 그러면 여기서 자식이 생기는 거야. 맞아, 맞아요? 그러면 가정에 화목해야 되는데 집에 가는데 남자가 막 엄청 권위주의고 여자가 잘잘잘 망해요. 알겠죠? 여자를 집안에 가면 곳간 열쇠를 줘 가지고 옛날 우리 양반들 보면 여자를 높여놔, 안 높이나요? 그리고 할아버지는 꼼짝을 못 해요. 할아버지는 제사 지낼 때마다 큰소리치지, 집에 와서 뭐 옷을 그 어머니가 다 데려주고 할머니가 모든 주도권을 지고 있어.

그러니까 나라의 임금도 그래요. 임금이 높은 거 같아도 왕비가 임금을 부엌에서 반찬, 왕비가 다 관리해야 해요. 그 무수리들, 왕은 그 무수리를 다 몰라. 근데 왕비는 무수리를 다 관리해.

야, 그 밥에다가 비상을 넣어. 그래 임금을 살살 죽여버리는 거야. 그래서 자기 아들을 빨리 왕을 만들어. 왜 뒤에 첩의 첩이는 후궁이란 애가 나이가 벌써 10살이네, 자기네가 나이가 12살이야.

이놈이 왕이 되겠다고 난리네. 그러면 임금이 빨리 죽어야지 아들이 왕이 될 거 아니야. 그래 안 그래요? 그러면 임금 밥에다가 독약을 서둘러서 말이야. 그렇지 않겠어요? 그러니까 말하자면 여자가 남자의 목숨을 쥐고 있는 거야.

그렇지 않습니까? 밥에다가 돈을 넣어놔 봐. 남편 밥 먹다가 이빨 부러지지. 그래 안 그래요? 그러니까 여자를 잘 모시면 이게 남자가 잘 사는 거야. 그러니까 후궁도 두지 말아야 되는 거예요.

맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? [박수] 그리 조선이 망한 거는 허공 때문에 망하는 거예요. 허공을 많이 두면은 본처가 이렇게 갈아 가지고 이런 형국이 일어나, 그래서 조선 왕조는 요렇게 돼 있었어. 남자가 위에 있으니까 여자를 우습게 알고, 여자를 20명, 10명 막 제 마음대로 부른 거야. 그러니까 그 나라가 안 망해요? 망하겠죠.

그래서 우리는 주역도 알아야 돼. 주역도. 나는 뭐 오만가지를 다, 우주의 모든 학문을 모르는 게 없지만, 내가 초등학교 들어가기 전에 이 주역을 다 뗐다 이 말이야. 그러니까 자연의 법칙을 전혀 아니까 나쁜 길로 가겠어, 안 가겠어요? 일제 술, 담배, 커피, 사이다, 콜라를 먹어본 적이 없습니다.

맞죠? 네. 그러니까 먹을 필요가. 땅이 이렇게 높다. 그러니까 이게 주역에 제일 처음에 나오는 거.

이게 뭡니까? 제일 처음에 나오는 거. 이런 교회가 있어요. 이런 교회나. 두 번째 나오는 주역의 개가 요런 교회가 있어요.

이런 교회는. 이런 교회는 여기 남자가 있고, 남자가 둘이 있는 형국이죠. 이건 여자가 둘이 같이 있는 행궁이죠. 이게 지역의 제일 첫 번째, 두 번째 나온 개고.

요게 11번째, 요게 12번째 나옵니다. 그 다음에 요놈이 요거 근본 감, 여감. 요게 화소 미제. 주역의 64번째, 육체의 64개거든요.

64번째 나는 하수 미제. 화수 미제의 정상적으로 돼 있어요. 요게 여자가 있죠. 안에 남자가 들어있죠.

요거는 남잔데 안에 여자가 들어있죠. 그래서 요거는 이게 위로 가면 화순 미지개가 돼버려. 이렇게 돼서 이렇게 되고, 이렇게 되고, 이렇게 되고, 이렇게, 이렇게 되면 이거는 처음에는 성하고 나중에는 망한다. 그러니까 망하는데.

요거는 바로 세워 놨어. 정상으로 해놨어요. 이거는 바깥에 음이 위에 있고 양이 밑에 있습니다. 이거는 괜찮은데.

요거는 빵점이야. 알겠죠? 그래서 정적색을 청으로 바꿔야 되고, 층을 적색으로. 바꿔야 되고, 이걸 이걸로 바꿔야 되고. 반대로 요거는 그대로 두고, 알겠죠? 그래, 이 태극기를 만들 때 팔괘를 처음에 만들었는 거야.

만들었다가, 이걸 배 안에서 일본 갈 때 대한민국 국기가 없으니까 배 안에서 외교관이 갑자기 맞는 거야. 그러니까 태극기를 잘못 만들었는데, 우리는 주역을 잘 모르니까 이걸 그대로 지금까지 쓰고 있어. 그리고 또 기독교인들이 이거 정치는 거거든. 정치는 주역이 괴 아닙니까? 괜히 기독교인들도 굉장히 싫어해.

그래서 이걸 태극기라 그래요. 태극, 태극, 태극기. 태극기 자체는 태극기 자체는 이 자체가 문제가 있단 말이야. 일본은 무극이야.

일본은 왜 무극이야? 일본은 동그라미 가지고 그냥 이거야. 맞죠? 그러니까 우주 전체가 저거야. 그래서 이 무극이 가장 깃발로 쓰는 힘이세요. 알겠죠? 태극은 빵점이야.

그래서 우리나라는 태극기 때문에 이걸 일본 애들이 아이들을 해줬는데, 어쨌든 망초가들게 만들어 놨어. 우리나라를 어떻게든 망하게. 명사한테는 괴상한 부부끼를 만들어 저게 좋은 거라고 해놓고 우리나라가 분단되고 힘을 못 쓰게 하는 게 요거야. 그래서 요걸 자주 바라보면 볼수록 재수가 없어.

알겠죠? 요거는 바꿔야 된다. 일본은 무극이야. 무극. 거기 없어.

그러니까 여러분들이 사물을 바라볼 때 무극으로 봐야 돼. 무극으로 바라보면 내가 저분을 갖다가 태극으로 말할 때는 선악을 바라보는 거야. 선하냐 악하냐? 무극으로 볼 때는 선하다 악하다 보니까 안 봐. 안 봅니까? 안 봅니다.

그렇죠. 모든 인간은 평등하게 보는 거죠. 엄마, 우리나라 태극기를 걸지 말라는 게 아니라. 지천태의 여자를 위해 앞세울 때 우리나라 이렇게 편한데.

지금 여기 잘 보세요. 박근혜 대통령 여자 맞아? 맞아요. 최순실 씨. 여자 맞아 안 맞아요? 정유라 여자 맞아.

맞아요. 여자 문제에 우리는 좀 관대해야 되는데, 남자가 진 죄하고 여자가 진 죄를 좀 다르게 봐야 돼요. 근데 여자가, 사람들이 지나치게 흥분을 하는 거야. 무슨 말인지 이해 가죠? 우리는 같은 죄를 지어도 여성이 지었을 때는 좀, 조금 관대해야 됩니다.

관대해야 되는데, 지금 보니까 여성이 침 바람으로 지은 죄에 대해서 상당히 좀 심한 거 같아. 물론 뭐 잘한 건 아닙니다. 잘못은 했는데, 그렇다는 거예요. 그래서 우리 국민이 여성의 박근혜 대통령에 대한 지금 탄핵을 하는데, 내가 4년 전에 그 영상 한번 틀어 볼래요? 내 4년 전에 박근혜에 대해서 이야기한 영상 한번 봅시다.

이게 박근혜가 당선되고 나서 일주일 있다가 한 거예요. 12월 19일 날 당선되었거든. 근데 당선되자마자 나를 불러 가지고 물어보는 거야, 이 정권이 얼마나 가냐고. 그때 내가 뭐를 하나 보세요.

사람들은 박근혜 당선에 막 정신이 없는데, 나는 박근혜가 언제쯤 끝나는 문제가 생긴다, 이거 이야기하는 거야. 그렇죠? 그런 거 여러분의 지혜로서 그게 가능할까? 잘 보세요. 잠깐요. 박근혜 사주가 신묘생이에요.

경자 월, 무술 시, 무술 일에 무술 일에 놨거든. 그러면은 갑인 시라 말이야. 갑인 시. 그러면 이 사주가 딱 당선되고 나서, 이거를 잘 보세요.

그러면 이 사람이 금년이 병신이잖아. 정유지. 정유. 그러니까 지금 이 병신년인 요거만 가지고 보면은 뭐가 문제가 있냐면, 이 신묘하고 원진살이야.

맞아, 맞아요? 묘신이 원진살이잖아. 그러니까 이 정묘가 원진살에, 이 묘가 원진살에 신을 만나서 이게 몇 년이에요? 2016년이죠. 그렇죠? 그러니까 박근혜가 2016년을 넘기기는 어렵다, 이 말이에요. 그 앞에는 괜찮아.

그러니까. 2016년 말쯤 되면은 2010년에 원진살이 끼어가지고, 원진살은 해야 그러니까 남북 전쟁이 날 수 있는 해다. 금년은 지금 북한이 오판을 하면 쳐들어올 수도 있어요. 알겠죠? 여러분들이 심하게 데모를 하면은 누굴 도와주는 거예요? 가만히 있어도 대통령은 물러나요.

가만히 있어도 최순실은 감옥에 들어갑니다. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 대한민국 국민이 그대로 놔두나? 검찰이 그대로 있나요? 그런데 괜히 감정적으로 대하면은, 감정 폭발한다고 막 떠들면 그게 누구 도와주는 거예요? 북한을 도와주는 거예요. 그러다가 오판, 어떤 사람이 오판을 할 수가 있어. 야, 이거 내려가면 전부 우리 팬들 같네.

그래, 안 그래요? 그래서 여러분들은 뭐, 나는 월남이 망할 때 월남을 가서 많은, 그때 우리나라로 탈출한 사람이에요. 그런데 그때 가서 그걸 봤잖아. 아니, 월남 티구 대통령하고 경선을 했던 사람이 간첩이야. 또 친구 대통령 비서실장이 간첩이야.

뭐 전신에. 근데 지금 여러분들이 광화문을 갔다 그러면 그 뭐 좀 이상한 사람들 만날 수 있겠어요? 그러니까 여러분들은 여러분들 자식들 조심시켜야 돼요. 어느 나라가 그걸 좋아하느냐? 우리 사람은 살면서 실수할 수 있어요. 도둑질을 할 수 있어요.

근데 나라를 말아먹을 만큼 싸울 필요는 있어, 없어요? 검찰 칼날 가지고 다 감옥 보낼 수 있어. 최순실 씨가 그거 다 재가를 봤는데 우리는 보너스까지 받아서 전쟁이 나면 돼요, 안 돼요? 그럴 필요가 없어요. 그래서 여러분이 박근혜 이 사주가 우리가 이제 병신이 해만 안 지고 그 다음에는 박근혜가 그렇게 나쁘지 않아. 알겠어요? 여기는 또 여기는 또 박근혜가 무술 무수히 와.

그래, 안 그래요? 그러니까 이 박근혜가 금년이 고야. 그런데 내년까지 가면 좀 나아져요. 근데 박정희 대통령 사주를 한번 보자고요. 정사생이에요, 뱀띠죠.

그러면 이분은 특이한 게 사주가 박근혜하고 시가 그 다음에 신해년에 나왔어요. 신의 오래 나고 경신일주예요. 그렇죠? 그 다음에 무인이에요. 무인시에 나서 이게 박정희 대통령 1917년이에요.

17년생이고. 그러면 이 박근혜 1951년 음력이고 11월 26일. 아버지는 10월 26일 돌아가셨어요. 이거는 양력이고 이거는 음력이에요.

알겠죠? 지금 아까 말한 거는 52년 이후로는 양력이고. 양력. 그러니까 이분은 토끼띠여야 되는 거예요. 양력으로는 용띠야.

그러면 이 박정희 대통령의 사주를 잘 보세요. 인신사 해 있어요. 사주에 인진 사회가 있으면 혁명을 하는 사람이에요. 혁명.

칼질이야. 워낙 크러쉬르는데 이 칼을 받는 자는 살아남을 자가 없어. 인신사에 가만히 봐요. 그러면 신자진 삼합이 들어있어요, 안 들어있어요? 삼합이 들어있죠.

이런 사람들이 특이한 사주를 가지고 있죠. 합을 가지는 사주에. 그래 이거는 서로 충이야. 그리고 이렇게 가지고 있을 때는 이 사람은 무서운 사람이야.

그러니까 우리가 그런데 박정희와 같은 사주를 가진 사람이 우리나라에 20만 명 정도 있어요. 근데 다 대통령 됐나? 안 그래요. 관상적 불효심상이야. 아무리 사주가 좋아도 이 사람과 육영수 여사가 만나는 것과 이 사주를 가지고 다른 여자를 만날 거 아니에요.

다른 사람은. 그래요. 그러니까 다 달라져 버려요. 그런데다가 또 관상이 달라 안달란이 다르니까 운명이 딴판이 되는 거야.

그러니까 사주는 0.1% 영향은 주는 거예요. 맞죠? 그 사람이 대운의 영향을 주는 거예요. 대운. 박근혜가 금년에 운때가 병신년하고는 안 맞다는 거지.

영하의 나오죠. 그래서 한 1년 양말 수도 있잖아요. 촛불 박근혜 대통령이 국회에서 법이 통과가 안 되는 거야. 그러니까 맨날 국회하고 부닥쳐.

여성이나 되니까 이렇게 되다가 박근혜 대통령이 촛불 시위가 일어나고 이러다가 가능하면 빨리 나가야 되는 거죠. 무슨지 알겠죠? 그러니까 이런 말을 그 당시 한 사람은 우리 세계에서 내 밖에 더 있습니까? 내가 박근혜 대통령 그때 사주만 보고 했을까? 영적으로 했을까요? 사주만 보고 한 게 아니에요. 사주도 이렇게 영향이 이 신묘생이라는 것이 약간 병신년에는 대운이 좀 안 좋다 이 말이에요. 알겠죠? 원진살이 있으니까 충이 있다 그러니까 안 좋다.

그러니까 금년에 우리나라 대통령의 역사상 가장 치욕적인 망신을 당하고 물러나게 되는데 대통령이 됐죠. 맞습니까? 청와대에 앉아 있지만 이미 국민들 마음속에서는 나가서 안 나갔어요. 나간 거예요. 이렇게 보는 겁니다.

알겠습니까? 권력은 행사할 수 있을 때 힘이 있는 거지 청와대에 앉아 있다고 힘이 있는 게 아니에요. 알겠죠? 그래서 그렇지만 우리는 이렇게 남성 위주의 사고를 버리고 여자의 잘못은 천집이 개처럼 여자의 잘못은 좀 우리가 그렇게 목숨을 걸고 싸워서는 되겠느냐. 맞습니까 안 맞습니까? 우리가 일본하고 싸운다면 그렇게 해야지. 알겠습니까? 그러나 우리나라의 처음으로 등장한 여성 대통령 또 그분이 성장 과정이 특이해.

거기서 특이한 친구가 있었어. 그걸 좀 뭐 대통령이 이런 말을 할 사람 아닙니다. 근데 인정해. 대통령이 부정하라고 할 사람 아니에요.

너무 친하다 보니까 그 사람에게 뭘 자꾸 물어보고 그 사람이 각종 정보를 가지고 이용한 거라고 나는 보고 이분이 박근혜 대통령이 헌법을 어겼다고 보는 견해는 어떤 검찰관이 조사를 해도 그것은 문제가 있다고 봐요. 나는 일반 사람이 아니기 때문에 나는 이미 그 법률적인 걸 다 알고 있어요. 절대 박근혜 대통령은 헌법을 어긴 일이 없다, 알겠습니까? 뭐 특검 할아버지가 해도 박근혜 대통령이 갖다 붙이면 헌법이겠다고 하겠지. 그러나 문화융성 사업을 해라, 야 LG 누워서 반도체 현대 하이닉스에도 줘라, 뭐 회사 안 했어요? 그런 걸 대통령이 얼마든지 지시할 수 있는 경제 특별권을 가지고 있어요, 경제.

알겠죠? 대통령은 갑자기 화폐 변경을 해라, 아니면 금융 신명절에 해라, 할 수 있습니까 없습니까? 누구하고 인원해야 됩니까? 안 해야 됩니까? 안 해도 돼요. 자기 측근한테 싹 물어볼 수가 있어요. 청와대 있는 사람한테 이야기하면 금방 소문이나요. 그러니까 자기가 몇 십 년 친구한테 야, 이거 금융 실명제를 하는 게 어떨까? 대통령이 물어볼 수 있어요, 없어요? 물으면 그 친구가 금융실명제가 하는 게 괜찮을 것 같은데요.

그러면 대통령이 자기 믿는 사람이니까 할 수 있는 거예요. 대통령은 경제 결정권을 긴급 재정권을 긴급 명령권을 가지고 있단 말입니다, 국가 경제에 대해서. 그거를 우리가 헌법을 어겼다, 그런 법이 세상에 어디 있습니까? 문화융성 사업 좀 하자, 재단 말도 그렇게 사업 좀 해. 너희 공장은 헤매다 다 빼돌리고 그래.

문화융성 사업도 안 하면 대한민국 실업자들 뭐라고 할 거야? 대통령 알기를 무슨 뭐 총리로 봅니까? 대통령이 그런 긴급 재정 명령권 또 뭐고 무슨 고난에서 비상기 없고 전쟁 성폭권, 대통령이 전쟁할 수 있어요? 사면권, 아무리 죽을 죄를 나오는 거예요. 그럼 대통령이 죄지은 사람 풀어줬다고 형법하겠다고 검사들이 그거 할 수 있나? 대통령이 수습권에서 야, 저 살인범들, 사형수 몽땅 풀어줘. 대통령이 그렇게 할 수 있어요? 사면권이 있는 거예요. 그런 권리를 줘놓고 그걸 행사했다고 난리들이야.

잘못한 사람은 최순실, 그 사람을 철저히 처벌을 하면 되는 거야. 대통령이 면역을 받은 정무수석이 뭐가 그렇게, 정무수석이 무슨 죽을 죄를 지었나. 여러분들은 나는 법대를 나온 사람이에요. 법대, 법을 헌법을 전공한 사람이요.

헌법을, 헌법을. 대통령이 어길 리가 있나. 측근들이 대통령을 기만하고 기망하고 뭐 그럴 수 있지. 그 대통령이 어디 우리나라 대통령이 무슨 월남 대통령입니까, 이런 사람입니까.

좋습니다. 우리 전직 대통령들이 가계부채 얼마 만들었어요? 1500조. 지금 국가에서는 1300 뭐 50조 샀는데 1500조 정도의 가계부채를 박근혜 대통령이 아닌 전직 남자 대통령들이 다 만들어서 그냥 빼먹었는데, 내가 알고 있는 것만 해도 수백조야, 수백조. 내가 누구라고 말은 안 하겠어.

그래 안 그래요? 박정희 대통령, 박근혜 대통령이 1점짜리 하나 국가 돈 만질 사람이에요? 나는 그런 사람 팬들질 않아요. 그러나 조금 여러분들이 다시 생각해 봐야 되는 거예요. 대통령 옆에, 아니 아들 세 놈이 그냥 대통령이 아버지니까 노다지 해쳐먹다가 재평하고 그래 안 그래요? 역대 대통령 뭐 형님이 또 막 해먹다가 노무현 대통령님 해보고 이명박 대통령 형님 그걸 또 회복하면 또 문제가 생겨 그래요. 뭐 그런데 나는 이명박 대통령 형님도 굉장히 훌륭한 사람이라고 생각해.

왜 동생이 공부할 때 두 형제가 힘을 앞서서 하나는 회장이 되고 현대그룹 회장이, 하나는 국회의원이 되고 그랬잖아. 그런데 그 형님도 코오롱 그룹, 무슨 그룹에 회장이. 사장했죠. 그러니까 기업의 CEO들이야.

두 형제가, 두 형제가 밥을 굶어서 이명박은 몇 번 의식이 간 사람이야. 굶어 가지고 학교 다닐 때 기절을 해가지고, 그래 안 그래요? 그렇게 리어카 장사하고 고등학교 때, 아까 몰고 다니면서 뭐 장사하고 그런 젊은 학생이었기 때문에 이명박 대통령도 그 형님도 상당히 인간적으로는 동정심이 가요. 그러나 전직 대통령 주변에 있는 사람들이 회복했겠지, 우리 앞에 있는 대통령들. 그런데 거기에는 금액이 천문학적인 거예요.

그런데 우리는 지금 한 채 누구의 최순실 씨의 치맛바람을 보고 난리 법석을 하고 앉아 있는 거야, 지금. 그러니까 거기 가는 거보다 여기 오는 게 낫죠. 거기 가서 데모하는 거보다 여기 와서 있는 게 복을 더 받는다. 알겠습니까? 나라는 이제는 허경영이가 대통령으로 나오기 전에는 여러분이 지금 박근혜 대통령 당장 내보내 놓으면 다음에 우리나라를 구할 만한 인물이 지금 대한민국에 있습니까? 지금 여야 정치인들 중에 관상이 허경영 같은 사람이 있습니까? 여야 대통령 후보들 중에 청룡상은 존재하지 않는다.

황룡상도 더군다나 없다. 알겠습니까? 그런데 미국에서 오는 누가 있죠? 또 한 사람 반기문 씨는 청개구리 상이죠. 그죠? 폴짝폴짝 뛰어다니지. 벌써 안철수 씨는 염소 상이지.

그러니까 민주당이 더불어민주당이 있으면 될 걸 나와서 삐져서 나왔죠. 그죠? 입이 나온 사람이니까 염소는 잘 삐진다. 삐지면 불러도 받아 버려. 그다음에 문재인이는 항상 문제를 일으키니까 소지소.

소는 열심히 일해주고 나중에 도살장으로 가는 거 맞아 안 맞아요? 아니, 그렇게 열심히 일해준 발톱이 딸톡으로 이러는데 그 발톱이나 뿔을 뽑아가지고 빛을 만들어. 그거까지도 다 써요, 하나도 버릴 게 없어요. 그래 안 그래요? 그러니까 철저히 이용만 당하는 거야. 문재인 잡으러 다니는 사람 하나 있잖아.

성남시장 허경영을 이재명 씨가, 허, 그 이재명 씨가 말한 거 여기 있나? 영상 좀 띄워봐. 이재명 씨가 고려대학교 강의하러 가서 자기가 제일 존경하는 사람이 허경영이고, 그분이 국가의 돈이 없는 게 아니라 도둑놈이 많다고 한 것 100% 맞는 말이다. 딱 그래요. 그 아마 한번 보자고.

이재명 시장이 지상입니다. 눈이 쥐새끼 눈이야. 아니, 상은 바로 이야기하는 거예요. 이 사람은 이무기장이에요.

이무기상이니까 용이 될 수가 없어. 올라가려고 그러면 무장해 버려. 나타나. 또 내려가.

또 올라가려면 또 장애물이 나타나. 그러니까 내려가다가 볼일 다 보는 거야. 전형적인 입지 정책으로 청년들이 따라 하려고 있는 거지. 이재명 씨가 그러니까 청년 수당을, 이재명을 떠나니까 이분이 발 꺼낸 거야.

한나라당 대표 주민의 [음악] 심판을 할 것임을 저는 경고합니다. 경고합니다. 경고합니다. 허경영 선생이라고 그러죠.

정치인들 보고 선생으로 안 합니다. 김대중만 선생이라고 그래. 맞아 안 맞아요? 근데 허경영 선생이라고 그러죠. 그래도 박수 한번 쳐 주세요.

[박수] 이제 이해가시죠? 허경영 씨를 가장 정리했는데 그분이 말했는데 나라의 돈이 없는 게 아니라 도둑놈이 많지. 국가의 예산 50% 전략에서 여러분 통장에 내준다고 그랬죠. 그 다음에 여러분들 가계부채가 1,300조인데 어떻게 없애냐? 여러분들의 가계부채를 내가 대통령이 되고 나면 신속히 없애주는데, 집을 5억짜리, 5억 미만 대출을 받은 사람은 먼저 상환해 줘요. 집이 5억짜리 미만 집에 4억을 받았던, 3억을 받았던 다 국가가 무상으로 상환해 줘.

왜 그러냐? 무슨 돈이냐? 국가가 가지고 있는 기업, 국가가 가지고 있는 부동산, 쓸데없는 토지들 다 팔아 가지고 여러분 가계부채를, 일단 어려운 사람들이 가계부채 먼저 싹 갚아 줘. 그 다음에 1,300조를 융자 받아 가지고 다 갚아주고, 우리가 못 갚은 가계부채에 대해서는 이자를 국가가 내야죠. 알겠죠? 이렇게 하면은 가계부채 문제가 해결되겠습니까? 되겠죠. 이렇게 국민의 가계 부채를 이번에 해결해 주지 않으면 우리나라는 희망이 없어.

경제가 안 살아나. 돈 벌어 가지고 맨날 은행 이자 내로 돌아다녀. 돈 빌려 가지고 이전에 장가가는 데 돈 빌려서 또 이자 내야 돼. 그러니까 결혼하는 건 내가 저 65세 이상 70만 원이죠.

국민 배당금 150만 원씩이죠. 결혼하는 사람 주택 자금 2억 주니까 돈 들어갈 일이 있습니까? 없습니까? 없어요. 그 다음에 은행 이자 허경영이가 내주죠. 5억 미만은 갚아줘.

쓸데없는 국유지를 팔아서 국민의 빚을 먼저 정리해야 국민들이 은행에 낼 돈을 가지고 밥을 사 먹어, 안 사 먹어? 반찬 사 먹으면 경기가 돌아가는, 돌아가요. 그런데다가 중고등학생 한 과목만 시험 보고 수능이 없어져. 알겠죠? 6년간 음악 잘하는 사람 음악 시험을 6년간 본 걸 총합계가 5,000점이다. 그러면 서울대학이야.

그러니까 수능 시험이 없어지니까 애들 과연이가 학원으로 가는 돈이 생활비로 들어가, 안 들어가요? 그러면 돈이 도는 거야. 그러면 경제가 살아나. 그러니까 국민들이 살판이 나는 거야. 살판이 맞습니까? [박수] 자.

[박수] 그러면 2006년 16년 1월 30일 허경영 1010 박정희 대통령이 원숭이 날에 태어났지. 여기 봐요. 박정희. 대통령이 딸내미가 실제를 정사생이야, 정 사장인데 이 원숭이 날에 나왔어요.

그런데 딸내미가 맞아, 맞아요. 알겠죠? 그게 자기 딸이 이 경신을 내가 설 때 잘못 써서 이게 맞아요. 경신, 원숭이. 이 박정희 대통령이 원숭이 날에 났는데, 박근혜 대통령이 원숭이에 문제가 생기는 거야.

그러면서 박정희 대통령하고 충핵을, 박정희 대통령 생가에 불이 나왔나요? 불이 나죠. 서문시장에 불이 나죠. 그러니까 엄청난 일이 벌어지는 거야. 이게 딸이 부모에게 효도를 해야 될 텐데, 그냥 아버지 어머니 이름을 블랙홀로 집어넣어 버린 거예요.

무슨 말인지 알죠? 그래도 뭐 그분이 버티고는 있지만은, 미국 웬만하면 못 버티는 일이에요. 그러니까 너무 우리가 그럴싸하면 문제가 있는 거예요. 알겠습니까? 자, 그러니까 그 이야기를 하고 있네. 이야기해 봐요.

그게 자기 딸이 대통령이 돼 가지고 물러나는 애가 원숭이에요. 박정희가 태어난 날과 이게 가장 병신일지, 그렇죠? 여기는 경신이지만 병신이지. 그래서 불은 이 물은 일반 불이 아닙니다. 이 불은 한반도 전역이 감돌 수 있는 병신년이에요.

병자호란 아시죠? 이 병자가 왔잖아. 그리고 여러분들은 허경영 말을 잘 들어야 돼. 그러니까 우리가 우리나라 말 중에 우리나라 말 중에 이게 눈 설자입니다. 그렇죠? 눈 위에 눈 위에 뭐죠? 뭐가 있는 거죠? 아니, 눈이 와 있는데 그 위에 소리가 덮어버리면 자동차 그냥 미끄러져 버려요.

그래 안 그래요? 설상가상격이라. 그러니까 내가 잘못한 거는 생각을 하고 남의 것만 세력 공경하는 거야. 남의 것만. 남의 것만 공경이 공격하는 이 공격수가 있잖아요.

공격. 남의 것만 공격하는 거예요. 공격. 그러니까 설상가상이 돼 버리는 거지.

눈이 와 있는데 안 그래도 최순실. 때문에 골치 아파 죽겠는데, 아예 그냥 자리에서 그냥 내려오라는 거야. 헌법을 어겼다는 거예요. 그렇지 않습니까? 친구한테 배신감도 있지만은, 박근혜 대통령이 그렇게까지 그런 짓을 했는지는 몰랐는데, 마치 그걸 알고 있었는데 위에서 교사한 거 마냥 이렇게 언론이 매도하는 거예요.

그리고 국민들은 미국산 소고기 먹으면 머리가 구멍이 나서 죽는 줄 아는 거야. 전부 촛불 들고 나갔는데, 미국산 소고기가 한국산 한우 고기보다 한우는 가장 놓고 먹여요. 가장 갖고 먹이니까 맨날 마이신 주사 맞아야 돼. 미국산 소고기는 방목을 해안에 초원에 덜 넓은 초원에 뭉게구름 보면서 구름도 없는 그 매연도 없고 황사도 없는 데서 편안하게 살아온 살아요.

그러다가 죽는 것도 깨끗하게 정지충격으로 마빡을 때려 가지고 그냥 죽이는 거야. 그러니까 소고기가 경련을 일으키면서 소원 몸에 독이 들어가 안 들어가. 그래가지고 우리가 한국산 소고기는 먹으면 살고 미국 고기는 보면 죽는다 이래가지고 난리가 나서 촛불 나와 가지고. 그러니까 우리는 이 언론이 뭐 하나만 살짝 잘못해 버리면 그냥 수많은 기업이 망하는 거예요.

그렇지 않습니까? 아니 뭐 우리가 미국 거 팔아주는 건 안 좋은 거지만 그래도 거짓말을 해서는 안 된다 이 말이야. 거짓말을 있는 그대로 해야지. 그와 같이 뭐든지 촛불만 나왔다면 문제야. 오바마가 이 잠깐 보세요.

한국 기자들에게 질문을 하나 드리고 싶군요. 정말 훌륭한 개최국 역할을 해주셨으니까요. 이렇게 지금 이야기 하잖아요. 오바마가 한국 기자들이 여기 아무도 잘해서 안 일어나요.

한국 기자가 제일 먼저 해주세요 하니까 아무도 아니라. 왜 어색한 침묵이 흐릅니다. 아무도 안 나와. 한국 기자들은 그러니까 한국으로 질문하면 통행이 필요한 겁니다.

그런데 이때 중국 사람이 일어나는데, 중국 기자가 “내가 한국 사람을 대신해서 인터뷰를 하겠습니다” 이래요. 이게 뭡니까? 실망시켜드릴 죄송하지만 저는 중국 기자입니다. 제가 아시아를 대표해서 질문해도 될까요? 이게 뭡니까? 그리고 우리나라 기자들은 그저 최순실 잡는 데는 그냥 있는 건 잘 끄집어내요. 허경영을 뒤집어씌우는 데는 뭐 그것이 알고 싶다 해서 막 노다지 만들어 가지고 막 덮으시고, 내가 부실을 안 만났다는 거야.

부시 만난 건 나중에 알려졌어요. 사실이에요. 그런 거를 조작가가 전 국민이가 사기 친 걸로 이렇게 내가 나중에 보니까 홍보가 돼 있어. 그 내가 얼마나 억울합니까? 그래도 나는 말 안 해.

왜 한국 언론이 그런 언론들이니까 당연하지. 그러니까 지금 오바마가 한국 기자 없습니까? 좀 나와주세요. 시간은 한참 줘도 아무도 안 남아. 그러니까 중국 기자가 나와 가지고 내가 한국을 대신해서 인터뷰 좀 하면 안 되겠습니까? 이래요.

그러면 이 우리나라의 위상은, 우리나라 사람은 그저 여자들 한국 정치인들 잘못한 거 뭐 요런 거는 나보다 하면서 국제적인 마인드, 우리가 다른 말로 하면 글로벌 마인드죠. 국제 다른 말로 하면 글로벌 마인드인데 무슨 말이냐면 이런 게 없는 거야. 거시적인 안목이 없어요. 거시적인 안목이 있어야 되는데 우리 한국 기자들은 뭐요? 미시적인 안목으로 보는 거야.

지금 우리가 최순실 사태를 바라보는 것도 거시적으로 바라봐야 돼요. 거시적으로 역대 정권에는 대통령 아들, 대통령 본인, 전두환, 노태우 대통령의 최측근들이 왕창왕창 챙겨서 맞아, 맞아요. 아주 관대하게 봐주더라고. 관대하게.

대한민국 국민들이 그런데 40년 된 친구가 챙긴 거는 처음이야, 맞아 안 맞아요? 40년 된 친구가 자기 몸처럼 대해 준 거, 그거 왜 시기 질투를 그렇게 하니? 그걸 좀 잘못한 게 있지, 맞아 맞아요. 그 국정을 농단한 것 인정한다 이 말이야. 하지만 여태까지 친 혈육들이 해보는 것보다 친구가 한 거니까 대통령이 모를 수 있어요. 그래 안 그래? 혈육 단속은 철저히 했는데 친구 단속을 못한 거지.

그게 대통령이 잘못한 거지. 대통령이 실정법을 어겼다, 계획적으로 “야, 너 이거 돈 내시고 보니까 다 해봐야 돈 내시고 그거 챙겨라” 이렇게 대통령이 비서들한테 이야기할 사람입니까? 나는 우리나라가 큰일 났어. 뭘 조작을 해도 이만저만하게 조작해야지. 나는 대한민국의 국민 전체가 내 욕을 해도 눈 똑바로 뜨고 안 해요.

[음악] [박수] 말은 바로 해야지, 말은 바로 해야 되는 거야. 이런 미시적인 영어를 잘하잖아. 안타깝게도 [음악] 한국 기자가 아니었습니다. 저는 한국 기자에게 질문을 요청했어요.

딱 이러잖아요. 일이 커집니다. 한국 기자들은 뭘 하고 있는 걸까요? 안 나와요. 계속 물어봐요.

근데 여기 한국 기자가 몇 십 명이 있는 거야. 참 난감합니다. 중국 기자에게 넘어갔습니다. 자, 이제 끊어요.

자, 무슨 말인지 이해가죠? 허경영을 잡거나 제수씨를 잡는 데는 죽기에 살기로 하는데 이 사람들이 오바마가 한국의 언론을 뭐라고 그러죠? 한국의 언론은 최순실 하나만 이야기할 줄 알지, 다른 거는 전혀 모른다는 거야. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 이거는 우리가 상당히 생각해 볼 문제입니다. 그래서 오바마가 미국 역사상 아주 훌륭한 대통령이야. 이 오바마가 잘한 것이 뭐냐면 세월호가 침몰했는데 그 세월 안에서 승무원 여자 하나가 남자들은 선장부터 싹 옷 변장해가지고 바가 있고 성경처럼 위장에 다 도망갔죠.

거기서 여자 승무원 이름이 뭐예요? 박지영. 나도 오래돼서 그 박정희라는 여자가 학생들을 전부 구출해 내면서 자기는 안 나가고 거기서 죽었어요. 박성호. [박수] 학생들을 바깥으로 나가라고 막 그냥 나오지 말라고 그러는데도 학생들은 막 내보내다가 조금이라도 더 내보내려고 하다가 죽어서 안 죽었어요.

자기는 순직해서 죽었습니다. 박지영 승무원. 근데 남자 승무원은 한 놈도 없이 다 도망가버린 거야. 그게 여러분, 남자들이 부끄럽게 생각해야 돼.

그래서 내가 여자들을 남자가 항상 위에가 있으면 집안 망한다는 거야. 알겠습니까? 박지영 승무원을 오바마가 뭘 줬어요? 골든 메달을 줘서 골든 메달, 골드 메달을 수여하고 한국의 세계의 영웅으로 추대해서 그리고 뭘 만들었어요? 기념 우표를 만들었어요. 박지영 기념 우표를 만들었다. 근데 우리나라는 그거 만들어 놔? 안 만들었나? 기념 메달도 안 주고 영웅 심어도 안 줘.

미국의 대통령이 이걸 지시했어. 그래가지고 또 하나 있죠. 여자, 여자한테 교사. 안산에 그 교사.

나는 최정, 최혜정이라는 여교사는 학생들을 전부 밖으로 나가라고 하다가 한 명이라도 더 내보내려다가 주고 안 죽어요. 그게 여러분들이에요. 대한민국 남자들 교육을 어떻게 시킨 거예요? 이제 내가 대통령 되면 그런 일은 없을 겁니다. 맞죠? 맞습니까? 자, 우리가 이 최혜정 이분과 박지영을 위해서 박수를 한번 쳐줍시다.

[박수] 기념 우표와 기념 메달은 최정도 주고 우표도 두 사람 다 오바마가 만들어서 그 훌륭한 대통령은 맞아, 안 맞아요? 근데 오바마가 한국 사람 이야기 좀 하라니까 당신 우리 박지영과 최정을 이렇게 이렇게 해줘서 고맙소, 뭐 이런 인사도 좀 할 수 있잖아. 안 하는 거야, 안 나가. 오직 한국 국민들 펌프질해서 바람 넣고 가지고, 김정은이 쳐들어오기 좋게 하느라고 바쁜 거야, 지금. [음악] 그 여자 하나 때문에 나라를 말아 먹으려고 하는 거예요.

여자 하나의 지혜는 검찰에서 엄격하게 처분하면 되는 거야. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 그렇습니까? 이런 태극기를 가지고 우리가 지금 나라를 이끌어가고, 청와대 이름을 무슨 푸른 기와집이라고요? 이게 이게 뭡니까? 이게 안 되는 거예요. 청와대는 하늘궁이에요. 하늘궁.

한민족의 한민족에 뭐가 들어 있어요? 한민족의 어린이가 들어있는 궁이야. 하늘궁. 그리고 한글로 쓸 때는 하늘공. 스무디에.

맞아, 맞아요? 오늘 KBS 아침 뉴스입니다. 오늘 하늘궁에서 허경영 대통령이 뭐 재밌잖아요. 이렇게 하늘궁이라고 해요. 아니, 자기 집 마당에 푸른 정자집 만들어 놓으면 청와대요? 맞아, 안 맞아요? 푸른기와집.

이거 집 대자입니다. 그러면 누구나 집에 청와대 만들어 놓으면 되겠네. 그럼 이름이 너무 흔해져서. 그리고 청와대는 블루하우스야.

블루하우스는 미국은 화이트 하우스예요. 이거는 화이트 칼라는 뭐야? 화이트 컬러는 부자들이야. 블루 칼라는 교도소 죄수들. 그래, 안 그래요? 아니면 노동자들.

블루 칼라를 어디다 입히냐면 죄수들한테 입혀. 죄수들을 우리가 블루 칼라를 하려고 그래. 근데 우리가 블루 하우스를 만들어 놓고 있으니 되겠습니까? 태극기도 영원히 만들어 놓고. 그러니까 여러분들은 한민족은 정신 차려야 돼.

맞죠? 그래서 우리가 세월호의 박지영이나 최혜정 이런 분들을 우리가 굉장히 앞으로 여기에 대해서 우리가 깊이 생각하고 교과서에 집어넣어 가지고 최후에까지 한 거에 대해서 하고, 이분들의 가족들에게는 연금을 주고 이분들의 영웅담을 우리가 책으로 만들어야 돼요. 알겠습니까? 그래서 세월호를 우리가 금방 잊어버리면 안 됩니다. 절대. 거시 경제, 이거는 국가 주도 경제에요.

국가 주도 경제. 이게 미국이 케인스 경제를 가지고 하다가 뭘 만났죠? 대공황을 맞았어요. 미시 경제인데 누가 했죠? 영국의 대처 수상. 알겠죠? 미국의 레이건, 중국의 등소평이 1978년에 등소평이가 하이에커를 북경으로 초대했어요.

우리 인민들을 어떻게 가나안을 벗어날 수 있느냐? 자, 그러니까 인민들이 밭에서 농사진 거는 절대 앞으로 공출을 하지 말고, 그것을 시장에서 팔게 해라. 그래 각자 그걸 가지고 쓰게 해라. 그러면 경제가 살아난다 그랬더니 그걸 시행해야 안 해요? 그게 수정 자본주의야. 그러고 나서부터 중국이 잘 살기 시작한 거야.

알겠습니까? 중국 경제가 일어나서. 그런데 이렇게 거시가 필요할 때도 있고, 미시가 필요할 때도 있습니다. 경제는. 그런데 한국은 1500조 가계 부채를 만들어 놓고, 가계 부채를 만들어 놓고 금리를 2%, 3%에서 5%로 지금 올리고 있어요.

그러면서 이 가계 부채를, 부채가 급증해 가고 있으니까 은행에 가계 부채가 급증하니까 은행이 도산할 수가 있겠다 해가지고 금리를 해서 융자를 제재하고 있어요. 그러면은 이자를 올려버리고 융자를 제재하면 이자를 받아서 다시 이자를 내고, 이자를 이용 잡아서 또 이자 내고 이런 형국으로 지금 우리 국민이 끌려가고 있어. 이 국민을 지금 정치인들이 이거 해결해 주려고 대책을 세워서 깔 세웠을까? 그러면 융자를 못 받을 거야. 맞습니까? 안 맞습니까? 그리고 사업장 번호 없어서 융자해 주지 마라, 그거 전부 생활비로 융자 받는 거야.

은행 이자 내려고 받는 거야. 이래 가지고 융자를 까다롭게 제한해요. 이런 사람들이 촛불 시위에 나가는 거예요. 맞아요, 맞아요.

뭐 꼭 최순실 때마다 나오는 것도 아니야. 알겠습니까? 나라 경제가 못 살겠으니까 이 반사판, 아이고 불난 김에 그냥 알겠습니까? 그래서 이것이 하이에나의 거시 경제는 중국이 해가지고 미시 경제는 이게 했지만은, 이 미시 경제에만 좋다고 하고 그것이 경제는 나쁘다고 할 수 있느냐? 즉, 우리가 LG에서 하는 반도체를 현대에 보낸 거는 미시 경제입니까, 거시 경제입니까? 거시기입니다. 그러면 청와대는 왜 박근혜 대통령은 지난번에 한진해운이 그렇게 난리 나 가지고 전 세계 물동량 마비가 오고 그렇게 됐으면 해운을 구조조정 해야 돼요, 안 해야 돼요? 부실한 해운사를 축소시키고 합병을 시켜 가지고 해운사를 강력한 회사로 만들어야, 만들어야 돼. 해운 불황을 뻔히 내다보고 있으면서 청와대에서는 야당, 여당하고 사파 싸움만 하고 있는 거예요.

그렇지 않습니까? 그러니까 정치적으로 예를 들어서 요거와 잘 보세요. 전번에 헌재에서 정당 하나 없애서는, 정당 이름이 뭡니까? 통진당이죠. 통진당을 해산할 때 그 속도가 빨랐어요, 안 빨랐어요? 속도가 상당히 빨랐죠. 그러니까 이런 것도 우리가 볼 때는 비정상적으로 속도가 빨랐다는 거야.

맞아요, 맞아요. 빨갱이를 잡든, 뭐 사장이 의심스럽든 그걸 잡아가는데 민주주의 국가에서 절차를 지켜가야지. 그렇지 않습니까? 재단법인은 하나 만드는데 국가 주도로 만들다 해서 하루 만에 되고, 국민이 만든 재단법인은 두 달 걸립니까? 돼, 안 돼요? [음악] 국가가 만든 단체는 틀림없어. 근데 그 만드는 과정에 속도가 왜 그리 빨라? 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 우리 국민은 그런 거를 납득을 못 한다는 거예요.

그렇게 해서는 안 돼요. 아무리 국가가 박근혜 대통령이 좋아서 만들어 했어도 대통령이 절차는 밟아야지. 한두 달 걸려야지. 그래, 안 그래요? 국민이 민원 제출한 재단 법인은 두 달 놔두고, 국가에서 하던 걸로 그냥 하루 만에 재단을 수립하는 단체.

회의하는 것도 그냥 앉아서 그냥 책상 앞에서 다 만들어 버리고. 이러면 됩니까, 안 됩니까? 이런 것이 국민들의 공분을 사는 거예요. 그게 도둑질한 거는 아닌데, 그것도 돈이 어디로 가는 건 아닌데. 우리는 연혁, 연혁이 뭡니까? 연혁이라는 건 과정이에요, 과정.

과정. 그 재단을 만드는 과정이 더 중요하지. 결과, 결과. 기나, 이 귀납, 이거는 결과입니다.

결과는 국민들이 그리 중요시하지 않아. 과정이 이 정당을 해산할 때 속도가 엄청 빨랐어요. 미래를 재단, 케이스포츠 재단 만드는 속도가 엄청 빨랐어요. 그렇습니까, 안 그렇습니까? 근데 여러분들이 못 살겠다고 민원을 넣으면 행방불명이야.

오래 걸려, 안 걸려요? 여러분이 재단 하나 만들려고 해 보세요. 시간 오래 걸리지. 이거는 무슨 회의록을 만드는데 혼자 앉아서 써. 사람들 오지도 않았는데.

자, 검찰에서 조사해 보니까 회의를 그냥 혼자 만들었어요. 맞아, 맞아. 나와서 안 나오세요? 그런 것이 우리 국민을 자극하는 거예요. 그 재단에 돈을 누가 빼먹은 게 아니야.

그거 뭐 대통령이 760억을 먹었습니까? 아니에요. 우리 국민한테는 이렇게 연역, 과정, 인덕션, 디덕션 이런 것이 중요한 거야. 이 과정이 잘못되어 가지고 이게. 근데 헌재에서 이 정당을 해산할 때 이정현입니까? 여자 이정현.

대표가 박근혜 대통령하고 TV 토론에서 나는 당신 떨어뜨려 나와서 이랬죠. 이정희, 이정현이가 지금 있는 사람이지. 남자하고 여자하고 이름이 비슷해요. 이 사람이 박근혜하고 대통령 TV 토론에서는 대통령이 독재자의 딸이다, 이런 소리 하면서 떨어뜨리겠다.

난 당신이 드러나왔다 그랬죠. 그렇게 하였을 때 박근혜 대통령이 그것을 머릿속에 넣고 있으면 돼요? 안 돼요. 없애야 됩니다. 그래 내 아버지가 훌륭한 사람이 됐지, 니가 너희가 뭐라 하든 그렇지 않습니까.

국민이 알아주는데 그 뭐 당신들이 피해를 받든 모를 수도 있겠다. 그리고 넘어가야 되는 거예요. 그거에 박근혜 대통령은 우리 국민이 볼 때는 이 사람들 보복이 된 거죠. 헌재에서 없애니까 박근혜 대통령 헌재를 가게 되는 거예요.

인과응보가 그래 안 그래요? 우리는 감정으로 대하면 돼 안 돼? 감정으로 대하면 됩니까, 안 됩니까? 우리의 감성은 이 감성이라는 것은 이성의 지배를 받아 안 받아요? 그러면 이상은 뭐의 지배를 받아야 돼요? 이성이 지성이에요. 영성을 못 따라가. 그래 안 그래요? 영성, 영성 디바이네이처. 영성을 못 따라가는데 영성으로 미래 21세기는 영성으로 정치를 해야 돼.

박근혜를 탁 보면 저 사람은 4년 있으면 물러나 있구나. 아, 트럼프를 탁 보니까 저 사람은 공화당에 16명 후보 중에 골치인데. 내가 그 당시 방송에 나갔을 때 그 트럼프가 한번 틀어봐요. 16번째 꼴찌의 공화당 후보로 나왔을 때 mbn에서 나를 보고 트럼프하고 닮았다는 거야.

근데 보니까 트럼프가 공화당에서 꼴찌야. 후보가 안 됐을 때. 근데 얼굴을 탁 보니까 대통령 상이야. 그런 영적인 눈이 영성이라 그래요.

영성. 이걸 가진 지도자가 여야 해. 지금 있습니까? 없습니까? 없습니다. 여러분이 박근혜 대통령이 빨리 내려올수록 우리나라는 지금 위험한 거야.

왜 대통령이 되어 가지고 영성 있는 지도자가 대통령 후보로 지금 있어? 없어요. 그런데 나는 그 그런 초상집에 들어가고 싶어 하는 가고 싶어? 나는 들어가고 싶은 날짜가 따로 있어요. 그러니 거기에 이상한 사람이 들어가게 된다는 거야. 들어가려면 우리나라 국가는 어떻게 돼요? 어떻게 됩니까? 완전 절단납니다.

절단. 이제 못 일어나요. 박근혜 대통령도 전임자들이 도둑질해 가지고 간 곳간이 산업은행이 부실로 되어 있고, 모든 은행 우리나라 국가 부채 비율이 40%가 넘어요. 그런 나라의 살림살이를 딱 보니까 억장이 무너져.

야, 이 도둑놈 속에 내가 왔구나. 그래, 안 그래요? 이거 어떻게 해야 국민을, 아니 가계부채가 이게 얼마야? 아니, 이거 왜 최고 얼마야? 그럼 하루 이자가 얼마야? 그럼 우리가 하루에 남는 돈이 얼마야? 아이고, 이자도 못 내겠네. 그럼 국민은 뭘 먹고 살아야지. 그래, 안 그래요? 그럼 박근혜 대통령이 얼마나 기가 막히면 공장은 전부 재벌들은 물어보니까 막 월남에 가져가서 뭐, 저 심하면 미얀마로 가져가야 돈이 벌린다고.

한국에 재투자하는 사람 없거든. 그러면서 할 수 없이 문화융성 사업을 시작한 거야. 그렇지 않아요? 그렇지 않습니까? 나는 그거를 하게 된 이유를 이해를 해. 그런 살림살이를 보면서 대통령이 억장이 무너진 거죠.

그러니까 이 박근혜 대통령이 그나마 그게 그런 걸 알고 이 감성을 자제했어야 알겠습니까? 저 감성이 우리가 이 감성을 자제를 못한 것이 문제가 생긴 거예요. 여러분이 이거 이게 뭡니까? 반포지요? 반포지어죠. 이거는 뭡니까? 사람들이 관포지교하고 반포지호를 혼돈해요. 반포지효는 까마귀가 자기 부모가 돌아가고 나면은 꼭 그 어머니, 자기 집을 어머니가 죽은 그 무덤을 해주고, 살아계실 동안에 새끼가 어머니한테 받아먹은 벌레 수만큼 어머니한테 갖다 먹여서, 어머니는 날질 못하니까 늙으면 그냥 새끼 까마귀가 날라 주는 걸 먹고 살다가 거기서 죽어요.

그러면 이제 이 까마귀는 딴 데 가서 집을 지어서 살아요. 반포지효, 이 반포지효가 까마귀가 하는 이 효도를 우리가 우리나라 말로는 효도의 3대 요소가 뭐죠? 3대 효도. 물려 아닙니다. 쉬며, 심여, 대효.

그러니까 이거를 반포지효라 그래. 그러니까 물질로 효도하는 거, 그 다음에 마음으로 효단까지는 해. 그러나 까마귀는 대효는 못하지. 대효는 뭐죠? 입신출세해 가지고 자기 아버지 가문의 이름을 떨치는 거죠.

그렇죠? 뭐 대통령이 됐다 그러면 우리 집안 가문이 뜨잖아. 근데 지금 박근혜 대통령은 아버지가 행한 거에 업어가지고 대통령이 돼 가지고 아버지를 망신을, 어머니 아버지 망신시켰으니까 반포지효에 반대가 되나? 반대 아닙니까? 엄청난 문제가 있는 거예요. 그러니까 자식은 까마귀도 반포지효를 해요. 근데 이 까마귀가 못하는 게 대효야.

어머니 아버지의 명예를 높이는 것은 까마귀가 할 수가 없어. 근데 사람은 할 수가 있단 말이야. 그런데 요거는 효도의 3대 요소는 뭐죠? 생존지효죠. 생전에 효도하는 거.

사후지효. 사망한 다음에 하는 거. 그 다음에 3효죠. 여기서 사모시오.

이거는 사후지요. 이거 왜 내가 이야기를 해주냐면 부모님이 살았을 때는요, 세 가지를 해야 돼. 자, 물리호시며, 대효. 그렇죠? 빨리 시집 장가가서 손자 손녀 놔주는 게 심효.

그리고 며느리를 얻을 때 어머니하고 싸울 만한 여자는 애당초 안 얻어 알겠죠. 그러니까 자기 마음에 드는 게 아니라 자기 어머니 마음에 드는 여자를 택하는 거예요. 효자는 알겠죠? 불효자는 제 마음에 드는 여자를 택하는 거예요. 자, 그래 가지고 요건데이 상호지오 대통령이 어머니, 아버지 유괴사와 박정희 대통령이 평소에 청렴했던 걸 본받아야 되는 거죠.

그걸 항상 생각하면서 인사에 신경 써야 되죠. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 철저히 관리해야 되는 거야. 거기에 한 치 오찬만 있으면 삼호지오가 없어지는 거예요. 맞아, 맞아요? 사모지오를 하기는커녕 부모를 부관참시하는 거야.

부모 집에다 와서 불을 지르는 사람이 없나, 부모 그 생가를 훼손하는 사람이 없나, 묘를 곱게 들고 팔아가는 사람도 있어요. 꽃게를 잠바 안에 넣어 가지고 꽃게 자루를 뽑아가지고 꽃게는 이렇게 협득에다 이렇게 차고 망댕이는 몽둥이는 이렇게 차가 가서 조립을 하는 거야. 무덤에 가서 조립을 해가지고 묘를 박정희 대통령이 뭐를 팔려고 하는 거야. 그래 내가 내가 그걸 목격을 했어요.

내가 그런 곡괭이 들고 오는 사람이 있다고. 그래서 내가 가서 옛날에 있었지, 진짜 고사리 나타나. 그런 아주 그냥 하나는 곡괭이가 이렇게 넣고 자루는 이렇게 안 보여요. 국립묘지에 들어와 가지고 그 사람이 그 앞에 비석에다가 꽃게를 끼워 가지고 탁탁 맞추는 거야.

그러니까 꼭 해야 돼, 안 돼요? 되니까 나이가 82살이야. 아이, 박정희 대통령이 우리 김대중 선생을 뭐 괴롭혔다고 그러면서 책을 주고 그 사람이 그걸 읽고 내 지지자가 내가 내 책을 한 5,000원 돌린 사람이야. 뭐 사가지고 가서 감동을 받아. 야, 그때부터는 박정희 대통령의 열렬한 그 지지자가 되더라고.

김대중 대통령이 얼마나 지지장이었는데. 그렇게 된 적이 있어요. 그런데 삼호지원은 어머니, 아버지의 잘한 점을 언제나 생각해야 되고, 어머니, 아버지가 근근이 전략하던 모습, 고생하던 모습, 아파도 병원에 안 가고, 아파도 소리도 안 하고 그러다가 나중에 돌아가시는 모습을 이 자식이 언제나 생각하니까 백화점에 가서 물건 하나 살 때도 “아이고, 우리 어머니는 고무신 신고 살았는데 내가 이거 100만 원짜리 신발을 꼭 사야 돼, 말아야 돼?” 이럴 수 있어요. 그래, 안 그래? 우리 어머니는 뭐 항상 모시 적삼 그거 뭐 기어 입었는데 내가 지금 좀 살만하다고 막 “이 옷이 얼마짜리야, 이게?” 그럴 수 있어요, 없어요? 이러니까 부모님을 생각하고 항상 근신하는 거야.

그런데 지금 현재 대통령이 그게 좀 안 돼 버린 거예요. 그래서 이 사후지오 할 때 형제가 함께 오손도손 모여서 부모의 기일 날 제사를 지내던 안 지내던 머리를 맞대야 돼, 안 돼야 돼요? 그런데 설날에도 박근혜 대통령 형제를 못 오게 하는 거야. 무슨 이해 갑니까? 본 적이 없어. 이것이 국민들이 볼 때는 뭔가 최태민 씨 쪽에서 한 게 아니냐 이런 의심을 하고 더 괘씸하게 생각하는 거야.

알겠습니까? 그렇다 하더라도 우리는 감정을 버리고 이성보다도 위에 영성으로 바라봐야 돼. 한민족의 미래를 봐야 된단 말이야. 맞아, 안 맞아요? 그래, 감정 나는 대로 그냥 몇 살 잡고 싸우면 그 사람이 잘 될까? 안 됩니다. 알겠습니까? 절대 헌재에서 통진당을 없앨 때 그 속도, 미르재단과 케이스포츠재단 만들 때 그 속도, 국민들이 이해할 수 없는 속도야.

그렇습니까? 아무렇습니까? 그리고 우리는 남한테 모든 짓을 하지 말아야 돼. 모든 말을 들을 때는 그냥 그걸 듣고 말아야 돼. 알겠습니까? 거기에 대해서 내가 권력을 잡았으니까. 너만 좀 봐라, 콱 없애.

그러면 어떻게 돼요? 그래, 안 그래요? 그러니까 좋은 점은 무조건 남한테 돌리고, 부모와 하늘에 돌리고. 나쁜 점은 자기가 기분 나쁜 건 누구한테 돌리라고요? 나 자신에게 돌려야 돼. 맞아, 맞아. 이걸 어기면 심판이 오는 거예요.

맞습니까? 그래서 이 관중과 이거 누구죠? 한 사람은 감포지교가 이 두 사람 우정이죠. 이 사람 누구예요? 그러면 이 두 형제가 이 친구가 이 친구를 임금한테 추천해서 신하로 출전하니까 임금이 조사를 많이 쳤어. 그리고 뭐 여자 아무 문제가 복잡해. 그러니까 임금이 관중을 보고 아니, 너 자네가 추천한 사람이 도둑놈이고 말이야, 아주 질이 안 좋은 사람인데 왜 그런 사람 추천했냐? 딱 그러니까 임금이 그러니까 저 친구가 뭐라고 그래요? 상감마마, 이게 중국 이야기입니다.

중국 제나라 이야기에요. 제 나라 임금이 상감마마, 성인군자를 구하시는 겁니까? 나라 살림을 살리는 사람을 구하는 겁니까? 그러니까 가난한 우리 나라를 살릴 사람을 구해야지. 그러면 전과자가 좋습니다. 이 사람이 적격입니다.

자기가 그걸 임금한테 욕을 먹을 거 알면서 임금한테 추천한 거야. 도인을 구하시는 겁니까? 그러면 나라를 살릴 살림꾼을 일꾼을 구하시는 겁니까? 임금이 나라를 살릴 일꾼을 구하는 거지, 뭐 내가 도의를 구하냐? 그러면 그렇다면 이 사람을 씁시다. 그래서 선거야. 임금이 그래서 그냥 이 두 사람은 서로 편을 돌을.

이게 아마 박근혜와 최순실인가 봐. 그러니까 묘하게 이분이 그런 사람인데도 박근혜 대통령이 믿은 거야. 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 믿었는데 믿는 도끼에 우리 속담은 뭐예요? 발등이 찍힌다. 근데 중국에는 그게 안 그런가 봐.

그래, 안 그래요? 두 사람 사이가 아주 좋았어. 벌써. 시간이 5시 반인가, 뭐 이야기하다 보면 시간이 많이 가버립니다. 자, 그러면은 가수 최사랑 나와서 노래하고, 처음 오신 분이 오늘 많으니까 빨리빨리 나와서 고치고 해야 되니까 조금 있다 나오세요.

얘기를 많이 하시더라구요. 자, 이런 염원들이 다 하나하나 모여져서 정말 그런 세상이 와서, 요즘 이제 기존 정치권들한테는 이제 더 이상 희망이 없다는 그런 말씀들을 많이 하신다고 합니다. 요즘 그러니까 그런 염원들이 다 하나하나 다 모아져서 정말 그런 세상이 왔으면 좋겠습니다, 여러분. 예, 그리고 저기 세계에서도 이제 총재님을 많이 알아보시고 오시는데, 그 미국에서 오신 분, 그 인사 한번 멀리서 오셨으니까 미국에서 오신 철학 교수님이신데, 아, 예, 반갑습니다.

정형순이라고 합니다. 미국 이름은 데이빗 정이고요. 종교 철학을 전공을 했습니다. 국내가 너무 그 소란스러워서 무슨 일인가 하고 보니까 정말 생각한 것보다 훨씬 심각하고요.

그리고 이제 정상적이라 그러면 이제 내년에 대선이 되어서 여러분이 잘 알고 있는 그 UN에서 근무하셨던 밤 아무개 그분의 이제 대선을 좀 돕기 위해서 미리 한국에 왔는데, 와서 보니까 그분이 지도력이 없다고 하는 말이 아니고 한국에는 적합한 분이 아니시구나 하는 걸 알게 됐어요. 미국에 있을 적에는 이렇게 사람들을 만나면 다 한국식 또는 미국식, 저마다 나라마다 그 어떤 그게 다르잖아요. 근데 이제 미국에서는 그분이 잘 맞는 거 같아요. 근데 미국에 있을 때 생각하고 한국에 와서 생각을 보니까 이분은 아니겠구나 싶은 생각이 들어요.

그리고 와서 이렇게 보통 시국이 아니에요. 근데 이제 성남시에 계시는 이 아무개라고 하는 분도 제가 만나보고 요즘 많이 뜨죠. 제가 왔을 적에는 그분이 퍼센트가 안 되는 그런 10%가 넘었더라고요. 반기문 씨를 제쳤더라고요.

어제 그분도 만나보고, 또 왕년에 새누리당의 그 대표를 지내셨던 분, 이 아무개 총재, 전 총재님하고도 연결을 좀 해서 그때 당시에는 대선에 나올지 안 나올지 잘 모르겠다. 근데 얼마 전에 대선 포기하셨죠. 그래서 그분은 나가래 되셨으니까 뭐 더 이상 거론할 필요는 없는데, 그 외에 훌륭하신 분들을 좀 만나서 부족한 능력이지만 그 대선에 도움이 되었으면 하다가 인터넷을 조사하다가 허경영 총재님에 대해서 알게 됐어요. 그래서 한 며칠 동안을 인터넷만 찾아봤어요.

연설하시고 뭐 하시고 하는 그런 걸 봤어요. 상당히 그 시대가 요청하는 분이구나, 이 시대에 꼭 필요한 분이구나 하는 것들을. 그리고 사실은 오늘 한 시간이 한 20분 정도 있으면 왜 이 시대가 우리 허 총재님을 요구하고 있는가 하는 거에 대해서 좀 설명을 좀 드리려고 그랬는데 시간이 안 돼서 이제 배가 고파서 빨리 가야 되겠어요. 그런데 이제 간단히 말씀드리면 다음 시간에 한번 우리 허 총재님이 왜 이 시대에 필요하신 분인가 하는 것을 이제 여러분이 좀 들으시면 한번 놀라실 거예요.

그리고 저도 교수입니다만은 지금 1055회 강의를 이렇게 할 수 있는 분은요, 없어요. 예, 저도 교단에서 학생들 사이에 컴퓨터 교수라고 별명이 붙었어요. 저도 슬라이드 쉬트 페이퍼를 한 번도 보고 강의를 해본 적이 없어요. 근데 그거는 제 전공이니까 그럴 수 있어요.

근데 이분은 강의하는 거를 제가 인터넷에서 보니까 이게 동서남북이 없더라고요. 제가 미국에 있을 적에는요, 아, 그런 생각을 했다가 한국에 와서 보니까 이게 시대가 요청하는 인물이 어떤 건가 하는 걸 알았어요. 나폴레옹의 지게 달라서 나폴레옹이 아니고요, 어떤 그 사람은 참 못생긴 사람이면 치고 자꾸요. 볼품이 없는 사람이지 않습니까? 그런데도 그 시대가 임무를 만들고 영웅을 만드는데, 맞아요.

그래서 25년 동안 우리 허통제님이 참 25년 전에 한국의 것을 예언하셨지만, 그때는 그게 어울리지 않았어요. 그렇죠? 그런데 지금은요, 막 이런 분이 필요한 거예요. 한 가지만 말씀드리면 율곡빌이라고 아세요? 그게 무슨 일이에요? 방위산업체잖아요. 이거 정리를 못하는 겁니까? 안 하는 겁니까? 아니야, 못하는 거예요.

못해요. 왜 못하냐면요, 정권을 잡아도요, 실제로 올라가면요, 그거 정리하려고 하면은요, 저 총 맞아 죽어요. 별 당사 별 단 사람들 전부 다가 거기에 관련되어 있는데, [음악] 군사 쿠데타가 일어나지 않으면 정권 임기가 끝나서 그 사람은 반드시 죽든지 감옥을 가요. 그거 어떡하겠어요? 그럼 그거 하려고 그러면 어떤 사람이 해야 되겠어요? 죽기를 각오한 사람이 아니면 안 되는 거예요.

그렇죠? 그러니까 시대가 어떤 분을 요구하냐면요, “나 죽겠다는 거야. 대한민국 구하겠다는 거야.” 지금 장롱이라고 하시는 분들 얘기 들어보면요, 이분들이 국가를 구하겠다고는 다 해요. 근데 그 안에를 자세히 들여다보면요, 죽기까지는 아니야. 이게 문제라니까.

다 포함됐다고 하시더라고요. 철학이 있어요. 죽을 각오를 하니까 그게 돼야 이 어두운 세상을 이걸 만들어 낼 거 아니에요. 그러니까 그거 하실 용기가 없는 거예요.

그래서 제 마음을 바꿨어요. 야, 이 한국은 정말로 보통뿐이 대통령 되어서는 안 되겠구나. 절대 안 됩니다. [박수] 달려 보실게요.

당신은 부자예요. 사랑합니다. 부자 되세요. 당신의 행복이 나의 행복인 걸, 당신은 부자가 될 거야, 행복하세요, 부자 되세요, 당신을 사랑합니다.

누군가 한번쯤은 절망하고, 누구나 몇 번쯤은 쉽지는 않지만 어려울 것도 없지요. 사랑해요. 부자들과의 잔치도 부자의 거야. [음악] 행복하세요, 부자 되세요.

당신을 사랑합니다. 자, 여러분, 허경영, 허경영, 부자 되세요. [음악] 자, 한 번 더, 허경영, 허경영. 자, 여러분, 모두 다 부자가 되신 것 같습니다.

여러분, 제가 한번쯤은 설마 또 하고, 누가 몇 번쯤은 쉬라고 있죠. 바치는 저마다 괜찮아. 어려울 것 같아요. 사랑이 고 힘을 내세요.

[음악] 행복하세요. 당신을 사랑합니다. 당신을 사랑합니다. 당신을 사랑합니다.

사랑합니다. 기다리세요. [박수] 오늘 유튜브에 댓글 하는 읽어봅시다. 허경영 총재님, 가나다 몬트리올에서 이번 강의도 너무도 감동적으로 봤습니다.

허경영만큼 지혜롭고도 통찰적으로 국내 문제, 국제 문제를 종합적으로 볼 수 있는 정치인은 대한민국에서는 절대 없습니다. 해박한 여러분의 지식과 역사를 꿰뚫는 정통한 지혜에 그저 매료될 뿐입니다. 지금 정치권에 회자되는 대권 주자들을 지난 9월 10일 한국에 나가서 이런저런 자리에서 만난 사람들이 여러 명 있는데, 솔직히 이재명 성남시장 정도가 그나마 나았던 기억입니다. 이재명 씨가 대한민국에서 가장 존경하는 사람이 허경영 총재라는 얘기를 한 것으로 아는데, 이 또한 의미 있는 발언이라고 봅니다.

문재인, 박원순, 정동영, 손학규 등등 직접 만나본 내 견해론 허경영 총재의 20% 수준에 불과한 허접 경험으로 말씀드립니다. 기가 막히네요. 한국 방문 시 두 차례 만난 기억은 캐나다 현지에서도 교민들과 많은 지지로 이끌어 내도록 돕겠습니다. 우리나라 와서 나를 만났어요.

최선을 다해 젊은이들, 청장년층들에게 많은 홍보를 해 주시길 바랍니다. 11월 21일 며칠, 열흘 됐는데, 자 그거 국제신문, 국제신문 요새는 내가 며칠 전에 TBS에 나가서 1시간 반 동안 했거든. TV에서 나가서 김 누구지, 김미화 코미디 그분하고 1시간 반 동안 라디오 방송, 여러분 운전하고 교통방송이잖아요. 거기에 내가 이번에 세 번째 나갔는데 아주 그냥 재밌었어요.

여기 보면은 국제신문, 내년 돼서는 한국판 트럼프 나오나 이렇게 돼 있죠. 여기 보면 뭐라면 더불어민주당의 전략 통인 민병두 의원은, 이적으로 민주당 전략통이니까 민주당에서 아주 그 미래를 잘 보는 사람이죠. 민병두 의원은 이날 언론 인터뷰에서 미국의 분노한 왼쪽 개념은 샌더스를 지지하고 오른쪽 대중은 트럼프를 움직일 것인데, 우리나라도 내년에 이대로 가면 경제가 최악으로 치달을 것이고 허경영처럼 과감한 공약을 내세운 사람이 선거에 안 나오면 대륙이 쉽게 움직이지 않을 수 있다고 진단했다. 맞습니까? 더불어민주당의 전략을 이야기하는가 하면은 많은 신문에서 내 이야기가 나와요.

이제 이런 이야기가 허경영이가 어떻게 야당에서도 허경영에게 과감한 사람이 안 나오면 이제 희망이 없다. 그 다음에 트럼프 그 이거 말고 또 있잖아요. 이거는 코리아데일리 지, 코리아델, 코리아 델리도 허경영이, 허경영이 대통령이 탄생된 꼴이라고 해가지고 기사가 나왔어요. 새누리당은 박근혜 싸움하지 말고 허경영을 영업해야 영입하길 빕니다.

이게 논객들이 신문에 낸 글이에요. 갈수록 내에 대한 이야기가 많이 나오는데 트럼프 당선 영상 나온다면 틀어봐요. 오늘 처음 오신 분들 한번 보세요. 지금 공약을 하시는 분이 있거든요.

왜냐하면 한국에도 2015년 9월 24일 날 MBN 방송에 나가서 트럼프가 나왔을 때, 나하고 닮았다고 그래서 내가 “저 사람이 미국에 대통령이 될 사람이다” 내가 그랬어요. “저 사람이 미국의 희망이다.” 어떻게 꼴찌 후보 보고 그러세요? 그런데 나는 이미 그 사람을 보는 순간에 알아본 거야. 그래서 우리 국민들께 아까운 사실, 듣긴 좀 불편하실지 모르겠지만 공약이 조금은 너무 나간 것 같다, 그리고 쇼맨십이 있다는 차원에서 이제 공통점을 제시하는 분들이 있어요. 저희가 좀 들어보고 싶은데요.

패널로 저희가 준비를 해보면 개선 때마다, 지금 이번에도 나가실 거죠? 네. 그때마다 사실은 많은 분들이 이제 관심을 갖고 보기는 하지만, 사실 기성 정치권은 공격하는데 좀 통쾌하다라는 생각을 해도 진지하게 보고 있질 않다라는 거죠. 공약이 좀 허무맹랑한 게 아니냐라는 지적이 있는데, 이 부분에 대해서 어떻게 평가하시겠습니까? 전문가가 대통령이 되면은 우리 한반도는 전쟁이 안 나는 거예요. 북한이 뭘 원하는지, 남한이 뭘 원하는지 알잖아요.

남한은 돈 좀 더 내놔라 이거야. 돈만 주면 안 싸우는 100%야. 그래, 안 그래요? 응. 그래.

우리가 안보 부담 좀 더 하겠다 이러면 되는 거야. 저 사람은 장사꾼이니까 우리 이 사람 부탁을 좀 해 줄 수가 있다 이거야. 알겠죠? 이런 사람이 더 좋아요. 오히려 의령부에 하면서 한국은 우리하고 별명이야 이러면서 가만히 이렇게 구멍으로 북한하고 손잡아 가지고 먹어버린 나라가 오려면 그러니까 우리나라도 북한하고 미국이 힐러리 같으면 속닥속닥 속닥 할 수 있어요.

굉장히 무서워요. 힐러리가 대통령 되면은 한반도 전쟁이 가능하다 이 말이야. 자, 이게 2016년 5월 달이에요. 그러니까 나는 힐러리가 되면 우리나라 전쟁이 나니까 안 된다 그랬는데, 전 세계 언론은 힐러리가 99% 된다고, 당일 날 선거 당일 날도 힘들게 된다는 거예요, 방송에는.

그러다가 막판에 가서는 뒤집어졌죠. 그런데 이런 걸 1년 반 전에 내다보는 눈. 열 공화당에 16명 중에 꼴찌지만 보니까 얼굴을 딱 보니까 대통령이야. 그런데 영적인 눈이 우리가 있어야 되는데, 지금 우리나라 정치인들 있습니까? 없습니다.

그러면 우리 지금 정치인들이 박근혜가 빨리 내려오면 더 빨리 내려올 수 나쁜 사람이 올라가는 거야. 올라갈 가능성이 많아. 그러면 올라가면 우리나라의 어린이, 젊은 대학생들은 앞으로 우리나라 중국에 가서 신보살이 하게 되는 민족으로 전략하게 되고, 나라 굳고 그나마 조금 남은 거 다 도둑질해서 나는 망합니다. 자, 그 다음에 적어 봐요.

미국과 북한이 성신이 생길 가능성이 역설과 19대 대통령 누가 된다고 한가한 보자고. 역설로 가서 인터넷에서 나온 거예요. 노무현 대통령 자살의 트럼프까지 예측한 역설이니 말하는 19대 대통령은 다음 대통령 누구냐. 이렇게 나오죠.

인터넷에 나와 있는 거예요. [음악] 국내 유력 대권주자들은 트럼프가 친분을 쌓기 위해 다각도로 외교 라인을 가동하는 것을 물론 최순실 씨의 모든 사실을 덮어주기에 빠르게 움직이고 있다. 뿔난 국민들은 결국 박근혜 대통령 탄핵을 외치며 광화문 광장에 모이기 시작했고, 우리는 자연스러운 내년 12월 7일 치러질 19대 대통령에 관심이 쏠리겠다. 언제는 새로운 대통령에 관심을 가진 것은 국민의 권리다.

그다음에 올려봐야지, 내 부분 나오는 국민들의 궁금증을 풀어주면서 예언이 나왔다. 최근 온라인 커뮤니티를 통해 정치권의 모든 일을 예언한 역술인이 말한 19대 대통령에는 제목의 게시글이 누리꾼들의 관심을 끌었다. 이는 박정희 대통령 암살, 노무현 대통령 당선 및 서거, 김일성 부자의 사망 연도 예측, 트럼프 당선, 그리고 박근혜 대통령까지 모두 예언했다는 화제를 모은 역술인이 올린 19대 대통령 예언으로 국민들을 충격에 빠뜨렸다. 이런 역술인이 있죠.

이 사람이 하는 거는 나한테 비하면 발가락에도 못 오는 거예요. 그러나 보세요. 그걸 주장에 따르면 현재 거론되는 대권 주자 중 대한민국 19대 대통령이 될 수 있는 인물은 없다고 밝혔다. 그렇죠? 괴짜라고 불리던 트럼프가 미국 대통령이 되는 모습을 보았다면, 대한민국도 느끼는 것이 있어야 한다.

시대의 흐름은 미국을 따라가든, 한국도 지금은 괴짜로만 인식된 인물이 결국 성천에 청와대의 주인이 될 것이라고도 붙였다. 과연 그가 예측한 19대 대통령은 누구일까? 올려 봐요. 저는 허경영 씨가 청와대 주인이 될 거라고 말했다. 사진 출처 MBC 캡처.

이 모든 사실을 알게 된 누리꾼은 당황스럽다. 그렇죠? 지금 그게 말이 되냐? 그런 우리 군대 있을 수 있지. 그렇죠? 허경영이 대통령이 되는 것보다 내가 되는 게 빠르다. 이런 학생들이 있을 수 있지.

등의 반응을 보이며 그저 계속 소문으로 넘기고 있지만, 일각에서는 말도 안 되는 루머에 대한 두려움도 나타내고 있다. 그렇죠? 지금 대한민국에서는 말도 안 된다고 손가락질을 받던 일들이 현실이 되었다. 대통령이 마약을 사용했다는 의혹을 받는 것은 물론, 아이들을 제물로 바쳤다는 소문까지. 거기에 대외적으로 배차 대통령.

트럼프의 당선으로 새롭게 시작되는 역사, 어쩌면 우리가 주목해야 할 것은 허경영 사실이 아니라, 이런 개소문까지 나올 만큼 국민들을 만족시켜 줄 일꾼이 없다는 사실에 슬퍼해야만 할지도 모릅니다. 그래 안 그래요? 자, 그러면 이적하는 계좌는 다음 대통령으로 19대도 연애했죠, 그렇죠? 그러니까 들어가는데, 나는 지금 저런 식으로 앞에 앉는 사람을 끄집어내리고 들어가고 싶지가 않다 이 말이에요. 정정당당하게 내년 12월에 선거에 나가야지, 뭐 남의 발목 잡아가지고 올라가는 그런 거는 좋지가 않아요. 맞죠? 그러니까 우리는 정상적인 선거를 하자.

대통령 선거가 지금 진행되고 있어요, 맞죠? 요거는 10월 22일 날 마지막 날, 한국인 93% 힐러리 지지. 이거 뭐 무슨 방송이라고? 매일경제. 매일경제 한국인 93%가 힐러리를 지지했대요. 76%가 미 대선에서 힐러리 후보가 이길 거라고 말한다고 답했다고 여기를 보도했다.

한국인의 힐러리 지지는 93%를 기록한다면 트럼프는 7%를 기록하겠다. 그렇죠? 미국의 대통령을 한반도 핵전쟁을 막아줄 사람을 뽑아야 되겠어, 한 사람 뽑아야 되겠어요? 결정할 수 있는 사람은 허경영밖에 없다는 거 맞습니까, 안 맞습니까? 미국의 대통령은 허경영이 결정한다. 이제 미국의 대통령 트럼프를 요렇게 저렇게 해서 만들어 낸 사람이 누구라고요? 근데 나는 미국 대통령들은 세계 통일까지 해낼 사람인데, 한국에 잡년들하고 싸우려니까 제피안이 창피해요. 그래요.

그러니까 나는 뜨뜻하게 내년에 대선에 직접 나갈 거예요. 알겠죠? 그래서 오늘은 강의 마무리하고 시간이 다 됐나? 6시네. 자, 뭐 강의를 좀 있는데 궁금한 거는 우리 하늘궁에 와서 질문해요. 그리고 오늘 처음 보신 분들 나오세요.

자, 그러면은 여기서 남자 한 사람. 자, 여러분들이 보세요. 이분들이 거제에서 왔어요. 거제도에서 부산으로 해서 또 올라와야 되잖아요.

이분이 보니까 건강해 보이죠. 그러니까 허경영은 우주 에너지를 가지고 위에서 와 있어서 일반 사람하고는 반대라는 건 아시죠? 많이 맞죠? 봅시다. 손해 봐. 이런 거 알겠죠? 자, 카메라 했어요.

이렇게 떼세요. 자, 허경영과 예수와 석가모니 중에 마음속으로 해서 누군지를 모르게 아무나 한 사람 시작. 그거는 예수님. 자, 석가모니.

예, 예. 마음속으로 해도 안 떨어져. 이 지구상에서 내 이름만 그래. 그러면 내 사진만 보면 그래요.

여러분 사진은 그냥 부처님도 떨어지고 예수님도 떨어진다. 허경영을 부르면 병이 일단 좋아져. 그리고 내가 직접 보면은 고치고. 그러니까 특사죠.

그러니까 내가 여러분처럼 잉태된 사람은 아닌데, 나는 종교를 싫어해. 교회를 가도 괜찮고, 절에 가도 괜찮고, 목사님도 좋고, 스님도 좋고, 다 좋아요. 다 좋은 일 하는 분들이니까. 그러나 보면서 예수님의 기도합니다.

아멘. 그리고 허경영해야 된다는 있어요. 이렇게 깨세요. 자, 본인 이름 불러봐요.

시작. 그거는 예수. 예, 맞습니다. 그다음 또 시작.

자, 석가모니. 예, 맞습니다. 그리고 내 사진만 보면 그래요. 여러분 사진은 그냥 부처님 상에서 병이 일단 좋아져요.

그리고 내가 직접 보면은 특사죠. 그러니까 내가 여러분처럼 잉태된 사람은 아닌데, 나는 종교를 싫어해. 우선인지 알겠죠? 그냥 종교들은 좋아하는데, 불교들을 좋아하는데 종교 행위를 싫어한단 말이야. 이제는 호갱님만 부르면 되는 거야.

교회를 가도 괜찮고, 절에 가도 괜찮고, 목사님도 좋고, 스님도 좋고, 다 좋아요. 다 좋은 일하는 분들이니까, 그러나 보면서 예수님의 이름으로 기도합니다. 아멘. 그리고 허경영해야 된다는 겁니다.

나무아미타불 하고 세계 통일이라고 나서 가요. 나는 위에서 왔고 여러분 같은 몸을 가지고 왔지만, 여러분하고 에너지가 반대야. 그러나 여기서만 이렇게 되는 게 아니고 집에 가서 해도 마찬가지야. 그러니까 나를 부르고 잠을 자면 나이가 거꾸로 가, 거꾸로.

그러니까 덜 늙죠. 그러니까 수명이 길어져. 알겠죠? 나를 안 불렀으니까 나이를 잡은 거지. 알겠죠? 자, 그럼 이번에 병을 이제 한번 보자고.

손, 손. 이렇게 이게 청진기야. 이게 암이 있는데 가면 손이 저절로 떨어져요. 암이 있는 데가.

이분은 암은 없어. 아무도 없는데 안 좋은 애들이 많이 있어. 자, 한번 더 해봐요. 자, 힘 좀 와요.

힘이 없죠. 근데 여기 하면 돼 보세요. 여기는 안 아픈데요. 안 떨어지죠.

세죠. 한 번만 딱 떼보세요. 시작. 강력하죠.

내가 되는데. 자, 보세요. 하나, 둘, 셋. 힘이세요.

없죠. 빠져버리죠. 그런데 이분이 다른 데는 이상이 없는데 요쪽에 다 문제가 있어. 자, 여기도 내보세요.

빠지죠. 이제 전체적으로 기관지. 자, 기관지 봅시다. 힘있었어요.

없죠. 내가 되라는 대로 정말 힘이 없는 거야. 뭐 이분이 때도 마찬가지예요. 다 떨어지죠.

그런데 이분은 이쪽이 다 나쁜 거야. 알겠습니까? 갑상선도 빵점, 기관지도 빵점. 담배는 안 피는데 왜 이래요? 담배 안 피우잖아. 기관지가 나빠.

이마 시작. 뇌졸증, 중풍도 오고 있어요. 내일 봅시다. 고쳐 버려야지.

자, 내 차가 봐요. 이제 다 고쳤다. 자, 아무 때나 안 떨어지죠. 안 들리죠.

이 마음대로 해보세요. 나도 어린애 너를 바꿔놨어요. 안 떨어지죠. 안 떨어지죠.

다 안 떨어져요. 기관지 돼보세요. 떨어집니까? 안 떨어지죠. 그냥 나를 보면 되는데 미국에 있어도.

마찬가지 핸드폰으로 보면 돼. 그럼 그 사람은 일단 고쳐. 이런 의사는 세계에 없어요. 없습니다.

내가 선생을 속이는 게 아니야. 무슨 최면도 0.1초에 그런 사람 있나? 없어요. 이거는 실제 내가 여론을 만든 장본인이 인간의 몸으로 대한민국에 온 거야. 여러분들은 복 받은 거지.

그렇죠? 나는 종교를 해야 될 이유가 있어 없어? 할 필요가 없어. 알겠습니까? 그냥 그 사람들이 내 이름 부르던 말든 나는 관여 안 해. 알겠습니다. 이름만 부르면 돼.

알겠죠? 돈도 받을 필요가 없어. 알겠죠? 자, 완치. 자, 백 운동 좀 해야 돼. 알겠습니까? 자, 내 쳐다보세요.

다 고쳤어. 이제 옆으로 서시고. 이제 허경영을 크게 불렀으니까 성공하시겠네요. 다 됐고.

자, 이쪽에서부터 할까? 해보면 여기는 백화점이야. 백화점을 다 손보는 거야. 지금 백화점이야. 백화점.

[음악] 다 됐어요. 저 뒤로 쓰세요. 뒤로 눈 감아요. 한 사람은 뒤로 서면 내가 압니다.

뒤로. 여자들은 가슴 유방암도 많이 오니까 내가 한번 봐 버리면 유방암도 안 오니까 다 고쳤습니다. 이 마음도 없어지고 관절도 좀 봐야 돼. 됐습니다.

오케이. 다 됐습니다..

Key Philosophical and Strategic Terms from Huh Kyung Young’s Lecture

원진살 (怨嗔煞): Karmic Conflict, Adversarial Alignment, Destined Discord
A specific astrological affliction indicating a deep-seated, often karmic, conflict or animosity between two entities or within a period. In the context of the lecture, it refers to a year (2016) that brings misfortune and conflict, specifically for President Park Geun-hye, suggesting a period of intense struggle and potential downfall.

천지비괘 (天地否卦): Hexagram of Stagnation, Cosmic Misalignment, State of Obstruction
A specific hexagram from the I Ching (Book of Changes) that symbolizes stagnation, obstruction, and disharmony, particularly when “Heaven” (male principle) is above and “Earth” (female principle) is below, preventing proper interaction and flow. In the lecture, it is used to describe the current state of Korea, implying national decline and conflict due to an imbalance in gender roles and leadership, likening it to a failing marriage.

지천태괘 (地天泰卦): Hexagram of Peace, Cosmic Harmony, State of Prosperity
A specific hexagram from the I Ching that symbolizes peace, prosperity, and harmony, occurring when “Earth” (female principle) is above and “Heaven” (male principle) is below, allowing for beneficial interaction and growth. The lecture uses this to advocate for a societal structure where women are respected and empowered, leading to national well-being and a “golden age.”

무극 (無極): Ultimate Void, Primordial Undifferentiation, Infinite Potential
A philosophical concept in East Asian thought referring to the “limitless” or “ultimate void” before the differentiation into yin and yang (Taiji). It represents a state of pure potential and unity. In the lecture, it is presented as a superior symbol to the Taegeuk (Taiji) for a national flag, implying a more powerful and encompassing cosmic energy, free from dualistic conflict.

거시적 안목 (巨視的 眼目): Macro Perspective, Holistic View, Strategic Foresight
The ability to view situations from a broad, overarching perspective, considering large-scale patterns and long-term implications rather than focusing on minute details. The lecture criticizes Korean media and politicians for lacking this, instead being preoccupied with “microscopic” issues like the Choi Soon-sil scandal, thereby missing the larger national and international context.

미시적 안목 (微視的 眼目): Micro Perspective, Detailed Focus, Tactical View
The ability to view situations with a focus on small-scale details, individual components, and immediate circumstances. The lecture contrasts this with the “macro perspective,” arguing that an overemphasis on micro-level issues (like the Choi Soon-sil scandal) by Korean media and politicians leads to a failure to address larger, more critical national problems.

반포지효 (反哺之孝): Filial Piety of Reciprocity, Repaying Parental Kindness, Ultimate Devotion
A concept of filial piety, often symbolized by a crow feeding its elderly parents, signifying the act of children repaying the kindness and care they received from their parents. The lecture uses this to criticize President Park Geun-hye, suggesting her actions brought shame to her parents’ legacy, thus failing in this profound aspect of filial duty.

입신출세 (立身出世): Achieving Prominence, Rising in Society, Gaining Renown
The act of establishing oneself in society and achieving success, often bringing honor and prestige to one’s family name. In the lecture, it is presented as the “greatest filial piety” (대효), which even crows cannot achieve, implying that human children have the unique ability to elevate their family’s standing through their accomplishments.

인과응보 (因果應報): Karma, Retribution, Consequence of Actions
The principle that every action has a corresponding reaction or consequence, often implying a moral or spiritual justice where good deeds are rewarded and bad deeds are punished. The lecture applies this to President Park Geun-hye’s situation, suggesting her past actions (like dissolving a political party) are now leading to her own downfall.

영성 (靈性): Spiritual Insight, Intuitive Wisdom, Cosmic Awareness
A profound, non-rational form of understanding or perception that transcends ordinary intellect, allowing one to grasp deeper truths, foresee future events, or understand the essence of things. The lecture emphasizes this as a crucial quality for a leader, claiming that Huh Kyung Young possesses this “spiritual eye” to predict political outcomes like Trump’s election and Park Geun-hye’s impeachment.

중앙토 (Central Earth/Foundation)]
[정 (Essence/Vitality)]
[영성 (Spiritual Insight)]
[원진살 (Conflictual Alignment)]
[인신사해 (Revolutionary Confluence)]
[삼합 (Harmonious Triad)]
[관상 (Physiognomy/Aura)]
[천지비괘 (Hexagram of Stagnation)]
[지천태괘 (Hexagram of Peace and Prosperity)]
[무극 (Ultimate Void/Infinite Potential)]
[거시적 안목 (Macro-perspective/Strategic Vision)]
[미시적 안목 (Micro-perspective/Tactical Focus)]
[반포지효 (Filial Piety of the Crow/Reciprocal Devotion)]
[물질효 (Material Filial Piety)]
[심효 (Emotional Filial Piety)]
[대효 (Ultimate Filial Piety/Glorification)]
[생전지효 (Filial Piety in Life)]
[사후지효 (Posthumous Filial Piety)]
[부관참시 (Posthumous Disgrace/Desecration)]
[인과응보 (Karma/Retribution)]
[감성 (Emotion/Sentiment)]
[이성 (Reason/Rationality)]
[지성 (Intellect/Cognition)]
[연역 (Deduction/Process)]
[귀납 (Induction/Outcome)]

부교감신경(副交感神經)-(부(副)-para, 교감(交感)-sympathetic, 신경(神經)-nerve)
Parasympathetic nervous system, also related to emotional and physical states.

난세(亂世)-(난(亂)-chaos, 세(世)-era)
A chaotic or troubled era.

옥동자(玉童子)-(옥(玉)-jade, 동자(童子)-child)
A precious child or a gifted person, often used to refer to a savior figure.

주체성(主體性)-(주체(主體)-subject, 성(性)-nature)
Subjectivity or self-identity, emphasizing national independence and unique character.

하늘궁(天空宮)-(하늘(天空)-heaven, 궁(宮)-palace)
“Heavenly Palace,” proposed new name for the Blue House, symbolizing a connection to divine authority.

예언(豫言)-(예(豫)-foretell, 언(言)-speak)
A prophecy or prediction. In the context, it refers to the speaker’s predictions about political events like the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and Trump’s election.

영성(靈性)-(영(靈)-spirit, 성(性)-nature)
Spirituality or spiritual insight. The speaker claims his predictions come from “spirituality,” not mere fortune-telling.

탄핵(彈劾)-(탄(彈)-impeach, 핵(劾)-censure)
Impeachment. Used in reference to the impeachment of President Park Geun-hye.

당선(當選)-(당(當)-be elected, 선(選)-elect)
Election or being elected. Refers to the election of political figures like Trump and the speaker himself.

유권자(有權者)-(유(有)-have, 권(權)-right, 자(者)-person)
Voter or enfranchised person. Refers to those eligible to vote in an election.

중산층(中産層)-(중(中)-middle, 산(産)-produce, 층(層)-layer)
Middle class. The speaker promises to make all Koreans middle class by providing financial benefits.

국유지(國有地)-(국(國)-nation, 유(有)-possess, 지(地)-land)
State-owned land. The speaker proposes selling state-owned assets to fund his policies.

비상계엄(非常戒嚴)-(비(非)-not, 상(常)-normal, 계엄(戒嚴)-martial law)
Martial law. The speaker mentions declaring martial law after becoming president.

국회의원(國會議員)-(국(國)-nation, 회(會)-assembly, 의원(議員)-member)
Member of the National Assembly (parliament). The speaker plans to reorganize the National Assembly.

기부(寄附)-(기(寄)-donate, 부(附)-attach)
Donation or contribution. Refers to an act of donating money to charity.

천부경(天符經)-(천(天)-heaven, 부(符)-tally, 경(經)-sutra)
Cheonbugyeong, an ancient Korean text. Mentioned as a source of wisdom regarding the treatment of women.

주역(周易)-(주(周)-Zhou, 역(易)-change)
I Ching (Book of Changes). Used to explain the symbolism of the Korean flag and gender roles.

태극기(太極旗)-(태(太)-great, 극(極)-ultimate, 기(旗)-flag)
Taegeukgi, the national flag of South Korea. The speaker criticizes its design based on I Ching principles.

패망(敗亡)-(패(敗)-defeat, 망(亡)-ruin)
Ruin or downfall. Used to describe the fate of a nation if its flag’s symbolism is incorrect.

지천태괘(地天泰卦)-(지(地)-earth, 천(天)-heaven, 태(泰)-peace)
Zhitian Tai Gua, a hexagram from the I Ching symbolizing peace and prosperity. The speaker suggests the flag should reflect this.

무극(無極)-(무(無)-none, 극(極)-ultimate)
Wuji, the ultimate non-duality or infinite. The speaker contrasts it with Taegeuk, suggesting Japan’s flag (representing Wuji) is superior.

원진살(元辰殺)-(원(元)-original, 진(辰)-time, 살(殺)-kill)
Wonjinsal, a concept in 사주 (saju, four pillars of destiny) indicating conflict or misfortune. Used to explain Park Geun-hye’s political troubles.

오판(誤判)-(오(誤)-mistake, 판(判)-judgment)
Misjudgment or miscalculation. The speaker warns against actions that could lead to North Korea’s misjudgment.

간첩(間諜)-(간(間)-spy, 첩(諜)-spy)
Spy or secret agent. Used in the context of the Vietnam War and potential threats to South Korea.

관상(觀相)-(관(觀)-observe, 상(相)-face)
Physiognomy or face reading. The speaker uses it to evaluate political candidates.

대운(大運)-(대(大)-great, 운(運)-fortune)
Daewoon, a concept in saju referring to a major period of fortune. Used to explain Park Geun-hye’s unfavorable period.

긴급재정권(緊急財政權)-(긴급(緊急)-emergency, 재정(財政)-finance, 권(權)-right)
Emergency financial power. The speaker asserts the president has such powers.

사면권(赦免權)-(사(赦)-pardon, 면(免)-exempt, 권(權)-right)
Power of pardon. The speaker argues the president has the right to pardon.

가계부채(家計負債)-(가계(家計)-household, 부채(負債)-debt)
Household debt. A major economic issue the speaker promises to resolve.

청룡상(靑龍相)-(청(靑)-blue, 용(龍)-dragon, 상(相)-face)
Blue Dragon physiognomy. A highly auspicious facial feature, which the speaker claims no current politicians possess.

황룡상(黃龍相)-(황(黃)-yellow, 용(龍)-dragon, 상(相)-face)
Yellow Dragon physiognomy. Another auspicious facial feature, also claimed to be absent among current politicians.

이무기상(螭龍相)-(이무기(螭龍)-immugi, 상(相)-face)
Immugi physiognomy. Immugi is a mythical creature that is a lesser dragon. The speaker uses it to describe a politician who cannot achieve full success.

국제신문(國際新聞)-(국제(國際)-international, 신문(新聞)-newspaper)
International newspaper. Refers to media outlets discussing the speaker’s political influence.

거시경제(巨視經濟)-(거시(巨視)-macro, 경제(經濟)-economy)
Macroeconomics. The speaker discusses it in contrast to microeconomics.

미시경제(微視經濟)-(미시(微視)-micro, 경제(經濟)-economy)
Microeconomics. The speaker discusses it in contrast to macroeconomics.

구조조정(構造調整)-(구조(構造)-structure, 조정(調整)-adjust)
Restructuring. The speaker suggests the need for restructuring in the shipping industry.

공분(公憤)-(공(公)-public, 분(憤)-anger)
Public outrage. Used to describe the public’s anger over the government’s actions.

인과응보(因果應報)-(인(因)-cause, 과(果)-effect, 응(應)-respond, 보(報)-retribution)
Karma or retribution. The speaker uses it to explain the consequences of actions.

감성(感性)-(감(感)-feel, 성(性)-nature)
Emotion or sensibility. The speaker emphasizes controlling emotions with reason and spirituality.

이성(理性)-(이(理)-reason, 성(性)-nature)
Reason or rationality. The speaker suggests reason should govern emotion.

지성(知性)-(지(知)-know, 성(性)-nature)
Intellect or intelligence. The speaker states that intellect cannot surpass spirituality.

반포지효(反哺之孝)-(반(反)-return, 포(哺)-feed, 지(之)-of, 효(孝)-filial piety)
Filial piety of a crow. Refers to the act of a child caring for elderly parents, as crows are said to do. The speaker contrasts this with Park Geun-hye’s actions.

입신출세(立身出世)-(입(立)-establish, 신(身)-self, 출(出)-emerge, 세(世)-world)
Achieving success and rising in the world. The speaker describes it as a higher form of filial piety.

생전지효(生前之孝)-(생전(生前)-lifetime, 지(之)-of, 효(孝)-filial piety)
Filial piety during one’s lifetime. One of the three types of filial piety mentioned.

사후지효(死後之孝)-(사후(死後)-after death, 지(之)-of, 효(孝)-filial piety)
Filial piety after death. One of the three types of filial piety mentioned.

부관참시(剖棺斬屍)-(부(剖)-cut open, 관(棺)-coffin, 참(斬)-behead, 시(屍)-corpse)
Posthumous decapitation. The speaker uses this strong metaphor to describe actions that dishonor one’s parents.

관포지교(管鮑之交)-(관(管)-Guan, 포(鮑)-Bao, 지(之)-of, 교(交)-friendship)
Guan Bao’s friendship. Refers to a deep and loyal friendship, like that between Guan Zhong and Bao Shuya. The speaker uses it to describe the relationship between Park Geun-hye and Choi Soon-sil.

1. 예언과 영성 정치

박근혜 대통령 탄핵 및 촛불 시위 예언: 4년 전부터 예언했으며, 이는 점쟁이의 예언이 아닌 영성으로 본 것.
트럼프 당선 예언: 1년 2개월 전부터 예언했으며, 힐러리가 당선되면 한국에 전쟁이 날 것이라고 경고.
트럼프는 당시 공화당 후보 중 꼴찌였으나, 그의 얼굴을 보고 대통령 상임을 알아봤다고 언급.
미래 정치의 방향: 21세기 정치는 영성으로 해야 한다.

2. 대통령 당선 및 공약

90% 득표율 당선: 국민 5천만 명 중 3,600만 명이 투표하고, 그중 90%의 득표율로 당선될 것.
초반 여론조사에서는 0.1%로 시작하여 텔레비전 토론 후 90%까지 상승할 것이라고 예측.
주요 공약:
국민 1인당 월 150만 원 배당금 지급: 20세 이상 국민 통장에 매달 지급하여 100% 중산층 달성.
가계 부채 해결: 5억 미만 주택 대출은 국가가 무상 상환하고, 나머지 가계 부채 이자는 국가가 부담.
국유지, 국가 소유 기업 및 부동산 매각 자금 활용.
결혼 장려금: 결혼하는 사람에게 주택 자금 2억 원 지급.
교육 개혁: 중고등학생은 한 과목만 시험 보고 수능 폐지.
음악 등 특기 시험 6년간 총합계로 대학 진학 가능.
과외 및 학원비 절감으로 가계 경제 활성화.
투표 연령 하향: 14세부터 투표권 부여하여 민주주의 교육 및 투표율 증진.
투표 불참 시 학점 및 사회 진출에 불이익 부여.
국회 개혁: 대통령 당선 후 비상계엄 선포, 국회의원 정리 후 100명으로 축소하여 강력한 국정 운영.

3. 한국 사회 문제 진단 및 해결책

태극기 문제: 현재 태극기는 주역의 ‘천지비괘’로 나라가 망하는 괘이며, ‘지천태괘’로 바꿔야 한다..
남자가 위에 있고 여자가 밑에 있는 형국은 부부싸움과 남북 싸움을 유발.
여자가 위에 있고 남자가 밑에 있을 때 태평성대가 온다고 설명.
태극기는 일본 외교관이 급하게 만들어 주역을 모르는 채 사용 중이라고 언급.
일본 국기 ‘무극’은 우주 전체를 의미하여 가장 강력한 깃발.
청와대 명칭 문제: ‘청와대’는 ‘푸른 기와집’으로 흔하고, ‘블루하우스’는 죄수를 의미하므로 ‘하늘궁’으로 바꿔야 한다..
여성 대통령 및 여성 문제: 박근혜 대통령 탄핵 사태에 대해 여성의 잘못은 남성의 잘못보다 관대하게 봐야 한다..
박근혜 대통령은 헌법을 어긴 적이 없으며, 측근의 기만으로 발생한 문제라고 옹호.
세월호 사건의 박지영 승무원과 최혜정 교사를 언급하며, 이들을 영웅으로 추대하고 기념해야 한다..
언론 문제: 한국 언론은 최순실 사태와 같은 미시적인 문제에만 집중하고, 국제적인 안목(글로벌 마인드)이 부족하다고 비판.
오바마 대통령이 한국 기자들에게 질문을 요청했으나 아무도 나서지 않은 사례를 언급.
미국산 소고기 광우병 논란 등 언론의 과장 보도로 인한 사회적 혼란을 지적.
경제 문제: 전직 대통령들이 만든 1,500조 원의 가계 부채와 국가 부채 40% 이상으로 인해 경제가 어렵다고 진단.
금리 인상 및 대출 규제로 국민들이 이자 부담에 시달리고 있다고 언급.
재벌들이 해외로 공장을 이전하여 국내 재투자가 없는 상황에서 문화융성 사업을 시작한 박근혜 대통령의 입장을 이해한다고 언급.
정치권 비판: 기존 정치권은 희망이 없으며, 국가를 구하겠다는 각오가 부족하다고 비판.
율곡 비리 등 방위산업체 비리를 정리하지 못하는 것은 정권을 잡아도 총 맞아 죽을 수 있기 때문이라고 언급.
이재명 성남시장이 그를 존경한다고 언급한 것을 인용.
민병두 의원이 허경영처럼 과감한 공약을 내세운 사람이 나와야 한다고 진단한 것을 인용.

4. 능력 시연

에너지 치유: 이름을 부르거나 사진을 보면 병이 좋아지고, 직접 보면 고쳐진다..
강연 중 한 남성에게 시연하여 기관지, 갑상선, 뇌졸중 등을 고쳤다..
나이를 거꾸로 가게 하여 수명을 길게 한다..
종교 초월: 자신은 종교를 싫어하며, 어떤 종교를 믿든 이름을 부르면 된다..

영성: 일반적인 예언이나 점쟁이의 예언과 다른, 우주의 모든 학문을 아는 경지에서 미래를 보는 능력.
천지비괘: 주역에서 나라가 망하는 괘를 의미하며, 남자가 위에 있고 여자가 밑에 있는 형국.
지천태괘: 주역에서 태평성대가 오는 괘를 의미하며, 여자가 위에 있고 남자가 밑에 있는 형국.
무극: 일본 국기처럼 아무것도 없는 동그라미 형태로, 우주 전체를 의미하며 가장 강력한 힘을 가진 깃발.
반포지효: 까마귀가 늙은 어미에게 먹이를 물어다 주는 효도를 의미하며, 물질적 효도, 마음의 효도, 대효(입신출세하여 가문의 명예를 높이는 것) 세 가지로 구성.
관포지교: 관중과 포숙아의 우정을 의미하며, 서로의 단점을 이해하고 나라를 위해 인재를 추천하는 관계.